NORTON META TAG

07 December 2013

Nelson Mandela, 1918-2013 from NPR 5&6DEZ13

THERE have been some great stories on NPR on the amazing life of Nelson Mandela. Here is the main page of their coverage, there are lots of links, click on them, and listen to the ones that offer that choice because there are both funny and moving and musical stories to be shared. And the Frontline show The Long Walk of Nelson Mandela is well worth watching http://video.pbs.org/video/2365135079/...

The Record

The Mandela Playlist: A Life And Legacy, Told In Music

The former South African president Nelson Mandela has lived a life filled with rich musical associations.
It's worth pausing to consider not only the legacy and achievements of former South African president Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela, but also the rich musical associations of his life.

Nelson Mandela: An Audio History

Visit Mandela: An Audio History for more on this series.
December 5, 2013 A Radio Diaries documentary offers a window into South Africa's half-century-long struggle for democracy through rare sound recordings of freedom fighter Nelson Mandela — and those who fought with and against him.

The Two-Way

Mandela Is Remembered On Social Media 

December 5, 2013 Twitter and other social media outlets see an outpouring of comments on the life and death of Nelson Mandela.

Code Switch

The First Time I Heard The Name 'Mandela' 

People gather to leave messages of support for Nelson Mandela outside his hospital in Pretoria, South Africa, earlier this year. Mandela has died at the age of 95.
December 5, 2013 The South African leader's life held special power for black Americans, who lost many iconic civil rights leaders tragically early. Karen Grigsby Bates reflects on Mandela's legacy.

06 December 2013

As millions suffer in Syria, America looks away 5DEZ13

THE plight of Syrian refugees isn't being ignored by the American public. While there have not been any big fundraising campaigns for funding NGOs providing aid to these refugees, the American public made it very clear when the Obama administration considered military intervention after assad used chemical weapons on his own people that we opposed US military involvement but supported humanitarian aid. The American people, through our government, are sending tens of millions of dollars in food, medical and shelter aid to these refugees. Yet we have seen on mainstream American media these same refugees complaining about being ignored by the West, by America, and how they need more help, and many Americans are turned off by what is seen as anti American, anti Western rhetoric. Maybe if these refugees publicly condemned the rich Muslim nations by name for failing to live up to the teachings of the Prophet regarding charity and compassion, for allowing fellow Muslims suffer for lack of food, shelter, medical care and education, maybe there would be a push from the American people for our government to provide more. We don't expect or want the Syrian refugees to beg or grovel. We just expect them to be fair in their condemnations and accusations. We want them to share the guilt, God knows there is enough to go around.

Morton Abramowitz is a senior fellow at the Century Foundation and a former U.S. ambassador to Thailand.
A mericans pride themselves on helping the distressed. They have indeed been generous when people and countries are in trouble. But our public and government have also been complacent in the face of massive human suffering. Recall Rwanda and Cambodia. More recently, the U.S. public has watched passively for well over two years the continuing destruction of a highly developed state: Syria, where more than 120,000 civilians have been killed and more than 6 million left homeless.
Nine million people need humanitarian assistance. More than 2 million Syrians are refugees in neighboring countries. More than 3 million others are now beyond the reach of humanitarian agencies, according to the United Nations. All of these numbers increase daily; hence the urgent international calls for more direct humanitarian assistance and the scrambling diplomatic activity. With no prospect of Western military aid to end the conflict and little likelihood of a negotiated solution, greater humanitarian assistance is seen as the only way of helping millions of beleaguered people for an uncertain time — an extraordinary admission of political failure.

Americans have not collectively expressed great concern or reached deep in their pockets to provide desperately needed aid, nor have humanitarian agencies aggressively pursued funds from the public. Aid has come mostly from increasing government appropriations. The absence of public clamor has made it easier for the Obama administration to stay on the sidelines of this international wreck, seek empty U.N. resolutions and get away with providing funds for humanitarian assistance without doing more to resolve the issue. The U.S. secretary of state did not even attend the most recent U.N. pledging conference to scrounge monies from stingy states. Our government does not want public clamor.
Many would argue that the anemic public response to the Syrian debacle is not surprising. It is incessantly pointed out that Americans are exhausted after two wars and that much more needs to be done at home, as the president asserts. Some always feel that Americans squander too much on others’ problems. The country is also supposedly tired of its massive continuing military involvement in Muslim countries. For many Americans, getting involved even in humanitarian efforts is something of a slippery slope to military involvement. Too often they have heard the siren song.
Yet many constituencies that would usually promote greater involvement appear to be sitting out the Syrian crisis. Evangelical churches that urged presidents to provide greater help for southern Sudanese seem uncharacteristically silent as a country full of desperate Christians sinks steadily into oblivion. Why do they not cry out to help their brethren? Many would ask whom should they support in Syria, a country beset by deepening sectarian divisions. Syrian Christians have suffered badly and feel desperate about a future in an Islamist-dominated country. Their support and security still come mostly from President Bashar al-Assad. Many U.S. churches apparently choose to remain silent in an anti-Assad world.
What about the U.S. Jewish community? Jewish advocates have been in the forefront of responses to humanitarian crises from the Balkans to Africa, where they helped generate sustained support for Bosnia and Darfur. Strong eloquent voices such as Elie Wiesel still call out the U.S. government, but many Jews seem circumspect about getting involved in Syria, where bad guys abound on each side and the Israeli security benefits from Assad’s demise are uncertain. Many are torn by the human disaster and want Assad to go, but, like other Americans, they are wary about military action, including the armed delivery of humanitarian assistance within Syria.
Humanitarian agencies have been doing extraordinary work in and around Syria, but they either have tried and failed to arouse the U.S. public, or they are averse to beating public drums for Syrian relief. Major agencies focus on the federal government when seeking funds for Syria and regional refugee relief. Few have gotten together to raise public awareness or private funds.
Even Hollywood has been mostly silent on Syria.
It is already very late. More money is needed for the displaced and those who will soon swell their numbers. Just as important, an agreement between the warring parties and their international patrons or some other approach is now required to get much greater assistance into Syria. Assad and his foreign supporters have not had to fear what an energized U.S. public might demand of its government. Ways must be found beyond bombing runs for the United States and other Western governments to save the millions of Syrians at risk as well as limit the destructive spillover for friends in the region. Those who care must rally around a common banner of pressing the U.S. government to urgently take extraordinary steps to save many more Syrians.
Read more about this topic:
Samer Attar: The Assad regime continues to block humanitarian aid for Syria
Elie Wiesel: How to stop the Syria massacre
David Ignatius: The second Syrian war
The Post’s View: Mr. Kerry’s empty words on Syria
Jackson Diehl: Foreign policy fantasies
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/americans-are-ignoring-syrias-humanitarian-crisis/2013/12/05/0d24949a-5ba0-11e3-a49b-90a0e156254b_story.html 

THE NO HOLDS BARRED WAR ON CHRISTMAS & Can A Scrappy Gang Of Republicans Save Christmas For A Million Unemployed People? 6DEZ13

THE political party that launches an annual propaganda campaign about the "war on Christmas" is guilty of waging (GASP!) war on Christmas. The unemployment rate is still 7%, tens of millions of Americans who want to work can't find jobs. We are still in a recession. But the gop / tea-baggers who claim to celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ are insisting unemployment benefits for the tens of millions of unemployed in the U.S. will not be extended. Benefits for 1.3 million of these people will end on 28DEC13 unless Congress passes an unemployment benefits extension, more will loose their benefits after the new year. Please sign this petition telling Congress to pass an unemployment extension before they go on their holiday break. 

Ever gotten a dirty look for wishing someone "Happy Holidays"?

It's the same story every year. December rolls around, and the next thing you know Bill O'Reilly and FOX News get to work raising the blood pressure of conservatives everywhere, telling tall tales of how evil liberals won't let them sing carols or display nativity sets. And every year, most of those stories turn out to be false -- not that it ever deters the talking heads from telling them.

Well, this year there is a real "War on Christmas"; and it's not being waged by the ACLU or the Democratic Party. This year, the Republicans are playing Scrooge, robbing 1.3 million people across America of desperately needed unemployment benefits right in the middle of the holiday season -- and setting the stage for robbing millions more of the same benefits later.

Yesterday, Nancy Pelosi stood up for the unemployed in a big way, saying she won't support any budget deal in the House that doesn't guarantee these crucial benefits. But Republicans refuse to extend them. Congress is scheduled to go on holiday break in just a few short days, and if they don't reach a deal benefits will be completely cut off on December 28th, sending people who are already in a tough place scrambling for income even as temporary holiday jobs disappear and more people find themselves without work.

Nothing could be more heartless -- or less in the spirit of the season. Tell Republican leaders in Congress to end their "War on Christmas" and extend unemployment benefits now.

When it comes to Christmas, Republicans talk a big game, but sometimes it's hard to tell if they understand what holidays are really about. Regardless of what you call them or how you choose to observe them, the holiday season is about family. It's about community. It's about lifting up people who are struggling and taking care of each other. And that's what makes this situation so appalling.

I know that getting Republicans in Congress to act is always a long shot, but if we can get them to move on anything, it's this. After all, at the end of the day, even the Grinch had a heart. And deep inside, Republicans know that at this time of year especially we should be showing each other compassion and care -- not taking from those who really need it.

So this holiday season, let's come together to tell Republicans enough with the Scrooge act -- end your "War on Christmas" and give millions of people the gift of financial security over the holidays.

Thank you for standing with us,
Jim
Jim Dean
Chair, Democracy for America 

WASHINGTON -- A coalition of House Republicans is preparing a letter to send to their party's leadership pleading for an extension of long-term unemployment insurance, a rare positive sign for the plan's legislative prospects.
The members are currently trying to pick up additional signatures for the letter, which may be sent to leadership either Friday or Monday, according to a House aide. A spokesman for Rep. Joe Heck (R-Nev.) told the Las Vegas Sun and confirmed to The Huffington Post that the congressman would be among those signing on. Several sources said Rep. Chris Gibson (R-N.Y.) is leading the effort, meanwhile, but Gibson's office ignored requests for comment.
At a time when Congress appears unlikely to pass an extension of federal unemployment benefits before they expire on Dec. 28, a show of support from members of the House majority could provide a bit of a boost. Still, the prospects of an extension passing seem low, meaning benefits for 1.3 million long-term jobless Americans will likely stop abruptly after Christmas.
Moments after the Labor Department announced on Friday that the economy had added 203,000 jobs in November and the unemployment rate had fallen to 7 percent -- the lowest level in five years -- House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) seemingly dismissed the need for an extension of federal benefits.
"Today’s report includes positive signs that should discourage calls for more emergency government 'stimulus,'" Boehner said.
Boehner's spokesman, Brendan Buck, would not say whether the speaker was referring to unemployment insurance specifically. Instead, Buck referred The Huffington Post to a statement Boehner made on the matter Thursday -- before the jobs numbers were announced -- in which he promised to look at a proposal if it were put forward by the president.
"I am not the expert [on the issue]," Boehner added. "Talk to the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee."
The White House has not produced a proposal, though the president's team has tried to amplify pressure on Congress by releasing state-by-state data on the impact a lapse in unemployment insurance would have. The administration also referenced the need for an extension in its response to Friday's jobs report.
House Democrats, meanwhile, put forward a budget plan that includes a $25 billion extension of unemployment insurance, a provision that would be paid for by funding IRS tax collectors to go after delinquent taxpayers.
Democrats in the House and Senate have introduced standalone legislation to reauthorize the benefits as well. But an extension is more likely to pass if it's included in the budget deal currently being negotiated in a bicameral conference committee. Those negotiations will continue to take place over the weekend, led by Senate Budget Committee Chair Patty Murray (D-Wash.) and House Budget Committee Chair Paul Ryan (R-Wis.). One congressional aide familiar with the talks said the inclusion of unemployment insurance in the final deal was "still an open item," likely to be resolved with input from the chambers' respective leaders.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/12/06/unemployment-benefits_n_4399549.html?utm_source=Alert-blogger&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Email%2BNotifications

Tell Terry McAuliffe: Turn Dirty Money Into Good Deeds 6DEZ13

terry mcauliffe D gov elect VA is a corporate Democrat, not of or for the people, he is for whoever can provide the greatest financial benefit for him and his cronies. The very same dirty energy companies that supported cuccinelli are donating tens of thousands of dollars to mcauliffe's inauguration committee to guarantee there is room for them at the corporate welfare trough. Please sign this petition to gov elect mcauliffe telling him to use this money for solar panels on the roof of the governor's mansion in Richmond and to commit to moving Virginia to clean and renewable energy.


Sign the petition ►

Governor-elect Terry McAuliffe's inauguration committee has received donations from some of the most polluting companies in the commonwealth of Virginia, including $25,000 from Alpha Natural Resources and $50,000 from Dominion Resources.
By using the donations from these companies to put solar panels on the roof of the Virginia governor's mansion, McAuliffe can show a direct and tangible commitment to a clean-energy future while lowering the carbon footprint and operating costs of Virginia's government buildings.
That's why I started my own campaign on CREDOMobilize.com, which allows activists to start their own petitions. My petition, which is to Governor-elect Terry McAuliffe, says the following:
Governor-elect McAuliffe should use funds donated to his inauguration fund by polluting firms and put them to use in creating a brighter clean-energy future for all Virginians by putting solar panels on the Virginia governor's mansion.
Sign the petition: Tell Governor-elect McAuliffe to spend dirty energy money on solar panels for the Governor's mansion.
Alpha Natural Resources and Dominion Resources donated heavily to the campaign of climate science-denier Ken Cuccinelli, seeking to foster a climate hostile to 21st-century clean-energy solutions.
Having campaigned alongside climate scientist Michael Mann and committed himself to a clean-energy future, McAuliffe should not appear to be selling access to Virginia's biggest polluters.
Governor-elect McAuliffe has expressed skepticism about solar power's potential in Virginia in the past, saying it is "much more difficult for solar here, obviously, because we don’t have the sun." But my home in northern Virginia, which gets 80% of its electricity from rooftop solar panels, shows otherwise.
Will you join me and add your name to my petition to Governor-elect McAuliffe urging him to spend contributions from dirty-energy firms to put solar panels on the Virginia governor's mansion?
Thank you for your support.
Adam Siegel
Sign the petition ►

HAS BILL O'REILLY JOINED THE WESTBORO CHURCH? Bill O'Reilly speaks on behalf of Jesus about the scourge of Food Stamps 4DEZ13

WHAT a sad perversion of the teachings of Jesus Christ. In the Beatitudes and other teachings of Jesus He doesn't tell us to care for the poor, the needy, the least among us but only if them meet certain conditions. He gave love, sustenance, support, grace, healing, resurrection, forgiveness to all who needed and would accept it, regardless of who they were and their lifestyle. His life was given the same way, and His offer of salvation is still offered the same way. bill o'reilly's Christianity isn't much different than that of the westboro church's. I just can't reconcile that with the Christianity of Jesus Christ.
It is no secret that Bill O'Reilly is an ass of gigantic proportions. However, in a segment on last night's O'Reilly Factor, Bill manages to outdo his own gigantic assiness. In response to recent Republican efforts to dismantle SNAP and the Vatican's new-found concern for the poor, Rep. Jim McDermott (D-WA) made a comment in a conversation with Al Sharpton that when Jesus fed five thousand people with five loaves of bread and two fish, “he didn’t charge food stamps.”
This made Bill O' ooh so mad and he simply wasn't going to stand for it. Letting his hatred for all things perceived as "nanny state" fly, he graciously acknowledged that Jesus would be just fine with feeding the poors so long as it didn't inconvenience anyone with actual money.
In a conversation with Pentecostal Pastor Joshua Dubois, Bill tries to school the good pastor on all those alcoholics and drug addicts picking his pocket for free food. In actuality, it was Pastor Dubois who schooled O'Reilly. The video and juicier bits of the conversation transcribed below.
http://youtu.be/9vTuEHX81Eo
O'Reilly: The problem I have, as I stated is that you’re helping one group by hurting another group and a bigger group, and so I don’t know if Jesus is going to be down with that. Dubois: Jesus would be down for the poor. He would want to make sure every single person in this country had enough food to eat. And the bottom line is if you add up every single private charitable dollar that feeds hungry people in this country, it’s only 10 percent of what we would need to make sure everyone has food in their stomachs. The rest comes from the federal government.
O'Reilly: You’re making a powerful argument, but there is one huge mistake in it. And that is that some of the people who don’t have enough to eat, it’s their fault they don’t have enough to eat. Particularly with their children.
If you’re an alcoholic or heroin addict or a drug addict and you can’t hold a job, alright, and you can’t support your children — and that’s a circumstance of millions and millions of people, not most, but a lot, a substantial minority — then it’s your fault, you’re bringing the havoc, that you’re asking people who may be struggling themselves to put food on the table to give their tax money to you. And then you’re not even going to buy food with it, you’re going to buy booze and drugs with it.
Dubois: With all due respect, there’s a lot of misconceptions in what you just said. The vast majority of that program goes to elderly people, people who are disabled, 46 percent are children and most people are working families.
O'Reilly: My parents didn’t make a lot of money and they were able to put food on the table. I give a lot of money — and you probably know this — to children’s charities, okay? Children who have derelict parents. And I say, it’s not the kids’ fault so I’m going to give the money to the kids. But I don’t give it to charities unless the charity hands it to the kids, gets it right to the kids. So, I’m circumventing the drugs and the alcohol and the other craziness, alright?
Dubois: I don’t live in a derelict country. There are some folks that have the problems that you described, but that is not the vast majority of food stamp recipients.
I have to applaud Pastor Dubois for standing up to O'Reilly so pointedly. O'Reilly only served to come off as the cruel, heartless Republican he is. In his mind and in the minds of so many Republicans, being poor is just exactly what you deserve for having the audacity to be poor. In order to expunge his putrid soul for these uncharitable thoughts, he must convince himself that these people are subhuman addicts not worthy of wiping his shoes on. I am not a Christian and I do not pretend to speak for Jesus and how he would have felt about food stamps, but having read a great deal what he was purported to have stood for, I'm pretty sure that Bill O'Reilly has this exactly wrong.

Originally posted to Steveningen on Wed Dec 04, 2013 at 09:31 AM PST.

Also republished by Hunger in America

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/12/04/1260075/-Bill-O-Reilly-speaks-on-behalf-of-Jesus-about-the-scourge-Food-Stamps?detail=email 

What's the Best Way to Remember Nelson Mandela? & Dick Cheney Didn't (Doesn't) Regret His Vote Against Freeing Nelson Mandela, Maintained He Was A 'Terrorist' 6&5DEZ13

HERE is a really good piece from HuffPost on the living, active memory and legacy of Nelson Mandela. It is followed by the ignorance of dick cheney, I include that to reinforce the activism of Nelson Mandela, a campaign for freedom, democracy and social justice that must be continued in South Africa and applied to the United States and around the world. Godspeed Madiba.....I have more on Nelson Mandela at N'Kosi Sikeleli iAfrika (Miriam Makeba, Ladysmith Black Mambazo, Paul Simon) & Remembering activist and peacemaker Nelson Mandela 5DEZ13 http://bucknacktssordidtawdryblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/nkosi-sikeleli-miriam-makeba-ladysmith.html
 RIP Nelson Mandela

After democracy came, they tore down the prison where freedom fighters were held and used the bricks to build the nation's first Constitutional Court.
Visitors to South Africa are often struck by the depth and breadth of that country's affection for Nelson Mandela. I still have the newspaper I bought at a supermarket checkout counter there on the day of Mandela's planned release from the hospital. The headline uses Mandela's clan name and reads, "Madiba expected to return home today."
20 years ago it would have been unthinkable to imagine kind words about an ANC leader, much less the use of an African clan name, in a supermarket tabloid. Times change.
But Nelson Mandela wasn't a "personality" politician. He was the leader of a movement and a model for the world. We'll be learning from his example long after the eulogies have ended.
Mandela the Teacher
Not long after his release from prison, Mandela made a cameo appearance in Spike Lee's film biography of Malcolm X. As the film ends he reads Malcolm X's words to a room full of schoolchildren:
"We declare our right on this Earth: to be a man, to be a human being, to be given the rights of a human being, to be respected as a human being; in this society, on this Earth, on this day which we intend to bring into existence by any means necessary."
Mandela was making a strong political statement by reading those words to American film audiences in 1992, while he was still negotiating a transition plan with the apartheid government. (Today it may be a strong political statement to portray a schoolteacher for American audiences, given the coordinated political assault now underway against public schools and those who teach there.) Nelson Mandela had, and has, much to teach the rest of the world - about courage, about idealism, about leadership. His speeches to activists around the world, especially those who helped in the struggle against apartheid, often ended with words that would also be appropriate for a teacher addressing his students.
"We respect you," Mandela would say, "we admire you, and above all we love you."
Mandela the Fighter
Outside the Magistrates Court in Johannesburg stands a statue of young Nelson Mandela as a boxer. The sculpture is based on a 1953 photograph of Mandela sparring on a rooftop with a professional boxer named Jerry Moloi.
Nelson Mandela was a lawyer by training and an amateur boxer by avocation. He was not afraid to fight when fighting was called for. His willingness to read those words of Malcolm X's - "by any means necessary" - mirrored his own evolution as a leader.
We will hear much in the coming days about Mandela the peacemaker. We'll probably hear less about the underground years when peaceful means were denied to him. The world came to know a sage and grandfatherly figure, but in his youth Mandela was a powerful fighter for his ideals.
We're fortunate to live in a country where we have nonviolent tools for change, even if we sometimes lack the will to use them. But we have something to learn from Mandela the fighter, too: he could not have been a peacemaker in his later years if he had not been a fighter in his youth.
Mandela the Prisoner
27 years. 27 years in prison couldn't break the will of an individual or a movement.
Victory seemed impossible. Western nations opposed or ignored them. Their own nation treated them as subhuman. They were shot, beaten, starved, and tortured. Their words were never published in the papers, never heard on radio or TV. They were not allowed to congregate, to print their own literature, even to exist as a movement.
And yet, even after 27 years, they never gave up. Not Mandela, not his colleagues, not the people of South Africa.
In this country we're told that it's "politically impossible" to enact policies which reflect the needs of the majority. Nelson Mandela and the ANC gave the world a case study in accomplishing the "impossible," in much tougher conditions and against much longer odds than we will ever know.
They succeeded - by doing what's right, and by never giving up.
Mandela the Idealist
Mandela's movement went underground for many years because powerful forces had been closed off all peaceful avenues for change. One of those forces was the conservative movement - here, in Great Britain, and elsewhere. Right-wingers insisted that it was wrong to impose sanctions on South Africa or to pressure its government to grant democratic rights to its people.
Conservatives prolonged South Africa's suffering. They couldn't imagine that the freedom movement might win, couldn't see that in fact it was destined to win.
The Right: wrong again. This would be a good day for them to apologize.
Mandela united his country, but he didn't do it by trying to please everyone. He negotiated, but not before struggling wholeheartedly for his ideals - and only when he believed that negotiation served those ideals.
Mandela's Movement
A mobilized majority can accomplish great things. The will of a democratic majority can change the course of history. Mandela's movement had the power of the majority on its side.
Another powerful weapon against apartheid was the global movement which opposed it and fought for sanctions against South Africa. Those sanctions helped convince the white leadership a change was needed.
That movement extended beyond the borders of South Africa, encircling the world with a common goal and a shared belief: that when one nation is not free, no nation is free. Today, in this time of worldwide economic inequality and global free trade deals, we need that kind of global movement again.
Mandela's Mercy
President Mandela named his home "Genadendal," which we're told means "Valley of Mercy" in Afrikaans. He tempered his justice with mercy. But justice came first.
Mandela offered clemency to his old enemies, which frustrated many of his allies, but he only did so after they acknowledged their wrongdoing. Our country has made a habit of offering premature clemency, whether to bankers or torturers, without so much as an admission of guilt or a willingness to make reparations.
Another lesson: Mercy is not surrender, and surrender is not mercy.
Mandela's Memory
Liliesleaf Farm, an underground hideout where several ANC leaders were arrested, is being marketed as a tourist attraction. I toured the surviving wing of Johannesburg's political prison alongside schoolchildren in uniforms, for whom the days of ANC struggle must seem as distant as 1776 did to us.
It would be tragic if Nelson Mandela were reduced to some kind of historical action figure. He has more to teach us, even now.
Mandela's embrace of the Springboks soccer team, memorialized in the film Invictus, was one of many conciliatory gestures - symbolic and substantial - that eased racial tensions and made him beloved by many white South Africans. I heard him spoken of admiringly in South Asian neighborhoods that were once "colored" townships, and in many villages (especially the ones not controlled by ANC's rivals in the Inkatha Party).
But South Africa suffers from severe economic inequality, dire poverty, and widespread violent crime. Corruption arose after apartheid suppressed generations of potential leaders. The ruling class imprisoned Mandela through decades when he might have been leading his country toward a better life.
Nelson Mandela had an egalitarian economic and social agenda, but first he needed to forge a nation out of bitterly divided communities. Had he been given more time, he might have come closer to realizing his vision of a just society. He leaves his nation with a mission as well as a memory.
Unfinished Work
His movement was South Africa's. But it's our movement, too, around the world and here in the United States. It's a movement for human rights, for the elimination of discrimination in all its forms, for the creation of an economy and a society where every human being is able to live up to her or his fullest potential.
We can remember Nelson Mandela by continuing the work of that movement, and by remembering through his example that nothing is impossible if the people are behind it. We can commemorate his life by pledging to finish what he started.
Nelson Mandela and his colleagues tore down prisons and built halls of justice in their place. Today his work is done. It's our work now, if we're worthy of it.
"There is no passion to be found playing small--in settling for a life that is less than the one you are capable of living."
- Nelson Mandela
Follow Richard (RJ) Eskow on Twitter: www.twitter.com/rjeskow
 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rj-eskow/whats-the-best-way-to-rem_b_4396244.html?utm_source=Alert-blogger&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Email%2BNotifications

Dick Cheney Didn't Regret His Vote Against Freeing Nelson Mandela, Maintained He Was A 'Terrorist'


In 1986, Nelson Mandela -- the former president of South Africa who died Thursday at the age of 95 -- was serving the 23rd year of what would ultimately be a 27-year prison sentence. The Western world was finally acknowledging the true horrors of Apartheid, a system of racial segregation that denied basic rights to blacks -- including citizenship and the right to vote -- and brutally oppressed a generation of South Africans fighting for equality.
In the U.S. Congress, lawmakers were ready to show their opposition to the South African regime with the Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act, a bill that called for tough sanctions and travel restrictions on the nation and its leaders, and for the repeal of apartheid laws and release of political prisoners like Mandela, then leader of the African National Congress (ANC).
The measure passed with bipartisan support, despite strong and largely Republican opposition. President Ronald Reagan was among those most opposed to the bill, and when he finally vetoed the measure over its support of the ANC, which he maintained was a "terrorist organization," it took another vote by Congress to override it. Among the Republicans who repeatedly voted against the measure was future Vice President Dick Cheney, then a Republican congressman from Wyoming.
Cheney's staunch resistance to the Anti-Apartheid Act arose as an issue during his future campaigns on the presidential ticket, but the Wyoming Republican has never said he regretted voting the way he did. In fact, in 2000, he maintained that he'd made the right decision.
“The ANC was then viewed as a terrorist organization," Cheney said on ABC's "This Week." "I don't have any problems at all with the vote I cast 20 years ago.''
Cheney went on to call Mandela a "great man" who had "mellowed" in the decade after his release from prison.
In 2004, Democratic vice presidential candidate John Edwards tore into his counterpart's congressional voting record, calling out Cheney for his vote against freeing Mandela. Shortly after, Cheney historian John Nichols said that he'd spoken to Mandela about Cheney's record and worldview. Like many, Mandela was concerned:
He’s very blunt about it he says one of the many reasons why he fears Dick Cheney’s power in the United States, and Mandela does say, he understands that Cheney is effectively the President of the United States, he says, one of the many reasons that he fears Dick Cheney’s power is that in the late 1980’s when even prominent Republicans like Jack Kemp and Newt Gingrich were acknowledging the crime of Apartheid, Dick Cheney maintained the lie that the ANC was a terrorist organization and a fantasy that Nelson Mandela was a terrorist leader who deserved to be in jail. Frankly it begs very powerful question. If Dick Cheney’s judgment was that bad in the late 1980’s, why would we believe that it’s gotten any better in the early 21st century?
A handful of sitting lawmakers also voted against freeing Mandela. GOP Reps. Joe Barton (Texas), Howard Coble (N.C.) and Hal Rogers (Ky.) opposed the Anti-Apartheid Act throughout the legislative process. Texas Rep. Ralph Hall, then a Democrat, voted against the bill, but did not vote on the veto override.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/12/05/dick-cheney-nelson-mandela-terrorist_n_4394071.html?ref=topbar

05 December 2013

N'Kosi Sikeleli iAfrika (Miriam Makeba, Ladysmith Black Mambazo, Paul Simon) & Remembering activist and peacemaker Nelson Mandela 5DEZ13

RIP Nelson Mandela 
MORE on the life and death of Nelson Mandela, Madiba, from the PBS NewsHour after this video of N'Kosi Sikeleli iAfrika....And I have more on Nelson Mandela at Nelson Mandela (1918-2013), Inspiration To World, Dies At 95 Nkosi Sikelel' iAfrika & Nelson Mandela (from Wikipedia) 5DEZ13 http://bucknacktssordidtawdryblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/nelson-mandela-1918-2013-inspiration-to.html
 Miriam Makeba, Ladysmith Black Mambazo and Paul Simon performing South Africa's National Anthem, 1989.
http://youtu.be/MFW7845XO3g

South African President Zuma on Mandela's death: 'Our people have lost a father'

 

The world remembers Nelson Mandela

 South African President Jacob Zuma mourns the death of Nelson Mandela Thursday.
http://youtu.be/gnMq0tUOPsU 
Former South African president Nelson Mandela dies Thursday at the age of 95.
Counting himself among the millions influenced by Mandela, President Barack Obama on Thursday mourned the death of the anti-apartheid icon with whom he shares the distinction of being his nation's first black president.
"He no longer belongs to us. He belongs to the ages," Obama said in a somber appearance at the White House.
South African President Jacob Zuma addressed a nation in mourning.
"We've lost our greatest son. Our nation has lost its greatest son. Our people have lost a father," Zuma said. "Although we knew that this day would come, nothing can diminish our sense of a profound and enduring loss."
PBS NewsHour will continue to update this post as world leaders and others from around the globe speak on the loss of the former South African President and activist.
President Obama speaks to the nation on the passing of Nelson Mandela:
http://youtu.be/-yGgnot1P-8
GWEN IFILL: Nelson Mandela's death was formally announced late today by South Africa's current president, Jacob Zuma.
He expressed the country's love and sense of loss for their iconic leader, often referred to, out of respect, by his clan name, Madiba.
PRESIDENT JACOB ZUMA, South Africa: Our beloved Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela, the founding president of our democratic nation, has departed.
He passed on peacefully in the company of his family around 20:50 on the 5th of December, 2013. He is now resting. He is now at peace.
Our nation has lost its greatest son. Our people have lost a father. Although we knew that this day would come, nothing can diminish our sense of a profound and enduring loss. His tireless struggle for freedom earned him the respect of the world.
His humility, his compassion, and his humanity earned him their love. Our thoughts and prayers are with the Mandela family. Our thoughts are with the South African people, who today mourn the loss of the one person who, more than any other, came to embody their sense of a common nationhood.
Our thoughts are with the millions of people across the world who embraced Madiba as their own and who saw his cause as their cause.
This is the moment of our deepest sorrow. Our nation has lost its greatest son.
Yet, what made Nelson Mandela great was precisely what made him human. We saw in him what we seek in ourselves.
As we gather, wherever we are in the country and wherever we are in the world, let us recall the values for which Madiba fought. Let us reaffirm his vision of a society in which none is exploited, oppressed or dispossessed by another.
Let us commit ourselves to strive together -- sparing neither strength nor courage -- to build a united, non-racial, non-sexist, democratic and prosperous South Africa.
Let us express, each in our own way, the deep gratitude we feel for a life spent in service of the people of this country and in the cause of humanity.
 That is indeed the moment of our deepest sorrow. Yet it must also be the moment of our greatest determination, a determination to live as Madiba has lived, to strive as Madiba has strived, and to not rest until we have realized his vision of a truly united South Africa, a peaceful and prosperous Africa, and a better world.
We will always love you, Madiba. May your soul rest in peace.
God bless Africa.
JUDY WOODRUFF: That was South Africa's president, Jacob Zuma.
 
UPDATED 6:20 EST:
Message from The Nelson Mandela Foundation, The Nelson Mandela Children's Fund and The Mandela Rhodes Foundation:
"It is with the deepest regret that we have learned of the passing of our founder, Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela - Madiba. The Presidency of the Republic of South Africa will shortly make further official announcements.
We want to express our sadness at this time. No words can adequately describe this enormous loss to our nation and to the world.
We give thanks for his life, his leadership, his devotion to humanity and humanitarian causes. We salute our friend, colleague and comrade and thank him for his sacrifices for our freedom. The three charitable organisations that he created dedicate ourselves to continue promoting his extraordinay legacy.
Hamba Kahle Madiba"
Gathering outside Mandela's house:

More and more people are arriving at Madiba's house