NORTON META TAG

Showing posts with label gop convention 2012. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gop convention 2012. Show all posts

06 September 2012

Jon Stewart Would Settle For Any Truths In Paul Ryan’s Speech 31AUG12

NOBODY debunks lyin' paul ryan like Jon Stewart!!!
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-august-30-2012/rnc-2012---the-road-to-jeb-bush-2016---paul-ryan-s-convenient-truths 
Jon StewartJon Stewart
26611
Jon Stewart had a few quibbles with Paul Ryan’s Republican National Convention speech, an address that even traditional media call factually unsound at best.
“Let me get this straight, so if your dry cleaning succeeds with a Democrat in office, you built that,” Stewart said Thursday. “But if your dry cleaning business fails with a Democrat in office, the government fucked you.”
“So still no hard truths,” Stewart added. “It sounds like its just convenient truths. At this point in the speech I’d settle for any truths.”
Watch the video:

The Daily Show with Jon StewartMon - Thurs 11p / 10c
RNC 2012 - The Road to Jeb Bush 2016 - Paul Ryan’s Convenient Truths
www.thedailyshow.com

Daily Show Full EpisodesPolitical Humor & Satire BlogThe Daily Show on Facebook

01 September 2012

A LESSON THE RNC SHOULD HAVE CONSIDERED IN TAMPA AND THE DNC BETTER CONSIDER IN CHARLOTTE


"For the Lord your God is God of gods and Lord of lords, the great God, mighty and awesome, who is not partial and takes no bribe, who executes justice for the orphan and the widow, and who loves the strangers, providing them with food and clothing."
- Deuteronomy 10:17-18

“We have lived our lives by the assumption that what was good for us would be good for the world. We have been wrong. We must change our lives so that it will be possible to live by the contrary assumption, that what is good for the world will be good for us. And that requires that we make the effort to know the world and learn what is good for it.”
- Wendell Berry
from The Long-Legged House

Lyin' Ryan: The Media Push Back 30AUG12

HERE'S a list of political reporters, left and right and nonpartisan (and including FOX NEWS!), who are deriding paul ryan's gop / tea-bagger convention speech as full of lies, misrepresentations and deception. Click the links to see their full analysis.

This diary is a collection of all the media push back (so far) that Paul Ryan has received. I intend to tweet, Facebook and email this list far and wide. Please feel free to add to the list as I will update this diary periodically. Thanks!
Dave Weigel, Slate.com:
"incredible string of false or misleading statements"
http://www.slate.com/...
Joan Walsh, Salon.com:
"His Republican National Convention speech was stunning for its dishonesty"
http://www.salon.com/...
Jonathan Cohn, the New Republic:
The Most Dishonest Convention Speech ... Ever?
http://www.tnr.com/...
TPM:
Top 5 Fibs In Paul Ryan’s Convention Speech
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/...
Michael Tomasky, the Daily Beast:
"Paul Ryan pushed American politics into new territory with his convention speech, effectively daring Democrats and the media to call him out on his string of blatant falsehoods"
http://www.thedailybeast.com/...
Jonathan Bernstein, the Washington Post:
Paul Ryan fails -- the truth
http://www.washingtonpost.com/...
AP:
FACT CHECK: Convention speakers stray from reality
http://www.google.com/...
Dan Amira, NY Magazine:
Paul Ryan Bets on the Ignorance of America
http://nymag.com/...
Fox News contributor, Sally Kohn:
“Ryan’s speech was an apparent attempt to set the world record for the greatest number of blatant lies and misrepresentations slipped into a single political speech.”
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/...
Steve Benen, Maddowblog:
Paul Ryan stands on a foundation of lies
http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/...
Huffington Post:
PAUL TALES: RYAN MISLEADS, AGAIN AND AGAIN
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...
Politicsusa:
5 Biggest lies in Romney’s speech:
http://www.politicususa.com/...
Bob Cesca:
Paul Ryan’s Speech: Lies, Lies and More Lies
http://bobcesca.com/...
Washington Post Editorial Board:
Mr. Ryan’s misleading speech
http://www.washingtonpost.com/...
Factcheck.org
“Paul Ryan’s acceptance speech at the Republican convention contained several false claims and misleading statements.”
http://factcheck.org/...
Andrew Sullivan, the Daily Beast:
The lies and lies of Paul Ryan
http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com/...
Ryan Lizza, the New Yorker:
The Paul Ryan Speech: Five Hypocrisies
http://www.newyorker.com/...
Jonathan Chait, NY magazine:
Paul Ryan’s large lies and one big truth
http://nymag.com/...
James Downie, Washington Post:
Paul Ryan’s breathtakingly dishonest speech
http://www.washingtonpost.com/...
James Fallow, Atlantic
Paul Ryan and the post truth convention
http://www.theatlantic.com/...
Robert Schlesinger, US News
http://www.usnews.com/...
LYIN' Santorum
Rick Santorum repeats inaccurate welfare attack on Obama
http://www.latimes.com/...
Juan Cole:
Top Ten Repeated Paul Ryan Lies
http://www.juancole.com/...
The Guardian:
Paul Ryan's speech: a round-up of his most audacious untruths
http://www.guardian.co.uk/...
Charles Pierce, Esquire:
Paul Ryan Is the Newest New Nixon, a Moocher Belied
http://www.esquire.com/...
Huffington Post
Busted! Ryan's speech fools no one
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...
David Firestone, NYT
Beyond Factual Dishonesty
http://takingnote.blogs.nytimes.com/...
Josh Barro, Bloomberg
Paul Ryan’s Hypocritical Attack on Barack Obama
http://www.bloomberg.com/...
Lindy West, Jezebel.com
Why lying is bad, a primer for confused republicans
http://jezebel.com/...
Jon Stewart, the Daily Show
Jon Stewart Would Settle For Any Truths In Paul Ryan’s Speech
http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/...
William Saletan, Slate.com
Why I’m breaking up with Paul Ryan
http://www.slate.com/...
John Nichols, CBSnews.com
They love the lies Paul Ryan tells
http://www.cbsnews.com/...
Miles Mogulescu, Huffington Post
Paul Ryan: Lying Liar
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...
address_b_1843242.html
Aviva Shen, Think Progress
6 Worst Lies in Paul Ryan's speech
http://thinkprogress.org/...
Rekha Basu, Des Moines Register:
Half the truth often is a full lie for Paul Ryan
http://abetteriowa.desmoinesregister.com/...
Ezra Klein, The Washington Post
A not-very-truthful speech in a not-very-truthful campaign
http://www.washingtonpost.com/...
Henry Blodget, Business Insider
Paul Ryan's Speech Proves The New Political Truth: It's Fine To Lie http://www.businessinsider.com/...
its-fine-to-lie-2012-8#ixzz258ABIMm2
The Week
The media coverage of Paul Ryan's speech: 15 euphemisms for 'lying'
http://theweek.com/...
Alex Seitz-Wald, Salon.com
Paul Ryan: The definitive fact-check
http://www.salon.com/...
Jean Williams, Examiner.com
RNC audience thrilled by Paul Ryan's self-serving and deceitful speech
http://www.examiner.com/...
and-deceitful-speech
Andy Borowitz (satirist), NewYorker.com
Ryan Launches Campaign Theme of Lying About Everything
http://www.newyorker.com/...

31 August 2012

Mitt Romney said Barack Obama began his presidency with an apology tour 31AUG12

mitt romney, a man of faith, a leader in the mormon church, deliberately lied throughout his speech at the gop / tea-bagger convention in Tampa yesterday. So much for honesty counting for anything among mormons and the right wing Christians among his supporters. This from PolitiFact.....

The Truth-O-Meter Says:
Romney

Barack Obama began his presidency "with an apology tour."

Mitt Romney on Thursday, August 30th, 2012 in remarks at the Republican National Convention in Tampa

Mitt Romney said Barack Obama began his presidency with an apology tour

In his speech accepting the Republican nomination for president, Mitt Romney repeated a charge he’s made before: that Obama has traveled the world apologizing for America.

"I will begin my presidency with a jobs tour. President Obama began with an apology tour. America, he said, had dictated to other nations. No, Mr. President, America has freed other nations from dictators," Romney said.

We first fact-checked this claim back in 2010, when Romney published a book, No Apology: The Case for American Greatness.

Obama’s apology tour, Romney wrote, "is his way of signaling to foreign countries and foreign leaders that their dislike for America is something he understands and that is, at least in part, understandable. There are anti-American fires burning all across the globe; President Obama's words are like kindling to them."

"In his first nine months in office, President Obama has issued apologies and criticisms of America in speeches in France, England, Turkey, and Cairo; at the CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia, the National Archives in Washington, D.C., and the United Nations in New York City. He has apologized for what he deems to be American arrogance, dismissiveness, and derision; for dictating solutions, for acting unilaterally, and for acting without regard for others; for treating other countries as mere proxies, for unjustly interfering in the internal affairs of other nations, and for feeding anti-Muslim sentiments; for committing torture, for dragging our feet on global warming and for selectively promoting democracy."

It’s a common theme for some anti-Obama websites and commentators. But is it accurate?

Obama’s early travels and remarks

We looked at the seven separate speeches Romney mentioned in his book as apologies. (We've compiled those passages in a separate document.)

At times, Obama uses an on-the-one-hand, on-the-other-hand formulation that he tends to employ right before he talks about two sides coming together.

At a town hall meeting in France in 2009, for example, Obama encouraged Europe to work with the United States, and admitted that the United States "has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive." But he immediately said that Europe has been guilty of a "casual" and "insidious" anti-Americanism.

At a major address to the United Nations, Obama said, "I took office at a time when many around the world had come to view America with skepticism and distrust. Part of this was due to misperceptions and misinformation about my country. Part of this was due to opposition to specific policies, and a belief that on certain critical issues, America has acted unilaterally, without regard for the interests of others. And this has fed an almost reflexive anti-Americanism, which too often has served as an excuse for collective inaction."

At a speech in Cairo on relations between the U.S. and the Islamic world, Obama got very close to regretting decades-old U.S. actions in Iran. But then he immediately countered with criticism of Iran. He did not make a formal expression of regret, but suggested both countries simply "move forward."

Looking back at those 2009 speeches, we noticed that Obama was most conciliatory when discussing torture and detention at the U.S. military installation at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Typically, Obama would say that the U.S. must always stay true to its ideals, and that's why Obama "unequivocally prohibited the use of torture by the United States, and I have ordered the prison at Guantanamo Bay closed by early next year."

Apologies -- or diplomatic language?

In 2010, we quizzed several experts about whether Obama had apologized. Here’s a brief recap of what they had to say (read more here):

• Nile Gardiner, a foreign policy analyst with the the conservative Heritage Foundation, said Obama was definitely apologizing. He co-wrote an analysis on the topic: "Barack Obama's Top 10 Apologies: How the President Has Humiliated a Superpower."

"Apologizing for your own country projects an image of weakness before both allies and enemies," Gardiner said. "It sends a very clear signal that the U.S. is to blame for some major developments on the world stage. This can be used to the advantage of those who wish to undermine American global leadership."

• John Murphy, a communications professor at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, studies presidential rhetoric and political language. He said Obama used conciliatory language for diplomatic purposes, not apologizing.

"It's much more a sense of establishing of reciprocity," Murphy said. "Each side says, okay, we haven't done great, but we have a new president and we're going to make a fresh start and move forward. I don't think that's an apology."

• Lauren Bloom, an attorney and business consultant, wrote the book, The Art of the Apology, advising businesses and individuals on when to apologize and how to do it.

She said Obama's words fell short of an apology, mostly because he didn't use the words "sorry" or "regret." "I think to make an effective apology, the words 'I'm sorry' or 'we're sorry' always have to be there," Bloom said.

Obama's remarks were really non-apologies, and they're not good in business or personal relationships, Bloom said. The one area where they can be useful: international diplomacy.

"Gov. Romney is trying to appeal to the inner John Wayne of his readers, and that has a certain emotional appeal," Bloom said. "For the rest of us, a level assessment of less-than-perfect human behavior is perfectly reasonable."

• We spoke with Rhoda E. Howard-Hassmann, a professor who tracked international human rights issues via the website Political Apologies and Reparations. Many of the apologies in the database relate to genocide or slavery.

"To say the United States will not torture is not an apology, it is a statement of intent," Howard-Hassman said. "A complete apology has to acknowledge something was wrong, accept responsibility, express sorrow or regret and promise not to repeat it."

Obama's Cairo address in particular was a means of reaching out to the Islamic world, not an acknowledgement of wrongdoing, she said.

"Whether he's apologizing or not, he's saying 'I respect your society and I respect your customs.' Maybe that's what Romney considers an apology, that gesture of respect," she said. "But a gesture of respect is not an apology."

Actual apologies

In the years since we first looked into this matter, Obama or someone in his administration has formally apologized for U.S. actions. In 2012, Obama apologized for the accidental burning of copies of the Quran, the holy book of Islam. Obama sent the apology in a letter to Afghan President Hamid Karzai. Officials hoped the formal apology would quell violent reactions against U.S. troops in Afghanistan.

A few months later, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton apologized to Pakistan for a Nov. 26, 2011, incident involving the death of Pakistani troops. The apology was made as part of an effort to re-open supply routes to U.S. troops in Afghanistan.

We should note that these apologies came toward the end of Obama’s first term, while Romney said Obama "began" his presidency with an apology tour.

Our ruling

Romney said Obama began his presidency "with an apology tour."

But a review of Obama’s foreign travels and remarks during his early presidency showed no evidence to support such a blunt and disparaging claim. (In later years, we found two formal apologies, but they were not at the start of his presidency and not part of a tour.)

While Obama's speeches contained some criticisms of past U.S. actions, he typically combined those passages with praise for the United States and its ideals, and he frequently mentioned how other countries had erred as well. We found not a single, full-throated apology in the bunch.

Calling those remarks "an apology tour" is a ridiculous charge. So we rate his statement Pants on Fire

About this statement:
Published: Friday, August 31st, 2012 at 12:22 a.m.
Subjects: Foreign Policy
Sources:
Republican National Convention, Mitt Romney’s remarks, Aug. 30, 2012

PolitiFact, Obama's remarks never a true 'apology,'March 15, 2010
Mitt Romney, No Apology: The Case for American Greatness, 2010
The Heritage Foundation, Barack Obama's Top 10 Apologies: How the President Has Humiliated a Superpower, June 2, 2009
The American Spectator, Conservatve (sic) Leaders Speak Out Against Obama's Apology Tour, Sept. 25, 2010
Rush Limbaugh, Obama Attacks America Again Ahead of Muslim Apology Tour, June 2, 2009
The White House, Remarks by the President at a town hall in Strasbourg, France, April 3, 2009
The White House, Remarks by the President at joint press availability in London, April 1, 2009
The White House, Remarks by the President at a news conference in London, April 2, 2009
The White House, Remarks by the President in Cairo, Egypt, June 4, 2009
The White House, Remarks by the President on national security at the National Archives, May 21, 2009
The White House, Remarks by the President to CIA employees, Langley, Va., April 20, 2009
The White House, Remarks by the President to the United Nations General Assembly, Sept. 23, 2009
Interview with Nile Gardiner of the Heritage Foundation
Interview with John Murphy of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Interview with Lauren Bloom, author of The Art of the Apology
Interview with Rhoda E. Howard-Hassmann of Wilfrid Laurier University
Wilfrid Laurier University, Political Apologies and Reparations database
The National Archives, speech of President Bill Clinton in Rwanda, March 25, 1998
The National Archives, remarks of President Bill Clinton "in apology for study done in Tuskegee," May 16, 1997
The National Archives, speech of President George W. Bush at Goree Island, Senegal, July 8, 2003
The National Archives, remarks of President George W. Bush with King Abdullah of Jordan, May 6, 2004
Fox News, Bush apologizes for prisoner abuse, May 7, 2004
The White House, Remarks by the President at the Acceptance of the Nobel Peace Prize, Dec. 10, 2009
Foreign Affairs, The Carter Syndrome, by Walter Russell Mead, January 2010
The Wall Street Journal, U.S. Apologizes to Pakistan, Says Supply Routes to Reopen, July 3, 2012

U.S. State Department, Statement by Secretary Clinton on her Call With Pakistani Foreign Minister Khar, July 3, 2012

CNN, Obama apologizes to Afghanistan for Quran burning, Feb. 23, 2012

Written by: Angie Drobnic Holan
Researched by: Angie Drobnic Holan
Edited by: Bill Adair



http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/aug/31/mitt-romney/mitt-romney-said-barack-obama-began-his-presidency/

Clint Eastwood Taxes: Film Director Benefited From Generous Credits 30AUG12

WHO know clint eastwood would be supporting the gop / tea-bagger ticket? It is a surprise, until you look deeper into his business dealings and discover his hypocrisy. Turns out this loud mouth didn't build his own film and directing career on his own, he did it with substantial tax breaks from governments in Detroit and Massachusetts  AND his big "patriotic" movie, Flags Of Our Fathers, was outsourced to Iceland. Check this out from HuffPost....

WASHINGTON -- Film director Clint Eastwood will be cheering on Mitt Romney and his party's "you didn't build that!" message during Thursday night's Republican National Convention festivities.
But there's one small problem: Clint Eastwood didn't build that.
Just like the small business owners who spoke on previous nights at the convention in Tampa, Fla., Eastwood, a hugely successful independent filmmaker, has benefited from generous tax credits to produce his movies all over the world -- the same kinds of film tax credits that Romney signed into law as governor.
Eastwood received a 42 percent tax credit in 2008 after shifting the setting of his movie "Gran Torino" from Minneapolis to Detroit, a city dubbed by The New York Times as "the home of 42 percent tax credits for films made there."
Eastwood also took advantage of a Massachusetts tax credit in 2003 for filming "Mystic River" in that state.
His reliance on government aid has extended beyond U.S. borders. The Hollywood Reporter wrote in 2009 that his movie "Invictus" received a tax incentive package from the South African government that knocked $5 million off the film's budget. Eastwood's 2010 film "Hereafter" qualified for a 20 percent rebate from the French government and a received a 25 percent tax credit from the British government after certain scenes were filmed in each of the countries.
Eastwood's "Flags Of Our Fathers" also benefited from a 20 percent incentive package for filming in Iceland. Along with an explainer on the country's tax credit for filmmakers, Iceland's Film Commission features a quote from Eastwood on its website touting the benefits of filming in the country:
"Flying in over the black sand beaches and lava fields, I could see that Iceland had the rugged and unusual look we needed for our film, 'Flags Of Our Fathers.' I soon learned that Iceland also has friendly, hard-working people with a refreshing can-do spirit. The open roads and undisturbed countryside remind me of the way America was fifty years ago. With such gorgeous scenery, delicious fish and even golf, Iceland made for a terrific filming location," Eastwood said.
Romney is familiar with the kinds of tax breaks being used by film directors like Eastwood. As Massachusetts governor, he signed legislation offering an array of tax breaks aimed at attracting major films to his state. The Patriot Ledger reported in December 2005 that, because of the new package, a single film production could receive up to $7 million in tax credits, making Massachusetts "among the five most generous states in the country" at the time.
The Massachusetts Department of Revenue later reported that $19.1 million in tax credits were generated in fiscal 2006 alone.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/30/clint-eastwood-taxes-credits_n_1845054.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular 

30 August 2012

Rick Santorum says that when his grandfather arrived in the U.S., “there were no government benefits for immigrants" 29AUG12

MORE lies and propaganda from the gop / tea-bagger convention in Tampa, this time spewing from the mouth of that consummate liar rick santorum. He, like rep paul ryan, is a Catholic, and so I have to ask the same question; that is, when rick santorum goes to confession will he list these lies among his sins?
The Truth-O-Meter Says:
Santorum

When his grandfather arrived in the United States, "there were no government benefits for immigrants."

Rick Santorum on Tuesday, August 28th, 2012 in a speech at the Republican National Convention in Tampa

Rick Santorum says that when his grandfather arrived in the U.S., “there were no government benefits for immigrants"

During a speech to the Republican National Convention in Tampa, former presidential candidate Rick Santorum evoked the America his father found when he arrived on these shores as an immigrant in the 1920s.

"In 1923, there were no government benefits for immigrants, except one: Freedom!" Santorum said.

This is close to a claim by Santorum that made in a Feb. 29, 2012, speech near Knoxville, Tenn., he said that during that era "there were no government benefits," which earned a False on the Truth-O-Meter.

So we will re-evaluate it here, though we won’t consider the issue of "freedom," which we believe is too vague to be fact-checked.

When we first looked at this question, we found there were two major sources of payments to individuals prior to 1925 -- veterans benefits and workers' compensation.

Veterans benefits. The federal government began funding benefits for Civil War veterans in 1862, initially for those who had been injured and then, progressively, to wider and wider groups of those who had served. In 1904 President Theodore Roosevelt signed an order defining "disability" to include old age, as long as the beneficiary had at least 90 days of service and an honorable discharge.

University of Arizona economist Price V. Fishback wrote that "roughly 40 to 48 percent of the elderly in the North and Midwest in the early 1900s were receiving pensions" through the system. Peter Blanck and Chen Song wrote in a 2003 paper in the William and Mary Law Review that "at its height in the 1890s, the (Union veteran) pension scheme consumed almost half of the federal budget and was intimately linked to the Republican Party's strategy to maintain the soldier vote and hold the White House."

Worker compensation. A federal worker-compensation law to help civilian government workers injured or made sick on the job was adopted in 1908, according to a history on the Social Security Administration website. Starting in 1911, states began passing such laws, and by 1929, laws were in effect in all but four states.

While these are the clearest examples that run counter to Santorum’s claim, there are a few other efforts worth noting.

Local government aid to the poor. During the period Santorum is talking about, local governments were responsible for providing benefits to the poor, Fishback told PolitiFact. These payments tended to be modest. Fishback cited a study by Brendan Livingston of Rowan University that looked at welfare policies in Massachusetts -- generally considered the most generous state in the first decades of the 20th century -- and found that local governments were spending an amount equivalent to about 0.5 percent to 1 percent of all income earned by state residents on relief for the poor. Private charities were spending at about twice that rate.

By 1925, most states also had "mothers' pensions" on the books, which allowed widows to raise their children without having to put them in orphanages, according to Fishback’s paper. By then, a handful of states also had means-tested pensions for the elderly, and a sizable number had pensions for the blind. And states or municipalities often operated mental hospitals, old-age homes, orphanages and general hospitals, all for the public benefit.

Schools and universities. While education isn’t a direct payment to individuals, it’s worth pointing out that they represented a government-provided benefit in kind. "Primary and secondary education were already overwhelmingly paid for by taxes from the late 1800s on," said Peter Lindert, an economist at the University of California at Davis.

Meanwhile, higher education had land-grant subsidies -- federally backed institutions dating back to the Morrill Land-Grant Acts of 1862 and 1890. "Because they were public institutions, tuition was cheaper on account of public subsidies," said Gary Gerstle, a historian and political scientist at Vanderbilt University. "This was clearly a government benefit."

Health funding for mothers and newborns. In 1921, President Warren G. Harding signed the Sheppard-Towner Maternity and Infancy Protection Act, which gave states matching federal funds to build and operate prenatal and child health care centers.

All told, by 1922, various expenditures for public benefits amounted to 6.8 percent of expenditures by the three levels of government combined. Santorum does have a point that social welfare spending by 1925 was relatively small compared to what it would ultimately become, because two major programs, Social Security and Medicare, didn't start until later.

It’s worth noting that the specific individual Santorum cited -- his newly arrived immigrant grandfather -- wouldn’t have directly benefited from military pensions or a land-grant college upon his arrival on these shores, though other immigrants, such as those who arrived in time to serve in previous wars, could have. Experts contacted for this story said they were not aware that the benefits provided were restricted only to the native-born.

In the meantime, his ability to collect worker compensation would have depended on what state he lived in upon his arrival. Similarly, the local aid to the poor he would have qualified for would have varied significantly depending on what city or county he lived in, and it would have been small by the standards of later decades. Still, it was not zero, as Santorum said.

Our ruling

Contrary to Santorum’s claim, millions of Americans in the 1920s would have either qualified for benefits directly, such as payments to veterans, or have been protected by work
ers' compensation laws that provided benefits to those who became disabled by their jobs. And state and local governments had the longstanding role of paying support to people who were disabled or indigent. This provides a much more complex picture than Santorum is painting. We rate his statement False.
About this statement:
Published: Wednesday, August 29th, 2012 at 7:30 p.m.
Subjects: Welfare
Sources:
Rick Santorum, speech at the Republican National Convention in Tampa, Aug. 28, 2012

Knoxville News Sentinel, Rick Santorum speech at Temple Baptist Church in Powell, Tenn., Feb. 29, 2012 (26.8 MB audio file)

Statistical Abstract of the United States, Federal, State and Local Expenditures by Function, 1902-1970

U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Table 2.1. Personal Income and Its Disposition, accessed Mar. 5, 2012

Social Security Administration, "Historical Development," accessed Mar. 5, 2012

Price V. Fishback, "Social Expenditures in the United States and the Nordic Countries: 1900-2003," August 2009

Peter Blanck and Chen Song, "’Never Forget What They Did Here’: Civil War Pensions for Gettysburg Union Army Veterans and Disability in Nineteenth-Century America," William & Mary Law Review, 2003

Gregory P. Guyton, "A Brief History of Workers' Compensation" (article in Iowa Orthopedic Journal), 1999

University of Virginia Miller Center, "Harding Signs Sheppard-Towner Act–November 23, 1921," accessed Mar. 6, 2012

PolitiFact, "Rick Santorum charts explosion of federal entitlement spending since 1958," Feb. 23, 2012

PolitiFact, "Santorum says when his grandfather came to the U.S. in 1925, 'there were no government benefits,'" March 6, 2012

Email interview with Eugene Steuerle, fellow with the Urban Institute, Mar. 5, 2012

Email interview with Caleb Quackenbush, research assistant with the Urban Institute, Mar. 5, 2012

Email interview with Michael B. Katz, historian at the University of Pennsylvania, Mar. 5, 2012

Email interview with Peter Lindert, economist at the University of California at Davis, Mar. 5, 2012

Email interview with Price V. Fishback, economist with the University of Arizona, Mar. 5, 2012

Email interview with Henry Aaron, economist at the Brookings Institution, Mar. 5, 2012

Email interview with Gary Burtless, economist at the Brookings Institution, Mar. 5, 2012

Email interview with Dean Baker, economist with the Center for Economic and Policy Research, Mar. 5, 2012

Email interview with Arloc Sherman, economist at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Mar. 5, 2012

Email interview with Gary Gerstle, professor of history and political science at Vanderbilt University, Mar. 6, 2012

Email interview with Douglas J. Besharov, public policy professor at the University of Maryland, Mar. 5, 2012 and Aug. 29, 2012

Email interview with Timothy M. Smeeding, director of the Institute for Research on Poverty at the Robert M. La Follette School of Public Affairs at the University of Wisconsin, Mar. 5, 2012 and Aug. 29, 2012

Written by: Louis Jacobson
Researched by: Louis Jacobson
Edited by: Bridget Hall Grumet
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/aug/29/rick-santorum/rick-santorum-says-when-his-grandfather-arrived-us/

Fact Checkers Say Some Of Ryan's Claims Don't Add Up 30AUG12 &Paul Ryan said President Obama “funneled” $716 billion out of Medicare “at the expense of the elderly.” 29AUG12

paul ryan's speech at the gop / tea-bagger convention is full of lies, not a big surprise, but one has to wonder if, as a Catholic, he will list these lies as a some of his sins when he goes to confession......
Rep. Paul Ryan stretched some truths Wednesday night when he accepted the Republican Party's 2012 vice presidential nomination, according to the fact checkers who parse politicians' words for news outlets and independent watchdogs:
FactCheck.org found several problems with what Ryan said. Among them: Ryan "accused President Obama's health care law of funneling money away from Medicare 'at the expense of the elderly.' In fact, Medicare's chief actuary says the law 'substantially improves' the system's finances, and Ryan himself has embraced the same savings."
FactCheck also notes that Ryan "accused Obama of doing "exactly nothing" about recommendations of a bipartisan deficit commission — which Ryan himself helped scuttle."
— The Wisconsin congressman earned a "false" rating from PolitiFact.com on one statement. He got it for noting that then-candidate Barack Obama told the people of Janesville, Wis. (Ryan's home town) that the GM plant there would be open another 100 years if the government gave it the right support. "That plant didn't last another year," Ryan said, implying that Obama broke a promise. Ryan didn't say that the plant actually closed in 2008, before Obama took office.
— Ryan "took some factual shortcuts," The Associated Press says. For instance, Ryan said the economic stimulus package passed in the early days of the Obama administration "was a case of political patronage, corporate welfare and cronyism at their worst. You, the working men and women of this country, were cut out of the deal."
The AP says that: "Ryan himself asked for stimulus funds shortly after Congress approved the $800 billion plan, known as the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Ryan's pleas to federal agencies included letters to Energy Secretary Steven Chu and Labor Secretary Hilda Solis seeking stimulus grant money for two Wisconsin energy conservation companies."
— And as for the recurring "we built it" theme of the convention and Republicans' insistence that Obama doesn't think business people deserve credit for their successes — a line of attack Ryan returned to — The Washington Post's Fact Checker has now given the GOP "four Pinocchios" on that one.
When the president said "you didn't build that," the Post has concluded, he appeared "to be making the unremarkable point that companies and entrepreneurs often benefit in some way from taxpayer support for roads, education and so forth. In other words, he [was] trying to make the case for higher taxes, and for why he believes the rich should pay more, which as we noted is part of a long Democratic tradition. He just did not put it very eloquently."
http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2012/08/30/160301854/fact-checkers-say-some-of-ryans-claims-dont-add-up?ft=1&f=139482413
The Truth-O-Meter Says:
Ryan

President Obama "funneled" $716 billion out of Medicare "at the expense of the elderly."

Paul Ryan on Wednesday, August 29th, 2012 in a speech at the Republican National Convention

Paul Ryan said President Obama “funneled” $716 billion out of Medicare “at the expense of the elderly.”

Vice presidential nominee Paul Ryan has made some of his sharpest attacks yet on Barack Obama’s health care law, calling the law "the greatest threat to Medicare."

Ryan himself advocates a plan to give voucher-like credits to seniors, so they can shop for a private plan or choose a traditional Medicare option. That plan has come under withering attack from Democrats.

Ryan fired back Aug. 29 during his acceptance speech at the at the Republican National Convention in Tampa.

"The biggest, coldest power play of all in Obamacare came at the expense of the elderly," Ryan said. "You see, even with all the hidden taxes to pay for the health care takeover, even with a new law and new taxes on nearly a million small businesses, the planners in Washington still didn’t have enough money. They needed more. They needed hundreds of billions more.

"So, they just took it all away from Medicare, $716 billion, funneled out of Medicare by President Obama. An obligation we have to our parents and grandparents is being sacrificed, all to pay for a new entitlement we didn’t even ask for. The greatest threat to Medicare is Obamacare, and we’re going to stop it."

Ryan’s comments are highly misleading. Neither Obama nor his health care law literally cut funding from the Medicare program’s budget. Still, the number has a slight basis in fact.

The health care law instituted a number of changes to try to bring down future health care costs in the program. The total anticipated savings comes to $716 billion over the next 10 years, as determined by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

We should note that both parties agree Medicare spending is increasing too fast as baby boomers retire and medical costs increase. The government needs to find savings so those costs don’t overwhelm the federal budget in the future.

So, yes, Obama’s law did find $716 billion in spending reductions. They were mainly aimed at insurance companies and hospitals, not beneficiaries. The law made significant reductions to Medicare Advantage, a subset of Medicare plans run by private insurers. Medicare Advantage was started under President George W. Bush, and the idea was that competition among the private insurers would reduce costs. But the plans have actually cost the government more than traditional Medicare. The health care law scales back the payments to private insurers.
  
Hospitals, too, will be paid less if they have too many re-admissions, or if they fail to meet other new benchmarks for patient care.
  
Obama and fellow Democrats say the intention is to protect beneficiaries' coverage while forcing health care providers to become more efficient. Even with the health care law’s cost-saving measures, the overall Medicare budget is still projected to go up for the foreseeable future.

There is a connection between the Medicare cost savings and the health care law. At the time the health care law was being finalized, Democrats said it was important to them that the new law not add to the deficit. So the reductions in Medicare spending were counted against the health care law’s new spending.

We should point out that some new spending is within the Medicare program, such as increasing coverage for prescription drugs and offering preventive care with no out-of-pocket costs.
  
More significantly, though, the law moves to cover the uninsured, by giving them tax credits to buy private insurance. It also expands Medicaid, the state insurance program for the poor. The savings from Medicare offset that spending.
  
The health law also imposes new taxes, primarily on the wealthy and on the health care industry. That, too, offsets the new spending.

Our ruling

Ryan said Obama "funneled" $716 billion out of Medicare "at the expense of the elderly." This gives a very misleading impression.

In fact, the law limits payments to health care providers and insurers to try to reduce the rapid growth of future Medicare spending. Lawmakers said they hoped the measures would improve care and efficiency. Those savings, spread out over the next 10 years, are then used to offset costs created by the law (especially coverage for the uninsured) so that the overall law doesn't add to the deficit. Ryan’s statement is exaggerated and we rate it Mostly False.
About this statement:
Published: Wednesday, August 29th, 2012 at 11:27 p.m.
Subjects: Federal Budget, Medicare
Sources:
Republican National Convention, remarks by Paul Ryan, Aug. 29, 2012

PolitiFact, Romney says Obama 'cuts' $716B from Medicare to pay for Obamacare, Aug. 20, 2012

Congressional Budget Office, Letter to the Honorable John Boehner providing an estimate for H.R. 6079, the Repeal of Obamacare Act, July 24, 2012
          
Congressional Budget Office, CBO's Analysis of the Major Health Care Legislation Enacted in March 2010, March 30, 2011
          
Congressional Budget Office, H.R. 2, Repealing the Job-Killing Health Care Law Act, February 18, 2011
          
Congressional Budget Office, The Long-Term Budgetary Impact of Paths for Federal Revenues and Spending Specified by Chairman Ryan, March 20, 2012
          
PolitiFact, "Medicare 'cuts' in the health care law will hurt seniors, says 60 Plus Association," Sept. 20, 2010
  
The Kaiser Family Foundation, Health Reform and Medicare: Overview of Key Provisions, July 2010

PolitiFact, "$500 billion from Medicare for Obamacare, Mitt Romney says," June 16, 2011


Written by: Angie Drobnic Holan
Researched by: Angie Drobnic Holan
Edited by: Bridget Hall Grumethttp://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/aug/29/paul-ryan/paul-ryan-said-president-obama-funneled-716-billio/

The 14 Most Important Sex Ads Of The Republican National Convention 24AUG12

OH those repiglicans and tea-baggers!!!!! 
“Let's compare PAC's!” Is Tampa America's sketchiest city?
1.

2. "Slaves Wanted"

"Slaves Wanted"
3.

4. Brazilian escort. "RNC Arm Candy."

Brazilian escort. "RNC Arm Candy."
5.
6.
7.

8. Escort offers "RNC Specials."

Escort offers "RNC Specials."
9.
10.

11. "Don't miss out"

"Don't miss out"
12.
13.
14.

Juan Williams: Ann Romney Looks "Like A Corporate Wife," Hard For Me To Believe She Struggled 28AUG12

JUAN Williams' comments on Queen ann romney....tell it like it is Juan!!!
The Fox commentator said tonight — in remarks that are sure to draw comparisons from conservatives to Hilary Rosen's snipe that Ann Romney “didn't work a day in her life” — that Ann Romney “looks to me like a corporate wife. The stories she told about struggles are hard for me to believe. I mean, she's a very rich women.”

Romney party yacht ‘Cracker Bay’ flies Cayman Islands flag in Tampa & Cap'n Mitt and the Pirates of Cracker Bay 29AUG12 & 7SEP12

FLAUNTING his wealth and his off shore tax haven bank accounts mitt romney's yacht "cracker bay", a name reflecting mitt's sense of humor referencing all us common people, flies the flag of the Cayman Islands while in Tampa. Those attending the romney fund raiser on board didn't seem to have any problem with handing over their money to purchase their presidential candidate on board his foreign flagged boat, offering proof of whose interest he will represent if elected. 
By David Edwards
Print
Romney campaign parties on "Cracker Island" yacht with Cayman Islands flag (Flickr/Daniel Cornwall)
Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney’s campaign on Wednesday partied with wealthy donors on a 150-foot yacht that flies the flag of the Cayman Islands, according to an ABC News report.
Members of the Romney Victory Council, who have each raised more than $1 million for the candidate, mingled with Romney’s brother, Scott, and other relatives in Tampa aboard the luxury yacht “Cracker Bay.”
While they waited outside the unadvertised event, ABC News snapped photos of the Cayman Islands civil ensign flag flying on the yacht’s stern.
Gov. Bob McDonnell (R-VA) was reportedly scheduled to speak to the more than 50 people attending.
“It was a really nice event,” billionaire energy industry executive Wilbur Ross told the network. “These are good supporters.”
Romney came under fire earlier this year when it was revealed that he had millions stashed in the Cayman Islands, a notorious tax haven. In August, Vanity Fair reported that Romney still had a personal stake in at least 12 of Bain Capital’s Cayman Island funds, worth up to $30 million.
The candidate recently insisted to Fox News host Chris Wallace that “there was no reduction — not one dollar reduction — in taxes by virtue of having an account in Switzerland or a Cayman Islands investment.”
“I think it’s ironic they do this aboard a yacht that doesn’t even pay its taxes,” a woman who lives at the marina where Cracker Bay is moored told ABC News.
Watch this video from ABC News, broadcast Aug. 29, 2012.
Photo: Flickr/Daniel Cornwall]

[Correction: An earlier version of the report incorrectly identified Fox News host Chris Wallace]
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/08/29/romney-party-yacht-cracker-bay-flies-cayman-islands-flag-in-tampa/ 

Cap'n Mitt and the Pirates of Cracker Bay


Ever since humans first took to the sea, pirates have inexplicably vanished and reappeared along our coasts and waterways.  Who were those mysterious figures who appeared along the mist-shrouded docks and beaches of Tampa Bay during last week's Republican Convention?  While all eyes were on the Democrats, we decided to find out.
Pirates are often portrayed as a festive lot, so our investigation began with an ABC News report of an event where corporate campaign donors were lavishly entertained by The Commodores, whose hit "Brick House" captivated 70's-era dancers with its hypnotic chorus --
Chick-a-maw, chick-a-maw, chick-a-maw-maw,
Chick-a-maw, chick-a-maw, chick-a-MAW-maw!
-- and the extra syllables and syncopated pauses added to selected word:"She's a ba-rick" --(pause) -- "house/she's mighty mighty just lettin' it all hang out ....
It is a wondrous thing to watch rich white people getting down -- trust me, I know -- and many a groove thing was undoubtedly shaken at the Commodores event, where Sen. John Cornyn of Texas thanked donors from Blue Cross Blue Shield, AFLAC, and AT&T. Each has financial interests affected by the law known as "Obamacare."
But boogieing and piracy are not the same thing, so our search continued. Elsewhere in Tampa a conservative group called the American Access Network sold access to elected officials "advertised the chance to mingle with members of Congress and senior staff at an arena skybox overlooking the convention floor for $30,000," according to ABC. And even better offers were available:
"Full access to the group's intimate luncheons and hot ticket concerts were open to their biggest supporters -- those who gave $250,000."
As the Commodores might say: Yeeowww!
Unethical? Sure. But piracy? We weren't sure. The trail grew warmer when we learned about the yacht party thrown by a Florida developer for "bundlers" who had raised $1 million or more for Mitt Romney's campaign.  ABC reports that more than fifty people were entertained aboard the Cracker Bay, a yacht flying the ensign of the Cayman Islands, where the American-owned vessel was registered.
As the astute reader may have already noted, the boat shares its nationality with a big chunk of Mitt Romney's money.
We wondered at the use of the name "Cracker," a derisive Southern term for white males, since that appeared to be the primary's demographic group represented at these affairs. Were these wealthy men mocking their poorer counterparts, who are sometimes disparaged with the term? But another GOP patron professed ignorance when reached aboard his boat, the SS Peckerwood.
"We let the help name our boats," he explained.  
In true piratical fashion, guests aboard the Cracker Bay attempted to conceal their identity, in this case by covering up their name tags as they boarded the boat. But reporters observed  Texas oil heir Charlie Moncrief, whose family saga would put Dallas to shame.
Another guest was ultra-right real estate investor Melvin Sembler, who earned notoriety for running a sadistic and exploitative string of youth "rehabs."  It would ruin the lighthearted tone of this piece to describe the horrors which STRAIGHT, Inc. inflicted on young people, so we'll leave the  horrifying details to Alternet and the Institute for Policy Studies instead.
Self-respecting pirates would be ashamed to be associated with the likes of Mel Sembler, who bought himself the ambassadorships to Australia and Nauru under George H. W. Bush and the Italian ambassadorship under George W. Bush. Which ambassadorship might Sembler purchase under a Romney Administration? The U.N.? The moon?
Then there's Cracker Bay "captain" Gary Morse. Morse owns the development company behind "The Villages," a string of "master-planned" retirement communities in Florida.   Florida's unusual "special taxing district" regulations allow private corporations like Disney to usurp government functions, including taxation, while exempting themselves from most government regulations. (Mystery writer Carl Hiassen has written a nonfiction book called Team Rodent: How Disney Devours the World which addresses Disney's misuse of these laws).
"The Villages" are governed by "Community Development Districts" -- most of which are controlled by Morse himself. From a comprehensive and compelling Bloomberg report:
Morse controls almost every facet of life at the Villages... On a 33-square-mile parcel... he's built and sold more than 44,000 homes... created 39 golf courses and developed 4.5 million square feet of commercial space, including two hotels, 60 restaurants and two movie theaters... Morse owns the local newspaper, a television channel and an AM radio station... (his) commercials have been fixtures on the Golf Channel. His bank lends to retirees fleeing south; his insurance company provides them coverage. He even gets paid to pick up the trash and organize tee times.
It's like something out of The Prisoner, Patrick McGoohan's surrealistic 1960s television series on the BBC. "Be seeing you!"  How does Morse do it?  Bloomberg explains: "Morse... has become one of America's wealthiest real estate tycoons with the help of tax-exempt municipal bonds issued by special government entities he's created to fund the expansion of the Villages."
Traditional pirates operate outside government control, often in self-governed areas which anarchy theorists sometimes describe with the acronym "TAZ" (for "Temporary Autonomous Zone").  But if pirates have typically been "non-state actors," Morse hijacks government itself and exploits them to expand his own wealth.  In other words, he's a lot like Mitt Romney and other wealthy Republicans: They gripe about the cost of government, even as they exploit it to enrich themselves at public expense.
"Special taxing districts" are a microcosm of the para-piratical dystopia Republicans would create for the entire country, where corporate rule is supreme and democracy is as faint a memory as oceangoing corsairs.
Bloomberg reports that Morse's empire includes "four jet planes -- including a 21-seat Dassault Falcon 900 and two 22-seat Dassault Mystere-Falcon 50s, which can fly 3,623 miles without refueling." That sounds like the makings of a fleet.  Was there a secret global flotilla of conservative bandit ships ringing the world's oceans?  To help us find out, local informants arranged a secret meeting with a figure known to us only as "Cap'n Mitt." In the minutes just before dawn, a schooner emerged as if by magic from the mists off Tampa Bay.
The pirate ship's rigging creaked in the salty breezes as an ageless figure, his ample hair and square jaw strangely familiar beneath his eyepatch and sailor's hat, peered at us from the fog-shrouded deck.
"Are you a Republican?" we asked him. "Aye," he said tersely. From the crow's nest high above us, a dog barked. "But are you a pirate?"  He chuckled.  "Well, we don't run from government, we own it. But what do Republicans do then?" he asked rhetorically. "We privatize public services." I waited. "And what's another word for 'pirate'?" He paused for dramatic effect.
"'Privateer,'" he answered himself with a smirk.

"Is the Cracker Bay part of your fleet?" He nodded.
"What part of the Republican Platform appeals to the rich men who fly your flag?" we asked.  "Is it the return to the lawless days of deregulation?" He chuckled. "That pleases them mightily," he said.  "What about taking away government agencies' ability to protect people from corporate predators?"  He smiled. "Aye," he said, "that does too."
"But how do you explain this piracy to the voters?"
He chuckled, then cast off for deep waters. The ghostly ship was already fading back into the mist-shrouded deep as he said "Everybody loves a party." He smiled enigmatically. "So we pretend they're invited to ours." I shouted my final words as the ship began to vanish into the mist: "But they're not!  That's  obvious by now! What can you possibly say to sell a program like that?"

The now-invisible buccaneer chuckled. "With enough money and media power behind me, all I have to say is ... "  The unseen freebooter's voice echoed across the fog-shrouded waves: "... chick  a maw, chick a maw maw! Yeoww!"
And with that his vessel disappeared, never again to be seen by human eyes or revealed by campaign disclosure laws.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rj-eskow/capn-mitt-and-the-pirates_b_1866158.html?utm_source=Alert-blogger&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Email%2BNotifications

11 GOP convention speakers who actually ‘didn’t build that’ 28AUG12

CONTINUING lies, deception, misinformation, propaganda and hypocrisy from the gop / tea-baggers who claim to detest and despise the federal government, government spending (in someone else's district) and who continue to misrepresent Pres Obama's comments about America's social contract. Here are 11 gop / tea-bagger hypocrites who are speaking at their convention in Tampa with examples of their soliciting, supporting and taking credit for federal and state tax dollars being spent in their districts supporting the public and private sectors....
 
Rep. Pete Sessions (R-TX) via republicanconference / Flickr
 
Despite the fact that the Republican National Convention is held in a stadium that was financed with $86 million in public funds, the theme this year is “We built this!”
The theme is designed to be an affront to President Barack Obama’s supposed claim that those with successful businesses don’t deserve credit. The Romney campaign has dug in with an attack ad that says Obama’s message to business owners is “you didn’t build that,” despite the full context of the quote, which he used in a Virginia speech in July.
“If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help,” Obama explained. “There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business — you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen.”
And the theme has been taken to heart by numerous candidates and delegates invited to speak at the convention. Looking at the prepared remarks for Tuesday alone, a number of speakers skipped over ways that their accomplishments had been supported by the government.
1) Rep. Pete Sessions of Texas, when touting this Congress’ record of “implementing free enterprise policies that create jobs, cutting spending and repealing Obamacare,” failed to mention that — despite his very public opposition to the American Recovery Act in 2009, he secretly requested $81 million in stimulus money from Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood.
2) When Host Committee Chairman Al Austin thanked attendees for stimulating the Tampa Bay economy with the Republican National Convention, he failed to mention the $50 million federal grant provided to make the convention possible. An estimated $2.7 million of that grant went to spending on security alone.
3) Ricky Gill , a Republican Candidate for Congress for California’s 9th district, called himself “a proud son of California’s San Joaquin Valley.” The valley is a robust farming community in central California, which, in addition being a recipient of some of the billions in farm subsidies that framing communities receive annually, has been dealing with a desperate drought. Republicans on the Natural Resources Committee in the House put forth legislation “to prevent future California man-made droughts” through public allocation of water to the valley.
4) Rep. Tim Griffin, representing the 2nd congressional district in Arkansas, said that a private company in his district awaits the building of the Keystone pipeline, a project that has even been opposed by Republicans because of it’s hefty $260 billion estimated price tag. “In Little Rock, we have a company with over 500 miles of pipe ready for the Keystone pipeline – but that pipe is sitting in a stack,” and will be, apparently until the federal funding comes through.
5) Rep. Francisco Canseco from Texas touted the fact that his district included “800 miles of U.S.-Mexico border,” which is secured by the U.S. Border Patrol, which has a workforce of nearly 20,000 employed directly by the federal government. The size of the Border Patrol has doubled since 2004. (Incidentally, Canseco isn’t so friendly with every U.S. security agency, since he claims to have had an intimate encounter with the Transportation Security Administration earlier this year.)
6) Tampa Mayor Bob Buckhorn not only touted the city’s immigrant population — even though at least 30 percent of immigrant-led households in Florida participate in at least one major welfare program — but also touted the city’s home to MacDill Air Force Base, which faced a 7 percent cut this year to its $10.5 billion annual budget.
7) Keith Rothfus, running for Congress in Pennsylvania’s 12th district, said he was a cancer survivor, has been a beneficiary of some of the research subsidized by the National Cancer Institute, which receives some $5 billion annually from the federal government. The Romney-Ryan budget proposes cuts to the funding of cancer research.
8) Andy Barr, running for Kentucky’s 6th district in Kentucky, cited Toyota’s “7,000 jobs in Georgetown, Kentucky,” made possible in part by $6.5 billion in tax incentives provided by the Kentucky Business Investment program, a state-funded program.
9) Oklahoma City Mayor Mick Cornett admitted that there’s “a role for Washington in addressing our city’s critical infrastructure needs,” but cited the fact that his city “was recently named as the most entrepreneurial city in the country, with the most start-ups per capita.” That could be in part due to the $30 billion in federal grant money allocated by the Oklahoma City Small Business Administration district office.
10) Lisa Stickan, chair of the Young Republicans, studied law at Cleveland State University, a public university that received some $210 million annually from the state until 2010, when a Republican-legislature cut 34 percent of its budget. Stickan probably would have found paying for college difficult without federally funded student loans and/or grants, or a tax-free college savings plan.
11) Utah’s Rep. Jason Chaffetz touted a “$500,000 grant under the Small Community Air Service Development Program” in 2010 given by the U.S. Department of Transportation, but didn’t mention that when he applauded the generations who “quietly rolled up their sleeves and built a stronger, more prosperous nation. The government didn’t build it. They built it.”
But it seems that those triumphs wouldn’t have been possible without help from the government.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/08/28/11-gop-convention-speakers-who-actually-didnt-build-that/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story%29