NORTON META TAG

Showing posts with label bigotry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bigotry. Show all posts

30 August 2026

VIDEO & REPORT: Three Confederate statues removed from Richmond’s Capitol Square 28AUG26 by: Clare Gehlich Posted: Aug 28, 2026 / 11:23 AM EDT Updated: Aug 28, 2026 / 02:21 PM EDT


UPDATED As Military Vet I Felt Unwelcome When Rebel Flag Got Big Ovation at Vets Day Parade in Melbourne, FL 11NOV15

THE only people upset about these statues being removed are neo-nazi traitors, bigots, racist and "christian" nationalist. No real American supports the public display of statues of traitors who tried to destroy our nation. These statues of confederate military and political traitors are as offensive as if a statue of emperor hirohito was erected at Pearl Harbor, a statue of hitler was erected at the American cemetery at the D Day beaches at Normandy, statues of osama bin laden and the 9/11 terrorist were erected at the New York City 9/11 Memorial, the Pentagon and the Flight 93 Memorial in Shanksville, PA and if a statue of that shitty diaper wearing, neo-nazi, fascist, narcissistic, psychopathic, sociopathic, Vietnam War draft dodging c-i-c NOT MY president drumpf/trump was erected at the Vietnam War Memorial in Washington, DC. Video from WTRV CBS6 and  article from WRIC ABC8.....

Confederate statues removed from Capitol Square in Richmond

Aug 28, 2026 Three Confederate statues are being removed from Capitol Square in Richmond and donated to the Shenandoah Battlefield Foundation as part of a state-approved plan.

Three Confederate statues removed from Richmond’s Capitol Square

 by: Clare Gehlich 

 Posted: Aug 28, 2026 / 11:23 AM EDT  Updated: Aug 28, 2026 / 02:21 PM EDT

RICHMOND, Va. (WRIC) — Three Confederate statues were removed from Richmond’s Capitol Square on Friday, according to the state.

The Department of General Services (DGS) has been directed to remove all three Confederate monuments and memorials from Capitol Square on Friday, Aug. 28, including one of Confederate General Stonewall Jackson, one of Gov. William “Extra Billy” Smith, a former Confederate general and another of Confederate Dr. Hunter Holmes McGuire.

A spokesperson with the DGS said the action is in accordance with a budget item passed by the General Assembly.

The removal of said statues has been mired in controversy due to history, public veneration and modern political priorities.

(Photo: Tyler Englander/8News)

Sen. Adam Ebbin (D-Alexandria), who sponsored a bill to remove all three statues from the State Capitol, said it’s embarrassing to have constituents walk by statues honoring those associated with the Confederacy.

State Sen. Mike Jones (D-Richmond) told 8News the removal is necessary to ensure the Capitol grounds reflect the values of the commonwealth.

“I remembered seeing white only, colored only pictures in my mother’s scrapbook, and so to have that as a visual and then for these things to remain to remind this area of what took place, I think it’s wrong,” he said. “Put ’em in a museum, put a greater historical context around them.” 

He added, “We have a right to say this is how we wish to be seen as a commonwealth and even as a city, that doesn’t match up with who we are and where we are in this season and where I hope we’re going as a country and a commonwealth.”

Opponents, including Republican leaders such as Senate Minority Leader Ryan McDougle (R-Hanover), argue that spending time and state funds on statue removal distracts lawmakers from pressing economic issues like inflation and the cost of living.

8News reached out to Republican House Minority Leader Terry Kilgore’s office for this story, but never received a statement.

The Shenandoah Valley Battlefields Foundation gifted these statues to the commonwealth, the department said. The foundation confirmed Friday that it is working with the DGS to receive the monuments being removed.

The monuments will be relocated to appropriate battlefield sites within the Shenandoah Valley and the foundation said it will assume stewardship of the monuments as part of its ongoing mission to “preserve and interpret Virginia’s historic landscapes and cultural resources.”

Keven Walker, CEO of the Shenandoah Valley Battlefields Foundation, shared the following statement with 8News, which can be read as follows:

“Preservation is more about the future than the past, and ensuring the preservation of the Capitol Square monuments is a part of that clear vision. At the core of all we do is the belief that our shared history can unite the people of our nation; that there is strength and inspiration for our own times to be found in the struggles of the past.”

Ebbin said the cost of removing the three statues is around $150,000.

06 June 2026

Minnesota Republicans Hold Moment of Silence for Ex-Officer Convicted of Murder 1JUN26

 


THIS is disgusting but not surprising considering this is the party that stands by a convicted felon, a sexual predator and a child rapist as their but NOT MY pres drumpf/trump. There will be some of this neo-nazi fascist "christian" nationalist authoritarian lot who will claim they do not support this action by the Minnesota gop/guardians of prejudice-republican party, but if they remain members of and or candidates of the party they are confirming their complicity and support of hate, prejudice, bigotry, racism, police violence, fascism and fear mongering. From the New York Times.....

Minnesota Republicans Hold Moment of Silence for Ex-Officer Convicted of Murder


Delegates to the Minnesota Republican Party’s convention voted to hold a moment of silence for Derek Chauvin, who was convicted of murdering George Floyd.


Delegates to the Minnesota Republican Party’s convention held a moment of silence over the weekend for Derek Chauvin, a former Minneapolis police officer, six years after he murdered George Floyd and touched off a national reckoning over policing and race.

The decision brought searing criticism from Democrats, who accused the Republicans of disrespecting the courts and Mr. Floyd’s memory. In recent years, some conservatives have sought to reshape the narrative around Mr. Floyd’s killing and have pushed President Trump to pardon Mr. Chauvin for his federal conviction.

Christopher Rocco, a delegate from St. Paul who goes by the name Rocco, proposed the moment of silence on Saturday morning, describing Mr. Chauvin to his fellow delegates as someone “who should get a state retrial, who should get a federal pardon.” Audio of the exchange was recorded by The Minnesota Reformer, a local news outlet.

When a voice vote was held on a motion for a moment of silence or prayer, many people in the room could be heard yelling aye. The nays were far quieter.

“It wasn’t even close,” said State Representative Danny Nadeau, who presided over that portion of the convention, where about 2,300 delegates gathered in Duluth to make endorsements in state elections.

Mr. Rocco said he had decided to seek recognition of Mr. Chauvin after coming to the conclusion that the former officer had not received a fair trial in state court.

Mr. Rocco said that he did not have any personal connection to Mr. Chauvin, and that no candidate or member of the Republican Party’s leadership had asked him to make the motion.

“I made that decision to do that, to stand up for someone who doesn’t have the ability to stand up for himself anymore — someone who, in my opinion, faced injustice,” Mr. Rocco said in a phone interview.

Mr. Nadeau said he chose to make the moment of silence last only a few seconds, “the minimum amount necessary.” Before starting the session that morning, he said he had told Mr. Rocco that he would prefer he not pursue a moment of silence.

“It’s not a good look, in my opinion,” said Mr. Nadeau, whose district is in suburban Minneapolis.

Democrats noted that the decision to recognize Mr. Chauvin came within days of the anniversary of Mr. Floyd’s death.

“They cannot run from this,” said the Minnesota attorney general, Keith Ellison, a Democrat who prosecuted Mr. Chauvin in state court in 2021. “They either are OK with what happened or they’re going to denounce it. I haven’t seen one person denounce it. I haven’t seen one person say, ‘That was a bad, ugly thing.’”

Ben Crump and Antonio Romanucci, lawyers who represented the Floyd family, called the moment of silence “disgusting.”

“They cannot run from this,” said the Minnesota attorney general, Keith Ellison, a Democrat who prosecuted Mr. Chauvin in state court in 2021. “They either are OK with what happened or they’re going to denounce it. I haven’t seen one person denounce it. I haven’t seen one person say, ‘That was a bad, ugly thing.’”

Ben Crump and Antonio Romanucci, lawyers who represented the Floyd family, called the moment of silence “disgusting.”

Mr. Floyd, who was Black, was killed in 2020 when Minneapolis police officers, including Mr. Chauvin, responded to a call that Mr. Floyd had used a counterfeit bill. Mr. Floyd defied the officers’ efforts to put him into a squad car, and in the ensuing struggle Mr. Chauvin knelt on Mr. Floyd’s neck for nearly 10 minutes as he pleaded to be released and eventually stopped breathing. Horrified bystanders, filming on their cellphones, captured videos that were quickly seen around the world.

Mr. Chauvin, who is white, was convicted of murder in state court and pleaded guilty to a civil rights crime in federal court. He is serving a prison sentence of more than 20 years.

Asked about the moment of silence by a reporter for WCCO Radio, Alex Plechash, the chairman of the Minnesota Republican Party, said that “there are a lot of people, I think, that believe that Derek Chauvin was improperly convicted and not treated well.”

Mr. Plechash said in an emailed statement that it had been “a spontaneous motion brought forward from the convention floor” and “was not a statement from party leadership.”

“To be clear, party leadership did not support this motion,” he said.

Justin Malone, the chairman of the Republican Party of Otter Tail County, said that he was busy getting his delegates seated at the time of the vote and had chosen not to weigh in. He said some delegates seemed caught off guard by the mention of Mr. Chauvin.

“It was overwhelmingly accepted,” Mr. Malone said of the moment of silence. “There was not too many people who said no.”

Republicans have struggled to win statewide races in Minnesota over the last two decades, though they have sometimes come close. The party has also at times held majorities in the State Legislature.

Democrats are defending the governorship and a U.S. Senate seat this year, but neither race has an incumbent running.

Gov. Tim Walz, a Democrat, abandoned his bid for a third term early this year after facing criticism for widespread fraud of state social service programs that played out under his watch. The Trump administration used that fraud as part of its justification for an immigration enforcement blitz in Minnesota that led to three shootings, thousands of arrests and tense face-offs between federal agents and protesters.

At their convention over the weekend, Republicans endorsed Kendall Qualls, a businessman, for governor, and Adam Schwarze, a military veteran, for Senate. Those endorsements are not binding, and voters can choose those candidates or others in the August primary.

At their convention, Democratic delegates endorsed Senator Amy Klobuchar for governor and Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan for Senate.


Before making the motion on the floor of the Republican convention, Mr. Rocco said he had been unsure whether other delegates would agree with him. Even if they did not, he determined, it was worth it to draw attention to the cause.

“I was actually really surprised that the motion passed,” Mr. Rocco said.

The moment of silence for Mr. Chauvin received relatively little coverage from local news outlets in the immediate aftermath of the convention. But as Democrats began drawing attention to it, few Republicans seemed eager to comment.

Reached by phone, Mr. Schwarze declined to comment, saying he was not in the room at the time of the vote. Mr. Qualls’s campaign did not respond to emailed requests for comment, nor did the campaigns of Speaker Lisa Demuth, another Republican seeking the governorship, and Michele Tafoya, a former sportscaster running for Senate.

Mr. Rocco said he understood why many candidates were not expressing public support for his motion.

“The Republicans still have to win the trifecta this year,” he said, referring to control of the governorship and both legislative chambers. “Hopefully, they’ll be able to do it. But at the end of the line, they’re going to have to cater to the independents. I mean, that’s how all elections are won.”

Democrats were already seeking to make it a campaign issue.

“Rather than a moment of silence to honor the service members killed this year in combat across the globe,” said Jason Heaser, a Democrat seeking Mr. Nadeau’s State House seat, “they chose a political stunt to honor a man unanimously convicted by a jury of his peers for murder.”

Ernesto Londoño contributed reporting.

Mitch Smith is a Chicago-based national correspondent for The Times, covering the Midwest and Great Plains.

Julie Bosman is the Chicago bureau chief for The Times, writing and reporting stories from around the Midwest.

More on the 2026 Midterm Elections


30 April 2026

Why Is There a Voting Rights Act? A Timeline 29APR26

 

I am so ashamed of this ruling by the neo-nazi members of the supreme court of the United States. I wish ignorance, hate, bigotry and discrimination were painful. This from the New York Times.....

Why Is There a Voting Rights Act? A Timeline



The Voting Rights Act, among the most consequential pieces of U.S. civil rights legislation, was signed into law in August 1965. It came nearly a century after the 15th Amendment outlawed racial discrimination in voting in 1870.

Despite the amendment, Black Americans had continued to face barriers to one of the nation’s most fundamental rights even after ratification, including violence and intimidation, poll taxes and literacy tests. For many decades before the federal law was passed, activists marched, protested and organized voter registration campaigns. Some were brutally beaten or murdered.

The act required some state and local governments, mostly in the South, to get federal approval before changing their voting laws. It also prohibited election or voting practices that discriminate based on race, which eventually led some states to draw new congressional maps with districts that have a majority of Black voters.

In recent years, the Supreme Court has chipped away at the federal law and its enforcement tools. On Wednesday, the court, which has had a conservative majority, dealt another blow to the historic legislation by throwing out Louisiana’s latest congressional map as an illegal racial gerrymander.

Here’s a look at some events that led to and followed the Voting Rights Act of 1965.


MAY TO DECEMBER 1961



The Freedom Rides of 1961 nonviolent strategy aimed to test whether state and local governments were complying with two Supreme Court rulings. One declared that enforcing segregated seating on interstate buses was unconstitutional. The other found that segregated lunch counters, bathrooms and waiting rooms in bus terminals were unconstitutional.

The first Freedom Riders included 13 men and women, both Black and white, who traveled and sat together on interstate buses. The group included 21-year-old John Lewis, who would go on to serve in the U.S. House of Representatives for more than 30 years.

The group planned to ride from Washington to New Orleans on two buses in May 1961. But during multiple stops, they were attacked and beaten and one of the buses was firebombed. The violence forced the Freedom Riders to finish their trip to New Orleans by plane.


In May 1961.Credit...Daily Express/Hulton Archive, via Getty Images

Circa 1961.Credit...Pictorial Parade Archives, via Getty Images

In May 1961.Credit...Underwood Archives, via Getty Images

John Lewis, the future U.S. lawmaker, and another Freedom Rider in May 1961.Credit...Bettmann, via Getty Images

More than 400 volunteers participated in the rides, including Doratha Smith-Simmons, known as Dodie, now 82. As an 18-year-old, she rode a bus to a Greyhound station in McComb, Miss., where her group was attacked by a white mob. Ms. Smith-Simmons said recently that while the episode had been terrifying, she “was willing to die for the cause.”


Collectively, the rides — and the violent pushback from their opposition — helped expose the oppression of Jim Crow laws. They gained national attention and pushed the federal government to enforce desegregation laws.

June to August 1964


A leaflet from the Council of Federated Organizations, a coalition of civil rights groups, for its 1964 campaign to register Black voters in Mississippi.Credit...Heritage Art/Heritage Images via Getty Images

Freedom Summer was a 1964 campaign led by the Council of Federated Organizations, a coalition of civil rights groups, to register Black voters in Mississippi. More than 700 college students, mostly white and from Northern states, worked with local Black community members over 10 weeks to register voters.

The volunteers distributed registration information, assisted in filling out forms and escorted residents to the courthouses. It was not without risk: Some were beaten and arrested, and their cars were firebombed. Three voting rights activists — Andrew Goodman, Michael Schwerner and James Chaney — were abducted and murdered outside Philadelphia, Miss.

Of the estimated 17,000 African Americans who tried to register to vote that summer, according to the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, only 1,600 applications were accepted. That low number served as evidence of the state’s exclusion of Black voters.

FEBRUARY 1965


The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. at a funeral for Jimmie Lee Jackson, a 26-year-old Black farmer, shot by a white Alabama state trooper while participating in a voting rights demonstration march in Marion, Ala.Credit...Bettmann, via Getty Images

Jimmie Lee Jackson, a 26-year-old Black farmer, was shot by a white Alabama state trooper while participating in a voting rights march in Marion, Ala. His death spurred, in part, the major civil rights march from Selma to Montgomery. At the time, the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was leading a campaign in Alabama to fight for voter rights.


March 7, 1965

What would become known as Bloody Sunday began as a march of about 600 activists in Selma, Ala., protesting the denial of voting rights and the killing of Mr. Jackson. The march was led by Mr. Lewis, who by then was chairman of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, and the Rev. Hosea Williams of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference.

As the group crossed the Edmund Pettus Bridge, they were met by Alabama state troopers and sheriff’s deputies wielding billy clubs, bullwhips and tear gas.

Mr. Lewis was beaten and his skull was fractured.

“My legs went out from under me,” he recounted in a 2012 Democracy NOW! interview. “I felt like I was going to die.”


In March 1965.Credit...Charles Moore/Getty Images

The viciousness of the assault, captured in photos and footage, shocked the national consciousness and built support for the Voting Rights Act.


March 15, 1965




Just after Bloody Sunday, President Lyndon B. Johnson made his powerful “We Shall Overcome” speech to Congress. The televised address was watched by 70 million Americans, according to the White House Historical Association. Mr. Johnson argued that ensuring the right to vote was a fundamental principle of the American promise. He urged Congress to act immediately.

Aug. 6, 1965


Flanked by senior congressional leaders and leaders of the civil rights movement, Mr. Johnson signed the Voting Rights Act into law days after the House and the Senate approved the measure.

“Today is a triumph for freedom as huge as any victory that has ever been won on any battlefield,” he said at a signing ceremony on Capitol Hill.

The Justice Department quickly started enforcing the legislation, suing over poll taxes in Mississippi, Alabama, Texas and Virginia.


Nov. 7, 1972



Andrew Young, left, an aide to the Rev. Dr. King, was elected to a Georgia seat that included metro Atlanta. Barbara Jordan, a former state senator, was elected to a Houston-area seat. Credit...Left: Associated Press; Right: Tom Colburn, Houston Chronicle/Associated Press

The first Black lawmaker was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in 1870. But most Black Americans who have served in Congress were elected after the Voting Rights Act, though not all of those representatives were from states directly affected by the act.

The first two Black Southerners to win House seats after the law passed — in fact, since the late 1800s — both won after their districts were redrawn to follow the law.

Barbara Jordan, a former state senator, was elected to a Houston-area seat. Andrew Young, an aide to the Rev. Dr. King, was elected to a Georgia seat that included metro Atlanta. Both ran as Democrats.


1993-2013



Representative Jim Clyburn of South Carolina, top, who would serve as the No. 3 Democrat between 2007 and 2023, and Representative Bobby Scott of Virginia, bottom, who remains the top Democrat on the House Education Committee, both took office in January 1993.Credit...Left: Maureen Keating/Associated Press; Right: Karin Cooper/Getty Images;



Legal challenges under the Voting Rights Act were reshaping congressional maps across the South. New maps helped several civil rights leaders successfully run for office.

Representatives Jim Clyburn of South Carolina, who would serve as the No. 3 Democrat in the House between 2007 and 2023, and Bobby Scott of Virginia, who remains the top Democrat on the House Education Committee, both took office in January 1993.


Bennie Thompson, center, won a special election in 1993 to represent a Mississippi district.Credit...Maureen Keating/Associated Press

That year, Bennie Thompson, now the top Democrat on the Homeland Security Committee, won a special election to represent a Mississippi district that includes the state capital and much of the Mississippi Delta.


June 25, 2013



In 2013, the Supreme Court ruled that nine states, as well as some counties and municipalities elsewhere in the country, no longer had to receive federal approval to change their election laws.

The ruling effectively struck down the heart of the Voting Rights Act. The court split along ideological lines, with the conservative majority essentially finding that federal oversight was no longer needed.

“Our country has changed,” Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote for the majority. “While any racial discrimination in voting is too much, Congress must ensure that the legislation it passes to remedy that problem speaks to current conditions.”

Disenfranchised

Inside the 50-year campaign to roll back the Voting Rights Act.

2023-2024



An Alabama Senate committee discussing a proposal to draw new congressional district lines in 2023 in Montgomery, Ala.Credit...Kim Chandler/Associated Press

Without federal enforcement, states could redraw their congressional maps in ways that diluted the voting power of Black and other minority residents. When a case challenging a new map in Alabama reached the Supreme Court in 2022, some legal experts expected the conservative majority to strike down what remained of the Voting Rights Act.

But the court rejected Alabama’s map, which included only one majority Black congressional district in a state where Black residents made up about 26 percent of the voting-age population.

That ruling led to a new map not just in Alabama, but in Louisiana, where a similar challenge was unfolding. Under the new maps, each state had two districts where a majority of voters were Black.

And in 2024, Alabama and Louisiana each sent two Black representatives to Congress.

2024



Louisiana lawmakers sought to draw their own new map. That a drew legal challenge in 2024.Credit...Stephen Smith/Associated Press

Unlike Alabama, where a federal court oversaw the drawing of the new map, Louisiana lawmakers sought to draw their own.

A new map prompted a challenge from a small group of white voters in Louisiana, who argued that the state legislators had discriminated against them by impermissibly taking race into account when they drafted the new map. The Supreme Court heard arguments that fall in the case, Louisiana v. Callais.

Oct. 15, 2025


Activists rallying in front of the U.S. Supreme Court in October 2025 in Washington.Credit...Alex Wong/Getty Images

Having delayed a clear ruling in Louisiana v. Callais earlier in 2025, the Supreme Court again heard arguments over the state’s new congressional map.

This time, the court focused on whether Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act was unconstitutional because it used race as a factor in redistricting.

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court ruled 6 to 3 on the case, effectively dealing another blow to the Voting Rights Act.


Audra D. S. Burch is a national reporter, based in South Florida and Atlanta, writing about race and identity around the country.

Emily Cochrane is a national reporter for The Times covering the American South, based in Nashville.