NORTON META TAG

Showing posts with label dept of defense. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dept of defense. Show all posts

08 March 2014

Judge sentences 84 year old Nun to 3 years for 2012 Oak Ridge Anti-Nuclear Weapons protest 18FEB14

WITH all the vicious, violent crimes committed by various politicians at the local, state and federal level and their corporate, wall street, bank-financial cabal and military-industrial complex masters, with all the corruption, bribery, graft, theft and fraud they have and continue to commit against the American people and the world OUR justice system feels it is necessary to sentence 84 year old Sister Megan Rice to 3 years in prison for her roll in an anti-nuclear weapons protest at the Dept of Defense's Oak Ridge, TN facility in 2012. WHO say's America doesn't have political prisoners????? See my original post on the protest at Peace activists close nuclear facility, cause historic security breach http://bucknacktssordidtawdryblog.blogspot.com/2012/08/peace-activists-close-nuclear-facility.html

Lefty Coaster

Today a defiant 84 year old Nun named Megan Rice was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Amul Thapar to three years in prison for deliberately trespassing at DOE's Oak Ridge Tennessee facility to protest nuclear weapons in 2012.

Nun, 84, gets 3 years in prison for breaking in nuclear weapons complex NASHVILLE, Tenn. - An 84-year-old nun was sentenced Tuesday to nearly three years in prison for breaking into a U.S. nuclear weapons complex and defacing a bunker holding bomb-grade uranium, a demonstration that exposed serious security flaws.
The other two protesters who took part were sentenced to five years in prison.
On July 28, 2012, the three activists cut through three fences before reaching a $548 million storage bunker. They hung banners, strung crime-scene tape and hammered off a small chunk of the fortress-like Highly Enriched Uranium Materials Facility inside the most secure part of complex. They painted messages such as, "The fruit of justice is peace," and splashed baby bottles of human blood on the bunker wall.
Oh my!
Although the protesters set off alarms, they were able to spend more than two hours inside the restricted area before they were caught. When security finally arrived, guards found the three activists singing and offering to break bread with them. The protesters reportedly also offered to share a Bible, candles and white roses with the guards.
This incident was a big embarrassment to officials at DOE. The DOE's security contractor was fired eventually.
Some government officials praised the activists for exposing the facility's weaknesses. But prosecutors declined to show leniency, instead pursing serious felony charges. Rice testified at trial that she was surprised the group made it all the way to the interior of the secured zone without being challenged and that plant operations were suspended.
"That stunned me," she said. "I can't believe they shut down the whole place."
Obviously these three activists expected to be arrested soon after entering the facility.
U.S. District Judge Amul Thapar said he was concerned they showed no remorse and he wanted the punishment to be a deterrent for other activists.
In other words they were given harsh sentences for a protest to discourage other protests involving civil disobedience, like trespassing. Eric Holder's DOJ seems overly concerned with severely punishing protesters like Megan Rice, and whistle blowers, while the Banksters from Wall Street get to walk.
Its very likely that Obama's State Department will soon condemn the treatment of protesters in Kiev, but how about American protesters right here in the US receiving harsh prison sentences?

Originally posted to Lefty Coaster on Tue Feb 18, 2014 at 09:17 PM PST.

Also republished by Three Star Kossacks. 

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/02/19/1278688/-Judge-sentences-84-year-old-Nun-to-3-years-for-2012-Oak-Ridge-Anti-Nuclear-Weapons-protest?detail=action 

29 June 2012

Military Contractor Human Trafficking - Documents Released Under FOIA from THE ACLU 27JUN12

THIS report from the ACLU documents the illegal and immoral activities of U.S. government contractors, mostly military contractors, who are supposed to not only be working for us but representing us, the American people and government, around the world. Not only are these corporations greedy, but by tolerating these actions they prove they are sick and twisted. The ACLU is calling on Congress to crack down on these rogue operations, click the link to sign on....
REPORT: Victims of Complacency: The Ongoing Trafficking and Abuse of Third Country Nationals by U.S. Government Contractors
In July 2011 the ACLU filed a lawsuit demanding that the government release documents relating to the trafficking and the abusive treatment of foreign workers on U.S. military bases in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) case, brought on behalf of the Iraqi Refugee Assistance Project, seeks documents from the Departments of State and Defense that detail audits and complaints about military contractors working in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The complaint can be found at www.aclu.org/human-rights/military-contractor-human-trafficking-complaint
The FOIA request can be found at www.aclu.org/human-rights/military-contractor-human-trafficking-foia-req...
Released FOIA Documents
 

Victims of Complacency: The Ongoing Trafficking and Abuse of Third Country Nationals by U.S. Government Contractors

18 December 2010

From an Airman: Why 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Doesn't Work for Me 18DEZ10

NOT from any military wannabe, not from any politician seeking to score political points, but from and active duty member of the U.S.A.F. and a member of the ACLU

(Kristoffer Berrien has served in the U.S. Air Force nearly 17 years as an Avionics Specialist on multiple aircraft. Currently a reservist stationed at Travis Air Force Base in Fairfield, Calif., Kristoffer lives in the Sacramento area with his wife, who is also in the Air Force, and three children. He has been deployed in support of numerous operations, including Iraqi Freedom, Enduring Freedom, and Joint Forge. His comments are his alone, made as civilian not a member of the military, and do not reflect the views of the Air Force or Department of Defense in any way. He's also a member of the board of directors of the ACLU of Sacramento.)
When I put on my uniform and go to work, I’m simply doing what small part I can to protect this country I love so dearly. I work alongside men and women I trust with my life. It has never once crossed my mind that if the airman next to me is gay I should put any less faith in his ability to do the job.
Because I am in the military, I am a person who "don't ask, don't tell" directly affects, not some pundit who posts comments on the internet and easily passes judgment. I have served nearly 20 years of my life in support of this country and sacrificed much for my service, yet I'm conflicted. Though proud to say I am a member of the greatest military force in the world, I'm ashamed of the way we treat a small minority of our service members who feel exactly the same way I do about this country and about serving it.
I am not required by law to lie or hide who I am from my fellow airmen because I am not gay. I have no worries about discussing who I'm interested in, dating, or married to. We in the military are just like everybody else in this country. We have friends, we talk about our dreams, and we seek companionship. Imagine taking that freedom away from someone; forcing them to conceal who they really are because it might make some of us feel uncomfortable.
The military is a diverse force and its members share varying viewpoints; in this way it’s not unlike the civilian population. Of course, there are stereotypes and prejudices about gays at every level, but the more people become informed and aware gay people are our friends and coworkers, the more attitudes change.
As a supervisor in the Air Force frequently tasked to evaluate job performance, I understand the importance of focusing on a person’s character and work history, and would not give a thought to their sexual orientation.
During temporary duty assignments, you form a bond and become close with the personnel you are working with. Often there is only one individual assigned per specialty and you count on that person to do his or her job and likewise they count on you. We rely on each other, not just for specific military expertise, but also as travel companions and as friends.
In my experience, after developing the friendship and trust of a fellow airman over many years and deployments, it’s often they can finally open up and discuss their true identity. This conversation is never taken lightly and often confirms something I may have suspected already.
I read and hear news reports about gay people currently serving in today’s military, and people talk as though it were an abstract idea. Gay men and lesbians may be serving among us, but the military can’t know for sure. The fact is, gay people are everywhere in the military, including the Air Force. They are flying multimillion dollar aircraft, standing guard at the gate entrances, processing pay documents, and attending to wounded airmen.
One experience I had solidified the fact that sexual orientation has no effect on trust, intelligence and professionalism. In one squadron, the head crew chief of an aircraft was a lesbian as well as an incredible airwoman. She was known for her aircraft being immaculately tended to as well as having a stellar mission capable rate. This is the bottom line of aircraft maintenance in the Air Force: getting your plane off the ground and the mission accomplished. When we sign off the aircraft’s forms stating the aircraft is safe to fly, pilots can take off in confidence, not caring about the sexual orientation of its maintenance crew.
The Air Force has afforded me many opportunities in life. I’m a walking advertisement for recruitment because of my long and rewarding career. Some may question the wisdom of a service member with so much time invested and a promising career ahead openly discussing "don't ask, don't tell". But, as a father and example to three young boys, as a career airman, and most importantly an American citizen, I truly believe that we cannot be afraid to stand up and be vocal for what we believe in.
In my personal opinion, the Air Force and Department of Defense are doing the best they can to not tolerate discrimination and to not go on witch hunts. They are merely following a policy that as the recently released Pentagon report shows, a majority of its members do not support.
I watch the news and feel powerless, wondering if this is finally the time “don’t ask, don’t tell” will end. This policy has haunted my conscience throughout my entire career.
I just hope by the time I honorably retire, I will be retiring from a military that treats all of its valuable men and women equally. This basic freedom is at the heart of why I joined the military in the first place and what makes this country worth fighting for.
Repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" is now a stand-alone bill that has passed the House and could be voted on in the Senate as early as Saturday. Please join with Kristoffer and the ACLU in telling Congress to get the job done this year. Repeal DADT NOW!

26 August 2010

$960 BILLION IN DEFENSE DEPARTMENT FAT 25AUG10

THE Defense budget should be subject to the same scrutiny all other department budgets are subject to, and if waste and abuse are found they should be deleted from the budget and returned to the Treasury. The military-industrial complex's hold on our economy has to be broken, and Reps Barney Frank (D-MA) and Ron Paul (R-TX) have a proposal in Congress to start this by trimming $960 billion in "defense" spending. Please see the campaign from TrueMajority below and participate by clicking the link to send a letter to your representative to support them. Former President Dwight D. Eisenhower may have said it best: "The United States should spend as much as necessary on national defense, but not a penny more."

TrueMajority
Dear Craig,

"Hey, Congress, trim the fat!"

Barney frank
Barney Frank wants to save billions. Will you help?
add your voice

We could cut over $960 billion from the Department of Defense and be just as safe as we are now. Perhaps even safer.

With the national debt continuing to soar, unemployment teetering around 10 percent and the threat of a double-dip recession hovering, the last thing we need is for a government bureaucracy rife with inefficiencies to continue costing us billions of dollars with no overhaul in sight.

But there is another way.

Led by Congressmen Barney Frank and Ron Paul, a bipartisan group in Congress is demanding an honest look at military spending without sacrificing our safety.

The good news? Over $960 billion could be cut without endangering our current safeguards and programs. The bad news? This opportunity is probably not on your member of Congress's radar.

Which is why we need your help. Send a message to your member of Congress, asking him or her to sign on in support of Congressman Frank's effort to clean up the wasteful spending in the Pentagon!

We'd like to believe that our military power stems directly from a financially sound American government and a vibrant economy that supports not just the protection of the people, but the education, health and well-being of the people as well.

But we have to speak up for what we believe.

Will you tell your representative to help put an end to wasteful government spending by supporting Congressman Frank's letter?

Former President Dwight D. Eisenhower may have said it best: "The United States should spend as much as necessary on national defense, but not a penny more."

We hope Congress thinks so too.

17 June 2010

HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST RIGHTS WIRE E MAIL NEWSLETTER 17JUN10

Beaten to death for Using the Internet?
Police Brutality in Egypt
Join a Web chat with Egyptian Activist/Blogger Nora Younis
Last week, 28 year old Khaled Saeed was at an Internet café in Alexandria, Egypt when two police officers came in and demanded to see everyone's ID cards. Saeed protested, and what happened next is shocking: witnesses report that the police brutally beat Saeed to death, threw him into their car and later dumped his battered body on the street.  Read our blog for more detail.
Repressive tactics and violence against activists has become increasingly common in Egypt, but this incident is different-Egyptian police carried out this brutal attack in broad daylight, in full view of eyewitnesses. In Tuesday's Washington Post Egyptian activist Saad Eddin Ibrahim, winner of HRF's 2002 Human Rights Award, writes that U.S. policy towards Egypt is emboldening the regime.
Nora Younis, our 2008 Human Rights Award winner, was at protests in Egypt this weekend and witnessed violent police tactics there. Nora has agreed to share her on-the-ground perspective in a web chat next Monday. Send us your questions in advance via Twitter (@humanrights1st) or email (communications@humanrightsfirst.org). Watch our website or Facebook page for details.
On the Campaign Trail in Philly
On the campaign trail in Philly
This month, Human Rights First gathered a group of retired military leaders in Philadelphia for meetings with eleven congressional candidates from varied political parties in Pennsylvania and Delaware. In private meetings with the candidates, the retired generals and admirals made the case that military commissions give terrorists a warrior status they don't deserve; instead, they should be treated like criminals and tried in our federal courts.
Retired four-star Marine Corps generals Joseph Hoar and Charles Krulak, who co-chair the group of retired generals and admirals, also took this message to the public with an opinion piece in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette and a radio spot that aired on the top news-talk stations in Pittsburgh, Philadelphia and around the state, reaching more than 800,000 listeners.
While we were in Philadelphia, President Bush was in Michigan where he remarked to the press that he'd waterboard again "to save lives." The military leaders reacted strongly to this cavalier support for torture. Talking to congressional candidates about how we treat detainees is an important part of our efforts to make sure these mistaken policies are a thing of the past.
Lend your voice: sign our petition to close Guantanamo and use our courts!
Arguing against Indefinite Detention Law: Judges, Proof, Reason
New Report: Habeas Works
As the Obama administration continues to detain people indefinitely without charge or trial at Guantanamo, some commentators and legislators are calling on Congress to authorize wartime detention. The Supreme Court, however, ruled clearly in its 2008 Boumediene decision that deciding whether detention is lawful is a job for our courts.
What do federal judges think? Human Rights First and the Constitution Project issued a report examining how federal courts have handled the cases of Guantanamo detainees who have challenged the legality of their detention through habeas corpus. Endorsed by a group of distinguished retired federal judges, the report concludes that legislation is not only unnecessary, it would be counterproductive. Congress should not authorize detention without charge.
Read commentary on our blog and Huffington Post.
Talking to Congress about Foreign Aid
Elisa Massimino testifies before Congress
When Congress passed the Foreign Assistance Act in 1961, the U.S. was deep in a Cold War, and the idea of universal rights was a relatively new concept. Today, nearly 50 years later, the law governing how the U.S. thinks about foreign aid is badly in need of an overhaul.
Congress is poised to take on this important task, and Human Rights First is working to make sure that promoting human rights is seen as a core objective of U.S. aid.
HRF President and CEO Elisa Massimino, testified before Congress this month at the first hearing to address these issues. Massimino gave practical recommendations on how to align foreign assistance with human rights goals, including making sure aid does not assist or embolden human rights violators, making sure that aid is part of a broader strategy to promote human rights in each country, and getting all parts of the U.S. government to promote these goals. Read her testimony for details.
World Refugee Day
World Refugee Day
Right now in Kyrgyzstan, tens of thousands of people are fleeing their homes to seek refuge from ethnic and political violence. Forty-five thousand of them have crossed the border into Uzbekistan, but the Uzbek government has just closed the border. The plight of those forced to flee for their lives is a grim reminder of why the right to seek asylum from persecution is enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and why we mark those commitments every year on World Refugee Day.
Human Rights First is working to ensure that refugees arriving on U.S. shores are treated with the respect and dignity they deserve. Our asylum program wins over 90% of its cases and has helped thousands of refugees find safe haven.
But there are systemic problems that need to be resolved.  We will be on Capitol Hill next week to rally congressional support behind the Refugee Protection Act, which would fix problems in the U.S. asylum system such as long delays, poor conditions of detention, denials based on false claims, and other issues that harm those we should protect.
We need your help. Ask your senators to cosponsor this critical bill.
Watch our video on the importance of the original Refugee Act.
Will Veteran Journalists Be Allowed to Cover Military Commissions at Gitmo Later this Month?
The Defense Department recently banned four journalists from covering military commission proceedings at Guantanamo as punishment for releasing the name of an "anonymous" witness in the Omar Khadr trial.
The name of this "anonymous" witness has been public for years-and even appears on Khadr's Wikipedia page.
Human Rights First quickly organized a letter to the Defense Department - but we need your help to make sure that the public is informed about what happens at Guantanamo.  Barring journalists with experience covering Guantanamo from the island would severely hamper the public's right to know and understand what goes on there.
Tell the Defense Department to let these reporters go to Guantanamo for the upcoming hearings. Sign our petition before the hearings start later this month.
 HRF in the News
HRF President Elisa Massimino took on the head of Facebook in a letter to the Washington Post regarding Facebook privacy issues. Pointing out that repressive governments have used information to target and persecute critics, she writes, "So long as Facebook bases its privacy policies on the belief that privacy is an outdated notion being replaced by a principle of 'openness,' it will continue to put its users at risk and will play a dangerous role in degrading a fundamental human right that, in many countries, has life or death consequences." Read the full letter.