NORTON META TAG

Showing posts with label patriot act. Show all posts
Showing posts with label patriot act. Show all posts

11 January 2014

Your privacy, your phone company and the NSA & The first phone company to publish a transparency report isn’t AT&T or Verizon 11&9JAN14

THIS is what makes me proud to be a member of Credo Mobile and Credo Action, have been for the past 10 years.....


CREDO Action
The first phone company to publish a transparency report isn't AT&T or Verizon.
Dear Craig,
The first phone company to publish a transparency report isn't AT&T or Verizon
This week CREDO made headlines by becoming the first telecom carrier to publicly report government requests for private information about our subscribers.
We issued this first-ever telecom transparency report in the wake of Edward Snowden's revelations about the NSA's dragnet that collects information about the phone calls, emails and other communications of virtually all Americans.
The headline in the Washington Post read: "The first phone company to publish a transparency report isn't AT&T or Verizon." It's your phone company, CREDO.
Read the first-ever telecom transparency report by clicking here.
This is a very big deal. In addition to the Washington Post article, the influential tech site Mashable wrote a piece from the industry perspective: "Small Carrier 'CREDO Mobile' Publishes Industry's First Transparency Report". And Wired offered a longer piece with an historical perspective titled "Telecom Believed to Be at Center of Gov Court Fight Files Surveillance Transparency Report".
We're proud of our long history defending civil liberties and fighting against abuses of power that threaten our constitutional rights to privacy, not just for our phone customers like you, but for all Americans. Despite the shocking revelations of NSA abuses, the U.S. government continues to defend unconstitutional programs to systematically spy on Americans. So it's up to companies like ours to lift the curtain to the extent allowed by law and fight for our constitutional rights.
CREDO opposes overreaching government surveillance of American citizens, and has fought for full repeal of the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 and the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, and to that end is working to pass Rep. Rush Holt's Surveillance State Repeal Act. During the Bush Administration, CREDO fought against the unprecedented federal wiretapping of American citizens without any court order and the cover-up that followed, including advocating for an end to the retroactive immunity granted to protect telecom companies from facing charges for colluding with the NSA in the illegal wiretapping of Americans.
True reform of our surveillance state will require action by Congress or the courts. Until full repeal of these laws is successful, CREDO is endorsing the USA Freedom Act to halt the dragnet indiscriminately sweeping up the phone records of Americans under Section 215 of the PATRIOT Act and to provide much-needed transparency for National Security Letters and other warrantless spying on our citizens. It's also important to note that we oppose Sen. Feinstein's recent intelligence bill (the so-called "FISA Improvements Act") which, under the guise of reform, does nothing to prevent the rampant 4th and 1st Amendment abuses that have become routine practices of a rogue NSA and other intelligence agencies, and in fact would codify the bulk collection practices of the NSA that so many Americans oppose.
CREDO has given nearly $2,000,000 to civil liberties groups including the American Civil Liberties Union, Center for Constitutional Rights, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Bill of Rights Defense Committee, Demand Progress, and American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression. We want you to know that with support from your phone and credit card bills, you are not only part of a company and an activism organization fighting overreach of the NSA and our surveillance state -- you're also providing much needed resources to groups who are pursuing an aggressive strategy in the courts to have these laws declared unconstitutional in the face of inaction by the White House and Congress.
We are proud to have an aggressive legislative agenda backed up by the activism of CREDO Action, with its nearly 3.5 million members. In the last year alone, our activists have made over 5,800 phone calls, sent 10,967 individual letters in the mail, and submitted more than 1,100,000 petition signatures and public comments protesting abuses of our 4th and 1st Amendment rights by the NSA, FISA courts, and federal law enforcement authorities. And now, as a telecom carrier, our transparency report represents a small and achievable step forward towards improved civil liberties protections and NSA reforms advocated by CREDO.
You can take action now to fight for our civil liberties with the following actions:
While we're proud of how high our transparency report raises the bar for other telecoms like AT&T and Verizon in terms of frequency of reporting and detail of information provided about government requests, it's important to note that due to existing U.S. surveillance statutes that CREDO is on the record opposing, such as the USA PATRIOT Act and the FISA Amendments Act, our report and those of other service providers may fall short of full transparency. Under such statutes, gags may be imposed on telecom companies that prohibit any discussion of certain types of requests for customer information, such as National Security Letters (NSLs) and orders under Section 215 of the PATRIOT Act, as well as whether such hypothetical orders have been complied with or whether they have been challenged in court.
Thank you for being part of CREDO -- as a customer we couldn't do this work without you.
If you'd like to share this update with your friends on Facebook, click here.
To share on Twitter, click here.
To share a link, cut and paste this URL: http://act.credoaction.com/signup/customer_transparency/?source=email_link
Sincerely,
Michael Kieschnick, CEO

CREDO TRANSPARENCY REPORT - 2013

CREDO has a long history of defending civil liberties and fighting against abuses of power that threaten Americans’ constitutional rights to privacy. We are working for full repeal of the USA PATRIOT Act and FISA Amendments Act. Until such time as full repeal can be achieved, as well as afterward, we strongly believe there should be as much transparency as possible regarding government surveillance, and that our customers have the right to know when governmental entities request access to their information or communications. Accordingly, we are today publishing a transparency report detailing the number of governmental requests for customer information1 and the content of customer communications we received in 2013 that are not subject to a legal order not to disclose, and publish similar reports on a quarterly basis going forward.
It is our policy to notify our customers, whenever allowed by law, of the existence of a governmental request for their information. It is important to note that it may not be possible for CREDO or any telecom carrier to release to the public a full transparency report, as the USA PATRIOT Act and other statutes give law enforcement the ability to prevent companies from disclosing whether or not they have received certain orders, such as National Security Letters (NSLs) and Section 215 orders seeking customer information. CREDO has and continues to publicly advocate for the repeal of laws such as these that infringe upon our customers’ constitutional right to due process.

NUMBER OF REQUESTS TO CREDO

Number of governmental requests for customer information pursuant to subpoena, summons, court order, or other process: 15
Number of emergency governmental requests for customer information2: 1
Number of governmental requests for which some or all information requested was produced3: 14 (88%)
Number of governmental requests for which customer communication content information requested (including wiretap requests) was produced: 0
Number of customer accounts for which customer information was produced: 15
Note: Our report does not include information requests consented to by the customer (e.g., to trace a lost or stolen phone) or civil requests.

ORIGIN, LOCATION, AND TYPE OF REQUEST

CREDO provides US-based telecom services.
Type of Request Requesting Agency Was some or all of requested customer information provided? Customer State
Administrative Subpoena DOJ/DEA Yes IL
Administrative Subpoena County District Attorney Yes MA
Administrative Subpoena DOJ/DEA Yes CA
Emergency Request City Police Department Yes NY
Summons to Produce Records Homeland Security/Police Department Yes CA
Subpoena Duces Tecum Construction Contractors Board Yes OR
Prosecuting Attorney's Subpoena County Attorney/City Police Dept. Yes IA
Grand Jury Subpoena DOJ Yes MA
Administrative Subpoena Police Department Yes NV
Summons to Produce Records State's Attorney No MD
Subpoena County Circuit Court Yes AL
Subpoena Duces Tecum County Sheriff's Office Yes FL
Subpoena DOJ/DEA Yes FL
Subpoena DOJ/FBI No CA
Subpoena DOJ/FBI Yes CA
Administrative Subpoena DOJ/DEA Yes NY

CREDO ADVOCACY AND FUNDING

CREDO supports the repeal the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 and the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, and the passage of Rep. Rush Holt’s Surveillance State Repeal Act. Until full repeal can be achieved, CREDO has worked specifically to reform the worst abuses of both acts. This includes fighting to roll back the National Security Letter (NSL) provisions of the USA PATRIOT Act, and fighting to make FISA Court opinions public so that the American people know how the secret FISA court is interpreting the law. CREDO endorses the USA Freedom Act and the Amash Amendment, both aimed at halting the indiscriminate dragnet sweeping up the phone records of Americans. CREDO also opposes Senator Feinstein’s FISA Improvements Act which would codify the NSA’s unconstitutional program of surveillance by bulk collection.
In addition to our civil rights activism, we also are a committed funder of civil liberties groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union, Center for Constitutional Rights, Electronic Frontier Foundation, and American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression.
Transparency Report Release Date: January 8, 2014
1 Customer information refers to non-content information such a customer’s name, address, bill information, or handset or account information. Regarding the content of customer communications, CREDO does not receive or store the content of customer communications. This report includes only CREDO’s requests and does not include requests that may have been directed to another carrier.
2 CREDO evaluates emergency requests to ensure they satisfy the requirements of 18 USC § 2702(c)(4) and/or (b)(8).
3 Includes requests for which CREDO had no responsive information.
http://www.credomobile.com/misc/transparency.aspx


The first phone company to publish a transparency report isn’t AT&T or Verizon

(philcampbell / Flickr)
(philcampbell / Flickr)
Ever since we learned that the country's phone companies were handing vast amounts of data to the government under court order, pressure has been mounting for them to publish a Silicon Valley-type transparency report detailing how exactly they're complying.
Now the first such report is out. But instead of coming from industry mainstays such as Verizon or AT&T, the disclosure comes from a little-known, left-leaning service known as CREDO Mobile.
For the unfamiliar, San Francisco-based CREDO is a progressive organization that supports causes like marriage equality and environmental activism. Its wireless service arm is a small part of that, with around 125,000 subscribers. But the operation helps subsidize the broader organization's political activity, and it's probably safe to say that CREDO Mobile customers are generally in it for ideological reasons.
Still, CREDO Mobile operates just like any other phone service. It partners with Sprint and piggybacks off of its network to provide cellular service to its users. And that means it's subject to the same data requests that its larger cousins routinely face.
According to CREDO Mobile's transparency report, federal, state and local authorities summoned user data from the company 16 times in 2013. That isn't a lot. It makes sense.
One of those cases involved a potentially life-threatening emergency. In 14 cases, CREDO Mobile gave up at least some information in response to the requests, which affect 15 individual user accounts. (This last figure is important, because the impact of an aggregate number of requests is hard to judge without knowing how many real people they cover.)
CREDO also does something very unusual: It breaks down each request not only by type, but also according to the agency that made the request and the state in which the target subscriber lives. The report also discloses whether specific data requests yielded any information.
It probably wasn't too difficult for CREDO to pull together this extra data, given its small size. But it's an enlightening move, and one that other companies would do well to consider adopting in their own disclosures.
Other phone companies — including the nation's four biggest wireless carriers — have spoken about their compliance with government data requests before. But they did so in the context of a congressional probe by Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.). Since then, AT&T and Verizon have vowed to publish a periodic transparency report but have not yet done so.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2014/01/09/the-first-phone-company-to-publish-a-transparency-report-isnt-att-or-verizon/

24 October 2013

A Rally Against Mass Surveillance 12pm This Saturday, 10/26, in front of Union Station, Washington, D.C.

HERE's more information on the Rally Against Mass Surveillance this Saturday, 26 OKT 13. I will be there, because I still have the right to speak out against my government spying on me and my fellow Americans! Our Democracy, the Republic we love, our civil liberties are at risk and we must act to end the government's mass surveillance program NOW!!!!!
http://youtu.be/aGmiw_rrNxk 
Published on Oct 23, 2013
StopWatching.us is a coalition of more than 100 public advocacy organizations and companies from across the political spectrum. Join the movement at https://rally.stopwatching.us. This video harnesses the voices of celebrities, activists, legal experts, and other prominent figures in speaking out against mass surveillance by the NSA. Please share widely to help us spread the message that we will not stand for the dragnet surveillance of our communications.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is a nonprofit civil liberties law and advocacy center that has been fighting the NSA's unconstitutional spying for years. Learn more at https://eff.org.
Rally Against Mass Surveillance

When: Saturday, Oct. 26, 11:30am-3pm
Where: Start at Union Station in Columbus Circle, march to Capitol Reflecting Pool
Details: Marchers will gather at Union Station at 11:30 a.m. in Columbus Circle. At noon we’ll march to Union Square (on 3rd Street and Madison Dr. NW in front of the Capitol Reflecting Pool) where the rally will take place.

As always, we need your help spreading the word. Be sure to RSVP for the event on Facebook (and invite your contacts), download posters, hit up Twitter, email your contacts or call your friends.

See you Saturday,

Josh, Ben, Charlie, Mary Alice, Katherine and the rest of the StopWatching.Us coalition.

The NSA is spying on everyone's personal communications. It’s operating without any meaningful oversight.
On October 26th, the 12th anniversary of the signing of the USA Patriot Act, we're holding the largest rally yet against NSA surveillance. We’ll be handing more than a half-million petitions to Congress to remind them that they work for us — and we won’t tolerate mass surveillance any longer.
A stellar group of whistleblowers, activists, researchers and others from both sides of the political spectrum will be speaking at this historic event. The list includes:
  • Congressman Justin Amash
  • Former senior NSA executive and whistleblower Thomas Drake
  • Social critic Naomi Wolf
  • Jona Bechtolt, from electro-punk band YACHT
  • Claire L. Evans, also from YACHT
  • Lt. Dan Choi, LGBT advocate and U.S. veteran
  • Rainey Reitman, EFF
  • Bruce Schneier, internationally renowned security technologist
  • Craig Aaron, Free Press
  • Kymone Freeman, Director of the National Black LUV Fest
  • Former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson
  • Khalilah Barnes, EPIC
  • Shahid Buttar, Bill of Rights Defense Committee
  • Malachi Byrd, DC Youth Poetry Slam Team
  • Wafa Ben Hassine, writer and human rights advocate
  • Former Congressman Dennis Kucinich
  • Laura Murphy, ACLU
  • NOT4PROPHET, Hip Hop MC and community organizer
  • Black Alley, DC-based soul-garage band
Location:
Marchers will gather in front of Union Station at 11:30 a.m. by the Christopher Columbus Memorial Fountain in Columbus Circle. Shortly after noon we’ll march to the National Mall at 3rd Street and Madison Dr. NW, in front of the Capitol Reflecting Pool, where there will be a stage set up for our rally speakers, musicians, and performers.
Read more and see a map.

Who we are

StopWatching.us is a coalition of more than 100 public advocacy organizations and companies from across the political spectrum. We came together in June 2013 to demand the U.S. Congress investigate the full extent of the NSA's spying programs. Go here to read our letter to U.S. Congress demanding accountability and reform.
Members of the StopWatching.us coalition include:

PUBLIC ADVOCACY ORGANIZATIONS:

INDIVIDUALS:

Tim Berners-Lee
Inventor of the World Wide Web
Daniel Ellsberg
Whistleblower of the Pentagon Papers, Author
Gabriella Coleman
Author and academic
Glenn Greenwald
Journalist and lawyer
Ai Weiwei
Chinese artist and activist
Xeni Jardin
Journalist and founding partner of Boing Boing
Eli Pariser
Founder, Upworthy
Wil Wheaton
Actor
Alexis Ohanian
Founder, Reddit
Ben Cohen
Campaign donor
Anil Dash
Entrepreneur, technologist and writer

COMPANIES:

NEWS

Announcing The Stop Watching Us Video

23 Oct 2013 Read more ...

Project Megaphone: Fight Surveillance With 9 Lines of Code

17 Oct 2013 If you own a website, you can help us put a stop to warrantless surveillance.
Read more ...

Get on a bus, or find a rideshare

11 Oct 2013 On Oct. 26, thousands of people — including you — will descend on Washington, D.C., to tell Congress to stop the NSA’s unconstitutional mass surveillance.
Read more ...

Announcing the Rally Against Mass Surveillance

18 Sep 2013 The recent NSA revelations have laid it all out: The NSA is watching us online and on our phones. The NSA has corrupted security and cryptography, undermining the fabric of the Internet. Its overreaching surveillance is creating a climate of fear, chills free speech, and violates our basic human rights — and it operates without any meaningful oversight.
Read more ...
https://rally.stopwatching.us/

02 August 2013

Sen. Obama warned about Patriot Act abuses. President Obama proved him right. 2AUG13

WHAT a wasted opportunity to be one of our great presidents. And NO, it is no consolation knowing mitt romney would have been worse. At least we knew that, Obama flat out lied to and deceived us.....
President Barack Obama gestures as he speaks to reporters in the White House… (Carolyn Kaster/AP )
President Obama gestures as he speaks to reporters in the White House… (Carolyn Kaster/AP )
In recent months, Barack Obama has forcefully defended the use of the Patriot Act to gather the phone records of every American. But before he was elected president, he had a very different perspective on the issue.
In December 2005, Congress was debating the first re-authorization of the Patriot Act, a controversial 2001 law that gave the federal government expanded power to spy on Americans. And Barack Obama was one of nine senators who signed a letter criticizing the then-current version of the legislation for providing insufficient protections for civil liberties.
The senators focused on Section 215 of the Patriot Act, which allows the government to obtain “business records” that are “relevant” to a terrorism investigation. Sen. Obama and eight of his colleagues worried that the provision would “allow government fishing expeditions targeting innocent Americans. We believe the government should be required to convince a judge that the records they are seeking have some connection to a suspected terrorist or spy.”
Congress eventually re-authorized the Patriot Act, including Section 215. A few years later, Obama was elected president of the United States. And under President Obama’s watch, the NSA engaged in surveillance suspiciously similar to the broad “fishing expeditions” Sen. Obama warned about.
The government has argued that records of every phone call made in the United States are “relevant” to counter-terrorism investigations generally, allowing them to obtain information about the private phone calls of millions of Americans — exactly the kind of argument Sen. Obama warned the government would make if the language of Section 215 wasn’t tightened.
Sen. Obama and his colleagues also objected to the lack of transparency and due process in Section 215. “The target of a Section 215 order never receives notice that the government has obtained his sensitive personal information and never has an opportunity to challenge the use of this information in a trial or other proceeding,” they wrote.
Again, this prediction proved prescient. In 2012, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) asked the NSA for a “ballpark estimate” of the number of Americans who had been subject to NSA surveillance. The NSA refused, claiming that revealing the number would violate the targets’ privacy. We now know that the figure was in the hundreds of millions. And prior to NSA leaker Edward Snowden’s disclosures, none of them received notice of the surveillance or an opportunity to challenge it in court.
So what changed Obama’s mind? Obviously, being elected president makes people more comfortable with presidential power and less enthusiastic about limits on that power. It’s also possible that when Obama became president and began receiving intelligence briefings, he became more alarmed about terrorist threats and more willing to limit civil liberties to deal with them. In any event, it seems likely that if Obama were still in the Senate, he’d be joining Wyden in criticizing the NSA’s use of the Patriot Act to spy on millions of Americans.
Correction: This story originally stated, incorrectly, that Ron Wyden signed the 2005 letter. We regret the error

13 June 2013

Three Exchanges You Should Listen To About NSA Surveillance 12JUN13

THE fascist conspirators in the "intelligence" community, with Army Gen keith alexander as their primary propagandist at the Senate hearings, are doing their best to justify the government's violations of our civil liberties by manipulating people's fears of terrorism. The first  example below contains a reference to 11SEP01 and a big what if. What I want to know is if this is such a valuable tool how did the Boston Marathon bombing happen? We also need to know what part of the patriot act (itself an abomination of "law" and a clear violation of our civil liberties) allows the nsa to ignore the minimal requirements of the act and not be required to obtain a warrant from a fisa court. Gen alexander would not admit there is no legal justification for the nsa violating that law, bypassing even these minimal "protections" and got a pass to work out his spin on this issue. But thank God Sen Collins R ME put to rest one of our fears, getting alexander to state he knows of no way the nsa could wiretap the president. That assurance from the mouth of the person who doesn't feel these violations of law and civil liberties are wrong. Yeah, I believe him. This from NPR.....



U.S. Army Gen. Keith Alexander, commander of the U.S. Cyber Command, director of the National Security Agency (NSA), testifies during a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing on Capitol Hill, on Wednesday.
U.S. Army Gen. Keith Alexander, commander of the U.S. Cyber Command, director of the National Security Agency (NSA), testifies during a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing on Capitol Hill, on Wednesday.
Mark Wilson/Getty Images
Gen. Keith Alexander, the director of the National Security Agency, received a public grilling by members of the Senate Appropriations Committee on Wednesday.
We listened to the long hearing and pulled out three sections of audio that, while dry and sometimes boring, are important to understanding the story of the NSA obtaining vast amounts of data about the electronic activity of Americans. As we've reported, at the center of the controversy is a leaked secret court document authorizing the collection of all the calls made by Verizon customers during a three month period.
With that, here are the three pieces of audio you should listen to: (You need to click the link above to go to the NPR story to hear the questions and answers)
— An Explanation: Responding to Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Alexander explained why the collection of phone meta-data is important. Alexander framed it in the case of Sept. 11 hijacker Khalid al-Mihdhar. (Here's background from the Sept. 11 Commission report.) What if the NSA had had the ability to track all of his phone connections, even in the past? Perhaps the government could have tracked his conspirators. 
Alexander Responds To Durbin
— The Original Request: One of more substantive exchanges came between Alexander and Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), who zeroed in on the original request of data on all phone calls made by Verizon customers. Alexander said the government doesn't look at that data without further permission from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Court. Merkley said that doesn't matter. He wanted to know what in the USA Patriot Act justified the original data dump:
Alexander Responds To Merkley
— Broad Wiretapping: The one question that got an easy answer was one from Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), who asked if what NSA leaker Edward Snowden said about being able to wiretap anyone, even the president, was true. Alexander said he knew no way to do that.
Alexander Responds To Collins

08 June 2013

President Obama: Justify your indiscriminate spying on Americans 7JUN13

SO far, Pres Obama's second term has been a huge disappointment and a waste. I thought, and so volunteered a lot of time and donated more money than I should have to help get him reelected, believing he and his administration had had enough of the republican / tea-bagger obstructionism in Congress and would come out swinging and fight for the progressive Democratic platform he was reelected on. Not only has he totally embraced the fascist patriot act of the bush administration, he has expanded government spying in America. He and his administration, as well as like minded neo-cons in Congress and the media, defend the government's actions in the name of national security. Bull. If there was nothing wrong with what they have been doing and their plans to continue what they are doing they would not have taken the steps they did to keep their activities from the public. Government domestic spying is wrong, it is a violation of our civil liberties as established in the Bill of Rights in the American Constitution, and can not be justified in the name of national security. Ever since I found out the fbi has a file on me, started when I was in the 9th grade, I have doubted the government's intentions concerning national security. I love my country but I don't trust my government. My disappointment is that I have to maintain that attitude with Obama as president. From Credo....

 
CREDO action
Tell President Obama: Justify your indiscriminate spying on Americans‬
The petition reads:
"President Obama: We call upon you and demand that, as a constitutional scholar who ran on a platform of transparency in government, you justify your indiscriminate spying on Americans."


Pres Obama: Spying on Americans — click here to take action.
Recent news stories have revealed the breathtaking scope of President Obama’s indiscriminate spying on American citizens who aren’t suspected of any wrongdoing.‬
‪ ‬‪There is something fundamentally un-American and deeply undemocratic about this kind of government surveillance.‬ ‪
‪But since 9/11, we have seen first George W. Bush and now Barack Obama engage in shockingly broad executive power grabs that undermine our constitutionally protected civil liberties, all in the name of “national security.” ‬ ‪
‬ President Obama is a constitutional scholar who ran on the platform of transparency in government. We don’t believe he has the constitutional right to collect and examine the telephone records of virtually all Americans. But if he thinks that he has the authority to spy on Americans, he should acknowledge these programs and provide his legal rationale for them.‬
 ‪Demand President Obama acknowledge these spying programs and provide a full legal justification for indiscriminately spying on Americans. Click here to automatically sign the petition.
‪First it was revealed that the NSA, an arm of the U.S. military that is chartered to deal with foreign threats, was collecting information about the phone calls made or received by millions of Verizon customers in the U.S. And recent news reports now indicate that the program isn't limited to Verizon. ‬ ‪
‪Next we learned that, according to new reports, tech giants like Microsoft, Google and Apple have given the NSA direct access to their computer servers so the NSA can access, for example, the contents of e-mail inboxes without any kind of court order. ‬ ‪
‪If the Fourth Amendment prohibition of unreasonable search and seizure is to mean anything, not to mention our First Amendment right to free speech, we must take action and demand answers in the face of these recent revelations about government spying.‬ ‪
‬ ‪Demand President Obama acknowledge these spying programs and provide a full legal justification for indiscriminately spying on Americans. Click here to automatically sign the petition.
‬ ‪For far too long, “national security” has been both a way for the government to override civil liberties objections and a way to squelch debate. We had hoped that the worst abuses of the Patriot Act would be over at the end of the Bush era, but President Obama has continued and perhaps even doubled-down on President Bush’s policies. ‪
‬ ‪We recently saw the debate about the president’s targeted assassination program become much more robust once the president stopping hiding behind the veil of national security, acknowledged the existence of the program and provided his rationale for it.‬
‪ While we vehemently reject the legality of these extrajudicial assassinations, and struggle to imagine how the indiscriminate surveillance of countless Americans could possibly be legal or constitutional, the fact of the matter is that these issues hit at the heart of what rights we have as American citizens. ‬ ‪
‪We cannot have a real debate about the ostensible merits of these programs and the trade-offs the president’s administration may be making between our civil liberties and the legitimate national security needs -- or, for that matter, hold our elected officials accountable for their complicity in trampling the Constitution -- if all we know about government spying comes from leaked documents and anonymous sources. ‬
‪If President Obama believes that he has the authority to indiscriminately spy on Americans, he owes it to us to explain his legal justification for doing so.‬ 
We don't know what else might be revealed in the coming days. But we do know that the American people deserve an explanation for this massive Obama administration surveillance program to spy on our citizens -- the extent of which we don’t even know yet.
‪Tell the president we want answers. Click the link below to automatically sign the petition:
http://act.credoaction.com/go/835?t=6&akid=8109.179403.zs40eS
Matt Lockshin, Campaign Manager
CREDO Action from Working Assets
Learn more about this campaign
Further reading:
1. "Government Is Tracking Verizon Customers' RecordsWall Street Journal, June 6, 2013.
2. "Documents: U.S. mining data from 9 leading Internet firms; companies deny knowledge," Washington Post, June 6, 2013.
3. "NSA collecting phone records of millions of Verizon customers daily," Guardian [UK], June 6, 2013.