BUCKNACKT'S SORDID TAWDRY BLOG
We should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive & well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, chocolate, bier or wein in hand, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "WHOO-HOO, WHAT A RIDE!!!!!!"
NORTON META TAG
Showing posts with label debt-free college. Show all posts
Showing posts with label debt-free college. Show all posts
IF the drumpf/trump-pence administration has the money to increase the Pentagon budget for war we should be able to pass this legislation to provide a debt free college education for children of families making less than $125,000.00 AND GET THIS, it is paid for by a tax on wall street speculators, NOT by cutting funding for discretionary programs. The increase in the defense budget would be paid for by funding cuts for education, health care, social safety net programs and agencies like the EPA and National Park Service. Please sign this petition calling on congress to pass The College For All Act introduced by Sen Bernie Sanders I VT / Our Revolution ....
Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT), along with Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA), Rep Keith Ellison (D-MN) and Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), promoted the College For All Act this week. More and more Democrats are signing on, with Senators Richard Blumenthal and Chris Murphy becoming the latest to co-sponsor the bill. The bill would use a tax on Wall Street speculation.
The bill also would cut the interest rates for new loans and enable existing borrowers to refinance at the new lower rate.
The Senators said the $600 billion cost would be paid for by a separate bill to tax Wall Street speculation. That tax is proposed to be 0.5 percent on stock trades, a 0.1 percent fee on bonds and a 0.005 percent fee on derivatives, they said the tax would raise at least $600 billion over the next decade.
Free college for all is not a pipe dream, it’s a realistic and essential cultural shift our country needs. Of course, you can always just send your children to Germany where they’ve already done the right thing. Sen. Sanders has introduced a college for all act a few times over the years and Democrats are hopefully beginning to realize that a little bit of socialism can go a long way.
In a highly competitive global economy, we need the best-educated workforce in the world. It is insane and counter-productive to the best interests of our country and our future, that hundreds of thousands of bright young people cannot afford to go to college, and that millions of others leave school with a mountain of debt that burdens them for decades. That shortsighted path to the future must end.
Bernie Sanders will fight to make sure that every American who studies hard in school can go to college regardless of how much money their parents make and without going deeply into debt.
HERE ARE THE SIX STEPS THAT BERNIE WILL TAKE TO MAKE COLLEGE DEBT FREE:
MAKE TUITION FREE AT PUBLIC COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES.
This is not a radical idea. Germany eliminated tuition because they believed that charging students $1,300 per year was discouraging Germans from going to college. Chile will do the same. Finland, Norway, Sweden and many other countries around the world also offer free college to all of their citizens. If other countries can take this action, so can the United States of America.
In fact, it’s what many of our colleges and universities used to do. The University of California system offered free tuition at its schools until the 1980s. In 1965, average tuition at a four-year public university was just $243 and many of the best colleges – including the City University of New York – did not charge any tuition at all. The Sanders plan would make tuition free at public colleges and universities throughout the country.
STOP THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FROM MAKING A PROFIT ON STUDENT LOANS.
Over the next decade, it has been estimated that the federal government will make a profit of over $110 billion on student loan programs. This is morally wrong and it is bad economics. Sen. Sanders will fight to prevent the federal government from profiteering on the backs of college students and use this money instead to significantly lower student loan interest rates.
SUBSTANTIALLY CUT STUDENT LOAN INTEREST RATES.
Under the Sanders plan, the formula for setting student loan interest rates would go back to where it was in 2006. If this plan were in effect today, interest rates on undergraduate loans would drop from 4.29% to just 2.37%.
ALLOW AMERICANS TO REFINANCE STUDENT LOANS AT TODAY’S LOW INTEREST RATES.
It makes no sense that you can get an auto loan today with an interest rate of 2.5%, but millions of college graduates are forced to pay interest rates of 5-7% or more for decades. Under the Sanders plan, Americans would be able to refinance their student loans at today’s low interest rates.
ALLOW STUDENTS TO USE NEED-BASED FINANCIAL AID AND WORK STUDY PROGRAMS TO MAKE COLLEGE DEBT FREE.
The Sanders plan would require public colleges and universities to meet 100% of the financial needs of the lowest-income students. Low-income students would be able to use federal, state and college financial aid to cover room and board, books and living expenses. And Sanders would more than triple the federal work study program to build valuable career experience that will help them after they graduate.
FULLY PAID FOR BY IMPOSING A TAX ON WALL STREET SPECULATORS.
The cost of this $75 billion a year plan is fully paid for by imposing a tax of a fraction of a percent on Wall Street speculators who nearly destroyed the economy seven years ago. More than 1,000 economists have endorsed a tax on Wall Street speculation and today some 40 countries throughout the world have imposed a similar tax including Britain, Germany, France, Switzerland, and China. If the taxpayers of this country could bailout Wall Street in 2008, we can make public colleges and universities tuition free and debt free throughout the country.
POLITICIANS shouldn't be afraid of the nra. Bold Progressives aren't afraid of the nra. The vast majority of Americans support common sense gun legislation, like preventing anyone on the No Fly List from buying a gun. Convicted of domestic violence, you shouldn't be able to buy a gun. Make background checks mandatory for all gun sales. People want common sense gun laws and politicians to stand against the nra. See this from the PCCC / Progressive Change Campaign Committee and click the links and vote on the Open Debate website for questions on the issues we need the presidential candidates, donald drumpf/trump and Hillary Clinton, to discuss and answer. Show the nra they will not control this presidential debate or the next administration or the next congress! Women, wives, mothers, daughters, sisters, aunts, and grandmothers are supporting questions for the next debate, click here to vote for them. And if you want to see the question I submitted (and maybe vote for it) about the CFPB click here.
The ideas with the most votes have the best chance to be asked at the next debate. VOTE NOW!
Replace conservative questions like this...
...with progressive questions like this:
Below is an email the NRA sent their national membership this weekend.
For the presidential "town hall" debate on October 9, ABC and CNN moderators will ask questions with input from the Internet and have agreed to consider the Top 30 questions on the Open Debate Coalition's voting platform.
The NRA is asking their members to "help us get the Second Amendment in the presidential debate" and their question is now #3. In addition to the questions you've already voted for, can you vote for these progressive questions so the candidates debate our issues and ourframing?
Voting Rights (question promoted by a leading civil rights group)
Immigration Reform (submitted by 6 year old girl who doesn't want her parents taken away)
Gun Safety (question from the father of a shooting victim)
The best way to fight a bad guy with an email list...is with a good guy with an email list. Please forward this to others and fight back against the NRA.
-- Keith Rouda, PCCC organizer
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: NRA-ILA <admin@nramedia.org> Date: Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 1:21 AM Subject: Victory Can Be Ours
NEWS
Help Us Get the Second Amendment in the Presidential Debate
Have you ever wanted to personally address the candidates during a presidential debate? Find yourself yelling questions at the moderators through your TV? Don’t worry – you’re not alone. But now, you can actually do something about it. On Sunday, October 9th at 9 p.m. eastern, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump will once again face off as they make their cases to the American public and the moderators have agreed to ask questions submitted and voted on by the general public. -----------------------------------------
Want to support the Warren wing? Senator Elizabeth Warren says, "When PCCC members donate millions in small-dollar donations and make millions of phone calls for progressive candidates, leaders in Washington, they take notice." Chip in $3 here.
HEY MARYLAND DEMOCRATS! You have a roll to play in returning the US Senate to Democratic control and a big roll to make sure the agenda of the US Senate is set by BOLD , PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRATS like Donna Edwards. So much is at stake, the future of our Republic is at stake, and it is vital you remember to vote on 26 APR 16, and that you vote for Donna Edwards for you next senator! Check this out from the PCCC / +BoldProgressives , and click the links to donate to and / or volunteer for her campaign if you can. Remember, every vote counts and DEMOCRACY IS NOT A SPECTATOR SPORT!!!!!
Rachel Maddow opened her interview with Donna Edwards last night saying she "may be on the cusp of pulling off what would be a huge upset in a Senate race in Maryland next week."
Donna started on a nostalgic note, telling Rachel how Prince once gave her backstage passes because of her work fighting domestic violence.
Then Rachel talked about how Donna is taking on the establishment. And Donna made clear what impact her unique voice as a progressive, single mom, working class, African American female would have in the U.S. Senate:
"The voices of so many Marylanders who are middle class families, people who are struggling to get into the middle class, families like mine are really missing from the United States Senate...when all of our voices are at the table, I think we make better decisions."
The New York Times called this race "a fight over the future of the Democratic Party." We need more bold progressives in the U.S. Senate fighting for a $15 minimum wage, debt-free college, expanding Social Security, Wall Street accountability, and campaign finance reform. And more people who will fight against systemic racism.
FOLLOWING +Senator Bernie Sanders win of the 2016 Michigan Democratic primary he has debated hillary clinton in Florida and appeared in the same town hall meeting as her in Ohio. Just as the students and workers and poor and middle class, just as the people of Michigan started to actually pay attention to what the Democratic candidates, not the party leadership, were saying and voted for Bernie 2016 , the same kind of shift is taking place in Ohio, Illinois, Missouri, Florida and N Carolina. Bold Progressive policies that benefit all Americans sound impressive, Bernie's commitment to fight for these policies, to make them reality, is motivating people to vote. Voters in the states holding Democratic primaries tomorrow, Tuesday, 15 MAR 16 owe it to themselves to go to Bernie 2016 to check out his positions on the issues before voting. This from +Democracy Now! (click watch full show for the video) and +CNN .....
Clinton & Sanders Spar on Immigration Reform, Deportations & U.S. Imperialism in Latin America
In the 2016 race for the White House, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders squared off in a debate at Miami-Dade College in Florida sponsored by the Spanish-language network Univision. The two candidates clashed on issues including immigration, trade policy, Latin America and more. Both candidates vowed not to deport children, while Clinton attacked Sanders for opposing a 2007 immigration bill. Sanders also spoke out against U.S. military intervention in Latin America after being shown a 1985 clip of him praising Fidel Castro. "What that was about was saying that the United States was wrong to try to invade Cuba, that the United States was wrong trying to support people to overthrow the Nicaraguan government, that the United States was wrong trying to overthrow in 1954 the democratically elected government of Guatemala," Sanders said. The debate comes one day after Sanders’ surprise victory in the Michigan primary.
TRANSCRIPT
This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.
NERMEENSHAIKH: With less than a week before voters head to the polls in Florida, Illinois, Missouri and North Carolina, Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders sparred last night in a debate in Miami hosted by Univision. Large portions of the debate focused on immigration. Facing questioning by moderator Jorge Ramos, both candidates promised not to deport children or noncriminal undocumented immigrants.
JORGERAMOS: But again, yes or no, can you promise tonight that you won’t deport children, children who are already here?
HILLARYCLINTON: I will not deport children. I would not deport children. I do not want to deport family members, either, Jorge. I want to, as I said, prioritize who would be deported: violent criminals, people planning terrorist attacks, anybody who threatens us. That’s a relatively small universe.
JORGERAMOS: OK, so I want to be very specific. So, you’re telling us tonight that if you become president, you won’t deport children who are already here?
HILLARYCLINTON: I will not.
JORGERAMOS: And that you won’t deport immigrants who don’t have a criminal record.
HILLARYCLINTON: That’s what—that’s what I’m telling you.
JORGERAMOS: Senator, Senator Sanders, will you—can you promise us tonight that you won’t deport children?
SEN. BERNIESANDERS: Now, I happen to agree with President Obama on many, many issues. I think he’s done a great job as president of the United States. He is wrong on this issue of deportation. I disagree with him on that. So, to answer your question, no, I will not deport children from the United States of America.
JORGERAMOS: And can you promise not to deport immigrants who don’t have a criminal record?
SEN. BERNIESANDERS: I can make that promise.
AMYGOODMAN: Hillary Clinton repeatedly criticized Bernie Sanders for voting against a 2007 immigration reform bill.
HILLARYCLINTON: I think our best chance was in 2007, when Ted Kennedy led the charge on comprehensive immigration reform. We had Republican support. We had a president willing to sign it. I voted for that bill. Senator Sanders voted against it.
MARÍA ELENASALINAS: Now, Senator Sanders, in 2007, you voted against immigration reform. You now say that it was because the bill had guest worker provisions which seemed semi-slavery. But back then, this is what you said to CNN’s Lou Dobbs. Let’s listen.
SEN. BERNIESANDERS: If poverty is increasing and if wages are going down, I don’t know why we need millions of people to be coming into this country as guest workers who will work for lower wages than American workers and drive wages down even lower than they are right now.
MARÍA ELENASALINAS: So, Senator, were you concerned with working conditions for guest workers, or really because you think immigrants drive down wages and take jobs from Americans?
SEN. BERNIESANDERS: Well, you have guest worker programs that have been described by the Southern Poverty Law Center, one of the important institutions in this country who studies these issues, as guest worker programs akin to slavery, where people came in, they were cheated, they were abused, they were humiliated, and if they stood up for their rights, they would be thrown out of the country. Of course that type of effort leads to a race to the bottom for all of our people.
HILLARYCLINTON: You know, I think it’s very hard to make the case that Ted Kennedy, Barack Obama, me, La Raza, United Farm Workers, Dolores Huerta, leaders of the Latino community, would have supported a bill that actually promoted modern slavery. That was one of the many excuses used not to vote for the 2007 bill.
NERMEENSHAIKH: While Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders took jabs at Donald Trump, Clinton was questioned about her voting record to expand security along the Mexican border.
MARÍA ELENASALINAS: But the question is: What is the difference between the wall that you voted for and Donald Trump’s wall?
HILLARYCLINTON: It’s a big difference. I mean, first of all, as I understand him, he’s talking about a very tall wall—right?—a beautiful, tall wall, the most beautiful, tall wall, better than the Great Wall of China, that would run the entire border, that he would somehow magically get the Mexican government to pay for. And, you know, it’s just fantasy. And, in fact, if he cared to know anything about what members of Congress, like the senator and I, have done, where it was necessary, we did support some fencing. Where it was necessary, we did add Border Patrol agents. We have done what by any fair estimate would have to conclude is a good job, quote, "securing the border." So let’s get about the business of comprehensive immigration reform.
SEN. BERNIESANDERS: Let me just say—
MARÍA ELENASALINAS: Senator?
SEN. BERNIESANDERS: The secretary and I mostly, I think, agree on this issue. Look, in this country, immigration reform is a very hot debate. It’s divided the country. But I would hope very much that as we have that debate, we do not, as Donald Trump and others have done, resort to racism and xenophobia and bigotry. This idea of suddenly, one day or maybe a night, rounding up 11 million people and taking them outside of this country is a vulgar, absurd idea that I would hope very few people in America support.
AMYGOODMAN: The candidates also discussed the Puerto Rican debt crisis.
HILLARYCLINTON: The Congress must give authority to Puerto Rico to restructure its debts, just like it has—it has enabled states and cities to restructure their debt. And it is a grave injustice for the Congress, led by the Republicans, to be refusing to enact that opportunity within the bankruptcy law.
And what we see in Puerto Rico now is a lot of suffering. We see, you know, schools being closed. We see healthcare being denied. And we see a thousand Puerto Rican families a month moving to the United States, mostly to Florida. Puerto Ricans are citizens of America. They deserve to be treated as citizens and to be given the opportunity to get back on their feet economically.
SEN. BERNIESANDERS: When you get to Puerto Rico, there’s an issue that we have not talked about. That little island is $73 billion in debt, and the government now is paying interest rates of up to 11 percent. And many of the bonds that they are paying off were purchased by vulture capitalists for 30 cents on the dollar. And what I have said in talking to the leaders of Puerto Rico, we’ve got to bring people together. And it’s not the people of Puerto Rico or the children—
KARENTUMULTY: Senator—OK.
SEN. BERNIESANDERS: —or the schools, but maybe some of these vulture capitalists who are going to have to lose a little bit of money in this process.
NERMEENSHAIKH: During the debate, Univision questioned Bernie Sanders about comments he made during the 1980s about Cuba and Nicaragua.
MARÍA ELENASALINAS: In 1985, you praised the Sandinista government, and you said that Daniel Ortega was an impressive guy. This is what you said about Fidel Castro. Let’s listen.
MAYORBERNIESANDERS: You may recall way back in—when was it?—1961, they invaded Cuba. And everybody was totally convinced that Castro was the worst guy in the world, all the Cuban people were going to rise up in rebellion against Fidel Castro. They forgot that he educated their kids, gave them healthcare, totally transformed the society.
MARÍA ELENASALINAS: In South Florida, there are still open wounds among some exiles regarding socialism and communism. So please explain what is the difference between the socialism—
SEN. BERNIESANDERS: Well—
MARÍA ELENASALINAS: —that you profess and the socialism in Nicaragua, Cuba and Venezuela.
SEN. BERNIESANDERS: Well, let me just answer that. What that was about was saying that the United States was wrong to try to invade Cuba, that the United States was wrong trying to support people to overthrow the Nicaraguan government, that the United States was wrong trying to overthrow in 1954 the government—democratically elected government of Guatemala. Throughout the history of our relationship with Latin America, we’ve operated under the so-called Monroe Doctrine. And that said that the United States had the right do anything that they wanted to do in Latin America.
So I actually went to Nicaragua, and I very strongly opposed the Reagan administration’s effort to overthrow that government. And I strongly opposed earlier Henry Kissinger and the—to overthrow the government of Salvador Allende in Chile. I think the United States should be working with governments around the world, not get involved in regime change. And all of these actions, by the way, in Latin America brought forth a lot of very strong anti-American sentiments. That’s what that was about.
HILLARYCLINTON: And I just want to add one thing to the question you were asking Senator Sanders. I think in that same interview he praised what he called the revolution of values in Cuba and talked about how people were working for the common good, not for themselves. I just couldn’t disagree more. You know, if the values are that you oppress people, you disappear people, you imprison people, even kill people, for expressing their opinions, for expressing freedom of speech, that is not the kind of revolution of values that I ever want to see anywhere.
NERMEENSHAIKH: At the Univision debate, Hillary Clinton was also questioned about her use of a private email server while she was secretary of state.
JORGERAMOS: So, who specifically gave you permission to operate your email system as you did? Was it President Barack Obama? And would you drop out of the race if you get indicted?
HILLARYCLINTON: Well, Jorge, there’s a lot of questions in there. And I’m going to give the same answer I’ve been giving for many months. It wasn’t the best choice. I made a mistake. It was not prohibited. It was not in any way disallowed. And as I’ve said and as now has come out, my predecessors did the same thing, and many other people in the government.
JORGERAMOS: The questions were: Who gave you permission to operate?
HILLARYCLINTON: There—there—
JORGERAMOS: Was it President Obama?
HILLARYCLINTON: There was no permission to be asked. It had been done by my predecessors. It was permitted. I didn’t have to ask anyone.
JORGERAMOS: If you get indicted, would you drop out?
HILLARYCLINTON: Oh, for goodness—that is not going to happen. I’m not even answering that question.
AMYGOODMAN: Highlights from last night’s Univision debate in Miami, Florida. It was the last Democratic debate before voters go to the polls in Florida, Illinois, Missouri, North Carolina and Ohio.
THE PCCC / Bold Progressives have been working hard in 2015 to have a major influence in the 2016 elections, from the presidential to congressional, state and local elections. Our support of +Senator Elizabeth Warren D MA got her appointed to the Democratic National Committee so we now have a powerful voice influencing the party's platform and agenda. +Senator Bernie Sanders I VT presidential campaign is being supported by the PCCC. Below are some of the highlights of 2015, check out the PCCC website for more on our progressive policies, actions and candidates and join the movement to restore America to our full potential for all Americans, not just the 1%. Followed by the +TIME article on the PCCC.....
This New Year, let’s be proud of what we did together in 2015!
1. Big Ideas Project:
Democrats lost the 2014 election because they lacked big ideas that
inspire voters. So the Progressive Change Institute launched the Big
Ideas Project, calling for a bold new agenda. PCCC members submitted
their own ideas and voted on others, casting over one million votes.
Polling showed that big progressive ideas are popular with Democrats,
Independents, and Republicans alike. These results were shared with
dozens of members of Congress and presidential campaigns -- leading to
many high-profile endorsements of the big ideas submitted by PCCC
members.
Historic first: TV ad for debt-free college
We organized events on campuses.
2. Debt-Free College Campaign:
One of the most popular ideas from the Big Ideas Project was
debt-free college -- the idea that students should be able to graduate
from any public college or university without debt.
Thanks to your phone calls, letters to the editor, and nearly
half-a-million petition signatures, as well as a strong lobbying effort
and coalition of allies like Demos and Democracy for America, we now
have over 100 congressional co-sponsors on a resolution calling for
debt-free college! Plus all 3 Democratic presidential candidates have
called for debt-free college, legislators in 10 states are planning
their own local efforts, and TV ads are hitting the airwaves. By next
year, there will be a major mandate in this country for debt-free
college… because of you.
As Bloomberg News reports, “The phrase ‘debt-free college’ was hardly
present in the national political lexicon until the Progressive Change
Campaign Committee launched a campaign in January to push Democrats to
support the idea.” 3. Impact on the Presidential Debates:
We’ve been pushing these “big ideas” into the political mainstream,
and the presidential debates are one great example of our success.
In all three Democratic debates, the candidates brought up issues
like debt-free college, expanding Social Security, and Wall Street
accountability! Meanwhile, our “Twitter army” helped spread bold
progressive messages, sending thousands of tweets to 125 key reporters
before and during the first debate -- helping to shape the narrative for
the presidential race.
Sneak preview: In 2016, get ready for Open Debates -- where
moderators ask questions directly submitted and voted on by the public.
Sen. Warren at National Candidate Training
Candidates at the 2015 Candidate Training
4. National Candidate Training
Who could forget the National Candidate Training?
Nearly 200 local, state, and federal candidates gathered in
Washington DC for four days of intensive work in fundraising, messaging,
and field. The training gave these bold progressives all the tools they
need to win. The candidates even took professional headshots and
launched their websites with the help of our talented team.
If you are a potential candidate, or know a progressive candidate who might benefit from our trainings, the application is here.
For a trip down memory lane, check out the TIME magazine article about our “quest to create hundreds of Elizabeth Warrens” here. 5. Big Improvements in Campaign Software:
How do we support these "hundreds of Elizabeth Warrens"? We give them our easy-to-use campaign software!
Candidates can now design their own website, run their own email
program, manage their endorsements and press contacts, and download
templates and guides. We use this software to help hundreds of
progressive candidates running for local, state, and federal office all
over the country. If you are running for office (or know someone who is)
you can request your own account here.
Al Franken teamed up with PCCC members.
6. Net Neutrality Victory:
Americans won a huge victory in February when the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) issued a rule that stopped cable and
phone companies from speeding up some web services while slowing down
others -- making Net Neutrality the law of the land.
When a reporter asked President Obama about the PCCC's activism, the
White House urged the FCC to do the right thing. Working with a big
coalition, PCCC members gathered 147,000 petition signatures, submitted
25,000 public comments to the FCC, and made thousands of phone calls to
members of Congress. We also partnered with Hollywood celebrities, video
gamers, and political heroes like Sen. Al Franken to mobilize the
public on this issue. What a great win! 7. Ready for Boldness:
In March and April, over 5,000 political leaders signed our “Ready
for Boldness” letter, calling on all Democratic presidential candidates
to run on “big, bold, economic populist ideas” like debt-free college,
expanding Social Security, and breaking up big Wall Street banks.
This received media attention everywhere from the New York Times to
MSNBC -- and set the tone for the 2016 election. Nearly 50,000 PCCC
members signed on, creating extra momentum! (At the same time, the
number of Senate Democrats who support expanding Social Security jumped
from 7 to 42! Huge momentum for bold ideas!)
PCCC Co-Founders with the "Warren wing" of American politics
8. We Hired Progressive Lobbyists:
Elizabeth Warren often points out that Wall Street has hundreds of lobbyists in Congress. We’re fighting back.
Thousands of PCCC members donated to help hire two progressive
lobbyists on Capitol Hill, to build a staff for P Street -- the
progressive alternative to K Street.
When you hear about 100 members of Congress supporting debt-free
college, other big ideas from PCCC members being introduced in Congress,
or media events that highlight heroes like Elizabeth Warren, you can
thank this progressive lobbying operation -- and the PCCC members who made it happen!
Solidarity Panel with representatives from Planned Parenthood and Black Lives Matter
9. Solidarity with Planned Parenthood and Black Lives Matter:
When Rep. Hank Johnson introduced his proposal for special
prosecutors to investigate police killings, PCCC members took action in
support of that bill.
When Planned Parenthood was under attack -- both verbally from
Republicans in Congress, and literally from domestic terrorists -- we
responded by raising tens of thousands of dollars directly for Planned
Parenthood.
PCCC members have stepped up this year in solidarity with these two movements.
Joseline Peña-Melnyk, one of our early endorsed candidates, takes part in our Advanced Candidate Training
10. 2016 Endorsements:
Thousands of PCCC members donated a combined $600,000 to the first 2016 “Warren wing” candidates.
We endorsed great progressives early in their U.S. Senate races --
Russ Feingold in Wisconsin and Donna Edwards in Maryland. And we
endorsed three progressive champs running in competitive U.S. House
primaries -- Joseline Peña-Melnyk (MD-4), Jamie Raskin (MD-8), and
Susannah Randolph (FL-8).
Our team is now working deeply with all these candidates to make sure
their campaigns are as strong as possible. Get ready for more “Warren
wing” endorsements in 2016!
We accomplished so much together in 2015. And we look forward to more big fights and progressive victories together in 2016!
Thanks for being a bold progressive. And Happy New Year!
Stephanie, Adam, Sarah, Kayla, Lacey, Keith, Kenton, Marissa, Ethan,
Jackie, DeVeria, Max, Jen, Courtney, Ryan, Ian, Summer, Doug, Abby, and
Molly.
(The PCCC Team) Want to support the Warren wing? Senator Elizabeth Warren
says, "When PCCC members donate millions in small-dollar donations and
make millions of phone calls for progressive candidates, leaders in
Washington, they take notice." Chip in $3 here.
Paid for by the Progressive Change Campaign Committee PAC (www.BoldProgressives.org)
and not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.
Contributions to the PCCC are not deductible as charitable contributions
for federal income tax purposes.
Bloomberg—Bloomberg via Getty ImagesSenator Elizabeth Warren, a Democrat from
Massachusetts, listens to Janet Yellen, chair of the U.S. Federal
Reserve, during her semiannual report on the economy to the Senate
Banking Committee in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Thursday, July 16, 2015.
“Elizabeth—she’s here?”
The thumbs up came from the back of the meeting room, and two hundred
future Sen. Elizabeth Warrens stood up and waited for their prototype
to enter. Spindly and with a bouncy step, the Massachusetts senator
strode rapidly into the room and was waylaid by a friendly sea of
imperfect facsimiles calling for selfies. “What a way to start the
morning!” Warren said at last, breathless at the podium.
Warren was stopping by a conference on Thursday just a 10-minute walk
away from the Capitol building in Washington DC, where the goal was
unabashedly to bolster the Warren brand of the Democratic party. In the
belly of the swank Washington Court Hotel—also the host of a recent
events for steel wire producers and the beef industry—progressive
candidates for municipal and state office across the country had
gathered for a four-day affair to create a surge of Democratic
candidates in municipal and state elections, and build a movement of
rookie Warrens.
The conference, organized by the advocacy group Progressive Change
Campaign Committee, was intended to train candidates and activists from
states far flung as Wisconsin and Louisiana to run for office and
eventually shape national policy. TIME was one of the only publications
granted access to the meeting.
Much of the focus was on the nuts and bolts of effective campaigning
and fundraising. Questions flew: Do candidates need to fundraise within
their own district? How much time should candidates spend on fundraising
calls? How do you best target voters during get-out-the-vote efforts?
Should candidates’ events have red wine, or are cookies enough? The PCCC
offered candidates who attended back-end internet tools replete with
website templates, and readymade email blasters and event managers.
And Warren was the star attraction. “You are the progressive bench,
and we need a bench,” Warren told them. Dozens of attendees wore
identical blue shirts that said, I’m from the Elizabeth Warren wing of the Democratic party.
“Elizabeth Warren is the North Star,” said Adam Green, co-founder of
the PCCC. And the enthusiasm for Warren has spilled over all across the
left: “I want to clone Elizabeth Warren into every candidate,” said
Tefere Gebre the executive vice president of the AFL-CIO, in an
interview with TIME two weeks ago.
In the Washington hotel, building an army of Warrens to challenge
establishment-backed Democrats was exactly the point. “Yes, this is
about building campaigns and winning office, but this is also about
building a movement,” Warren said during her keynote on Thursday. “You
are the living spark of the progressive movement.” It was a sentiment
made clear by the conference organizers. “How do we elect 300 more
Elizabeth Warrens?” said Stephanie Taylor, the co-founder of the PCCC
who dreamt up the conference. “This training is part of it: finding them
and giving them the tools to run great campaigns.”
Movement-building with Warren in the lead is in part about catching
up to conservatives. Republicans can boast of presidential candidates
Ted Cruz and Rand Paul, Rush Limbaugh and a formidable coalition of
right-wing legislators threatening to unseat their house speaker.
Meanwhile the left has a few big-city mayors, a struggling cable network
(MSNBC), handful of legislators (Sherrod Brown, Keith Ellison) and a
upstart presidential candidate, Sen. Bernie Sanders, who counts Eugene
V. Debs and the nation of Denmark among his biggest influences. And
Warren, the progressive nonpareil, has refused to run for the White
House.
Anger over the Obama years is a key motivator for conservatives. The
stimulant on the left is made of a milder sauce, namely, disappointment
over the Obama years, and many progressive ideals have faltered in
Congress and on their way to the White House.
Republicans have taken notice of Warrens influence over Democrats.
While the activists met in Washington, her name came up on the
Republican campaign trail in Cedar Falls, Iowa. “The fact is the
Democratic Party has a problem,” New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie said.
“Their problem is that Elizabeth Warren is taking over that party.”
“They’re all running to be just like Elizabeth Warren,” he added,
saying that Hillary Clinton has borrowed from Warren’s playbook on the
campaign trail.
Though Warren was only present for the first hour of the four-day
training session, her name came up again and again. When she ran for
Senate in 2012, Warren liked to make fundraising calls from her kitchen
at home while boiling a pot of tea and wearing a headset, an alumna of
Warren’s fundraising team, Sarah Badawi, told trainees. Joel Silberman, a
speech trainer, said in a session that when he consulted Warren before a
Massachusetts state convention speech, he told Warren a trick to cure
nerves: count the number of steps to the podium.
Taylor and Green of the PCCC once sat on Warren’s front porch and
shared lemonade and iced tea to convince her to first run for Senate,
Warren noted during her address. The former director of research for
Warren’s senatorial campaign, Peter Jones led a class on opposition
research. (A quick Google search on Warren’s defeated opponent for
Senate, Scott Brown, shows him shirtless in photos hawking diet pills, a
fact that Warren recently noted in a speech.)
Most of those hoping to follow Warren’s lead at the conference don’t
look anything like her or share her Ivy League background. There was the
black state senator who represents Ferguson, an Indian-American
candidate for Congress from a Detroit suburb, and as many pairs of
sneakers as suits. Union organizers, mothers, climate activists,
feminists and campaign staffers were in Washington from Vermont and
Georgia.
“You are a part of a global re-owning of a populist, progressive
vision of America,” said Zephyr Teachout, chief executive of the Mayday
PAC which aims to get money out of politics.
Many at the conference argued local victories could sway their
states, and ultimately, Congress. Over a lunch of ravioli and
tagliatelli with lemon sauce and iced tea, two attendees from Rhode
Island debated the merits of the conference. “The more states have
something like paid leave, and it’s successful, the more likely we’ll be
able to get Congress to move it forward,” Shandi Hanna, an activist at
the Women’s Fund of Rhode Island. “We need to infiltrate the system and
change it.”
“You look around this room people—the people I’ve met makes me
realize the country is moving in a good direction,” said Margaux
Morisseau, a candidate for Rhode Island state Senate.
So far, the left has been unable to create the kind of movement that
caught fire on the right after President Obama’s election. But in some
ways, things have changed in recent years. Cities and states like
California and Rhode Island are requiring businesses to provide paid
family leave; activists in New York, Los Angeles and Seattle have with
mixed success pushed for a $15-minium wage; Bernie Sanders has attracted
crowds of 10,000 and more in purple and red states like Wisconsin and
Arizona. To progressives, those are signs of shifting winds. “People
will start to realize there’s a change happening from underneath.
They’ll either have to evolve or die,” said Chris Larson, a state
senator in Wisconsin.
Some date the recent wave in progressive activism back to Howard
Dean’s 2004 campaign. A left-backed candidate, Dean’s loss in the
primary spawned Democracy for America, a progressive PAC. The past five
years has seen a slow increase in organizational support for progressive
Democrats. DFA, MoveOn.org, Progressive Majority also aim to train
progressive candidates for office.
It’s Warren’s message that has helped motivate them in recent years,
and attendees repeatedly mentioned Warren’s name during the conference.
“We can whine about this, we can whimper about this, or we can fight
back,” Warren said Thursday. “I’m fighting back!”
The goal, of course, is victory against Republicans, and against
old-line Democrats in primary contests. If they win, it will come the
way of conquerors of old: by conversion, or a rout.
“It’s our movement,” said CM! Winters Palacio, a Chicago librarian
(with punctuation in her first name) who is running for City Council and
says she is facing pushback from the moderate Democratic mayor, Rahm
Emmanuel. “We will eat the elephant one bite at a time.”