NORTON META TAG

Showing posts with label rep fotze barbara comstock r VA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rep fotze barbara comstock r VA. Show all posts

09 June 2017

Secret Recording Reveals GOP Lawmaker Freaking out About 'Going down with the Ship' for Trump 9JUN17

Image result for trump sinking ship meme
IF these republicans don't want to possibly loose their seats in the US House all they have to do is have the courage to stand up against the immoral and destructive policies of the drumpf/trump-pence administration. For them to remain silent is proof they are republicans first and Americans second, and so they do not deserve to be re-elected. rep barbara comstock r VA (10th congressional district) is one of these republicans feigning concern about (NOT MY) pres drumpf/trump, but is she standing up to him on the issues she supposedly disagrees with?NO. She is just organizing her propaganda campaign to save her political ass while supporting the drumpf/trump-pence administration's class warfare against the majority of the American people. From AlterNet & Tucson Weekly.....

Secret Recording Reveals GOP Lawmaker Freaking out About 'Going down with the Ship' for Trump

As the president continues to unravel, Republicans are beginning to panic.
Although Rep. Martha McSally (R-AZ) may be publicly supporting President Donald Trump, in private she seems to have a lot of concerns.
Tuscon Weekly has obtained a leaked recording of McSally meeting with the Arizona Bankers Association, in which she said that President Donald Trump’s tweeting habits were making life vastly more difficult for Republican lawmakers — and could spark a massive electoral backlash against the GOP in 2018.
“It’s basically being taken out on me,” she said of Trump’s erratic behavior. “Any Republican member of Congress, you are going down with the ship. And we’re going to hand the gavel to Pelosi in 2018, they only need 28 seats and the path to that gavel being handed over is through my seat. And right now, it doesn’t matter that it’s me, it doesn’t matter what I’ve done. I have an ‘R’ next to my name and right now, this environment would have me not prevail.”
McSally then complained that liberal activists were completely tying her to Trump, thus making it impossible for her to tout her own independent record as a member of Congress.
“The environment has changed and some of it changed on January 20,” she said. “There’s just an element out there that’s just, like, so against the president. Like they just can’t see straight. And all of a sudden on January 20, I’m like his twin sister to them. And I’m, like, responsible for everything he does, and tweets and says. And they want me to be spending my time as a pundit. ‘I disagree with that. I agree with this.’ I have a job in the legislature!”
Brad Reed is a writer living in Boston. His work has previously appeared in the American Prospect Online, and he blogs frequently at Sadly, No!

The Skinny 

A secret recording shows U.S. Rep. McSally has some concerns about reelection
Congresswoman Martha McSally may be in more political trouble than she's been letting on.
Team McSally has been poo-pooing recent polls showing that more than half of the voters in her district disapprove of her job performance, while her approval has fallen down to the mid-30s, percentage-wise, and that she was losing to a generic Democrat by 7 percentage points.
But last week, in a private talk to the Arizona Bankers Association, McSally conceded that in the current political environment, she has some real challenges in next year's election.
McSally complained that President Donald Trump and his tweets were creating troubling "distractions" and "it's basically being taken out on me. Any Republican member of Congress, you are going down with the ship. And we're going to hand the gavel to Pelosi in 2018, they only need 28 seats and the path to that gavel being handed over is through my seat. And right now, it doesn't matter that it's me, it doesn't matter what I've done. I have an 'R' next to my name and right now, this environment would have me not prevail."
Admittedly, McSally was making these comments as she was asking the bankers to open their checkbooks for her reelection campaign, so it could well be that she was just doing the ol' fear-mongering-for-dollars act.
McSally's comments came to light after some of McSally's critics—including Kristen Randall, the leader of Indivisible Southern Arizona—ordered tickets to a talk McSally was giving at a luncheon for the Arizona Bankers Association.
Someone on Team McSally, however, appears to have taken a closer look at who was attending the event, because four of the five members of the group received emails about two hours before the lunch informing them that their tickets had been revoked. "They caught onto us," Randall says with a laugh.
But the fifth member (whose identity The Skinny is not privy to) did manage to appear bankerly enough to crash the party—and the spy recorded McSally's entire speech for the Randall's group, and from there, it fell into our hands.
McSally was more blunt in many of her comments behind closed doors than she typically is when questioned on the issues. In fact, she expressed frustration that the media and her constituents ask her to comment on what President Trump says and does.
"The environment has changed and some of it changed on January 20," McSally told the crowd. "There's just an element out there that's just, like, so against the president. Like they just can't see straight. And all of a sudden on January 20, I'm like his twin sister to them. And I'm, like, responsible for everything he does, and tweets and says. And they want me to be spending my time as a pundit. 'I disagree with that. I agree with this.' I have a job in the legislature!"
Randall says she does expect McSally to speak up when Trump does something offensive.
"That's her job," Randall says. "When there's going to be a vote, we want a statement. We want a dialogue. And she's not giving it to us. She seems really put out. ... She's a leader in our community and that is part of her job. There's a human component to her job that she very obviously does not enjoy."
In her talk, McSally acknowledged that the job comes with a lot of frustration. She said serving in Congress had gotten a lot harder since Trump's election last year and that she's forced to "navigate in the political theater, but I don't breathe life into it and I don't enjoy it, just to be frank with you. It actually drains me."
As she was talking to bankers, McSally focused on the latest GOP efforts to repeal the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act that regulated banks after the 2007 economic collapse. She characterized Dodd-Frank as a hindrance to banks that needs to be repealed.
"Within the public, there is often a perception that we had the financial meltdown and then Dodd-Frank was good and it was, you know, saving us from future financial meltdowns," McSally said. "You guys are all experts in the industry and you know that's not the truth. Really, what Dodd-Frank did, was it provided additional compliance and legislative regulations and more burdens upon you. It doesn't actually protect the consumer anymore, it just adds more paperwork and compliance."
McSally also had a lot to say about healthcare, but we don't have room in the column this week—so look for that online at The Range at tucsonweekly.com.
Randall says she's still hoping McSally will do some open town halls in Tucson so her group won't have to resort to subterfuge to try to find out her positions.
"I'm pretty angry that she was willing to talk to out-of-district bankers but she's not willing to talk to us," Randall said.
In the meantime, Indivisible Southern Arizona will be back to the protest beat at 8 a.m. Friday morning outside McSally's midtown offices, 4400 E. Broadway. This time, the group will be expressing unhappiness about McSally's support for overturning Dodd-Frank—and they'll have loudspeakers to play McSally's comments about the law to the bankers.

26 May 2017

REP BARBARA COMSTOCK R VA RESPONDS TO MY LETTER ON This is not a distraction: Tell your House Republican to defend our democracy REP Barbara Comstock ARE YOU AFRAID OF THE TRUTH? 25MAI17


REP barbara comstock r VA is afraid of the truth, she will not support HR356 the Protecting Our Democracy Act, she will not sign the discharge petition to bring this bill to the US House floor for a vote. As a devote of rep paul ryan (ayn rand incarnate) r WI and a supporter of the drumpf/trump-pence administration rep comstock is willing to sacrifice the truth, willing to keep our Republic open to manipulation by putin and his cabal of oligarchs rather than support an independent commission to investigate the ties between Russia and the drumpf/trump-pence 2016 presidential campaign and administration. Here is her response to me and my second letter to her. And I posted my original letter to her on her facebook page.



Dear Mr. Schwanke,

          Thank you for contacting me about the ongoing investigation regarding potential ties between the administration and the Government of Russia.  I appreciate hearing from you and welcome the opportunity to respond.

          Following the firing of former FBI Director James Comey on May 9, 2017, I called for an independent investigation that the American people can trust.  With Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s appointment of former FBI Director Robert Mueller as special counsel, the American people can have confidence in a fair and thorough investigation as well as confidence in the eventual outcome.

          Thank you again for contacting me.  It is a privilege to serve Virginia’s Tenth District.  I may also be contacted at my Sterling office at 703-404-6903, or my Washington, D.C. office at 202-225-5136.  By visiting my website at http://comstock.house.gov, you can sign up to receive my email newsletters and follow my efforts to serve you.  If I may ever be of service, please do not hesitate to contact me.
      

Sincerely,

Barbara Comstock
Member of Congress

Dear Rep Comstock,

Referencing your response to my letter (below) you did not address the issue. I told you I expect you to support HR356, the Protecting Our Democracy Act and to sign the discharge petition to bring it to the floor of the US House for a vote. The American people have a right to know everything about Russian involvement in the 2016 Presidential campaign and the the Trump-Pence campaign and administration. Your obstruction of an independent commission to investigate Russian interference in the election and involvement in the Trump-Pence administration shows you are willing to take part in a cover-up and keep the truth from the American people. You are placing party over the the people and that is wrong. You need to reconsider and to support HR356 and sign the discharge petition.
Displaying

Dear Mr. Schwanke,

          Thank you for contacting me about the ongoing investigation regarding potential ties between the administration and the Government of Russia.  I appreciate hearing from you and welcome the opportunity to respond.

          Following the firing of former FBI Director James Comey on May 9, 2017, I called for an independent investigation that the American people can trust.  With Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s appointment of former FBI Director Robert Mueller as special counsel, the American people can have confidence in a fair and thorough investigation as well as confidence in the eventual outcome.

          Thank you again for contacting me.  It is a privilege to serve Virginia’s Tenth District.  I may also be contacted at my Sterling office at 703-404-6903, or my Washington, D.C. office at 202-225-5136.  By visiting my website at http://comstock.house.gov, you can sign up to receive my email newsletters and follow my efforts to serve you.  If I may ever be of service, please do not hesitate to contact me.
      

Sincerely,

Barbara Comstock
Member of Congress



25 May 2017

TOM PERRIELLO The stakes of this election 24MAI17

Tom Perriello for Governor
TOM PERRIELLO, Democratic candidate for Governor of Virginia, is a strong advocate for the people of Virginia and believes access to health care is a right for all not a privilege for those who can afford it. His position on health care for all Virginians is here, and he speaks out strongly against the health care bill passed by the US House and calls on us to take action against it by contacting our Senators and Representative in D.C. If you prefer to send an e mail instead of calling you can send an e mail to Virginia's Senators Warner and Kaine here and to your US Representative for your district in Virginia here. This from Tom Perriello, and I hope you will check out his campaign website and decide he is the best candidate for Governor and support his campaign by donating and / or volunteering for him. REMEMBER, the primary is Tuesday, 13 JUNE 17, we need you to vote! Democracy is not a spectator sport!!!


The Congressional Budget Office just released the latest report on the devastating impacts of the Republican’s health care bill and I wanted to share them with you. It shows what’s at stake in this election and what we have to fight for.
Under this bill:
  • As many as 23 million Americans will be uninsured.
  • Premiums for many will jump 20% next year.
  • If governors and states accept the waiver, insurers in those states will drop people with pre-existing conditions, and premiums for low-income seniors could go up 800%.
Our likely Republican opponent Ed Gillespie has already gone on the record saying he is open to these waivers, endangering the health care of hundreds of thousands of Virginians. We can’t sit back for a second.
Call your member of Congress tomorrow, call your Senators, visit their local offices, and write a letter if you can. Do everything in your power to fight this bill and make sure they hear from you.
U.S. Capitol switchboard: (202) 224-3121
Your representative: Representative Barbara Comstock (R)
(202) 225-5136
I will do everything I can now and as Virginia's next governor to fight with you. I know how important and how personal this is for all our families.
Keep fighting,
Tom Perriello


This is not a distraction: Tell your House Republican to defend our democracy REP Barbara Comstock ARE YOU AFRAID OF THE TRUTH? 24MAI17



WAG THE DOG. The drumpf/trump-pence (YES,  NOT MY vp mike pence is part of this) administration is doing everything they can to distract the American people from their involvement in Russian interference in the 2016 Presidential election. HR356, the Protecting Our Democracy Act, is a bill to create an independent commission to investigate the drumpf/trump-pence campaign's and administration's ties to Russia detrimental to the American Republic. If the drumpf/trump-pence administration has nothing to hide then their republican allies in the US House should be willing to sponsor this bill and sign the discharge petition to bring this to the House floor for a vote over the objection of speaker paul ryan r WI. Please click here and send your republican member of congress a letter (OK to copy and paste my letter below or the letter from Daily Kos at the bottom of this post) demanding they support HR356 and sign the discharge petition. Rep barbara comstok, r VA 10th congressional district (my rep in the US House) are you afraid of the truth?

MY LETTER TO rep barbara comstock r VA
The appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate Trump's ties to Russia was an important step. However, the special counsel’s job is limited to criminal activity. An independent commission is needed to uncover the truth about Russia’s attack on our democracy in 2016 and recommend measures to make sure it never happens again. Sign the discharge petition to bring the Protecting Our Democracy Act (HR 356) to the floor and vote to create an independent commission to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 election. If this administration has nothing to hide then they and rep paul ryan shouldn't be blocking this bill from coming to the House floor for a vote.  As one of your constituents I want to know whose side are you on Rep Comstock? What are you afraid of finding out? Can you handle the truth?

FROM DAILY KOS
There is a lot of news coming out of Washington, D.C. this week and that is likely by design. Donald Trump and Republicans think that as long as we are fighting their agenda, we won't be able to continue pushing for an investigation into Trump's ties to Russia.

But as the scale and scope of the Trump administration's corruption unfolds, one thing has become abundantly clear: We cannot let Donald Trump off the hook.

Tell your Republican member of Congress: Choose country over party. Defend democracy by supporting a floor vote on the Protecting Our Democracy Act. Click here to sign.
 Even if you've already sent a letter, please send another one. Republicans need to know it’s their job to choose country over party.

SEND A LETTER


House Democrats, joined by two Republicans, have filed a discharge petition to force a vote on legislation that would create a bipartisan, independent commission with full subpoena power to investigate Trump's ties to Russia.

If successful, a discharge petition would allow the Protecting Our Democracy Act (HR 356)—legislation that creates an independent commission—to bypass Speaker Paul Ryan and finally get a floor vote. And if not successful, the petition would pinpoint individual Republicans who refused to consider the issue, without the option of hiding behind Ryan’s refusal to allow a vote.

A discharge petition only requires a simple majority of the House—218 members. As of this writing, 193 members have already signed onto the petition. We just need 25 more House Republicans to join. Will you help us increase the pressure on your member of Congress, Craig?

Send a letter to your Republican member of Congress: Sign the discharge petition to bring the Protecting Our Democracy Act (HR 356) to the floor and vote to create an independent commission to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 election.


SEND A LETTER


The American people are due an impartial, thorough and independent investigation into the relationship between Donald Trump and the Russian government. An organized resistance is the best path to finally getting answers. Thank you for everything you do to defend our communities and this democracy.

Keep fighting,
Monique Teal, Daily Kos

COPY AND PASTE THIS LETTER TO YOUR REP, AND BE SURE TO ADD YOUR OWN COMMENTS!
Please support the Protecting Our Democracy Act (HR 356). Appointing a special prosecutor to investigate Russia's attack on our democracy was an important step. But while the special counsel will announce whether there are criminal charges, an independent commission would release a detailed report of what happened, who knew what when, and what steps are needed to prevent future interference in our elections and hold Trump accountable. Sign the discharge petition to bring the Protecting Our Democracy Act (HR 356) to the floor and vote to create an independent commission to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 election.

04 May 2017

The Hill's Whip List: 18 GOP no votes on new ObamaCare replacement bill & After announcing retirement, one GOP congresswoman is torching the GOP health care plan 26APR/4MAI&4MAI17


 Image result for healthcare meme

NO, Virginia's 10th congressional district's repiglican representative in the US House, political hure barbara comstock is voting no on the latest drumpf/trump-ryancare bill to replace the ACA according to The Hill. She is voting against the bill not out of concern for her constituents, after all she has been a good, obedient girl for her fellow ayn rand devote rep fotze paul ryan r WI, voting how she has been told to vote most of the time. But now, Dylan is right on, the times, they are a changin', and while comstock didn't have any problem supporting and voting for "grab 'em by the pussy" drumpf/trump for president she is finding out the greedy, fascist, xenophobic, authoritarian policies of the drumpf/trump-pence administration and the repiglican leadership in congress isn't supported in the 10th district. comstock hasn't had a change of heart, she doesn't care about the majority of us. No, she knows her congressional seat is on the line. The thing is, we shouldn't have to fight her every time to get her to do the right thing, but as a follower of ayn rand (she must be considering her relationship with rep ryan) she can't give a damn about us. Our district, Virginia and the nation will be better off when comstock is defeated in 2018. Until then, we have to continue watching her on every vote in the house. Watch the video below about ayn rand, the person comstock seeks to emulate politically, then read these articles from The Hill
The Truth About GOP Hero Ayn Rand

The Hill's Whip List: 18 GOP no votes on new ObamaCare replacement bill

BY THE HILL STAFF - 
House Republicans have an updated bill to repeal and replace ObamaCare, and The Hill has a new whip list.
The updated bill includes an amendment from Reps. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) and Tom MacArthur (R-N.J.) that would allow states to opt out of key ObamaCare rules, including on minimum coverage requirements and allowing insurers to charge more based on individuals' health.
Those changes were designed to win over conservatives, and the new legislation has been backed by the House Freedom Caucus and outside groups including the Club for Growth and FreedomWorks.
Centrists, though, expressed concerns over preexisting conditions.
On Wednesday, Rep. Fred Upton drafted a new amendment that would provide $8 billion over five years to help people with preexisting conditions pay for premiums in states that seek waivers.
The question is whether that is enough to bring centrists on board.
A mix of centrists and conservatives objected to the earlier ObamaCare bill, forcing GOP leaders to call off a planned vote.
No Democrats are expected to vote for the measure, and one Republican, Rep. Dan Newhouse (Wash.), will miss the vote, meaning GOP leaders can only afford 21 defections.
Below is a list of where key Republicans stand based on the new bill.
The list will be continually updated. Please send updates to mmali@thehill.com
This list was last updated on May 4 at 12:40 p.m.
Recent updates: Reps. Dave Reichert (Wash.), Mike Coffman (Colo.), Elise Stefanik (N.Y.), Jeff Denham (Calif.), Erik Paulsen (Minn.), John Faso (N.Y.), Gus Bilirakis (Fla.), Steve King (Iowa), David McKinley (W.Va.), Brian Mast (Fla.), Mark Amodei (Nev.), David Young (Iowa), Ted Budd (N.C.), Daniel Webster (Fla.), Darin LaHood (Ill.), John Faso (N.Y.), Barbara Comstock (Va.), Dan Donovan (N.Y.), Jaime Herrera Beutler (Wash.), Frank LoBiondo, Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (Fla.), Carlos Curbelo (Fla.), Fred Upton (Mich.), Billy Long (Mo.), Steve Chabot (Ohio), Chris Collins (N.Y.) Don Young (Alaska), Paul Gosar (Ariz.), Brad Wenstrup (Ohio), Andy Harris (Md.), Rodney Davis (Ill.), Louie Gohmert (Texas), Rodney Frelinghuysen (N.J.), Kevin Yoder(Kan.), and David Valadao (Calif.).

NO (18)
Rep. Andy Biggs (Ariz.) — “The MacArthur amendment is an effort to make the AHCA better, but it does not meet my constituents’ threshold for repeal,” the Freedom Caucus member said. Biggs was a no on the first bill.
Rep. Mike Coffman (Colo.) — “At this time, I cannot support the AHCA with the MacArthur amendment because I’m concerned that a small percentage of those with preexisting conditions may still not be protected,” he said in a statement. “Also, as I have stated in the past, I’m certainly not going to vote on a bill of this magnitude that hasn’t been fully scored by the Congressional Budget Office and whose estimated price tag is unknown.”
Rep. Barbara Comstock (Va.) — The centrist Republican told The Hill she is still a no after the Upton Amendment. Comstock is one of Democrats' top targets in 2018.
Rep. Ryan Costello (Pa.) — Costello told reporters Thursday he was a no.
Rep. Charlie Dent (Pa.) — The co-chairman of the centrist Tuesday Group is still a no.
Rep. Dan Donovan (N.Y.) — The freshman lawmaker told The Hill he still plans to vote no after the Upton Amendment.
Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (Pa.) — A centrist, Fitzpatrick is still a no.
Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler (Wash.) — Herrera Beutler, a member of the Tuesday Group, is still a no after the Upton Amendment.
Rep. Walter Jones (N.C.) — Jones, who has bucked GOP leaders on a number of occasions, is still a no.
Rep. John Katko (N.Y.) — Katko is still a no. "To me, it doesn't move the needle enough," he told Syracuse.com. Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton won Katko's district in November.
Rep. Leonard Lance (N.J.) — Lance is still a no.
Rep. Frank LoBiondo (N.J.) — LoBiondo is still voting no despite the changes.
Rep. Thomas Massie (Ky.) — Massie, a conservative who is not in the Freedom Caucus, said he is still a no.
Rep. Patrick Meehan (Pa.) — Meehan said the revised bill would raise premiums for those with pre-existing conditions and older Americans.
Rep. Dave Reichert (Wash.) — "This bill, although a good attempt, falls short," he reportedly told a Seattle TV station.
Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (Fla.) — The centrist Republican from south Florida said she is a no even with the Upton Amendment. Clinton won Ros-Lehtinen's district by nearly 20 points in 2016, but the longtime GOP lawmaker said she will not seek reelection in 2018.
Rep. Chris Smith (N.J.) — Smith told ABC he is still a no. The New Jersey lawmaker is meeting with leaders Thursday.
Rep. Michael Turner (Ohio) — Turner on Thursday told CNN he is still a no.
 UNDECIDED/UNCLEAR (47)
Rep. Justin Amash (Mich.) — The Freedom Caucus member told reporters Thursday morning he is still reviewing the changes. He was a no in March.
Rep. Brian Babin (Texas) — The Texas lawmaker, a former member of the Freedom Caucus, was yes on the first bill.
Rep. Rob Bishop (Utah) — Bishop was undecided on the first bill.
Rep. Rod Blum (Iowa) — Freedom Caucus member was a no on the first bill.
Rep. Paul Cook (Calif.)  Cook was undecided on the first bill.
Rep. Rick Crawford (Ark.) — Crawford was a no on the first bill.
Rep. John Culberson (Texas)  Culberson was undecided on the first bill.
Rep. Carlos Curbelo (Fla.) — Curbelo said he was still undecided on Thursday morning. He said leaders made "compelling points" after a meeting.
Rep. Warren Davidson (Ohio) ­— Davidson was undecided on the first bill.
Rep. Jeff Denham (Calif.) — Denham previously The Hill he was a no. The lawmaker, though, also sponsored the Upton amendment on Wednesday.
Rep. Ron DeSantis (Fla.) — DeSantis was undecided on the first bill.
Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (Fla.) — A centrist, Diaz-Balart voted to advance the first bill in the House Budget Committee but said he had "serious concerns."
Rep. Jeff Duncan (S.C.) — Duncan, a Freedom Caucus member, was a lean no on the first bill.
Rep. Neal Dunn (Fla.) — Dunn was undecided on the first bill.
Rep. Tom Emmer (Minn.) — Emmer was undecided on the first bill.
Rep. Ron Estes (Kan.) — Sworn in last week, Estes says he needs to review the changes.
Rep. Jeff Fortenberry (Neb.)
Rep. Trent Franks (Ariz.)  The Freedom Caucus member was undecided on the first bill.
Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen (N.J.) — The chairman of the Appropriations Committee was a no on the first bill. He told The Hill on May 1 he is "still looking" at the changes. "My position is that I'm focused on the appropriations process, trying to get the bill across the finish line. I haven't been focused on anything else."
Rep. Tom Garrett (Va.) — Garrett was a no on the first bill.
Rep. Duncan Hunter (Calif.)  — Hunter was undecided on the first bill.
Rep. Will Hurd (Texas) — Hurd was undecided on the first bill.
Rep. Darrell Issa (Calif.) — Issa initially declined to share his position on Wednesday, before telling a reporter for a San Diego ABC affiliate that he's "undecided and still reviewing the changes to the bill.”
Rep. Mike Johnson (La.) — Johnson was undecided on the first bill.
Rep. David Joyce (Ohio) — Joyce, formerly a no, said Tuesday he is undecided.
Rep. Trent Kelly (Miss.) — Kelly was undecided on the first bill.
Rep. Pete King (N.Y.) — King was leaning no on the first bill.
Rep. Adam Kinzinger (Ill.) — Kinzinger is undecided. He was a yes on the earlier bill.
Rep. Steve Knight (Calif.) — Knight was undecided on the first bill.
Rep. David Kustoff (Tenn.) — Kustoff was undecided on the first bill.
Rep. Raúl Labrador (Idaho) — The Freedom Caucus member was a no on the first bill.
Rep. Darin LaHood (R-Ill.) — LaHood is undecided on the bill. 
Rep. Doug LaMalfa (Calif.) — LaMalfa was undecided on the first bill.
Rep. Mia Love (Utah)  Love was undecided on the first bill.
Rep. Michael McCaul (Texas) — McCaul was undecided on the first bill.
Rep. Steve Pearce (N.M.) — Pearce was a lean no on the first bill.
Rep. Scott Perry (Pa.) — Perry was a lean no on the first bill.
Rep. Bruce Poliquin (Maine) — Poliquin, a centrist, was undecided on the first bill.
Rep. Ted Poe (Texas) — Poe was a yes on the first bill.
Rep. Bill Posey (Fla.) — Posey was a no on the first bill.
Rep. Ed Royce (Calif.) — The House Foreign Affairs chairman is undecided and has serious concerns with the revised bill, a spokesperson told The Hill.
Rep. Glenn Thompson (Pa.) — Thompson was a no on the first bill.
Rep. David Valadao (Calif.)  Valadao is still undecided.
Rep. Randy Weber (Texas) — The Freedom Caucus member was undecided on the first bill.
Rep. Rob Wittman (Va.) — Wittman was a no on the first bill.
Rep. Kevin Yoder (Kan.) — Yoder is undecided on the revised bill.
Rep. Don Young (Alaska) — Young was a lean no on the first bill. He said he is undecided on the new bill.
 YES/LEAN YES (35)
Rep. Ralph Abraham (La.) — Abraham also backed the first bill.
Rep. Mark Amodei (Nev.) — Amodei has been no for awhile, but told Matt Fuller of The Huffington Post on Thursday, hours before a possible vote, that he was a yes.
Rep. Gus Bilirakis (Fla.) — Bilirakis told The Hill he is a yes.
Rep. Dave Brat (Va.) — The Freedom Caucus member is now a yes.
Rep. Mo Brooks (Ala.)  — The Freedom Caucus member was a no, but is now supports the revised bill.
Rep. Ken Buck (Colo.)  Buck is still a yes on the new bill.
Rep. Ted Budd (N.C.) — In a late Wednesday statement, Budd said he's "proud to support the American Health Care Act," saying Thursday's vote "marks the beginning of the end of Obamacare as we know it." 
Rep. Steve Chabot (Ohio) — The chairman of the House Small Business Committee told The Hill he is a yes.
Rep. Chris Collins (N.Y.) — Collins, an early Trump supporter, is a yes.
Rep. Rodney Davis (Ill.) — GOP Whip Team member tells The Hill he will vote for the new bill.
Rep. Scott DesJarlais (Tenn.) — The Freedom Caucus member says he'll support the bill now with the changes. He was a no in March.
Rep. John Faso (N.Y.)  Faso said he is a yes on Thursday morning. “After careful review of the changes to the American Health Care Act, I believe that this legislation addresses my concerns and I will support the AHCA as amended.”
Rep. Louie Gohmert (Texas) — The Freedom Caucus member was a no on the first bill but is backing the revised legislation.
Rep. Paul Gosar (Ariz.)  Gosar was undecided on the first bill but is now voting yes.
Rep. Andy Harris (Md.) — The Freedom Caucus member was a no on the first bill, but told The Hill he is now voting yes.
Rep. Jody Hice (Ga.) — Hice, a Freedom Caucus member, is a yes on the revised bill. In a statement, he said he supported the bill, but added, "the battle for a full repeal is not over."
Rep. Jim Jordan (Ohio) — Jordan, a former chairman of the House Freedom Caucus, is now a yes. "It is our best chance to pass a bill through the House that will actually reduce the cost of health insurance for everyday Americans," he said Wednesday.
Rep. Steve King (Iowa) — King told ABC he is a yes. King had been undecided before the Upton Amendment.
Rep. Billy Long (Mo.) — Long, who was opposed, is now supporting the bill after an amendment from Rep. Fred Upton on preexisting conditions.
Rep. Tom MacArthur (N.J.) — The leader of the centrist Tuesday Group negotiated the changes to the bill.
Rep. Brian Mast (Fla.) — Mast is a yes.
Rep. David McKinley (W.Va.) — McKinley is voting yes, according to NBC News.
Rep. Mark Meadows (N.C.) — The leader of the House Freedom Caucus negotiated the changes with MacArthur.
Rep. Erik Paulsen (Minn.) — Paulsen's office said he is a yes.
Rep. Tom Reed (N.Y.) — Reed is now a lean yes. He voted the first bill out of the Ways and Means Committee.
Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (Calif.) — Rohrabacher was undecided on the first bill, but says he'll back the amended legislation. Says he is "inclined to support our leadership."
Rep. Mark Sanford (S.C.) — Sanford, a member of the Freedom Caucus, flipped to yes from no after the changes.
Rep. Elise Stefanik (N.Y.) — A member of the Tuesday Group, Stefanik is a yes. “The American Health Care Act is not perfect, but it is an important step in reforming our broken healthcare system to help families in our district. As this legislation moves to the Senate, I will continue to work to strengthen the support for those with pre-existing conditions,” Stefanik said in a statement, according to the Times Union.
Rep. Fred Upton (Mich.) — The former Energy and Commerce chairman is supporting the bill after drafting an amendment to address concerns over preexisting conditions. Upton, who previously opposed the bill, announced the change after a meeting Wednesday with President Trump.
Rep. Jackie Walorski (Ind.) — GOP Whip team member is a "yes."
Rep. Mimi Walters (Calif.) — Walters told the Los Angeles Times she is still a yes.
Rep. Daniel Webster (Fla.) — Webster told The Hill he is now a yes on Wednesday night.
Rep. Brad Wenstrup (Ohio) — Wenstrup was undecided on the first bill but told The Hill he is now a yes.
Rep. Ted Yoho (Fla.)  Yoho, a Freedom Caucus member, told Fox News he is a "yes, under duress." Yoho was a no on the first bill.
Rep. David Young (Iowa) — Young is a co-sponsor of the Upton amendment and appears to be moving closer to voting yes on the bill. In a statement, he said the need for action is highlighted by news that the insurer Medica is leaving his state. "This amendment reinforces my commitment to ensuring coverage for Iowans with pre-existing conditions; it will help make healthcare coverage less expensive than under current law — the Affordable Care Act — and accessible for patients who need it most.”
U.S. Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (FL-27) recently made a surprise announcement that she will be retiring, not seeking re-election in 2018. Perhaps that has freed her up to speak the truth about the impending disaster of a massive tax cut for the wealthy, stealthily disguised as a health care plan , because today she issued a statement saying she intends to vote against the Trumpcare AHCA bill. Rep. Ros-Lehtinen plainly says this bill “fails to prove for the needs of my constituents” and has the “potential to severely harm the health and lives of people in South Florida.” Read her statement and see why she isn’t just a no, she’s a HELL NO:
"Despite amendments and changes, the AHCA still fails to provide for the needs of my constituents. I will not support a bill that has the potential to severely harm the health and lives of people in South Florida and therefore I remain steadfast in my commitment to vote NO on the AHCA. The recent addition of further funds to high risk pools continues to be inadequate and fails to cover those who need it most. If enacted, the older and poorer South Floridians will be worse off and will find it more difficult to obtain quality healthcare. My constituents should not have to take a step backward in their ability to obtain treatment for any illness and thus, I will vote NO."
Too bad her colleagues are caving right and left, ignoring the will and the needs of their constituents. The midterm elections take place on November 6, 2018. We have 551 days to get these bums out of Congress and restore our health care protections.