NORTON META TAG

Showing posts with label Catholic Health Assoc of the U.S.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Catholic Health Assoc of the U.S.. Show all posts

16 February 2012

Obama Didn't Cave on Birth Control 10FEB12

NICK BAUMAN of Mother Jones explains how women still won this battle, thanks to Pres Obama.....
So did Barack Obama fold?
On Friday, after taking heavy criticism from Catholic groups and the political right over a regulation that would have required religiously-affiliated hospitals and universities (not churches) to offer their employees health insurance that covers birth control (with no copays), President Barack Obama went on live television to announce a shift. Now, insurance companies will have to offer employees of religious organizations the birth control coverage directly, without charging extra for it. (The details of the new birth control coverage plan are here.)
Some media outlets will no doubt call this a surrender by the president. But it's not. Here's why:
  • Everyone who was going to get birth control coverage before will still have access to it. Employees of Catholic schools and hospitals aren't always Catholic, and most sexually active women who aren't trying to get pregnant use birth control. The new rule will not allow the religious views of the leadership of religiously-affiliated organizations to dictate whether birth control is provided to their employees. The intent of the first version of the rule was to make birth control easier to get. The new rule will achieve that goal. "No woman's health should depend on who she is, where she works, or how much money she makes," Obama said in his statement. This policy ensures that.
  • The coverage will still feature no copayments. The insurance companies that are being required to offer birth control coverage directly to the employees of religious organizations will have to offer it for free. There will be no difference in cost between the plan that covers birth control and the plan that doesn't. The Obama administration justifies this by noting that studies suggest that covering birth control is cost-neutral or even saves money for health insurers because it's cheaper than pregnancy; it spaces out pregnancies, leading to healthier kids, and has other beneficial health effects.
  • The policy change still won't satisfy the US Conference of Catholic Bishops, which opposed the birth control provision from the start. It's not a cave if your opponents aren't getting what they actually want. What the bishops desire is for the entire birth control rule to be repealed. They believe that no employer—religious affiliation or not—should be required to offer birth control coverage. UPDATE, Friday 3:45 EST: The bishops have released a statement on the policy change that says they're "studying" it and it's a "first step in the right direction." It's unclear whether they'll ultimately retreat from their original position or simply say this attempt is a good step but not sufficient. 
  • The most important reproductive rights groups—Planned Parenthood, NARAL Pro-Choice America, the American Civil Liberties Union, and so on—all support the policy shift. You can bet that these politically savvy groups would be hollering to high heaven if they thought that women had been betrayed.
  • This whole scuffle was an intriguing policy dilemma, pitting women's health advocates versus faith leaders waving the banner of religious freedom. But with this move, Obama has demonstrated that it's possible to sidestep the red-hot politics of the dispute and work out a reasonable policy outcome that's backed by reproductive rights groups and the Catholic Health Association. It's not likely, though, that the social conservatives who have bashed Obama as an implacable foe of religious freedom will give it a rest.

Nick Baumann

News Editor
Nick Baumann covers national politics and civil liberties issues for Mother Jones' DC Bureau. For more of his stories, click here. You can also follow him on Twitter and Facebook. Email tips and insights to nbaumann [at] motherjones [dot] com. RSS |

President Obama Birth Control Compromise Divides Catholic Leaders 15FEB12

THE Catholic Church male hierarchy, bastion of hypocrisy on quality of life and pedophilia, will continue their campaign against the new insurance requirements on birth control, supported only by those faithful who long for the days of inquisition. From HuffPost......
When President Barack Obama first announced the federal rule requiring most faith-based employers to pay for contraception health coverage, most Roman Catholic groups geared for battle. But prominent progressive Catholics broke with Catholic bishops and Republican lawmakers on the issue Wednesday, saying Obama had won them over when he revised the rules to allow faith-based institutions to opt out of providing the coverage.
Stephen Schneck, director of Catholic University of America's Institute for Policy Research and Catholic Studies, stood shoulder to shoulder with university President John Garvey against Obama's initial decision, which would have required Catholic schools to provide contraception coverage with no co-pay to employees against its religious teachings. Schneck told reporters on Wednesday that he "worked as hard as [he] could to get the administration to pay attention" to the concerns of the Catholic bishops and expand the religious exemption.
The revised rule Obama announced Friday, which shifts the cost of contraceptive coverage to insurers when the faith-based employer morally objects, has "by and large resolved" his religious liberty concerns, Schneck said.
"The announcement on Friday creates mechanisms to create even greater distance between Catholic institutions and contraception," Schneck said. "I feel completely satisfied." He said he still has some concerns about self-insured religious groups, but believed the Obama administration would find a fair way to resolve that issue.
Schneck said he was "definitely not" speaking on behalf of his employer, Catholic University. "I've discerned to speak differently than my president in that regard," he said.
His boss, the university president, was a vocal opponent of the initial birth control rule. Garvey signed a letter calling Obama's compromise "a cheap accounting trick" and will testify against it at a congressional hearing on religious liberty on Thursday.
Sister Anne Curtis, a spokeswoman for the 3,800-member religious order Sisters of Mercy of the Americas, also broke with her superiors, the Catholic clergy, on the issue. "We were pleased when adjustments were made in the new requirements that would ensure conscience protections for religious institutions such as ourselves," she said.
The Catholic bishops, traditionally more conservative than nuns on women's health issues, wholly reject the president's accommodation, arguing that self-insured religious employers will still be forced to pay for contraception. They want the mandate rescinded in its entirety, so that even a Catholic person who owns a non-religious business can refuse to cover contraception for his or her employees.
The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, a law firm that protects the interests of religious groups, used the same arguments as Planned Parenthood opponents, saying that "money is fungible." Many religious organizations may still object to paying an insurance company that will provide contraception to its employees for free, even if the employer is not directly paying.
“This is a false ‘compromise’ designed to protect the president’s re-election chances, not to protect the right of conscience,” said Hannah Smith, senior legal counsel for The Becket Fund, in a statement.
Religious conservatives such as Garvey and Bishop William Lori of Bridgeport, Conn., will gather Thursday for a House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing not-so-subtly titled, “Lines Crossed: Separation of Church and State. Has the Obama Administration Trampled on Freedom of Religion and Freedom of Conscience?” Congressional Republicans, including Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), are pushing measures that would repeal the birth control policy entirely on behalf of religious organizations.
Despite the continued beating Obama is taking from a few religious groups, he has won the support of the one Catholic organization that employs more than 750,000 people and is arguably the most heavily affected by the birth control mandate. The Catholic Health Association, the nation's largest group of nonprofit health systems, considered Obama's accommodation a victory.
"We are pleased and grateful that the religious liberty and conscience protection needs of so many ministries that serve our country were appreciated enough that an early resolution of this issue was accomplished," said Sister Carol Keehan, president and CEO of the Catholic Health Association. "This difference has at times been uncomfortable, but it has helped our country sort through an issue that has been important throughout the history of our great democracy."

10 February 2012

Birth control covered... for now & White House compromise still guarantees contraceptive coverage for women 10FEB12

THIS compromise protects a woman's access to free birth control, and that was the objective of Progressives and the Social Justice advocates. If this controversy continues it will only prove that it was not about differing opinions on the separation of Church and State, but was a war on birth control, women's health care, family planning and the Obama administration. From the ACLU and the Washington Post......
Because Freedom Can't Protect Itself


I'm sure you've heard that the Obama administration today announced that it would modify its policy on contraception insurance coverage. The most important thing is that today’s action ensures that every woman who needs coverage for contraception will receive it.

As you know, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) and other groups have vehemently protested the original policy. Tens of thousands of ACLU supporters joined in a national outcry urging President Obama to refuse to yield to false arguments about religious liberty — aimed at undermining access to contraception.

Clearly, our voices were heard — and, once again, we have powerful evidence of the critical importance of stepping forward and speaking up when our fundamental freedoms are put at risk. Thank you.

The new policy will allow religiously affiliated universities, hospitals and social services to opt out of paying for contraceptive coverage and instead have insurance companies directly provide coverage to employees.

Our work is not over, however. The USCCB and other groups will look for new ways to get this policy reversed. And we must be prepared to stand strong against any group who tries to impose one set of religious beliefs on the rest of us. I know we can count on you to stand with us.

Thank you for continued support.

Sincerely,

Louise Melling
Deputy Legal Director, ACLU


© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10004
 WHITE HOUSE COMPROMISE STILL GUARANTEES CONTRACEPTIVE COVERAGE FOR WOMEN

By , Peter Wallsten and N.C. Aizenman

Seeking to allay the concerns of Catholic leaders and head off an escalating political storm, President Obama on Friday announced an adjustment to the administration’s health-care rule requiring religiously affiliated employers to provide contraceptive coverage to women.
Women still will be guaranteed coverage for contraceptive services without any out-of-pocket cost, but will have to seek the coverage directly from their insurance companies if their employers object to birth control on religious grounds.
Religiously-affiliated non-profit employers such as schools, charities, universities, and hospitals will be able to provide their workers with plans that exclude such coverage. However, the insurance companies that provide the plans will have to offer those workers the opportunity to obtain additional contraceptive coverage directly, at no additional charge.
Churches remain exempt from the birth-control coverage requirement. And their workers will not have the option of obtaining separate contraceptive coverage under the new arrangement.
The administration’s decision to make an adjustment reflected the high political stakes of an issue that had generated intense criticism in recent days from a growing chorus of Catholic and Republicans leaders, as well as some Democrats. In Congress and on the campaign trail, leading Republicans attacked the Obama administration’s position as a war on religion.
In an appearance in the White House briefing room, Obama said he instructed aides to craft a solution quickly in the wake of the outcry.
“After many genuine concerns were raised over the last few weeks — and the more cynical desire to make this into political football — it became clear that spending months hammering out a solution was not an option; we had to move this faster,” Obama said, flanked by Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, whose agency is administering the rule.
“I’ve been confident from the start we could work out a sensible approach here,” the president added. “Some folks in Washington may want to treat this as another political wedge issue, but it shouldn’t be. I never saw it that way. It’s people with goodwill on both sides of the debate sorting through a complicated issue to find a solution that works for everyone. Today’s announcement has done that.”
White House officials said Obama called Archbishop Timothy Michael Dolan, Sister Carol Keehan, president of the Catholic health group and a key White House ally in Obama’s health-care overhaul, and Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards to explain the new rules. The officials declined to elaborate on the nature of the conversations.
During a conference call with reporters to explain details, a senior White House official said that the impact of the change on insurers would be cost neutral--and even potentially cost-saving--because on balance it would reduce the need to provide medical coverage related to unwanted pregnancies and other conditions that can be avoided with birth control.
“The new policy ensures women can get contraception without paying a co-pay and addresses important concerns raised by religious groups,” the White House said in a statement.
Progressive groups and Democratic lawmakers quickly applauded the compromise, and the White House noted that two organizations that had disagreed on the issue -- Planned Parenthood, which supported the original rule, and the Catholic Health Association, which opposed it-- released statements praising the new policy.
  Keehan said her organization was “very pleased” with the announcement.
  “This difference has at times been uncomfortable, but it has helped our country sort through an issue that has been important throughout the history of our great democracy,” Keehan’s statement said.
Still, the announcement drew a swift rebuke from some conservative Catholics. Jim Towey, who headed President George W. Bush’s faith-based office and now is president of Ave Maria University, a conservative Catholic school near Naples, Fla., said the university board planned to meet Monday to discuss legal action against the new mandate.
     “We subsidize these health plans, so the question is whether university resources are underwriting this,” Towey said.
      “I still don’t think President Obama gets it,” Towey added. “This is a fig-leaf of a political compromise that’s trying to have it both ways, to mollify women’s groups and so-called centrist Catholics. But I think fundamentally this is not the end of this debate, it’s just the beginning.”
The compromise goes beyond similar accommodations in Hawaii and several other states, because in those states, insurers can charge an extra premium for the contraceptive coverage.
Administration officials did not explain why the compromise was not incorporated earlier, despite the fact that it had been widely discussed as early as last fall.
“This is a tough issue,” an administration official said. But, the official added, “I think what we’re doing today is a very, very common-sense, responsible way forward.”
That policy proposed last summer and confirmed last month as part of Obama’s health-care overhaul law required employers to provide female employees the full range of contraceptive coverage, including birth control, the “morning-after pill” and sterilization services.
The measure exempted churches but covered religiously affiliated schools, charities, colleges and hospitals, meaning that many Catholic-run institutions would have had to offer insurance plans that church leaders say violate their teachings.
Catholic bishops led a firestorm of opposition to the rule, distributing letters and other materials to be shared with millions of worshipers.
Republicans, and some Democrats, seized on the issue, with GOP presidential candidates accusing Obama of waging a war against religion. Republican lawmakers threatened to pass a law invalidating the White House ruling unless the White House relented.
In a speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington on Friday morning, White House hopeful Rick Santorum called the controversy an example of the Obama administration overstepping its authority in people’s private lives.
“It’s not about contraception,” Santorum said, calling birth control costs “minor expenses.” “It’s about government control of your lives.” 
Former Mike Huckabee, a former Arkansas governor, told the group the issue should be a rallying cry for all conservatives, even though opposition to the rule was championed by Catholics.
“We are all Catholics now,” said Huckabee, who was raised a Southern Baptist. Noted that he had never expected to make such a statement, he added: “Praise the Lord and pass the offering plate. It’s time to get serious.”
The controversy also exposed divisions among Democrats, with several stepping forward in recent days to criticize Obama’s handling of the issue. Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W. Va.), who co-sponsored legislation to reverse the rule, called the measure “un-American” in a letter to Obama last week. Former Virginia Gov. Timothy M. Kaine, one of Obama’s closest political allies, said Obama must find a middle path.
At the same time, White House officials say they came under intense pressure from women’s groups and many Democratic lawmakers to stand firm on the underlying principle of the rule -- that women should have full access to contraception.
It was not immediately clear whether Friday’s announcement would satisfy the rule’s most ardent critics.
In addition to Hawaii, three other states--Missouri, New York, and West Virginia--also require insurers to provide workers birth-control “riders,” according to an analysis by the Guttmacher Institute, a non-profit research organization specializing in women’s reproductive health.

16 November 2010

Friends Of Health Overhaul Defend It In Federal Court Case 16NOV10

In case you missed it, Friday was the last day for people with something to say about the new federal health law to file briefs in the huge multistate lawsuit in Florida challenging its constitutionality.
Since so many winning Republicans ran on, among other things, opposition to the law, it's not a huge shock that many of those so-called amicus filings came from prominent GOPers seeking to add their two cents to the charge that the law exceeded Congress' authority.
By Friday afternoon, Judge Roger Vinson in U.S. District Court in Pensacola, Fla., had approved the filing of amicus briefs by soon-to-be House Speaker John Boehner, a group of GOP Senators led by Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, and outgoing GOP Govs. Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota and Donald Carcieri of Rhode Island, among others.
But far less attention has been paid to those who are filing briefs in support of the law. We waded through them, and here are some you might find worth a look.
  First up, a group of 35 economists, including three Nobel laureates, who say they have an interest in "assisting the Court in its understanding of the underlying economics that are at the heart of the minimum coverage provisions" of the law.
How do they want to help? Well, the economists want to make sure Judge Vinson understands that, despite the claims of the law's opponents that requiring individuals to carry health insurance could lead to unprecedented federal intrusion in people's lives, "the unique economics of health care distinguish it from virtually every other business and demonstrate that upholding the constitutionality of that provision will not serve as a basis for unlimited expansion of the federal government’s powers."
Also set to file a brief in favor of the mandate is a collection of hospital groups that includes the American Hospital Association, Federation of American Hospitals, National Association of Public Hospitals and Health Systems, National Association of Children's Hospitals and the Catholic Health Association of the U.S.
The hospitals argue they'll be able to inform the judge that the uninsured do consume health care. And one guess where. Yes, often from these groups' facilities, and often without being able to pay for it.
Their brief will explain:
[H]ow the decision made by some uninsured Americans to delay or forgo routine preventive care actually increases the amount, and the cost, of the care they need when an avoidable illness eventually brings them to the hospital.
The next hearing in the case is set for Dec. 16.