NORTON META TAG

Showing posts with label Target. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Target. Show all posts

12 February 2019

TARGET, END YOUR HYPOCRISY AND STOP HURTING NEW MOMS 12FEB19

Tell Target Corp: Do better by your employees
I like shopping at Target, or I did until I found out they are just like almost every other company in America, greedy liars and hypocrites. So I am prepared to spend my money somewhere else until Target ends it's policy of cutting employees hours to make them ineligible for paid family leave. Please click the link to sign the Ultraviolet petition to Target to restore paid family leave to their hourly employees and take the time to add a message to Target, here is mine
'I will make my family and friends aware of Target's hypocrisy and will spend my hard earned dollars elsewhere until Target restores paid family leave to it's employees.' 
I also went to Target's facebook page and posted this entire blog post
Target Corporation, one of the biggest employers in the country, is swindling its workers out of paid family leave.
Hourly Target workers across the country--nearly everyone who works at an actual store--are speaking out about a widespread corporate practice of managers slashing hours so employees won't qualify for the company's paid family leave program. This impacts workers like Callie Leamy, a Target employee in Maryland who is 9 months pregnant, will likely get no paid maternity leave after giving birth, and is facing homelessness as a result.1
Target is aware that it has attracted its customers based on its "progressive" reputation. So if Target customers and the public raise an uproar about its scheme to swindle working parents out of family leave, we could force Target to live up to its reputation and actually guarantee ALL employees paid family leave.
Tell Target Corporation: "Stop cheating your workers. Offer 12 weeks of paid family leave to ALL employees, including hourly employees who need it the most."
Sign the petition
Target amassed $71 billion in revenue last year, in part because of its public image as a one-stop shop for families needs.2 And who are the people moving that money into Target executives' and shareholders' pockets? Rank and file Target workers who have families of their own. They deserve the ability to care for a new child.
With all the attention on Target and its reputation for "doing right by America,"3 we can force Target to do right by its hundreds of thousands of workers all over the country--and make a huge splash in the corporate world by demonstrating how "good" companies treat its workers.
And it's important for women that this growing movement for paid parental leave trends in the right direction: in the United States, 60% of women are the primary caregiver responsible for a family member--inadequate access to paid parental leave sets entire families back financially. In fact, over 80% of Black families, 60% of Native families, 50% of Latino families, and 40% of white families depend on the mother as the main breadwinner.4 That means access to better parental leave is essential to reaching economic equality across race lines.
Target is the perfect company to uphold as an example of an employer that values its workers fairly--but only once caring customers successfully push it to treat its workers better, and equally, with 12 weeks of paid family leave.
Thanks for speaking out!
-- Shaunna, Kat, Karin, Holly, Kathy, Susan, Anathea, Audine, Emma, Pilar, Natalie, Melody, Pam, Lindsay, Ryan, Sonja, and Noma, the UltraViolet team

Sources:
PL+US 2018 Employ Scorecard, Paid Leave in the United States, accessed: February 12, 2019
2. Target, Fortune 500, accessed February 12, 2019
3. Just 100: Companies Doing Right By America, Forbes, December 10, 2018
4. Breadwinner Mothers by Race/Ethnicity and State, Institute for Women's Policy Research, September 2016


Want to support our work? UltraViolet is funded by members like you, and our tiny staff ensures small contributions go a long way. Chip in here.

28 April 2016

DEMOCRACY NOW DAILY DIGEST 28APR16; Noam Chomsky: Young Bernie Sanders Supporters are a "Mobilized Force That Could Change the Country"



Democracy Now! Daily Digest

A Daily Independent Global News Hour with Amy Goodman & Juan González

Thursday, April 28, 2016

Stories


During an event Tuesday at the Brooklyn Public Library, Noam Chomsky, the world-renowned political dissident, linguist, author and professor, was asked about Bernie ... Read More →

As the White House is backing calls for Greece to continue to implement widespread austerity measures, we spend the hour with former Greek Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis. ... Read More →

We speak with former Greek Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis about the refugee crisis in Europe, and so-called hot spots that are registration centers for refugees in his ... Read More →

We continue our conversation with former Greek Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis as the White House is backing calls for Greece to continue to implement widespread ... Read More →

The International Monetary Fund is demanding additional austerity measures from Greece if it does not hit its budget targets. It's the latest impasse in years of fierce political ... Read More →

Headlines →

12 July 2014

Target Officially Rejects Assault Weapons in Its Stores 2JUL14

I would refer to these radical open carry activist as mongoloids but that isn't fair to those who really are mongoloids. So I will continue to refer to them as SFBOSP (Sexually Frustrated Because Of Small Penises), a category covering these boys and girls. Congrats to Target for having the courage to stand up to the stupidity and ignorance of these open carry fools in Texas, but why just assault weapons? From +Mother Jones .....

The retailer is the latest corporation to tell open-carry activists to keep their guns off the premises.

| Wed Jul. 2, 2014 10:30 AM EDT

A month after images first surfaced of pro-gun activists flaunting semiautomatic rifles at Target stores, the retailer has become the latest US company to officially reject firearms in its outlets.
"Our approach has always been to follow local laws, and of course, we will continue to do so," Target said in a statement Wednesday. "But starting today we will also respectfully request that guests not bring firearms to Target—even in communities where it is permitted by law."
The move follows weeks of pressure from Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, which used social media, online petitions, and protests at Target stores to call for such a change.
Still reeling from its disastrous failure to secure customers' personal data, Target leaders "were really nervous" after the gun issue emerged, a person with direct knowledge of the company's discussions about it told me. "This was the last thing they needed." Still, the company endured weeks of negative attention on the issue, even as Texas authorities and one of Target's corporate strategic partners made clear that Target was trying to stop the guns from coming in.
Target joins a growing list of corporations—including Starbucks, Jack in the Box, Chipotle, Sonic, and Chili's—that have reacted to demonstrations by open-carry activists by announcing that they don't want people carrying guns on their premises.
Whether open-carry activists will comply with Target's request appears to be an open question. One of the first to comment on Target's posted statement was Kory Watkins—a leader of a Texas open-carry group that's conducted provocative demonstrations, used disturbing intimidation tactics against women, and harassed a Marine veteran—who said he plans to pack heat at Target "today and tomorrow and whatever days I want."
Carrying rifles on display in public is legal in Texas, although regulations governing Target's sale of alcoholic beverages forbid guns on their premises, and armed patrons who don't leave upon request could be subject to criminal trespassing charges, according to the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission.
For more of Mother Jones' award-winning reporting on guns in America, see all of our latest coverage here, and our special reports.

23 January 2014

Wonkbook: Is there an "insurer bailout" in Obamacare? & a lot more 23JAN14


The Washington Post Thursday, January 23, 2014
Ezra Klein's WONKBOOK
Welcome to Wonkbook, Ezra Klein and Evan Soltas's morning policy news primer. Send comments, criticism, or ideas to Wonkbook at Washpost dot com. To read more by Ezra and his team, go to Wonkblog.
Wonkbook's Number of the Day: 16. That's how many days Congress has to raise the debt ceiling. A new report from Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew says the U.S. will hit it on February 7.
Wonkbook's Graph of the Day: The U.S. government keeps predicting we'll drive more than we actually do.

Wonkbook's Top 5 Stories: (1) Obamacare's weak mandate; (2) look, ma, no safety net; (3) production grows, but not employment; (4) Supreme Court might regret leaving gay marriage to the states; and (5) the path to better elections.
1. Top story: The individual mandate might not be strong enough
Why Republicans are focusing on 'risk corridors.' "Conservative wonks and Republican lawmakers are coalescing around a new strategy to sabotage Obamacare by repealing a temporary piece of the law designed to hold down premiums in the event of major market disruptions. The provision -- called "risk corridors," but dubbed the "Obamacare bailout" by the law's opponents -- seeks to stabilize costs by creating a pot of money that takes in funds from insurers who enroll healthier customers and uses it to pay out insurers who enroll sicker customers. It's a safety valve that sunsets after 2016. The repeal push is clever messaging in a sense because it lets conservatives snatch the mantle of populism from liberals against wealthy insurance companies. But it comes with its share of dangers, too." Sahil Kapur in Talking Points Memo.
Explainer: What are "risk corridors"? Louise Radnofsky and Jennifer Corbett Dooren in The Wall Street Journal.
Study: Young adults lack incentive to buy Obamacare coverage. "The conservative American Action Forum (AAF) released a study on Tuesday saying that the individual mandate penalty may never be substantial enough an incentive to get young adults to buy into the ObamaCare exchanges. The study finds that after accounting for cost-sharing and subsidies in 2014, it would still be cheaper for 86 percent of young adults to forgo coverage and to pay the individual mandate instead. That percentage decreases to 71 in 2015, and 62 in 2016, as the individual mandate penalty goes up." Jonathan Easley in The Hill.
A program bigger than Covered California. "[I]t's puzzling that nearly no one fussed over another huge figure: the 680,000-plus residents who signed up for the state's Low Income Health Plan -- perhaps the biggest element of Obamacare that got the smallest share of attention...A recent report suggested that ED utilization was flat-- or even fell -- among LIHP enrollees, although more comprehensive data suggests that there was a short-lived spike. But that should be within expectations, suggested Gerald Kominski, director of UCLA's Center for Health Policy Research." Dan Diamond in California Healthline.
@ddiamond: If you report on what experts call the "most underreported story" in Obamacare, is it still underreported? Asking for a friend.
Obamacare's gap, as seen in western North Carolina. "[F]or nine out of ten of the people she talks with, she says, it seems as if there's nothing she can do. They're too poor to qualify for affordable health insurance in North Carolina, because they're in what's called "the coverage gap:" They don't earn enough to qualify for a subsidy under the health law, and they can't get Medicaid because North Carolina is one of the 23 states that decided not to expand the program under the health law. The expansion covers childless, low-income adults who previously didn't get qualify for Medicaid. "I take someone who's working poor, I ask them to come see me, and then I find out that not only are they poor, but they're too poor for me to help. It's almost as if I wished I hadn't seen them," says Buckner, who grew up in the area." Jenny Gold in Kaiser Health News.
Explainer: Thirteen charts that explain how Roe v. Wade changed abortion rights. Sarah Kliff in The Washington Post.
Target is dropping insurance for some because of Obamacare. That could be good news for workers. "A hypothetical 25-year-old Target sales floor leader, for example, who earns $15 an hour and works 29 hours per week would qualify f0r a monthly health-care subsidy of $96 if Target does not offer insurance. The worker could not access that subsidy if Target did offer coverage -- but the worker would then, of course, have access to that employer plan. Generally speaking, those who will get the best deal here are the workers with the lowest salaries because, for the first time, their premium will be directly tethered to the amount of money they earn." Sarah Kliff in The Washington Post.
FEYMAN: Why risk corridors don't give bailouts. "[P]erhaps the most important point here is this: any conservative reform plan for universal coverage will have to use similar methods of risk adjustment. The point here is simple - if you want insurers to participate more broadly in the individual market, you'll need to offer a carrot to offset the unavoidable uncertainties. And railing against risk corridors now will make them a hard sell further down the road. Risk adjustment mechanisms get you the buy-in of insurers, but they also helps keep premiums at manageable levels while insurers develop enough experience to properly price plans on their own. This helps encourage people to enroll in these plans, which in turn helps insurers develop the necessary pricing experience - resulting in a virtuous cycle." Yevgeniy Feyman in Forbes.
@daveweigel: This is Rubio's chance to demand the end of the Obamacare risk corridors in any debt limit deal. #giggity
PONNURU: Do conservatives want to bail out Obamacare? "If conservatives wanted to make the premiums on the exchanges as low as possible, they would be for toughening the individual mandate to get more healthy people to join the pool. They're against that idea, because they don't think shoring up Obamacare is worth the conscription of more social resources. They should follow that logic in this case, too. " Ramesh Ponnuru in Bloomberg.
Music recommendations interlude: Ornette, "Crazy," remix, 2011.

Top opinion
KLEIN: Pining for LBJ, we got Christie. "Christie has been a beneficiary of LBJ nostalgia. He's a tough Republican governor in a blue state facing a Democratic legislature. He yells at people who oppose him. He swaggers across the national stage...We like our elected leaders to be stronger than the formal powers we give them. So they are tempted to exert power through informal means that we don't always approve of when they're exposed. The alternative is a disappointed electorate -- and more LBJ nostalgia." Ezra Klein in Bloomberg.
YGLESIAS: Can America afford innovation? "To many conservatives, recent attention paid to income inequality is at best a distraction from the real challenge of growth and innovation. But in reality these issues are inextricably linked. The development of new and better kinds of products is key to producing long-term economic growth. But determining what kind of products to develop and bring to market hinges crucially on whether or not people will be able to buy them...Innovative product ideas languish in semi-obscurity or simply can't get financing because in general we don't have the kind of broadly rising incomes that would support new products." Matthew Yglesias in Slate.
BEUTLER: The right is a bunch of aging white radicals. "When it became clear about a year ago that Republican leaders would have a much harder time advancing immigration reform than they realized -- that GOP activists and conservatives were livid about the idea that Republicans were going to help illegal immigrants gain citizenship -- it started to look like the party had an insoluble problem on its hands. Watching Republicans attempt to broaden their appeal to growing, traditionally Democratic constituencies has been like watching someone try to cover a bedroom floor with a poorly cut carpet, fastening it into one corner but pulling it out of the others in the process." Brian Beutler in Salon.
CHAIT: I have seen the future of the Republican Party, and it is George W. Bush. "If and when Republicans regain the White House, profligacy holds the key to their ideological salvation. Liberating themselves from austerity will allow them to back away from their brutal campaign of confiscating food stamps, Pell grants, and low-income tax credits, and still hand out tax cuts for the 1 percent. Tax cuts for one and all! That, after all, was the Bush formula: small elements of programmatic reform for low-income workers, stapled onto the agenda of The Wall Street Journal editorial page, all costs deferred." Jonathan Chait in New York Magazine.
KRISTOF: Modern family matters. "First is to expand family planning so that teenagers and young adults don't have babies they don't want and are ill-prepared to care for. Four out of five teenage pregnancies are unintended, according to the Guttmacher Institute. It's promising that a randomized trial found that the Carrera pregnancy prevention curriculum in low-income schools reduced teen births by half. Family-planning initiatives save taxpayer money now spent on health care and the safety net, yet, after inflation, America's investment in Title X family planning has fallen some 70 percent since 1980. That's crazy." Nicholas "D." Kristof in The New York Times.
MULLIGAN: Why we should pay jurors more. "Many people summoned for jury duty search desperately for excuses. Their efforts increase the burden on the court system, which has to summon and process a large number of people in order to empanel its juries. The court system might alleviate these problems by following the example of the modern military: recruit people for service by paying them far more than minimum wage...Taking property and drafting citizens into government service without market compensation have many of the same economic problems: they fail to spread the burden of supporting government activity, they encourage socially wasteful avoidance behaviors, and enforcement runs the risk of special treatment for the politically connected." Casey B. Mulligan in The New York Times.
Mother Earth interlude: A meteor crater in India.

2. Look, ma, no safety net!
States cutting weeks of aid to the jobless. "The rest of the country is now following North Carolina's lead. A federal program supplying extra weeks of benefits to the long-term unemployed expired at the end of 2013, and congressional Democrats failed in an effort to revive it. About 1.3 million jobless workers received their last payment on Dec. 28. Starting on Jan. 1, the maximum period of unemployment payments dropped to 26 weeks in most states, down from as much as 73 weeks. With that move, the country's safety net for jobless workers has undergone a sudden transformation, from one aimed at providing modest but sustained protection to workers weathering a tough labor market to one intended to give relatively short-term aid before spurring workers to accept a job, any job." Annie Lowrey in The New York Times.
Food banks anticipate cuts to food stamps. "Food banks across the country are making similar preparations, increasing efforts to prepare for the increased demand even as donations decline. Moreover, they say, they do not have enough staff to meet all the requests..."We are going to increase our efforts to get more donations and try to serve as many people as possible, given our resources," said Nancy E. Roman, executive director at the food bank. "But make no mistake, if the food stamp program is cut, we're going to see much longer lines of people seeking help with their food budgets, and we can't help them all."" Ron Nixon in The New York Times.
Explainer: 10 startling facts about global wealth inequality. Ezra Klein in The Washington Post.
Must-read debate: The American Prospect is opening a conversation on the "future of the social safety net." Kit Rachlis in The American Prospect.
Visit with pope in Rome will give Obama a chance to spotlight economic inequality. "A decision to visit Pope Francis at the Vatican in late March provides President Obama with an opportunity to highlight the problem of economic inequality, an issue he has placed at the forefront of his second-term agenda. Administration officials announced the trip Tuesday, saying Obama will travel to Rome after a pair of summits in Belgium and the Netherlands...A trip to the Vatican gives the president a chance to frame one of his signature domestic issues in largely moral terms. But the journey also highlights the continuing disagreements between the Obama administration and the Catholic Church over issues such as abortion rights and same-sex marriage." Juliet Eilperin in The Washington Post.
Tumblrs interlude: Awesome people hanging out together.

3. Production without employment
Why hiring lags even as factories hum. "Companies large and small have balked at hiring and expanding since the financial crisis, fearing the halting recovery would falter. The U.S. added just 74,000 jobs in December, according to the Labor Department, far fewer than economists had expected. Other indicators suggest executives have become more optimistic in recent months. A Business Roundtable survey of CEOs in December showed 39% expected to boost capital spending over the next six months, up from 27% in the third quarter, though hiring expectations were little changed. Much depends on whether that optimism translates into action, and whether companies choose approaches that keep a lid on hiring." Theo Francis in The Wall Street Journal.
Guess who's driving consumer spending? "Morgan Stanley drilled down into more than 100 categories of consumer spending and found the strongest growth in durable goods (products designed to last at least three years), particularly luxury goods...The findings reflect a two-track recovery for the U.S. economy. The wealthy, buoyed by stock market gains and rising real estate prices, were willing and able consumers last year. Households relying on income from wages and salaries were hit harder by higher taxes at the start of the year, tamping down demand." Jeffrey Sparshott in The Wall Street Journal.
Lew sends Congress yet another warning about the debt limit. "Treasury Secretary Jacob J. Lew warned Congress on Wednesday that the government would most likely exhaust its ability to borrow in late February, setting up yet another fiscal showdown with Republicans, and this time earlier than congressional leaders had anticipated. In a letter to Speaker John A. Boehner and the other top three congressional leaders, Mr. Lew said a surge of February spending, mainly tax refunds for 2013, would leave the Treasury with little room to maneuver after the official debt limit is reached on Feb. 7." Jonathan Weisman in The New York Times.
American oil demand rebounds. "In November the US government's Energy Information Administration began publishing weekly data that suggested US oil consumption was running 4-5 per cent higher than a year ago. For some products such as propane and propylene, which are used in petrochemical plants and agriculture, growth was in the double digits...For a country where oil demand was thought to be in structural decline, as car engines have become more efficient and heavy industries move offshore, the numbers were startling - so startling they were widely dismissed. But as more reliable monthly data has followed, some observers believe something big is stirring in the oil market." Ajay Makan and Gregory Meyer in The Financial Times.
Crude exports face obstacles. "That there is even a debate on easing or ending the 40-year-old near-total ban on U.S. crude-oil exports is a remarkable turnabout for the U.S.'s energy situation, where dependence on foreign oil has been a key driver of policies in several presidential administrations. The resolution of the debate carries important implications on the profit potential of exporters and the ability to avoid a production glut that could slow the shale boom...The IEA said Tuesday that surging U.S. production could hit a wall if the export ban stays in place, making additional production less economically attractive. The growing volumes "that cannot leave North America are increasingly posing a challenge to industry," the report said." Alicia Mundy and Ben Lefebvre in The Wall Street Journal.
More Tumblrs interlude: Distractions in space.
4. The Supreme Court is going to have to straighten this mess out
Same-sex newlyweds sue Utah. "The legal saga in Utah over same-sex marriage grew even more complicated on Tuesday as four couples who had married during the brief window they could do so sued the state over its recent decision not to recognize their marriages or provide any new state benefits to same-sex newlyweds. The American Civil Liberties Union of Utah, which filed the lawsuit on their behalf, said that Utah's decision had thrown hundreds of new marriages into uncertainty, depriving gay couples of the ability to obtain health care coverage as spouses, to adopt children together legally or to make medical decisions if a spouse or family member were to fall ill." Jack Healy in The New York Times.
...And Florida. "Six same-sex couples in Florida have filed a lawsuit challenging the state's ban on gay marriage on grounds that it violates fundamental guarantees of the US Constitution, including a right to marry regardless of sexual orientation...The 21-page complaint seeks to overturn two Florida laws, passed in 1977 and 1997, limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples. It also seeks to invalidate a 2008 amendment to the Florida constitution defining marriage as "the legal union of only one man and one woman as husband and wife."" Warren Richey in the Christian Science Monitor.
Meanwhile, Indiana moves one step in the other direction. "A hotly debated proposal to add a gay marriage ban to Indiana's constitution passed its first hurdle of the 2014 legislative session Wednesday when a House committee voted in favor of the measure. A panel of 13 lawmakers on the House Elections and Apportionment Committee voted 9-3 along party lines to send the amendment, known as House Joint Resolution 3, to the full House. The vote came after about four hours of passionate testimony." Barb Berggoetz and Tony Cook in The Indianapolis Star.
Transgender students in California get new options. "School districts in California are grappling with a newly enacted, first-of-its-kind law that spells out rights for those students who don't identify as being the gender of their birth. California law AB 1266, the first such statewide legislation in the country, grants students who identify themselves as transgender the right to choose the sports teams and extracurricular activities--as well as the bathrooms and locker rooms--that correspond to their gender identities." Alejandro Lazo in The Wall Street Journal.
Fantasy economics interlude: This is the Wonkblog equivalent of your football roster.
5. The path to better elections
Bipartisan election commission releases list of suggested fixes. "Concluding a six-month review, the Presidential Commission on Election Administration said in its report that jurisdictions should expand online voter registration and early balloting, update electronic voting equipment as first-generation voting machines grow obsolete, and share voter registration records across state lines to protect against fraud. The 112-page report also suggests improvements in the more traditional ways Americans have cast ballots. Those include increasing the number of schools used as polling places, simplifying voting for members of the military and other Americans living overseas through better access to state Web sites and insuring that polling places are close to voters' homes." Scott Wilson in The Washington Post.
Literary interlude: Zelda Fitzgerald wrote. Who knew?
Wonkblog Roundup
Miami Beach mayor: Take your tech start-up gospel, and shove it. Lydia DePillis.
10 startling facts about global wealth inequality. Ezra Klein.
Target is dropping insurance for some because of Obamacare. That could be good news for workers. Sarah Kliff.
The U.S. government keeps predicting we'll drive more than we actually do. Brad Plumer.
Thirteen charts that explain how Roe v. Wade changed abortion rights. Sarah Kliff.
Et Cetera
Snowden denies that he was a spy for Russia. Charlie Savage in The New York Times.
Got tips, additions, or comments? E-mail us.
Wonkbook is produced with help from Michelle Williams.

05 December 2013

12 Fast Facts About Thursday's Fast-Food Strike & The 10 Companies Paying Americans The Least: 24/7 Wall Street 5DEZ&16NOV13

WORKERS at national chain fast food restaurants across the country are going on strike today, 5 DEC 13, for higher wages. Most of these employees are underpaid, underemployed adults who make so little they qualify for SNAP (food stamps), government health care and other social safety net programs. So when you go to mcdonalds, burger king, taco bell, kfc, starbucks, panera, sonic, dunkin donuts, and the like not only are you paying too much for food that isn't good for you, you are subsidizing the substandard pay of the employees with your tax dollars and the lavish lifestyles of the executives who run these companies. Check out these facts about today's strike and how these companies are screwing their employees and the American taxpayers. From HuffPost....
This Thursday, December 5, workers at fast-food restaurants around the country will be striking for higher pay and better working conditions. Their primary demand is an increase in their base hourly wages to $15 an hour.
Here are 12 things you should know about Thursday's action.
1. If wages had kept pace with productivity gains, the minimum wage would be over $16 an hour.
Corporate profits have soared. Workers are producing more, but they're not sharing in the rewards.
Productivity and the minimum wage generally increased at the same rate from 1947 to 1969, during this country's postwar boom years. Using a conservative benchmark, economists Dean Baker and Will Kimball determined that the minimum wage would be $16.54 today if it had continued to keep pace with productivity.
The strikers are asking for $15 an hour.
(Source: Baker and Kimball, Center for Economic and Policy Research)
2. The average fast food worker makes $8.69 an hour.
Many jobs pay at or near the minimum wage, which is $7.25 per hour. And an estimated 87 percent of fast food workers receive no health benefits.
(Source: UC Berkeley Labor Center)
3. The CEO of McDonald's Corporation makes $13.8 million per year.
That's a 237 percent pay increase over last year, when he was paid a "mere" $4.1 million. Presumably health benefits are also included.
(Source: USA Today)
4. McDonald's cost the American taxpayer an estimated $1.2 billion in public assistance per year.
In other words, taxpayer money is subsidizing this large corporation's profits - at the expense of American workers.
(Source: National Employment Law Project)
5. McDonald's made $1.5 billion in profits last quarter.
That's up 5 percent from the previous year.
(Source: McDonald's Corporation)
6. The 10 largest fast food companies cost taxpayers an estimated $3.9 billion in government health assistance and $1.04 billion in food assistance.
Republicans are demanding cuts to government health and food programs. With all the talk of deficit reduction, it's surprising that no one has pointed out that a great way to lower expenditures would be by ending these backdoor subsidies for highly profitable corporations.
(Source: UC Berkeley Labor Center)
7. These 10 companies earned $7.4 billion in profits last year.
They also paid out $7.7 billion in dividends. Meanwhile ...
(Source: National Employment Law Project)
8. Fast food workers are more than twice as likely to be on public assistance.
25 percent of American workers receive some form of public assistance - which is a disturbing figure itself. For fast food workers that figure was 52 percent.
And it's not just part-time work that's causing the problem.  More than half of full-time fast food workers receive some form of public assistance.
(Sources: University of California, Berkeley/University of Illinois study; UC Berkeley Labor Center)
9. Most of the workers who would be affected by this wage change are adults.
We also hear that it's not necessary to raise the minimum wage, especially for fast food workers, because most of them are "kids" working a few hours each week for pocket money. Think of this as the "malt shoppe" argument.
But it's not true. Most low-wage workers are adults. Nationally, adults make up 88 percent of the workers who would receive a raise if the minimum wage were increased to $10.10 per hour. In locales as distinct as New York State and Albuquerque, New Mexico, that figure rises to 92 percent.
(Sources: US Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, Fiscal Policy Institute, New Mexico Voices for Children/Fiscal Policy Project)
10. Over 7 million children live in minimum-wage households.
And many of these workers are parents. Seven million children - nearly  one American child in ten - feels the effects of low wages.
(Source: data from the National Women's Law Center)
11. This strike is targeting large employers.
66 percent of low-wage workers are employed by organizations with 100 employees or more. Thursday's strikers aren't targeting mom-and-pop operations. They're striking against some of America's largest corporations.
How large? McDonald's employs 707,850 people. Yum! Brands (better known as Pizza Hut, Taco Bell, and KFC) employs 379,449 people. Altogether these 10 companies employ 2,251,956 people.
The workforce for these ten companies is greater than the populations of Nebraska, West Virginia, Idaho, Hawaii, Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Montana, Delaware, South Dakota,  Alaska, North Dakota, Vermont, and Wyoming, states which hold 28 seats in the United States Senate.  Shouldn't these fast-food workers have a voice of some kind too?
(Sources: National Employment Law Project, US Census Bureau)
12. There's probably a rally near you.
There's an easy-to-use website to help you find one. There's also an online workers' strike kit, for fast food workers who want to take action.
(Source: Low Pay Is Not OK)


Follow Richard (RJ) Eskow on Twitter: www.twitter.com/rjeskow 

The 10 Companies Paying Americans The Least: 24/7 Wall Street 16NOV13

AMERICAN corporate greed is keeping American workers in poverty. Paying higher wages and providing employee benefits doesn't have to increase prices for goods and services, the corporation could cut the immoral and obscene pay and benefits for their ceos and executive boards. And there is a secondary benefit for consumers if these companies pay their employees a living wage and provide benefits. Doing so will eliminate the need for these people to receive social safety net benefits, the corporate welfare these companies receive, paid for by all of us. Think about that the next time you go shopping or out to lunch. I don't patronize any of the restaurant chains listed below because I think their food is gross and overpriced. I don't shop at marshalls or tj maxx or home goods. I haven't shopped at walmart since 1989. And until their company policy changes I will not be shopping at sears, target or starbucks. For more see my earlier post How McDonald's & Walmart Became Welfare Queens & Audio of McResource "Help Line" 13NOV13 http://bucknacktssordidtawdryblog.blogspot.com/2013/11/how-mcdonalds-and-walmart-became.html
This from 24/7 Wall Street & HuffPost...
24/7 Wall Street: This summer, thousands of fast-food workers in the United States went on strike in cities across the country, demanding their wages be increased to $15 an hour and the ability to unionize. To no one’s surprise, they didn’t get it. As of 2012, an estimated 4.7% of hourly workers are paid at or below the federal minimum wage of $7.25 an hour. According to several groups, low- and minimum-wage workers are growing faster than any other group of earners.
Meanwhile, profits at many of the corporations that employ the most minimum-wage workers have risen. McDonald’s, Walmart and Target together employ several million Americans. While these companies’ profits have grown in recent years, most of their workers continue to earn low or minimum wages. 24/7 Wall St. identified the 10 companies that employ the most low- and minimum wage workers.
Companies that pay employees poorly fall into one of three industries: retailers such as Walmart and Sears, restaurant chains such as McDonald’s and Yum! Brands, and grocery stores such as Kroger. These industries are customer-facing and rely on a fleet low- and minimum-wage workers to take orders, stock clothing and goods and wait tables. “The service sector across the board — the retail and restaurant industries — those are the core of the low-wage labor market,” explained Jack Temple, policy analyst at the National Employment Law Project (NELP).
To reinforce the argument that the low wages these companies are paying are unfair, Temple points to the large compensations most of the chief executive officers at these companies receive. CEOs at nine of these 10 companies are paid more than $10 million annually, while Michael Duke and Howard Schultz, CEOs of Walmart and Starbucks, each receive more than $20 million per year.
Perhaps a fairer measure that may indicate whether a company can afford to increase its employees’ wages is the profitability of these companies. Net income in all but one of these companies has increased over the past five fiscal years. Kroger’s net income more than tripled since fiscal year 2008 to nearly $1.4 billion. Sears’ net income, on the other hand, has declined significantly during that time. The company recorded a net loss of $930 million this year.
Temple explained: “Low-wage companies have choices. They can continue making a lot of profits, and can continue paying their CEOs an incredible amount of money by paying low wages to their employees. But they have the resources to operate profitably and pay high wages as well.”
Based on the methodology used by the National Employment Law Project in its 2012 report “Big Business, Corporate Profits, and the Minimum Wage,” 24/7 Wall St. identified the 10 companies in industries that are primarily low-wage employers. Based on annual reports and proxy filings, we also reviewed the total size of the companies’ workforces, the recent performance of the corporations in terms of revenue and profit, and the highest executive pay at these companies. Included in our analysis were total U.S. employee figures, which we estimated when the figures were not provided by the company. In keeping with the NELP methodology, all employee figures represent system wide employment, including employees of franchisees. To avoid double-counting low-wage workers, Starbucks is an exception, as many other low-wage employers are Starbucks licensees.

Ten Companies Paying Americans the Least

10. Starbucks
> U.S. workforce: 120,000
> CEO compensation: $28.9 million
> Revenue: $13.3 billion
> Net income: $1.4 billion
> No. of U.S. stores: 7,049
Starbucks Corp. (NASDAQ: SBUX) employs 120,000 workers across the United States. Howard Schultz, the company’s CEO, has become a billionaire by turning Starbucks from a small coffee retailer into one of the world’s most famous brands. Last year, Schultz took home nearly $29 million in total compensation. Schultz is often viewed as a progressive executive, due to his support of gay marriage and his request that customers not bring guns into Starbucks locations. In an interview with CNBC in March, Schultz cautiously supported a minimum wage hike. However, according to Glassdoor.com, baristas at Starbucks are paid an average of less than $9 an hour. Schultz has downplayed the relevance of these figures.
9. TJX Companies
> U.S. workforce: 138,211 (est.)
> CEO compensation: $21.8 million
> Revenue: $25.9 billion
> Net income: $1.9 billion
> No. of U.S. stores: 2,355
The TJX Companies Inc. (NYSE: TJX) operates Marshalls, TJ Maxx and HomeGoods in the United States. The company’s stores are off-price retailers, meaning they buy unsold inventory from manufacturers and other retailers and resell it at a discount. TJX’s sales have grown in the past four consecutive fiscal years as the retailer also boosted its operating profit margin. Despite the company’s success, sales associates at its stores earn less than $8 an hour on average, according to Glassdoor.com.
ALSO READ: Cities with the Widest Gap Between the Rich and the Poor
8. Macy’s 
> U.S. workforce: 175,700
> CEO compensation: $13.8 million
> Revenue: $27.7 billion
> Net income: $1.3 billion
> No. of U.S. stores: 844
Annual revenue at Macy’s Inc. (NYSE: M) has risen slightly over the past four years, up from roughly $25 billion in 2008 to more than $27.7 billion at the end of its latest fiscal year. Macy’s, the second-largest department store in the United States, exceeded Wall Street’s expectations this past quarter, posting large increases in sales and earnings from the year before. Earlier this year, members of the United Food and Commercial Workers Union ratified a five-year agreement with Macy’s that should help protect the benefits of nearly 700 Macy’s employees in Maryland and Washington, D.C. According to Glassdoor.com, associates are paid under $9 an hour on average.
7. Darden Restaurants
> U.S. workforce: 203,389 (est.)
> CEO compensation: $6.4 million
> Revenue: $8.6 billion
> Net income: $412 million
> No. of U.S. stores: 2,105
Revenues at Darden Restaurants Inc. (NYSE: DRI), the parent company of chains such as Olive Garden and Red Lobster, rose from just $7.2 billion in 2009 to $8.6 billion in fiscal 2013. According to Morningstar’s analysis, operating margins have been some of the best in the industry in the past few years. Additionally, instead of raising wages, the company’s funds have been used effectively “to fund growth concepts and enhance total shareholder returns.” Yet the results have not been enough for investors, some of whom have pushed for the company to split and continue to cut costs faster. In 2013, Fortune named Darden one of the “100 Best Companies to Work For,” citing access to low-cost health insurance for part-time employees. Still, pay for many workers at Olive Garden and Red Lobster is frequently less than $10.00 per hour, according to Glassdoor.com. However, many of these employees may receive tips in addition to their base pay.
ALSO READ: Eight Big Retailers Open Thanksgiving
6. Sears Holdings
> U.S. workforce: 246,000
> CEO compensation: $1.3 million (Louis D’Ambrosio, former CEO)
> Revenue: $39.9 billion
> Net income: -$930 million
> No. of U.S. stores: 2,073
Sears Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: SHLD), owner of both Sears and Kmart, is in heavy competition with other department stores. The median hourly wage for department store workers was just $9.83 in 2012. At Sears, sales associates averaged slightly more than $8 an hour, while cashiers averaged $7.70 per hour. Kmart offered similar pay to its workers as well, with 105 cashiers and 75 sales associates reporting to Glassdoor.com that their hourly wages were less than $8.00. However, Sears Holdings may not have the necessary ability to increase its employees’ pay. Sales have slipped in the past few years, plunging from $47.8 billion in fiscal 2008 to less than $40 billion in the most recent year. The company has also failed to post an operating profit in either of the past two full fiscal years.

5. Yum! Brands
> U.S. workforce: 694,712 (est.)
> CEO compensation: $14.2 million
> Revenue: $13.6 billion
> Net income: $1.6 billion
> No. of U.S. stores: 18,069
Yum! Brands Inc. (NYSE: YUM) CEO David Novak received more than $14 million worth of total compensation in the past fiscal year. The company’s revenue rose from $11.3 billion to $13.6 billion. Hourly wages for workers at its KFC, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell chains, however, are still often less than $8 an hour. Yum! Brands has continued to expand, opening more than five new restaurants a day outside the United States in 2012. However many American workers have expressed frustration that the company’s success has not led to an increase in their pay. This summer, fast-food workers at Yum! Brands and other fast-food chains staged protests across the country, demanding higher wages.
4. Kroger
> U.S. workforce: 343,000
> CEO compensation: $11.1 million
> Revenue: $96.8 billion
> Net income: $1.5 billion
> No. of U.S. stores: 2,418
The Kroger Co. (NYSE: KR) employs 343,000 workers in 2,418 stores across the country. The company operates stores under several names, including Kroger, City Market, Dillons and others. A majority of Kroger’s employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements between the company and different unions. In the past few months, Kroger has agreed to terms with unions covering thousands of workers in Virginia and Texas. Kroger’s net profit was $1.5 billion at the end of the most recent fiscal year.
ALSO READ: America’s Most Popular Stores
3. Target
> U.S. workforce: 361,000
> CEO compensation: $20.6 million
> Revenue: $73.3 billion
> Net income: $3.0 billion
> No. of U.S. stores: 1,778
Target Corp. (NYSE: TGT) had 361,000 employees working at 1,778 stores in the United States at the end of 2012. The average listed salary on Glassdoor.com for a cashier or an employee on the Target sales floor is less than $9 an hour. In response to Target opening on Thursday, in advance of Black Friday, Target workers drafted a petition last year to “save Thanksgiving.” More than 300,000 people signed the petition. This year, Target stores will open on Thanksgiving Day at 8 p.m. That is an hour earlier than last year.
2. McDonald’s
> U.S. workforce: 739,055 (est.)
> CEO compensation: $13.8 million
> Revenue: $27.6 billion
> Net income: $5.5 billion
> No. of U.S. stores: 14,157
In the restaurant industry, the hourly median wage was just over $9.00 as of 2012. However, many McDonald’s Corp. (NYSE: MCD) employees are paid far less, with cashiers and crew members often earning only the minimum wage. In October, several McDonald’s employees were arrested for protesting their wages at the Union League Club of Chicago, where McDonald’s President Jeff Stratton was giving a speech. Between 2008 and 2012, sales and profit margins at McDonald’s have increased. Despite the company’s growth, employees are still hurting. All but admitting the low wages, McDonald’s encourages employees to enroll in food stamps and welfare programs.
ALSO READ: The 10 Least Respected Companies in America
1. Walmart
> U.S. workforce: 1.4 million
> CEO compensation: $20.7 million
> Revenue: $469 billion
> Net income: $17.0 billion
> No. of U.S. stores: 4,759
There are 1.4 million Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (NYSE: WMT) associates working at the company’s 4,759 U.S. stores. Walmart recently announced it would launch Black Friday sales at 6 p.m. on Thanksgiving Day. Critics of Walmart see this as adding insult to injury — forcing retail workers who already earn low wages to cut holidays short. Criticisms like these have been part of an onslaught of claims that Walmart underpays its workers. Walmart disagrees, saying that “for tens of thousands of people every year, a job at Walmart opens the door to a better life.” According to the company, a full-time hourly wage is $12.83. Some argue that the company’s number is inflated, however, reflecting the salaries of higher-paid employees. Hourly wages for sales associates are less than $9.00, according to Glassdoor.com. Walmart’s net income rose to $17 billion last year.
Correction: In an earlier version of this article, the number of Starbucks stores in the U.S. was listed as “5,415/7,049/13,493.” In fact, there are only 7,049 company-owned stores. While there are 5,415 licensees stores and 13,493 total stores in the U.S., neither were considered for the discussion.
By Michael B. Sauter, Thomas C. Frohlich and Alexander E.M. Hess
http://247wallst.com/special-report/2013/11/15/ten-companies-paying-americans-the-least/3/


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/16/companies-pay-americans_n_4288090.html 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rj-eskow/12-fast-facts-about-thurs_b_4386095.html?utm_source=Alert-blogger&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Email%2BNotifications