NORTON META TAG

17 March 2026

New U.S. Diplomat Was Not So Diplomatic. South Africa Pushed Back. 15MAR26



 I love that the world is starting to push back against the neo-nazi fascist imperialism of the drumpf / trump-vance administration and the ass licking gop / greed over people-republican party. It is disgusting, shameful and embarrassing the drumpf / trump-vance administration sent fascist fotze trunt leo brent bozell iii as our ambassador to South Africa knowing his rascist attitude towards the ANC and South Africa ( In 1987, Bozell and the NCPAC ( national conservative political action committee ) joined a coalition of groups opposed to the Reagan administration meeting with the president of the African National Congress, the leading anti-apartheid group in South Africa. Bozell wrote that he was "proud to become a member of the Coalition Against ANC Terrorism." In 2013 Bozell complained on Twitter that the mainstream media "mythologizes" the late anti-apartheid leader and first president of a post-apartheid South Africa, Nelson Mandela ) The world is showing America they do not have to tolerate NOT MY pres drumpf's / trump's ignorance, rudeness, vile hate, bigotry and racism, his narcissism, greed, sociopathic and psychotic behaviour, that they do not have to kow-tow to him. Now if only the American electorate sends this same message to him with the results of the 2026 Midterms!!! From the New York Times.....

Jeanna Smialek

Brussels bureau chief

“This is not Europe’s war, but Europe’s interests are directly at stake,” Kaja Kallas, the European Union’s top diplomat, said after meeting with foreign ministers from across the 27-nation bloc in Brussels on Monday. For now, she said, the European Union would not expand a maritime operation in the Middle East to help protect commercial traffic in the Strait of Hormuz.

New U.S. Diplomat Was Not So Diplomatic. South Africa Pushed Back.


The latest clash between the two countries illustrates the depths to which relations have sunk and the struggle to forge a new path forward.


Less than a month into his job, the new United States ambassador to South Africa delivered some harsh words against the government.

He claimed that South Africa had more than 150 laws “aimed against whites,” and that the Trump administration was “running out of patience” with the South African government.

He made veiled comments about South Africa’s president, Cyril Ramaphosa, subtly accusing him of “insulting our president,” an apparent reference to Mr. Ramaphosa’s criticisms of President Trump in a recent interview with The New York Times. And he rejected a South African court’s ruling that an anti-apartheid song was not hate speech. “I don’t care what your courts say,” said the ambassador, L. Brent Bozell III, speaking at a business forum in the Western Cape Province.

After making those statements, Mr. Bozell was summoned by the foreign minister on Wednesday to explain his “undiplomatic remarks.”

This latest clash between the United States and South Africa illustrates how deeply relations between the two governments have fallen. Early last year, South African officials worked hard to explain their policies to the Trump administration, eager to find common ground with their nation’s second-largest trading partner. They sent envoys and requested meetings.

Now, South Africa appears to have given up trying to reason with Trump officials on subjects like the killing of white farmers, government land seizures and laws meant to redress the legacy of apartheid. “We will not be bullied,” Mr. Ramaphosa said in his state of the nation addresses last month and last year.

South African officials have realized that “trying to explain or clarify or debunk those negative narratives is a largely futile exercise,” said Ziyanda Stuurman, a Cape Town-based adviser at Africa Practice, a strategic advisory firm. “Ultimately, right now, I think that the relationship is in a state of managed decline where neither side will climb down from their view of the other.”

This icy posture with the United States carries great risk for South Africa, a much smaller country. But South Africa also has a history of diversifying its alliances with the hope of making itself less reliant on global superpowers. That strategy of seeking out like-minded middle powers has become more pronounced amid global disruptions caused by Mr. Trump, analysts say.

On the same day that Mr. Bozell made his remarks, Mr. Ramaphosa was on a state visit to Brazil, where its president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, suggested that their nations deepen defense cooperation. “I don’t know if Comrade Ramaphosa realizes that if we don’t prepare in terms of defense, one day someone might invade us,” he said during a joint news conference.

“We have a lot to learn from each other,” Mr. Ramaphosa replied.

As the leader of Africa’s largest economy, Mr. Ramaphosa has long trumpeted the role of middle powers on the global stage. In his interview last month with The Times, he criticized what he described as attempts by some countries to dominate others using economic pressure and other levers.

“We’ve now arrived, and it is wrong for us to keep on being locked out of the door,” he said. “Much as we are small or middle power countries, respect us as well and deal with us on the basis of respecting our sovereignty and seeking to advance the interests of all.”

But Mr. Ramaphosa and his government have been accused, even by allies, of not always practicing what they preach. After Russia invaded Ukraine four years ago, South Africa walked back its initial statement that Russian troops should withdraw, a move that angered its European partners.

Mr. Ramaphosa also drew condemnation this month for sending a condolence letter to the Iranian Embassy after the country’s supreme leader was killed by U.S.-Israeli bombings.

South Africa’s critics have argued that its claims of nonalignment have been used as a tactic by the governing party, the African National Congress, to maintain alliances with apartheid-era allies that the West now views as enemies, like Cuba and Russia.

“Nonalignment is used to pretend neutrality as cover for aligning with anti-Western interests,” Joshua Meservey, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, a conservative think tank, wrote in a thread on X. “SA has openly aligned against the US on key issues for decades, something the US ignored until recently.”

At the business conference, Mr. Bozell said he was also concerned about “South Africa’s growing engagement with some of America’s greatest adversaries,” an apparent reference to Tehran.

After his meeting with South African officials, Mr. Bozell clarified his remarks on social media on Wednesday, in an effort to bring down the temperature. But the substance of his comments has not changed.

“If the U.S. ambassador sticks to his guns on these issues,” said Priyal Singh, a senior researcher at the Institute for Security Studies, a South African think tank, “it’s definitely going to be a tough couple of years for South Africa and the U.S.”


John Eligon is the Johannesburg bureau chief for The Times, covering a wide range of events and trends that influence and shape the lives of ordinary people across southern Africa.


The Latest on the Trump Administration



15 March 2026

How the Trump Administration Is Giving Even More Tax Breaks to the Wealthy 8NOV25


Congressional Republicans celebrated the signing of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in July. The legislation provided roughly $4 trillion in tax cuts.Credit...THESE ARE JUST SOME OF THE MEMBERS OF THE TRUMP ARSCHLECKEN CLUB 

 THE drumpf / trump-vance administration with the gop / greed over people-republican party wants $50 BILLION more for their illegal and immoral war in Iran after giving the wealthy more tax breaks knowing many of these same people are war profiteers and will benefit from all the wars he starts. Posting this from the New York Times though it was first published on 8 NOV 25 just to remind America who these neo-nazi fascist war pigs actually care about.....

How the Trump Administration Is Giving Even More Tax Breaks to the Wealthy


The Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service are issuing rules that provide hundreds of billions of dollars in tax relief to big companies and the ultrarich.


With little public scrutiny, the Trump administration is handing out hundreds of billions of dollars in tax cuts to some of the country’s most profitable companies and wealthiest investors.

The Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service, through a series of new notices and proposed regulations, are giving breaks to giant private equity firms, crypto companies, foreign real estate investors, insurance providers and a variety of multinational corporations.

The primary target: The administration is rapidly gutting a 2022 law intended to ensure that a sliver of the country’s most profitable corporations pay at least some federal income tax. The provision, the corporate alternative minimum tax, was passed by Democrats and signed into law by President Joseph R. Biden Jr. It sought to stop corporations like Microsoft, Amazon and Johnson & Johnson from being able to report big profits to shareholders yet low tax liabilities to the federal government. It was projected to raise $222 billion over a decade.

But the succession of notices the Treasury and I.R.S. have issued beginning this summer means the tax could bring in a fraction of that.


These breaks come in addition to the roughly $4 trillion package of tax cuts that President Trump signed into law in July. The legislation, passed entirely by Republicans, heavily benefits businesses and the ultrawealthy. It is projected to add trillions of dollars to the federal deficit and came with steep cuts to health care for the elderly and food stamps for the poorest Americans.

With its various tax relief provisions, the administration is now effectively adding hundreds of billions of dollars in new breaks for big businesses and investors. The Treasury is empowered to write rules to help the I.R.S. carry out tax laws passed by Congress. But the aggressive actions of the Trump administration raise questions about whether it is exceeding its legal authority.

Mr. Trump and congressional Republicans have attacked federal workers as instruments of the “deep state,” exercising power beyond anything authorized by the law. Now the administration is doing the same thing, several tax experts said, undermining laws that hit the ultrawealthy and big companies.

“Treasury has clearly been enacting unlegislated tax cuts,” said Kyle Pomerleau, a tax economist at the American Enterprise Institute, a right-leaning think tank. “Congress determines tax law. Treasury undermines this constitutional principle when it asserts more authority over the structure of the tax code than Congress provides it.”

The alternative minimum tax isn’t the administration’s only effort to roll back taxes on large businesses and wealthy individuals. Last month, the Treasury and I.R.S. granted new tax relief to foreign investors in U.S. real estate. In August, they withdrew regulations to prevent multinationals from avoiding taxes by claiming duplicate losses in multiple countries at once. And, as The New York Times previously reported, the Treasury and I.R.S. have rolled back a crackdown on an aggressive tax shelter used by big companies, including Occidental Petroleum and AT&T. That amounts to another $100 billion in cuts — and likely far more, according to tax advisers.

Changes like these are not widely publicized by the Treasury, but are closely followed by tax planners for the country’s biggest corporations — who are applauding the new guidelines. In notes to clients, advisers at KPMG celebrated the new “array of choices” available for investors seeking to avoid the corporate alternative minimum tax. They noted that the Treasury’s moves provided “significant flexibility” for clients to trim their bills, allowing them to “cherry-pick” the rules that best suit their needs.

A Treasury spokesman said the new moves were “a practical approach that supports American investment and competitiveness” and were meant to replace the Biden administration’s “compliance maze that would have buried taxpayers in red tape.” The spokesman did not address the issue of whether the Treasury was exceeding its legal authority.

Mr. Trump and congressional Republicans have attacked federal workers as instruments of the “deep state,” exercising power beyond anything authorized by the law. Now the administration is doing the same thing, several tax experts said, undermining laws that hit the ultrawealthy and big companies.

“Treasury has clearly been enacting unlegislated tax cuts,” said Kyle Pomerleau, a tax economist at the American Enterprise Institute, a right-leaning think tank. “Congress determines tax law. Treasury undermines this constitutional principle when it asserts more authority over the structure of the tax code than Congress provides it.”

The alternative minimum tax isn’t the administration’s only effort to roll back taxes on large businesses and wealthy individuals. Last month, the Treasury and I.R.S. granted new tax relief to foreign investors in U.S. real estate. In August, they withdrew regulations to prevent multinationals from avoiding taxes by claiming duplicate losses in multiple countries at once. And, as The New York Times previously reported, the Treasury and I.R.S. have rolled back a crackdown on an aggressive tax shelter used by big companies, including Occidental Petroleum and AT&T. That amounts to another $100 billion in cuts — and likely far more, according to tax advisers.

Changes like these are not widely publicized by the Treasury, but are closely followed by tax planners for the country’s biggest corporations — who are applauding the new guidelines. In notes to clients, advisers at KPMG celebrated the new “array of choices” available for investors seeking to avoid the corporate alternative minimum tax. They noted that the Treasury’s moves provided “significant flexibility” for clients to trim their bills, allowing them to “cherry-pick” the rules that best suit their needs.

A Treasury spokesman said the new moves were “a practical approach that supports American investment and competitiveness” and were meant to replace the Biden administration’s “compliance maze that would have buried taxpayers in red tape.” The spokesman did not address the issue of whether the Treasury was exceeding its legal authority.


The Treasury’s actions are probably contributing hundreds of billions of dollars to the federal deficit, tax experts said. That is on top of the trillions that the legislation signed by Mr. Trump in July is already adding to the deficit. Yet unlike laws passed by Congress, Treasury is under no obligation to publicly account for revenue lost by its actions — such as cutting spending to offset the money no longer being collected.

Doing it through the Treasury means “you can just give away the goodies to one group, without having to take back anything from another,” said Daniel Hemel, a law professor at New York University. This loophole, he said, is one “that previous administrations have exploited and which the Trump administration is exploiting more aggressively.”


The actions by Treasury over the past few months are an accelerated version of what the agency did during the first Trump administration: Regulators killed off efforts to crack down on a lucrative estate tax avoidance strategy, and watered down new taxes on multinational companies in the 2017 Republican tax package.

Big companies effectively keep two sets of books — one for investors and another for the I.R.S. The profits they report to the I.R.S. permit various deductions that can bring a firm’s tax rate far below the 21 percent corporate tax rate.

A holy grail of tax planning is figuring out a deduction that businesses can claim on their tax return — but one that they don’t report to investors, which would dent their profits, potentially hurt their stock price and thus depress compensation paid to executives. In 2021, the Biden administration was unable to get Congress to sign on to an international plan to tax multinational corporations. So the Democratic-led Congress revived an old idea to potentially achieve similar results by imposing a tax on the same profits that corporations report to their investors.

That alternative minimum tax was part of a 2022 domestic policy law called the Inflation Reduction Act. The new tax would apply to big corporations with an effective tax rate below 15 percent.

Not everyone viewed the new tax positively. “But it’s a thing that they were able to do at that moment in time,” said Kimberly Clausing, a top Biden administration Treasury tax official, and now a law professor at the University of California, Los Angeles.


The original proposal was relatively simple. Limited to a tiny group of corporations averaging profits of more than $1 billion a year, it would require I.R.S. auditors to look at the income reported to shareholders. If the companies paid taxes at a rate of less than 15 percent on those earnings, the new tax would kick in. It would hit as few as 80 corporations, according to one study.

Industry lobbyists swung into action, and Democrats in Congress began carving out enormous exceptions, permitting deductions for, say, businesses investing in heavy machinery and wireless spectrum used by the likes of T-Mobile and Verizon.

As a result of changes like these, the new tax’s projected revenue dropped to $222 billion from $319 billion, according to congressional estimates.

The amount of revenue is expected to shrink even more, in part because of the Treasury’s actions.

The “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” that Mr. Trump signed into law in July provided well over $1 trillion in relief for big companies when they calculate their income tax bills. But those breaks didn’t extend to the separate calculation that corporations must make for their alternative minimum tax bill. As a result, the regular tax bills of many businesses promise to drop so sharply — below 15 percent — that they could be newly subject to the alternative minimum tax.

The new law could have swept in two of the biggest crypto firms, Coinbase and Strategy. In response, they sought rule changes for calculating the minimum tax. Three high-powered legal advisers — Michael Desmond, who served as the I.R.S. chief counsel in the first Trump administration; Andrew Strelka, formerly senior tax counsel in the Biden administration; and Eugene Scalia, the labor secretary in the first Trump administration — pushed to exempt “mark to market” gains reported to investors. Those gains reflect the increase in value of the investments held by companies that haven’t been sold yet.


On Sept. 30, the I.R.S. granted their request, explicitly citing “digital assets.” Big crypto companies “have been granted a reprieve,” lawyers at Vedder Price wrote.

Strategy declared within hours that it “no longer expects to become subject to” the minimum tax, after previously disclosing a potential multibillion-dollar bill under the new tax.

Coinbase said in a statement that it supported the Trump administration’s approach to the regulations for administering the minimum tax. Strategy did not respond to a request for comment.

The crypto companies “owe tax and they’re not happy about it, so they’re going to the Trump administration for a special carve-out,” complained Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon, the ranking Democrat on the tax-writing Senate Finance Committee.

Some energy firms are already benefiting, too. Cheniere Energy, the giant natural gas exporter, disclosed in a securities filing last month that, thanks to the most recent Treasury notice, it was entitled to a refund of $380 million of previously paid alternative minimum tax.

Private equity firms are yet another beneficiary. Beginning in early 2023, the industry giant Blackstone pressed for a number of provisions to be included in the regulations to administer the minimum tax.

This summer, Blackstone succeeded. Much of the recent guidance grants Blackstone’s requests, giving private equity firms enormous flexibility to calculate their bills.

A Blackstone spokeswoman declined to comment.

The regulations also provide new flexibility for insurance companies in using so-called tax losses. For one, the new rules permit some insurers to use those losses to reduce their bills under the minimum tax — even for prior years.

“They’re effectively repealing the statute,” said Monte Jackel, a tax lawyer and former I.R.S. official, referring to the minimum tax law.

Kitty Bennett contributed research.

Jesse Drucker is an investigative reporter for the Business section and has written extensively on the world of high end tax avoidance.

A version of this article appears in print on Nov. 10, 2025, Section A, Page 1 of the New York edition with the headline: More Tax Breaks For the Wealthy

The Latest on the Trump Administration


  • Oil Drilling Project: The $5 billion project in the Gulf of Mexico, approved by the Trump administration, is expected to produce up to 10 billion barrels of oil by the end of this decade. Critics say it could endanger people and marine life.

  • Housing Executive Orders: President Trump released two executive orders aimed at tackling the nation’s housing crisis. One order aims to increase housing supply, while the other loosens lending rules for community banks, making it easier for home buyers and builders to borrow.

  • Boat Strikes and Seized Oil Tankers: Experts in international and U.S. domestic law told an inter-American human rights organization that the Pentagon’s campaign of blowing up boats it suspected of smuggling drugs in the Pacific Ocean and the Caribbean was illegal. And maintaining the oil tankers the Trump administration has seized has already cost the United States tens of millions of dollars.

  • TikTok Fee: Investors in a deal to create a U.S.-controlled TikTok are set to pay $10 billion to the U.S. Treasury, the latest example of the Trump administration’s inserting the federal government into corporate deal making in unusual ways.

  • Jared Kushner: Trump’s son-in-law, who is one of the U.S. government’s chief negotiators in the Middle East, is trying to raise more money for his private equity firm from governments in the region, according to five people with knowledge of the talks who were not permitted to speak publicly about the discussions.

  • Talks With Cuba: President Miguel Díaz-Canel announced that his government had been holding talks with the Trump administration while managing an increasingly severe lack of fuel. The Cuban government also said that it was planning to release 51 prisoners, a move that appears to be an effort to appease the U.S. government.