Bucknackt's Sordid Tawdry Blog

BUCKNACKT'S SORDID TAWDRY BLOG We should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive & well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, chocolate, bier or wein in hand, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "WHOO-HOO, WHAT A RIDE!!!!!!"

NORTON META TAG

Showing posts with label federal reserve. Show all posts
Showing posts with label federal reserve. Show all posts

13 September 2025

Fed governor Lisa Cook called condo a second home, documents show 12SEP25


 Has anyone totalled the cost to the American taxpayer of all the lawsuits ( like this one ) against the fascist drumpf / trump-vance administration's illegal and immoral actions. No complaints from doge or the federal deficit hawks of the gop / greed over people-republican party?

Fed governor Lisa Cook called condo a second home, documents show


President Donald Trump is pushing to fire Cook over unproven allegations that she committed mortgage fraud by calling more than one of her homes a primary residence.


Updated
September 12, 2025 at 8:11 p.m. EDTyesterday at 8:11 p.m. EDT
Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook described an Atlanta property now under intense scrutiny from the Trump administration as a vacation home or a second home in multiple documents in 2021, records show.
In a loan estimate for Cook’s Atlanta condo prepared by her lender, the home’s “property use” is described as “vacation home,” according to the document dated May 2021 and obtained by The Washington Post. And in a December 2021 form submitted to the Biden administration for her nomination to the central bank, Cook listed the Atlanta property as a second home under a question about vacation homes and other “additional” properties.

President Donald Trump is trying to fire Cook from her seat on the Fed, citing accusations that she committed mortgage fraud by calling more than one of her homes a primary or personal residence, which can sometimes help people secure lower mortgage rates. The president can remove Fed board members “for cause,” and the administration says the fraud accusation is enough to act.

Cook has sued to keep her seat, arguing that the allegations are unproven. The Justice Department has opened an investigation, but no charges have been filed. Earlier this week, a federal judge temporarily halted Cook’s firing, saying Trump’s attempt to fire her was probably illegal. The Justice Department quickly appealed and has asked for a ruling before next week’s Fed board meeting.
The documents, first reported by Reuters on Friday evening, appear to indicate that at least at some point before Cook closed on the loan, her lender understood the condo was not her primary residence.

Bill Pulte, director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, has argued that Cook may have gotten a lower rate because the lender was treating the condo as a primary home. Cook’s financial disclosure forms indicate she has a loan against a property in Atlanta with an interest rate of 3.25 percent, which was slightly higher than prevailing rates for a primary residence at the time she took on the mortgage.

Cook also owns properties in Ann Arbor, Michigan, and Cambridge, Massachusetts, which the documents did not address.

Through all the legal back and forth, Cook has yet to respond substantively to the fraud allegations. She has said she will not be bullied into leaving, and her lawyers have focused their legal arguments on what they call an “unprecedented and illegal” attempt to oust her.

The case is drawing intense attention in Washington, with the Fed’s independence on the line. The dispute could quickly land before the Supreme Court, which has so far shown considerable deference to Trump, though it has also recognized that the Fed is structured differently from other agencies and is meant to operate independently of the White House.

The White House, meanwhile, contends that presidents have long enjoyed broad authority to remove officials for cause and that even if courts were to scrutinize such a decision, any review should avoid interference with the president’s constitutional control over top executive branch officials.

By Rachel Siegel
Rachel Siegel covers the economics of real estate and housing. She previously covered the Federal Reserve. Before joining The Post in June 2017, Rachel contributed to The Marshall Project and The Dallas Morning News

By Andrew Ackerman
Andrew covers the way Washington oversees Wall Street


Posted by Bucknackt at 15:39 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: authoritarian theocratic oligarchy, doge, drumpf / trump-vance administration lawsuits, fascism, fascist heritage foundation project 2025, federal reserve, NOT MY pres drumpf / trump

03 September 2015

The Most Important News from the Progressive Movement brought to you by the Agenda Project Action Fund 3SEP15


The Most Important News from the Progressive Movement brought to you by the Agenda Project Action Fund
WILL CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM GET A PODIUM IN THE DEBATE? - Potential Democratic presidential candidate and Top Wonk Lawrence Lessig has registered at 1% in the most recent PPP poll, if Lessig receives at least 1% in a total of three national polls within 6 weeks of the first Democratic Presidential Primary debate he will meet the minimum threshold needed to participate. He stated that he will formally declare his candidacy if he raises $1 million dollars by Labor Day and that he is already three-quarters of the way towards reaching that goal. You can learn more about Lessig’s campaign HERE.
ADDRESSING INEQUALITY IN FED POLICY - The Roosevelt Institute’s Chief Economist Joseph Stiglitz released an analysis on Federal Reserve policy and how it affects and contributes to inequality of income in the United States. Read the report HERE for Stiglitz’s argument and suggestions.
VIDEO CHALLENGE WINNER - Democracy for All has announced the first winner in their ‘$64K Democracy for All Video Challenge.’ Check out the video that won the first $1,000 prize and click here to learn how to join the contest.
MOVEON ON THE MOVE - MoveOn.Org debuted their latest #NoWarWithIran tactic with the unveiling of the “Schumer Mobile.” The Schumer Mobile is a mobile billboard that calls attention to Senator Schumer’s opposition to the Iran Deal by plastering his picture in a yearbook format alongside a superlative which reads “Most Likely to Start A War.” Check out the mobile tour locations.
KOCH BROTHERS POLLUTING MORE THAN ELECTIONS - This week, The Bridge Project has released a comprehensive look at how the Koch brothers have polluted Ohio with both their business and their politics. The 88 page report exposes the Koch brothers and their toxic effects on Ohio’s environment, workers, healthcare and economy.
APPLAUDING ONLINE VOTER REGISTRATION IN PA - On August 31st, the Advancement Project celebrated the launch of Pennsylvania’s online voter registration system, votespa.com. Check out the new registration platform and find out why it is a victory for all citizens.
CENTER ON BUDGET AND POLICY PRIORITIES REPORT - The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities released a new analysis of the 2015 Social Security Trustee’s report which details what the report says about the current and projected financial status of the program.
ABORTION ACCESS TO LOW INCOME WOMEN PROTECTED - The Center for Reproductive Rights and  Planned Parenthood won a court ruling this week in the Alaska Superior Court, striking down both a Department of Health and Social Services regulation and state law that would have severely limited Medicaid coverage of abortions for low-income women.
LGBTQ VICTORY- The Southern Poverty Law Center succeed in securing the release of transgender inmate Ashley Diamond this week. The SPLC had recently presented a lawsuit to the Georgia Department of Corrections on behalf of Ashley, who had spent three years of being detained in an unsafe environment where she suffering from ongoing sexual assault.
… From the Wonk Wire...
Donald Trump and Campaign Finance Reform - Democracy 21’s President, Fred Wertheimer, writes about Trump’s take on campaign finance reform and how he, an abuser of the system, has taken no stance on changing it.
The Fearmongers Wage War vs $15 – Heather McGhee, President of the pro-democracy think tank Demos, wrote an Op-ed on the fast food industry and their use of propaganda to destroy the fight for $15.
Don’t Mess with Social Security - Dean Baker, the macroeconomist and co-founder of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, was featured in the Arizona Daily Star as a guest opinion on why we need Social Security.
...Visit our website at www.PracticalProgress.org and our Twitter @PractProgress. Like what you see? JOIN the movement by sending tips, news, and reactions to PracticalProgress@agendaproject.org...
Posted by Bucknackt at 20:59 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: 2016 Pres election, anti war, federal reserve, income inequality, Iran nuclear deal, koch brothers, Lawrence Lessig, living wage, Ohio, Social Security, voter registration, votespa.com

13 July 2012

Stop the J.P. Morgan Loophole 13JUL12

THERE are a few in Congress not afraid to challenge the bank-financial cabal, Sen Merkley D OR is one of them. Hope you will add your name to his petition....

Below is an email from U.S. Senator Jeff Merkley, who is leading the charge for a ban on high-risk trading by big Wall Street banks, including J.P. Morgan. Sen. Merkley created a petition on SignOn.org that's spreading like wildfire. Now, he's asking for help from MoveOn members in Virginia and across America.
Please add your name to Senator Merkley's SignOn.org petition urging Ben Bernanke and the Fed to close down the J.P. Morgan loophole.

Bankers on Wall Street wrecked our economy by taking reckless risks in pursuit of massive paydays. And, as J.P. Morgan has made clear, Wall Street learned nothing and is still gambling.
If you agree that big banks should not gamble with the federally insured deposits that families and small businesses depend on, click here to sign my petition:
http://signon.org/sign/tell-wall-street-stop?source=mo&id=46133-17549061-HUQxdgx
I successfully fought for a ban on high-risk trading by big Wall Street banks. This rule, called the Volcker rule firewall, is meant to ensure that when Wall Street's bad bets blow up, you and I don't get burned again. But for the last two years, Wall Street's legion of lobbyists have been trying to blow holes in that firewall.
Wall Street lobbyists want the Fed to write the J.P. Morgan loophole into law. We can't let that happen. And with your help, we won't. Pleaseadd your name to my SignOn.org petition urging Ben Bernanke and the Fed to close down the J.P. Morgan loophole.
Thanks!
–U.S. Senator Jeff Merkley
This petition was created on SignOn.org, the progressive, nonprofit petition site that will never sell your email address and will never promote a petition because someone paid us to. SignOn.org is sponsored by MoveOn Civic Action, which is not responsible for the contents of this or other petitions posted on the site.
 
Posted by Bucknackt at 20:45 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: bank-financial cabal, ben bernanke, federal reserve, jp morgan, jp morgan loophole, Sen Jeff Merkley D OR, Volker firewall, wall street

14 May 2012

Jamie Dimon's JPMorgan Chase: Why It's the Scandal of Our Time 14MAI12

IT isn't amazing jamie dimon of jp morgan chase hasn't been charged with financial crimes, nobody else from wall street since the great recession began has either. These people and the banks and financial companies they run are untouchable and they know it. They control the congress as well as the federal agencies who are supposed to be regulating them. I believe the jamie dimons of the bank-financial cabal of wall street are as evil as al qaeda. Both struck near fatal blows to the financial heart and the economy of the nation. Both are responsible for the deaths of Americans because of their actions (I believe thousands of Americans have died because of the recession. Many have committed suicide, many more have died of stress related illness and disease aggravated by and caused by the severity of the recession, families have been damaged and destroyed). Both have used, and continue to threaten terrorism against the American people, only the methods are different. bin laden and about 30 of his leadership minions have been brought to justice. The military tribunal of ksm and his associates is underway at Gitmo now. Will the ceo's and boards of directors of wall street ever be brought to justice, will they ever be held accountable for their crimes? This from HuffPost.....
They're missing the point. When CEO Jamie Dimon announced that JPMorgan Chase had incurred at least $2 billion in losses from risky, unsecured, derivatives-types trading, it uncovered the scandal of our time once and for all.
The Chase disaster gives us a much-needed a glimpse into our corrupt political system, its Wall Street paymasters, and the media voices that allow people like Dimon to escape scrutiny.
The JPMorgan Chase story is the story behind the financial crisis that has thrown millions of people out of work. It's the story behind our ever-growing wealth inequity. It's the story behind Washington's inability to prosecute criminal bankers, regulate reckless ones, and propose the economic solutions the rest of us urgently need.
Predictably, the pundits who aid and abet people like Jamie Dimon are dismissing this story's importance, pointing out that $2 billion (it could become much more) pales against the $19 billion in profit Chase reported last year.
But it was potentially $2 billion earned through crime. And more importantly, this story isn't just about Chase's errors and crimes. It's much bigger than that.
Besides, $19 billion in a single year? That's a big part of the story, too.
The Case Against Chase, its CEO, and its accomplices is too big to cover all at once. Here are the aspects of this under-reported story we plan to address in the days and weeks to come.
The Firm
Depending on the day and the measurement used, JPMorgan Chase is now the largest or second-largest bank in the world. Its Japan operation alone has been cited by that nation's regulators as a systemic risk because of its size.
If Chase began to collapse because of risky betting, the government would be forced to step in again.
Jamie Dimon knows that. It's a lot easier to gamble when you know somebody else will be forced to bail you out if you lose too much.
Chase, like the other mega-banks, has systematically engaged in criminal activity for years. At the same time, it has used its vast wealth to corrupt our political and regulatory systems. And it has been aided and abetted by willing collaborators in the media, every step of the way. It gave up nearly three quarters of a billion dollars in settlements and surrendered fees to settle one case alone -- that of bribery and corruption in Jefferson County, Alabama.
Chase has paid out billions to settle charges that include perjury and forgery (in its systemic foreclosure fraud and abuse), investor fraud, and sale of unregistered securities. And these charges were for actions that took place while Jamie Dimon was the CEO.
The first of Dimon's executives have offered their resignations in this latest scandal. But investigations of everyone from Lucky Luciano onward have focused on the boss, not just the underlings. Laws like the Securities Act and Sarbanes-Oxley provide strict legal guidelines for corporate CEOs and their staff. There's strong evidence to suggest those laws have been stretched to the breaking point -- and beyond.
The Boss
We may someday look back at Jamie Dimon's increasingly shrill cries of persecution as a cry for help or a plea to be caught. He has not only fought the regulation of Wall Street banks. He's used extreme language to characterize criticisms of bank activities as a) mean, b) an attack on all forms of business, and c) bigotry that is no different from racism.
Dimon has used his visibility -- and his lavish public relations budget -- to obtain highly flattering profiles of himself in major U.S. publications. And he's used that public platform for, among other things, arguing for unwise ideas in public policy areas where he has no expertise. Most of those ideas involve forcing the American people to suffer additional financial hardship in order to pay for the damage caused by Dimon and his colleagues.
Just last week Dimon was arguing for the "Simpson/Bowles plan" authored by two private individuals, which would impose the same kind of austerity on the United States as that which is currently wreaking economic and political havoc on Europe.
If nothing else, Dimon is consistent: He can't respond to reality any more effectively in the policy arena than he can in the banking sector.
Dimon argues against regulation by saying that bankers are moral and sophisticated enough to manage their businesses without oversight. But he's been making those arguments to a nation that's standing in the wreckage his colleagues left behind the last time they were allowed to play with trillions without adult supervision.
And he has somehow managed to argue simultaneously that no other bankers are as smart as he is, and that nevertheless they should be unregulated because guys like him are so smart. That doesn't make sense.
The Flacks
Despite Dimon's illogic and the criminal track record of his organization, he has been flattered, quoted, and profiled in major news publications at roughly the same frequency as Lindsay Lohan has been in entertainment mags, and for the same reason: He makes good copy if you don't dig too deeply.
The day before the scandal broke, in fact, Dimon punked CBS host David Gregory on Meet the Press by pontificating on political and other matters in a pre-taped interview, knowing that this story was about to break tomorrow. We won't knock Dimon for not breaking the story (there are rules about handling information at a publicly traded company, although Dimon never seems to have cared much about them before.)
But it was an embarrassment to Gregory just the same.
The flackery didn't start after this story broke. The supposedly 'hardball' coverage of this '"error" typically amounted to little more than the kind of damage control Dimon and his PR team were no doubt hoping they'd get. The incident was described as an "embarrassment," a "mistake," an "error."
Few news outlets discussed the size of JPMorgan Chase and other too-big-to-fail banks, which continued to grow even after the passage of a financial reform law. They failed to discuss what would happen if the bank got into serious trouble.
And they glided lightly over the fact that crimes may have been committed. When they did, they were quick to characterize this scandal as the work of overzealous or crooked underlings.
That's what they said in Alabama, too.
The Influence Peddlers

Banks have paid Washington lobbyists $50-60 million per year for the last few years -- and they've gotten their money's worth.
Real financial reform was hamstrung under Dodd/Frank by behind-the-scenes wheeling and dealing. Even that bill's modest reforms are being undercut by Republicans from Mitt Romney downward, who are determined to avoid even the pretense of regulating the nation's reckless and criminal bank enterprises.
The White House had yet to indict a single banker for the events leading up to the financial crisis, although billions have been paid out it settlement fees for criminal activity.
When you look at it in context, $150-200 million over three years is one of the best investments Wall Street has ever made.
The Watchdogs
The Federal Reserve rescues failed bank executives -- often breaking its own rules to do it -- and yet cites the same rules when it refuses to help other businesses, or individual consumers, in ways that would do much more to restore the economy. No wonder: The Fed's board includes many of the same bankers who broke the economy -- including Jamie Dimon.
Intransigent pro-bank regulators refuse to carry out their own agencies' mandates if it would discommode Wall Street.
And Administration officials meet routinely with double-dealing bankers like Lloyd Blankfein from Goldman Sachs, according to visitor logs, while rarely laying eyes on foreclosed homeowners or other ordinary citizens.
Some of the bank executives they meet with are their own colleagues. There are so many people moving from Wall Street jobs to high government positions -- and back again -- that our country's center of economic power now resides somewhere on the Amtrak route between New York and Washington. (I'm guessing Metropark, NJ.)
The Solutions
Some people have called for reasonable steps in the wake of this scandal: Tighten banking regulations. Strengthen the Volcker rule. Restore Glass-Steagall.
Each of these moves would be a start -- but they would only be a start. But the story of Jamie Dimon and JPMorgan Chase illustrates a far deeper, far more systemic problem. They highlight the broken and corrupt matrix of relationships between rich (and often lawbreaking) bankers, politicians and regulators in Washington, and supplicating figures in the national media.
This is an opportunity to explain what's wrong with our system and pursue ways of fixing it. Let's seize the moment now -- before it's too late and they break the economy again.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rj-eskow/jamie-dimons-jpmorgan-cha_b_1515185.html?utm_source=Alert-blogger&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Email%2BNotifications
Posted by Bucknackt at 18:14 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: al qaeda, bank-financial cabal, criminal bankers, federal reserve, financial meltdown, Glass-Steagall, jamie dimon, jp morgan chase, recession, terrorism, Volker rule

30 December 2011

HARRY DENT OF HS DENT ON NIGHTLY BUSINESS REPORT, BEARISH ON THE ECONOMY 29DEZ11

A very sobering outlook for 2012 from a guest on the PBS Nightly Business Report....I hope he is wrong.
GHARIB:   Our guest tonight is bearish on the U.S. economy and the
stock market for 2012 and he`s predicting a recession in the New Year. He`s
Harry Dent, president of HS Dent.  That`s an economic research firm. And
he`s author of the new book, "The Great Crash Ahead."  Harry, welcome to
NIGHTLY BUSINESS REPORT.  Nice to have you with us.

HARRY DENT, PRESIDENT, HS DENT:  Nice to be here.

GHARIB:   So you heard our report. There are some economic statistics
that have been improving but I take it you don`t buy that?   Why are you so
bearish?

DENT:  We look at demographics that really predict consumer trends
before they happen and not afterwards and the story has been baby boomers
would continue to spend more money in 2007 -- which they did -- they would
start to plateau in their spending, start to slow, 2008 and 11 but 2012 on
we entered a declining phase as peoples` kids are getting out of their nest
and they`re saving for retirement.  So this stimulus is not going to keep
the economy going and it`s already been struggling thus far. So, yeah, we
see, by the second quarter of 2012, the economy is going to slow again and
the stimulus back from QE2, which ended in June of 2011 is going to wear
off and we`re going to be back down to zero growth or lower.

GHARIB:   Would any kind of new stimulus from the Federal Reserve in
the New Year help?  A lot of investors on Wall Street are counting on that
to happen. Will it make a difference?

DENT:  It makes a difference immediately for the stock market. Stock
market here in QE3, they`re going to go up.   But the economy feels it
about eight to 10 months later if you look back at the past.  So if the Fed
does stimulate, let`s say in the second quarter, I think it will be that
long because the economy is stronger as we expected here, it will be too
late because it won`t hit until the end of the year after the election. So
I think the Fed is kind of trapped here. Europe is breaking down, moving
into recession. The Fed has been on hold on stimulus for now six months,
probably another two to three months. I think it could be too late by the
time they finally react.

GHARIB:   So what`s going to turn this around because you`re talking
about baby boomer demographics and a change in buying and spending habits.
That`s a real long-term trend so what can reverse this negative trajectory
that you`re talking about?

DENT:  You`re right, Susie, it is a long-term trend. We`re talking
2012 to 2020, trends slowing down an economy no matter what the Fed does.
One thing the government can do is to help restructure, encourage banks.
They only get assistance if they write down mortgages and business debt. We
have $42 trillion in private debt, three times the public debt, which most
people aren`t aware of.  If they write down that debt and get rewarded for
that, it would take a trillion, trillion and a half a year alone off of
consumers and business and that would free up purchasing power at a time
when demographics trends say we`re going to slow otherwise.

GHARIB:   Harry, let`s move on and talk about the stock market because
you`re also bearish about the outlook for 2012.  Tell us why.

DENT:  We`ve been seeing a Santa Claus rally coming here in late
December, maybe early January. We think we`re near the end of that and that
basically stocks are getting ready to crash again, like they did in late
2008, early 2009. Remember, last time we had a crash, there was a first
downturn, early 2008, a bounce, and then it fell apart. I think between
January and the summer, high chances of another stock crash. So investors
need to get out of the way, out of all the risky assets -- commodities,
gold, silver, stocks, here and around the world -- and get in the safest
investments you can.

GHARIB:   Let me get your definition of a crash over the first six
months of the year.  How bad are things going to get?   What do you mean by
that?

DENT:  I think this is going to take another couple of years. But I
think in 2012, we could see it worse, that we retest the lows in early
2009. So that`s like 6440 on the Dow. That`s a big downturn. It may not be
that low if the government reacts sooner than later. But I do think that if
we see growth collapse again, the market`s going to lose faith. And again,
Europe is already moving into recession. Banks are dumping more
foreclosures on the market because they`re in trouble and that`s not
keeping home prices down. Again, I think you`re talking a 30, 40, 50
percent downside in the next year. This is not something to sit through.

GHARIB:   That`s a very provocative forecast. We appreciate you coming
on the program. You`ve given us a lot to think about. Thanks so much,
Harry. Happy New Year to you. We`ve been talking with Harry Dent.  He`s
economist and author of "The Great Crash Ahead."
Posted by Bucknackt at 11:01 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: 2012, bearish economy, Europe, federal reserve, Harry Dent, PBS Nightly Business Report, recession, stimulus, stock crash

08 October 2011

Bank Of America Debit Card Fee Leads To Legislative Response 3OKT11

bank of america is among the worst of the financial institutions sapping the chance of a economic recovery in the U.S. Their greed knows no bounds, here is their latest grab for your money, if you are foolish enough to bank with them. The story on HuffPost follows this call to action from the PCCC.....


Progressive Change Campaign Committee


Pressure Bank of AmericaPressure Bank of America
Click here to sign Rep. Brad Miller's "move your money" bill -- going on offense against Bank of America.
Last week, Bank of America announced they will charge a new $60-per-year fee to use debit cards on basic things like groceries. It will pad their profits by an estimated $2 billion.
In reaction, a TV host cut up her Bank of America card on the air.
Now, Congressman Brad Miller -- from Bank of America's home state of North Carolina -- is going on offense against Bank of America with legislation that would make it much easier for customers to switch banks.
To gain momentum, Miller needs other members of Congress to pile on this week.
Can you sign our petition urging your Representative and others to support Brad Miller's "move your money" bill? Click here.
When the new debit card fee was announced, Sen. Dick Durbin said, “Bank of America customers, vote with your feet, get the heck out of that bank."
A right-wing blogger wrote, "I actually agree with Durbin to a point." One person shared, "After 30 years of banking with Bank of America, today I walked into a local branch and asked to speak to the branch manager and closed every account."
But here's the catch -- Bank of America intentionally puts up obstacles to customers leaving.
In many states, walking into a bank branch isn't even enough! Miller's bill would change that -- allowing people to close accounts by phone or Internet, and have things like direct deposit transfer automatically.
Urge Congress to hold Bank of America accountable now. Sign here.
Across America, a simmering rage is coming to a boil against Wall Street greed.
The Occupy Wall Street movement has channeled this anger. Today, we're focusing it into a deep corporate accountability campaign against one of Wall Street's worst actors.
Rep. Miller's bill is just the first step. Later, we'll organize at local branches across the country and target Bank of America with hard-hitting ads.
But first, please sign our petition urging your Representative and others to support Brad Miller's "move your money" bill today. Click here.
We'll deliver this petition to Congress, and work with Rep. Miller to move his legislation forward. Thanks for being a bold progessive.
-- Kristiane Skolmen, Stephanie Taylor, Adam Green, Neil Sroka, and the PCCC team
P.S. On the petition page, you can also write a note to Occupy Wall Street protesters. Our staffer on the ground will personally deliver these notes to their General Assembly. Sign here.

Bank Of America Debit Card Fee Leads To Legislative Response

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/30/bank-of-america-fee_n_992623.html
WASHINGTON -- While demonstrators in New York are calling for an occupation of Wall Street, a new push by Democrats in Congress proposes a different tactic: Just walk away.
Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin and Rep. Brad Miller are going on the offensive against Bank of America after the financial behemoth cited Wall Street reform in announcing a new five dollar monthly debit charge last week. Miller, a Democrat from BofA's home state of North Carolina, plans to introduce legislation that would make it easy for consumers to switch banks and simultaneously swap their direct deposit, electronic bill paying and other automatic features that make moving money from one bank to another more hassle than it's often worth.
Illinois Democrat Dick Durbin, meanwhile, is encouraging consumers to abandon the bank's debit card. "My word to consumers across America is talk with your feet, look for a debit card that doesn't charge the Bank of America fee," Durbin told HuffPost, adding that the revenue from the new fee likely far outstrips what they'll lose to swipe fee reform. "It would be no surprise if we found out that Bank of America is overcharging consumers again. They've been found guilty of that in the past, but I really encourage consumers across America to look for competition that doesn't charge this fee, move their debit cards."
The Chicago Tribune, Durbin's home state paper, dubbed the BofA charge "the Durbin fee," which conservative blogs and Republicans have been happy to latch onto, arguing that the hike was a logical consequence of Durbin's swipe fee reform, which capped the fees banks could charge merchants for using debit cards.
On Saturday, the Federal Reserve instituted a 24 cent cap on swipe fees, estimating that running the card costs banks between 7 and 10 cents per swipe. The cap is roughly 20 cents lower than the average swipe fee had been previously.
Anne Pace, a Bank of America spokeswoman, noted that other banks are testing similar fees and that Regents and SunTrust are also hiking charges. "The price of a debit card was previously determined by the amount and type of transactions. We were able to pass some of these costs along to merchants, but because of regulatory changes, we are adjusting our pricing to reflect today’s economics," she told HuffPost.
On Friday, Durbin's office sent around a memo, obtained by HuffPost, to other senators who had supported his swipe fee amendment, telling them to reject the suggestion that swipe fee reform required BofA to raise fees. Banks raise fees no matter what, Durbin argued in defense, noting that they'd raised fees after the bailout.

The Electronic Payments Coalition, which represents banks in the swipe fee battle, hit back at Durbin. “It is astounding that Senator Durbin, who created today’s chaos, is now trying to point the finger at everyone but himself for the widely predicted consumer harm," spokeswoman Trish Wexler emailed to HuffPost.
"Senator Durbin has spent years pushing the agenda of giant retailers, while flatly ignoring repeated warnings by consumer advocates, economists, and regulators this type of consequence. The truth is that Senator Durbin knew that banks and credit unions across the board would have to raise prices. Instead of heeding our warnings and protecting consumers, he chose to put millions of dollars into the pockets of giant retailers.”
Miller's bill represents a chance to go on offense. Durbin told HuffPost it's something he could get behind, though he has yet to see the legislative language. "I've worked with Brad, he's come up with some pretty good ideas and I like the concept very much," Durbin said. "We've got to give consumers an opportunity for creating competition in the banking industry. Right now that is very difficult, we've got to make it easier."
The system in place today makes it difficult to switch accounts. But it doesn't have to be that way. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation regularly takes over failing banks on Friday afternoons and converts them to new banks by Monday morning, using software that makes sure not a single customer misses an automatic bill pay or a direct deposit. Miller's bill would require banks to make it as easy as technologically possible to switch accounts, and would forbid practices aimed at keeping consumers locked in.
Miller had been studying the legislation for at least a year, he said, but decided to pull the trigger after BofA's $5 fee was instituted. It is at heart a free-market reform, he said, and was inspired by HuffPost's Move Your Money campaign that unfolded after the bailout.
“If we can find a way to introduce real competition into banking, that'd do more than any regulation," Miller told HuffPost. "The biggest banks have turned the switch for market forces to the off position. If consumers could shop around for banks the way they can for everything else, banks wouldn’t think they had a God-given right to pay their executives vulgar bonuses and still make enormous profits, and consumers would get a much better deal."
Due to Republican-controlled redistricting, Miller faces a difficult primary against Democratic Rep. David Price if he hopes to remain in Congress, as both have been stuffed into the same district.
Legislation and regulation without a free market will ultimately fail, Miller said, and will lead to endless new fees as banks replace revenue lost to consumer protections with new charges. Without a real free market, consumers won't be able to respond the way they normally would.
Durbin noted that small banks and credit unions that are able, under Durbin's amendment, to charge higher swipe fees, should use that revenue to provide free debit cards that could win market share from BofA. "The community banks and credit unions that are exempt from this ought to step in with a zero charge debit card. At that point, it could be interesting. We could actually have some competition over debit cards," he said.
"In any other line of business, companies would be reluctant to raise their fees for fear of losing customers. That fear doesn't seem to be present in the banking industry," Miller said.
Even without the increased competition from Miller's bill, BofA's fee may not last. In January 2010, TCF Bank, which pioneered free checking in the 1980s, announced it would begin charging a monthly fee in response to Fed rules restricting overdraft charges. The move was regularly cited during the 2010 swipe fee fracas as evidence of the harm that would befall consumers if Durbin didn't back off. This January, TCF brought back free checking after losing customers.
One day before the Senate was expected to vote on delaying swipe fee reform in June, Chase went one step further: Thanks to the Durbin amendment, thousands of Chase customers were warned, your kid can forget about that trip to Disney World. "Congress recently enacted a new law known as the Durbin Amendment that significantly impacts debit cards," reads the letter. "As a result of this law, we will be changing our debit rewards program. After July 21, 2011 you will no longer earn Disney Dream Reward Dollars when you use your Disney Rewards Debit Card."
Durbin said that the fee is part of the bank's lobbying strategy to undo swipe fee reform. "I expect the banking industry to continue to kick and scream over this...They just happen to think they can win the day, ultimately, in Congress if they keep the pressure up," he said. "I'm not going to shed any tears for Bank of America. They made some awful decisions when it came to mortgages that jeopardized the future of their bank. They've had problems with profitability and losses leading up to this moment and for them to blame this law, which finally puts an end to the monopoly they had on swipe fees, it just doesn't bear up under close inspection."
Miller, in a letter to House colleagues, describes ways in which the legislation makes it easier to switch accounts:
The Freedom and Mobility in Consumer Banking Act makes the following changes and clarifications to existing law: Increases competition among banks by guaranteeing consumers the right to close a personal checking or savings account:
• Provides consumers the right to close an account at no charge
• Provides consumer the right to close an account at any time, regardless of whether the balance is positive, zero, or negative
• Provides consumer the right to close an account in person, by phone, or by other remote means as may be prescribed by regulation
Prohibits abusive fees and charges:
• Prohibits fees or charges from being assessed to an account after receiving a request to close an account
Requires banks to take reasonable steps to facilitate account closures:
• Requires institutions to notify consumers of preauthorized and recurring debits that hit their account for 30 days after a qualified account is closed
• Requires institutions to remit the balance in a closed account to the customer’s new account electronically if the consumer chooses
Prohibits banks from blacklisting consumers for failing to satisfy bank-generated fees assessed to an account at time of closure:
• Provides that consumers shall be given at least 30 days to remit payment for an account that is closed with a negative balance before the institution can initiate any collection activity, or reporting to a third party
• Provides that where an account is closed with a negative balance that is exclusively the result of overdraft or other fees assessed to the account by the depository institution, the institution may not report the account as delinquent to ChexSystems or any similar specialty consumer reporting service.

HuffPosts's Zach Carter contributed reporting.
This article has been updated to include a statement from the Electronic Payments Coalition.
Posted by Bucknackt at 12:04 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: bank of america, corporate greed, debit cards, federal reserve, move your money, PCCC, Rep Brad Miller D NC, Sen Richard Durbin D IL, swipe fees, wall street

07 August 2011

Money Still Owed In Federal Bailout: $1.5 Trillion Still Owed to Treasury, Federal Reserve 3AUG11

WELL if this doesn't piss you off I don't know what will. While we all stewed about the looming financial crisis and a double dip recession and the negotiations over raising the federal debt ceiling this report shows there's $1.5 TRILLION owed to the government, to us, the taxpayers by recipients of federal bailout funds!!!!! The President and Congress are cutting funding for vital social safety net programs and vital government funding for all levels of education, food safety, the EPA, health care, and more while no doubt many of these companies and institutions have lavished obscene bonuses and pay increases on their top executives! This from BANKSTER (banker + gangster), be sure to click the links in the story for more in depth reports...
Submitted by Mary Bottari 
A new study released today by the Center for Media and Democracy (CMD) shows that, despite rosy statements about the bailout's impending successful conclusion from federal government officials, $1.5 trillion of the $4.8 trillion in federal bailout funds are still outstanding.
The analysis, presented in charts and an online table and program profiles, is based entirely on government records. This comprehensive assessment of the bailout goes beyond the relatively small Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) program to look at the rest of the Treasury and Federal Reserve’s multi-trillion dollar response to the financial crisis. It shows that while the TARP bailout of Wall Street (not including the bailout of the auto industry) amounted to $330 billion, the government also quietly spent $4.4 trillion more in efforts to stave off the collapse of the financial and mortgage lending sectors. The majority of these funds ($3.9 trillion) came from the Federal Reserve, which undertook the actions citing an obscure section of its charter.
“In order to understand the big picture on the bailout, you have to look beyond TARP and examine the trillions the Federal Reserve has disbursed to keep the big banks above water. $4.8 trillion went out the door to aid financial companies and repair the damage they caused to financial markets, and $1.5 trillion of that is still outstanding,” said Mary Bottari, director of CMD’s Real Economy Project.
TOTAL WALL STREET BAILOUT COST TABLE: You can click here to see our a full list of each bailout program, the amount of money disbursed and the amount of money outstanding in each program.
Most of the bailout funds were comprised of aid to banks – the peak outstanding amount was $2.2 trillion in January 2009 – which took place at the height of the financial crisis in the form of loans with below-market interest rates and for questionable collateral to banks directly from the Treasury and Federal Reserve.

Mortgage-Backed Securities Purchases

CMD’s study also shows how the government is continuing to prop up the same banks that caused the crisis in its attempt to help the housing market. The government’s housing program – which peaked at $1.6 trillion outstanding in July 2010 – is aimed at keeping mortgage lending flowing by subsidizing deals Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac make with the banks. Treasury and the Federal Reserve’s main approach has been to buy more than a trillion dollars worth of mortgage-backed securities from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac so that the two government-sponsored enterprises can continue to purchase and bundle mortgages from the banks, which they sell to Fannie and Freddie at a profit. The banks also benefit from the hundreds of billions in direct loans the government has made to Fannie and Freddie, which the GSEs then turn around and make in insurance pay-outs to banks for mortgages that have gone bad.
This massive effort is in stark contrast to the mere $2 billion the Treasury has spent to directly help homeowners stay in their homes via the widely criticized Home Affordable Mortgage Program (HAMP) program. With housing prices continuing to falter and the United States approaching 9.2 million foreclosure filings since the beginning of 2008, HAMP can be described as nothing less than an abject failure.
“The Federal Reserve and the Treasury have spent $1.6 trillion in a bank-shot to save the mortgage lending market by using the same financial companies that got us into this mess,” said Conor Kenny, lead author of the study. “That’s more than 800 times what they’ve spent directly to keep homeowners in their houses, and the banks have made money off the whole thing.”
CMD’s analysis also shows how the $4.8 trillion bailout of the financial sector dwarfs the $600 billion that the Federal Reserve spent on the much-hyped “Quantitative Easing 2” of 2010-2011 that was intended to help the broader economy – not just the financial sector – by lowering interest rates across the board and preventing deflation.
 
Posted by Bucknackt at 20:11 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Center for Media and Democracy CMD, CMD, federal reserve, govt bailout, TARP, US Treasury, wall street

10 June 2011

THE ECONOMY We’re Halfway to a Lost Decade 8JUN11& The Economy is Worse Than You Think 9JUN11

HERE'S a chart showing what george w bush and his cabal really did to the economy, from Freakonomics & MOJO...

Justin Wolfers
 
Our current slump began a lot earlier than you think. Which means that we’re half way to a lost decade.
Many people date the financial crisis as beginning when Lehman collapsed in September 2008.  But the economy was already in recession. The NBER reckons the recession began in December 2007. But look closely, and you’ll see that it may have begun a year earlier.
That’s the case I made in my latest my latest Marketplace commentary, which you can listen to here. The point is more easily made with a simple graph:

The blue line is the usual measure of GDP, which is obtained by adding up total spending. When you read the newspapers, this is the number they report. But the Fed’s Jeremy Nailewaik has convincingly shown that red line—which is the sum of all income—is the more reliable measure.  In theory the two lines should be identical—one person’s spending is another’s income—but in practice, the measurements differ. I’ve also plotted the peak, trough, and latest reading of each measure.
Focus on the red line, and you’ll see that the recession began in the final quarter of 2006, not the end of 2007. The red line also fell by more, and over a longer period. And today, GDP remains below its levels nearly five years ago. The economy had already run out of steam halfway through Bush’s second term. That’s why I say we are halfway to a lost decade.
Even this isn’t a fair comparison, as the population has continued to grow. So let’s transform these into per capita numbers:

The red line now shows five things much more clearly:
1.      The slump began in late 2006. And indeed, we were hardly enjoying good times through early 2006.
2.      It’s a big slump, and GDP per capita fell by over 7 percent.
3.      We remain a long way below the previous peak.
4.      It’s going to take a long while to return to where we were back in 2006. Most forecasters are expecting GDP to grow by around 3 percent, implying per-capita growth closer to two percent. At those rates, average incomes in 2013 will (finally!) be back around the levels of 2006.
Finally, it’s worth emphasizing another key statistical finding from Nalewaik’s research: Over the next few years the Bureau of Economic Analysis will continue to revise their estimates of what has happened, and if history is any guide, their revised estimates of the blue line will look a lot more like the red line.

Chart of the Day: The Economy is Worse Than You Think


http://motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2011/06/chart-day-economy-worse-you-think 
The Fed’s Jeremy Nalewaik argues that a measure of GDP using income levels is a more reliable guide to the actual business cycle than the traditional measure of GDP using spending. If that's true, says Justin Wolfers, the recession started nearly five years ago and was much deeper than we think: GDP per capita dropped 7% and is still well below its pre-recession level.
And what are we doing about this? Pretty much nothing. Apparently we're content to follow Japan into oblivion.

Posted by Bucknackt at 08:26 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: federal reserve, Freakonomics, GDP income measure, GDP per Capita, GDP spending measure, george w bush, Jeremy Nalewaik, Justin Wolfers, recession, U.S. GDP

25 March 2011

BOHICA!!! Who Screwed the Middle Class? 25MAR11

BOHICA working and middle class America! This from Mother Jones explaining why unemployment and economic inequality are government policy....
I've written several times before about Winner-Take-All Politics, in which Jacob Hacker and Paul Pierson argue that middle-class wage stagnation and growing income inequality are due as much to political decisions over the past 30 years as they are to broad economic trends. I find their arguments persuasive, but there's no question that it's a tough case to make. After all, exactly which political decisions are we talking about? Can we point to specific pieces of legislation or specific agency decisions that have retarded wage growth? In fact, we can—things like tax policy, financial deregulation, the decline of antitrust enforcement, and anti-union rulings by the NLRB all played a role. By themselves, though, these just aren't enough to account for what's happened. So what's the smoking gun when it comes to the impact of politics on wage stagnation and growing income inequality?
I think Lane Kenworthy fingered the right culprit a few weeks ago: the abandonment in recent decades of full employment as even a rhetorical goal of American economic policy:
The post–World War II experiences of the rich democracies suggest three routes to rising working- and middle-class wages. One is an environment in which firms face only moderate competition in product markets and limited pressure from shareholders, allowing them to pass on a significant share of growth to their employees. This characterized the period from the late 1940s through the mid 1970s, but it’s now long gone. The second is strong unions. I see little hope of that in America’s future. The third is full employment.
But full employment is only possible if the Federal Reserve is committed to it, and this is decidedly no longer the case: "Since the late 1970s, independent central banks such as the Fed almost always have prioritized low inflation, rendering low unemployment difficult to achieve. If the Fed isn’t on board, even a workable plan for full employment supported by the American public and our elected officials probably won’t be enough."
Following the stagflation of the 70s, conservatives decisively took over Fed policy and put it in the service of the wealthy, prioritizing low inflation over low unemployment and tacitly promising bailouts whenever Wall Street found itself in danger (a practice charmingly known as the "Greenspan put"). Matt Yglesias has a useful piece in Democracy this month arguing that progressives need to take the Fed far more seriously if we ever want to have any chance of reversing this:
Central banks and monetary policy are the primary determinant of short-term economic conditions—of the unemployment rate, and thus of workers’ ability to bargain for wages. This is, clearly, a hugely important subject in its own right. But it’s also a critical determinant of overall political conditions.
....But when Barack Obama was elected in 2008, he rather hastily chose to reappoint [Ben] Bernanke, creating a situation in which no Democrat has held the most important domestic policy job in the land since 1987. He inherited two vacancies on the Board of Governors that he left open for over a year, only putting names forward after a third vacancy emerged in 2010....Of course, no one can know for sure what the Fed would have done had Obama picked someone other than Bernanke to chair it or filled the vacancies more rapidly. But it’s certainly plausible that different personnel would have led to swifter and more forceful moves toward monetary stimulus, a more rapid end to the recession, and a lower unemployment rate.
A lot has happened over the past 30 years, but if you're looking for a single political sea change that's had the biggest impact on middle class wages—more important than union decline, more important than NAFTA, more important than the end of Glass-Steagall—it's the political consensus that underlies the Fed's reluctance to allow labor markets to stay tight enough to generate wage increases in the real economy. And it's something we're seeing all over again right now, as the DC chattering classes have almost unanimously decided that inflation is our real enemy right now, even though core inflation is running around 1% and unemployment is still near 9%.
This is a policy beloved of the business community, which prefers loose labor markets that keep wages low and executive compensation high, but it hasn't always been the Fed's policy and it's not written in stone that it has to be now. Tight labor markets and rising middle-class wages are, to a large extent, a choice we make. Politics took them away 30 years ago, and politics can return them to us if we want.
Front page image: Celine Nadeau

If You Liked This, You Might Also Like...

  • It's the Inequality, Stupid

    Eleven charts that explain everything that's wrong with America.
  • Republicans and the Fed

  • The Fed and You

  • The Federal Reserve Passes the Buck—and Prints a Trillion More

  • Reagan's Toll on the Middle Class

Kevin Drum is a political blogger for Mother Jones. For more of his stories, click here. Get Kevin Drum's RSS feed.
Posted by Bucknackt at 09:07 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: ben bernanke, central banks, economic inequality, federal reserve, gop, govt bailout, Iinflation, Matt Yglesias, middle class, tea-baggers, unemployment, wall street, working class

03 December 2010

A Real Jaw Dropper at the Federal Reserve 2NOV10

THE greed in this country is disgusting; corporations and banks, foreign and domestic, feeding at the corporate and financial welfare trough on taxpayer funds while the poor, working class and middle class can't get a break, can't get mortgages refinanced, can't get tax relief (unless the rich get more than them), can't get an extension on unemployment, can't get adequate funding for jobs training and relocation support. So thanks to Sen Bernie Sanders I VT we are getting more proof of how corporate and financial America and international financial institutions have been controlling and manipulating the American Federal Government and the American Federal Reserve. It is jaw dropping, absolutely amazing. Unfortunately, with the results of Novembers mid-term elections and the gop and tea-baggers running the House for the benefit of the plutocrats of Republicorp we can only expect more attempts of the same.....so BOHICA!
 
At a Senate Budget Committee hearing in 2009, I asked Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke to tell the American people the names of the financial institutions that received an unprecedented backdoor bailout from the Federal Reserve, how much they received, and the exact terms of this assistance. He refused. A year and a half later, as a result of an amendment that I was able to include in the Wall Street reform bill, we have begun to lift the veil of secrecy at the Fed, and the American people now have this information.
It is unfortunate that it took this long, and it is a shame that the biggest banks in America and Mr. Bernanke fought to keep this secret from the American public every step of the way. But, the details on this bailout are now on the Federal Reserve's website, and this is a major victory for the American taxpayer and for transparency in government.
Importantly, my amendment also required the Government Accountability Office to conduct a top-to-bottom audit of all of the emergency lending the Fed provided during the financial crisis to be completed on July 21, 2011, which will take a hard look at all of the potential conflicts of interest that took place with respect to this bailout. So, in many respects, details that the Fed was forced to divulge on Wednesday about the $3.3 trillion in emergency loans that until now were totally kept from public scrutiny, marked the beginning, not the end, of lifting the veil of secrecy at the Fed.
After years of stonewalling by the Fed, the American people are finally learning the incredible and jaw-dropping details of the Fed's multi-trillion-dollar bailout of Wall Street and corporate America. As a result of this disclosure, other members of Congress and I will be taking a very extensive look at all aspects of how the Federal Reserve functions and how we can make our financial institutions more responsive to the needs of ordinary Americans and small businesses.
What have we learned so far from the disclosure of more than 21,000 transactions? We have learned that the $700 billion Wall Street bailout signed into law by President George W. Bush turned out to be pocket change compared to the trillions and trillions of dollars in near-zero interest loans and other financial arrangements the Federal Reserve doled out to every major financial institution in this country. Among those are Goldman Sachs, which received nearly $600 billion; Morgan Stanley, which received nearly $2 trillion; Citigroup, which received $1.8 trillion; Bear Stearns, which received nearly $1 trillion, and Merrill Lynch, which received some $1.5 trillion in short term loans from the Fed.
We also learned that the Fed's multi-trillion bailout was not limited to Wall Street and big banks, but that some of the largest corporations in this country also received a very substantial bailout. Among those are General Electric, McDonald's, Caterpillar, Harley Davidson, Toyota and Verizon.
Perhaps most surprising is the huge sum that went to bail out foreign private banks and corporations including two European megabanks -- Deutsche Bank and Credit Suisse -- which were the largest beneficiaries of the Fed's purchase of mortgage-backed securities.
Deutsche Bank, a German lender, sold the Fed more than $290 billion worth of mortgage securities. Credit Suisse, a Swiss bank, sold the Fed more than $287 billion in mortgage bonds.
Has the Federal Reserve of the United States become the central bank of the world?
The Fed said that this bailout was necessary to prevent the world economy from going over a cliff. But three years after the start of the recession, millions of Americans remain unemployed and have lost their homes, life savings and ability to send their kids to college. Meanwhile, big banks and corporations have returned to making huge profits and paying their executives record-breaking compensation packages as if the financial crisis they started never happened.
What this disclosure tells us, among many other things, is that despite this huge taxpayer bailout, the Fed did not make the appropriate demands on these institutions necessary to rebuild our economy and protect the needs of ordinary Americans.
For example, at a time when big banks have nearly a trillion dollars in excess reserves parked at the Fed, the Fed did not require these institutions to increase lending to small- and medium-sized businesses as a condition of the bailout.
At a time when large corporations are more profitable than ever, the Fed did not demand that corporations that received this backdoor bailout create jobs and expand the economy once they returned to profitability.
I intend to investigate whether these secret Fed loans, in some cases, turned out to be direct corporate welfare to big banks that used these loans not to reinvest in the economy but rather to lend back to the federal government at a higher rate of interest by purchasing Treasury Securities. Instead of using this money to reinvest in the productive economy, I suspect a large portion of these near-zero interest loans were used to buy Treasury Securities at a higher interest rate providing free money to some of the largest financial institutions in this country. That is something that we have got to closely examine.
At a time when Wall Street executives are now making more money than before the financial crisis, how many big banks that paid back TARP funds in 2009 to avoid limits on executive compensation received no-strings-attached loans from the Federal Reserve?
At a time when millions of Americans are paying outrageously high credit card interest rates, why didn't the Fed require credit card issuers to lower interest rates as a condition of the bailout?
The four largest banks in this country (Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup) issue half of all mortgages in this country. We now know that these banks received hundreds of billions from the Fed. How many Americans could have remained in their homes, if the Fed required these bailed-out banks to reduce mortgage payments as a condition of receiving these secret loans?
We have begun to lift the veil of secrecy at one of most important agencies in our government. What we are seeing is the incredible power of a small number of people who have incredible conflicts of interest getting incredible help from the taxpayers of this country while ignoring the needs of the people.
Follow Sen. Bernie Sanders on Facebook.
 
Follow Sen. Bernie Sanders on Twitter: www.twitter.com/senatorsanders
  • The Fed
  • Ben Bernanke
  • The Bailouts
  • Financial Crisis
At a Senate Budget Committee hearing in 2009, I asked Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke to tell the American people the names of the financial institutions that received an unprecedented backdoor bailout from...
At a Senate Budget Committee hearing in 2009, I asked Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke to tell the American people the names of the financial institutions that received an unprecedented backdoor bailout from...
Related News On Huffington Post:
Wall Street Banks In Talks To Settle SEC Lawsuit Over CDOs

As the government hunts for conflicts of interest at Wall Street banks that peddled investments which contributed to the worst financial collapse since the Great...
Bernie Sanders Blasts Wall Street, Government In Wake Of Fed Disclosures (VIDEO)

Self-avowed socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) blasted the nation's major financial institutions and the government's failure to hold them accountable in a Wednesday-night appearance on...
Bailouts Are For Banks: Unemployed People Get Zilch

In Washington, the agenda has long since moved on from bailing out megabanks to figuring out how to stop paying for things that regular people...
Fed Directors Banks Lavished With Billions From Fed

The Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta made six major loans to SunTrust Banks at the height of the financial crisis totaling at least $7.5 billion....
Posted by Bucknackt at 13:15 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: ben bernanke, BOHICA, corporate greed, corporate welfare, deception, federal reserve, financial regulatory reform, gop, manipulation, Sen Bernie Sanders I VT, TARP, tea-baggers, wall street
Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Translate

Search This Blog

About Me

My photo
Bucknackt
Ashburn, VA, United States
Love my family & friends, the outdoors, camping, hiking, wandering in the woods or on the beach, concerts at Wolf Trap, the Smithsonians and the Mall in D.C. Enjoy all kinds of music except rap and scat jazz. Read a lot, history and politics, murder mysteries, crime and espionage books. Love PBS and NPR and yes, I support my local stations each year. And bears....I love bears! And my name, Bucknackt? It is from an episode of Seinfeld...Jerry and George are talking about porn and George said if he was ever a porn star his screen name would be Buck Naked. That just struck me as hysterical...so I made it my screen name, auf Deutsch!
View my complete profile

COSTOFWAR

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2026 (934)
    • ▼  September (41)
      • Trump claims firefighters carried him from ground ...
      • MOTHER JONES DAILY: A MAGA Activist Flooded Georgi...
      • DAILY REMINDER OF WHAT IS AT STAKE IN THE 2026 MID...
      • VERSE AND VOICE FROM SOJOURNERS 11SEP26
      • DHS Program Analyzes Americans' Finances to Flag D...
      • MUSIC VIDEO: CANADA-WE WILL SURVIVE 25FEB25 & 9SEP26
      • Here is Trump’s blueprint to rig the 2026 midterms...
      • Germany’s Far Right Tops Key State Race, but Falls...
      • UPDATE:Trump Officials Draft Plan to Pay At-Home P...
      • VERSE AND VOICE FROM SOJOURNERS 7AUG26
      • UPDATE: Donald Trump Makes a New 9/11 Claim 25 Yea...
      • Trump's plan to destroy protected forests & Trump ...
      • MOTHER JONES CLIMATE DESK WEEKLY: The Great Americ...
      • ALAN CHAMBERS, Winter Park businessman, former 'ga...
      • JUST A REMINDER, NO WHITE AFTER LABOR DAY, AND...
      • VERSE AND VOICE FROM SOJOURNERS 4SEP26
      • אלמנה פון לופטמאן וואס איז אומגעקומען אין עפּיק פי...
      • بیوه خلبان کشته شده در فیلم «خشم حماسی» از دریافت ...
      • אלמנתו של איש חיל האוויר שנהרג ב"זעם אפי" נמנעה מת...
      • رُفضت استحقاقات الوفاة لأرملة الطيار الذي قُتل في ...
      • Widow of airman killed in Epic Fury denied death b...
      • Deathly design gaffe spotted as Trump coin goes on...
      • UPDATE: JD Vance says the Antichrist may be among ...
      • MOTHER JONES DAILY:  ChatGPT took our stories. We'...
      • 2% yokha ya anthu aku Malawi anali ndi magetsi mu ...
      • Only 2% of Malawi had electricity in 2002, and a 1...
      • VIDÉO & Plus de 300 voitures de Via Rail seront co...
      • VIDEO & More than 300 Via Rail cars will be built ...
      • MOTHER JONES DAILY: Trump's "Lake America" bullyin...
      • 2026 MIDTERM ELECTIONS, we've got to finish the jo...
      • MOTHER JONES DAILY Meet the Tennessee rep who's fi...
      • VERSE AND VOICE FROM SOJOURNERS 3SEP26
      • The ACLU's most ambitious election protection prog...
      • VIDÉO - 16 000 fans chantent à tue-tête les parole...
      • VIDEO- 16,000 fans belt out Lake Ontario lyric at ...
      • VIDÉOS ET ARTICLES : Carney déclare que Trump et s...
      • VIDEOS & ARTICLES: Carney says Trump and his cabin...
      • AUDIO WITH LYRICS: DONA NOBIS PACEM, GIVE US PEACE...
      • MOTHER JONES CLIMATE WEEKLY: It Just Got Way Easie...
      • DID YOU KNOW THAT JELLYFISH.....
      • AUDIO: I Will Move On Up A Little Higher-Mahalia ...
    • ►  August (85)
    • ►  July (126)
    • ►  June (127)
    • ►  May (145)
    • ►  April (148)
    • ►  March (63)
    • ►  February (55)
    • ►  January (144)
  • ►  2025 (1143)
    • ►  December (168)
    • ►  November (31)
    • ►  October (80)
    • ►  September (178)
    • ►  August (140)
    • ►  July (156)
    • ►  June (156)
    • ►  May (81)
    • ►  April (46)
    • ►  March (38)
    • ►  February (24)
    • ►  January (45)
  • ►  2024 (484)
    • ►  December (58)
    • ►  November (73)
    • ►  October (77)
    • ►  September (22)
    • ►  August (156)
    • ►  July (24)
    • ►  June (31)
    • ►  May (37)
    • ►  April (6)
  • ►  2023 (110)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (14)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (9)
    • ►  August (15)
    • ►  July (34)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  March (19)
    • ►  February (8)
  • ►  2022 (87)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (36)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (25)
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2021 (200)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (23)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (9)
    • ►  August (26)
    • ►  July (24)
    • ►  June (26)
    • ►  May (9)
    • ►  April (9)
    • ►  March (25)
    • ►  February (10)
    • ►  January (26)
  • ►  2020 (952)
    • ►  November (28)
    • ►  October (18)
    • ►  September (29)
    • ►  August (91)
    • ►  July (79)
    • ►  June (73)
    • ►  May (39)
    • ►  April (76)
    • ►  March (125)
    • ►  February (129)
    • ►  January (265)
  • ►  2019 (249)
    • ►  December (91)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (28)
    • ►  August (16)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (9)
    • ►  May (13)
    • ►  April (7)
    • ►  March (20)
    • ►  February (22)
    • ►  January (38)
  • ►  2018 (546)
    • ►  November (60)
    • ►  October (56)
    • ►  September (73)
    • ►  August (51)
    • ►  July (52)
    • ►  June (37)
    • ►  May (21)
    • ►  April (32)
    • ►  March (46)
    • ►  February (65)
    • ►  January (53)
  • ►  2017 (556)
    • ►  December (33)
    • ►  November (58)
    • ►  October (58)
    • ►  September (33)
    • ►  August (24)
    • ►  July (27)
    • ►  June (30)
    • ►  May (42)
    • ►  April (73)
    • ►  March (101)
    • ►  February (72)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2016 (601)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (75)
    • ►  October (103)
    • ►  September (92)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  June (44)
    • ►  May (12)
    • ►  April (68)
    • ►  March (65)
    • ►  February (75)
    • ►  January (60)
  • ►  2015 (240)
    • ►  December (19)
    • ►  November (92)
    • ►  October (16)
    • ►  September (44)
    • ►  August (16)
    • ►  July (19)
    • ►  June (9)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  January (16)
  • ►  2014 (729)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (33)
    • ►  October (74)
    • ►  September (90)
    • ►  August (54)
    • ►  July (32)
    • ►  June (35)
    • ►  May (64)
    • ►  April (55)
    • ►  March (116)
    • ►  February (91)
    • ►  January (82)
  • ►  2013 (734)
    • ►  December (44)
    • ►  November (69)
    • ►  October (68)
    • ►  September (44)
    • ►  August (64)
    • ►  July (37)
    • ►  June (32)
    • ►  May (52)
    • ►  April (57)
    • ►  March (81)
    • ►  February (104)
    • ►  January (82)
  • ►  2012 (1000)
    • ►  December (66)
    • ►  November (75)
    • ►  October (110)
    • ►  September (130)
    • ►  August (106)
    • ►  July (77)
    • ►  June (46)
    • ►  May (50)
    • ►  April (102)
    • ►  March (102)
    • ►  February (69)
    • ►  January (67)
  • ►  2011 (1085)
    • ►  December (65)
    • ►  November (58)
    • ►  October (71)
    • ►  September (87)
    • ►  August (73)
    • ►  July (81)
    • ►  June (81)
    • ►  May (64)
    • ►  April (131)
    • ►  March (95)
    • ►  February (126)
    • ►  January (153)
  • ►  2010 (1021)
    • ►  December (120)
    • ►  November (119)
    • ►  October (121)
    • ►  September (72)
    • ►  August (126)
    • ►  July (115)
    • ►  June (70)
    • ►  May (84)
    • ►  April (54)
    • ►  March (68)
    • ►  February (62)
    • ►  January (10)

Pages

  • Home
  • FBI, CIA, NSA & TOP SECRET AMERICA / THE PERMANENT WAR: WASHINGTON POST INVESTIGATION
  • UPDATED 6AUG12 EVERY CLICK, EVERY MOVE YOU MAKE, SOMEONE IS WATCHING YOU from MOJO AND THE WALL STREET JOURNAL 13AUG10
  • ENVIRONMENT & CLIMATE CHANGE
  • SPEECHES BY KING, KENNEDY, OBAMA, EISENHOWER, & OTHERS & TOP 10 COMMENCEMENT SPEECHES (VIDEOS) updated 21APR12
  • THE BUSH - DRUMPF/TRUMP-PENCE - SAUDI CONNECTION & The 28 Missing Pages on 9/11 & The Twenty-Eight Pages 9SEP14 & THE بوش - اتصال السعودي وال 28 صفحات في عداد المفقودين في 9/11 والصفحات 9SEP14 الثامنة والعشرون
  • TEA-BAGGERS, RIGHT WING FANATICS, HATE GROUPS & NEO-NAZIS
  • update 1AUG13 Red Meat & REPUBLICORP: Vanity Fair’s Official 2010–11 Republican Beefcake Calendar & MEET YOUR 112TH CONGRESS
  • BEYOND THE BATTLEFIELD
  • Crossing the Racial Divide (Study and Discussion guide from Sojourners) 29MAR12
  • updated 28JUN13 TOO BIG TO FAIL LIES, PROPAGANDA, DECEPTION & GREED
  • THIS WEEK IN CIVIL LIBERTIES and Know Your Rights: CIVIL RIGHTS, VOTING RIGHTS, IMMIGRATION & What To Do If You're Stopped By Police, Immigration Agents or the FBI from the ACLU and others
  • updated 14MAR14 WAR COST/THE PERMANENT WAR/AFGHAN WAR DIARY & RETHINK AFGHANISTAN update 11JAN13, 2004-2010 from WIKILEAKS 25JUL10 & IRAQ WAR LOGS 2004-2009 from WIKILEAKS 22OKT10 & MORE FROM MOJO, IVAW & OTHERS
  • SOCIAL SECURITY, SOCIAL SAFETY NET & CLASS WARFARE

My Blog List

  • 24/7 Wall St.
    Top Insider Purchases in December Signal Market Confidence
    9 months ago
  • AL JAZEERA ENGLISH (AJE)
    Head of Smithsonian museums announces he will be stepping down
    3 days ago
  • Blog of Rights: Official Blog of the American Civil Liberties Union
    Another Problem With AI-Assisted Police Reports: Companies Can Have Incentives to Distort Their Content
    2 weeks ago
  • Crooks and Liars
    CNN Data Guru: Trump's Approval Rating With Working Americans In A Nosedive
    3 days ago
  • Daily Kos Elections
    Daily Kos Elections is now a new site, The Downballot
    2 years ago
  • Joe.My.God.
    Megyn Kelly: “There’s No Such Thing As Trans People”
    3 days ago
  • National: Breaking National News & Headlines - Washington Post
    Newsom signs strict social media protections for teens
    1 day ago
  • NationofChange
    Trump EPA proposes rule that would strip protection from most US streams and wetlands
    3 days ago
  • NPR Topics: Politics
    The 2026 midterm general election season is upon us. Here's what to watch
    3 days ago
  • On Faith - The Washington Post
    Jewish institutions see 33 percent jump in security spending after attacks
    1 week ago
  • PBS NewsHour Podcast | PBS
    Canadian tariffs on U.S. goods take effect, marking turning point in relations
    3 days ago
  • Post Local: Washington, DC Area News, Traffic, Weather, Sports & More - The Washington Post
    Middle school student killed in one of three same-day crashes in Virginia
    1 day ago
  • Post Politics: Breaking Politics News, Political Analysis & More - The Washington Post
    Honoring 9/11 heroes, Trump repeats disputed account of his role in recovery
    3 days ago
  • ProPublica: Articles and Investigations
    This State Is Spending More on Lethal Injections. A Law Tries to Keep the Details Secret.
    3 days ago
  • RealClearPolitics - Homepage
    A Jobs, Manufacturing Boost Just in Time for Midterms
    3 days ago
  • Right Wing Watch
    Roger Ailes
    1 year ago
  • Sojourners Latest Articles
    Will the U.S. Church Be Silent on Venezuela?
    8 months ago
  • Sojourners Magazine
    From the Editors: Fact-checking Woes and Wins
    2 weeks ago
Show 5 Show All

FAVORITE SITES

  • 538
  • 8 CHAINS NORTH Winery
  • ABDICATE CALENDAR CONVERSION
  • AFGHANISTAN: NO EXCUSES, END THE WAR
  • AMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE
  • AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL
  • ANCESTRY.COM SCHWANKE-IRVINE
  • BUCKNACKT'S SORDID & TAWDRY SITE
  • BUFFALO BILLS
  • CHARITY NAVIGATOR
  • CLIMATE PROGRESS
  • CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU
  • CORP EXECUTIVE PAYWATCH
  • CREDO MOBILE
  • CRUDE FIGHT FOR THE FIRST AMENDMENT
  • FILM HILL
  • FIRST GOV.GOV
  • GAMES THAT GIVE
  • GIVE IT BACK FOR JOBS
  • GOVTRACK.US
  • GREATFUL DEAD OFFICIAL SITE
  • GUN SHOW GALLERY
  • HOUSE6 BREWING
  • HUFFINGTON POST
  • HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST
  • IRAQ VETERANS AGAINST THE WAR
  • KIVA
  • LAND OF MAPS
  • LIBERATION THEOLOGY
  • LOST RHINO
  • MOTHER JONES
  • MOVE YOUR MONEY
  • MY KODAK GALLERIES
  • NATIONAL POPULAR VOTE
  • NPR COMMUNITY
  • OPEN SECRETS CAMPAIGN DONATIONS
  • PARSHALL INN
  • PARTICIPATORY POLITICS FOUNDATION
  • PATRIOTIC MILLIONAIRS FOR FISCAL STRENGTH
  • PEACE IT TOGETHER
  • PLAYING FOR CHANGE
  • PROGRESS DUE TO THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION
  • RECOVERY.GOV
  • REDDIT
  • REP JENNIFER WEXTON D VA 10TH CONG
  • SCANDIA COVENANT CHURCH
  • SEA SHEPHERD
  • SNOPES; URBAN LEGENDS AND MYTHS
  • SOJOURNERS
  • Spreading Santorum
  • SUNLIGHT FOUNDATION
  • THE RAW STORY
  • THOMAS / LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
  • UN UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
  • USWX
  • VA DEMOCRATIC PARTY
  • VOICE OF CHOICE
  • WAMU
  • WETA
  • WHO RUNS GOVERNMENT
  • WILLOWCROFT VINEYARDS
  • WTF?? WHAT THE HECK HAS OBAMA DONE SO FAR?????

Followers

Simple theme. Powered by Blogger.

Subscribe To

Posts
Atom
Posts
All Comments
Atom
All Comments