NORTON META TAG

Showing posts with label 1965 Voting Rights Act. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1965 Voting Rights Act. Show all posts

09 September 2026

Here is Trump’s blueprint to rig the 2026 midterms 8SEP26

 

I AM NOT AN ALARMIST. The neo-nazi fascist drumpf/trump-vance administration with the gop / greed over people-republican party, scotus, the fascist heritage foundation and right wing "religious" extremist are and have been opposed to our democratic Republic and want to replace it with an authoritarian theocratic oligarchy. If enough of us, the loyal opposition, turn out and vote in every precinct, community, and state we can save America. Remember, ELECTION DAY IS TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3RD, 2026! DEMOCRACY IS NOT A SPECTATOR SPORT! We need to make sure everyone who really loves our country votes. Remember to confirm you are registered to vote and your voting location information at Rock The Vote by Wednesday, 28 October 2026. You can also register to vote through Rock The Vote, check with them as soon as possible for the last date to register to vote in your state. NOTE-as long as you are in line to vote when the polls in your state close you will be able to vote and your vote will count! This from Democracy Docket.....



We are less than two months until Election Day for the most important midterms of our lifetime. Ballots have already started to be sent out. The threats to free and fair elections are real and growing more serious by the day. 

What once seemed like an abstract threat has now become concrete. The risk of a rigged election is no longer unthinkable. The need for action can no longer be delayed or denied.

I have often said that Donald Trump’s plan is to make it harder for you to vote and easier for him to cheat. Now we know what that will look like in 2026.

Donald Trump issued an executive order claiming powers over federal elections that he does not have. In response, the U.S. Postal Service is trying to ram through a rule that will make voting by mail more difficult while requiring states to turn over sensitive voter data.

The Postal Service has not been shy in making clear that it is taking these steps to allow federal law enforcement to conduct criminal investigations of alleged voter fraud.

That is not all the USPS has done to make voting more difficult. A series of smaller changes have resulted in slower mail service and delayed postmarks on envelopes. While these are not limited to returned ballots, the results have been devastating for those trying to vote by mail.

Meanwhile, the Department of Justice continues to sue for access to states’ complete voter files, while the head of its Civil Rights Division is threatening to deploy 1,000 federal agents to “monitor” polling places in the midterm elections.

The Department of Homeland Security is readying so-called state citizenship lists to send to states, a thinly veiled threat to state officials to purge voters… or else. And things are escalating quickly. Now word has come that the DHS will launch a massive witch hunt to investigate evidence of nonexistent, widespread voter fraud.

The weaponization of government against Trump’s political enemies is in full swing and out in the open. Under Trump’s direction, the DOJ will now target state election officials under the guise that they have permitted illegal voting.

Republicans and their allies are litigating to make voting more difficult and election subversion easier. Recently, the Republican National Committee joined the Trump administration in asking the Supreme Court to gut a federal law that limits last-minute voter purges. 

Election offices, which in the past served to protect the integrity of elections from attacks by bad actors, are now being overrun and infiltrated by election deniers trying to sow doubt from the inside.

Individually, each of these developments is troubling. Collectively, they paint a damning picture of an authoritarian president trying to rig the vote before it happens. This government-sponsored voter suppression is on a scale we have not seen in our nation’s history.

While nearly all of what I describe above is undisputed fact, it has been normalized by a legacy media intent on not taking sides. That must end now.

In the past, some have called me an alarmist. Critics have accused me of being too aggressive in fighting back. They suggest I find more room for compromise and seek bipartisan solutions.

There is no virtue in turning a blind eye to voter suppression to meet Republicans halfway. There is no vice in remaining firm against election subversion, even if it requires standing alone.

It is not spreading conspiracy theories to draw the obvious connections between the individual efforts of this administration and their GOP allies to obstruct free and fair elections.

Donald Trump is the unquestioned originator and leader of the election denier movement. But he is not its only adherent.

The plan to subvert the midterm elections may have originated in the White House,  but it is being carried out by dozens of federal agencies, outside groups, and Republican officials.

Defeating it in the short time remaining will require a similarly focused effort by the pro-democracy community. That means recognizing the strengths that we all bring to this fight.

As Election Day nears, Democratic candidates and parties will necessarily step to the forefront in the courtrooms. As I often point out, it is no coincidence that the 2000 election was decided in a case captioned Bush v. Gore. Nor was it by chance that I represented Joe Biden and the Democratic Party in more than 60 cases in the 2020 post-election litigation.

The role of candidates in litigation has become more important. The Supreme Court recently granted them unique standing to challenge nearly all election rules and laws. According to the Chief Justice John Roberts, unlike other potential parties to litigation, “candidates suffer when the process departs from the law.”

That does not mean there is not an important role for other pro-democracy organizations to play in the courtroom and out. On the contrary, providing nonpartisan information to voters, organizing direct action and supporting election officials who do the right thing are vital to our system of elections.

The most important work, however, belongs to the citizens of this country. Each of us must make sure we understand the rules for registering to vote and casting a ballot. We must share that information with those in our circles of trust.

We must also call out the efforts to suppress the vote for what they are — an assault on democracy. We must insist that our election officials, regardless of party, stand up against those barriers. And, after the ballots are cast, we must remain engaged until the accurate results are certified and the rightful winners take their seats.

The next few months will be long and hard. But democracy is worth the fight.




03 September 2026

The ACLU's most ambitious election protection program EVER & Judge Once Again Bars Postal Service From Restricting Mail-In Vote & Texas Has Suspended More Than 1 Million Voters Ahead of Senate Race 1SEP&27AUG26

VERIFY YOUR VOTER REGISTRATION STATUS AT ROCK THE VOTE

TEXAS RESIDENTS CAN USE ROCK THE VOTE TO CHECK THEIR VOTER REGISTRATION AND REGISTER TO VOTE OR THEY CAN DO THE SAME AT THE TEXAS SECRETARY OF STATE'S WEBSITE.

THE neo-nazi fascist authoritarian drumpf/trump-vance reich, with their ass licking cabinet and gop / greed over people-republican party are trying every anti democracy trick to destroy our democratic Republic and impose their authoritarian theocratic oligarchy. Make sure to register to vote and or check your voter registration at Rock The Vote and then remember to vote, early if allowed in your state, or on Tuesday, 3 November 2026. If you vote by mail be sure you fill in all the mandatory information correctly on your ballot and mail it before election day if possible. These from the ACLU, the New York Times and The New Republic.....

Judge Once Again Bars Postal Service From Restricting Mail-In Vote


After reviewing the agency’s final plan to comply with President Trump’s demands, a federal judge barred the Postal Service from imposing new restrictions on mail-in voting.


A federal judge on Thursday once again temporarily prohibited the U.S. Postal Service from carrying out a plan to restrict mail-in voting, put in place after a directive from President Trump.

Judge Indira Talwani, a Federal District Court judge in Massachusetts, had cleared the way for the Postal Service to move forward just the day before. But on Thursday, she issued a new order concluding that the agency’s plan, released late on Friday, appeared to overstep its legal mandate and could spark chaos by changing rules fewer than 70 days before an election.

She wrote that a group of Democratic-led states that had sued “face irreparable harm where they are required to comply with a likely unconstitutional regulation for which compliance is practically impossible as to the 2026 midterm elections, now little more than two months away.”

“Most plaintiff states have already ordered their mail ballots, and some are required by state law to send them to eligible voters as early as next week,” she added.

She wrote that while the Supreme Court had “admonished” her on Monday that the Postal Service had not finalized any changes when the groups sued initially, making court action premature, the stakes had changed since then because of the step the agency took Friday to formalize its plan.

Her ruling marked the third court decision on the issue in less than a week, a whipsaw of action that threatened to confuse voters. But each delay has reduced the administration’s chances of clearing the legal hurdles to execute its logistically complicated mail-in ballot plan before the November election. She blocked the rule from taking effect for 14 days, and she had previously scheduled a hearing to discuss the legality of the rule on Sept. 3.

In her order, Judge Talwani explained that the prospect of the new rule suddenly taking effect carried “significant risk of their members’ disenfranchisement” for voting rights organizations, which had also sued, along with the states.

She ticked through a list of requirements that state election officials would be required to meet to ensure delivery of ballots, including receiving the agency’s approval for new envelope designs and submitting voters’ information into an online portal run by the Postal Service.

“Where a state or local election official does not obtain envelope and return envelope design approval, or does not upload voter information, or does not include unique intelligent mail bar codes on ballot envelopes, the U.S.P.S. will not mail ballots to voters,” she concluded.

The nonprofit groups behind one of the lawsuits said in a joint statement that they welcomed the court’s order. “This is an important step towards affirming the public’s confidence in the system of mail ballots, which thousands of eligible voters nationwide rely on as a core method of democratic participation,” the groups said in the statement.

In March, President Trump issued an executive order that required the Department of Homeland Security to create and circulate state-by-state citizenship lists to state officials. It further urged states to provide the U.S. Postal Service with their own lists of voters eligible to cast ballots by mail.

Multiple lawsuits were filed challenging the order, arguing that Congress and the states set rules for elections, not the executive branch. The challengers also argued that no federal law gives the Postal Service the power to make those kinds of election-related rules.

On Monday, the Supreme Court ruled that one suit, brought by a group of Democratic-led states, was premature because the administration had not started implementing its plans.

But late Friday, just before the court ruled, the Postal Service formally published a new plan to comply with the executive order. Under that plan, the service would not deliver mail ballots in states that do not share voter data with the agency and would only deliver ballots that meet certain criteria.


Lawyers for the Trump administration and the groups challenging the rule continue to clash over a straightforward issue: Whether or not the Postal Service’s plan would mean the agency would be taking on a new role verifying voters and potentially rejecting ballots in the midterm election in November.

In a filing on Thursday, the Postal Service denied that its proposal left room for the service to second-guess states on which voters were eligible to cast a ballot.

“U.S.P.S. will not scrutinize those decisions or alter that information in any way — instead leaving it entirely up to the states to accurately and lawfully identify its residents who are eligible to vote by mail,” the filing said. “The Postal Service will not determine voter eligibility, ballot content, mailing or receipt deadlines, or ballot-counting procedures.”

Instead, it described the changes as minor logistical improvements and streamlining, such as requiring voters to submit their addresses ahead of time to improve processing. It said the changes were designed “as a matter of the Postal Service’s own judgment.” Lawyers for the service argued it is authorized to adopt mail rules under statutes adopted by Congress.

A spokesman for the Postal Service did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The challengers argue that the Postal Service rule is an unconstitutional violation of the separation of powers, allowing the executive branch to intrude into elections. They say that no federal law permits such action by the agency, and they assert that the Trump administration’s actions are likely to sow confusion among voters and to lead to disenfranchisement.

The agency has said that it would not try to impose the new requirements for the 2026 elections, unless explicitly allowed to by the courts.

A series of lawsuits in Massachusetts and the District of Columbia by different groups have challenged Mr. Trump’s effort to discredit and erect obstacles to mail-in voting. The lawsuits have challenged both Mr. Trump’s executive order and the Postal Service rule, focusing on their implementation this year and beyond.

Adam Sella contributed reporting.

Zach Montague is a Times reporter covering the federal courts, including the legal disputes over the Trump administration’s agenda.