NORTON META TAG

Showing posts with label Tar Sands Action. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tar Sands Action. Show all posts

10 November 2011

TAR SANDS ACTION Big news: We won. You won 10NOV11

PRES Obama and the U.S. State Dept punted on the keystone xl pipeline project. This is a victory of sorts (see the e mail from Bill McKibben of TarSands Action below) but the fight isn't over. Politically it is a smart move by the administration because it almost guarantees the support of the environmental community for his re-election campaign because if the final decision on the pipeline is going to be made after the 2012 presidential election environmentalist don't want a republican president controlled by big oil to make it. THAT is why TarSands Action is already planning for more actions against the pipeline, should it be approved. There will be a continuing PR campaign against the project, grass-roots lobbying of elected officials at all levels of government along the proposed route and in D.C. and Ottawa, and planning for civil disobedience if the pipeline is started. There are a couple of issues concerning the project I would like answers to....If one of the benefits of the keystone xl pipeline is to lessen American dependence on oil from the Middle East why build a pipeline all the way to the Gulf Coast when there are 4 refineries in Montana  http://www.eia.gov/state/state-energy-profiles.cfm?sid=MT , 6 in Wyoming  http://www.eia.gov/state/state-energy-profiles.cfm?sid=WY 1 in North Dakota http://www.eia.gov/state/state-energy-profiles.cfm?sid=ND  any of which could be expanded to increase their bbl/d (barrels per day) capacity and the refined product could then be tied into the current distribution system, which would probably have to be expanded along existing routes to accommodate increased production. Or why not refine it in Alberta at the tar sands and then send the product to the U.S.? But if the real plan is not to improve America's energy independence but to use American ports to export this oil then why not build the pipeline across Canada, either to Vancouver or to Montreal? Maybe transcanada can't get approval from the other provinces for a pipeline, they are not willing to accept the risk of massive, severe environmental damage from a company with a problematic pipeline history (as noted below the fight against a pipeline has already started in British Columbia). SO we get to celebrate for a few days, but the fight isn't over, the fat lady isn't even warming up for her song. Stay tuned....
Tar Sands Action
Um, we won. You won.

Not completely. The president didn’t outright reject the pipeline permit. My particular fantasy--that he would invite the 1253 people arrested on his doorstep in August inside the gates for a victory picnic by the vegetable garden--didn’t materialize.

But a few minutes ago the president sent the pipeline back to the State Department for a thorough re-review, which most analysts are saying will effectively kill the project. The president explicitly noted climate change, along with the pipeline route, as one of the factors that a new review would need to assess. There’s no way, with an honest review, that a pipeline that helps speed the tapping of the world’s second-largest pool of carbon can pass environmental muster.

And he has made clear that the environmental assessment won’t be carried out by cronies of the pipeline company--that it will be an expert and independent assessment. We will watch that process like hawks, making sure that it doesn’t succumb to more cronyism. Perhaps this effort will go some tiny way towards cleaning up the Washington culture of corporate dominance that came so dramatically to light here in emails and lobbyist disclosure forms.

It’s important to understand how unlikely this victory is. Six months ago, almost no one outside the pipeline route even knew about Keystone. One month ago, a secret poll of “energy insiders” by the National Journal found that “virtually all” expected easy approval of the pipeline by year’s end.  As late as last week the CBC reported that Transcanada was moving huge quantities of pipe across the border and seizing land by eminent domain, certain that its permit would be granted. A done deal has come spectacularly undone.

The American people spoke loudly about climate change and the president responded. There have been few even partial victories about global warming in recent years so that makes this an important day.

The president deserves thanks for making this call--it’s not easy in the face of the fossil fuel industry and its endless reserves of cash. The deepest thanks, however, go to you: to our indigenous peoples who began the fight, to the folks in Nebraska who rallied so fiercely, to the scientists who explained the stakes, to the environmental groups who joined with passionate common purpose, to the campuses that lit up with activity, to the faith leaders that raised a moral cry, to the labor leaders who recognized where our economic future lies, to the Occupy movement that helped galvanize revulsion at insider dealing, and most of all to the people in every state and province who built the movement that made this decision inevitable.

Our fight, of course, is barely begun. Some in our movement will say that this decision is just politics as usual: that the president wants us off the streets - and off his front lawn - until after the election, at which point the administration can approve the pipeline, alienating its supporters without electoral consequence. The president should know that If this pipeline proposal somehow reemerges from the review process we will use every tool at our disposal to keep it from ever being built; if there’s a lesson of the last few months, both in our work and in the Occupy encampments around the world, it’s that sometimes we have to put our bodies on the line.
We need to let the president and oil companies know that we're ready to take action should they try to push this pipeline through in a couple of years. There's a pledge to take nonviolent action against the pipeline up on our site, and I'll be keeping your names an emails safely stored away so that you'll be the first to know about anything we need to do down the road. You can sign the pledge here: http://www.tarsandsaction.org/pledge

In the meantime, since federal action will be in abeyance for a long stretch, we need to figure out how best to support our Canadian brothers and sisters, who are effectively battling against proposed pipelines west from the tar sands to the Pacific. And we need to broaden our work to take on all the forms of ‘extreme energy’ now coming to the fore: mountaintop removal coal mining, deepsea oil drilling, fracking for gas and oil. We’ll keep sending you updates from tarsandsaction.org; you keep letting us know what we need to do next.

Last week, scientists announced that the planet had poured a record amount of co2 into the atmosphere last year; that’s a sign of how desperate our battle is. But we take courage from today’s White House announcement; it gives us some clues about how to fight going forward.

And I simply can’t say thank you enough. I know, because of my own weariness, how hard so many of you have worked. It was good work, done in the right spirit, and it has secured an unlikely victory. You are the cause of that victory; you upended enormous odds.

I’m going to bed tired tonight. But I’ll get up in the morning ready for the next battle, more confident because I know you’re part of this fight too.

Bill McKibben, for tarsandsaction.org
Click here to unsubscribe
empowered by Salsa

29 September 2011

TAR SANDS ACTION UPDATE 28SEP11

UPDATES on actions plans for protest on 7 OKT and 6 NOV by Tar Sands Action....
Tar Sands Action
Friends-
I have a few important updates to add to the letter I sent around earlier this week.
I'm incredibly pleased by the group of folks on board to support this next phase of our work together - any time you have someone like Tim DeChristopher, who is still sitting in jail for his brave stand against the oil industry, joining with a former White House official like Gus Speth, along with the incredible other organizers and movement leaders who co-signed with them, you can be sure that something special is in store.
It's very important that we continue thinking and acting big, because we don't have much time: the President will be making a decision by the end of the year. I wanted to send you another note to help explain in a little more depth what we have planned:
First: Over 1000 people have already signed up for our big action on November 6th, one year from the next election, when we're going to try to encircle the White House in a giant, solemn protest. We've never tried something this big before - our goal here is to make it clear just how big this movement is, as a reminder to the President that this pipeline is a threat to both our communities and his reelection chances.
We don't have all the plans worked out, but here's what we do know: this will be a daytime protest that will last for several hours, and you'll be able to participate without risking arrest. Hopefully this means we can get as many people as possible to be there. We're scoping it out now, but we're not sure how many people it will take to actually surround the White House.
However early signs are good: the response has been amazing. To join us at the White House, click here to sign up: http://www.tarsandsaction.org/sign-up
Between now and then, we have a lot of work to do as well. On October 7th, our friends in DC are holding a big rally outside the last State Department hearing, which is going to kick off a month of organizing across the country leading up to the 6th. For more information about the rally in DC, or to join, click here: http://www.tarsandsaction.org/october7th/
We're going to continue showing up at Presidential events (there were 4 different rallies like this in just the past 3 days) to bring our message directly to the president and the national press. Our organizing team is tracking his appearances, and if the President is coming to your neighborhood, they're ready to help you get his attention. Just get in touch by emailing us at info@tarsandsaction.org.
We're also going to step up our actions at local Organizing for America offices. This is our best way to reach the President's political advisors who will play a key role in the final decision. If they start seeing angry folks like you and I - particularly if you worked for or donated to his 2008 campaign - showing up at offices across the country, they'll definitely get the message that it's high time for the President to start acting like the guy we elected. (You know: the one who said that we would be the generation that finally ends the tyranny of oil, and that the oceans would rise and the planet would begin to heal on his watch)
You don't need to know all of the exact details to start pulling an action together. If you have a few folks near you who are interested, I suggest you set up an event on our site, and we'll be in touch to help you get started. Click here to get rolling: http://events.tarsandsaction.org/officevisits

OK, that's what I have for now. I'm really excited by all the work you've been doing, and I can't wait to see you again in DC.
-Bill
empowered by Salsa

23 September 2011

TransCanada pipeline lobbyist works all the angles with former colleagues 22SEP11

PROOF of the corruption in the U.S. State Dept concerning the keystone xl pipeline, a level of corruption always condemned by the U.S. government when it happens somewhere else....This from the Washington Post via Tar Sands Action.....

Did you read the Washington Post today?

If you didn't have a chance, here's what you missed: newly released emails show that an insider from Hillary Clinton's campaign, now a lobbyist, used his connections to push the State Department into OK'ing Keystone XL. The department's final report adopted some of his suggestions almost exactly, and the emails reveal an unprecedented level of coordination between the pipeline's corporate backers and the State Department to facilitate approval.

This just makes my last email about the upcoming protest at the final State Department hearing on Keystone XL even more important. The other side of this fight is putting pressure on President Obama using high-dollar lobbyists and insider connections. If we expect him to stand strong against this pressure and keep his promises to us, we're going to need to show him we're watching.

After the sit-ins earlier this summer, we know that the President's team will be watching this event to see if opposition to the pipeline continues. The rally is on Friday, October 7th, starting at Noon at the Ronald Reagan Building in Downtown DC. We'll be meeting at the 14th St. entrance of the building, between Pennsylvania Ave. and Constitution Ave.

Can you join us? http://www.tarsandsaction.org/october7th/

This is a critical moment for our work together to stop the pipeline. We're counting on this event to keep the pressure on the President, but also to inspire our friends across the country to join a month of escalating action that will end in a massive rally on November 6th back in DC. (More on this plan is coming next week)

I hope you can join the rally on the 7th, and then again on November 6th. We don't have any time to lose.

-Duncan

PS - Here's a link to that Washington Post article - definitely give it a read: http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/transcanada-pipeline-lobbyist-works-all-the-angles-with-former-colleagues/2011/09/16/gIQAYq3BnK_story.html

TransCanada pipeline lobbyist works all the angles with former colleagues


In lobbying for a presidential permit to construct a massive oil pipeline stretching from Canada to the Gulf Coast, TransCanada’s Paul Elliott has tried nearly every angle.
Elliott — who served as Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton’s national deputy campaign manager in 2008 — sought to broker multiple meetings between senior State Department officials and TransCanada executives. He offered to enlist Trans­Canada officials’ aid in helping State officials forge an international climate agreement. And he deluged administration officials with letters testifying to the virtues of the Keystone XL expansion project, which would ship crude oil from Canada’s oil sands region to American refiners.
The State Department, which completed its environmental assessment of the project last month, has indicated that it will decide later this year whether to allow the company to construct the 1,700-mile pipeline. across the U.S.-Canada border.
More than two dozen State Department e-mails obtained by the advocacy group Friends of the Earth under a Freedom of Information Act request provide an unusual glimpse into the lobbying for the Keystone permit, which has become a battleground in the national debate over how to address climate change.
They show how Elliott tried to exploit relationships built in political campaigns, with mixed results. The e-mails are almost all between Elliott and a special assistant to Cheryl Mills, Clinton’s chief of staff. All three knew one another from working on Clinton’s presidential campaign.
Damon Moglen, who directs Friends of the Earth’s climate and energy project, said the e-mails also show a State Department official giving inappropriate “coaching” to TransCanada’s chief executive about how to respond to arguments against the pipeline.
State officials countered that the messages show that TransCanada lobbyists and executives were diverted to officials not directly involved in the pipeline decision. “We don’t want to give anyone an unfair advantage by giving them access to a decision maker,” said Daniel Clune, principal deputy assistant secretary for the Bureau of Oceans, International Environmental and Scientific Affairs.
Environmentalists have urged the administration to block the permit on the grounds that tapping crude from Canada’s oil sands, or tar sands, releases far more greenhouse gases than other forms of oil extraction and could lead to spills in sensitive areas along the pipeline’s route. The project’s backers say it will provide foreign oil from a trusted ally while generating American jobs.
Trying to ease concerns
The e-mails show that Elliott worked assiduously to try to ease administration concerns about the pipeline’s environmental impact.
Much of the correspondence focuses on TransCanada’s dealings with David L. Goldwyn, who was U.S. special envoy on energy before leaving in January to become an energy consultant. Goldwyn did not play a role in the department’s environmental assessment of the project, though if he had stayed on, he would have weighed in on a still-pending review of whether the project is in the U.S. national interest.
In one e-mail dated June 28, 2010, Elliott wrote that he learned from a colleague that his company had “been directed by professionals who work for David Goldwyn to try to provide an assessment of the impact to my organization if the State Department were to withhold approving a presidential permit for a period of up to two (2) years.”
When Mills’s assistant, Nora Toiv, asked Goldwyn about the matter less than an hour later — noting that she and Mills were colleagues with Elliott on Clinton’s presidential campaign — he replied: “The issue is whether they would still produce the oil if we did not permit the pipeline. If so the emissions would be produced anyway. If not then denying the permit forestalls those emissions.”Referring to the environmental impact statement, or EIS, that the State Department was preparing at the time, Goldwyn continued, “That is what they need to address on the record, so it cane [sic] responded to in the EIS and national interest decision.”
In another e-mail more than a month earlier, on May 19, Elliott wrote that TransCanada’s president and chief executive at the time, Hal Kvisle, had a “very productive” meeting with Goldwyn and other State officials.
“David provide [sic] us with insight on what he’d like to see by way of on the record comment during this public comment period of this Keystone KXL draft environmental impact statement,” the lobbyist wrote. “We are working with our stakeholders, shippers and vendors to deliver on the insight David shared with us and to do so by the June 15 deadline.”
In its final environmental impact statement released last month, the department concluded TransCanada would exploit oil sands crude, whether or not the pipeline goes forward.
Goldwyn said in an interview that “I was not part of the process” for the Keystone environmental impact statement.
As a result, Goldwyn said,he “saw anybody and was willing to see anybody who had an interest in this,” including TransCanada’s chief executive, environmental groups and Canadian government officials. “My approach with all of them was to understand their arguments, explain the process and then present the counter-arguments to their arguments,” Goldwyn said.
When TransCanada executives wondered how anyone could oppose the pipeline, Goldwyn said he told them, “The issues that were on the table, which they needed to address on the record and not just with State Department interlocutors, were on the environment.”
“This was technically not in David’s purview,” said former State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley. “David had an interest in it but . . . he was not involved in the decision-making process.”
TransCanada spokesman Terry Cunha said the exchange — along with the other e-mails released by the State Department — simply shows the company’s consistent approach.
“It’s what we’ve always been highlighting for the past three years: energy security, a safe, secure stream of crude oil and job creation,” Cunha said, adding that Elliott sought meetings with senior State officials “to get our message across on the importance of the project” in light of environmentalists’ opposition.
The e-mails show Elliott pressed repeatedly for Mills to meet senior TransCanada officials — a request State rebuffed multiple times. On July 14, 2010 several State Department officials discussed Elliott’s request that Mills meet with TransCanada’s president for energy and oil pipelines, Alex Pourbaix. “Well, conveniently she’ll be out of town,” wrote Jacob Sullivan, who then served as deputy chief of staff and now directs the Office of Policy Planning.
One senior department official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the final permit decision is pending, said of Elliott: “He was a regular requester of meetings. We sometimes met with him, and he was sometimes told the person he was trying to meet with couldn’t meet with him.”At one point, Elliott suggested that his firm could lobby the Canadian government on the administration’s behalf. In an e-mail dated Dec. 6, 2009, Elliott offered to help State officials enlist Canada’s aid in securing a global climate accord during U.N.-brokered talks in Copenhagen.
“TransCanada’s senior executive leadership team would welcome any guidance you might share on background — U.S. government messaging and expectation — specific to developments at the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen,” Elliott wrote to Mills’s assistant. “If there is a message and or topics that the State Department would welcome us to encourage with Canadian government officials, I am happy to pass on that direction to the senior executive leadership team of TransCanada. TransCanada can be an asset for the state department and I hope you might see us as such.”
Cunha denied that Elliott was suggesting the firm could help the administration at international climate negotiations. Instead, Cunha said, Elliott “was trying to understand what impact these policies would have on our natural gas assets.”
Moglen said that Friends of the Earth would pursue additional documents. He said the documents released were numbered, but some numbers were missing. “There are clearly things that are not here,” he said. He also questioned why Elliott did not register as a lobbyist for a foreign company until Dec. 16, 2010 even though he was approaching State officials about the project more than a year earlier. Cunha said Elliott’s activities did not warrant a formal registration until “the last six weeks of 2010.”
Moglen said the June 28 e-mail exchange suggests department officials gave TransCanada special access to what is supposed to be an impartial process.“That is obviously not an independent, probing environmental review process,” Moglen said in an interview. “It’s, in fact, a closed loop.”


15 September 2011

TAR SANDS ACTION; PRES OBAMA HEARS US NOW!!! 15SEP11

UPDATE on Tar Sands Actions nationwide, making sure Pres Obama hears the nation's opposition to the kestone xl pipeline!
Going Nationwide
Friends -

This is the week that Tar Sands Action broke out from its White House beachhead, and went nationwide.

Tar Sands Action rallies have greeted President Obama at every single public appearance he's made since Labor Day weekend - and many more are in the works. The President will likely be making a decision on the Keystone XL pipeline by the end of the year - so we really need to keep up the pressure for the next couple of months.

Rallies led by Tar Sands Action arrestees have greeted President Obama in Richmond, Virginia, Columbus, Ohio and Raleigh, North Carolina. Folks in Boston also led an action on Harvard's campus targeting Obama 2012 campaign manager Jim Messina, and another action is planned tomorrow at an appearance by Vice President Biden in Delaware.

For full coverage, including photos and videos of the protests at Obama events click here: http://www.tarsandsaction.org/tar-sands-action-nationwide/

Protests like these are critical: it's a chance to reach the President directly and the national media who travel with him. If you know of a Presidential event near you, let us know right away by emailing us at tarsandsaction@gmail.com so we can help you put together a Tar Sands Action rally.

But that's not all. Tar Sands Action arrestees have been holding dozens of meetups in their communities to discuss the action in DC, and what's next for the movement. These events are critical for building relationships that will take our movement to the next level. To find an event near you, and to connect with other folks in your community about the Tar Sands Action, click here: http://events.tarsandsaction.org/meetup/

I've been totally overwhelmed by what we've been able to accomplish in just a few short weeks since the action ended. Let's keep this momentum going.

-Duncan

PS - We also had a victory yesterday, thanks to our friends at Bold Nebraska - the University of Nebraska football team cut off its ad contract with TransCanada after some creative organizing. Here's the full story: http://m.journalstar.com/news/local/article_039e8c32-65e9-51ba-8463-34b6de3234bc.html