NORTON META TAG

Showing posts with label carbon pollution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label carbon pollution. Show all posts

29 October 2017

FROM EARTHJUSTICE: TAKE ACTION: Don't let polluters roll back environmental protections 29OKT17


EARTHJUSTICE continues to receive 4 stars (highest ranking) on the Charity Navigator website. Their mission statement explains what they do best. Earthjustice is a public interest law firm dedicated to protecting the magnificent places, natural resources, and wildlife of this earth and to defending the right of all people to a healthy environment. We bring about far-reaching change by enforcing and strengthening environmental laws on behalf of hundreds of organizations, coalitions and communities. Established as the Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund in 1971, Earthjustice has a legal staff of more than 50 in eight offices around the country. Earthjustice uses federal and state environmental laws to protect the environment by taking government agencies to court for failing to enforce our nation's environmental laws, and corporations for breaking them. Earthjustice does this work on behalf of hundreds of community and environmental groups, providing legal services free of charge.
Here are a few of the actions they are involved in now, click on the links and make your voice heard on these important environmental issues and if you are able make a donation (I have been a monthly donor for a few years), no amount is too small, because the Earth does need good lawyers, especially now.

“We must preserve what’s left for our survival and that of our children and grandchildren.”
Earthjustice
 
Polluters are pushing hard to roll back environmental protections and take away our public lands for personal profit, but Earthjustice supporters continue to fight back, standing up for their rights and urging decision-makers to do what is best for the environment and the health of their constituents:
“Please stop the pollution of our land! We want to leave a clean world for our children and grandchildren!”
“The 'P' in EPA stands for protection. Protect us, EPA, that’s all you have to do.”
“Please end the disruption of natural habitats and the pollution of our public lands for profit.”
Here are a few opportunities to make your voice heard:
 
Oil and gas fields in California's Central Valley. (Chris Jordan-Bloch/Earthjustice)
Stop waste and pollution on our public landsWhen oil and gas sites are spewing toxic pollution and climate-harming methane, the solution is not to give them license to pollute more. Tell the Bureau of Land Management to enforce a commonsense safeguard that requires oil and gas companies to find and fix leaks, and to reduce venting and flaring from their operations, on public and tribal lands.
TAKE ACTION
 
 
 
Young boy having fun, playing in park. (iStock)
Give our kids the clean ride they deserveVolkswagen was caught cheating federal emissions tests, and are now paying a $14.7 billion settlement. We’re demanding your governor use tens of millions of dollars your state will receive from the VW settlement to upgrade their aging fleet of toxic diesel school buses to zero-emissions electric buses.
TAKE ACTION
 
 
 
Marti Blake points out of her window at the Cheswick coal fire power plant in Springdale PA. Blake has breathing and sleeping problems and says that living next to the plant is a 'nightmare'. (Chris Jordan-Bloch/Earthjustice)
Ask the EPA to not repeal the Clean Power PlanScott Pruitt has begun the process of repealing the Clean Power Plan, which places first-ever limits on the huge quantities of carbon pollution emitted by our country’s electric power plants.
TAKE ACTION
 
 
 
Sincerely,
 
Zarah Patriana
Digital Advocacy Manager

07 March 2016

INDONESIA'S JUNGLE & PEATLANDS BURN, CORPORATE AMERICA MAKES EMPTY PROMISES 7MAR16

borneo
borneo

pepsi, johnson & johnson, and colgate-palmolive are responsible for the continuing burning of Indonesia. The ceos and corporate boards might as well be lighting the fires themselves. +Greenpeace USA  is part of a petition campaign to force these companies to stop buying palm oil and paper products from plantations planted on recently burned land. They must follow Indonesia's plans for stopping rainforest and peatland destruction. Please click one of the links to sign the petition, share it with friends and be sure to stop buying these companies products until they stop burning Indonesia. 

The palm oil industry is the number one cause of rainforest destruction in Indonesia.
End the Destruction

Tell PepsiCo, Colgate-Palmolive and Johnson & Johnson and other major brands to take urgent action to stop the destruction.

Take Action
One of the greatest environmental disasters of the 21st century happened last September.

What's even more unbelievable is that it's going to happen all over again in just a few months. And it will keep happening every year unless we take action now.

When enormous forest fires tore across Indonesia just six months ago, they reduced millions of acres of vibrant, living tropical rainforest and peatland to smoking ash. The scale of devastation was immense — the fires spewed out more C02 than the entire country of Japan, made hundreds of thousands of people sick, and destroyed precious orangutan habitat.

Unless we make those responsible take action, these fires are coming back to cause even more destruction.

Will you tell major brands like PepsiCo, Colgate-Palmolive and Johnson & Johnson to stop the destruction of forests and peatland for palm oil?.

Those fires were no natural disaster. Over several decades, huge areas of forest have been slashed and burned, and watery peatland has been drained for palm oil and paper plantations. That destruction is the root cause of the forest fires.

We can change this. When we act together, we make a real difference on the ground. Last year over 253,000 of us told the Indonesian president: Stop letting paper and palm oil companies destroy forests and peatlands.

And it worked — the president moved quickly to bring in ambitious new plans to protect Indonesian peatland. But now, the big brands that buy palm oil from Indonesia need to step up and make this change happen. 

Brands like PepsiCo, Colgate-Palmolive and Johnson & Johnson all like to talk loudly about their 'no deforestation' policies. But despite promises and pledges, more of Indonesia’s rainforest is being destroyed right now than ever before. Empty promises aren’t working, because they’re not enforced on the ground. These brands have to give us real commitments, real timelines and real action against their suppliers who destroy forests and peatlands. And you can make them do it.

A forest fire in Indonesia may seem thousands of miles away, but the everyday products that cause this suffering are in our cupboards and on our bathroom shelves. Palm oil is in everything from cosmetics and shampoo to chocolate bars and breakfast cereals. It’s hard to avoid, and sustainable alternatives are so incredibly limited.

The only answer is to change the entire industry. I hope I can count on you to be a part of protecting these last precious forests.

For the Forests,

Rolf Skar
Forests Campaign Director, Greenpeace USA

P.S. Unless we force industry to stop trashing the rainforests for this palm oil, the last home of endangered orangutans will be lost forever. Take action now!

23 January 2016

Signature needed: Stop sales of *all* fossil fuels on federal lands 23JAN16


IF we are able to stop the sale of all fossil fuels from federal lands it will be a win win for all Americans. Not only will we end the subsidies for big coal, oil and gas on the under market prices they pay for our natural resources from federal lands, it would also be a huge step in decreasing our national carbon footprint. It would also stimulate more research and development of renewable and clean energy sources, in conservation and fuel efficiency, and should lead business and local, state and the federal government to work together upgrade and expand the national power grid. Please sign this petition from +CREDO Mobile (my cell phone company).....
Conversation opened. 1 unread message.

16 January 2016

This is huge news; U.S. Announces Moratorium On New Coal Leases On Federal Lands 15JAN16

https://dbqvwi2zcv14h.cloudfront.net/images/16775624522_ff37ef3d9b_b.jpg
AMAZING environmental news this week, Pres Obama has declared a moratorium on coal sales on public lands!!!!! The momentum to address climate change, from stopping the keystone xl pipeline through the Paris Climate Change summit to the flight to stop the huge oil export terminal in Vancouver, WA, is ours. Big coal companies are filing bankruptcy, big oil is canceling oil field exploration and development, while conservation, energy efficiency, and expansion of solar and wind power drive the American people's desire for cleaner, renewable energy. +350.org is calling on people to join their campaign calling on the U.S. government to stop all sales of fossil fuels from public lands, click the link to sign. This from 350.org and +NPR .....
Huge news: the Obama administration is putting a moratorium on new coal sales on public lands.
This moratorium will keep enormous amounts of carbon in the ground and move the U.S. closer toward hitting our climate goals set in Paris. And if our next President makes the moratorium permanent, this could end up being the single biggest step toward keeping fossil fuels in the ground that the U.S. has ever taken. We’re talking about 212 gigatons of carbon left safely underground! (To put that in perspective, the Canadian tar sands represent about 240 gigatons of carbon.)
This is a real movement-driven victory too: from marching in the streets across the country (and around the world) this past December, to winning big fights like the Keystone XL rejection and Arctic drilling -- today’s announcement is possible because of the momentum that you’ve had a hand in creating. The climate movement is really changing the political game.
And we can’t stop now. This win is a huge deal, but this fight isn’t over. We’re calling on Obama to end all government sales of fossil fuels -- including oil and gas.
The administration’s plan is to stop federal coal sales and do a complete review of the federal coal leasing program, which has essentially been giving away our public lands to the fossil fuel industry to extract coal (and oil and gas) since 1920.
Most importantly, the review will focus on the climate impacts of coal -- and any proper climate review will conclude that we need to leave the coal on public lands untouched. The industry already has five times more coal, oil and gas reserves than we can safely burn. Keeping climate change below 2°C, which the Obama administration has pledged to do -- let alone the 1.5°C it said in Paris that we should be aiming for -- means a radical shift toward keeping fossil fuels in the ground across the board.
Here’s what the head of the National Mining Association said about this decision: “It appears that they’re going after the federal coal leasing program with the intention of keeping coal in the ground.” Yes!
Keeping coal in the ground is exactly what needs to happen. Let’s make sure oil and gas are next. Click here to ask President Obama to go even further.
Fossil fuels have no place in a 21st century energy plan, and our government has no business selling them. President Obama could keep half of all U.S. fossil fuels underground forever by banning government sales of all fossil fuels.
Fossil fuel companies already have way more fossil fuels than we can burn -- we can’t afford to sell them any more. This win is great news, but this fight is nowhere near done.
We’ve got the upper hand right now, and momentum is key. Click here to turn up the heat.
Let’s keep winning,
Sara
Sources:
  1. In Climate Move, Obama Halts New Coal Mining Leases on Public Lands, New York Times.
  2. The Potential Greenhouse Gas Emissions from U.S. Federal Fossil Fuels, Eco-Shift Consulting.
  3. Game Over for the Climate, James Hansen, New York Times.

350.org is building a global climate movement. Become a sustaining donor to keep this movement strong and growing.

The federal government will stop issuing new coal leases on some 570 million acres of federal land, under a new plan being released Friday. In this photo from 2013, coal is loaded onto a truck at a mine built on federally controlled land in Montana.
The federal government will stop issuing new coal leases on some 570 million acres of federal land, under a new plan being released Friday. In this photo from 2013, coal is loaded onto a truck at a mine built on federally controlled land in Montana.
Matthew Brown/AP 
 
Citing concerns over pricing and pollution, the Obama administration on Friday unveiled a moratorium on new coal leases on federal lands. The change won't affect existing leases, which generated nearly $1.3 billion for the government last year.
The Department of the Interior says it wants to make sure the money it's charging for coal leases takes into account both market prices and what's often called the "social costs" of coal — its impact on climate change and public health.
The agency says federal lands account for roughly 40 percent of all U.S. coal production.
NPR's Jeff Brady reports:
"The moratorium will remain in place while the agency reviews whether fees charged to mining companies provides a fair return and considers coal's effect on the environment. Leases already awarded are not affected."
Update at 10:50 a.m. ET: Two Reactions
As you would expect, there are vastly different reactions to the announcement. We'll excerpt two here.
First, from Rhea Suh, president of the Natural Resources Defense Council:
"The president is right to stop this handout to big coal companies, which has cost American taxpayers more than $30 billion over the past three decades."
And from Rep. Rob Bishop, R-Utah, Chairman of the House Committee on Natural Resources:
"This unprecedented action will completely shut down coal leasing on Federal lands and will disproportionately harm the poorest among us."
Our original post continues:
The review process is expected to take about three years. Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell announced the change in a conference call Friday morning. Before that call, an administration official confirmed details of the plan to Jeff.
During what her agency is calling a "pause" in issuing leases, Jewell said Friday, "we'll make accommodations in the event of emergency circumstances to ensure this pause will have no material impact on the nation's ability to meet its power generation needs."
In addition to analyzing the return American taxpayers are earning on the use of natural resources, the Interior Department says it'll also review coal's public health impacts.
The federal Bureau of Land Management handles coal leasing on the approximately 570 million acres of land. In 2014, 475 million of those acres were covered by leases, along with one sale.
The federal shift on coal leases comes weeks after the BLM announced that in 2015, its coal program had taken in about $1.29 billion in royalties, rents and bonuses. That's from a release in which the agency celebrated "major gains in 2015 ensuring safe and responsible energy development on public lands."
Last spring, Jewell called for a new discussion of the federal coal program, focusing on the fairness of prices charged for coal leases and other concerns at five public meetings.
The U.S. government shares coal-lease revenue with the states where the land is located. In recent years, that has meant hundreds of millions of dollars for Wyoming, which accounts for the most acreage and leases in the federal system and is the nation's leading coal producer.
In 2014, the most recent year with complete data, Wyoming received more than $555 million in royalties and revenues, with more than 200,000 acres covered by 102 federal leases. Colorado and Utah are the next-largest participants, with more than 80,000 acres.

14 November 2014

URGENT ACTION NEEDED: The House is voting on Keystone XL TODAY! 14NOV14

THE house will be voting on the keystone xl pipeline sometime today. Environmentalist, ranchers, Native Americans, renewable energy advocates in Canada and the U.S. have been campaigning against this pipeline for the past several years. It is bad for the environment, a very real threat to the Ogallala Aquifer, it will not come close to creating as many good paying, permanent jobs as investing in renewable energy would, it is a threat to our nation's breadbasket in the Midwest and the mining and refining of this filthy tar sands oil will increase the carbon pollution of the U.S. and Canada. The only ones who will benefit are the tax dodging oil companies and the politicians they own. Please send a letter to your representative and tell them to vote NO on HR 5682 by clicking the link. This from the LVC / +Gene Karpinski, League of Conservation Voters 

League of Conservation Voters

Urgent Action Needed: KXL Could Pass Tomorrow!
There’s literally no time to waste, so I’m going to get right to it: The Keystone XL pipeline, the massive environmental threat that we’ve been battling against for years, will be voted on in the House tomorrow. A Senate vote is also on the way, so now more than ever we need our voices to be heard if we are going to stop this pipeline.
You and I know the facts — Keystone poses a huge risk to our lands, water, climate, and our planet’s future. Tar sands oil is the dirtiest fuel on the planet, and with an atrocious safety record for the company behind Keystone XL, spills in America’s heartland could be imminent. There’s no question about it: Keystone is all risk and no reward. We have just hours to act.
Our country has relied on dirty fossil fuels for too long. There was a time when it seemed there was no way around using fossil fuels for energy, but that’s not the case anymore. So why are so many members of Congress hell-bent on continuing to invest in dirty oil?
There have been enormous advancements in clean energy, and President Obama has made it clear that our country needs to act on climate change now. From the EPA’s historic Clean Power Plan to Tuesday’s agreement with China to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, our country is moving forward in the fight against climate change.
But if Keystone XL is built, we will be taking a giant step backward. We will be playing right into Big Oil’s hands — keeping us addicted to oil is exactly what they need to pad their wallets even more. We can fight back, but we have to act now before the House votes tomorrow.
Time and time again we have marched, petitioned, and DEMANDED that the Keystone XL pipeline be rejected. And the incredible thing is that President Obama has heard us. That’s why when he announced his climate action plan last year, he emphasized that Keystone’s impact on climate change should determine whether or not the pipeline is built. Now we need to make sure our representatives in the House hear us too. There’s not a moment to spare — contact your member right now and tell them to vote NO on Keystone XL.
Craig, thank you for keeping up the fight. We can stop Keystone, but we can’t do it without you.
Kristin Signature
Kristin Brown
Director of Digital Strategy
League of Conservation Voters

1920 L Street, NW Suite 800
Washington, DC 20036
202-785-8683
lcv-optim-share-donate.png

05 September 2014

Think the Southwest’s Drought Is Bad Now? It Could Last a Generation or More & Should You Grill With Charcoal or Gas? ECONUNDRUMS YOUR ENVIRONMENTAL DILEMMAS SOLVED 3&1SEP14

THE drought in California and the American West, especially the Southwest, is extremely bad, and believe it or not it is only going to get worse. The growing conflict between agriculture and urban demands for water is getting worse, and it is only a matter of time before violence erupts somewhere over water allocations. The California legislature has shown great political courage in passing legislation (the Gov Brown needs to sign) regulating ground water pumping. While governments and industries alike should have already been investing in water desalination facilities along the West coast it is not to late to do so. BANS ON FRACKING must be imposed in all areas experiencing drought. FRACKING requires huge amounts of water these areas can not afford to loose. FRACKING pollutes surface and ground water and increases air pollution in the areas it is used. The environmental and economic damage in drought areas from FRACKING far exceeds any benefit from such drilling.  Urban areas must do more to limit water consumption like xenotropic landscaping and minimal water use appliances with heavy, mandatory fines for violations. Government must be ready with tax credits and low interest loans for consumers installing American made minimal use appliances and converting their property to xenotropic landscaping. Farmers must convert their crops to those appropriate for the region and minimize their use of water with conservation methods like drip irrigation. If more water than what is delivered by drip irrigation is needed for their crops then another crop must be considered. The government must be ready to offer financial assistance (tax breaks and low interest loans) for farmers to convert to minimal water use methods and crops. These methods will require a massive amount of spending and subsidies by government and corporate America, including big agribusiness, must pay their fair share. To continue on, taking only the minimal action required will hasten the environmental and economic disaster that is fast approaching with a price tag that will far exceed the cost of implementing drastic water use reform now. From +Mother Jones .....

Think the Southwest’s Drought Is Bad Now? It Could Last a Generation or More

| Wed Sep. 3, 2014 5:55 AM EDT
Irrigation pipes on Southern California farmland.
Late-summer 2014 has brought uncomfortable news for residents of the US Southwest—and I'm not talking about 109-degree heat in population centers like Phoenix.
A new study by Cornell University, the University of Arizona, and the US Geological Survey researchers looked at the deep historical record (tree rings, etc.) and the latest climate change models to estimate the likelihood of major droughts in the Southwest over the next century. The results are as soothing as a thick wool sweater on a midsummer desert hike.
The researchers concluded that odds of a decadelong drought are "at least 80 percent." The chances of a "megadrought," one lasting 35 or more years, stands at somewhere between 20 percent and 50 percent, depending on how severe climate change turns out to be. And the prospects for an "unprecedented 50-year megadrought"—one "worse than anything seen during the last 2000 years"­—checks in at a nontrivial 5 to 10 percent.
To the right there's a map, pulled from the study, showing that the swath of land in question and its risk of a 35-year drought. It extends from Southern California clear to West Texas, encompassing population centers like San Diego, Phoenix, Tucson, and Albuquerque, along with a large chunk of the troubled US-Mexico border. (Note that in northern Mexico, drought prospects are even higher.)
This (paradoxically) chilling assessment comes on the heels of another study (study; my summary), this one released in early August by University of California-Irvine and NASA researchers, on the Colorado River, the lifeblood of a vast chunk of the Southwest. As many as 40 million people rely on the Colorado for drinking water, including residents of Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Phoenix, Tucson, and San Diego. It also irrigates the highly productive winter farms of California's Imperial Valley and Arizona's Yuma County, which produce upwards of 80 percent of the nation's winter vegetables.
The researchers analyzed satellite measurements of the Earth's mass and found that the region's aquifers had undergone a much-larger-than-expected drawdown over the past decade—the region's farms and municipalities responded to drought-reduced flows from the Colorado River by dropping wells and tapping almost 53 million acre-feet of underground water between December 2004 and November 2013—equal to about 1.5 full Lake Meads drained off in just nine years, a rate the study's lead researcher, Jay Famiglietti, calls "alarming."
Considering how much of the Colorado River Basin, which encompasses swaths of Utah, Colorado, California, Arizona, and New Mexico, are desert, it's probably not wise to rapidly drain aquifers, since there's little prospect that they'll refill anytime soon. And when you consider that that the region faces high odds of a coming megadrought, the results are even more frightening. (Just before Labor Day, over fierce opposition from farm interests, the California Legislature passed legislation that would regulate groundwater pumping—something that has never been done on a statewide basis in California before. Gov. Jerry Brown is expected to sign it into law.)
Yet another study, this one released in mid-August by researchers from the Scripps Institution of Oceanography and the US Geological Survey and covered by my colleague Julia Lurie here, found that the drought now gripping most of California has been so severe that it has caused the state's mountain ranges to rise by as much as a half inch since 2013 alone. That's because water, in the form of snow on mountain peaks and flow in streams, weighs down on the tectonic plate upon which the mountains rest. When it's not replaced, as happens during a drought, the plate rises "like an uncoiled spring," as the Scripps Institution of Oceanography put it in a press release. Scripps added, thankfully, that the "uplift has virtually no effect on the San Andreas fault and therefore does not increase the risk of earthquakes." Whew.
But the "uplift effect" doesn't just happen in mountain areas. The researchers estimate that across the West, loss of surface water has caused the land to rise 0.15 of an inch since 2013. Such a tangible change over so short a time illustrates the "the dire hydrological state of the West," the Scripps press release states.

14 February 2014

Thursday 20 FEB 14 in Baltimore: Major rally to oppose Cove Point

OPPOSITION to dominion resources' proposed Cove Point, Maryland liquified natural gas export facility is growing.  There will be a major rally in Baltimore on Thursday, 20FEB14 against Cove Point, see the below to RSVP. If you can't attend, you can still lend your voice against the proposal by submitting a public comment (see my post A Big Fracking Lie & Speak out against Dominion's Cove Point fracked gas export terminal 21JAN&13FEB14 http://bucknacktssordidtawdryblog.blogspot.com/2014/02/a-big-fracking-lie-speak-out-against.html ). This from Credo Action.....

Thursday in Baltimore: Major rally to oppose Cove Point
Cove Point is one of the worst fracking projects ever proposed for the East Coast. Our allies in Maryland are organizing a major rally on Thursday in Baltimore to put pressure on Governor O'Malley and the state Public Service Commission to reject this outrageous project -- will you join them?
Click below to RSVP:
RSVP ►
Cove Point is one of the worst fracking projects ever proposed for the East Coast. If completed, this fracked gas export facility will generate huge quantities of carbon pollution and encourage massively expanded fracking throughout Appalachia by giving the gas industry access to major foreign markets.1 2
Maryland Governor O'Malley and the state Public Service Commission must sign off on key permits, and so far they haven't taken a public stance on Cove Point. Governor O'Malley has unambiguous 2016 presidential ambitions, and is positioning himself as a progressive and environmental champion, so if we speak out loudly enough we may be able to pressure him to act.
Our allies in Maryland are organizing a major rally on Thursday in Baltimore to put pressure on Governor O'Malley and the Public Service Commission to reject this outrageous project. Activists from across the region will be there to speak out -- will you join them?
What: Rally to stop Cove Point
When: Thursday, February 20, noon-1:30pm
Where: War Memorial Plaza, corner of N. Gay St. & E. Fayette St., Baltimore, MD 21202
Click here to RSVP for the rally.
The federal government has already granted Cove Point a license to export fracked gas overseas to countries like China and India. Worse, the Obama administration gave Cove Point a free pass by opting for a less stringent environmental review that will speed approval of the project.
Every step in the process of extracting, transporting and burning fracked gas endangers public health and safety and exacerbates climate change. The entire process is so dirty and energy-intensive that exporting gas is about as bad as or worse than burning coal. And with about 20 similar fracked gas export facilities pending approval across the country, approving Cove Point would add momentum to the fracking industry's push to turn the United States into a global hub for gas exports.
The facilities required to supercool and liquefy fracked gas are so energy-intensive that Cove Point developer Dominion will need to build a brand new 130-megawatt power plant just to power them. Cove Point's liquefaction facility alone would produce more carbon pollution than all but three of the state's coal-fired power plants. And to ship gas from fracking operations across the region to Cove Point will require building a massive network of explosion-prone pipelines and polluting compressor stations.
It's clear that only the fracking industry will gain if the Cove Point export terminal is approved. But we won't be able to stop Cove Point unless we speak out. I hope you'll be at the rally.
Click here to RSVP for the rally.
Thanks for fighting fracking.
Zack Malitz, Campaign Manager
CREDO Action from Working Assets
Click below to RSVP:
RSVP ►
1. "Stop Fracked Gas Exports at Cove Point," Chesapeake Climate Action Network
2. Bill McKibben and Mike Tidwell, "A Big Fracking Lie," Politico, January 21, 2014