NORTON META TAG

Showing posts with label tpp. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tpp. Show all posts

22 November 2016

DEMOCRACY NOW! DAILY DIGEST "Heil Victory!" Alt-Right Groups Emboldened by Trump's Election & Chief Strategist Steve Bannon 22NOV16


Democracy Now! Daily Digest

A Daily Independent Global News Hour with Amy Goodman & Juan González

Tuesday, November 22, 2016

Stories


A video leaked Monday from a self-proclaimed "alt-right" conference that took place over the weekend in Washington, D.C., shows hundreds gathering to, ... Read More →

There is growing resistance to Trump’s vow to detain and deport millions of people from the United States. Mayors from New York to Chicago to Seattle say they ... Read More →

A sweeping new report reveals ties to slavery and the displacement of the Native Americans at one of the country’s top colleges. The findings about 250-year-old ... Read More →

Headlines →

23 September 2016

OUR REVOLUTION Why Are There Any Liberals Supporting Gary Johnson? & Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren make the pitch to millennials for Clinton 17&18SEP16

Our Revolution
IT blows my mind that people who supported +Senator Bernie Sanders I VT have turned to and plan on voting for libertarian gary johnson. Green party candidate Dr Jill Stein is more in line with Bernie's presidential platform for those who feel they MUST cast a protest vote. BUT disappointed Bernie supporter's who are supporting and planning to vote for gary johnson are totally rejecting and working to defeat everything the Sander's campaign fought for. I supported and voted for Bernie Sanders. I am now supporting and will vote for Hillary Clinton because we got a lot of Bernie's policies included in the Democratic Party's presidential platform and Hillary is actively supporting and is committed to these positions. Check out this expose from +Mother Jones and then Hillary Clinton's campaign website and then really think about your vote and who best deserves your support and vote on 8 NOV 16. Click here to join Our Revolution.

Why Are There Any Liberals Supporting Gary Johnson?

SEP. 17, 2016 8:08 PM
According to the latest New York Times poll, Gary Johnson is supported by 26 percent of young voters.1 Of these Johnson supporters, how many are liberal former supporters of Bernie Sanders who would normally be expected to switch to Hillary Clinton? No one seems to have explicitly polled about this, but various pieces of evidence suggest that it's around half. If you make some reasonable assumptions and do a bit of arithmetic, this suggests that somewhere around a fifth of young liberal voters are casting their lot with Johnson.
In one sense, this is easy to understand. Johnson favors legalization of marijuana. He's good on civil liberties and wants to cut way back on overseas military interventions. He's moderate on immigration. He's pro-choice and supports gay rights. There are plenty of things for Bernie supporters to like about him.
On the other hand, Johnson is a libertarian. Here's a smattering of what else he believes:
  • He supports TPP.
  • He supports fracking.
  • He opposes any federal policies that would make college more affordable or reduce student debt. In fact, he wants to abolish student loans entirely.
  • He thinks Citizens United is great.
  • He doesn't want to raise the minimum wage. At all.
  • He favors a balanced-budget amendment and has previously suggested that he would slash federal spending 43 percent in order to balance the budget. This would require massive cuts to Social Security, Medicare, and social welfare programs of all kinds.
  • He opposes net neutrality.
  • He wants to increase the Social Security retirement age to 75 and he's open to privatization.
  • He opposes any kind of national health care and wants to repeal Obamacare.
  • He opposes practically all forms of gun control.
  • He opposes any kind of paid maternity or medical leave.
  • He supported the Keystone XL pipeline.
  • He opposes any government action to address climate change.
  • He wants to cut the corporate tax rate to zero.
  • He appears to believe that we should reduce financial regulation. All we need to do is allow big banks to fail and everything will be OK.
  • He wants to remove the Fed's mandate to maximize employment and has spoken favorably of returning to the gold standard.
  • He wants to block-grant Medicare and turn it over to the states.
  • He wants to repeal the 16th Amendment and eliminate the income tax, the payroll tax, and the estate tax. He would replace it with a 28 percent FairTax that exempts the poor. This is equivalent to a 39 percent sales tax, and it would almost certainly represent a large tax cut for the rich.
Some of her weirder beliefs aside, it's easy to see why former Bernie supporters might turn to Jill Stein. But Gary Johnson? He makes Hillary Clinton look like the second coming of FDR. Unless you're basically a single-issue voter on civil liberties and military force, it's hard to see why any lefty of any stripe would even think of supporting Johnson. What's the deal here?
1Oddly enough, the story that originally reported this has been silently purged of this statistic, but let's go with it anyway.
KEVIN DRUM
Kevin is a political blogger for Mother Jones. Email Kevin calpundit@cox.net. For more of his stories, click here or follow him on Facebook.

Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren make the pitch to millennials for Clinton

By JACQUELINE ALEMANY CBS NEWS September 18, 2016, 7:15 PM
Hillary Clinton dispatched two progressive icons to Ohio this weekend to reverse course with millennials — an increasingly substantial voting bloc that has drifted away from the Democratic nominee. 
Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders and Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren campaigned on college campuses throughout the state after several polls this week indicated that Clinton’s lead with young voters had nearly evaporated. In Ohio, according to a Suffolk University poll released this week, Trump is even leading Clinton by 11 points, 43 percent to 31 percent, among 18 to 34 year-olds. 
Sanders, the overwhelming favorite of young voters​ in Ohio’s March primary, attacked Trump’s campaign for “bigotry” before touting Clinton’s plan to take on student debt and repeated rallying cries to get out the vote on Saturday. 
“Eighty-three percent of American families should be able to send their kids to public college and universities tuition free​,” Sanders said to an auditorium filled with students at the University of Akron. “So when you go out and talk to your friends and they say, ‘Oh God I’m not going to vote it’s a waste of time everybody is terrible,’ ask them how much they’re going to leave school in debt with. Ask them about that.”
Warren, meanwhile, electrified a Cleveland crowd with what was perhaps her most forceful and urgent condemnation of Trump to date on Sunday morning. 
“Trump has more support from Aryan nation and the Ku Klux Klan than he does the leadership of the Republican Party,” Warren said during an appearance at Cleveland State University. “For years, Trump has led the charge on the birther movement, and only when his handlers tied him down and made him, did he finally admit that it wasn’t true. What kind of a man that does that? A man with a dark and ugly soul, a man who will never be president.” 
The Massachusetts Senator also played the part of cheerleader, pumping her fists as she sang praises of Ohio Senate candidate Ted Strickland, who is lagging in the polls behind incumbent Sen. Rob Portman​. Warren shouted “I’m with Hillary,” before urging the group of students, parents and grandparents to register to vote and volunteer for the campaign. 
The frenzied crowd reveled in Warren’s flogging of the Republican party. Even actor John Lithgow, the Clinton celebrity surrogate who introduced Warren and Strickland, wanted a selfie with the Massachusetts Senator on the rope line. 
Still, support for Clinton’s progressive surrogates in the room doesn’t appear to have translated to real enthusiasm for the Democratic nominee just yet. 
“I was an avid Bernie supporter and now I’m undecided,” Ryan Wile, a 20 year-old student from Akron, told CBS News. “I mean, I’m anti-Trump but I don’t know if I’ll vote for her. She flip-flops a lot. I’m leaning her direction but I don’t know.”
Tommy Watral, a 19 year-old student at Kent State University from Mentor, Ohio who served as a delegate for Sanders to the Democratic Convention, flatly stated that he was voting for Clinton because she was the nominee and the alternative to Trump. “That’s just how it is,” he said. 
“She’s struggling especially with the youth vote because we have so much access to information so we can look up her voting records and what she has done as First Lady and Secretary of State,” Watral explained of the lackluster enthusiasm. 
Sarah Melissa Miller, a 31-year-old voter from Canton, Ohio, was critical of Clinton’s style, saying “when she first starts talking her voice sounds flat.” 
“But when you actually listen to her, and how she feels about the issues, you realize she is actually working more for younger people than the other candidates,” Miller said. 
Nevertheless, the outreach was welcomed by members of the generation that Obama won by 29 percentage points over Mitt Romney in 2012. 
“The fact that Sanders is actually endorsing her is really important because I wasn’t really the biggest fan of hers but now that I see that he is going out of his way to promote who she is, I think it’s super important,” said Zach Fradette, a 21-year-old student from Westerville, Ohio. 
Brooke Babyak, a 27 year-old Clinton supporter from Akron, Ohio, who was in attendance at Warren’s event in Cleveland on Sunday said Warren’s brand as a champion for young people and infectious enthusiasm would certainly benefit Clinton. 
“Warren has a lot of ideas for changing how college is paid for and addressed the issues that younger voters are for,” Babyak said. “Hillary has these same ideas and if they can combine that with the enthusiasm, it’ll help.” 
Watral even offered some unsolicited advice for the Clinton campaign with regards to Sanders’ role in the campaign. 
“I think he should really just do a college tour until voting day to get college students voting enthusiasm up because now it’s just faltering,” he said. 
According to the Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Florida and Virginia would have flipped from blue to red without the youth vote in 2012. 
Fortunately for Clinton, she has amassed a bench of powerful surrogates who have vowed do whatever it takes to get the former Secretary of State elected. 
Clinton’s most popular resource, First Lady Michelle Obama, campaigned with Tim Kaine at George Mason University in Virginia on Friday. There, to chants of “four more years,” she made an explicit appeal for Clinton.  
“Let’s be clear, elections aren’t just about who votes, but who doesn’t vote. And that is especially true for young people like all of you,” Obama said. “Without those votes, Barack would have lost those states and he definitely would have lost that election. Period, end of story.” 
Supporters and critics alike have suggested that Clinton’s message has been overshadowed by her near constant attacks on Trump. “Millennial voters want to talk about the issues. That’s what will get them to the polls. They aren’t scared of Donald Trump,” Symone Sanders, the Vermont Senator’s former National Press Secretary, tweeted on Saturday. 
Clinton is scheduled to give a speech aimed at millennial voters at Temple University in Philadelphia on Monday where she’ll lay out her plans to make debt free college and community college available to students. 



14 March 2016

Clinton & Sanders Spar on Immigration Reform, Deportations & U.S. Imperialism in Latin America & Full CNN Democratic Town Hall Ohio Bernie Sanders 3/13/2016 10MAR16


FOLLOWING +Senator Bernie Sanders win of the 2016 Michigan Democratic primary he has debated hillary clinton in Florida and appeared in the same town hall meeting as her in Ohio. Just as the students and workers and poor and middle class, just as the people of Michigan started to actually pay attention to what the Democratic candidates, not the party leadership, were saying and voted for Bernie 2016 , the same kind of shift is taking place in Ohio, Illinois, Missouri, Florida and N Carolina. Bold Progressive policies that benefit all Americans sound impressive, Bernie's commitment to fight for these policies, to make them reality, is motivating people to vote. Voters in the states holding Democratic primaries tomorrow, Tuesday, 15 MAR 16 owe it to themselves to go to Bernie 2016 to check out his positions on the issues before voting. This from +Democracy Now! (click watch full show for the video) and +CNN .....

Clinton & Sanders Spar on Immigration Reform, Deportations & U.S. Imperialism in Latin America

MARCH 10, 2016
STORY
WATCH FULL SHOW

In the 2016 race for the White House, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders squared off in a debate at Miami-Dade College in Florida sponsored by the Spanish-language network Univision. The two candidates clashed on issues including immigration, trade policy, Latin America and more. Both candidates vowed not to deport children, while Clinton attacked Sanders for opposing a 2007 immigration bill. Sanders also spoke out against U.S. military intervention in Latin America after being shown a 1985 clip of him praising Fidel Castro. "What that was about was saying that the United States was wrong to try to invade Cuba, that the United States was wrong trying to support people to overthrow the Nicaraguan government, that the United States was wrong trying to overthrow in 1954 the democratically elected government of Guatemala," Sanders said. The debate comes one day after Sanders’ surprise victory in the Michigan primary.

TRANSCRIPT

This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.
NERMEEN SHAIKH: With less than a week before voters head to the polls in Florida, Illinois, Missouri and North Carolina, Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders sparred last night in a debate in Miami hosted by Univision. Large portions of the debate focused on immigration. Facing questioning by moderator Jorge Ramos, both candidates promised not to deport children or noncriminal undocumented immigrants.
JORGE RAMOS: But again, yes or no, can you promise tonight that you won’t deport children, children who are already here?
HILLARY CLINTON: I will not deport children. I would not deport children. I do not want to deport family members, either, Jorge. I want to, as I said, prioritize who would be deported: violent criminals, people planning terrorist attacks, anybody who threatens us. That’s a relatively small universe.
JORGE RAMOS: OK, so I want to be very specific. So, you’re telling us tonight that if you become president, you won’t deport children who are already here?
HILLARY CLINTON: I will not.
JORGE RAMOS: And that you won’t deport immigrants who don’t have a criminal record.
HILLARY CLINTON: That’s what—that’s what I’m telling you.
JORGE RAMOS: Senator, Senator Sanders, will you—can you promise us tonight that you won’t deport children?
SENBERNIE SANDERS: Now, I happen to agree with President Obama on many, many issues. I think he’s done a great job as president of the United States. He is wrong on this issue of deportation. I disagree with him on that. So, to answer your question, no, I will not deport children from the United States of America.
JORGE RAMOS: And can you promise not to deport immigrants who don’t have a criminal record?
SENBERNIE SANDERS: I can make that promise.
AMY GOODMAN: Hillary Clinton repeatedly criticized Bernie Sanders for voting against a 2007 immigration reform bill.
HILLARY CLINTON: I think our best chance was in 2007, when Ted Kennedy led the charge on comprehensive immigration reform. We had Republican support. We had a president willing to sign it. I voted for that bill. Senator Sanders voted against it.
MARÍA ELENA SALINAS: Now, Senator Sanders, in 2007, you voted against immigration reform. You now say that it was because the bill had guest worker provisions which seemed semi-slavery. But back then, this is what you said to CNN’s Lou Dobbs. Let’s listen.
SENBERNIE SANDERS: If poverty is increasing and if wages are going down, I don’t know why we need millions of people to be coming into this country as guest workers who will work for lower wages than American workers and drive wages down even lower than they are right now.
MARÍA ELENA SALINAS: So, Senator, were you concerned with working conditions for guest workers, or really because you think immigrants drive down wages and take jobs from Americans?
SENBERNIE SANDERS: Well, you have guest worker programs that have been described by the Southern Poverty Law Center, one of the important institutions in this country who studies these issues, as guest worker programs akin to slavery, where people came in, they were cheated, they were abused, they were humiliated, and if they stood up for their rights, they would be thrown out of the country. Of course that type of effort leads to a race to the bottom for all of our people.
HILLARY CLINTON: You know, I think it’s very hard to make the case that Ted Kennedy, Barack Obama, me, La Raza, United Farm Workers, Dolores Huerta, leaders of the Latino community, would have supported a bill that actually promoted modern slavery. That was one of the many excuses used not to vote for the 2007 bill.
NERMEEN SHAIKH: While Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders took jabs at Donald Trump, Clinton was questioned about her voting record to expand security along the Mexican border.
MARÍA ELENA SALINAS: But the question is: What is the difference between the wall that you voted for and Donald Trump’s wall?
HILLARY CLINTON: It’s a big difference. I mean, first of all, as I understand him, he’s talking about a very tall wall—right?—a beautiful, tall wall, the most beautiful, tall wall, better than the Great Wall of China, that would run the entire border, that he would somehow magically get the Mexican government to pay for. And, you know, it’s just fantasy. And, in fact, if he cared to know anything about what members of Congress, like the senator and I, have done, where it was necessary, we did support some fencing. Where it was necessary, we did add Border Patrol agents. We have done what by any fair estimate would have to conclude is a good job, quote, "securing the border." So let’s get about the business of comprehensive immigration reform.
SENBERNIE SANDERS: Let me just say—
MARÍA ELENA SALINAS: Senator?
SENBERNIE SANDERS: The secretary and I mostly, I think, agree on this issue. Look, in this country, immigration reform is a very hot debate. It’s divided the country. But I would hope very much that as we have that debate, we do not, as Donald Trump and others have done, resort to racism and xenophobia and bigotry. This idea of suddenly, one day or maybe a night, rounding up 11 million people and taking them outside of this country is a vulgar, absurd idea that I would hope very few people in America support.
AMY GOODMAN: The candidates also discussed the Puerto Rican debt crisis.
HILLARY CLINTON: The Congress must give authority to Puerto Rico to restructure its debts, just like it has—it has enabled states and cities to restructure their debt. And it is a grave injustice for the Congress, led by the Republicans, to be refusing to enact that opportunity within the bankruptcy law.
And what we see in Puerto Rico now is a lot of suffering. We see, you know, schools being closed. We see healthcare being denied. And we see a thousand Puerto Rican families a month moving to the United States, mostly to Florida. Puerto Ricans are citizens of America. They deserve to be treated as citizens and to be given the opportunity to get back on their feet economically.
SENBERNIE SANDERS: When you get to Puerto Rico, there’s an issue that we have not talked about. That little island is $73 billion in debt, and the government now is paying interest rates of up to 11 percent. And many of the bonds that they are paying off were purchased by vulture capitalists for 30 cents on the dollar. And what I have said in talking to the leaders of Puerto Rico, we’ve got to bring people together. And it’s not the people of Puerto Rico or the children—
KAREN TUMULTY: Senator—OK.
SENBERNIE SANDERS: —or the schools, but maybe some of these vulture capitalists who are going to have to lose a little bit of money in this process.
NERMEEN SHAIKH: During the debate, Univision questioned Bernie Sanders about comments he made during the 1980s about Cuba and Nicaragua.
MARÍA ELENA SALINAS: In 1985, you praised the Sandinista government, and you said that Daniel Ortega was an impressive guy. This is what you said about Fidel Castro. Let’s listen.
MAYOR BERNIE SANDERS: You may recall way back in—when was it?—1961, they invaded Cuba. And everybody was totally convinced that Castro was the worst guy in the world, all the Cuban people were going to rise up in rebellion against Fidel Castro. They forgot that he educated their kids, gave them healthcare, totally transformed the society.
MARÍA ELENA SALINAS: In South Florida, there are still open wounds among some exiles regarding socialism and communism. So please explain what is the difference between the socialism—
SENBERNIE SANDERS: Well—
MARÍA ELENA SALINAS: —that you profess and the socialism in Nicaragua, Cuba and Venezuela.
SENBERNIE SANDERS: Well, let me just answer that. What that was about was saying that the United States was wrong to try to invade Cuba, that the United States was wrong trying to support people to overthrow the Nicaraguan government, that the United States was wrong trying to overthrow in 1954 the government—democratically elected government of Guatemala. Throughout the history of our relationship with Latin America, we’ve operated under the so-called Monroe Doctrine. And that said that the United States had the right do anything that they wanted to do in Latin America.
So I actually went to Nicaragua, and I very strongly opposed the Reagan administration’s effort to overthrow that government. And I strongly opposed earlier Henry Kissinger and the—to overthrow the government of Salvador Allende in Chile. I think the United States should be working with governments around the world, not get involved in regime change. And all of these actions, by the way, in Latin America brought forth a lot of very strong anti-American sentiments. That’s what that was about.
HILLARY CLINTON: And I just want to add one thing to the question you were asking Senator Sanders. I think in that same interview he praised what he called the revolution of values in Cuba and talked about how people were working for the common good, not for themselves. I just couldn’t disagree more. You know, if the values are that you oppress people, you disappear people, you imprison people, even kill people, for expressing their opinions, for expressing freedom of speech, that is not the kind of revolution of values that I ever want to see anywhere.
NERMEEN SHAIKH: At the Univision debate, Hillary Clinton was also questioned about her use of a private email server while she was secretary of state.
JORGE RAMOS: So, who specifically gave you permission to operate your email system as you did? Was it President Barack Obama? And would you drop out of the race if you get indicted?
HILLARY CLINTON: Well, Jorge, there’s a lot of questions in there. And I’m going to give the same answer I’ve been giving for many months. It wasn’t the best choice. I made a mistake. It was not prohibited. It was not in any way disallowed. And as I’ve said and as now has come out, my predecessors did the same thing, and many other people in the government.
JORGE RAMOS: The questions were: Who gave you permission to operate?
HILLARY CLINTON: There—there—
JORGE RAMOS: Was it President Obama?
HILLARY CLINTON: There was no permission to be asked. It had been done by my predecessors. It was permitted. I didn’t have to ask anyone.
JORGE RAMOS: If you get indicted, would you drop out?
HILLARY CLINTON: Oh, for goodness—that is not going to happen. I’m not even answering that question.
AMY GOODMAN: Highlights from last night’s Univision debate in Miami, Florida. It was the last Democratic debate before voters go to the polls in Florida, Illinois, Missouri, North Carolina and Ohio. 


05 February 2016

The 7 Must-Watch Moments From the Democrats' New Hampshire Debate 4FEB16

LAST nights Democratic primary debate was interesting. After her squeaker of a win in the Iowa Democratic caucus last Tuesday, hillary now realizes she is facing a serious challenge from +Senator Bernie Sanders' presidential campaign. She continues to tout her experience and states she knows how to get things done. Maybe so, but for who? If she is a true Progressive she wouldn't have stayed in the Obama administration as long as she did, and she would have publicly challenged the administration, her fellow cabinet secretaries and her fellow Democrats in Congress on too big to fail, too big to jail, keystone xl, chained CPI, tpp, stagnant wages, the social safety net, the war on women and voting rights, just to name a few things. Her third way democrat positions give too much away to corporate America, to the rich, the 1% with too little left for the poor, the working and middle class Americans that are still struggling to survive, to make ends meet. If hillary ever finds the courage to turn her back on the demands being made of her by the millionaires, billionaires and corporate America, and so loose their financial support, then she will be able to call herself a Progressive and will find the freedom to work for and represent all Americans. This, including the full video of the debate, from +Mother Jones and +MSNBC ....

The 7 Must-Watch Moments From the Democrats' New Hampshire Debate

The two remaining candidates did not hold back in Thursday night's testy debate.

| Thu Feb. 4, 2016 11:54 PM EST
Explosive would be an understatement. Sen. Bernie Sanders and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton didn’t waste any time in Thursday's Democratic presidential debate in New Hampshire before jumping into a heated exchange over whether Clinton is a true progressive—a subject that continued to emerge in various forms for most of an hour.
The stakes going into this debate were high, particularly for Clinton, with polls showing her far behind Sanders in the New Hampshire just four days before the first-in-the-nation primary. Clinton eked out a very narrow win in the Iowa caucuses on Monday but underperformed her polling there, setting up what could be a long slog for the Democratic nomination.
The debate itself was the product of a dramatic back-and-forth between the two campaigns and the national Democratic Party over the number of debates scheduled. The tensions that went into scheduling it were evident in the fiery debate.
Here are the must-watch highlights:

Clinton rips Sanders' definition of "progressive." Clinton challenged the idea that she is not progressive enough to be the Democratic Party's nominee by ripping apart Sander's use of the term, claiming that under his definition many mainstay liberal politicians would be excluded. "Under his definition, President Obama is not progressive because he took donations from Wall Street; Vice President Biden is not progressive because he supported Keystone; Sen. [Jeanne] Shaheen [of New Hampshire] is not progressive because she supports the trade pact," Clinton said. "Even the late, great Sen. Paul Wellstone would not fit this definition because he voted for [the Defense of Marriage Act]. You know, we have differences and, honestly, I think we should be talk about what we want to do for the country. But if we're going to get into labels, I don't think it was particularly progressive to vote against the Brady Bill five times."
After Clinton's challenge, the debate moderators wondered: Does Sanders dispute the idea that Barack Obama should be termed a progressive? "Do I think President Obama's a progressive? Yeah, I do," Sanders said after a long windup, though still noting that he disagreed with the president on a number of issues.
Sanders wants to change the Democratic Party. Asked about how he would lead the Democratic Party given his long career as an independent, Sanders declared that he wanted to make big changes to the party. "I am running for president as a Democrat," he said. "And if elected, not only do I hope to bring forth a major change in national priorities, but let me be frank, I do want to see major changes in the Democratic Party. I want to see working people and young people come into the party in a way that doesn't exist now. And you know what, I want a 50-state strategy so the Democratic Party is not just the party of 25 states."
Clinton fights the "establishment" label. MSNBC's Rachel Maddow quizzed Sanders about Clinton's big advantage in endorsements from fellow Democratic politicians from Vermont. "Secretary Clinton does represent the establishment," Sanders responded. "I represent, I hope, ordinary Americans, and by the way, who are not all that enamored with the establishment."
Clinton was ready to dismiss that dig, however, noting that her candidacy is far from the norm. "Honestly, Sen. Sanders is the only person who I think would characterize me, a woman running to be the first woman president, as exemplifying the establishment. And I've got to tell you that it is really quite amusing to me."
Sanders explains his problem with Clinton's campaign funds from Wall Street. Sanders emphasized that Clinton and the super-PAC supporting her candidacy are taking donations from the financial sector—and argued that it is this kind of political donation that helps big industries like Wall Street avoid tough regulations.
"What being part of the establishment is, is, in the last quarter, having a super-PAC that raised $15 million from Wall Street, that throughout one's life raised a whole lot of money from the drug companies and other special interests," Sanders said. "To my mind, if we do not get a handle on money in politics and the degree to which big money controls the political process in this country, nobody is going to bring about the changes that is needed in this country for the middle class and working families."
Clinton goes after Sanders' "artful smears." Sanders' favorite refrain on the campaign trail has been that he wants to talk about issues rather than the nasty personal attacks that normally define political campaigns. Those claims of purity aren't ringing true to Clinton, who termed his attacks against her "an artful smear" that cut against his earlier pledges. "But time and time again," Clinton said, "by innuendo, by insinuation, there is this attack that he is putting forth, which really comes down to—you know, anybody who ever took donations or speaking fees from any interest group has to be bought. And I just absolutely reject that, Senator. And I really don't think these kinds of attacks by insinuation are worthy of you. And enough is enough. If you've got something to say, say it directly."
Emails are…still not an issue in the Democratic primary. (Sorry, moderators.) Moderator Chuck Todd asked Clinton whether she can assure Democrats that the controversy over her emails will not "blow up her candidacy" if she wins the nomination. Clinton's response was unequivocal.
"Absolutely I can," she said. "You know, before it was emails, it was Benghazi, and the Republicans were stirring up so much controversy about that. And I testified for 11 hours, answered their questions. They basically said yeah, didn't get her. We tried. That was all a political ploy."
Todd tried again. "Are you 100 percent confident that nothing is going to come of this FBI investigation?" he asked.
"I am 100 percent confident," Clinton responded.
Clinton defends the death penalty. The moderators challenged Clinton on one area where she's not quite in step with the Democratic primary electorate: capital punishment. When asked about whether she still supports the use of the death penalty, Clinton said she's skeptical of how it's employed at the state level but thinks it's an important tool at the federal level, highlighting Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh as an example where capital punishment was warranted. "I do, for very limited, particularly heinous crimes, believe it is an appropriate punishment, but I deeply disagree with the way that too many states are still implementing it," Clinton said. "If it were possible to separate the federal from the state system by the Supreme Court, that would, I think, be an appropriate outcome."
Sanders, in turn, said he opposed the death penalty in all cases. "Number one," Sanders explained, "too many innocent people, including minorities, African Americans, have been executed when they were not guilty." But even beyond the racial implications, Sanders said he objected to capital punishment entirely. "In a world of so much violence and killing, I just don't believe that government itself should be part of the killing."