NORTON META TAG

Showing posts with label 1st Amendment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1st Amendment. Show all posts

28 August 2026

Fired 'Stars and Stripes' Journalists Sue Pentagon, Seeking to Block Their Terminations 27AUG26

Lt. Col. Sean P. Klimek, commander Stars and Stripes Europe and Expeditionary, Office of Secretary of Defense, Kaiserslautern, Germany, Max D. Lederer, jr., Publisher Stars and Stripes and Lt. Col. Richard E. McClintic, Commander of Stars and Stripes Pacific headquarters in Tokyo, Japan, pose for a group photo with Public Affairs personnel from U.S. Army Central

 NOT fired for publishing actual military secrets that would put American military members and the nation at risk, no, these people were fired for doing their job and reporting truth and facts much to the chagrin of neo-nazi fascist fotze trunt petie lola hegseth and that no class neo-nazi fascist drippings ( meaning the best of him, it there actually was any, ran down something's leg ) c-i-c bone spurs NOT MY pres drumpf/trump. It is a very sad commentary on the lack of commitment to defending the US Constitution, especially the First Amendment by the drumpf/trump-vance administration, their ass licking cabinet and the gop / greed over people-republican party. This from Military.com.....

Fired 'Stars and Stripes' Journalists Sue Pentagon, Seeking to Block Their Terminations


"Our goal is to protect the rights of service members and their families to a free and independent press," the plaintiffs said.

Published Aug 27, 2026, 6:23 PM EDT


Three Stars and Stripes journalists fired by the Pentagon last week have sued the Department of Defense, seeking to block their terminations.

Editor-in-Chief Erik Slavin, Middle East reporter Lara Korte, and publisher Max Lederer filed the 45-page lawsuit Thursday in Washington. Among the defendants named were the Defense Department, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and two of the department's public affairs officials, according to their now former employer.

The suit asks the court to halt the terminations as unlawful, arguing they amounted to retaliation over unflattering coverage of a Navy deployment as part of a broader attempt to censor the press. The three plaintiffs are represented by Democracy Defenders Fund, Lawyers for Good Government, Government Accountability Project and the Yale School Media Freedom and Information Access Clinic

"Our goal is to protect the rights of service members and their families to a free and independent press," the three journalists said in a joint statement provided to Military.com. "This lawsuit is about safeguarding that mission and ensuring our civilian and military journalists can do their jobs without retaliation."

Stars and Stripes Personnel Meet Journalist in Kuwait
Colonel Christopher M. Coglianese, facing left, deputy chief of staff, U.S. Army Central (Forward), meets with Max D. Lederer Jr., center, publisher, Stars and Stripes
Credit: U.S. Army Reserve photo by Staff Sgt. Justin Hardin

The three were issued separation notices last Friday, each charged with insubordination. Stars and Stripes is owned by the Defense Department and its employees are federal workers, but the paper operates as an editorially independent news organization. It has been in continuous circulation since World War II.

Military.com asked the Defense Department whether it intends to contest the lawsuit and about the status of the employees' appeals. No response was received by press time.

The Firings

Separation notices for Slavin and Korte cited a CBS News interview in which each defended the First Amendment principles behind their work and said censorship of news for service members would be a red line.

Slavin joined the publication in 2005 and became its top editor in September 2025. Korte began reporting for the paper in 2024.

Lederer, who spent 30 years with Stars and Stripes and had announced his retirement days before the firings, was terminated because he refused a request from Pentagon leadership to fire Slavin and Korte, according to the lawsuit.

USS_Abraham_Lincoln_Conducts_a_Replenishment-at-Sea
Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72) sails in the Arabian Sea, May 29, 2026
Credit: [null Courtesy], Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

He was also cited for insubordination over comments he made in his resignation.

Attorneys for Slavin and Korte claim they are being fired merely for saying on the CBS Sunday Morning TV show that Stars and Stripes should remain independent of Pentagon and political influence.

“The Pentagon is trying to punish journalists for defending the established mission of Stars and Stripes,” said Taryn Wilgus Null, senior counsel at Democracy Defenders Fund, in a statement provided to Military.com. “We are asking the court to stop these unconstitutional terminations. Service members and their families need reporting that is independent of the officials it covers and is unafraid to criticize them when they deserve it.”

Lederer had said he was stepping down because his understanding of the mission of Stars and Stripes differed in "fundamental ways" from the direction the Defense Department had set for the paper. He was scheduled to leave Sept. 30.

A Warning Over the USS Abraham Lincoln

The firings are tied directly to the newspaper's reporting, per the complaint.

The demand that Lederer fire Slavin and Korte came the day after Stars and Stripes published an article on deteriorating conditions aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln, according to the suit.

That news coverage described an aircraft carrier that had been deployed for a historic 270 days without a port call, as part of the ongoing war with Iran that will mark the six-month mark of the conflict on Friday.

“These retaliatory firings at Stars and Stripes are precisely why these First Amendment protections matter," Amy Powell, litigation director, Lawyers for Good Government, said in a statement shared with Military.com. "The government cannot preserve an independent press while punishing the people who insist that its independence is paramount to a functioning democracy.

"We are proud to stand with these employees in defending their rights and the principle that government officials cannot use their power over federal workers to silence protected speech.”​​​​​​​

The dispute over the paper's independence predates the firings. In March, the Pentagon outlined an overhaul of Stars and Stripes that barred it from using some newswire services and running comics and other syndicated features.

They required that its content be consistent with "good order and discipline," a phrase drawn from the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Its ombudsman, whose role Congress created to protect its editorial independence, was fired in April.

This week's lawsuit is separate from a suit filed in June by two members of the paper's advisory board, who alleged the Pentagon's overhaul violated federal law. That case remains pending.


21 August 2026

Trump Threatens Suit Over Report He Doesn’t Like, Aiming to Intimidate a Critic 21AUG26

 

Neera Tanden, the president and chief executive of the Center for American Progress, said that the center would “neither cower nor bend in the face” of legal action.Credit...Jason Andrew for The New York Times


NOT MY pres drumpf/trump is a fat diaper wearing pants shitting stinking neo-nazi fascist pig drippings. He is a corrupt repulsive selfish greedy authoritarian narcissistic psychotic sociopathic child raping sexual predator. He is a cowardly draft dodging genocidal war criminal also guilty of crimes against humanity. He is a misogynist bigot racist compulsive liar fear monger. Don't ever be cowed by him or his ass licking cabal minions so that you are afraid to remind America and  the world just what he really is, no class trash. As I have said before I do not wish any harm on him but I know we and the rest of the world will be better off when he is gone. This from the New York Times.....

Trump Threatens Suit Over Report He Doesn’t Like, Aiming to Intimidate a Critic


It was the latest example of President Trump’s bid to use the legal system against those who voice unflattering facts and opinions generally protected by the First Amendment.


President Trump has opened a new front in his campaign to intimidate political foes, threatening a prominent liberal think tank with a $5 billion defamation lawsuit over a report concluding that his deployment of the National Guard to cities across the country has had little effect on reducing violent crime.

The threats against the think tank, the Center for American Progress, were Mr. Trump’s latest effort to use the legal system to punish critics for voicing unflattering facts and opinions generally protected by the First Amendment. And while it is unclear how far any suit the president might ultimately file will get in court, it could force the organization to spend money fighting it off and make it even more of a target of his allies and supporters.

On Monday, one of Mr. Trump’s personal lawyers, Alejandro Brito, wrote a letter to the center warning that he would file the suit if the group did not fully retract the report, which was published on its website on July 13. The letter, viewed by The New York Times, was addressed to the group’s president and chief executive, Neera Tanden, a longtime Democratic official who served as a senior adviser to President Joseph R. Biden Jr., and to several of its board members.

Mr. Brito claimed that the report about the National Guard was full of malicious and false statements. He gave Ms. Tanden and members of her board until 5 p.m. on Friday to retract it and apologize to Mr. Trump.


Ms. Tanden pushed back, saying in a statement that the center would “neither cower nor bend in the face” of legal action. She also defended the report, asserting that while its findings might have been “inconvenient to the Trump administration,” they were “grounded in rigorous, evidence-based research and analysis.”

“This threatened lawsuit’s attack on facts and evidence is baseless,” she added. “A fundamental protection of the First Amendment is to allow for the publication of facts and analysis that is contrary to the arguments and claims of any administration. A lawsuit is a transparent attempt to silence us.”


Mr. Trump has often lashed out at scholars and commentators for reproaching or critiquing him in the news media. And since winning re-election, he has filed a flurry of lawsuits against news organizations like the BBC and The Times, claiming they defamed him. He has even filed suit against the Des Moines Register, arguing that a poll the paper published before the 2024 election indicating that he would lose the vote in Iowa amounted to consumer fraud and election interference.

(The Times has filed its own suits against the administration, including two seeking increased access for its reporters at the Pentagon.)


The president has repeatedly claimed that his administration is the most transparent in American history. But he and his aides have used lawsuits and executive actions to go after law firmsuniversities and television networks. They have also used criminal tactics such as search warrants and grand jury subpoenas in an effort to pry loose sensitive information from reporters.

Many of these efforts have faltered once they reached court and faced judicial scrutiny. Mr. Brito himself has filed multiple failed suits on behalf of Mr. Trump. Last month, a federal judge in Florida referred Mr. Brito for potential disciplinary proceedings after ruling that a suit he filed for the president against the Internal Revenue Service amounted to an improper exercise in self-dealing.

The Center for American Progress report accused Mr. Trump of seeking to take credit for a nationwide decline in violent crime that began before he returned to the White House. The report determined that there was “no evidence” that the National Guard deployments had affected the crime rate, adding that they were poised to cost taxpayers more than $1.7 billion if they continued through the end of 2026.

The report asserted that the “primary goal” of the deployments was “never to stop crime.” Instead, it said they amounted to “a dangerous power grab by the Trump administration.”

The team that put the report together used an analysis based on homicide, violent crime and gun victimization data in cities where the National Guard was deployed — Washington, Los Angeles and Memphis — over the period from January 2023 to this February.


“This approach was employed to identify any statistical changes in crime trends associated with the deployment of the National Guard in specific cities,” its authors wrote.

Mr. Trump referred to the report on social media last week after watching a television segment about the report, which he described as “another Radical Left SCAM.” In the post, he threatened to sue the center and several of its funders, including the liberal financier George Soros, who has long served as a boogeyman for the administration.

A week later, Mr. Brito’s letter arrived at the center, saying that the president would sue if Ms. Tanden and her colleagues did not retract the report, issue an apology and give Mr. Trump unspecified financial compensation.

The letter ended with an all-caps salutation: “PLEASE GOVERN YOURSELVES ACCORDINGLY.”

On Friday, a lawyer for the center fired back in a letter of his own, deriding Mr. Trump’s accusations that he had been defamed.

“This is utterly absurd,” the lawyer, Kevin H. Metz, wrote to Mr. Brito. “Truth is not and cannot be defamation.”

Mr. Metz went on to say that the center welcomed the opportunity to make its case in court and receive more information on the National Guard deployments through the process of discovery.

Other think tanks of various political stripes have rallied to the center’s side.

“Independent organizations across the ideological spectrum must be free to express their analysis and opinions, and to challenge those in power without fear of political retaliation or legal intimidation,” said Peter Goettler, the president and chief executive of the libertarian Cato Institute. “Disagreements on matters of policy should be settled through open inquiry, evidence, and debate — not threats designed to silence criticism.”


Alan Feuer is a reporter for The Times who covers the effects President Trump has had on the courts, the Justice Department and the broader rule of law.


The Latest on the Trump Administration