From left: Frank Gaffney; Ginni Thomas; Allen West
Believing
they are losing the messaging war with progressives, a group of
prominent conservatives in Washington—including the wife of Supreme
Court Justice Clarence Thomas and journalists from
Breitbart News and the
Washington Examiner—has
been meeting privately since early this year to concoct talking points,
coordinate messaging, and hatch plans for "a 30 front war seeking to
fundamentally transform the nation," according to documents obtained by
Mother Jones.
Dubbed Groundswell, this coalition convenes weekly in the offices of
Judicial Watch, the conservative legal watchdog group. During these
hush-hush sessions and through a Google group, the members of
Groundswell—including aides to congressional Republicans—cook up battle
plans for their ongoing fights against the Obama administration,
congressional Democrats, progressive outfits,
and the
Republican establishment and "clueless" GOP congressional leaders. They
devise strategies for killing immigration reform, hyping the Benghazi
controversy, and countering the impression that the GOP exploits racism.
And the Groundswell gang is mounting a behind-the-scenes organized
effort to eradicate the outsize influence of GOP über-strategist/pundit
Karl Rove within Republican and conservative ranks. (For more on
Groundswell's "two front war" against Rove—a major clash on the
right—click
here.)
One of the influential conservatives guiding the group is Virginia "Ginni" Thomas, a columnist for the
Daily Caller
and a tea party consultant and lobbyist. Other Groundswell members
include John Bolton, the former UN ambassador; Frank Gaffney, the
president of the Center for Security Policy; Ken Blackwell and Jerry
Boykin of the Family Research Council; Tom Fitton, the president of
Judicial Watch; Gayle Trotter, a fellow at the Independent Women's
Forum; Catherine Engelbrecht and Anita MonCrief of True the Vote; Allen
West, the former GOP House member; Sue Myrick, also a former House
GOPer; Diana Banister of the influential
Shirley and Banister PR firm; and Max Pappas, a top aide to Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas).
Among the conveners listed in an invitation to a May 8 meeting of
Groundswell were Stephen Bannon, executive chairman of Breitbart News
Network; Dan Bongino, a former Secret Service agent who resoundingly
lost a Maryland Senate race last year (and is now running for a House
seat); Leonard Leo, executive vice president of the Federalist Society;
Sandy Rios, a Fox News contributor; Lori Roman, a former executive
director of the American Legislative Exchange Council; and Austin Ruse,
the head of the Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute. Conservative
journalists and commentators participating in Groundswell have included
Breitbart News reporters Matthew Boyle and Mike Flynn,
Washington Examiner executive editor Mark Tapscott, and
National Review contributor Michael James Barton.
Groundswell has collaborated with conservative GOPers on Capitol
Hill, including Sens. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) and Cruz and Rep. Jim
Bridenstine (R-Okla.), a leading tea partier. At its weekly meetings,
the group aims to strengthen the right's messaging by crafting Twitter
hashtags; plotting strategy on in-the-headlines issues such as voter ID,
immigration reform, and the sequester; promoting politically useful
scandals; and developing "action items."
A certain amount of secrecy cloaks Groundswell's efforts. Though members have been encouraged to
zap out tweets with a #GSW hashtag,
a message circulated to members of its Google group noted that the role
of certain advocates should be kept "off of the Google group for OPSEC
[operational security] reasons." This "will avoid any potential for bad
press for someone if a communication item is leaked," the message
explained. (The Groundswell documents were provided to
Mother Jones by a source who had access to its Google group page and who has asked not to be identified.)
"We want to protect the strategic
collaboration occurring at Groundswell and build on it. Please be
careful about bringing guests and clear them ahead of time."
Washington is full of coalitions that meet to coordinate messaging and strategy. For two decades, conservative strategist
Grover Norquist,
who heads Americans for Tax Reform, has held his now-famous Wednesday
morning meetings for a broad spectrum of Republicans, including
conservatives opposed to gay rights and abortion rights and those who
favor them, as well as GOPers on different sides of the immigration
reform debate. Groundswell, which meets at the same time as Norquist's
group, appears to be a more ideologically pure version of the Norquist
confab, and its emergence—given the prominent role of Ginni Thomas and
the participation of journalists—prompts several intriguing questions.
Critics have
contended
that Thomas' work as a lobbyist opposing Obamacare posed a conflict of
interest for her husband, who would rule on the constitutionality of the
health care reform initiative. (Clarence Thomas joined the Supreme
Court minority that favored striking down the law.) And Common Cause has
maintained that Justice Thomas had a conflict of interest when he participated in the
Citizens United
case because his wife at the time was running a conservative nonprofit
fighting the "tyranny" of President Barack Obama that would benefit from
removing limits on such groups' spending and fundraising. With her
involvement in Groundswell—which zeroes in on contentious issues that
come before the high court, including voting rights, abortion, and gay
marriage—Ginni Thomas continues to be intricately associated with
matters on which her husband may have to render a decision. Ginni Thomas
did not respond to requests for comment.
The
participation of journalists in coordinating messaging with ideological
advocates and political partisans raises another set of issues.
Conservatives expressed outrage when news broke in 2009 about
Journolist, a private email list where several hundred
progressive-minded reporters, commentators, and academics exchanged
ideas and sometimes bickered. (I was on Journolist,
mainly as a lurker.) The late Andrew Breitbart once
offered $100,000
for the full Journolist archives and denounced it as "the epitome of
progressive and liberal collusion that conservatives, Tea Partiers,
moderates and many independents have long suspected and feared exists at
the heart of contemporary American political journalism." The
Groundswell documents show conservative journalists, including several
with
Breitbart News, colluding on high-level messaging with leading partisans of the conservative movement.
How Groundswellers Win "Brownie Points"
Notes prepared after a Groundswell meeting held on March 27
detailed the group's mission and origins:
Groundswell evolved out of conversations among conservative leaders
after the November elections. This is the eighth meeting. Now others are
asking to be included. Growth needs to be strategic; it should be made
up of senior level people willing to collaborate. It is important to
keep a balance of social conservatives, national security conservatives,
and constitutional conservatives. Outreach has occurred to incorporate
groups with extensive reach: Heritage, Heritage Action, FreedomWorks,
AFP [Americans for Prosperity], FRC [Family Research Council] and the
NRA, among others…Our country is in peril. This is a critical moment
needing critical leadership. We want to protect the strategic
collaboration occurring at Groundswell and build on it. Please be
careful about bringing guests and clear them ahead of time.
The memo declared that the goal was not to merely ponder, but to be proactive:
What Groundswell is not is a room of note takers. The goal of
Groundswell is to sync messages and develop action from reports and
information exchanged. Going forward there should be an action item
accompanying each report.
At
the March 27 meeting,
Groundswell participants discussed one multipurpose theme they had been
deploying for weeks to bash the president on a variety of fronts,
including immigration reform and the sequester: Obama places "politics
over public safety." In a display of Groundswell's message-syncing,
members of the group repeatedly flogged this phrase in public. Frank
Gaffney penned a
Washington Times op-ed titled "Putting Politics Over Public Safety." Tom Fitton headlined a Judicial Watch
weekly update
"Politics over Public Safety: More Illegal Alien Criminals Released by
Obama Administration." Peter List, editor of LaborUnionReport.com,
authored a
RedState.com post called "Obama's Machiavellian Sequestration Pain Game: Putting Politics Over Public Safety." Matthew Boyle
used the phrase in an immigration-related article for
Breitbart. And Dan Bongino promoted Boyle's story on Twitter by
tweeting,
"Politics over public safety?" In a message to Groundswellers, Ginni
Thomas awarded "brownie points" to Fitton, Gaffney, and other members
for promoting the "politics over public safety" riff.
"If we lose on immigration, we lose on every other issue. They key to defeating this bill is Sen. Rubio."
There was much more on the agenda for
the March 27 meeting
than a single talking point. The group routinely addresses an ambitious
to-do list for its campaign against the left. At that session,
Groundswellers discussed several immigration-related "action items."
These included attempting to link the pending reform bill to Obamacare
and collecting health care reform horror stories to provide to Cruz, a
leading opponent of the Senate immigration reform bill. (Cruz has
repeatedly
compared the legislation to the health care reform law.)
Groundswell members saw immigration as a life-or-death issue. "If we
lose on immigration," the post-meeting memo noted, "we lose on every
other issue. The key to defeating this bill is Sen. Rubio. He can
gracefully remove himself from the 'gang of 8' and still save face…The
messaging on this issue has to be 'we can't trust Obama' to enforce
immigration laws after the amnesty."
The group also reviewed how best to oppose the confirmation of
Tom Perez,
Obama's nominee for labor secretary. Groundswellers claimed that Perez,
then a senior Justice Department official, supported "Muslim
Brotherhood organizations and Shariah." (One Groundswell memo maintained
that Perez "is extremely antagonistic toward whites.") A third agenda
item that Wednesday morning was beating back the effort to end the Boy
Scouts of America's ban on gay Scouts. And there was yet another issue
for the Groundswell members to stoke: "John Kerry has family ties to
Iran that opens the doors to blackmail and other national security
risks. Kerry's son in law is an Iranian American with extensive family
still in Iran." The post-meeting memo suggested Twitter hashtags to
push: #CantTrustObama, #PoliticsOverPublicSafety, #SequesterLies.
"We're Failing the Propaganda Battle"
The Groundswellers feel that they too often lose the political
narrative to their progressive rivals. One memo that circulated among
members declared, "We must reclaim the language and put 'a face' on our
messages; tell stories. Write articles on 4th grade level!"
A Groundswell memo noted, "Terms like,
'GOP,' 'Tea Party,' 'Conservative' communicate 'racism.'" They proposed
an alternative: "Fredrick Douglas Republican."
Notes from
a February 28 Groundswell gathering
reflected both their collective sense of pessimism and desire for
aggressive tactics: "We are failing the propaganda battle with
minorities. Terms like, 'GOP,' 'Tea Party,' 'Conservative' communicate
'racism.'" The Groundswellers proposed an alternative: "Fredrick Douglas
Republican," a phrase, the memo noted, that "changes minds." (His name
is actually spelled "Frederick Douglass.") The meeting notes also stated
that an "active radical left is dedicated to destroy [sic] those who
oppose them" with "vicious and unprecedented tactics. We are in a real
war; most conservatives are not prepared to fight."
The
notes from the March 20 meeting
summed up Groundswell griping: "Conservatives are so busy dealing with
issues like immigration, gay marriage and boy scouts there is little
time left to focus on other issues. These are the very issues the Left
wants to avoid but we need to magnify. R's cannot beat Obama at his own
game but need to go on the offense and define the issues." The group's
proposed offensive would include hyping the
Fast and Furious
gun-trafficking controversy, slamming Obama's record, and touting
Benghazi as a full-fledged scandal. "The problem," the memo noted, "is
Speaker Boehner and [Rep.] Mike Rogers (Intelligence Community) are
refusing to deal" with the Benghazi issue. It added, "Leaders can and
should be shamed into doing the right thing."
Another problem for right-wingers, this memo pointed out, was that
though "a group of freshmen and sophomore representatives in
Congress…are willing and ready to stand up" for conservative causes, "no
one is willing to step up and become that leader." Reflecting the dim
view held by Groundswell members of House GOPers, the memo maintained
that too many Republican lawmakers were co-opted by power and reluctant
to challenge House Republican leaders: "The Speaker holds the control in
the House. He controls committees, chairmanships, meeting rooms, etc.
Conservatives sell out rationalizing their compromises will position
them to advance their agenda through committee work. In reality they are
being bought." Boehner, according to his memo, was too frightened to
confront Obama head-on regarding budget issues because he "believes that
Newt lost his speakership due to the government shutdown."
Venting about weak and squishy GOP leaders was a regular feature of Groundswell gatherings.
One action item put it bluntly:
GAP of REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP: how do we tell them they are failing
their base; will lose in 2014 unless they fight for principles (as
opposed to show disdain for them and accommodate Obama; O is dividing Rs
and they seem clueless: IDEAS NEEDED!
A week later, Newt Gingrich
was scheduled to address the group on the "lack of Republican Leadership right now, and Rove." For 10 minutes.
At the March 27 meeting, Groundswellers once more voiced their anger
with the GOP establishment and Rove—ideological sellouts, they believed,
who undercut conservative candidates in order to back Republicans
deemed more electable. They discussed the efforts among conservatives to
respond to the Republican Party's recently released
autopsy (PDF) of the 2012 elections, which called on the party to be more inclusive of minorities and less severe on social issues.
Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus, the
post-meeting memo huffed, "is sending messages to the party…If we were
all gay illegal aliens, the party likes us. He is preparing the way for a
change on social issues by giving a warning, 'don't go Old Testament'
and advising the party to consider what Rove said about the next
nominees could speak favorably of homosexual marriage in the campaign."
The memo summed up Groundswell's preferred solution to GOP woes:
"embrace the libertarian and conservative wing of the party."
"I'm Going to Need Help Pushing Back"
Shortly after its creation, Groundswell started bolstering interactions
between right-wing advocates and conservative members of the Senate and
the House. On March 5, Gaston Mooney, a staffer for the Senate
Republican Steering Committee,
posted a message
to Groundswell's Google group asking for questions that could be posed
to Gina McCarthy, Obama's nominee to lead the EPA, during confirmation
hearings or in meetings between her and individual senators. (She was
confirmed as EPA chief this month.)
"If we were all gay illegal aliens, the
party likes us. [RNC chair Reince Priebus] is preparing the way for a
change on social issues by giving a warning, 'don't go Old Testament.'"
At
an April 3 meeting,
Groundswell members were encouraged to send Paul Teller, executive
director of the Republican Study Committee, the caucus of House
conservatives, "feasible asks in exchange for raised debt ceiling." The
post-meeting memo noted, "House conservatives want clear consensus on
what the conservative grassroots want to see negotiated." Here was a
chance for Groundswellers to shape the next debt ceiling showdown.
In Groundswell's first months, one of the most active members in its
Google group was Danielle Cutrona, chief counsel to Alabama Sen. Jeff
Sessions. She frequently placed information—speeches, articles, press
releases—on Groundswell's Google group. In February, she
posted opposition research material
regarding a judicial appointment and asked members to distribute it:
"Any help is much appreciated." In another message to Groundswell, she
requested assistance in opposing the pro-immigration reform GOP
establishment.
"I'm going to need help pushing back," she wrote.
On
one occasion, Cutrona
promoted a column from the conservative site
RedState.com. Headlined "Who is Going to Put an End to the McCain/Graham Circus?" this
RedState.com
post excoriated Republican Sens. John McCain and Lindsey Graham as
"Benedict Arnolds" for retreating on their opposition to Chuck Hagel's
nomination as defense secretary and for "their treachery on the issue of
illegal immigration." Cutrona, who occasionally used her official
Senate email to communicate with Groundswell members, was encouraging
this band of conservatives to spread the word that two party colleagues
of her boss were ideological traitors. A spokesman for Sessions says
that this blog post did not reflect Cutrona's views and "was simply one
of scores of diverse news and opinion pieces she emailed on
immigration."
"Even If the Idea Isn't Perfect, I Can Help Massage It"
Several conservative journalists have enthusiastically participated in
Groundswell's deliberations. In March, Mark Tapscott, the executive
editor of the conservative
Washington Examiner, sent his most recent
column to group members.
It focused on a theme that Groundswellers had resolved to hype:
President Obama is a divider. And after a meeting that month, Tapscott
wrote to the group,
"Enjoyed hearing from all of you who spoke earlier today. It's amazing
how much we are accomplishing on so many fronts." But Tapscott tells
Mother Jones
that after attending one or two meetings at the invitation of Ginni
Thomas, he decided to stop participating: "The implication of attending
is that you're participating in their planning, and, as a journalist, I
don't think that's appropriate. Other journalists may think
differently."
At another Groundswell gathering,
according to the minutes, the members decided to ask
Breitbart's
Stephen Bannon to arrange for his media organization "to get senators
on the record regarding their support [or non-support]" of the
filibuster that GOP Sens. Mike Lee, Rand Paul, and Ted Cruz were
threatening to mount against the gun control bill. This suggested
that the Groundswellers thought they could task
Breitbart News to pursue a story that would be strategically useful for the group. (
Breitbart News was already covering the possible filibuster.)
"It's amazing how much we are accomplishing on so many fronts," the Washington Examiner's Mark Tapscott wrote to fellow Groundswell members.
Groundswell has forged a particularly close relationship with
Breitbart. Matthew Boyle, one of
Breitbart's
more prominent reporters, has attended Groundswell meetings, used the
group as a source for tips and a mechanism to promote his stories, and
joined in its efforts to whip up coordinated bullet points to be
deployed by conservative advocacy shops. In February,
he tried to enlist the group to push a
story he had written the year before at the
Daily Caller,
in which he maintained the Justice Department was in cahoots with the
liberal group Media Matters to smear conservative whistleblowers and
journalists. In a long note addressed to all Groundswellers—written at a
time when reporter Bob Woodward was making (what turned out to be
inflated) claims about the Obama White House intimidating foes—Boyle
said, "Figured this might be a good time to bring this story back up and
see if there's a way to drive it."
Boyle said he was hoping to prompt congressional Republicans to
launch an investigation. He contended he had only revealed the "tip of
the iceberg" and shared his suspicion that many government agencies
(State, the CIA, the Pentagon, the EPA, and more) were conspiring with
"far left wing groups" to undermine conservatives in the media: "I think
we can get at the heart of the Obama admin's weaknesses here." He
explained: "Any evidence obtained would be more proof of collusion
between the administration and the media and far left groups, while at
the same time serving as evidence of whatever ridiculously moronic big
government policies they're pushing are."
The following month, Boyle
sent a message to Groundswell members
seeking tips and offering to help shape stories Groundswellers wanted
to disseminate: "I'm saying we can get pieces out fast on Breitbart.
Whenever you have an idea, email or call me with a pitch and I'll do my
best to get the story out there. Keep us on offense, them on defense.
Even if the idea isn't perfect, I can help massage it to get there."
A high-priority cause for Groundswellers is voter identification
efforts—what progressives would call voter suppression—and when
Groundswellers developed a thread on their Google group page exploring
the best way to pitch the right's voter identification endeavors as a
major voting rights case was pending in the Supreme Court, the
coalition's friendly journalists joined right in. Dan Bongino, the
ex-Secret Service agent and 2012 Senate candidate,
kicked off the discussion:
"We need to reframe this. This narrative of the Left has already taken
hold in MD. The words 'Voter ID' are already lost & equated with
racism. Maybe a 'free and fair elections initiative' with a heavy
emphasis on avoiding ANY voter disenfranchisement combined with an
identification requirement which includes a broader range of documents."
Sheryl Kaufman, communications director for
Rep. Jim Bridenstine, chimed in: "'OBAMAGRATION'—I love it!!
Communicates the similarity with Obamacare."
In response, Tapscott suggested, "How about 'Election Integrity'?"
And Gaffney weighed in: "I like it." Fitton noted that Judicial Watch
had an "Election Integrity Project." Boyle proposed, "Fair and equal
elections," explaining, "Terms 'fair' and 'equal' connect with most
people. It's why the left uses them." Then came True the Vote's Anita
MonCrief: "We do a lot under the Election Integrity Banner. Does not
resonate with the people. Voter Rights may be better. We really have
been trying to get the messaging right."
Minutes later,
Breitbart's Mike Flynn
tried to change the conversation,
noting that Boyle earlier in the week had reported that Obama's
daughters had been vacationing in the Bahamas while the White House had
suspended tours due to the sequester. "The Obama White House has never
been so exposed to public criticism as they are right now, because of
their decision to cancel WH tours," Flynn wrote. "Everything should be
focused on that front." He declared, "We have to be willing to march to
the sound of the guns." (Earlier in the week, Boyle had posted his story
on the Obama daughters on Groundswell's Google group page, noting, "I
think this fits in nicely with that politics over public safety
theme…Enjoy.") Ignoring Flynn's missive, Engelbrecht, the president of
True the Vote, wrote, "We bill ourselves as an Election Integrity
Initiative and have found it strikes the right tone."
In a response to a request for comment regarding his participation in
Groundswell's message-making, Flynn emailed, "We have reporters
covering lots of meetings in DC, as I'm sure you do as well. As you
know, it provides critical background to know what's happening on the
Hill." In a subsequent email, Flynn insisted, "[N]either Boyle nor I
have spent 1 minute on any messaging. We haven't spent any time creating
talking points." Flynn added, "[W]e are journalists with a point of
view. We are open about that. We attend meetings of conservatives. Where
we are allowed, we attend meetings of leftist activists." Boyle did not
respond to requests for comment.
"We All Lament the Difficulty We Have Persuading Americans"
In between the weekly meetings, Groundswellers keep on scheming,
frequently using their Google group to share ideas and need-to-know
information. The material is often routine: a
John Bolton op-ed, a
press release opposing the nomination of the EPA administrator, a
call to rally support
for a Rand Paul filibuster. Often the material reveals the group's
ideological excesses, such as a PowerPoint supposedly proving that John
Brennan, the Obama national security adviser who has become CIA chief,
is soft on radical Islam. In one post, Ginni Thomas encouraged
Groundswell members to watch
Agenda: Grinding America Down, a
documentary that
claims that progressives (including Obama) seek "a brave new world"
based on the "failed policies and ideologies of communism" and that an
evil left is purposefully "destroying the greatest country in all of
world history." MonCrief posted an email noting that the bombs that
exploded at the Boston Marathon were "similar to Bill Ayers' Weather
Underground nail bomb."
But Groundswellers constantly brainstorm via their Google group in
search of a magic talking point, or a silver bullet of messaging. On
April 24, Keli Carender, the national grassroots coordinator of Tea
Party Patriots, posted a message to the Google group, writing, "We
should have a unified name for the immigration bill so that as the other
side is calling it 'reform,' we present a unified front against that
notion. If we're all calling it different things, their 'reform' message
will win. We only combat the idea that it is reform if we hammer back
with one different phrase/name." She tossed out a few ideas:
"Schumer-Rubio bill," "anti-security bill," and "amnesty bill." Sheryl
Kaufman, the communications director for Rep. Jim Bridenstine, chimed in
that she was fond of a phrase derived by MonCreif: "'OBAMAGRATION'—I
love it!! Communicates the similarity with Obamacare."
When Campaign for America's Future, a progressive group, sent out an
email regarding the sequester headlined "Don't let Republicans destroy
the economy," Carender sent a message to Groundswell members via the
Google group: "What about a 'stick with sequester' (or similar) mantra
from our side?" Responding to Carender's note, Peter List of
LaborUnionReport.com wrote, "Most Americans don't understand sequesters.
We need to be more clever than the Left on this…Something amusing and
easy for LIVs [low-information voters] to understand. Maybe a tie in to
Humpty Dumpty (the economy) and all King Obama's men ('tax increases')
not being able to put Humpty Dumpty back together again. (I'm open to
anything…and just made that up.)"
At another point, List emailed Ginni Thomas
an idea for an anti-Obama ad that he thought could go viral:
A 15 sec internet [YouTube ad] featuring ethnically diverse children on a merry-go-round [soft music]…
Nuclear explosion.
Two bullet points on the facts.
Call to action:
Tell President Obama & Congress not to cut our nation's defense.
Thomas posted the note for all in Groundswell to see. "Brilliant idea," she commented. "…Taker?"
Several months after Groundswell kicked off, Steven Sutton, vice
president of development for the conservative Leadership Institute and a
former chief of staff to several House GOPers, proposed a "strategic
message development project" for the outfit. "What is needed,"
he wrote,
"is an umbrella thematic message under which each specific issue can be
magnified and maximized. For those familiar with it, this is an
extension and development of the
Leesburg Grid (which the Left has co-opted and now uses extensively, and the Right has ignored and allowed to fall into disuse.)"
Sutton suggested using four main themes: Obama and liberal policies
fail; Obama and liberal policies make things worse; there is a lack of
leadership in the White House; and Obama "puts politics ahead of
people/our country/America." These themes, he contended, "are best used
sequentially, rather than randomly/haphazardly/isolated…The most
important thing is to think thematically and drive these messages."
Sutton went on:
Issues matter. Details matter. Substance matters. But theme matters
more. Substance matters only as it helps to reinforce the themes.
We all lament the difficulty we have persuading Americans. After
all, we have the facts, figures, and data to prove our points. Why can't
we persuade? There are many tactics we can use to help persuade
(telling stories, finding victims, tempering tone). But these tactics
pale in comparison to the importance of providing a context…a theme…to
help people organize their thoughts and opinions.
Groundswell has set itself up as the theme lab for the true-red
activists of the conservative movement. Fearing that some hydra of the
left has long been running wild, vanquishing the right, and bringing the
nation closer to utter ruin, the members of Groundswell have birthed a
hydra of their own.
Additional reporting by Kate Sheppard.
Image credit: D.C Hughes/LNI/ZUMA Press; Rex Curry/ZUMA Press;
Gage Skidmore/Flickr
David Corn
Washington Bureau ChiefDavid Corn is
Mother Jones' Washington bureau chief. For more of his stories,
click here. He's also on
Twitter and
Facebook.
If You Liked This, You Might Also Like...
A group of lion hunters in South Africa were apparently stalking the wrong lion:
Police officers examine a damaged
pickup outside the United States consulate in Karachi, Pakistan, on June
14, 2002. A suicide attacker crashed a bomb-laden car into a guard
post, killing at least seven and leaving at least 25 others injured.
