NORTON META TAG

Showing posts with label ground water. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ground water. Show all posts

05 September 2014

Think the Southwest’s Drought Is Bad Now? It Could Last a Generation or More & Should You Grill With Charcoal or Gas? ECONUNDRUMS YOUR ENVIRONMENTAL DILEMMAS SOLVED 3&1SEP14

THE drought in California and the American West, especially the Southwest, is extremely bad, and believe it or not it is only going to get worse. The growing conflict between agriculture and urban demands for water is getting worse, and it is only a matter of time before violence erupts somewhere over water allocations. The California legislature has shown great political courage in passing legislation (the Gov Brown needs to sign) regulating ground water pumping. While governments and industries alike should have already been investing in water desalination facilities along the West coast it is not to late to do so. BANS ON FRACKING must be imposed in all areas experiencing drought. FRACKING requires huge amounts of water these areas can not afford to loose. FRACKING pollutes surface and ground water and increases air pollution in the areas it is used. The environmental and economic damage in drought areas from FRACKING far exceeds any benefit from such drilling.  Urban areas must do more to limit water consumption like xenotropic landscaping and minimal water use appliances with heavy, mandatory fines for violations. Government must be ready with tax credits and low interest loans for consumers installing American made minimal use appliances and converting their property to xenotropic landscaping. Farmers must convert their crops to those appropriate for the region and minimize their use of water with conservation methods like drip irrigation. If more water than what is delivered by drip irrigation is needed for their crops then another crop must be considered. The government must be ready to offer financial assistance (tax breaks and low interest loans) for farmers to convert to minimal water use methods and crops. These methods will require a massive amount of spending and subsidies by government and corporate America, including big agribusiness, must pay their fair share. To continue on, taking only the minimal action required will hasten the environmental and economic disaster that is fast approaching with a price tag that will far exceed the cost of implementing drastic water use reform now. From +Mother Jones .....

Think the Southwest’s Drought Is Bad Now? It Could Last a Generation or More

| Wed Sep. 3, 2014 5:55 AM EDT
Irrigation pipes on Southern California farmland.
Late-summer 2014 has brought uncomfortable news for residents of the US Southwest—and I'm not talking about 109-degree heat in population centers like Phoenix.
A new study by Cornell University, the University of Arizona, and the US Geological Survey researchers looked at the deep historical record (tree rings, etc.) and the latest climate change models to estimate the likelihood of major droughts in the Southwest over the next century. The results are as soothing as a thick wool sweater on a midsummer desert hike.
The researchers concluded that odds of a decadelong drought are "at least 80 percent." The chances of a "megadrought," one lasting 35 or more years, stands at somewhere between 20 percent and 50 percent, depending on how severe climate change turns out to be. And the prospects for an "unprecedented 50-year megadrought"—one "worse than anything seen during the last 2000 years"­—checks in at a nontrivial 5 to 10 percent.
To the right there's a map, pulled from the study, showing that the swath of land in question and its risk of a 35-year drought. It extends from Southern California clear to West Texas, encompassing population centers like San Diego, Phoenix, Tucson, and Albuquerque, along with a large chunk of the troubled US-Mexico border. (Note that in northern Mexico, drought prospects are even higher.)
This (paradoxically) chilling assessment comes on the heels of another study (study; my summary), this one released in early August by University of California-Irvine and NASA researchers, on the Colorado River, the lifeblood of a vast chunk of the Southwest. As many as 40 million people rely on the Colorado for drinking water, including residents of Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Phoenix, Tucson, and San Diego. It also irrigates the highly productive winter farms of California's Imperial Valley and Arizona's Yuma County, which produce upwards of 80 percent of the nation's winter vegetables.
The researchers analyzed satellite measurements of the Earth's mass and found that the region's aquifers had undergone a much-larger-than-expected drawdown over the past decade—the region's farms and municipalities responded to drought-reduced flows from the Colorado River by dropping wells and tapping almost 53 million acre-feet of underground water between December 2004 and November 2013—equal to about 1.5 full Lake Meads drained off in just nine years, a rate the study's lead researcher, Jay Famiglietti, calls "alarming."
Considering how much of the Colorado River Basin, which encompasses swaths of Utah, Colorado, California, Arizona, and New Mexico, are desert, it's probably not wise to rapidly drain aquifers, since there's little prospect that they'll refill anytime soon. And when you consider that that the region faces high odds of a coming megadrought, the results are even more frightening. (Just before Labor Day, over fierce opposition from farm interests, the California Legislature passed legislation that would regulate groundwater pumping—something that has never been done on a statewide basis in California before. Gov. Jerry Brown is expected to sign it into law.)
Yet another study, this one released in mid-August by researchers from the Scripps Institution of Oceanography and the US Geological Survey and covered by my colleague Julia Lurie here, found that the drought now gripping most of California has been so severe that it has caused the state's mountain ranges to rise by as much as a half inch since 2013 alone. That's because water, in the form of snow on mountain peaks and flow in streams, weighs down on the tectonic plate upon which the mountains rest. When it's not replaced, as happens during a drought, the plate rises "like an uncoiled spring," as the Scripps Institution of Oceanography put it in a press release. Scripps added, thankfully, that the "uplift has virtually no effect on the San Andreas fault and therefore does not increase the risk of earthquakes." Whew.
But the "uplift effect" doesn't just happen in mountain areas. The researchers estimate that across the West, loss of surface water has caused the land to rise 0.15 of an inch since 2013. Such a tangible change over so short a time illustrates the "the dire hydrological state of the West," the Scripps press release states.

20 June 2014

Pennsylvania Instructed Its Employees To Ignore Residents Sickened By Drilling & Risky Gas Drilling Threatens Health, Water supplies 20JUN14

PENNSYLVANIA used to be a Commonwealth  ( :  a nation, state, or other political unit: as
a :  one founded on law and united by compact or tacit agreement of the people for the common good
b :  one in which supreme authority is vested in the people) but no more. Decades of control of the legislature by corporations and the rich who have bought the loyalty of the majority of the politicians in Harrisburg has destroyed the education system, workers rights and protections, the environment, the health care system and the Commonwealth's infrastructure to the point while people were once proud to be citizens of Pennsylvania now it seems they leave as soon as they can. It is a sad state of affairs when the governing of the Commonwealth has become an act of political hypocrisy as nothing seems to be accomplished in Harrisburg that is for the common good of the people of Pennsylvania. The current governor, tom corbett r tb, has willing practiced this hypocrisy during his political career, as Commonwealth Attorney investigating Penn State child molesters to passage of the discriminatory voter I.D. law (struck down by the courts) to waging war on a woman's right of choice
and now this report of a coverup through denial of knowledge of citizens illnesses due to fracking. But it must be pointed out, the citizens of what was the Great Commonwealth of Pennsylvania share the blame for this decay and degradation because they elected these fools or were so lazy and ignorant they didn't bother to vote. From +Think Progress  & +NRDC (Natural Resources Defense Council) .....

By Andrew Breiner
"Pennsylvania Instructed Its Employees To Ignore Residents Sickened By Drilling"

Year 2010: 1386 gas wells, 4718 well permits.
The Pennsylvania Department of Health instructed its employees never to talk to residents who complained of negative health effects from fracking, StateImpact Pennsylvania reported Thursday. Two retired employees of the department detailed restrictions on attending meetings, lists of topics they could not discuss, and a general departmental hostility to the idea of health problems linked to shale gas drilling. The state’s governor, Tom Corbett, declined to comment for StateImpact Pennsylvania’s story.
Pennsylvania has had more than 6,000 hydraulic fracturing wells drilled within the last six years, and zero state studies on their health impacts. In Pennsylvania, and near fracking operations across the country, people have won settlements from fossil fuel companies after being sickened. In many cases the drilling company imposes a gag order to prevent sickened people from spreading the word about what caused their illness and building the case that fracking has negative health effects.
In 2011 Pennsylvania’s Marcellus Shale Advisory Commission recommended a registry to collect health data from people living near fracking operations. Three years later, it still doesn’t exist. Across the country in Colorado, legislators tried to commission a study on the health effects of living near drilling, but fossil fuel advocates ensured its demise. Doctors want more data on health effects of fracking, but the interests of the drillers usually win out.
A Texas case where a family was sickened by toxic emissions from gas and oil drilling operations shows why so many families accept a settlement even with a restrictive gag order. The Parrs filed suit against Aruba Petroleum in March 2011, saying they were “under constant, perpetual, and inescapable assault of Defendants’ releases, spills, emissions, and discharges of hazardous gases, chemicals, and industrial/hazardous wastes.” A jury awarded the Parrs $2.9 million, but even after a judge upheld the jury’s verdict this Thursday, Aruba is expected to appeal and drag the case out longer. If it stands, it will be one of the first-ever cases in the U.S. where a drilling company was successfully sued for sickening people.
When the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality sent an inspector to look into the Parrs’ case and collect air samples, he was sickened as well. The Texas Attorney General’s office sued, and Aruba ended up settling for $108,000.
The Pennsylvania Department of Health’s hostility to examining the health effects of fracking is just the latest development in a series of policies and laws that make it easier to make money from fracking — at the expense of public health. For instance, a Pennsylvania law makes it illegal for doctors to tell their patients which fracking chemicals are poisoning them, to protect the secret blends they inject into the earth. Drillers like it because they assert it helps them compete against one another. But it also makes it very difficult for residents to build the case for the health effects of a particular chemical, or even the health effects of fracking generally.
As Pennsylvania State Senator Daylin Leach (D) told Mother Jones in March of last year, “The importance of keeping it as a proprietary secret seems minimal when compared to letting the public know what chemicals they and their children are being exposed to.”

Switchboard

NRDC's staff blog

Pennsylvania ignoring fracking health reports
posted by Amy Mall, 6/20/14
Another deeply troubling story about the failure of our government leaders to protect Americans from ...
NYS Senate Must Enact Three-Year Moratorium on Fracking Now
posted by Kate Sinding, 6/17/14
The mad end-of-session rush in Albany is upon us, the time of year for frenetic horse-trading and multiple ...
New report: BLM using outdated rules and not inspecting priority wells
posted by Amy Mall, 6/13/14
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report in May on BLM's oversight of oil and gas ...
What Kind of "Impact" Has Cabot Oil and Gas Had on Pennsylvania?
posted by Daniel Raichel, 6/9/14
Just about a week ago, Cabot Oil and Gas Corporation, the company associated with widespread methane ...
Leaky Oil and Gas Wells Threaten the Environment and Public Health and Safety
posted by Briana Mordick, 6/5/14
A new report from researchers at the University of Waterloo in Canada highlights a serious problem for ...

Related NRDC Webpages:



RISKY GAS DRILLING THREATENS HEALTH, WATER SUPPLIES

The rapid expansion of natural gas drilling across the nation endangers human health and the environment.

Gas DrillingDrilling of the Marcellus Shale has already begun in nearby Dimock Township, Pennsylvania, and so have the first reports of dangerous spills. In September 2009, three spills of hydraulic fracturing fluid totaling more than 8,000 gallons polluted local wetlands and a creek, causing a fish kill.
photo: © J Henry Fair Photography
The oil and gas industry is seeking to expand natural gas production across the nation, as new technology makes it easier to extract gas from previously inaccessible sites. Over the last decade, the industry has drilled thousands of new wells in the Rocky Mountain region and in the South. It is expanding operations in the eastern United States as well, setting its sights most recently on a 600-mile-long rock formation called the Marcellus Shale, which stretches from West Virginia to western New York.
Nearly all natural gas extraction today involves a technique called hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, in which dangerous chemicals are mixed with large quantities of water and sand and injected into wells at extremely high pressure. Fracking is a suspect in polluted drinking water in Arkansas, Colorado, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia and Wyoming, where residents have reported changes in water quality or quantity following fracturing operations.
NRDC opposes expanded fracking until effective safeguards are in place.
Natural gas producers have been running roughshod over communities across the country with their extraction and production activities for too long, resulting in contaminated water supplies, dangerous air pollution, destroyed streams, and devastated landscapes. Weak safeguards and inadequate oversight fail to protect our communities from harm by the rapid expansion of fossil fuel production using hydraulic fracturing or "fracking."
Americans shouldn't have to accept unsafe drinking water just because natural gas burns more cleanly than coal. Many companies don't play by the rules that do exist and the industry has used its political power to escape accountability for its actions, leaving the American people unprotected. And no industry can claim to be part of the solution if it supports exemptions from basic laws designed to ensure that we have clean water, clean air, and the ability to make our voices heard.
NRDC works to build a healthier energy future -- one that is centered on clean, safe, renewable sources of power, used efficiently. Energy efficiency and renewable energy must be our country's top energy priorities because they are the quickest, cleanest and cheapest solutions to global warming and other pollution problems.
We also support strong safeguards for production of all energy sources to minimize risks to our health. Since natural gas burns more cleanly than other fossil fuels, it can contribute to protecting public health when it is used to displace dirtier fuels like coal.
NRDC supports establishing a fully effective system of safeguards for hydraulic fracturing to protect our health and land and is committed to working with the federal government, states, communities and industry to put these safeguards into place right away.
These safeguards include:
  1. Putting the most sensitive lands, including critical watersheds, completely off limits to fracking;
  2. Not allowing leaky systems by setting clean air standards that ensure methane leaks are well under one percent of production to reduce global warming pollution, and requiring green completions and other techniques to reduce air pollution;
  3. Mandating sound well drilling and construction standards by requiring the strongest well siting, casing and cementing and other drilling best practices;
  4. Protecting the landscape, air, and water from pollution by closing Clean Air, Clean Water and Safe Drinking Water loopholes, reducing toxic waste, and holding toxic oil and gas waste to the same standards as other types of hazardous waste, funding robust inspection and enforcement programs, and disclosing fully all chemicals;
  5. Using gas to replace dirtier fossil fuels like coal by prioritizing renewables and efficiency, implementing recently established mercury, sulfur and other clean air standards, and setting strong power plant carbon pollution standards; and
  6. Allowing communities to protect themselves and their future by restricting fracking through comprehensive zoning and planning.

14 January 2014

Something funny in the water (from fracking?) 14JAN14

IT is amazing the EPA would stop investigations in drinking water contamination and fracking in three communities across the nation, especially in the wake of the water pollution disaster this last week in West Virginia. Clean drinking water is priceless, and there are laws to protect our water the EPA is supposed to enforce. We need to force the EPA to reopen these investigations and if fracking is found to be responsible then the companies must be fined and forced to clean up their mess and provide clean water in these communities and be financially responsible for the health care cost of those made sick from this polluted water. Please sign the petition from the NRDC to the EPA telling them to reopen these investigations, click the link. And for more on fracking and help for communities fighting it and / or dealing with the aftermath do a search on this blog.....
Natural Resources Defense Council Activist Alert


Protect our water from fracking

brown water

Take Action Now



A troubling trend is putting our drinking water in peril.

Residents in Dimock, PA, Pavilion, WY, and Parker County, TX noticed problems with their drinking water. When their state officials wouldn’t help, the EPA agreed to investigate.

But the EPA abruptly pulled out in all three communities, despite evidence of water contamination. Last month, the EPA’s own internal watchdog said that the risk faced by residents in Parker County is still unknown.

The EPA is supposed to protect us from pollution, but it seems to be backing down in response to pressure from oil and gas companies

Demand safe water for all. Tell EPA head Gina McCarthy to reopen investigations into groundwater contamination linked to fracking.

I’ve worked for seven years protecting our land and communities from harmful oil and gas operations. I’ve seen it all from irresponsible corporations—but this is an alarming trend from the EPA, the agency in charge of protecting human health and the environment.

When the EPA fails to act on science in controversial fracking-related cases across the country, we’re left defenseless from the dangers of fracking. Families shouldn’t be on their own when it comes to making sure their drinking water is safe.

Email Administrator McCarthy and demand that the EPA reopen investigations into contaminated water from fracking.

Thank you,

Amy Mall
Senior Policy Analyst, NRDC

Take Action Now

20 December 2013

Hormone-Disrupting Chemicals Found At Fracking Sites Linked To Cancer, Infertility: Study & What Does the Data Actually Tell Us about the Risks Associated with Fracking? & Science, Democracy, and Fracking: A Guide for Community Residents and Policy Makers Facing Decisions over Hydraulic Fracturing 20DEZ&OKT13

THIS is a cartoon from 2011, and with this report turns out our fears were justified. From the Union of Concerned Scientist and HuffPost.....

fracking chemicals
Hormone-disrupting chemicals linked to cancer, infertility and a slew of other health problems have been found in water samples collected at and near hydraulic fracturing, or "fracking," sites in Colorado, according to a new study published in the journal Endocrinology this week.
Researchers say they found elevated levels of these chemicals -- known as endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) -- in surface water and groundwater samples collected in the state's Garfield County, a fracking hotspot with more than 10,000 natural gas wells.
Water samples taken from the Colorado River, a drainage basin for the region, were also found to have significantly higher-than-normal levels of EDCs, the researchers said.
EDCs, which have the ability to interfere with normal hormone action, have been linked to a number of health issues. Last year, the World Health Organization issued a report highlighting the health risks associated with the chemicals, including cancer, infertility and impaired neural and immune function. Previous studies have also suggested that EDCs may have adverse effects on the reproductive system in both women and men.
"With fracking on the rise, populations may face greater health risks from increased endocrine-disrupting chemical exposure," Susan Nagel, a veteran endocrinologist at the University of Missouri School of Medicine, told the Los Angeles Times. Nagel was the lead author of the recent study on fracking and EDCs.
In 2010 and again in 2012, Nagel and a team of researchers collected several water samples at five natural gas sites in Garfield County, where fracking wastewater spills are known to have occurred in the last few years. The researchers then tested the samples for four different classes of EDCs. "Of the 39 unique water samples, 89 percent, 41 percent, 12 percent, and 46 percent exhibited estrogenic, anti-estrogenic, androgenic, and anti-androgenic activities, respectively," the report says. The team also gathered water samples from the Colorado river, as well as from areas in Garfield County that are located a significant distance away from natural gas wells. Other samples came from an area in Missouri where there is no fracking.
The researchers said water samples collected from the spill sites and the Colorado river had significantly higher levels of EDCs than those gathered from the control sites in Garden County and Missouri.
Water can contain small amounts of estrogenic substances naturally. However, "Nagel said that although estrogenic substances can be found naturally occurring in water, she did not know of similar sources of anti-estrogenic or anti-androgenic chemicals," the Times reports.
Troublingly, Nagel told The Huffington Post that the people living in the areas of Garfield County where the samples were taken all primarily get their water from local wells. This means that some residents in the area may very well be consuming water laden with these higher levels of EDCs.
"This is a canary in a coal mine that we need to pay attention to," Nagel told the HuffPost of the findings. "And it is absolutely a cause for concern."
Nagel added, however, that more research needs to be conducted to confirm the link between the EDCs found in the samples and fracking.
In their study, the researchers did not test their samples for specific fracking chemicals. Nagel said that a similar study should be conducted again, but with a larger sample size.
Fracking is a process in which millions of gallons of water, sand and chemicals are blasted underground to break apart rock and release oil and gas. "The process is exempt from some regulations that are part of the Safe Drinking Water Act, and energy companies do not have to disclose the chemicals they use if they consider that information a trade secret," the Times writes.
In 2011, however, a Congressional report revealed a list of some 750 chemicals and compounds that are used for fracking. A ProPublica report said at the time that the list includes "29 chemicals that are either known or possible carcinogens or are regulated by the federal government because of other risks to human health."
Nagel told the HuffPost that researchers have since found more than 100 known or suspected EDCs in this list, as well.
With billions of dollars on the line, fracking -- and its impact on the environment and public health -- has been a contentious and controversial issue for years. Gas and oil lobbyists maintain that the practice is environmentally sound and perfectly safe (an industry lobbyist told the Times that Nagel's study was "inflammatory"), while environmental groups including Food and Water Watch and the Sierra Club have continued to sound the alarm on fracking's possible effects on our health and that of our planet.
Part of the problem is that studies looking into fracking's effects on public health remain inconclusive and preliminary. Still, there has been no shortage of anecdotal evidence of fracking's impact.
Earlier this year, for instance, it was reported that residents in Bokoshe, Okla., had filed a class-action suit against gas companies that had been fracking in the area. Oklahoma's News 6 reported at the time that "hundreds of millions of gallons" of fracking wastewater had been discharged at Bokoshe. Residents say this activity has triggered a spate of health issues, including cancer, in the town.
 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/12/20/fracking-chemicals-cancer-study_n_4468243.html?ref=topbar
Around the Web:
Hormone-disrupting chemicals found in water at fracking sites
Fracking chemicals can disrupt hormones
Fracking chemicals could cause infertility, cancer and birth defects, study finds
Chemicals linked to infertility, birth defects and cancer found at fracking sites
Chemicals Found In Fracking Fluid Could Give You Cancer
Fracking chemicals linked to hormone disruption
Chemicals used in 'fracking' can disrupt human hormone function, MU ...
Chemicals used in fracking may disrupt hormone function, study finds
Endocrine-disrupting chemicals found at fracking sites

What Does the Data Actually Tell Us about the Risks Associated with Fracking?

Ask a Scientist - October 2013
Patrick Simon of Oscada, MI, asks "With all the polarized discussion about fracking in the news lately, what does the evidence and data actually tell us about the risks associated with this extraction process for oil and natural gas?" and is answered by Dr. Gretchen Goldman, an analyst with Center for Science and Democracy at the Union of Concerned Scientists.  
Technological advances such as horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing (commonly known as “fracking”) have resulted in the rapid expansion of unconventional oil and gas extraction from shale and other tight rock formations that had been previously deemed inaccessible or too costly to tap. While these techniques have been used for several decades to extract oil from shale in Texas and elsewhere, fracking for oil and natural gas has now expanded into some 28 U.S. states, creating new risks in new places.
One of the risks is the potential for drinking-water contamination. Many fracking sites around the country have operated successfully with no known water contamination issues. But the risk of serious problems is real and borne out by the evidence. We have already seen documented cases of groundwater contamination near oil and gas wells from fracking fluids as well as from gases, including methane and volatile organic compounds. Surface waters also face contamination risks from potential spills and leaks of chemical additives, diesel or other fluids from equipment on site, or leaks of wastewater from facilities for storage, treatment, and disposal. Water quantity issues can also present risks: the large volume of water used in fracking operations has already raised concerns about water availability in some water-scarce regions.
Water issues may get more attention in the media, but unconventional oil and gas development also poses documented risks from air pollution. Some areas where drilling occurs have experienced increases in concentrations of hazardous air pollutants, particulate matter, and ozone. Air pollutants are emitted during the well completion phase, when most of the water and chemicals flow back from a well, and during onsite processing to separate the fuels from other substances. And some communities have faced significant air pollution from the increased truck traffic carrying water and materials to and from the well site.
Earthquake risks are also a serious consideration. Oil and gas production using hydraulic fracturing is not generally associated with earthquakes detectable at the surface. Rather, concern about seismic activity stems primarily from the deep injection of wastewater from hydraulic fracturing operations. This wastewater injection has been linked to large earthquakes, such as one earthquake on November 5, 2011 that was felt in 17 states.
As serious as these particular environmental risks may be, communities must also weigh the socioeconomic impacts of oil and gas development that use fracking, considering effects on the social fabric, crime rates, public services, and community resources. Such impacts are complex and will be different for different localities. If you live in a community considering fracking, it is important to question decision makers and the companies involved on a wide range of issues until you are satisfied with the answers. To help communities ask the right questions, UCS has developed a toolkit for communities faced with decisions around fracking. It draws upon advice and experience from leading experts and community stakeholders who attended a forum about fracking held by the Center for Science and Democracy this summer in Los Angeles, California.
For even more details on the evidence about risks associated with unconventional oil and gas development, and the challenges communities face in making science-informed decisions about fracking, check out the new UCS report, Toward an Evidence-Base Fracking Debate: Science, Democracy, and Community Right to Know in Unconventional Oil and Gas Development.
As an analyst for the Scientific Integrity Initiative at the UCS Center for Science and Democracy, Gretchen Goldman researches influences and interference in how science is used in federal government policies. Dr. Goldman holds a Ph.D. and M.S. in Environmental Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology and a B.S. in Atmospheric Science from Cornell University.
http://www.ucsusa.org/publications/ask/2013/fracking.html

Science, Democracy, and Fracking: A Guide for Community Residents and Policy Makers Facing Decisions over Hydraulic Fracturing

Recent advances in hydraulic fracturing ( or “fracking”) technology leading to a rapid expansion in domestic oil and gas production.  The pace of growth is driving many communities to make decisions without access to comprehensive and reliable scientific information about the potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing on their local air and water quality, com­munity health, safety, economy, environment, and overall quality of life.
If you are an active citizen in a community facing decisions about fracking, this toolkit is for you. It provides practi­cal advice and resources to help you identify the critical questions to ask and get the scientific information you need when weighing the prospects and risks of shale oil or shale gas development in your region.
This toolkit can improve decision making on fracking by helping you to:
  • Identify critical issues about the potential impacts of fracking in your area, and how to obtain answers to your questions
  • Distinguish reliable information from misinformation or spin—and help your neighbors and local decision makers do the same
  • Identify and communicate with scientists, journalists, policy makers, and community groups that should be part of the public discussion
  • Identify and engage with the key actors in your community to influence oil and gas policy at the local and state level

What Are People Saying About Fracking?

If you're curious about the current state of the national conversation about fracking, you might find the results of our post-forum survey enlightening. UCS blogger Deborah Bailin looks at the language respondents used and explores the implications for policy makers and activists.

Appendices

Take Action Now! 

Help ensure that your community is making informed decisions on hydraulic fracturing by sharing our informational toolkit with your state legislator.