NORTON META TAG

Showing posts with label economic equality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label economic equality. Show all posts

22 August 2025

DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST OF AMERICA / DSA: LEVEL THE PLAYING FIELD

 


Politicians should be forced to retire at 77, the average American lifespan. Pay should be capped at $60K - the average American salary. Healthcare should cost them minimally $500/month, like we pay. If you want to represent the us, live like us.

THE above is from a facebook post by U.S. Democratic Socialist. It expresses opinions I have held for a few years now because, I do not believe employees of Americans (i.e. politicians) should be paid more than the average American's salary nor should their benefits exceed those of average Americans. I would level the playing field even more and make sure politicians vacation time, sick time, family leave time, child care, family care, elder care, and maternity leave is the same as the average American's. Politicians are the only employees who are able to make sure they are paid more than and their benefits exceed those of their employers, the American people. It is time for that to stop. My e mails to my representative and senators are at the end of this post.....

MY E MAILS TO REP SUBRAMANYAM D-VA 10TH, SEN WARNER D-VA AND SEN KAINE D-VA

Politicians should be forced to retire at 77, the average American lifespan. Pay should be capped at $60K - the average American salary. Healthcare should cost them minimally $500/month, like we pay. If you want to represent the US, live like us.

The above is from a facebook post by U.S. Democratic Socialist. It expresses opinions I have held for a few years now because, I do not believe employees of Americans (i.e. politicians) should be paid more than the average American's salary nor should their benefits exceed those of average Americans. I would level the playing field even more and make sure politicians vacation time, sick time, family leave time, child care, family care, elder care, and maternity leave is the same as the average American's. Politicians are the only employees who are able to make sure they are paid more than and their benefits exceed those of their employers, the American people. It is time for that to stop. I expect you to introduce and support legislation that will establish a mandatory retirement age for members of Congress and bring congressional pay and benefits in line with the averages of the American people. 


09 June 2017

TOM PERRIELLO FOR GOVERNOR OF VIRGINIA

CHECK out these ads from the Perriello campaign, they give you an introduction to the man we need to elect as our next governor. Then go to Tom Perriello's campaign website, check out his issues page, you will be impressed with his bold, progressive views and campaign platform. Donate if you can, and please vote for Tom this coming Tuesday, 13 JUN 17 in the Democratic primary. The polls are open from 0600 / 6:00 AM to 1900 / 7:00 PM. Remember, DEMOCRACY IS NOT A SPECTATOR SPORT!

Tom Perriello Releases Two New TV Ads, Featuring Sen. Elizabeth Warren, Outlining His Vision for Virginia, and Urging Voters to Believe ‘Progress is Possible’

Today, Tom Perriello is releasing the fourth and fifth ads of his Democratic campaign for Virginia governor. The ads will air across Virginia in the final eight days of the primary campaign.
In the first ad, “Make Change,” U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren, who has endorsed Tom, speaks about Tom’s values, saying, “He’s somebody who says: I am going to make change — and I’m gonna make change not for the richest, not for the most powerful. I’m gonna make change to make this economy work better for hard-working families. That’s who he is.” The ad features footage from Tom’s rally with U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders this spring and his 2010 rally with President Barack Obama in Charlottesville, before closing with Tom speaking about his vision to leave no race or region behind in giving Virginians opportunities to succeed. Finally, Virginians are urged to vote June 13 as Tom says, “Let’s prove that Donald Trump’s values are not Virginia values.”
The second ad, “Progress is Possible,” features Tom speaking directly to Virginians, urging them to believe that progress is possible, despite threats to our values by President Donald Trump. “We’re not a nation of hate,” Tom says, before speaking of his family’s immigrant history. He then goes on to outline his agenda and vision for Virginia as governor, saying, “I’m running for governor because every Virginian deserves a shot, regardless of race or region. That means higher wages, good jobs in forgotten communities, and lower student debt. It won’t happen overnight, but we can never stop believing progress is possible.”
The ads will air statewide, joining previously released ads on air, until primary day, June 13.

Full ad transcript for ‘Make Change’:
U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren on Tom Perriello: He’s a guy with values. He’s somebody who says: I am going to make change — and I’m gonna make change not for the richest, not for the most powerful. I’m gonna make change to make this economy work better for hard-working families. That’s who he is.
Tom Perriello: I’m Tom Perriello, and as governor, I’ll fight to make sure every Virginian gets a fair shot, that leaves no region or race behind. Let’s prove that Donald Trump’s values are not Virginia values.
Full ad transcript for ‘Progress is Possible’:
We’re not a nation of hate. My immigrant grandfather came to America with a dream, and my dad lived it as a pediatrician here in Virginia. But these values are threatened by President Trump and an economy where too many struggle to get by.
I’m Tom Perriello, and I’m running for governor because every Virginian deserves a shot, regardless of race or region. That means higher wages, good jobs in forgotten communities, and lower student debt.
It won’t happen overnight, but we can never stop believing progress is possible.


22 September 2014

IOWA IS KEY TO DEMOCRATS HOLDING THE SENATE, PLEASE SUPPORT BOLD PROGESSIVE BRUCE BRALEY 21SEP14

REP BRUCE BRALEY D IA is in a very tight race for the US Senate seat from Iowa. The PCCC / BoldProgressives.org is supporting him because he is a Progressive Democrat. His victory in the Iowa election is vital to the Democratic Party keeping control of the Senate, protecting us from the extreme right wing agenda of the koch brothers /corporate America republican controlled House. If you can please donate to Bruce Braley's campaign (I did, $5.00), and if you are in Iowa please consider volunteering for his campaign. From the PCCC / Progressive Change Campaign Committee



Huge news out of Iowa: Two polls this past week showed Bruce Braley, the populist progressive who's running to replace Senator Tom Harkin, edging out his right-wing opponent.
This is big. His Tea Party opponent -- the one who ran infamous ads about castrating pigs -- got a lot of help from the Koch Brothers and special interests this summer. She spent much of the summer narrowly ahead.
Here's what one political analyst said about this race on ABC's This Week:
"If you ask me what race on Election Night will determine who takes the Senate, whether the Democrats keep it or the Republicans take it, Iowa is it. And if the Republicans take Iowa, they're taking the Senate back."
Can you chip in $3 to help bold progressive Bruce Braley build on his narrow lead in the polls -- and prevent a Republican takeover? Donate here.
Bruce Braley is exactly who should be replacing Tom Harkin in the Senate. Progressive Sen. Tom Harkin told supporters this past week:
"If you want to thank me for my service, there is really only one way I want you to do that. Make sure that this Senate seat remains in good, fighting, progressive hands with Congressman Bruce Braley."
Elizabeth Warren endorsed Bruce Braley in an email to PCCC members, saying, "Bruce Braley led the Populist Caucus in the House of Representatives – and is focused on economic fairness, investing in education, and addressing our retirement crisis."
Please chip in $3 to help Bruce Braley keep his lead and defend against corporate money and attacks in the coming weeks.
Thanks for being a bold progressive.
-- Keith Rouda, PCCC organizer

02 December 2011

One Percenter Calls For 'Enlightened Self Interest' To Avert Real Class Warfare 2DEZ11

NOT all 1%ers are greedy pigs. Some recognize the social contract they have with the nation, and know income inequality is wrong. Some of them have joined together in the group called Patriotic Millionaires For Fiscal Strength, advocating for higher taxes on the wealthy, those making over 1 million dollars a year. Typically, the repiglicans and tea-baggers response has been for these people to donate the difference between what these people pay in taxes and what they think they should be paying to the US Treasury. That is rejected by the PMFS because it doesn't fulfill the social contract obligation the rich have to the nation and would only go to subsidizing the truly greed of the 1%. Check out this call from Dan Berger on HuffPost, a millionaire, in support of higher taxes on the wealthy, and take the time to click on the link to their website. You can sign their letter to congress to raise taxes on the 1% even if you're not a millionaire!

Some conservatives complain it's class warfare to harp on income inequality and to say the rich should pay higher taxes. Philadelphia's Dan Berger, an avowed member of the richest 1 percent of Americans, says calling attention to uneven incomes is a step toward averting class warfare.
"The wealthy in this country have the biggest stake because they own the most wealth and property," said Berger, who made his millions as a trial lawyer pursuing antitrust, environmental, and civil and human rights cases. "Since they have the biggest stake, they have the biggest stake in ensuring harmonious political and social relations and conditions in society."
Berger, 64, is a major donor to liberal causes and the Democratic party, which he would like to prevail in its effort to reduce the deficit by raising taxes on millionaires such as himself. To that end, he joined a group called "Patriotic Millionaires for Fiscal Strength," which is devoted to lobbying for taxes on its own members -- the super rich.
Incomes for the wealthiest 1 percent of Americans grew faster than for any other income group over the past few decades, according to a recent report from economists at the Congressional Budget Office. From 1979 to 2007, the richest 1 percent saw their after-tax income soar by 275 percent. It grew by 65 percent for the next 19 percent, under 40 percent for the next 60 percent, and just 18 percent for the bottom fifth of taxpayers.
It's against this backdrop Congress is wrestling with how to shrink the federal budget deficit, with Republicans opposed to tax increases and Democrats against spending cuts to social programs. The Obama administration has said allowing the expiration of Bush-era tax cuts for households earning more than $250,000 would raise $866 billion over 10 years. Democrats have also pushed proposals to hike rates solely on those earning more than $1 million per year.
Berger said he sees widening income inequality as a moral wrong, but also something the well-off should worry about for more practical reasons. "In enlightened self interest you would think the wealthy would go along with [reducing economic inequality]," he said. "There are a limited number of countries you can pack up and move to in the event things get totally out of control."
He said the unrest manifested as Occupy Wall Street protests across the country represents the "tip of the iceberg" in terms of what could happen if people really get angry one day. "I do see a link between the Patriotic Millionaires and Occupy Wall Street," Berger said. "They dramatized the issue. I think just dramatizing the issue is a step forward."

23 September 2011

Elizabeth Warren Blasts GOP 'Class Warfare' Charge, Tax Cuts For The Rich (VIDEO) 22SEP11

POLITICAL correctness may require candidates to say the Democrats aren't waging class warfare. The truth is the repiglicans and tea-baggers started this round of class warfare right after the election of President Obama, and they have been waging it against the poor, the retired, the working class and the middle class in America. This is class warfare, it is a battle to stop our Republic turning into a plutocracy, to stop the nations descent to Third World status. It is class warfare against the gross economic inequality in this country, the shameful increase in the number of Americans, especially children, in poverty. It is class warfare against the gop / tea-baggers plans to destroy the social safety net and Social Security and the insatiable greed and lust for power of corporate America. So this is class warfare, and the repiglicans and tea-baggers are on the wrong side.

Elizabeth Warren, Democratic Senate candidate in Massachusetts and former White House financial reform adviser, blasted Republicans at an appearance In Andover last month for accusing Democrats of engaging in "class warfare."
"I hear all this, you know, 'Well, this is class warfare, this is whatever,'" Warren said. "No. There is nobody in this country who got rich on his own -- nobody."
Republican lawmakers have criticized President Barack Obama in recent weeks for engaging in "class warfare." House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) argued in an op-ed last month that the president was “anti-business, hyper-regulatory [and] pro-tax” and “fueled by efforts to incite class warfare."
House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) had a similar criticism after Obama unveiled his new deficit reduction plan this month, which features a proposed tax on millionaires, saying “Class warfare isn’t leadership.”
In Andover, Warren went on to discuss the "social contract" and how it benefits everyone:
“You built a factory out there? Good for you. But I want to be clear: you moved your goods to market on the roads the rest of us paid for; you hired workers the rest of us paid to educate; you were safe in your factory because of police forces and fire forces that the rest of us paid for. You didn’t have to worry that marauding bands would come and seize everything at your factory, and hire someone to protect against this, because of the work the rest of us did. “Now look, you built a factory and it turned into something terrific, or a great idea? God bless. Keep a big hunk of it. But part of the underlying social contract is you take a hunk of that and pay forward for the next kid who comes along.”
Democrats have fought back against the "class warfare" charges by drawing attention to the dramatic cuts that Republicans have proposed to programs benefiting low- and middle-income Americans.
Obama disputed the claim during a speech on Monday, saying his newest plan "is not class warfare. It’s math."
Warren -- who formally entered the Senate race less than two weeks ago -- currently has a slight edge over her competitor, Republican Scott Brown, according to a recent poll by the Democratic-affiliated firm Public Policy Polling.
Her comments were captured on video and posted to YouTube by an individual who claims not to be involved with Warren's campaign, according to Talking Points Memo.

02 March 2011

Asked If Bank Of America Paying Nothing In Corporate Taxes Is Fair, Pawlenty Responds: Taxes Are ‘Too High’ 2MAR11

NO question here about who tim pawlenty represents, he is owned and controlled by corporate America. If you think things are bad now, just think what will happen to this country if he would be elected president! I just can't understand how people can support any politician who kow-tows to corporate masters and defends their not paying taxes. How do these people feel they are going to benefit from allowing this to continue? Where do they think the money for even the basic government services is going to come from? Can these people really be so ignorant to believe it is OK for these corporations to not pay taxes? Tea-baggers, how is supporting this attitude going to improve your lives? THINK ABOUT IT!!! From ThinkProgress....
ThinkProgress filed this report from the Tea Party Patriots Policy Summit in Phoenix, AZ.
Last weekend, Americans around the country organized “Main Street Movement” protests to stand in solidarity with organized labor and demand that corporate interests pay their fair share. As ThinkProgress has reported, many of the nation’s largest corporate interests pay literally nothing in corporate income taxes. ExxonMobil made nearly $20 billion in profits in 2009, but paid nothing in corporate income taxes. Other extremely profitable companies GE, CitiGroup, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, and Boeing similarly have had entire quarters or years without paying corporate income taxes.
At the Tea Party summit last weekend, we spoke to former Gov. Tim Pawlenty (R-MN), a prospective GOP presidential candidate, about corporate tax cheats. Asked about Bank of America, another wildly profitable American bank that paid nothing in corporate taxes in 2009, Pawlenty simply relied “Well actually the corporate tax rate in Minnesota and around the country is too high.” Reminded several times that Bank of America doesn’t pay it’s corporate taxes, regardless of rates, Pawlenty said that both exemptions and rates should be lowered. However, he again emphasized that he was not troubled, or even aware, of corporate tax dodging, and that corporate tax rates should be reduced:
FANG: Governor, today liberals are demonstrating all over the country in what CBS has called a liberal version of the Tea Party. Their main complaint is that a lot of corporations aren’t paying their fair share. For example, Bank of America, in 2009 paid nothing in corporate income taxes, same with ExxonMobil, GE, and a lot of other big corporations. Do you think corporations like Bank of America should pay their fair share? What are your thoughts on that?
PAWLENTY: Well actually the corporate tax rate in Minnesota and around the country is too high. And I think one thing we could and should do is–
FANG: You think zero is too high with Bank of America paying nothing?
PAWLENTY: We have the highest corporate tax rate, or one of them, in the world–
FANG: But they use loopholes and offshore bank accounts to pay nothing.
PAWLENTY: The things I’ve called for is reducing tax rates and looking at exemptions or special deals within the tax code that give certain companies privileges or benefits. I can’t speak individually to any country, company would get in that regard, but I think one goal or direction is to simplify and reduce tax rates and clean out as many of the special deals as possible.
FANG: To be clear, do you think Bank of America pays too much in taxes already?
PAWLENTY: I don’t know what Bank of America pays in taxes. I’ll just say, setting aside Bank of America, the corporate tax rate in America is too high compared to our competitor nations.
Watch it:

In 2009, as Bank of America made billions in untaxed profits, the firm’s top executives received pay “ranging from $6 million to nearly $30 million.”
Even Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ), a Republican well to the right of Pawlenty on most issues, told us that corporate tax dodgers “broke the law.” As he prepares to run for president, Pawlenty has positioned himself close to the corporate right. Last year, we broke a story about how bailed out banks — still on the hook for taxpayer money — were funneling cash to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to kill financial reform. We asked Pawlenty if he had any problem with taxpayer-owned banks secretly lobbying against reforms for their industry. He didn’t.

17 February 2011

Workers toppled a dictator in Egypt, but might be silenced in Wisconsin 17FEB11

WHAT did the voters, those who did vote and those who didn't (it is important to note that those who didn't vote basically voted for the governor), expect when they elected this right wing tea bagger as governor? Freedom? Democracy? He already showed his allegiance to extreme right wing politics and the corporate interest who own him when he canceled the federal investment in high speed rail that would have brought approximately $810 million in federal funds (paying for the entire project) for jobs to the state (see my earlier post on this blog NEW GOP GOVERNORS KILL $1.2 BILLION IN HIGH SPEED RAIL JOBS 6NOV10). Now he is implementing his program to make Wisconsin the leader in turning America into a Third World country a la the agenda of grover norquist by attacking unions and worker's rights. So Wisconsin, how is that extreme right wing tea-bagger agenda working out for ya now???

By Harold Meyerson
Wednesday, February 16, 2011;


In Egypt, workers are having a revolutionary February. In the United States, by contrast, February is shaping up as the cruelest month workers have known in decades.
The coup de grace that toppled Hosni Mubarak came after tens of thousands of Egyptian workers went on strike beginning last Tuesday. By Friday, when Egypt's military leaders apparently decided that unrest had reached the point where Mubarak had to go, the Egyptians who operate the Suez Canal and their fellow workers in steel, textile and bottling factories; in hospitals, museums and schools; and those who drive buses and trains had left their jobs to protest their conditions of employment and governance. As Jim Hoagland noted in The Post, Egypt was barreling down the path that Poland, East Germany and the Philippines had taken, the path where workers join student protesters in the streets and jointly sweep away an authoritarian regime.
But even as workers were helping topple the regime in Cairo, one state government in particular was moving to topple workers' organizations here in the United States. Last Friday, Scott Walker, Wisconsin's new Republican governor, proposed taking away most collective bargaining rights of public employees. Under his legislation, which has moved so swiftly through the newly Republican state legislature that it might come to a vote Thursday, the unions representing teachers, sanitation workers, doctors and nurses at public hospitals, and a host of other public employees, would lose the right to bargain over health coverage, pensions and other benefits. (To make his proposal more politically palatable, the governor exempted from his hit list the unions representing firefighters and police.) The only thing all other public-sector workers could bargain over would be their base wages, and given the fiscal restraints plaguing the states, that's hardly anything to bargain over at all.
You might think that Walker came to this extreme measure after negotiations with public-sector unions had reached an impasse. In fact, he hasn't held such discussions. "I don't have anything to negotiate," Walker told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel last week. To underscore just how accompli he considered his fait, he vowed to call in the National Guard if protesting workers walked off the job or disrupted state services.
It's a throwback to 19th-century America, when strikes were suppressed by force of arms. Or, come to think of it, to Mubarak's Egypt or communist Poland and East Germany.
Now, it's not as if our states don't have fiscal crises to address, and Walker insists that it's Wisconsin's empty till that has driven him to curtail workers' rights. But there are other options. Democratic governors such as California's Jerry Brown and New York's Andrew Cuomo have proposed scaling back public services, pay and benefits without going after workers' fundamental rights to bargain. The right to bargain is clearly a separate question. Newly elected Republican governors, however, may reach the same conclusion Walker did and use the recession-induced fiscal crisis to achieve a partisan political objective: removing unions, the most potent force in the Democrats' electoral operation, from the landscape. "If we just stop and cure the pension problem, we have not gone far enough," Steve Malanga of the Manhattan Institute's City Journal said at the Conservative Political Action Conference last weekend.
The real goal of the American right is to reduce public employee unions to the level of private-sector unions, which now represent fewer than 7 percent of American workers. Walker's proposal not only confines public-sector unions to annual bargaining over wage increases but restricts the increases for state employees to raises in the consumer price index and compels every such union to hold an annual membership vote to determine whether the union can continue to represent workers. It clearly intends to smash these unions altogether.
Which would yield what? Our unions have already been decimated in the private sector; the results are plain. Corporate profits are soaring, while domestic investment, wages and benefits (particularly at nonunion companies) are flat-lining at best. With nobody to bargain for workers, America increasingly is an economically stagnant, plutocratic utopia. Is everybody happy?
American conservatives often profess admiration for foreign workers' bravery in protesting and undermining authoritarian regimes. Letting workers exercise their rights at home, however, threatens to undermine some of our own regimes (the Republican ones particularly), and shouldn't be permitted. Now that Wisconsin's governor has given the Guard its marching orders, we can discern a new pattern of global repressive solidarity emerging - from the chastened pharaoh of the Middle East to the cheesehead pharaoh of the Middle West.
meyersonh@washpost.com
FROM THE WASHINGTON POST PLUM LINE 17FEB11
By Greg Sargent
* Obama voices strong support for Wisconsin public employees: With the standoff continuing to rage over Governor Scott Walker's push to strip public employees of bargaining rights, Obama has now waded into the debate, denouncing Walker's proposal as an "assault on unions."
In an interview with local WTMJ-TV which is now up online, Obama said we all need to "make some adjustments to new fiscal realities," but insisted it's important not to "vilify" public employees and described them as "our neighbors, our friends":
"Some of what I've heard coming out of Wisconsin, where you're just making it harder for public employees to collectively bargain generally seems like more of an assault on unions. And I think it's very important for us to understand that public employees, they're our neighbors, they're our friends. These are folks who are teachers and they're firefighters and they're social workers and they're police officers.
"They make a lot of sacrifices and make a big contribution. And I think it's important not to vilify them or to suggest that somehow all these budget problems are due to public employees."
Obama's comments -- which put him squarely in opposition to the right's ongoing campaign to scapegoat public workers for our economic woes -- could draw more national media attention to a story that's mostly unfolded so far online.
 


Sen. Bernie Sanders: 'I've Got a Lot of Problems With the President's Budget' from THE NEWS HOUR on PBS 16FEB11

SEN BERNIE SANDERS I VT speaks out on the immorality of the Obama budget proposals on The News Hour on PBS

Judy Woodruff talks to Sen. Bernie Sanders, the longtime Vermont independent who caucuses with the Democrats and serves on the Senate Budget Committee, about the debate on spending and cuts in the president's budget blueprint for 2012.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Next, we get another perspective on the debate over U.S. spending and budgets. It comes from Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders. He's the longest serving independent member of Congress. He caucuses with the Democrats. And he serves on the Senate Budget Committee.
Welcome, Sen. Sanders.
First off, tell us what your main impressions are of the president's $3.7 trillion budget proposal for next year?
SEN. BERNIE SANDERS (I-Vt.): Well, Judy, I have got a lot of problems with the president's budget. I think it's bad.
But I think the Republican budget is a lot worse. And my job, along with other progressive members of Congress, is to help create a budget which is fair and which protects the most vulnerable people in this country at a time when the poverty rate now is higher than at any time since 1948.
JUDY WOODRUFF: So, what would you do to achieve that? What changes would you make in the budget blueprint the president sent forward?
SEN. BERNIE SANDERS: Well, that's a good question, Judy. And I think the answer is you have got to look at what's happening economically in America.
And what that's about is that our middle class is collapsing. Our median family income has gone down. Poverty is going way, way up. And the gap between the very, very rich and everybody else is going wider.
So, I think, before you look at budgets or how you deal with the deficit, you have got to take that into consideration. For example, the top 1 percent today earn more income than do the bottom 50 percent. They earn about 22 percent of every dollar earned in America. And that gap is growing wider.
Meanwhile, what this budget includes are massive tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires. So, you have a situation. The rich are getting richer. Their tax rates have gone down for many, many years. Their effective tax rate right now -- people like Warren Buffett talk about this -- at 16 percent, is lower than at any time in recent history, and yet we're giving them huge tax breaks, while poverty in America is increasing.
We have the highest rate of childhood poverty in the industrialized world for our children, and we're cutting programs for those people. So, the first thing we have to deal with is revenue. And, as a nation, we have got to say, sorry, the rich are getting richer. They're doing really well. Our friends on Wall Street, we shouldn't have to worry about. They get huge amounts of compensation.
We cannot continue to give huge tax breaks to the wealthy, cut back on programs for the vulnerable. So, that's the first issue I think we have to deal with.
JUDY WOODRUFF: Well, the president has talked about corporate -- corporate tax reform. And he said, in two years, in -- for 2012, he's going to propose letting all those tax cuts expire that were allowed to continue in December.
You spent, what, eight-and-a-half-hours on the floor of the Senate in December in a -- in a protest against that. Are you confident the president is going to let the tax cuts expire?
SEN. BERNIE SANDERS: No, of course I'm not. I mean, that's what the president said when he ran for president. And yet, when the Republicans stood up to him and said, we want to give more tax breaks, extend the Bush tax breaks, essentially, the president gave in.
When the Republicans said that, we want to lower the estate tax, Judy, which appeals -- which only applies to the top three-tenths of 1 percent -- these are not rich folks -- these the very richest people in America -- the president gave into that.
So, the president may tell us that he has this in mind, but I think the record is that he has not fought for those principles. The American people want him to fight for those principles.
And I think what this whole budget debate is about is do we stand up and say, no, we're not going to cut programs for those who need it?
The other issue that I think we have to talk about is, in the president's budget, he talks about Social Security. And he makes me a little bit nervous, because I think, as many of our listeners know, the Social Security trust fund today has a $2.6 trillion surplus.
Social Security can pay out every benefit owed to every eligible American for the next 27 years. Social Security, because it is funded by the payroll tax, hasn't contributed one nickel to the deficit.
JUDY WOODRUFF: Well, let me just interrupt you and point out, as you know very well, Republicans are criticizing the president for not tackling Social Security. In fact, some Democrats are saying he didn't embrace what his own fiscal reduction -- deficit reduction commission recommended.
SEN. BERNIE SANDERS: But that fiscal -- that's correct. But that reduction commission was made up of a conservative Democrat and a right-wing Republican.
Of course the Republicans have long wanted to privatize Social Security and destroy it. But Social Security has been the most important and valuable social program in the history of the United States. For 75 years, it's worked perfectly. It can pay out every nickel for the next 27 years, at which time it pays out 78 percent.
JUDY WOODRUFF: But it's not tackled in this budget.
SEN. BERNIE SANDERS: Well, it's mentioned. You're right. It's not tackled, but it's mentioned.
And, in my view, when you have 16 percent of our people who are unemployed or underemployed, that's an issue that we have got to deal with, not worry so much about a program which can pay out every nickel for the next 27 years.
JUDY WOODRUFF: I know one thing you're concerned about, Senator, is the president's cuts in the low-income families' home heating assistance.
The president was asked about that at his news conference yesterday, and he said -- he talked about the price of heating, of energy going down that makes it more possible to do this. But he went on to say, "Yes, I'm frustrated." He knows people are struggling, but he said -- and I'm going to quote -- he said: "My job is to make sure we're focused on the long term. And the most important thing I can do as president is make sure we're living within our means, getting a budget that's sustainable, investing in the future."
SEN. BERNIE SANDERS: Well, first of all, if the president thinks the price of oil is going down, I invite him to come to the state of Vermont. Heating oil is going up. Of course, the price of gasoline at the pump is going up.
If the president is concerned -- concerned about the long-term sustainability of our budget, then he should not have caved into the Republicans and provided huge tax breaks to millionaires and billionaires.
What I get a little bit frustrated about is, we're giving money away to people who don't need it, and then we're really tough on students who are trying to get by on Pell Grants. You got the Community Service Block Grant. You know what that is? That is the infrastructure by which we protect low-income people all over America. The president has proposed a 50 percent cut in that.
So, I think what the American people understand is that, when we have such an unequal distribution of income right now, you don't give more to the people who don't need it and cut back on people who are hurting.
JUDY WOODRUFF: Senator, what about all those voices on the Republican side, and including in the Democratic Party, who are saying, all of you in government right now need to be worried about the debt about...
SEN. BERNIE SANDERS: Yes.
JUDY WOODRUFF: ... the fact that within -- we're already borrowing so much more than the country can afford...
SEN. BERNIE SANDERS: Right. No, I...
JUDY WOODRUFF: ... and -- and so tough decisions have to be made about spending?
SEN. BERNIE SANDERS: Absolutely, Judy. You're absolutely right. And the deficit is a very serious problem. Please, do not mishear me to suggest that it is not.
The deficit primarily has been caused by two wars unfunded, huge tax breaks to people who don't need it, an insurance-company-written Medicare Part D prescription drug program, and the bailout of Wall Street.
The cause of it is not hungry children in this country or people who are sleeping out on the street. So, we have got to deal with the deficit, but you do it in a fair and progressive way. For example, this year alone, we're losing a hundred billion dollars in revenue because corporations, the wealthy, are stashing their money in tax havens in the Cayman Islands.
This year, ExxonMobil, the most profitable corporation in the history of the world, is not paying a nickel in federal income taxes, despite having made $19 billion last year. In 2005, one-quarter of corporation -- large corporations in America making a trillion in revenue didn't pay a nickel in taxes. You have got a military budget which in many ways is still fighting the old Cold War.
So, I believe that we have to move toward significant deficit reduction, but you don't do it on the backs of the middle class and working families who are already suffering as a result of this Wall Street-caused recession.
You want to know the way to raise money? Put a transaction fee on Wall Street, so maybe we can curb some of the speculation and raise some money.
JUDY WOODRUFF: Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, we hear you. And we're going to leave it there.
Thank you very much for talking with us.
SEN. BERNIE SANDERS: Thank you.

10 December 2010

What Does God Think of Economic Equality? from SOJO 6DEZ10

THE only disagreement I have with this article is the statement that early Christians practiced an early form of socialism.....ACTUALLY they were practicing Christianity, socialism is the humanist adaptation of Christian principles and teachings.
In American evangelical circles, there’s an idea that goes something like this: progressive taxation = socialism, and socialism = satanic. Never mind the fact that both Thomas Jefferson and Adam Smith (the founder of modern capitalism) favored progressive taxation, I’m wondering where we got the idea that political structures aiming for economic equality — or at least some semblance of economic equality — are a bad thing?
One of the reasons that many evangelicals believe the apostles never attacked the institution of slavery directly is because they wanted slavery to lose its grip in the community of the church first so that society would eventually follow suit. Might the same principle also apply to economic equality? We know that early Christians in the book of Acts practiced a form of voluntary socialism, but how much have we pondered what the apostle Paul says in 2 Corinthians 8:13-14?
“Our desire is not that others might be relieved while you are hard pressed, but that there might be equality. At the present time your plenty will supply what they need, so that in turn their plenty will supply what you need. The goal is equality … ” (italics emphasis mine)
I think it’s a devastating indictment on the way things are today that we don’t even aim for this in our churches — but I digress. Here’s my question: If God’s vision for the body of Christ is economic equality, then what does that say about God’s vision for society at large?
Think about it.

portrait-aaron-taylorAaron D. Taylor is the author of Alone with A Jihadist: A Biblical Response to Holy War. To learn more about Aaron’s ministry, go to www.aarondtaylor.com. To follow Aaron on Twitter, go to www.twitter.com/aarondtaylor. Aaron can be contacted at fromdeathtolife@gmail.com. If you would like the contact information of the aid worker that wrote this report, please contact Aaron Taylor at fromdeathtolife@gmail.com