Yesterday, three U.S. Senators strongly questioned Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta about U.S. contracts with the Russian arms dealer Rosoboronexport — the same company selling billions in arms to Syria. Panetta didn't have an answer. Keep the pressure on and tell Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta to cease all contracts with Rosoboronexport now. Together we will make a difference. —Tom | |||||||||||||||||||
The death toll in Syria is now frequently exceeding 100 civilians a day. Men, women and children are being targeted by the Syrian government — and the United States is doing business with the same company supplying weapons to this brutal regime. The U.S government has signed a contract for nearly $1 billion in business with Rosoboronexport — the Russian arms dealer that supplies the Syrian government with weapons capable of targeting homes and streets and murdering thousands of innocent Syrian civilians. Tell Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta to cease all contracts with Rosoboronexport now. The situation in Syria is intensifying. The Syrian regime is slaughtering innocent civilians every day. And 25,000 Syrian citizens have registered as refugees, almost 200,000 people are now displaced within Syria, and the humanitarian situation is rapidly deteriorating. While the United States calls on the world to sanction Syria's government, our own Department of Defense is signing contracts with a company that has provided $4 billion dollars' worth of weapons to the Syrian regime. This is unconscionable. Condemning Syria's regime is not enough. We must also condemn those who are engaging in business with the regime — and especially those that provide the means to enable the continued slaughter. But the United States is entering into contracts with the same company that is responsible for supplying weapons to the Syrian government and providing their military with the means to perpetrate widespread and systematic attacks on civilians. Demand that Secretary Panetta stop doing business with Rosoboronexport — the company responsible for supplying weapons to Syria's murderous government. Thank you for your support. Together we will make a difference in the lives of people facing mass atrocities in Syria. Sincerely, Tom Andrews President United to End Genocide | |||||||||||||||||||
ABOUT UNITED TO END GENOCIDE Syria Crisis: Idlib Assaulted By Regime Troopshttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/10/syria-crisis-idlib_n_1336541.html?ref=topbarBy ELIZABETH A. KENNEDY, Associated Press BEIRUT -- Syrian troops pushed ahead with a new assault on the northern region of Idlib on Saturday, shelling one of the centers of the uprising against President Bashar Assad's rule and sending families fleeing for safety as armed rebels tried to fend off the attack. Thick black smoke billowed into the sky. The military operation has raised fears that the regime is planning a new all-out offensive in Idlib like the bloody siege last month that captured a restive part of the city of Homs, further south. While the fighting raged, U.N. envoy Kofi Annan met with Assad in Damascus during a high-profile international mission trying to bring a halt to fighting and arrange talks between the two sides to end the country's yearlong conflict. But the mission was already hitting dead ends. Assad told Annan that any political dialogue was doomed to fail "as long as there are armed terrorist groups that work to spread anarchy and destabilize the country," according to the state news agency SANA. The regime blames terrorists acting out a foreign conspiracy for the uprising, not protesters seeking change. The opposition as well has rejected dialogue, saying it is impossible to talk to Assad's regime after a crackdown that the U.N. estimates has killed more than 7,500 people. Activists put the toll even higher, at more than 8,000. In the town of Idlib, a number of families fled, clutching their belongings, according to an Associated Press team in the town, the main center of the northern region. A group of women and children huddled with blankets in a room of one building. Troops that are moving in place to encircle the town battered it with dozens of tanks shells from dawn until noon, the AP team said. Armed opposition fighters dashed through the streets, taking cover behind the corners of buildings in clashes with the troops. Wounded fighters were pulled into trucks to be sped to clinics for treatment. A group of men used shovels to destroy speed bumps along one street to allow ambulances and other rescue vehicles to drive faster. Military reinforcements have been pouring into Idlib this week, including dozens of tanks and armored personnel carriers, activists said, reporting that dozens have been killed in the area in recent days. Their casualty reports could not be independently confirmed. The moves suggested the regime was now turning its focus on Idlib after recapturing the rebel-held district of Baba Amr in the central city of Homs, in a monthlong assault that reportedly killed hundreds and devastated the district. The Homs bloodshed further fueled calls among Arab countries and the West for action to stop the crisis, which many fear is moving closer to civil war as the opposition turns more to armed resistance. The U.N. estimates that more than 7,500 people have been killed since Syria launched its crackdown on the uprising, which began a year ago as peaceful protests against Assad. Activists put the toll at more than 8,000. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov sought to defend his country's stance on the crisis before Arab leaders, angered by Moscow's blocking of international pressure on Syria's president to step down. Last month, just as the Homs offensive was heating up, Russia and China vetoed a draft U.N. Security Council resolution that would have supported an Arab League peace plan calling on Assad to hand over his powers. That brought accusations that Russia, a longtime Assad ally, was giving Assad diplomatic cover to intensify his crackdown. "We are not protecting any regimes," Lavrov insisted at a heated session of the Arab League in Cairo on Saturday. "We are protecting international law ... We are not looking for a special prize or geopolitical interest here." He said Russia was trying to prevent "interference in domestic affairs of states, not to mention military interference" - something he hinted other Arab countries should be concerned about, given the upheaval of the Arab Spring the past year. "We certainly believe that all outside actors must be extremely careful in addressing problems which your countries are facing," he said. He said Russia was trying to "promote a peaceful resolution" to Syria's crisis and that the immediate mission now is to halt violence and enable humanitarian assistance to reach those in need in Syria. "If we agree to this, then we shall not really engage in discussing who is to blame" for the bloodshed, he said. "This could be done later by authority or international structure empowered to do this." Speaking after him, Qatar's prime minister sharply criticized Lavrov's remarks. "There is systematic genocide by the Syrian government," Sheik Hamad bin Jassem Al Thani said, adding that Arabs are not looking for a cease-fire anymore after "genocide" and "systematic killings" of Syrians. Annan's visit to Damascus marks a new international push for peace nearly a year after protesters took to the streets to demand Assad's ouster, inspired by Arab Spring uprisings in Tunisia and Egypt. Since then, the regime has dispatched snipers, tanks and civilian gunmen to crush dissent. As the death toll mounted, protests have spread, and some have taken up arms to defend themselves and attack government forces. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon told reporters Friday that Annan's priority is to immediately halt all fighting by government forces and opposition fighters - if not simultaneously, then first by government troops, followed by the opposition. Ban said a cease-fire should be quickly followed by inclusive political talks to resolve the yearlong conflict. But there is a widening gap between opposition leaders who say only military aid can stop Assad's regime, and Western powers who fear more weapons will exacerbate the conflict. So far, Western powers have declined to intervene. Unlike Libya, where a U.N.-sanctioned bombing campaign helped rebels topple Moammar Gadhafi last year, Syria has key allies in Iran and the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah, and shares a border with the region's closest American ally, Israel. Outright war in Syria could spark a regional conflagration. Annan, the former U.N. secretary-general, was appointed last month as the joint special envoy of the United Nations and the Arab League. ___ AP photographer Rodrigo Abd contributed from Idlib. AP correspondents Albert Aji in Damascus and Maggie Michael in Cairo contributed to this report. WARNING: Some of the images below contain graphic content. PLAY FULLSCREEN ZOOM Senate Hearing Probes U.S. Arms Purchases from Rosoboronexporthttp://www.humanrightsfirst.org/2012/03/07/senate-hearing-probes-u-s-arms-purchases-from-rosoboronexport/For Immediate Release: March 7, 2012 Washington, DC – Human Rights First today praised Senator John Cornyn (R-TX) for recognizing that U.S. arms purchases from a Russian company enabling atrocities in Syria “makes no sense.” Cornyn raised the U.S. Defense Department’s purchase of arms from Rosoboronexport – a Syrian arms provider – during today’s Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on Syria featuring Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Martin Dempsey.“Senator Cornyn hit the nail on the head today,” said Human Rights First’s Sadia Hameed. “It makes absolutely no sense for the U.S. to continue doing business with companies that are so clearly enabling atrocities. It’s hard for the U.S. to have credibility in pushing for a cease fire in Syria when it’s buying arms from the same company supplying those carrying out the ongoing atrocities there.” Russia remains the top supplier of weapons to Syria and recent reports from human rights monitoring organizations confirm that Russian weapons have been found at the site of atrocities in Homs. According to Thomson Reuters, at least four cargo ships have left a Russian port used by Rosoboronexport for the Syrian port of Tartus since December 2011, and another Russian ship carrying ammunition and sniper rifles, a weapon Syrian forces have used on protestors, docked in Cyprus in January before delivering its cargo to Syria. In January, Rosoboronexport signed a deal with the Syrian government to sell 36 combat jets capable of hitting ground targets, and the company’s chief spokesperson Vyacheslav N. Davidenk recently declared his intention to continue supplying arms to Syria. Rosoboronexport benefits from a nearly $1 billion contract with the U.S. Department of Defense—signed on May 26, 2011, months after the crackdown began. The U.S. signed a no-bid, fixed price foreign sales contract worth $375 million to purchase the Mi series of rotorcrafts and spare parts with an estimated completion date of March 26, 2016. The contract reportedly comes with an option for $550 million in additional purchases, raising the total to nearly $1 billion. Public contract records show ongoing business between the U.S. Army and Rosoboronexport, with a transaction as recent as November 3, 2011. The United States can withdraw from this contract at any point. When questioned about the contract, Secretary Panetta confirmed the purchase of the Mi-series helicopters for the Afghan Army, but stated that he was not sure if the company it sourced from was Rosoboronexport. In a follow-up question, Dempsey speculated that the sale may have been the result of a competitive bid, which all public reports indicate it was not. Senators Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) and Carl Levin (D-MI) echoed concerns about continued trade with Rosoboronexport. Human Rights First encourages the Defense Department to immediately provide the Committee with more details and answer why this contract would continue given the ongoing atrocities in Syria and Russia’s enabling role. “The American people deserve answers about why the U.S. is doing business with those who are so closely aligned with the atrocities in Syria. It’s time for the U.S. to reevaluate this deal,” Hameed concluded. For more information or to speak with Hameed, please contact Brenda Bowser Soder at bowsersoderb@humanrightsfirst.org or 202-370-3323 | |||||||||||||||||||
NORTON META TAG
Showing posts with label HRF Human Rights First. Show all posts
Showing posts with label HRF Human Rights First. Show all posts
10 March 2012
Exposed -- U.S. doing business with Syrian arms supplier 8MAR12 & Syria Crisis: Idlib Assaulted By Regime Troops 10MAR12 & Senate Hearing Probes U.S. Arms Purchases from Rosoboronexport 7MAR12
IT is unbelievable the American government is dealing with a major Russian arms supplier to the Syrian government while assad is slaughtering thousands of Syrians for demanding freedom, democracy and human rights. This must stop now! I am ashamed the American government is dealing with rosoboronexport while the Syrian people die every day struggling for their freedom. Please sign the petition to Sec of Defense Panetta demanding ALL contracts with rosoboronexport be ended now. And check out the article from Human Rights First in the U.S. governments dealings with rosoboronexport....
01 September 2011
Tell the Bahraini King: Kansas City Wants Its Freedom Medal Back! 1SEP11
THE world hasn't forgotten the nonviolent struggle for freedom, democracy and human right by the people of Bahrain, or the brutality of the Bahraini government, along with troops from Saudi Arabia, in violently repressing them. Please join HRF in asking the mayor of Kansas City to revoke the Medal of Freedom that was given to king hamad bin isa al khalifa and ask him to denounce the king and his government for their continuing violence and repression against their own people.
|
20 January 2011
NETIZENS, FIGHTING AGAINST REPRESSION AROUND THE WORLD from HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST
(http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/busines
s/internet/index.aspx) Meet our featured netizens: journalists, activists and bloggers from around the world who use the Internet and communications technology as organizing tools. Listen as they discuss their experiences with Internet freedom and the challenges they face in repressive societies.
30 October 2010
Standing up for Human Rights-in Uganda, Hungary, Egypt, and the U.S., HRF RIGHTS WIRE 29OKT10
UPDATES and actions to participate in on terrorism trials, asylum seekers, defamation of religion (see previous post on this blog or click the link below), elections in Egypt, LGBT rights in Uganda, Hungary and more....
Human Rights First, 333 Seventh Avenue, 13th Floor, New York, NY 10001-5004 www.humanrightsfirst.org Join us on Facebook, Follow us on Twitter |
How American ideals won in Qur'an burning controversy 1OKT10
FREEDOM won this battle because we have the freedom to speak out. We showed the world we stand for the freedom of religion AND free speech, that the two can exist and be practiced without violence. The nations who are promoting this restrictive resolution at the U.N. need to do some serious introspection and consider the lack of basic human rights in their own nations, and accept the International Declaration of Human Rights as passed by the U.N.
Recently, anti-Muslim incidents in the United States sparked deadly protests in Afghanistan, marches in India and Indonesia, and the burning of Israeli and American flags in Iran and Pakistan. General Petraeus spoke out to remind Americans that actions here in the United States directly impact our ability to achieve our objectives overseas. His message was clear: the world is watching what we do. Fortunately, with the spotlight upon us, we have some positive lessons to share with the rest of the world about what an effective response to bigotry and hate speech looks like. And these lessons are particularly relevant as the UN General Assembly takes up again efforts to establish a global code against blasphemy.

(Pakistani Muslims burn a US flag during a protest in Lahore on September 19, 2010, against earlier threats by US pastor Terry Jones to burn copies of the Muslim holy book, the Koran.)For over a decade, Pakistan, Egypt and some other predominantly Muslim countries have successfully promoted resolutions at the United Nations which argue that it is necessary to criminalize anti-religious hate speech (or "defamation") in order to protect freedom of religion. It would be tempting to view recent anti-Muslim incidents as evidence of why such legislation is needed.
In reality, criminalizing speech damages rather than advances efforts to combat religious intolerance. Such laws are all too often abused to stifle debate and dissent and can have devastating consequences for those holding religious views that differ from the majority religion. Journalists, bloggers, teachers, students, poets, religious converts and other individuals have been targeted, charged and sentenced to prison or received other punishments simply for exercising their right to freedom of expression.
The response to the aborted Koran burning event demonstrates how non-legal measures can effectively and successfully confront and counteract hatred and intolerance.
For starters, America's leaders got this one right. They affirmed their commitment to tolerance and diversity and ultimately drowned out the hateful rhetoric of an isolated extremist. Political, religious, and other leaders, including President Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, General David Petraeus, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon, Florida Governor Charlie Crist, and many others presented a clear message and a unified front against the Koran burning.
These high profile messages were joined by the voices of ordinary citizens and local political and religious leaders who successfully worked together to affirm religious solidarity. For example, in Gainesville, Florida more than 20 religious organizations united in hosting a series of interfaith events incorporating Muslim, Jewish, and Christian scriptures into worship services focused on peace and understanding. Members of the Gainesville community were also encouraged to attend a candlelight vigil and Iftar celebrations.
Their efforts ultimately led the Mayor of Gainesville to declare September 11th, the day of the planned Koran burning, as "Interfaith Solidarity Day" in the community. He also issued a statement condemning the "offensive behavior that has been directed at Muslim neighbors and those of the Islamic faith worldwide." Ultimately, they won. The planned "Burn a Koran Day" was cancelled.
Inspired by the success of efforts targeting the proposed Koran burning in Florida, communities and groups throughout the United States confronting similar anti-Muslim incidents have also united in opposition to intolerance.
Restricting speech is not the answer to fighting bigotry and hatred. What we need more of is condemnation of acts of hatred, as well as effective policies of inclusion, equality and protection of fundamental rights and freedoms.
Instead of creating internationally binding obligations that aim to criminalize the "defamation of religions," politicians should confront hate speech and efforts to defame religions with the mightiest weapon in their arsenal--their voices.
Tad Stahnke is the Director of Policy and Programs at Human Rights First.
Recently, anti-Muslim incidents in the United States sparked deadly protests in Afghanistan, marches in India and Indonesia, and the burning of Israeli and American flags in Iran and Pakistan. General Petraeus spoke out to remind Americans that actions here in the United States directly impact our ability to achieve our objectives overseas. His message was clear: the world is watching what we do. Fortunately, with the spotlight upon us, we have some positive lessons to share with the rest of the world about what an effective response to bigotry and hate speech looks like. And these lessons are particularly relevant as the UN General Assembly takes up again efforts to establish a global code against blasphemy.
(Pakistani Muslims burn a US flag during a protest in Lahore on September 19, 2010, against earlier threats by US pastor Terry Jones to burn copies of the Muslim holy book, the Koran.)
In reality, criminalizing speech damages rather than advances efforts to combat religious intolerance. Such laws are all too often abused to stifle debate and dissent and can have devastating consequences for those holding religious views that differ from the majority religion. Journalists, bloggers, teachers, students, poets, religious converts and other individuals have been targeted, charged and sentenced to prison or received other punishments simply for exercising their right to freedom of expression.
The response to the aborted Koran burning event demonstrates how non-legal measures can effectively and successfully confront and counteract hatred and intolerance.
For starters, America's leaders got this one right. They affirmed their commitment to tolerance and diversity and ultimately drowned out the hateful rhetoric of an isolated extremist. Political, religious, and other leaders, including President Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, General David Petraeus, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon, Florida Governor Charlie Crist, and many others presented a clear message and a unified front against the Koran burning.
These high profile messages were joined by the voices of ordinary citizens and local political and religious leaders who successfully worked together to affirm religious solidarity. For example, in Gainesville, Florida more than 20 religious organizations united in hosting a series of interfaith events incorporating Muslim, Jewish, and Christian scriptures into worship services focused on peace and understanding. Members of the Gainesville community were also encouraged to attend a candlelight vigil and Iftar celebrations.
Their efforts ultimately led the Mayor of Gainesville to declare September 11th, the day of the planned Koran burning, as "Interfaith Solidarity Day" in the community. He also issued a statement condemning the "offensive behavior that has been directed at Muslim neighbors and those of the Islamic faith worldwide." Ultimately, they won. The planned "Burn a Koran Day" was cancelled.
Inspired by the success of efforts targeting the proposed Koran burning in Florida, communities and groups throughout the United States confronting similar anti-Muslim incidents have also united in opposition to intolerance.
Restricting speech is not the answer to fighting bigotry and hatred. What we need more of is condemnation of acts of hatred, as well as effective policies of inclusion, equality and protection of fundamental rights and freedoms.
Instead of creating internationally binding obligations that aim to criminalize the "defamation of religions," politicians should confront hate speech and efforts to defame religions with the mightiest weapon in their arsenal--their voices.
Tad Stahnke is the Director of Policy and Programs at Human Rights First.
24 October 2010
Gitmo Trial Hits NYC; Manhattan Yawns (WATCH THE VIDEO) from HRF 1OKT10
BY THE BY, the terrorism trial of Guantanamo detainee Ahmed Ghailani has been going on in Federal Court in NYC WITHOUT ANY TERRORIST ATTACKS ON THE CITY, AND WITHOUT THE CITY BEING PARALYZED BY MASSIVE SECURITY BY THE GOVERNMENT OR FEAR AMONG CITY RESIDENTS, WORKERS AND TOURIST. This from Human Rights First.......
| ||
Human Rights First, 333 Seventh Avenue, 13th Floor, New York, NY 10001-5004 www.humanrightsfirst.org Join us on Facebook, Follow us on Twitter |
09 September 2010
OPPOSE KORAN BURNING AND GET YOUR 'AMERICANS DON'T BURN BOOKS' BOOKMARK from HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST 9SEP10
Get your free bookmark opposing "Burn a Koran Day"—and spread the word!. |
President Obama. General Petraeus. The Pope.
World leaders are speaking out against the "Burn a Koran" event scheduled for September 11th. It's hateful and dangerous.
Despite the outcry, Terry Jones and the Dove World Outreach Center are moving forward with their event. In fact, they posted five MORE reasons to burn a Koran on their blog just yesterday.
Human Rights First pushed back: We decided to build our own list—using responses from over 5,000 supporters like you!—of "10 Reasons NOT to burn a Koran." We posted the final list yesterday on our blog, Huffington Post, FireDogLake, and other media outlets. Thanks to those of you who contributed!
Here's the Top 10 list:
Ten Reasons NOT to Burn a Koran
- Book burning! Do I really need to say why?
- By not burning a Koran I'm not burning a bridge to communication.
- Burning the Koran because of extremist Taliban and Al-Qaeda terrorists makes no more sense than burning the Bible because of the Ku Klux Klan or Nazis.
- Hatred breeds more hatred and that is not going to solve any of our problems.
- That type of hate-filled religious intolerance has no place anywhere in the world, and is especially abhorrent in a country where religious freedom is one of the pillars of its foundation.
- It's a sacred book to millions of people. We should respect all people's beliefs.
- It will only inflame. I'd like people to understand each other.
- I may not believe in the words of the Koran but I would never burn one out of respect for my fellow humans who do.
- Support our troops!
- We must learn to coexist. We cannot continue to live in fear and suspicion.
Sincerely,
Sharon Kelly McBride
Communications Director
P.S. Want to support our work? Click here to make a donation. Every gift is tax deductible and supports our programs to stand up for religious tolerance and basic human dignity.
03 September 2010
WILL GEORGE W BUSH SPEAK OUT? from HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST 3SEP10
WILL George W Bush speak out, does he have the moral backbone and courage to take a stand against the hate, prejudice, bigotry and fear being spread by tea-baggers and right-wing fanatics, flames of intolerance being fanned by the likes of glenn beck, sarah palin and fox "news"? Click the header to join the call for former Pres G.W. Bush to stand up for religious freedom like he did after 9/11.

| ||
| Human Rights First, 333 Seventh Avenue, 13th Floor, New York, NY 10001-5004 www.humanrightsfirst.org Join us on Facebook, Follow us on Twitter |
Labels:
9/11,
Christianity,
civil rights,
fear,
first amendment,
freedom of religion,
george w bush,
glenn beck,
hate,
HRF Human Rights First,
ignorance,
Islam,
Park51,
prejudice,
sarah palin,
tea-baggers
13 August 2010
HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST RIGHTS WIRE E MAIL NEWSLETTER 13AUG10
ARTICLES on Blood Diamonds & Sierra Leone and charles taylor, Gitmo, Egypt, elections, the Omar Khadr trial, human rights, labor......
|
22 July 2010
HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST RIGHTS WIRE E MAIL NEWSLETTER 19JUL10
| HRF'S E-NEWSLETTER | July 19, 2010 | EMAIL TO A FRIEND» | DONATE» |
Human Rights First is working with Google and other information technology companies to develop guidelines and practices to protect the right to free expression and privacy. In a meeting last week, we brought the voices of "netizens"—journalists, activists, and leaders using new technology to promote human rights and democratic values—from around the world to executives of these companies. As the activists in our video make clear, Internet freedom is essential to those fighting for human rights in repressive societies. It can sometimes be a question of life or death. Click here to watch the video. Many companies understand what's at stake, and are doing what they can. But we need our elected leaders to help make Internet freedom a priority. The Obama Administration recently announced that the White House will soon host a state dinner for China. Let's make sure that censorship is on the main menu and not just washed over with the dishes. Sign our petition to President Obama asking that he raise the question of Internet freedom when he hosts President Hu Jintao at the White House. Sincerely, Elisa Massimino President and CEO Human Rights First A Step Toward Justice for Man Beaten to Death by Police in Egypt; Question of Internet Freedom Lingers HRF responded right away, organizing a web chat with Egyptian activist Nora Younis to get the word out on what was happening on the ground and creating a petition to the Egyptian ambassador to the United States to let him know that people here were paying attention. Sign the petition and watch a segment of the webchat with Nora. Two policemen have since been arrested on charges related to the beating—an important step toward accountability for this murder. We'll be keeping close watch on developments in the case and the repressive tactics the Egyptian government is using to intimidate those who use the Internet to promote freedom and democracy—particularly in the lead-up to the Egyptian elections this fall and early next year. Human Rights First's own David Levine—an Iraq war veteran who served under General Petraeus—tweeted his analysis live from the Petraeus confirmation hearing. Read his blog recap. We're now working with these retired admirals and generals to keep up the pressure to close Guantanamo and try terrorism suspects in federal courts. Read our press release for more about the ban and HRF's response. Countries across Europe, North America, and the former Soviet Union have committed to combat hate crime and discrimination – but they're not following through with their promises. In a report released by Human Rights First and the Anti-Defamation League we found that the large majority of the 56 states members of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) are failing to fully comply with their commitments to report on and respond to hate crimes. HRF staff used the report and our recommendations to urge further action to combat hate when we traveled to Kazakhstan recently for an OSCE conference where high-level government officials gathered to discuss states' strategies to combat intolerance and discrimination. Ahmed Mahmoud al Qosi, the 50 year-old man who is alleged to have been a cook for Osama bin Laden, pleaded guilty to assisting al Qaeda in a recent military commission proceedings. HRF's Daphne Eviatar was quoted in the press with her assessment: "Mr. al Qosi's case is a textbook example of the inability of the military commission system...to achieve swift justice. The case has dragged on for more than six years without a trial." Read the Associated Press article. |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)