NORTON META TAG

Showing posts with label 6JAN21 insurrection. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 6JAN21 insurrection. Show all posts

31 May 2026

“Totally unacceptable”: Pence calls slush fund for Jan. 6 rioters “deeply offensive”



 mike pence is as responsible for the 6JAN21 insurrection as NOT MY pres drumpf / trump because he decided to continue on as drumpf's / trump's vp after the pussy grabbing expose and because during drumpf's / trump's first term he did nothing to stop the administration's attacks on our democratic Republic or to stop the hate, bigotry, racism, violence, misogyny, lies, deception, manipulation and "christian" nationalism. He can run his mouth all he wants about the neo-nazi fascist corrupt drumpf / trump-vance administration and the gop / greed over people-republican party now, that is his right, but I do not believe he is offended by drumpf's / trump's $1,776 billion slush fund because his compliance as vp is a big reason why we are in the state we are in now. mike pence owes America an apology for drumpf's / trump's first term. If there was a chance he could get a few million from the fund pence would have never said what he did on 'Face The Nation'. From Salon.....

“Totally unacceptable”: Pence calls slush fund for Jan. 6 rioters “deeply offensive”


The former vice president was inside the Capitol when it was stormed by Trump supporters


Nights and Weekends Editor

Published 

Former Vice President Mike Pence thinks Donald Trump should “drop” his designs on slush fund created in the president’s recent settlement with the IRS, calling the idea of compensating Jan. 6 rioters “deeply offensive.”

Pence shared his take on the Anti-Weaponization Fund during a visit with CBS‘s “Face the Nation” on Sunday. The nearly $1.8 billion fund would compensate people who feel they’ve been unfairly targeted by the Department of Justice. Pence, who was in the U.S. Capitol building as Trump’s supporters stormed it, felt that payouts for pardoned conspiracists was a bridge too far.

“I’ll never minimize what happened on January 6. I’ll always believe, by God’s grace, we did our duty that day… the peaceful transfer of power under the Constitution,” he said. “This talk of a weaponization fund, the idea of creating a fund that could compensate people that assaulted police officers and vandalized the Capitol that day is totally unacceptable. My hope is the administration will drop it. Drop the idea entirely.”

Pence and Trump have traded barbs publicly since the chaotic end of the president’s first term. The one-time governor of Indiana has objected to cranks in Trump’s Cabinet and his aborted tariff scheme. Trump, for his part, has repeatedly called Pence weak for refusing to nullify the 2020 election. Trump reportedly warned Pence ahead of the certification that he would “go down as a wimp” if he didn’t overturn the results. Per reports from ex-special counsel Jack Smith, Trump then shrugged off threats to the VP’s life on Jan. 6.

Speaking to NBC‘s “Meet the Press” on Sunday, Pence called on Trump to “get rid of this fund.”

I mean, it’s deeply offensive to me that you could have a fund that could even possibly compensate people who assaulted police officers or vandalized the Capitol on January 6th. And I think that’s broadly held by most Republicans and most Americans.”

By Alex Galbraith

Alex Galbraith is Salon's nights and weekends editor, and author of our free daily newsletter, Crash Course. He is based in New Orleans.

06 March 2026

Bill to require factual teaching about U.S. Capitol attack clears Va. General Assembly 4MAR26

 


JUST as states have had to respond to NOT MY pres drumpf's / trump's illegal and immoral directive to gop / guardians of pedophiles & predators-republican party controlled states to redistrict their congressional precincts to minimize their losses in the 2026 Midterms so too they have had to respond to the corrupt drumpf / trump-vance administration's and the gop / greed over people-republican party's pressure to teach the 6 JAN 21 insurrection not as a treasonous violent assault on the US Capital Building and an attempt to nullify the 2020 Presidential election results  but to teach it as a peaceful protest against a stolen election. This from the Virginia Mercury shows the people of Virginia and our Commonwealth legislature will not teach the Orwellian version drumpf / trump-vance and their sycophants want but will teach the truth. Why does the Virginia assembly of independent baptist object to teaching the truth? Just waiting for Gov Spanberger D-VA to sign it into law.....

Bill to require factual teaching about US Capitol attack clears Va. General Assembly

Proposal passed on mostly party line votes in House, Senate; heads to governor

By:-March 4, 20265:26 am

Virginia lawmakers on Monday passed a proposal that would require schools, if they teach students about the violent attack on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, to relay the facts of what actually happened, without including misinformation that the 2020 presidential election was stolen or that the attack was just a peaceful protest. 

Since both the Senate and House advanced the measure, if Gov. Abigail Spanberger approves, it would take effect immediately and would dictate what and how Virginia’s public schools can instruct pupils regarding the Capitol attack, a major political event in the country’s recent history.

The attack, waged by supporters of then-Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump in response to Congress certifying that Joe Biden won the election, had wide-ranging impacts on law enforcement, public discourse about democracy, and ongoing institutional, legal, and social repercussions.

“There is real concern that the President of the United States is trying to rewrite the history of January 6, (that is) borne out by the fact there’s a whitehouse.gov site that presents a false history of what happened that day,” House Bill 333 sponsor Del. Dan Helmer, D-Fairfax, said to the Mercury earlier during the session.

“We just want to make sure that if school boards choose to teach on January 6, that they’re not presenting the false narrative that is out there.”

Permissive and political

Helmer’s bill does not ban schools from teaching about Jan. 6. Instead, it requires a specific framing and bars presenting alternative interpretations or election fraud claims as credible in public schools.

Despite the seeming consensus in the legislature, the bill drew some opposition from the public.. The Virginia Assembly of Independent Baptists argued that it lacked educational value and pushed a “left-wing” narrative.

“I don’t know that I agree that it is necessary to take one of the darkest days in American history and teach our young people and glorify to our young people when adults act badly,” said Michael Huffman, the assembly’s executive director, during a Senate subcommittee meeting on Feb. 19. “True education equips children for life, not political agendas, and glorifying or mandating … the dark day serves only short-sighted partisanship, not our kids’ future.”

Sheila Fury, another speaker who opposed the legislation, called it another “reason why everyone in the commonwealth should pull their children from public education” during a Jan. 27 House Education subcommittee hearing.

“This is explicit indoctrination,” Fury said.

Helmer, in response, emphasized the need to teach the truth about the event and counter widespread false narratives about it. Some lawmakers, including Senate Education and Health Committee Chair Sen. Barbara Favola, D-Arlington, pointed out that the proposal is permissive.

“I don’t see anything wrong with this bill,” Favola said. “I think the January 6 episode, unfortunately, is something that our children should be aware of, and I think the framework is reasonable.”

In the House, Del. Jessica Anderson, D-Williamsburg, supported the legislation. 

“Our courts have proven that it was an insurrection, and I want to make sure that our students are also taught those facts,” Anderson said during a Jan. 27 House Education subcommittee hearing.

The Senate and House supported the legislation on mostly party-line votes.

Next step

Spanberger will decide whether to sign the proposal into law. Her position on it is currently unclear and her office did not respond to questions about whether she will support the measure.

Before her election as governor, Spanberger represented Virginia in Congress during the attack. She called for investigations and measures to prevent similar attacks in the future.

She wrote, “This day did not happen in a vacuum. Jan. 6 marked the continuation of a trend of falsehoods — and tragically, the lies that spawned this act of insurrection are still present in American politics.”

The governor’s office said she will “review all legislation that comes to her desk.”

Nathaniel Cline

Nathaniel Cline

Nathaniel is an award-winning journalist who's been covering news across the country since 2007, including politics at The Loudoun Times-Mirror and The Northern Neck News in Virginia as well as sports for The Plain Dealer in Cleveland, Ohio. He has also hosted podcasts, worked as a television analyst for Spectrum Sports, and appeared as a panelist for conferences and educational programs. A graduate of Bowie State University, Nathaniel grew up in Hawaii and the United Kingdom as a military brat. Five things he must have before leaving home: his cellphone, Black Panther water bottle, hand sanitizer, wedding ring and Philadelphia Eagles keychain.

Virginia Mercury is part of States Newsroom, the nation’s largest state-focused nonprofit news organization.

MORE FROM AUTHOR

12 February 2026

VIDEOS & TRANSCRIPTS & ARTICLE: Rep. Crow signals legal action after administration's effort to indict 6 Democrats & Grand Jury Rebuffs Justice Dept. Attempt to Indict 6 Democrats in Congress 11&10FEB26

 

A grand jury just REFUSED to indict Senators Mark Kelly and Elissa Slotkin for reminding troops they must reject unlawful orders. Humiliating for Pam Bondi, Pete Hegseth, Jeanine Pirro and DJT. GREAT for America.




FASCIST fotze trunt US Attorney jeanine pirro should have learned by now that Grand Juries are not influenced by her swallowing NOT MY pres drumpf's / trumps "load" of neo-nazi authoritarian threats and propaganda. Grand Juries time and again have shown her they understand their responsibility is to uphold the law, and we, the people, are thankful for that. This decision should also send a message to all in the U.S. Military confirming the message to them from Sen Mark Kelly D-AZ, Sen Elissa Slotkin D-MI, Rep Jason Crow D-CO, Rep Maggie Goodlander D-NH, Rep Chrissy Houlahan D-PA, and Rep Chris Deluzio D-PA is both military and civilian law and legal for these politicians to state publicly. Any member of the U.S. Military who has a problem with this message should reconsider why they have joined their respective branch of service and if they do not agree with it they should resign from their branch of service because they are as much a threat to our democratic Republic as a foreign opponent. This quote from 5 time draft dodging c-i-c drumpf / trump....."“SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!” Mr. Trump wrote on his social media site. He shared another person’s post that said, “HANG THEM GEORGE WASHINGTON WOULD !!” " Considering his actions on 6JAN21 it seems he is calling for his own execution! From PBS NewsHour and the New York Times.....

Rep. Crow signals legal action after administration's effort to indict 6 Democrats

Read the Full Transcript

Notice: Transcripts are machine and human generated and lightly edited for accuracy. They may contain errors.

Amna Nawaz:

A federal grand jury put a halt, at least temporarily, into the Trump administration's efforts to prosecute Democratic lawmakers under an anti-insubordination law.

In November, six lawmakers with military and intelligence backgrounds published a message urging members of their former communities to disobey illegal orders. Senators Mark Kelly and Elissa Slotkin of Arizona and Michigan respectively, as well as Representatives Jason Crow of Colorado, Maggie Goodlander of New Hampshire, and Pennsylvania's Chris Deluzio and Chrissy Houlahan each took part in the video.

The Trump administration reportedly sought to indict all six of them.

Joining us now is one of those members. That's former Army Ranger Representative Jason Crow of Colorado.

Congressman, welcome back to the "News Hour." Thanks for being with us.

Rep. Jason Crow (D-CO):

Thank you.

Amna Nawaz:

I want to put to you the response we heard today from House Speaker Mike Johnson in reaction to the DOJ's failure to indict. Here's what he told reporters.

Rep. Mike Johnson (R-LA):

Any time you're obstructing law enforcement and getting into the way of these sensitive operations, it's a very serious thing and it probably is a crime. And, yes, they probably should be indicted.

Amna Nawaz:

What's your response to the leader of your chamber?

Rep. Jason Crow:

Well, it's too bad that Speaker Johnson continues to prostrate himself and sell his soul to Donald Trump.

But let's be really clear. The man has never served a day in his life in uniform. I went three times to war for this country in Iraq and Afghanistan. I was a paratrooper and I was an Army Ranger. From my first day of boot camp, we were taught about the law of war. We were taught about the Constitution.

Before we ever deployed, I sat my men down, my soldiers, my paratroopers, and I taught them about their obligations under the law and the Constitution. This is ingrained in service.

Amna Nawaz:

So your attorney, Abbe Lowell, is now asking the U.S. attorney and D.C., Jeanine Pirro, who is seeking these indictments, to preserve all evidence, all documents, all materials related to this case.

Why is that? Are you going to seek some legal recourse here?

Rep. Jason Crow:

Yes, why that is because I'm unwilling to sit back and let political goons in the administration and the Department of Justice lob grenade after grenade my way and just keep my head down.

They threatened us. They tried to bully and intimidate us. They failed. They will always fail. And if they think they're going to get us the back down, they have another think coming. So what I'm trying to make very clear to them, they tried to send a message to us. They failed.

So I have a message now for them. There's going to be cost to this. There's going to be accountability for this. If you have turned your back on the Constitution, if you are abusing your government position, your position of public trust, if you are abusing process, then we will seek accountability for as long as it takes.

Amna Nawaz:

What does that cost or accountability look like? Are you going to sue the administration, take some other action in Congress?

Rep. Jason Crow:

Well, I'm not going to get into legal strategy, but some of that's up to Donald Trump and the administration. If they want to continue to abuse the process and weaponize America's justice system against political opponents and against Congress, then, yes, there will be recourse, and we're not going to just sit back and take it.

So the ball's kind of in their core. They have a decision to make.

Amna Nawaz:

As you know, all this evidence went before a grand jury that declined to bring charges here. You have heard the saying, I'm sure, that a grand jury could indict a ham sandwich because of that lower legal standard in a grand jury as opposed to a criminal trial.

The fact that this group of Americans declined to charge anyone, the fact that we have now had two different grand juries refuse to reindict Letitia James, another political enemy of the president, does all of this say to you that the system, at least this piece of the system, is working?

Rep. Jason Crow:

Yes, that's exactly the message here, is the founders of our Constitution knew that this could happen, knew that exactly the scenario that played out yesterday could play out, that you would have a runaway, rogue, lawless administration that would abuse the system.

The system is working. And this is actually failing. This is blowing back. Let's be really clear here that they thought they were going to chill dissent. They thought that they were going to intimidate and bully Americans, because the message was not to us. They came after us to send a message to America that, if you dare step out of line, that we will come for you and the cost will be too high.

But, instead, what happened is they awakened the courage, the tenacity, and the resilience of the American people, just like what happened in Minneapolis. Every time they abuse process, they murder Americans, they come after political opponents, the tide continues to turn more in favor of democracy.

Amna Nawaz:

At the same time, are you at all worried the federal prosecutors could seek an indictment through some other means?

Rep. Jason Crow:

They might. They might try.

I mean, God knows they have tried in repeated cases before, but we will be ready, right? Listen, nothing that they're going to do here to come after me and to come after folks in my position is going to get me to back down from my job.

Amna Nawaz:

So let me revisit that original message you and others posted urging military members to remember their oath, to disobey illegal orders. Do you yourself now believe that President Trump is issuing and that military and intelligence officers are executing illegal or unlawful orders?

Rep. Jason Crow:

I think Donald Trump has violated the law by sending our military to do things without congressional authorization. I think they violated the law with several strikes in the Caribbean.

We know they violated the law by sending the National Guard into several states because courts have struck those deployments down. He threatened to send troops to polling stations, which is a violation of U.S. criminal law. He threatened to shoot protesters in Lafayette Square in his first administration.

He has threatened to kill the family members and children of terrorists, which would be a violation of the law of war and would be murder under U.S. law. So if he carries out any of those threats and puts our service members in that position, what we wanted to do is remind them that the American people will have their back, that Congress will have their back, and that their Constitution and, again, the rule of law is their North Star.

Amna Nawaz:

As you're speaking directly to those service members now, they just saw the DOJ try to charge sitting lawmakers, right, for delivering this message about disobeying unlawful orders. Why should they believe that the system will protect them if they come forward or disobey those orders?

Rep. Jason Crow:

Well, we're going to have their back, for one.

The tide is turning and Americans are stepping up. They have had enough of the corruption. They have had enough of Donald Trump and his family lining their pockets at their expense. They have had enough of the military adventurism.

You know, Donald Trump bombed seven countries in his first year. They have had enough of that. And I have had enough of that. And they want something new and different. And they're stepping up. So, yes, I have amazing faith in the American people to join with us to retake their democracy.

Amna Nawaz:

That is Congressman Jason Crow, Democrat from Colorado, joining us tonight.

Congressman, thank you. It's good to speak with you.

Rep. Jason Crow:

Thank you





The rejection was a remarkable rebuke, suggesting that ordinary citizens did not believe that the lawmakers had committed any crimes.

Feb. 10, 2026

Federal prosecutors in Washington sought and failed on Tuesday to secure an indictment against six Democratic lawmakers who posted a video in the fall that enraged President Trump by reminding active-duty members of the military and intelligence community that they were obligated to refuse illegal orders, four people familiar with the matter said.

It was remarkable that the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington — led by Jeanine Pirro, a longtime ally of Mr. Trump’s — authorized prosecutors to go into a grand jury and ask for an indictment of the six members of Congress, all of whom had served in the military or the nation’s spy agencies.

But it was even more remarkable that a group of ordinary citizens sitting on the grand jury in Federal District Court in Washington forcefully rejected Mr. Trump’s bid to label their expression of dissent as a criminal act warranting prosecution.

The move to charge the lawmakers — among them, Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona and Senator Elissa Slotkin of Michigan — was, by any measure, an extraordinary attempt by Trump appointees to politicize the criminal justice system even for a Justice Department that has repeatedly shattered norms of independence from the White House and followed Mr. Trump’s directives to prosecute his adversaries.

But manipulating bureaucratic levers is not the same thing as controlling the entire criminal justice system.

Before Mr. Trump’s second term, it had been exceedingly rare for grand jurors to rebuff requests by prosecutors seeking indictments. It is now happening with increased frequency, as Mr. Trump’s appointees push ahead with questionable cases in an effort to appease him.

On Tuesday, prosecutors presenting the case sought to persuade the grand jurors that the lawmakers had violated a statute that forbids interfering with the loyalty, morale or discipline of the U.S. armed forces, according to one of the people familiar with the matter.

They sought to bring charges against Mr. Kelly, Ms. Slotkin and their four colleagues in the House: Jason Crow, a former Army Ranger; Maggie Goodlander, a former Navy reservist; Chrissy Houlahan, a former Air Force officer; and Chris Deluzio, a Navy veteran.

The Justice Department declined to comment.

Ms. Slotkin welcomed the outcome. “No matter what President Trump and Pirro continue to do with this case, tonight we can score one for the Constitution, our freedom of speech, and the rule of law,” she said in a statement.

Mr. Kelly denounced the administration’s repeated efforts to target him and his colleagues.

“This is an outrageous abuse of power by Donald Trump and his lackeys,” he said in a statement. “Donald Trump wants every American to be too scared to speak out against him. The most patriotic thing any of us can do is not back down.”

Time and again, the Justice Department under Mr. Trump has brought questionable criminal cases against foes of the president — among them, James B. Comey, the former F.B.I. director, and Letitia James, New York’s attorney general.

Even though many of these cases have been weak, the department has apparently determined that it may be better to fail in court rather than push back against Mr. Trump’s well-known desire for revenge.

The president, emboldened by his success in bending the Justice Department and F.B.I. to his will, has intensified his effort to deploy the vast arsenal of federal law enforcement to pursue his political agenda and personal grievances.

The department recently opened investigations into Democratic officials in Minnesota who opposed his immigration crackdown, and arrested the journalist Don Lemon over his presence at a church protest in Minneapolis. Last week, the F.B.I. searched an elections office in the Atlanta area based on debunked claims that the 2020 presidential election was stolen.


In November, Ms. Pirro, a longtime Trump ally, approved a criminal investigation into Jerome H. Powell, the Fed chairman, whom Mr. Trump has long sought to supplant.

The case against the lawmakers was prompted by an online video organized by Ms. Slotkin, a former C.I.A. analyst who served multiple tours in Iraq. It did not mention any specific order or military scenario. But it was released as Mr. Trump was authorizing strikes against suspected drug boats in the Caribbean and considered deploying active-duty military troops to American cities to quell protests.

The lawmakers took turns reading a statement in which they cautioned that the “threats to our Constitution aren’t just coming from abroad, but from right here at home.”

“Our laws are clear,” said Mr. Kelly, a Navy veteran and former astronaut. “You can refuse illegal orders.”

Almost immediately, the video drew the ire of Mr. Trump, who demanded that the lawmakers be punished and even suggested that they should be executed.

“SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!” Mr. Trump wrote on his social media site. He shared another person’s post that said, “HANG THEM GEORGE WASHINGTON WOULD !!”

Days later, the six lawmakers disclosed that the F.B.I. had contacted the House and Senate sergeants-at-arms requesting interviews with them, indicating that a criminal investigation was underway.

“President Trump is using the F.B.I. as a tool to intimidate and harass members of Congress,” the four House members who took part in the video said in a joint statement. “No amount of intimidation or harassment will ever stop us from doing our jobs and honoring our Constitution.”

Mr. Kelly is also facing a separate investigation by the Pentagon into what military officials described as “serious allegations of misconduct.”

In a social media post in November, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said that the video was “despicable, reckless, and false,” and he asserted that the lawmakers, whom he disparaged as the “Seditious Six,” were encouraging troops to “ignore the orders of their Commanders.”

“Their foolish screed sows doubt and confusion — which only puts our warriors in danger,” Mr. Hegseth wrote.


Alan Feuer covers extremism and political violence for The Times, focusing on the criminal cases involving the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol and against former President Donald J. Trump.


Glenn Thrush covers the Department of Justice for The Times and has also written about gun violence, civil rights and conditions in the country’s jails and prisons.


Michael S. Schmidt is an investigative reporter for The Times covering Washington. His work focuses on tracking and explaining high-profile federal investigations.