NORTON META TAG

Showing posts with label Fed Stimulus funding. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fed Stimulus funding. Show all posts

07 December 2012

Today's Job Numbers Show Why Job-Creation Must Take Precedence Over Deficit Reduction & Unemployment rate drops to 7.7% as economy shrugs off Sandy 7DEZ12

THE jobs report shows some improvement but Robert Reich is correct, the government must do more to stimulate the economy and put people and money back to work. Enough of the bullshit propaganda from the repiglicans and tea-baggers. We have to spend money to make money, failure to do so means a weak economy with an underemployed and underpaid workforce and too many resigned to never finding gainful employment. Our education ranking will continue to decline, our infrastructure will continue to crumble, the 98% of us that actually depend on income from working will continue to fall behind, income inequality will increase and the nation will stagnate, economically, spiritually, culturally, and we will become more divided politically. This can not be allowed to happen. Pres Obama, the Democratic Party and moderate republicans must join together to raise the debt ceiling, increase non defense domestic spending, cut the defense budget, get out troops out of Afghanistan before the end of 2014 and raise the taxes on the wealthy 2% and corporations while closing their tax loopholes and ending corporate welfare like the tax breaks and subsidies for big oil. See my earlier post Top Two Percent To GOP: Tax Us & Defense Execs Say Deeper DoD Budget Cuts, Higher Taxes OK 5&3DEZ12
From HuffPost and the Washington Post.....

Today's jobs report shows an economy that's still moving in the right direction but way too slowly, which is why Washington's continuing obsession with the federal budget deficit is insane. Jobs and growth must come first.
The cost of borrowing is so low -- the yield on the ten-year Treasury is near historic lows -- and the need for more jobs and better wages so high, and our infrastructure so neglected, that it's insanity not to borrow more to put more Americans to work rebuilding the nation.
Yes, unemployment is down slightly and 146,000 new jobs were created in November. That's some progress. But don't be blinded by the hype coming out of Wall Street and the White House, both of which want the public to believe everything is going wonderfully well.
The fact is some 350,000 more people stopped looking for jobs in November, and the percent of the working-age population in jobs continues to drop -- now at 63.6 percent, almost the lowest in 30 years. Meanwhile, the average workweek is stuck at 34.4 hours.
The slowness of this recovery isn't because of Hurricane Sandy, which it turns out had very little impact on these job numbers. And it's not because of any uncertainty over the looming "fiscal cliff." Most consumers in November were oblivious about any pending cliff.
The reason the economy is still under-performing is demand is inadequate. Businesses won't create more jobs without enough customers. But consumers can't and won't spend because they don't have the money. Unless or until the private sector -- businesses and consumers -- are able to boost the economy, government must be the spender of last resort.
But the nation has bought into the Republican frame of thinking that we have to "get our fiscal house in order" before the economy can get back on track. Even though Barack Obama was reelected and Democrats gained seats in the House and Senate, that frame is still dominating debate.
Even though we're near a fiscal cliff that illustrates how dangerous deficit reduction can be when so many people are still unemployed, the White House and the Democrats seem incapable of changing the frame of debate.
Jobs must come first. Job creation must be our first priority.
ROBERT B. REICH, Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley, was Secretary of Labor in the Clinton administration. Time Magazine named him one of the ten most effective cabinet secretaries of the last century. He has written thirteen books, including the best sellers "Aftershock" and "The Work of Nations." His latest is an e-book, "Beyond Outrage," now available in paperback. He is also a founding editor of the American Prospect magazine and chairman of Common Cause.
Follow Robert Reich on Twitter: www.twitter.com/RBReich 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-reich/november-jobs-numbers_b_2257674.html?utm_source=Alert-blogger&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Email%2BNotifications 


Unemployment rate drops to 7.7% as economy shrugs off Sandy

By

The unemployment rate dipped and job creation remained steady in November, as the U.S. economy shrugged off any major impact from Hurricane Sandy and showed surprising resilience in the run-up to the “fiscal cliff.”
The November jobs report, released Friday morning, was a pleasant surprise to analysts who had braced for some ugly numbers for a period during which much of the Northeast was reeling from the superstorm. In fact, the national unemployment rate fell to 7.7 percent from 7.9 percent, and the nation added 146,000 jobs, not the mere 85,000 that forecasters had expected.
But the report contained some ominous elements as well. The jobless rate dropped in large part because the labor force fell by 350,000, suggesting that people gave up looking for work. The number of people saying they had a job actually fell by 122,000. And the Labor Department revised downward its estimates of job creation in September and October by a combined 49,000 jobs.
Add it all up, and the conclusion is this: The trend that we thought was underway, of a U.S. economy growing steadily but at an unspectacular pace, remains underway. It was not undone either by the hurricane or by anxiety over looming austerity — the tax hikes and spending cuts scheduled to take effect Jan. 1 if Congress and the White House can’t reach a deal.
Indeed, the job market has been remarkably consistent over the past year, adding an average of 157,000 jobs a month — well above the level needed to keep pace with a growing labor force, but slow enough that it would still take years to bring unemployment down to the 5 percent to 6 percent range. The new report shows no real shift in that trend, which in its way is still good news: It suggests that businesses did not bring their hiring to a halt in November out of fear that lawmakers will be unable to reach a deal and the nation will hit the fiscal cliff.
The report was “stronger than feared but does not materially change the outlook for the labor market,” economist Ryan Wang of HSBC said in a research note.
Markets were little changed Friday, with the Dow Jones average up 0.2 percent at 11:30 a.m. and the Standard & Poor’s index almost precisely flat.
The November report is the first snapshot of the job market released since President Obama was elected Nov. 6, and the first since negotiations over deficit reduction between the White House and House Republicans over the fiscal cliff have resumed and intensified.
Responding to the report Friday morning, House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) referred to those negotiations and focused on the people who are out of work rather than on the drop in the jobless rate.
“The Democrats’ slow-walk strategy is unfair to taxpayers, unfair to small businesses, and unfair to all those looking for work,” Boehner said in a statement. “If the president doesn’t like our plan, he has an obligation to send us one that can pass both houses of Congress as quickly as possible. We’re ready and eager to work with him on such a proposal.”
Alan Krueger, chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, said in a statement that “while more work remains to be done, today’s employment report provides further evidence that the U.S. economy is continuing to heal from the wounds inflicted by the worst downturn since the Great Depression.”
Forecasters had expected a significant impact from Sandy, which struck at the tail end of October and disrupted commerce in large parts of New Jersey, New York and surrounding states. The level of new claims for unemployment benefits spiked from about 370,000 before the storm to 451,000 in the first week of November.
But the Labor Department said that “survey response rates in the affected states were within normal ranges” and that “our analysis suggests that Hurricane Sandy did not substantively impact the national employment and unemployment estimates for November.” More detailed data will be available Dec. 21, when state jobs numbers will be released, allowing a closer look at any employment changes in the affected states.
The biggest category for job gains was the retail sector, which added 53,000 positions. But that growth could be due to Thanksgiving falling relatively early on the calendar this year, meaning retailers likely added temporary seasonal workers earlier than they normally would.
Other major sectors that saw job gains were professional and business services, which added 43,000 jobs, and leisure and hospitality, with 23,000.
The biggest category for job losses was construction, which shed 20,000 positions, though that may well be a Sandy effect, as construction sites temporarily shut down in the Northeast. If that’s the case, that sector will be expected to rebound in the months ahead, as those construction workers get back on the job and rebuilding efforts bring in more work.
Average hourly pay for private sector workers rose four cents to $23.63, a 0.3 percent increase in average weekly earnings.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/unemployment-rate-drops-as-economy-shrugs-off-sandy/2012/12/07/e7d2c482-4070-11e2-a2d9-822f58ac9fd5_print.html 
 

30 August 2012

Fact Checkers Say Some Of Ryan's Claims Don't Add Up 30AUG12 &Paul Ryan said President Obama “funneled” $716 billion out of Medicare “at the expense of the elderly.” 29AUG12

paul ryan's speech at the gop / tea-bagger convention is full of lies, not a big surprise, but one has to wonder if, as a Catholic, he will list these lies as a some of his sins when he goes to confession......
Rep. Paul Ryan stretched some truths Wednesday night when he accepted the Republican Party's 2012 vice presidential nomination, according to the fact checkers who parse politicians' words for news outlets and independent watchdogs:
FactCheck.org found several problems with what Ryan said. Among them: Ryan "accused President Obama's health care law of funneling money away from Medicare 'at the expense of the elderly.' In fact, Medicare's chief actuary says the law 'substantially improves' the system's finances, and Ryan himself has embraced the same savings."
FactCheck also notes that Ryan "accused Obama of doing "exactly nothing" about recommendations of a bipartisan deficit commission — which Ryan himself helped scuttle."
— The Wisconsin congressman earned a "false" rating from PolitiFact.com on one statement. He got it for noting that then-candidate Barack Obama told the people of Janesville, Wis. (Ryan's home town) that the GM plant there would be open another 100 years if the government gave it the right support. "That plant didn't last another year," Ryan said, implying that Obama broke a promise. Ryan didn't say that the plant actually closed in 2008, before Obama took office.
— Ryan "took some factual shortcuts," The Associated Press says. For instance, Ryan said the economic stimulus package passed in the early days of the Obama administration "was a case of political patronage, corporate welfare and cronyism at their worst. You, the working men and women of this country, were cut out of the deal."
The AP says that: "Ryan himself asked for stimulus funds shortly after Congress approved the $800 billion plan, known as the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Ryan's pleas to federal agencies included letters to Energy Secretary Steven Chu and Labor Secretary Hilda Solis seeking stimulus grant money for two Wisconsin energy conservation companies."
— And as for the recurring "we built it" theme of the convention and Republicans' insistence that Obama doesn't think business people deserve credit for their successes — a line of attack Ryan returned to — The Washington Post's Fact Checker has now given the GOP "four Pinocchios" on that one.
When the president said "you didn't build that," the Post has concluded, he appeared "to be making the unremarkable point that companies and entrepreneurs often benefit in some way from taxpayer support for roads, education and so forth. In other words, he [was] trying to make the case for higher taxes, and for why he believes the rich should pay more, which as we noted is part of a long Democratic tradition. He just did not put it very eloquently."
http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2012/08/30/160301854/fact-checkers-say-some-of-ryans-claims-dont-add-up?ft=1&f=139482413
The Truth-O-Meter Says:
Ryan

President Obama "funneled" $716 billion out of Medicare "at the expense of the elderly."

Paul Ryan on Wednesday, August 29th, 2012 in a speech at the Republican National Convention

Paul Ryan said President Obama “funneled” $716 billion out of Medicare “at the expense of the elderly.”

Vice presidential nominee Paul Ryan has made some of his sharpest attacks yet on Barack Obama’s health care law, calling the law "the greatest threat to Medicare."

Ryan himself advocates a plan to give voucher-like credits to seniors, so they can shop for a private plan or choose a traditional Medicare option. That plan has come under withering attack from Democrats.

Ryan fired back Aug. 29 during his acceptance speech at the at the Republican National Convention in Tampa.

"The biggest, coldest power play of all in Obamacare came at the expense of the elderly," Ryan said. "You see, even with all the hidden taxes to pay for the health care takeover, even with a new law and new taxes on nearly a million small businesses, the planners in Washington still didn’t have enough money. They needed more. They needed hundreds of billions more.

"So, they just took it all away from Medicare, $716 billion, funneled out of Medicare by President Obama. An obligation we have to our parents and grandparents is being sacrificed, all to pay for a new entitlement we didn’t even ask for. The greatest threat to Medicare is Obamacare, and we’re going to stop it."

Ryan’s comments are highly misleading. Neither Obama nor his health care law literally cut funding from the Medicare program’s budget. Still, the number has a slight basis in fact.

The health care law instituted a number of changes to try to bring down future health care costs in the program. The total anticipated savings comes to $716 billion over the next 10 years, as determined by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

We should note that both parties agree Medicare spending is increasing too fast as baby boomers retire and medical costs increase. The government needs to find savings so those costs don’t overwhelm the federal budget in the future.

So, yes, Obama’s law did find $716 billion in spending reductions. They were mainly aimed at insurance companies and hospitals, not beneficiaries. The law made significant reductions to Medicare Advantage, a subset of Medicare plans run by private insurers. Medicare Advantage was started under President George W. Bush, and the idea was that competition among the private insurers would reduce costs. But the plans have actually cost the government more than traditional Medicare. The health care law scales back the payments to private insurers.
  
Hospitals, too, will be paid less if they have too many re-admissions, or if they fail to meet other new benchmarks for patient care.
  
Obama and fellow Democrats say the intention is to protect beneficiaries' coverage while forcing health care providers to become more efficient. Even with the health care law’s cost-saving measures, the overall Medicare budget is still projected to go up for the foreseeable future.

There is a connection between the Medicare cost savings and the health care law. At the time the health care law was being finalized, Democrats said it was important to them that the new law not add to the deficit. So the reductions in Medicare spending were counted against the health care law’s new spending.

We should point out that some new spending is within the Medicare program, such as increasing coverage for prescription drugs and offering preventive care with no out-of-pocket costs.
  
More significantly, though, the law moves to cover the uninsured, by giving them tax credits to buy private insurance. It also expands Medicaid, the state insurance program for the poor. The savings from Medicare offset that spending.
  
The health law also imposes new taxes, primarily on the wealthy and on the health care industry. That, too, offsets the new spending.

Our ruling

Ryan said Obama "funneled" $716 billion out of Medicare "at the expense of the elderly." This gives a very misleading impression.

In fact, the law limits payments to health care providers and insurers to try to reduce the rapid growth of future Medicare spending. Lawmakers said they hoped the measures would improve care and efficiency. Those savings, spread out over the next 10 years, are then used to offset costs created by the law (especially coverage for the uninsured) so that the overall law doesn't add to the deficit. Ryan’s statement is exaggerated and we rate it Mostly False.
About this statement:
Published: Wednesday, August 29th, 2012 at 11:27 p.m.
Subjects: Federal Budget, Medicare
Sources:
Republican National Convention, remarks by Paul Ryan, Aug. 29, 2012

PolitiFact, Romney says Obama 'cuts' $716B from Medicare to pay for Obamacare, Aug. 20, 2012

Congressional Budget Office, Letter to the Honorable John Boehner providing an estimate for H.R. 6079, the Repeal of Obamacare Act, July 24, 2012
          
Congressional Budget Office, CBO's Analysis of the Major Health Care Legislation Enacted in March 2010, March 30, 2011
          
Congressional Budget Office, H.R. 2, Repealing the Job-Killing Health Care Law Act, February 18, 2011
          
Congressional Budget Office, The Long-Term Budgetary Impact of Paths for Federal Revenues and Spending Specified by Chairman Ryan, March 20, 2012
          
PolitiFact, "Medicare 'cuts' in the health care law will hurt seniors, says 60 Plus Association," Sept. 20, 2010
  
The Kaiser Family Foundation, Health Reform and Medicare: Overview of Key Provisions, July 2010

PolitiFact, "$500 billion from Medicare for Obamacare, Mitt Romney says," June 16, 2011


Written by: Angie Drobnic Holan
Researched by: Angie Drobnic Holan
Edited by: Bridget Hall Grumethttp://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/aug/29/paul-ryan/paul-ryan-said-president-obama-funneled-716-billio/

11 GOP convention speakers who actually ‘didn’t build that’ 28AUG12

CONTINUING lies, deception, misinformation, propaganda and hypocrisy from the gop / tea-baggers who claim to detest and despise the federal government, government spending (in someone else's district) and who continue to misrepresent Pres Obama's comments about America's social contract. Here are 11 gop / tea-bagger hypocrites who are speaking at their convention in Tampa with examples of their soliciting, supporting and taking credit for federal and state tax dollars being spent in their districts supporting the public and private sectors....
 
Rep. Pete Sessions (R-TX) via republicanconference / Flickr
 
Despite the fact that the Republican National Convention is held in a stadium that was financed with $86 million in public funds, the theme this year is “We built this!”
The theme is designed to be an affront to President Barack Obama’s supposed claim that those with successful businesses don’t deserve credit. The Romney campaign has dug in with an attack ad that says Obama’s message to business owners is “you didn’t build that,” despite the full context of the quote, which he used in a Virginia speech in July.
“If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help,” Obama explained. “There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business — you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen.”
And the theme has been taken to heart by numerous candidates and delegates invited to speak at the convention. Looking at the prepared remarks for Tuesday alone, a number of speakers skipped over ways that their accomplishments had been supported by the government.
1) Rep. Pete Sessions of Texas, when touting this Congress’ record of “implementing free enterprise policies that create jobs, cutting spending and repealing Obamacare,” failed to mention that — despite his very public opposition to the American Recovery Act in 2009, he secretly requested $81 million in stimulus money from Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood.
2) When Host Committee Chairman Al Austin thanked attendees for stimulating the Tampa Bay economy with the Republican National Convention, he failed to mention the $50 million federal grant provided to make the convention possible. An estimated $2.7 million of that grant went to spending on security alone.
3) Ricky Gill , a Republican Candidate for Congress for California’s 9th district, called himself “a proud son of California’s San Joaquin Valley.” The valley is a robust farming community in central California, which, in addition being a recipient of some of the billions in farm subsidies that framing communities receive annually, has been dealing with a desperate drought. Republicans on the Natural Resources Committee in the House put forth legislation “to prevent future California man-made droughts” through public allocation of water to the valley.
4) Rep. Tim Griffin, representing the 2nd congressional district in Arkansas, said that a private company in his district awaits the building of the Keystone pipeline, a project that has even been opposed by Republicans because of it’s hefty $260 billion estimated price tag. “In Little Rock, we have a company with over 500 miles of pipe ready for the Keystone pipeline – but that pipe is sitting in a stack,” and will be, apparently until the federal funding comes through.
5) Rep. Francisco Canseco from Texas touted the fact that his district included “800 miles of U.S.-Mexico border,” which is secured by the U.S. Border Patrol, which has a workforce of nearly 20,000 employed directly by the federal government. The size of the Border Patrol has doubled since 2004. (Incidentally, Canseco isn’t so friendly with every U.S. security agency, since he claims to have had an intimate encounter with the Transportation Security Administration earlier this year.)
6) Tampa Mayor Bob Buckhorn not only touted the city’s immigrant population — even though at least 30 percent of immigrant-led households in Florida participate in at least one major welfare program — but also touted the city’s home to MacDill Air Force Base, which faced a 7 percent cut this year to its $10.5 billion annual budget.
7) Keith Rothfus, running for Congress in Pennsylvania’s 12th district, said he was a cancer survivor, has been a beneficiary of some of the research subsidized by the National Cancer Institute, which receives some $5 billion annually from the federal government. The Romney-Ryan budget proposes cuts to the funding of cancer research.
8) Andy Barr, running for Kentucky’s 6th district in Kentucky, cited Toyota’s “7,000 jobs in Georgetown, Kentucky,” made possible in part by $6.5 billion in tax incentives provided by the Kentucky Business Investment program, a state-funded program.
9) Oklahoma City Mayor Mick Cornett admitted that there’s “a role for Washington in addressing our city’s critical infrastructure needs,” but cited the fact that his city “was recently named as the most entrepreneurial city in the country, with the most start-ups per capita.” That could be in part due to the $30 billion in federal grant money allocated by the Oklahoma City Small Business Administration district office.
10) Lisa Stickan, chair of the Young Republicans, studied law at Cleveland State University, a public university that received some $210 million annually from the state until 2010, when a Republican-legislature cut 34 percent of its budget. Stickan probably would have found paying for college difficult without federally funded student loans and/or grants, or a tax-free college savings plan.
11) Utah’s Rep. Jason Chaffetz touted a “$500,000 grant under the Small Community Air Service Development Program” in 2010 given by the U.S. Department of Transportation, but didn’t mention that when he applauded the generations who “quietly rolled up their sleeves and built a stronger, more prosperous nation. The government didn’t build it. They built it.”
But it seems that those triumphs wouldn’t have been possible without help from the government.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/08/28/11-gop-convention-speakers-who-actually-didnt-build-that/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story%29

12 July 2012

Waste Not, Want Not: Town To Tap Sewers For Energy 12JUL12

THIS is pretty cool and shows what American ingenuity can do if just given the chance and a little financial boost. From NPR...
Brainerd Public Utilities' Scott Sjolund at a sewer site. Sewers around the city were monitored to gauge the amount of potential energy flowing through the system.
Enlarge Conrad Wilson for NPR Brainerd Public Utilities' Scott Sjolund at a sewer site. Sewers around the city were monitored to gauge the amount of potential energy flowing through the system.

Most Americans use electricity, gas or oil to heat and cool their homes. But the small city of Brainerd, Minn., is turning to something a bit less conventional: the sewer.
As it turns out, a sewer — the place where a city's hot showers, dishwashing water and organic matter end up — is a pretty warm place. That heat can generate energy — meaning a city's sewer system can hold tremendous potential for heating and cooling.
It's just that unexpected energy source that Brainerd hopes to exploit.
Scott Sjolund, technology supervisor for Brainerd Public Utilities, is standing on the corner of 6th Avenue and College Drive in Brainerd, as sewage rushes unseen through underground pipes.
"Everybody heats water up ... and all that gets drained down the sewer, and that's potential energy that could be extracted. That's part of the equation," Sjolund says.
"Actually extracting it in an economical fashion," Sjolund says, is the equation's critical second part.
The idea for this project comes from Brainerd-based company Hidden Fuels. In 2009, the business partnered with the city and the school district and received a $45,000 grant from the federal stimulus package.
Hidden Fuels' Peter Nelson says the first phase of the project involved installing sensors in the city's sewers. For more than a year, the company and the city measured the temperature and amount of sewage running through the system to create a thermal energy map.
Everybody heats water up ... and all that gets drained down the sewer, and that's potential energy that could be extracted.
"It shows that there's a significant amount of energy — literally enough to heat hundreds of homes — within the streets of the city of Brainerd," Nelson says.
That data helped the team match energy sources with buildings where they could install new heating and cooling systems.
Now that they know how much energy is available, Nelson says the next step is converting it into usable energy. That's challenging, he says, but doable.
Hidden Fuels will rely on technology already in use to implement the project, which will function in a manner very similar to geothermal heating and cooling systems. By circulating water through a heat pump, energy can be extracted to either heat or cool a building.
A similar system was used during the 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver, Canada, but that setup didn't tap an existing sewer.
"We're not dealing with clean fluids," Nelson says. "We're dealing with contaminated fluids. And so that's really the challenge ... to be able to operate efficiently in that contaminated environment."
Experts in renewable energy circles says they're impressed by the potential of this idea. John Lund, a professor of civil engineering at the Oregon Institute of Technology, says going to the sewer for energy could cut the cost of installing geothermal heating and cooling systems in half.

Sewer water, he says, is already in the right temperature range. In Brainerd, the temperature in the sewers varies between 42 and 66 degrees Fahrenheit.
"Using sewer water, I think it's a natural," Lund says. "You're just digging in and tapping into the sewer line, and just pulling the heat or rejecting it."
In Brainerd, the police station and the local high school may be the first two buildings to draw energy from the sewer.
Earl Wolleat, director for buildings and grounds with the Brainerd School District, says there's enough energy running in just one of the sewer pipes to heat the entire high school. That could save tens of thousands of dollars every winter.
"If you stop and think about it, it's not surprising that the energy is there," Wolleat says. "But I think it all comes down to the practical application ... to find that way to get that heat out of the sewer."
Wolleat is confident that the technology will work. But with natural gas prices at historic lows, he says, the cost is a drawback. It could take years for the district to amortize the cost of switching systems.
But, he says, "it's definitely going to be an advantage to the district over time." And if the price of fossil fuels goes back up, sewage power could become a more attractive alternative.
In the meantime, Hidden Fuels hopes to have the police station heated by sewer power by the end of this year.

Related NPR Stories


http://www.npr.org/2012/07/12/156624237/waste-not-want-not-town-to-tap-sewers-for-energy?ft=3&f=1001&sc=nl&cc=nh-20120712