NORTON META TAG

Showing posts with label gitmo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gitmo. Show all posts

14 April 2025

8 years of suffering under Barack Obama 10JUL17



 MAGAT cultist say we suffered for 8 years under Obama. If this is suffering bring it on!!! From the Anderson News the sentence I hear most from well-meaning, conservative friends since President Trump’s election is this: “We suffered 8 years under Barack Obama.”

8 years of suffering under Barack Obama


Fair enough. Let’s take a look.

The day Obama took office, the Dow closed at 7,949 points. Eight years later, the Dow had almost tripled.

General Motors and Chrysler were on the brink of bankruptcy, with Ford not far behind, and their failure, along with their supply chains, would have meant the loss of millions of jobs. Obama pushed through a controversial, $8o billion bailout to save the car industry. The U.S. car industry survived, started making money again, and the entire $80 billion was paid back, with interest.

While we remain vulnerable to lone-wolf attacks, no foreign terrorist organization has successfully executed a mass attack here since 9/11.

Obama ordered the raid that killed Osama Bin Laden.

He drew down the number of troops from 180,000 in Iraq and Afghanistan to just 15,000, and increased funding for the Department of Veterans Affairs.

He launched a program called Opening Doors which, since 2010, has led to a 47 percent decline in the number of homeless veterans.

He set a record 73 straight months of private-sector job growth.

Due to Obama’s regulatory policies, greenhouse gas emissions decreased by 12%, production of renewable energy more than doubled, and our dependence on foreign oil was cut in half.

He signed The Lilly Ledbetter Act, making it easier for women to sue employers for unequal pay.

His Omnibus Public Lands Management Act designated more than 2 million acres as wilderness, creating thousands of miles of trails and protecting over 1,000 miles of rivers.

He reduced the federal deficit from 9.8 percent of GDP in 2009 to 3.2 percent in 2016.

For all the inadequacies of the Affordable Care Act, we seem to have forgotten that, before the ACA, you could be denied coverage for a pre-existing condition and kids could not stay on their parents’ policies up to age 26.

Obama approved a $14.5 billion system to rebuild the levees in New Orleans.

All this, even as our own Mitch McConnell famously asserted that his singular mission would be to block anything President Obama tried to do.

While Obama failed on his campaign pledge to close the prison at Guantanamo Bay, that prison’s population decreased from 242 to around 50.

He expanded funding for embryonic stem cell research, supporting groundbreaking advancement in areas like spinal injury treatment and cancer.

Credit card companies can no longer charge hidden fees or raise interest rates without advance notice.

Most years, Obama threw a 4th of July party for military families. He held babies, played games with children, served barbecue, and led the singing of “Happy Birthday” to his daughter Malia, who was born on July 4.

Welfare spending is down: for every 100 poor families, just 24 receive cash assistance, compared with 64 in 1996.

Obama comforted families and communities following more than a dozen mass shootings. After Sandy Hook, he said, “The majority of those who died today were children, beautiful little kids between the ages of 5 and 10 years old.”

Yet, he never took away anyone’s guns.

He sang Amazing Grace, spontaneously, at the altar.

He was the first president since Eisenhower to serve two terms without personal or political scandal.

He was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.

President Obama was not perfect, as no man and no president is, and you can certainly disagree with his political ideologies. But to say we suffered? If that’s the argument, if this is how we suffered for 8 years under Barack Obama, I have one wish: may we be so fortunate as to suffer 8 more.



24 February 2016

DEMOCRACY NOW! DAILY DIGEST Will Obama's Guantánamo Plan Close the Prison or Just Relocate It to a New ZIP Code? 24FEB16


Stories


President Obama has submitted a plan to Congress to close Guantánamo Bay military prison. Despite Obama's pledge to close the facility as one of his first acts after ... Read More →

We end today's show remembering Black Lives Matter activist MarShawn McCarrel. On February 8, he shot himself to death at the entrance to the Ohio Statehouse in ... Read More →

In his third consecutive victory, billionaire businessman Donald Trump has easily won the Nevada caucus. Trump received 46 percent of the vote, winning most key ... Read More →

Headlines →

19 September 2014

"Three of five detainees swapped (for Bowe Bergdahl) are now ISIS leaders." 15SEP14

WHILE the website this is from has a proven track record of spreading lies and misinformation many racist repiglicans and tea-baggers will continue to spread it around the internet. From +PolitiFact .....

Have three detainees swapped for Bowe Bergdahl now joined ISIS?

This is a screenshot of a portion of a movie-trailer-style video reportedly released by the Islamic State, also known as ISIS or ISIL.
A reader recently sent us a link to a rather startling claim -- that three of the five Guantanamo detainees released by the United States in late May in exchange for Taliban prisoner Bowe Bergdahl have now taken up arms for the Islamic State.
That’s the militant group sometimes known as ISIS or ISIL that has taken control of portions of Iraq and Syria and has beheaded two American journalists and at least one other Westerner.
The claim stems from a website, politicalears.com, that ran a post on Sept. 15, 2014, with the headline, "Three of five detainees swapped are now ISIS leaders." The post, which was also linked to elsewhere on the Internet, goes on to say:
"It is being reported that at least 3 of the 5 detainees involved in the swap have joined ISIS in Syria and Iraq as commanders and are using that rank to usher in an 'Islamic Caliphate' (a Sunni Islamic Theocracy -- contrary to Obama's claims that ISIS is not Islamic).
"The 'Taliban 5' who were transferred from Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to custody in Doha, Qatar, are Mohammad Fazl, Khairullah Khairkhwa, Abdul Haq Wasiq, Norullah Noori, and Mohammad Nabi Omari. They have largely disappeared from view since they were dropped off in Doha, but eyewitnesses place Fazi, Wasiq, and Noori in Iraq and Syria fighting with ISIS."
If true, this would be a major story. But it’s not.
President Barack Obama took significant heat at the time for releasing the five detainees, with some critics also taking issue with the ex-detainees’ new terms of custody -- being transferred to the Persian Gulf state of Qatar with restrictions on their political behavior but relative freedom of movement within the country.
We didn’t find any news reports about what the ex-detainees have been up to recently, but we quickly noticed a couple of red flags that made us suspicious of the email’s claims. For starters, the claim in politicalears.com is entirely unsourced.
In addition, we’d run into politicalears.com before and found the site less than credible. Earlier this month, we looked at its claim that "over 73 percent of all donations raised" from the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge "are going to fundraising, overhead, executive salaries, and external donations." We gave it a Pants on Fire.
Experts who study the region told us the claim was wrong. The ex-detainees "are all in Qatar. This is nonsense," said Barnett R. Rubin, director and senior fellow at New York University’s Center on International Cooperation.
Daveed Gartenstein-Ross, a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, said that while he doesn’t doubt that the ex-detainees are dangerous to United States interests, "there is literally zero evidence" that the detainees have been spotted on the battlefield with ISIS.
Gartenstein-Ross added that the claim doesn’t even make much logical sense and betrays the author’s weak grasp on the region’s nuances.
"The ex-detainees "were in the Afghanistan-Pakistan theater," Gartenstein-Ross said. "Based on these guys’ social networks and who their points of contact were, it’s pretty unlikely they’d be able to quickly find a way to the battlefield and have a command" in the Iraq-Syria border region.
"They are not native Arabic speakers, and it would be unfamiliar terrain culturally. They would face a lot of obstacles," he said.
When we asked the White House if there was any evidence that one or more detainees has joined ISIS, spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden said, "There is no truth to these reports."
Our ruling
Bloggers said that "three of five detainees swapped (for Bowe Bergdahl) are now ISIS leaders." The claim has nonexistent sourcing, has been published by sites with questionable track records for accuracy, and has been knocked down by independent experts. We rate it Pants on Fire.

About this statement:

Published: Thursday, September 18th, 2014 at 2:01 p.m.
Researched by: Louis Jacobson
Edited by: Angie Drobnic Holan
Subjects: Foreign Policy, Military, Terrorism

Sources:

Politicalears.com, "Three of five detainees swapped are now ISIS leaders," Sept. 15, 2014
National Report, "Terrorist Exchanged For Bowe Bergdahl Now Top ISIS Commander," Sept. 16, 2014
Atlas Shrugs, "Treason: GAO Says Five Enemy Combatants Obama Swapped for Bergdahl Was Illegal Deal," Sept. 16, 2014
NBC News, "Ex-Gitmo Militants Are Free To Move Around Qatar: Source," June 3, 2014
Snopes.com, "Exchange Berate," Sept. 16, 2014
Email interview with Daveed Gartenstein-Ross, senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, Sept. 17, 2014
Email interview with Barnett R. Rubin, director and senior fellow at New York University’s Center on International Cooperation, Sept. 16, 2014
Email interview with Caitlin Hayden, White House spokeswoman, Sept. 16, 2014

17 August 2013

John Grisham: When I Found Out My Books Were Banned at Gitmo, I Had to Learn More -- And I Came Away Horrified 13AUG13

FROM renowned American author John Grisham (I think I have read almost all his books) another story of injustice from the American government's war on terror and the U.S. prison at gitmo. From AlterNet.....

Why can't the US apologize for its errors?

 
 
I became curious and tracked down a detainee who enjoys my books. His name is Nabil Hadjarab, and he is a 34-year-old Algerian who grew up in France. He learned to speak French before he learned to speak Arabic. He has close family and friends in France, but not in Algeria. As a kid growing up near Lyon, he was a gifted soccer player and dreamed of playing for Paris Saint-Germain, or another top French club.About two months ago I learned that some of my books had been banned at Guantánamo Bay. Apparently detainees were requesting them, and their lawyers were delivering them to the prison, but they were not being allowed in because of "impermissible content".
Tragically for Nabil, he has spent the past 11 years as a prisoner at Guantánamo, much of the time in solitary confinement. Starting in February, he participated in a hunger strike, which led to his being force-fed.
For reasons that had nothing to do with terror, war or criminal behaviour, Nabil was living peacefully in an Algerian guesthouse in Kabul,Afghanistan, on 11 September 2001. Following the US invasion, word spread among the Arab communities that Afghanistan's Northern Alliance was rounding up and killing foreign Arabs. Nabil and many others headed for Pakistan in a desperate effort to escape the danger. En route, he said, he was wounded in a bombing raid and woke up in a hospital in Jalalabad.
At that time, the US was throwing money at anyone who could deliver an out-of-town Arab found in the region. Nabil was sold to the US for a bounty of $5,000 and taken to an underground prison in Kabul. There he experienced torture for the first time. To house the prisoners of its war on terror, the US military put up a makeshift prison at Bagram air base in Afghanistan. Bagram would quickly become notorious, and make Guantánamo look like a church camp. When Nabil arrived there in January 2002, as one of the first prisoners, there were no walls, only razor-wire cages. In the bitter cold, Nabil was forced to sleep on concrete floors without cover. Food and water were scarce. To and from his frequent interrogations, Nabil was beaten by US soldiers and dragged up and down concrete stairs. Other prisoners died. After a month in Bagram, Nabil was transferred to a prison at Kandahar, where the abuse continued.
Throughout his incarceration in Afghanistan, Nabil strenuously denied any connection to al-Qaida, the Taliban or anyone or any organisation remotely linked to the 9/11 attacks. And the Americans had no proof of his involvement, save for bogus claims implicating him from other prisoners extracted in a Kabul torture chamber. Several US interrogators told him his was a case of mistaken identity. Nonetheless, the US had adopted strict rules for Arabs in custody – all were to be sent to Guantánamo. On 15 February 2002, Nabil was flown to Cuba; shackled, bound and hooded.
Since then, Nabil has been subjected to all the horrors of the Gitmo handbook: sleep deprivation, sensory deprivation, temperature extremes, prolonged isolation, lack of access to sunlight, almost no recreation and limited medical care. In 11 years, he has never been permitted a visit from a family member. For reasons known only to the men who run the prison, Nabil has never been waterboarded. His lawyer believes this is because he knows nothing and has nothing to give.
The US government says otherwise. In documents, military prosecutors say Nabil was staying at a guesthouse run by people with ties to al-Qaida and that he was named by others as someone affiliated with terrorists. But Nabil has never been charged with a crime. Indeed, on two occasions he has been cleared for a "transfer", or release. In 2007, a review board established by President George W Bush recommended his release. Nothing happened. In 2009, another review board established by President Obama recommended his transfer. Nothing happened.
According to his guards, Nabil is a model prisoner. He keeps his head down and avoids trouble. He has perfected his English and insists on speaking the language with his British lawyers. He writes in flawless English. As much as possible, under rather dire circumstances, he has fought to preserve his physical health and mental stability.
In the past seven years, I have met a number of innocent men who were sent to death row, as part of my work with the Innocence Project, which works to free wrongly convicted people. Without exception they have told me that the harshness of isolated confinement is brutal for a cold-blooded murderer who freely admits to his crimes. For an innocent man, though, death row will shove him dangerously close to insanity. You reach a point where it feels impossible to survive another day.
Depressed and driven to the point of desperation, Nabil joined a hunger strike in February. This was not Gitmo's first hunger strike, but it has attracted the most attention. As it gained momentum, and as Nabil and his fellow prisoners got sicker, the Obama administration was backed into a corner. The president has taken justified heat as his bold and eloquent campaign promises to close Gitmo have been forgotten. Suddenly, he was faced with the gruesome prospect of prisoners dropping like flies as they starved themselves to death while the world watched. Instead of releasing Nabil and the other prisoners who have been classified as no threat to the US, the administration decided to prevent suicides by force-feeding the strikers.
Nabil has not been the only "mistake" in our war on terror. Hundreds of other Arabs have been sent to Gitmo, chewed up by the system there, never charged and eventually transferred back to their home countries. (These transfers are carried out as secretly and as quietly as possible.) There have been no apologies, no official statements of regret, no compensation, nothing of the sort. The US was dead wrong, but no one can admit it.
In Nabil's case, the US military and intelligence agents relied on corrupt informants who were raking in American cash, or even worse, jailhouse snitches who swapped false stories for candy bars, porn and sometimes just a break from their own beatings.
The Obama administration has announced it is transferring some more Arab prisoners back to Algeria. It is likely that Nabil will be one of them, and if that happens another tragic mistake will be made. His nightmare will only continue. He will be homeless. He will have no support to reintegrate him into a society where many will be hostile to a former Gitmo detainee, either on the assumption that he is an extremist or because he refuses to join the extremist opposition to the Algerian government. Instead of showing some guts and admitting they were wrong, the US authorities will whisk him away, dump him on the streets of Algiers and wash their hands.
What should they do? Or what should we do?
First, admit the mistake and make the apology. Second, provide compensation. US taxpayers have spent $2m a year for 11 years to keep Nabil at Gitmo; give the guy a few thousand bucks to get on his feet. Third, pressure the French to allow his re-entry.
This sounds simple, but it will never happen.

02 May 2013

Practical Progress: Jailed for Praying, Starving for Justice 2MAI13

PRACTICAL PROGRESS e mail newsletter from the Agenda Project covering campaign finance reform, the hunger strike at Gitmo, closing Gitmo, gop / tea-bagger obstructionism of judicial nominees in the Senate, voter suppression laws, gun control, women in politics and financial reform and regulation of the bank-financial cabal....

PRACTICAL PROGRESS: The Agenda Project Action Fund's actually 'brief' briefing on the most Important News from the Progressive Movement.
SCARLET LETTER – On Monday, Americans for Financial Reform, Campaign Legal Center, CREW, Common Cause, Democracy 21, League of Women Voters, and Public Citizen sent the President a powerful letter, calling on him to step up and reform the "scandalous campaign finance system," including the "dysfunctional" FEC. The letter urges the President to exercise his executive authority to nominate individuals who are committed to properly enforcing the laws to the FEC and other agencies dealing with campaign activities.
STARVING FOR JUSTICE – Reacting to a mass hunger strike led by 100+ starving detainees, the President renewed his promise on Tuesday to shut down Guantánamo Bay’s prison - a promise he has failed to keep due to legislative flack piling up from his first term. ACLU Executive Director Anthony Romero has advised: “There are two things the president should do. One is to appoint a senior point person so that the administration's Guantánamo closure policy is directed by the White House and not by Pentagon bureaucrats. The president can also order the secretary of defense to start certifying for transfer detainees who have been cleared, which is more than half the Guantánamo population"(ACLU cited by NYT ed-board).
Human Rights First's Daphne Eviatar: “It’s disappointing that it has taken the president so long to finally acknowledge the crisis that’s been going on at Gitmo and that reflects the increasing desperation of the detainees there. But it’s wonderful that he’s finally talking about it, reaffirming that the prison needs to be shut down, and promising to do everything in his power to make that happen.  Now we just have to hold him to those promises.”
FACTS: Gitmo has 166 detained prisoners. 86 prisoners have been approved by the administration to return home. So far, none of them have returned home. (HRF
READ: Gitmo is Killing Me by detained prisoner Samir Naji al Hasan Moqbel (NYT) & Obama can close Guantanamo by Human Rights First's Daphne Eviatar (Reuters)

HUFFPO EXPOSÉ  Why Are Senate Republicans Blocking Judicial Nominations? "It's Disingenious..." Jen Bendery Finds Process "Gummed Up" UsingAlliance for Justice's Data.
JAILED FOR PRAYING -- North Carolina NAACP President Rev. Dr. William Barber was handcuffed and led to jail with 16 civil rights leaders, ministers, and students on Monday night for singing and praying in the state capital in protest of recent Republican legislation. The state has rejected funding to expand Medicaid to half a million North Carolinians without health insurance, cut the payroll tax credit for 900,000 poor and working people, and is on the brink of passing a package of extreme voter suppression laws. These voting laws include a $2,500 tax penalty on parents of college students to be levied if students vote in a precinct that is not in their home residence and a strict photo-ID law at the polls, which cleared in the state House last week.
"They are pursuing a cruel, unusual and unconstitutional agenda reminiscent of the Old South policy agenda of the white Southern strategy," said Rev. Barber. The protestors were charged with second degree trespassing for singing and praying too much in the state capital, failure to disperse, and carrying placards in the General Assembly. See video footage; click here and here for pictures.
The prayer protest was organized and led by NC NAACP, and supported by a coalition of state groups and national organizations like Advancement Project.                               
READ: Advancement Project's one-pager on states trying to pass voter-suppression laws in 2013.
ECONOMIC FOOTNOTES – A new fact-sheet from Citizens For Tax Justice shows the President's proposal to cap itemized deductions for the wealthy at 28 cents to the dollar would lead to tax increases next year for only 3.6% of Americans at roughly less than 1% of their incomes (or $5,950). Percentage of Americans whose taxes would increase under this proposal state-by-state: DC 8.9%, NY 5.1%, CA 5.1%, MA 5.7%, TX 3.6%.
TAKING ON THE NRA NEVER LOOKED THIS GOOD – Have You Seen The Gun Show Gallery?
MADAM PRESIDENT – EMILY's List, the 2M member PAC dedicated to electing pro-choice Democratic women candidates, will mobilize its energy and resources in battleground states to build a new voter base committed to electing the first female President in 2016. EMILY’s List announced today it will begin targeting efforts in IA, NV, and NH. A new poll commissioned by EMILY’s List found that 72% of battleground voters believe a woman will win the next presidential election. Watch: Madam President.
ON OUR AGENDA...
MEGA-BANKS, MEGA-DEAL – Today, former Chief Economist of the IMF and Top Wonk Simon Johnson slays the Davis Polk critique of Brown-Vitter. On substance, David Polk is "completely wrong."
Simon Johnson Tells Us Why Brown-Vitter Matters: "Brown-Vitter has changed the terms of the debate on financial reform. We are finally discussing the importance of much higher levels of equity financing for banks. Naturally, bank executives like the current arrangement - in which they get the upside when things go well and the downside is someone else's problem (i.e., yours). They are generating high levels of systemic risk pollution because they are allowed to operate with such high debt levels. The Federal Reserve must act to rein in this irresponsible excess. Brown-Vitter pushed the Fed in exactly the right direction - and with perfect timing."
 The Progressive Movement celebrates the President's recent decision to dump acting Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Ed DeMarco and nominate Rep. Melvin Watt (D-NC) as his official replacement. 
...Do You Like Our Newsletter? Subscribe.
Email tips, news, and reactions to Practical Progress Editor, Shruti Sehgal at ssehgal@agendaproject.org.
To Find Out More Go To....www.practicalprogress.org.

07 February 2013

On Civil Liberties, A Tale Of Two Obamas 6FEB13

WE THE PEOPLE find our civil liberties threatened and under attack by this administration with an intensity and duplicity that we haven't see in decades. President Obama has not only been hypocritical, he has also been deceptive and manipulative and misleading concerning the US Constitution, constitutional law, civil liberties,  gitmo, the abuses of the patriot act, the ndaa, extraordinary rendition, war and drones. He hasn't made an attempt to right the wrongs of past administrations, but has broken his campaign promises and left in place and actually expanded and strengthened the abuses of power and violations of our civil liberties. From BuzzFeed.....

Image by Getty Images

A Justice Department memo that surfaced this week providing legal justification for the Obama administration's use of drone strikes against American citizens suspected of plotting terrorist attacks stands in stark contrast with the platform Barack Obama ran on in 2008 — and the civil liberties he championed as a young, liberal state senator in Illinois.
The memo, which was first reported by NBC News, argues that the U.S. government can legally use drone strikes to kill American citizens without due process if they are determined to be high-ranking al-Qaeda officials who show "an imminent threat of violent attack against the United States."
"I can just say that this president takes his responsibilities very seriously, and first and foremost, that's his responsibility, to protect the United States and American citizens," White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said Tuesday, defending the drone policy. "These strikes are legal, they are ethical, and they are wise. The U.S. government takes great care in deciding to pursue an al-Qaeda terrorist, to ensure precision and to avoid loss of innocent life."
But for a politician who made his name in the state Senate by fiercely advocating reforms to the justice system — including mandatory recordings of all police interrogations and confessions in capital murder cases — and later decried the Patriot Act as an assault to civil liberties, Obama's defense of such drone attacks represents a remarkable departure from principles he championed not long ago.
As early as 2002, Obama was publicly carving out a decidedly progressive stance on these issues, using a Chicago television appearance to defend the civil liberties of American terror suspects who were being detained indefinitely without charges.
"There always has been a distinction between citizens and non-citizens," he said. "It means something to be a citizen. And that's important."
"I'm always more concerned about encroachment on civil rights or civil liberties that apply selectively to people. When they apply to everybody, there tends to be a majoritarian check," Obama added.
By comparison, in a Tuesday briefing, Carney said, "U.S. citizenship alone does not make a leader of an enemy force immune from being targeted."
Similarly, when George W. Bush signed the controversial Military Commissions Act of 2006, he did so at a desk with a sign on the front displaying the words "Protecting America." Obama was a vocal opponent of the law, which was criticized for its broad definition of an enemy combatant, its justification of torture, and its apparent encroachment on habeas corpus rights.
"I'm still disappointed, and I'm still ashamed," Obama said in a Senate floor speech in September 2006, criticizing the bill. "Because what we're doing here today, a debate over the fundamental human rights of the accused, should be bigger than politics. This is serious."
"But we also know that some have been detained who have no connection to terror whatsoever," Obama said. He added, "As one U.S. commander of Guantanamo told the Wall Street Journal, 'Sometimes, we just didn't get the right folks.' And we all know about the recent case of the Canadian man who was suspected of terrorist connections, detained in New York, sent to Syria, and tortured, only to find out later that it was all a case of mistaken identity and poor information."
"In the future, people like this may never have a chance to prove their innocence," then-Senator Obama said.
Less than seven years later, Obama's own press secretary would use those same words, "protecting America," to defend a drone policy that faces many of the same criticisms as Bush's law did.
When Obama ran for president in 2008, he built much of his messaging around rolling back what he considered Bush's assault on civil liberties. He pledged to shut down the U.S. detention center at Guantanamo Bay and slammed Bush by declaring, "I was a Constitutional law professor, which means, unlike the current president, I actually respect the Constitution."
He continued the same tack throughout Democratic primaries and the general election.
In a 2007 questionnaire given to the presidential candidates by the Boston Globe, Obama responded to a question about when it's OK to bomb a sovereign nation by saying, "The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation."
"I also reject the view, suggested in memoranda by the Department of Justice, that the President may do whatever he deems necessary to protect national security," Obama said in that same Globe questionnaire.
But in 2011, White House Homeland Security Advisor and the Obama administration's nominee for director of the Central Intelligence Agency defined "imminent threat" in broad terms that would likely contradict the view of then-Senator Obama.
"Over time, an increasing number of our international counterterrorism partners have begun to recognize that the traditional conception of what constitutes an "imminent" attack should be broadened in light of the modern-day capabilities, techniques, and technological innovations of terrorist organizations," Brennan said in a speech at Harvard Law School.
And when Carney was asked about the legality of the drone program this week, he cited the president's responsibility "to protect the United States and American citizens."

17 January 2013

BLUEPRINTS FOR THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION IN 2013 from HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST 17JAN13

PRES Obama's first term was not a shining light for civil liberties and human rights in the US or in our foreign and military policy around the world. The government has tolerated  major, continual, brutal human rights abuses in Bahrain and the prc while condemning the same violations of human rights in Cuba and Iran. And the administration has continued and even expanded the policies carried over from the bush administration that threaten the civil liberties and human rights of Americans at home and abroad, mainly warrantless wiretaps, government surveillance and extraordinary rendition.  Here are the policies Human Rights First will concentrate on in regards to the Obama administration in 2013....
These blueprints for the next administration outline practical steps lawmakers and administration officials can take to address some of the most pressing human rights in the world today.

How To Close Guantanamo »

The national security imperative to close Guantanamo remains as compelling today. President Obama should recommit to closing Guantanamo in his second term.

How to Promote International Religious Freedom »

The Obama Administration should develop a preventative strategy for combating religious extremism and promoting religious freedom that is commensurate with the challenges in today’s global landscape.

How to Disrupt Enablers of Mass Atrocities»

Genocide and mass atrocities are threats to U.S. national security interests. Here are concrete steps that the Obama Administration should take to disrupt the supply chain that supports such crimes.

How to Encourage U.S. Companies to Respect Human Rights»

When U.S. companies abuse or facilitate violations of human rights abroad, they undermine U.S. national interests in advancing security, economic development, and human rights. Here are concrete steps on how the U.S. government can encourage U.S. companies to promote human rights.

How to Ensure that the U.S. Drone Program Does Not Undermine Human Rights»

To ensure that the U.S. targeted killing/drone program is not undermining human rights, the Obama Administration should prioritize transparency, legality, and oversight.

How to Integrate Human Rights into U.S.-China Relations»

The Obama Administration should prioritize human rights promotion in China and maximize the potential for progress by developing a comprehensive, integrated approach built on a strategy that advances human rights through other issues on the U.S.-China agenda.

How to Make Change in Egypt a Human Rights Success Story»

To make Egypt’s transition a human rights success story, the United States must visibly and intentionally promote rule of law, pluralistic democracy, and civil society at the center of the bilateral relationship.

How to Protect and Expand Internet Freedom»

The vision of “one Internet” requires a coordinated policy objective across all departments of the U.S. government and throughout the Information and Communications Technology (ICT) sector.

How to Protect LGBTI Persons around the World from Violence»

In 2011, President Obama created a clear policy framework for combating serious rights violations against LGBTI persons. Here are recommendations for the administration, for operationalizing and institutionalizing the provisions of the memorandum.

How to Repair the U.S. Asylum and Refugee Resettlement Systems»

The Obama Administration should reaffirm U.S. leadership on the protection of refugees by repairing flaws in the U.S. asylum and resettlement systems.

How to Repair the U.S. Immigration Detention System»

The Obama Administration should prioritize the transformation of detention policies and practices in its immigration reform agenda and should lead this effort from the White House.

How to Support and Engage Human Rights Defenders»

As more countries crack down on nongovernmental organizations, the administration should dedicate itself to a stronger and more consistent approach to supporting civil society and human rights defenders. 

09 November 2012

PRES OBAMA, DON'T BLOW IT ON HUMAN RIGHTS 9NOV12

PRESIDENT OBAMA has the mandate to live up to his campaign promise to make human rights a priority in his administration. He must close Gitmo, end indefinite detention, end unlawful killings with drones, guarantee a comprehensive arms trade treaty and make sure the policy of the American government is to honor and uphold the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Click the link to join Amnesty International's call to action and send a message to Pres Obama.....

Amnesty International


"Don't blow it." That's what I want to say to President Obama.

This is the moment that will define the future of the United States' commitment on human rights. President Obama's second term will determine whether the post 9/11 stains on the United States' human rights record are an anomaly or the "new normal."

President Obama promised to support and advance human rights. Let's hold him to it.

When he was first elected in 2008, President Obama promised a new dawn of American leadership. As a new president, he acknowledged that the protection of human rights cannot rest on exhortation alone.

He offered the promise of an administration that would respect human rights -- closing the Guantánamo prison, bringing detention practices in line with international law, repudiating secrecy and ensuring that human rights weren't traded away in the name of national security.

It really isn't a choice for the President to make. Under international law, the U.S. government is obligated to respect, protect and fulfill human rights, and ensure accountability for violations of those rights.

Tell President Obama to live up to his promises and uphold human rights.

The prison at Guantánamo, indefinite detention, unfair trials, unlawful killings with drones and other human rights violations committed by the U.S government undermine the rule of law in the U.S. and around the world. These abuses also create a climate in which other countries can point to a double-standard to justify their own human rights abuses with the refrain, 'if the U.S. government does that, why shouldn't we?'

By taking bold steps to restore respect for human rights President Obama can help ensure justice, security and accountability here in the U.S. and around the world. That's why he must take three bold actions immediately:

  • Close the prison at Guantánamo
  • Stop unlawful killing with drones
  • Ensure the UN adopts a strong Arms Trade Treaty
President Obama has been given a second chance to keep his promises on human rights. Please stand with us today and call on the president to live up to those promises.

Thank you for everything you do to protect and advance human rights.

Sincerely,
Suzanne Nossel
Executive Director
Amnesty International USA