I am listening to NPR's All Things Considered, Ashnikko, a musician I don't know is being interviewed and I hear something about shocking blue hair and I start laughing because it reminded me of one of the times I was arrested (for non-violent civil disobedience) at a anti World Bank protest in D.C. I was being processed through the system at the same time a guy with long, shaggy electric blue hair was, the cops asking us the basics, name, age, height, weight, eye color, hair color. The guy said blue, the cop looks up and the guy just points at his head. The cop is not amused and they the guy says 'Oh you didn't mean here (still pointing at his head) you meant here and he points at his crotch', I just burst out laughing and the guy was laughing too, the cops were not amused.....FYI he said his hair was brown...... I can still picture this whole scene in my head, it was so funny!!!!!
NORTON META TAG
Showing posts with label world bank. Show all posts
Showing posts with label world bank. Show all posts
02 September 2023
03 April 2018
The Country With The World's Worst Inequality Is ...2APR18

26 years after freeing itself from apartheid South Africa still struggles with income and economic inequality. South Africans may be equal politically but economically a very small group controls the economy and most of the wealth in the nation. Still, this World Bank report shows they are taking the necessary steps to address this problem, considering the hundreds of years the country was exploited as a colony and then a brutal plutocracy / oligarchy it is going to take more than 25 years to overcome the damage done. The United States ranking in this report is something to be ashamed of but also proves the voluntary political ignorance of the American people allowing them to be deceived and manipulated by politicians controlled by greedy corporate America, the 1%, is moving America closer and closer to being a Third World nation. From NPR
The Country With The World's Worst Inequality Is ...
More than two decades after South Africa ousted a racist apartheid system that trapped the vast majority of South Africans in poverty, more than half the country still lives below the national poverty line and most of the nation's wealth remains in the hands of a small elite.
"The country was very unequal in 1994 [at the end of apartheid] and now 25 years later South Africa is the most unequal country in the world," says Victor Sulla, a senior economist for the World Bank in charge of southern Africa. "There is no country that we have data about where the inequality is higher than South Africa."
Sulla is the lead author of a new report on poverty and inequality in South Africa.
There are various ways to look at economic inequality and South Africa scores terribly on all of them. Income inequality looks at the gap between what the lowest paid workers earn each day versus the salaries of top employees.
"The people at the bottom in South Africa, they get wages comparable to the people who live in Bangladesh. It's very, very poor. Wages of less than $50 a month," Sulla says. "If you take the top ten percent, they live like in Austria. So it's very high level even by European standards or even by U.S. standards. And we are talking just about employees, people who are getting paid." And not the super-rich who are earning income from factories or property or other investments.
In addition to a huge problem with income inequality, South Africa also has a significant problem with wealth inequality. Wealth inequality looks at the range of a person's assets. So a businessman in Johanesburg might own real estate, factories or other investments while a farmer in KwaZulu Natal might not even own the land she's tilling.
This new report from the World Bank finds that the top 1 percent of South Africans own 70.9 percent of the nation's wealth. The bottom 60 percent of South Africans collectively control only 7 percent of the country's assets.
"How is that possible? Someone must explain this to me!" exclaims 30-year-old Phiwe Budaza, reached on her cellphone in Cape Town. "How is that even possible?"
Budaza, who grew up in the township of Khayelitsha, says inequality is part of life in South Africa.
"There's always been a difference between the white and the black but I think it's getting worse now," she says. Before her cellphone battery dies Budaza says she doesn't have a permanent job. She freelances as a photographer and in her words "hustles" to cover her bills.
"I work as a bartender and I work for a rental company that rents cameras and film equipment," she says.
"It's hard for someone like me who doesn't have a full-time job to survive in Cape Town. The rent for an apartment [in the city] is like three times what I earn in a month." She says she ends up living outside the city, which makes it harder to get to some jobs.
Budaza is not alone in struggling to make ends meet every month in South Africa. The nation's official unemployment rate is currently at 27 percent compared to roughly 4 percent in the United States.
"South Africa is really facing the triple challenge of poverty, unemployment and inequality," says the former head of the African Union, Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma, about the report. Dlamini-Zuma is a long-time anti-apartheid activist who now heads up a national planning commission in President Cyril Ramaphosa's cabinet.
"We are a relatively rich country but with a lot of poor people," she says.
If things don't change dramatically in South Africa, Dlamini-Zuma adds, the country will fail to reach its goal of eliminating extreme poverty (people earning less than $1.90 a day) by the year 2030.
South Africa has been focused on trying to bring down poverty and reduce inequality. And it's had some success. Post-apartheid, the government launched a significant Black Economic Empowerment program to promote the transfer of white-owned businesses to black investors. South Africa has invested heavily in social programs including free primary education, a plan for universal health care, infrastructure projects to expand access to clean water and minimum income grants to parents.
Sulla at the World Bank says South Africa under the post-apartheid ANC government has been a leader on social programs.
"Their social protection programs in terms of different grants and support for the poor are working very well," he says. "This country is one of the best in the world in terms of the efficiency of its social protection system."
Yet despite these efforts the number of South Africans living below the national poverty has actually been increasing since 2011. In 2015, 55.5 percent of South Africans or more than 30 million people were surviving on less than $5 a day.
Sulla says the lack of progress against poverty is partly due to what he calls "opportunity inequality." Some people have more access to opportunity than others. And the people who've traditionally had wealth and economic opportunities continue to enjoy those benefits.
Dlamini-Zuma says the legacy of the apartheid regime still casts a long shadow over the opportunities available for millions of South Africans.
"We should not shy away from acknowledging that apartheid was a system that systematically excluded black people from the economy, from skills, from everything. So overcoming that has to be a big part of what we do."
She says South Africa's progress will be measured on the progress it makes against the "dehumanizing scourge" of poverty.
"Poverty stops us from reaching our full potential individually and collectively," she says. "It's not good to be the country with the highest inequality in the world. We need to get ourselves out of that space. But it's not going to be easy."
24 January 2012
Weekly Wrap: Greece and American banks 20JAN12 & IMF sees rising recession risk from euro credit crisis 24JAN12
HERE is a frightening warning about what may be on the way for the American and world economies. Listen to the story (click the link below the picture) from Marketplace from APR / NPR about the very possible Greek default / bankruptcy and then read the story about the world economy slowing down from the Washington Post......


In a sobering trio of reports on growth, public debt and financial stability, the agency described global trade and investment as waning and depicted the world as perhaps one shock away from a serious downturn. The epicenter of the economic turmoil remains the euro zone, where political leaders have not committed the money needed to prop up weakened governments and banks, thereby threatening to create a cycle of “self-perpetuating pessimism” that could undermine the recovery, the IMF said.
Whether the trigger is a government default in Greece, a bank failure or some other traumatic event, “the world could be plunged into another recession,” said Olivier Blanchard, the IMF’s economic counselor. “The world recovery, which was weak in the first place, is in danger of stalling.”
The agency’s latest forecasts suggest the process may be underway. Projected worldwide economic growth for 2012 was trimmed to 3.25 percent from the 4 percent rate forecast in September. China and India, which have become major engines of global growth, are forecast to cool to around 8.2 percent and 7 percent respectively. The IMF projects that the euro zone will fall into recession and contract by about 0.5 percent this year.
The U.S. economy’s projected growth rate has been holding steady at 1.8 percent since September, the IMF said.
The new reports suggest that the world economy is being undermined by some of the policies the IMF has recommended in recent months to address government debt and strengthen Europe’s banking system. Along with other recent reports issued by the World Bank and private organizations, the IMF studies underscore the major quandry facing policymakers in the United States, Europe and elsewhere as they confront high unemployment rates, slow growth and in some cases the threat of public unrest.
Growth is now so precarious, the agency said, that deficit reduction in the United States and stronger European nations such as Germany should take a back seat.
The IMF said the “accident prone” U.S. political system is at risk of pushing too hard on the brakes. If Congress does not renew payroll tax cuts and extend unemployment benefits that are set to expire in February, government spending this year would drop by more than 2 percent of the country’s annual output, “with negative repercussions for the still unsettled economic outlook,” the agency said.
The Obama administration and Republicans in Congress have been battling over whether and how to extend the payroll tax cuts and jobless benefits. IMF officials say they worry that these political fights are distracting the U.S. government from developing a plan to address chronic problems of long-term spending on health care and retirement.
The IMF has begun pushing countries in Europe and beyond to gird for the worst. The agency wants euro zone nations to commit hundreds of billions of dollars to potential bailouts of Italy and Spain. Those countries are forecast to contract sharply next year, with a downturn of more than 2 percent in Italy making it that much harder for its government to meet its spending targets and retain the faith of investors on world bond markets. The IMF also wants to boost its own war chest and is pressing world economic powers to make an additional $500 billion available should it be needed.
The IMF is one of several organizations offering downbeat assessments. The World Bank last week projected even slower worldwide growth, of just 2.5 percent, and also forecast a euro zone recession.
In a separate study released Tuesday, the Institute of International Finance said that the flow of capital into developing nations dropped by nearly 20 percent last year — a worrisome decline that also occurred during the 2008 financial crisis.
The IIF attributed much of that drop to European banks pulling out of investments and lending in Eastern Europe and Asia. This is one of the most direct ways in which Europe’s troubles are affecting the rest of the world. The decline poses particular problems for Eastern European nations such as Hungary and Ukraine which, unlike some countries in Asia, do not have access to local sources of money when French, Italian or German investors disappear.
The downturn in investment is partly the consequence of policies enacted in Europe to try to cope with its crisis. In this instance, European banks are retreating from other parts of the world to comply with stiffer regulations the European Union imposed last year — partly at the urging of the IMF — that require the firms to maintain larger capital buffers against possible losses.
The requirements are combining with government austerity measures to crimp growth.
The speed with which Europe demanded its banks meet the new requirements “is having a drastic negative impact,” said IIF chief economist Philip Suttle. The IIF, which represents the world’s major financial institutions, has been fighting to soften the impact of financial industry regulations crafted after the 2008 crisis.
In its new reports, the IMF shared the concern that Europe’s move to recapitalize its banking system could be damaging.
To limit the fallout, the agency said the euro zone should use taxpayer money from around the region to bolster banks that need help as well — just as euro zone countries are pooling resources to back troubled governments.
Weekly Wrap: Greece and American banks
STAN HONDA/AFP/Getty Images
Reviewing the week's headlines on Wall Street.
<iframe src="http://www.marketplace.org/node/50228/player/popout" width="600" height="300" ></iframe>
<iframe src="http://www.marketplace.org/node/50228/player/popout" width="600" height="300" ></iframe>
Interview by
John Carney from CNBC and Felix Salmon from Reuters discuss this week's news on Wall Street and beyond.
If Greece doesn't get a deal:
If Greece doesn't get a deal:
John Carney: So Greece has, on March 20th, a tremendous amount of debt that's coming due. They do not have the money to pay it off. This will be a gigantic default that would put several European banks in trouble, and we would have an enormous international financial calamity.For more analysis, listen to the full audio above.
Felix Salmon: I don't think it would be that bad, to be honest. Well, it is a default, there's no two ways about it. If you don't pay back $14 billion when it's due, that's a default. The only question is: Will you replace that amount that you owed with something else and keep on paying that, or will you just owe that $14 billion and have that paper be in default?
About the author
Kai Ryssdal is the host and senior editor of Marketplace, public radio’s program on business and the economy. Follow Kai on Twitter @kairyssdalIMF sees rising recession risk from euro credit crisis
By Howard Schneider
The global economy is slowing sharply and is at far greater risk of recession than was thought just months ago with Europe’s debt crisis creating “fertile ground” for a rapid collapse, the International Monetary Fund warned on Tuesday.In a sobering trio of reports on growth, public debt and financial stability, the agency described global trade and investment as waning and depicted the world as perhaps one shock away from a serious downturn. The epicenter of the economic turmoil remains the euro zone, where political leaders have not committed the money needed to prop up weakened governments and banks, thereby threatening to create a cycle of “self-perpetuating pessimism” that could undermine the recovery, the IMF said.
Whether the trigger is a government default in Greece, a bank failure or some other traumatic event, “the world could be plunged into another recession,” said Olivier Blanchard, the IMF’s economic counselor. “The world recovery, which was weak in the first place, is in danger of stalling.”
The agency’s latest forecasts suggest the process may be underway. Projected worldwide economic growth for 2012 was trimmed to 3.25 percent from the 4 percent rate forecast in September. China and India, which have become major engines of global growth, are forecast to cool to around 8.2 percent and 7 percent respectively. The IMF projects that the euro zone will fall into recession and contract by about 0.5 percent this year.
The U.S. economy’s projected growth rate has been holding steady at 1.8 percent since September, the IMF said.
The new reports suggest that the world economy is being undermined by some of the policies the IMF has recommended in recent months to address government debt and strengthen Europe’s banking system. Along with other recent reports issued by the World Bank and private organizations, the IMF studies underscore the major quandry facing policymakers in the United States, Europe and elsewhere as they confront high unemployment rates, slow growth and in some cases the threat of public unrest.
Growth is now so precarious, the agency said, that deficit reduction in the United States and stronger European nations such as Germany should take a back seat.
The IMF said the “accident prone” U.S. political system is at risk of pushing too hard on the brakes. If Congress does not renew payroll tax cuts and extend unemployment benefits that are set to expire in February, government spending this year would drop by more than 2 percent of the country’s annual output, “with negative repercussions for the still unsettled economic outlook,” the agency said.
The Obama administration and Republicans in Congress have been battling over whether and how to extend the payroll tax cuts and jobless benefits. IMF officials say they worry that these political fights are distracting the U.S. government from developing a plan to address chronic problems of long-term spending on health care and retirement.
The IMF has begun pushing countries in Europe and beyond to gird for the worst. The agency wants euro zone nations to commit hundreds of billions of dollars to potential bailouts of Italy and Spain. Those countries are forecast to contract sharply next year, with a downturn of more than 2 percent in Italy making it that much harder for its government to meet its spending targets and retain the faith of investors on world bond markets. The IMF also wants to boost its own war chest and is pressing world economic powers to make an additional $500 billion available should it be needed.
The IMF is one of several organizations offering downbeat assessments. The World Bank last week projected even slower worldwide growth, of just 2.5 percent, and also forecast a euro zone recession.
In a separate study released Tuesday, the Institute of International Finance said that the flow of capital into developing nations dropped by nearly 20 percent last year — a worrisome decline that also occurred during the 2008 financial crisis.
The IIF attributed much of that drop to European banks pulling out of investments and lending in Eastern Europe and Asia. This is one of the most direct ways in which Europe’s troubles are affecting the rest of the world. The decline poses particular problems for Eastern European nations such as Hungary and Ukraine which, unlike some countries in Asia, do not have access to local sources of money when French, Italian or German investors disappear.
The downturn in investment is partly the consequence of policies enacted in Europe to try to cope with its crisis. In this instance, European banks are retreating from other parts of the world to comply with stiffer regulations the European Union imposed last year — partly at the urging of the IMF — that require the firms to maintain larger capital buffers against possible losses.
The requirements are combining with government austerity measures to crimp growth.
The speed with which Europe demanded its banks meet the new requirements “is having a drastic negative impact,” said IIF chief economist Philip Suttle. The IIF, which represents the world’s major financial institutions, has been fighting to soften the impact of financial industry regulations crafted after the 2008 crisis.
In its new reports, the IMF shared the concern that Europe’s move to recapitalize its banking system could be damaging.
To limit the fallout, the agency said the euro zone should use taxpayer money from around the region to bolster banks that need help as well — just as euro zone countries are pooling resources to back troubled governments.
Labels:
20MAR12,
bailout,
banks,
deficit,
euro zone,
Felix Salmon,
Greece,
imf,
John Carney,
recession,
stimulus,
world bank
11 February 2011
Time for the World Bank Group to take human rights seriously 28FEB11
TOO often the World Bank funds projects proposed by huge multi-national corporations (who are wealthy enough to invest their own funds but are too greedy to do that) in Third World countries with no regard for the human rights of the local population and no concern about possible environmental damage. These projects are rape and pillage operations that leave communities and countries reeling from economic, social and environmental damage while these corporations grow richer. Please join Amnesty International in calling on the World Bank to adopt strict regulations on human rights and environmental controls when providing funding, click the header or link or go to their website.
Date Published: 31 August 2010
The International Finance Corporation (IFC) is part of the World Bank Group. One of its major functions is supporting private sector investment in developing countries. These countries often face significant challenges in ensuring effective protection of human rights. In 2009, IFC launched a review of its sustainability framework, a set of policies that lays out IFC's own responsibilities and the expected behaviour of its clients. This report provides a human rights analysis of the draft revised Sustainability Framework and also assesses IFC's own human rights analysis, which it carried out as part of the review process.
This document is also available in:
Spanish:
Time for the World Bank Group to take human rights seriously
Corporations can have an enormous negative impact on the rights of individuals and communities. Through its research, Amnesty International has exposed how these impacts can range from community livelihoods being threatened or destroyed to forced evictions carried out to make way for extractive operations.
The World Bank Group, among other functions, finances the activities of corporations in developing countries. This is done through an agency called the International Finance Corporation (IFC). The IFC frequently supports industries of a particularly invasive nature, such as oil, gas and mining projects. These industries are often associated with environmental damage and human rights harm.
The IFC must make sure it has strong safeguards to prevent human rights abuses as a result of its operations.
Unfortunately the World Bank Group is refusing to take human rights seriously. In May 2011 the IFC will adopt new policies to manage social and environmental risks associated with the activities it supports. Not only is the IFC proposing to adopt safeguards that are inadequate to prevent negative human rights impacts, but it is REFUSING to even make a commitment to respect human rights.
As an institution that claims to be committed to fighting poverty and improving people’s lives, and which is governed by member states that have international human rights obligations, this is entirely unacceptable.
You can find Amnesty International’s full analysis of the IFC policies here.
Corporate actors cannot be let off the hook for their negative impact on human rights. Take action and tell the head of IFC it is time to take human rights seriously now!
- Take Action
- › Home
- › Time to invest in human rights: A human rights due diligence framework for the International Finance Corporation
Time to invest in human rights: A human rights due diligence framework for the International Finance Corporation
Time to invest in human rights: A human rights due diligence framework for the International Finance Corporation
Download:
Index Number: IOR 80/004/2010Date Published: 31 August 2010
The International Finance Corporation (IFC) is part of the World Bank Group. One of its major functions is supporting private sector investment in developing countries. These countries often face significant challenges in ensuring effective protection of human rights. In 2009, IFC launched a review of its sustainability framework, a set of policies that lays out IFC's own responsibilities and the expected behaviour of its clients. This report provides a human rights analysis of the draft revised Sustainability Framework and also assesses IFC's own human rights analysis, which it carried out as part of the review process.
This document is also available in:
Spanish:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


