NORTON META TAG

Showing posts with label right wing christian hypocrisy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label right wing christian hypocrisy. Show all posts

22 January 2019

The government doesn't even know how many families it separated 22JAN19

Related image
THIS update from the ACLU on the racist, hateful, xenophobic policies of the drumpf / trump - pence administration in response to the refugee crisis on our southern border. Here is something for the Christian supporters of this administration's handling of refugees and asylum seekers, what if Egypt had turned Mary, Joseph and Jesus away at the border? Or separated the family and then lost track of Jesus?
Ever since we filed our class action lawsuit, Ms. L v. ICE, almost one year ago, the Trump administration keeps changing its story on family separation.
First, they said the policy didn't exist. Then they admitted to separating dozens, then hundreds, then thousands of kids, including infants and toddlers. And now, a new report says there could be thousands more than the 2,737 children that the Trump administration had previously reported. Because the government failed to track all the families it tore apart.
This policy has been a disaster from the start, and the more we learn, the worse it gets. Recently, we learned that the Trump administration wanted to specifically target parents for prosecution, hoping that the horror of family separation would deter immigration. Some officials even suggested denying the separated children's legal right to a full asylum hearing.
Here's a quick recap of what's happened since we sued last year: In June a federal judge directed the government to halt separations and to reunite children with their parents, and public outrage from activists like you forced President Trump to rescind the policy that same month. Since then, we've been fighting tooth and nail to reunite all the families – because the Trump administration refused. We even traveled to Central America to find the parents the government deported without their kids.
Though we were able to reunite many families, this crisis isn't over. Federal inspectors have found that separations are still happening, even after the court order to stop.
Craig, I know it's hard to keep up with the news about this needlessly cruel policy – especially when not even the government itself has a clear picture of how many families it separated. But you can count on us to keep fighting. We'll be back in court to make sure every single family is accounted for.
Thanks for your support,
Lee Gelernt
Lee Gelernt
Deputy Director of the ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project
P.S. Last week I weighed in on this report, and explained how the ACLU will be back in court to order the government to explain itself. Read more in The New York Times.
BY THE BY, I AM A PROUD MEMBER OF AND A MONTHLY SUPPORTER THE ACLU, HAVE BEEN FOR YEARS. Please consider joining or at least joining if you can.

19 June 2018

Trump’s Remarkable Admission About Dishonesty & The Power of the Small Lie 15JUN & 11MAI18

Image result for goebbels quote propaganda
NOT MY pres drumpf/trump is a systematic liar, he uses lies and deceit to manipulate public opinion to justify his opinions and actions that generally would be objectionable to his audience, in this case the American people. NOT MY vice-pres pence, the entire drumpf/trump-pence administration as well as the republican political leadership and many of the parties elected officials are systematic liars, repeating with little difference drumpf/trump's lies to lull the American people into lemming like acceptance of the fascist authoritarianism they want to impose. From The Atlantic.....

Trump’s Remarkable Admission About Dishonesty

The president is open in his affection for oppressive rulers and in saying it’s acceptable to lie to the public. Why does anyone still doubt he means it?
For some reason, there remains a public debate about whether the president of the United States is honest or inclined toward autocracy. There’s a certain logic to this: Voters don’t want to believe they elected a chronic liar or a skeptic of democracy and rule of law, and the traditional conventions of press coverage prevent mainstream media from stating otherwise plainly.

Yet on a regular basis, Donald Trump speaks publicly and makes clear both his dishonesty and autocratic impulses. Friday was an especially clear demonstration.

The president strode out from the White House in the morning, first appearing on Fox and Friends alongside Steve Doocy, and then taking some questions from reporters on the lawn of the executive mansion. While he covered a range of topics, and went through many of his greatest hits, the most notable elements were his praise for the totalitarian rule of North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, his own declarations of criminal behavior by political opponents, and a series of easily disprovable statements about immigration law and a Justice Department inspector general’s report released Thursday.

While Trump has shown surprising deference and affection for autocratic rulers in the past, including effusive praise for Kim after the summit earlier this week, Friday’s comments were still unusual.

“He is the head of a country and I mean he is the strong head,” Trump said. “Don't let anyone think anything different. He speaks and his people sit up at attention. I want my people to do the same.”

I want my people to do the same. It ought to go without saying that the reason that North Koreans react that way to Kim is that he is a brutal dictator who runs enormous prison camps and a repressive state. Lest anyone believe that Trump is simply naive and unaware of this, the president made clear that he understands how Kim maintains power, smirking through a reference to North Korean executions of top aides.
“Just before you met with him, he cleaned house. Three of his top hardliners he fired,” Doocy began.

“When you say he fired ... fired may be a nice word,” Trump replied. The president later claimed he was being “sarcastic,” a move he and aides have often employed to walk back egregious statements, even when there is no indication of humor at the moment, and even though his latest statement about Kim matches his earlier praise for him.
Trump also misrepresented the agreement he signed with Kim, saying that it contained detailed steps for denuclearization of North Korea—it doesn’t.
The other most notable moment came during the gaggle, when reporters asked Trump about a statement to The New York Times concerning a June 2016 meeting at Trump Tower between Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner, and campaign chairman Paul Manafort, along with a Russian lawyer. The president dictated the statement, as his lawyers acknowledged in a letter to special counsel Robert Mueller. That statement was false and quickly debunked.
“That's irrelevant,” Trump said Friday. “It's a statement to The New York Times, the phony, failing New York Times. That's not a statement to a high tribunal of judges. That's a statement to the phony New York Times.”

In short, the president is saying that it’s totally acceptable to lie to the press, and by extension the public, as long as he is not under oath in the justice system. (As I’ve reported, Trump is far more honest under oath.) As a matter of law, this is true, but as a matter of character and leadership, it is not. The president is freely telling the public that he has no compunctions about lying through his teeth. Why does anyone still debate whether he means it?
There were other dishonest statements peppered throughout his remarks. He said that the inspector general’s report found “total bias” in the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails; in fact, it found the reverse, saying political bias did not affect decisions. He said that the report “totally exonerated” his statements; in fact, it rejected the entire thrust of his statements about Comey. Trump said that Comey acted criminally; the IG report does not say that. He said Mueller’s team has no Republicans; Mueller is a lifelong Republican who has served under GOP presidents as well as Democrats.

Trump also continues to misrepresent the reasons why children of unauthorized immigrants are currently being separated from their parents at the border, creating a political firestorm. That decision, as Attorney General Jeff Sessions has acknowledged, is the direct result of a policy change that Sessions implemented in May. Nonetheless, the president has falsely blamed it on a law passed by Democrats, ignoring that Democrats do not control Congress and have not passed any new laws about separations, yet the change began only last month.

“That is a Democrat bill. That is Democrats wanting to do that,” Trump said. “And they could solve it very easily by getting together but they think it's a good election point.”
There’s a long list of these lies, both in what Trump said today and running back for months. It becomes tiresome to fact-check them, trying to prove that Trump is not telling the truth about them. But there’s no need to take reporters’ word for it: The president makes no secret that he thinks it’s OK to lie to the public. After all, he said so himself.
The president has repeatedly “revealed” the same catchphrase as new, demonstrating how he uses minor untruths to confuse the public and destabilize facts.

Early in his Thursday-night rally in Elkhart, Indiana, President Trump had a special treat for Hoosiers: He was going to make them the first to hear the tagline for his reelection campaign.
“By the way, this is the first, for Indiana,” he confided. “Our new slogan for 2020. You know what it is? ‘Keep America Great.’ Because we’re doing so well that in another two years when we start the heavy campaign, ‘Make America Great Again’ wouldn’t work out too well.”

The crowd cheered, and the press dutifully reported that the president had revealed the new slogan.
But wait a second—that’s not quite right. Didn’t Trump announce his new slogan exactly two months prior, on March 10, in Moon, Pennsylvania? Trump said he was revealing “Keep America Great” then, too, earning the same dutiful headlines. In its writeup, the Washington Examiner focused on how Trump had emphasized the exclamation mark at the end of the phrase.

But wait, that also sounds familiar. Days before his 2017 inauguration, Trump sat for an interview with Karen Tumulty of The Washington Post, in which he triumphantly described how he’d come up with the “Make America Great Again” line. (In reality, as Tumulty pointed out, he hadn’t—Ronald Reagan’s 1980 campaign first used the phrase, but the Gipper never trademarked it.) Then this happened, according to Tumulty:

Halfway through his interview with The Washington Post, Trump shared a bit of news: He already has decided on his slogan for a reelection bid in 2020.

“Are you ready?” he said. “‘Keep America Great,’ exclamation point.”
This is vintage Trump. He knows it’s not true that he’s really announcing something new, but he also figures that the people at the rally won’t know anybetter. They weren’t in Moon, and most of the press—no matter how much he maligns them—won’t realize it’s a retread either, leaving the claim largely unchallenged. You can’t make an untruth a truth simply by repeating it enough times, but you might get people to forget it’s not true.

The slogan was not the only example Thursday night of Trump’s tendency to repeat a lie until his audience is numb to it. For example, Trump keeps insisting that his border wall is under construction, although it is not. “We have to build a wall and we have already started the wall,” he said at the Indiana rally. This is not true. There is ongoing work on existing border fences, and the spending bill passed by Congress in March (and signed by a frustrated Trump) allocates $1.6 billion for that effort. But it explicitly prevents the construction of any of the new border-wall prototypes the president has ordered.

Now, one could argue that the fence is the wall—but the fence existed before the election, and Trump’s raison de courir was that a real wall, broad and deep and high, was needed. Claiming that this new wall is under construction is simply false, but the president keeps saying it, even tweeting pictures of a project that began in 2009 and claiming they show his wall.

To bolster the claim on Thursday, Trump delivered a strange bit about the border fence outside San Diego, which contained a dizzying series of claims. Congress appropriated $251 million for secondary fencing there, where a fence already exists. Echoing a tweet in April, Trump said the people of San Diego were eager for a wall, which may or may not be true, although its city council and Republican mayor have been less positive. Then he said that he should have refused to build the wall there, so that San Diegans would pressure California Governor Jerry Brown, a frequent Trump sparring partner, to back border-security measures. Finally, he claimed that—actually—he had asked his aides what it would cost to halt construction, so that San Diegans would pressure Brown.

“They got back to me and said it would cost approximately $7 million to stop. That is not big numbers when you hear about the numbers we talk about, $7 million to stop and restart at a later date,” Trump said. “I said, ‘I can’t do that to the American people, keep building the wall.’”
The whole thing is peculiar: Even if he decided against the plan in the end, the president is saying he considered punishing his own supporters to make a political point, and considered burning millions of taxpayer money to do it. As far as I can tell, these alleged internal discussions haven’t been reported anywhere previously, and it’s unclear whether they really happened. Customs and Border Patrol referred to the White House for comment, and a spokeswoman did not immediately reply.
Trump’s adventures in bogus claims extended overseas, too. He devoted a long section of his speech to a discussion of how he had supposedly saved millions of dollars on the construction of the new U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem. This time around, he didn’t really place a solid figure on what he claims the embassy will run, but he’s told this story several times before, with varying amounts. In March, he said it would cost $250,000. In April, he said it would be more like $400,000. In both cases, he was misleading. The six-figure price tag is for a temporary embassy in Jerusalem, while the U.S. is still working to build a new, permanent embassy, which will be more expensive. (The GOP megadonor Sheldon Adelson has offered to chip in for the cost.)
Elsewhere in the speech, Trump claimed that the Obama administration “gave” Iran $150 billion as part of the nuclear deal, which is misleading both in terms of the size and what the monies were—Iranian funds that had been frozen. He also said, “We have a trade deficit with almost every country in the world. We are changing that around rapidly.” But the trade deficit actually grewduring his first year in office.

Once listeners were snowed under with these claims, Trump laid the groundwork for other outlandish statements of the vaguer variety. “What we did was unprecedented in the history of our country and the history of the world, what we did with this election,” Trump said. Insofar as Donald Trump had never previously been elected president of the United States, this is true, though it’s hard to extract anything more meaningful. “We have delivered, one of the only times ever, more than we promised,” he said. “I have delivered more than I promised, if you think about it.” As I have written, Trump has pushed hard on his central promises, from the wall to Obamacare repeal to the travel ban, but many of them remain incomplete, and this claim isn’t remotely true.
Critics sometimes suggest that Trump is employing Adolf Hitler’s infamous “big lie” tactic. In fact, what Trump is using is the opposite: It’s the small lie. Through sheer repetition, Trump convinces the public and the press that what he’s saying is true, and his slogan really is new and being revealed for the first time. Piece by piece, objective reality corrodes, and facts give way to alternative facts.
DAVID A. GRAHAM is a staff writer at The Atlantic, where he covers U.S. politics and global news.

11 June 2018

Here Are All the Emails the FCC Received From People Complaining About “Roseanne” Being Canceled. 7JUN18


14. That is the number of people who e mailed the FCC complaining about ABC canceling roseanne's show because she is a racist puke. From Mother Jones...... 
Last month ABC cancelled Roseanne Barr’s sitcom, “Roseanne,” after the comedian sent a racist tweet about former Obama White House aide Valerie Jarrett. Although Barr’s Twitter feed had been a bog of right-wing conspiracy theories for months, conservatives rallied to Barr’s defense. President Donald Trump complained about a double-standard on Twitter. Others bombarded…the Federal Communications Commission. Per a Freedom of Information Act Request, here’s a list of every complaint the FCC received about the Roseanne firing:

FIGHTING DISINFORMATION

As President Trump and his acolytes ramp up their efforts to distort the truth and discredit the Mueller investigation, you can see how urgent our new priority to build a team focused on exposing disinformation will be.
If you're fed up with the lies coming from Washington and proliferating on social mediahelp us push back with a tax-deductible donation today.
We still need to raise about $140,000 by June 30 so we can bring on a full-time reporter and a data scientist to dig deep on disinformation—who's behind it, how it spreads, and how we can counter it—before this fall's midterms. Please don't sit this one out. Join us and your fellow MoJoreaders today.

30 April 2018

Paul Ryan fires House chaplain, reportedly for being way too Christian & House chaplain forced out by Ryan 26APR18


THE main question I have is where is the outrage, the accusations against the drumpf/trump-pence administration and the republican party of waging war on Christianity, especially from the "religious" right wing? paul ryan's hypocritical action in firing House Chaplain Patrick Conroy is a perfect example of a Christian being persecuted for living his faith. And yet, silence from the "religious" supporters of drumpf/trump-pence and the republican party. From DailyKos and The Hill.....
Paul Ryan fires House chaplain, reportedly for being way too Christian


"Devout" Catholic Speaker Paul Ryan has apparently fired House Chaplain Patrick Conroy, whose resignation explicitly says Ryan forced him out.
"As you have requested, I hereby offer my resignation as the 60th Chaplain of the United States House of Representatives." the April 15 letter to Ryan, obtained by The Hill, states. […]
The thinking among Democrats is that Ryan pushed Conroy out "because Republicans thought he was aligned with Democrats," according to a senior Democratic aide familiar with the discussion.
Conroy has served as chaplain since 2011, where he has been what he's supposed to be. A Christian. Like in the prayer he gave back in November on the first day of the mark-up of the tax scam bill and gently nudged members to think about the meek.
"May all Members be mindful that the institutions and structures of our great Nation guarantee the opportunities that have allowed some to achieve great success, while others continue to struggle," Conroy said at the time. "May their efforts these days guarantee that there are not winners and losers under new tax laws, but benefits balanced and shared by all Americans."
So apparently Conroy was too aligned with Democrats. Maybe because Jesus would be aligned with the Democrats. That's how much of a sociopath Paul Ryan is.

House chaplain forced out by Ryan

BY MELANIE ZANONA AND MIKE LILLIS - 

House Chaplain Patrick Conroy’s sudden resignation has sparked a furor on Capitol Hill, with sources in both parties saying he was pushed out by Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.).
Conroy’s own resignation announcement stated that it was done at Ryan’s request.
“As you have requested, I hereby offer my resignation as the 60th Chaplain of the United States House of Representatives,” the April 15 letter to Ryan, obtained by The Hill, states.
Through his office, Conroy, who has served as chaplain since 2011, declined to comment on Thursday. His resignation is effective May 24.
Four different sources — two from each party — say Conroy was told that he must retire or that he would be dismissed.
The message from Ryan was delivered by his chief of staff, Jonathan Burks.
The issue has riled House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who broached the episode during the Democrats’ whip meeting in the Capitol Thursday morning. 
A bipartisan group of lawmakers are planning to send a letter to Ryan requesting additional information regarding Conroy’s dismissal; the group is currently circulating the letter among colleagues to collect more signatures.
The thinking among Democrats is that Ryan pushed Conroy out “because Republicans thought he was aligned with Democrats,” according to a senior Democratic aide familiar with the discussion.
House chaplains, who offer an opening prayer each day the House is in session, are supposed to be nonpartisan.
It’s unclear exactly what if any political dispute, however, led to the chaplain’s dismissal.
A Democratic lawmaker said that the Speaker took issue with a prayer on the House floor that could have been perceived as being critical of the GOP tax-cut bill.
On Nov. 6 — the first day of the markup on the GOP's tax bill — Conroy in a prayer urged lawmakers to ensure the legislation did not exacerbate the nation's gaping class disparities.
"May all Members be mindful that the institutions and structures of our great Nation guarantee the opportunities that have allowed some to achieve great success, while others continue to struggle," Conroy said at the time. "May their efforts these days guarantee that there are not winners and losers under new tax laws, but benefits balanced and shared by all Americans."
 
A senior GOP aide said Conroy’s exit “was not because of any particular prayer."
 
Ryan’s and Pelosi’s offices agree that Pelosi was told in advance that the chaplain was leaving.
AshLee Strong, a spokeswoman for Ryan, said it was Ryan’s decision, but declined to offer a reason for the move. She added that Pelosi and her office “were fully read in and did not object.”
"The speaker told Leader Pelosi that he would not move forward with the decision if she objected and she chose not to," Strong said. 
In a separate statement to media outlets late Thursday, Strong said, "The speaker consulted with the minority leader, but the decision was his. He remains grateful for Father Conroy’s service."
Pelosi’s office disputed that the Democrat did not object.
“Leader Pelosi was given advance notice by Speaker Ryan," said a Pelosi spokesman, but she “also made it clear to Speaker Ryan that she disagreed with this decision.”
A second Democratic aide said Conroy’s ouster was “largely driven by a speech on the tax bill that the Speaker didn't like.” But the source also offered a second reason.
“Some of the more conservative evangelical Republicans didn't like that the Father had invited a Muslim person to give the opening prayer,” the source said.
When Pelosi, who is Catholic, informed members of her whip team on Thursday morning that Conroy was pushed out against his will, it “shocked” the members, according to one lawmaker.
Catholic members on both sides of the aisle were furious to learn that Conroy’s retirement was not voluntary, according to multiple sources, including one Republican lawmaker and one Democratic member.
Ryan, who is also Catholic, has appointed Rep. Doug Collins (R-Ga.), an Air Force Reserve chaplain, as well as Reps. Mark Walker (R-N.C.) and Tim Walberg (R-Mich.), both former pastors, to lead the search effort to find a replacement.
Conroy’s arrival on Capitol Hill was also marked with some controversy. The Jesuit priest was nominated by former Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) in May 2011, but Pelosi urged additional vetting of the pick after learning that Conroy was then working for a Catholic religious order — the Oregon Province of the Society of Jesus — that had agreed just months earlier to pay $166 million to victims of sexual abuse going back decades.
There was no evidence that Conroy was involved in the scandal, nor did Pelosi suggest that was the case. After further questioning, she endorsed his nomination.
– Juliegrace Brufke and Scott Wong contributed to this report, which was updated at 8:23 p.m. 

04 March 2018

Northam threatens (nicely) to use amendment to muscle in Medicaid & Thousands flock to free medical clinic, as Washington dithers on health care 2MAR18&21JUL17

Thousands flock to annual free medical clinic in Wise, Virginia , as Richmond dithers on health care
Related image Related image
Whatever the Virginia assembly does with Medicaid expansion the legislation must stipulate it replaces the current health insurance for all members of the assembly, their staffs, all assembly employees as well as the governor, lt governor and their staffs. The taxpayers of Virginia, no matter one's income level, are the employers, these people are our employees and their health insurance program should not be any better than what they would legislate for the least among us who are also Virginia Assembly employers. It is time we the people start reminding the politicians that no matter how much the rich and corporate Virginians have paid to get them elected we can remove them from office if we have to, just consider the results of the 2017 commonwealth election. 
Northam threatens (nicely) to use amendment to muscle in Medicaid
 Gov. Ralph Northam on Friday gently warned state budget negotiators to send him a spending plan that includes Medicaid expansion or he will add expansion as an amendment, a procedure that gives him a stronger hand in the Senate.
If forced to go that route, Northam (D) said, he would have more power to shape an expansion deal already passed by House Republicans that calls for work requirements, co-pays and other conservative measures.
“We’ve obviously compromised, and if I send an amendment down — which I will if I need to — some of those compromises won’t be in there,” Northam later told reporters, noting that he would have more say over how to spend the $420 million in projected savings from expansion.
Northam won office last year on a promise to expand the federal-state health-care program to as many as 400,000 uninsured Virginians. Republicans in the House and Senate steadfastly blocked expansion for four years under Northam’s predecessor, Terry McAuliffe (D), saying the federal government could not afford to make good on its promise to pick up most of the $2 billion-a-year tab.
Opposition in the House softened this year after Republicans nearly lost control of the chamber in November elections. But there has been no visible shift in the state Senate. The GOP controls both chambers by two seats.
One longtime Republican moderate, Sen. Emmett W. Hanger Jr. (R-Augusta), supports expansion in some form, although he has objections to the plan passed by the House. Even if the plan could be modified to suit Hanger, the budget would still die on a 20-to-20 vote.
Lt. Gov. Justin Fairfax (D) presides over the Senate and can break most ties, but he is prohibited from voting on the budget. So Northam needs to win over two Republicans to pass a budget with expansion.
But Fairfax is allowed to vote on budget amendments. So if the legislature sends Northam a budget without expansion, Northam could add it as an amendment — one that could clear the Senate as long as a single Republican votes for it and Fairfax breaks the tie.
Northam made his intentions clear Friday morning over breakfast with a bipartisan group of state senators and delegates appointed as budget conferees. Their task is to reconcile the House and Senate budgets before the legislature adjourns March 10.
Using a budget amendment to muscle through something as consequential as Medicaid expansion would be something of a hardball tactic for Northam, a soft-spoken former state senator and pediatrician with close friendships in both parties. But he did not overtly present the scenario as a threat. He shared it in response to a question posed by Senate Majority Leader Thomas K. Norment (R-James City), co-chairman of the Senate Finance Committee and a budget conferee.
“I answered his question that I did plan to send an amendment down,” Northam told reporters hours later at an afternoon gathering.
Asked how his response was received, Northam said: “I was asked a question, and I responded to it. . . . I didn’t have to do the Heimlich on anyone, so it was all good.”
Sen. Stephen D. Newman (R-Bedford), one of the budget negotiators, described the breakfast as “a very good, affable meeting.”
“I appreciate the governor’s candor,” Newman said. “He’s always an honest and honorable man to work with, and he has been straightforward on this, as he has been on other things.”
But he took Northam’s statement as a concession that the legislature will send him a budget without expansion.
“I’m pleased to hear the governor stating publicly that he kind of anticipates the likelihood that the Senate will stay very strong throughout the entire budget process,” Newman said.
Newman also questioned whether the governor could count on Hanger’s support for such an amendment, given the senator’s concerns about the House-approved expansion plan.
“I don’t see a pathway today toward the McAuliffe-Northam plan,” Newman said. “I don’t know anyone . . . that anticipates that plan could actually make it in a reconvene session or in a regular session. I think Mr. Hanger and others who want to find a way in the Senate have said very clearly that that approach won’t work.”
Laura Vozzella covers Virginia politics for The Washington Post.
 The sick and the disabled pour out of these mountains every summer for their one shot at free health care, but this year was supposed to hold hope for a better solution.
Donald Trump won the White House in part on a promise to fix the nation’s costly and inefficient health-care system. Instead, Republicans in Congress are paralyzed and threatening to dismantle the imperfect framework of Obamacare.
No relief is in sight for someone like Larry McKnight, who sat in a horse stall at the Wise County Fairgrounds having his shoulder examined. He was among more than a thousand people attending the area’s 18th annual Remote Area Medical clinic, where physicians and dentists dispense free care to those who otherwise have none.
“I really think that they don’t have any clue what’s going on,” McKnight said of political leaders in Washington. “You watch the news and it’s two sides pitted against each other, which in turn just makes them pitted against us, the normal person.”
About 1,100 such people descended on the fairgrounds Friday, with more expected Saturday and Sunday. Medical personnel from across the state were there with makeshift examination rooms in tents and sheds. Sheets hung from clothespins for privacy; giant fans pulled hot air through buildings intended for livestock shows.
These events are staged nationwide, but the Wise clinic is among the biggest, drawing people from throughout Appalachia and casting Washington’s sterile political debates into the starkest human terms.
A third of the patients who registered Friday were unemployed. Those who couldn’t afford a room slept in their cars or camped in the fields around the fairgrounds. They lined up in the dead of night to get a spot inside the event.
Tabitha Lindley and her mother, Tammy Lindley, check for messages before dawn after sleeping in their car. In the foreground is Dalton Barton, Tabitha’s fiancee. They hoped to get dental work done. (Michael S. Williamson/The Washington Post)
Josh Phillips waited all night, with hundreds of others, for a chance at dental work. He rested in a wheelchair as he waited to be sent to a check-in area. (Michael S. Williamson/The Washington Post)
It is the place of last resort for people who can’t afford insurance even under Obamacare or who don’t qualify for Medicaid in a state where the legislature has resisted expansion.
At 37, with a long graying ponytail, McKnight had never been sick until about eight months ago. So he hadn’t worried too much about not being able to afford insurance on his roughly $18,000 a year in pay as an auto mechanic. But now he was getting a referral to the University of Virginia hospital to check for the source of his pain, which he had vowed to withstand without resorting to opioid medication.
“The normal person doesn’t care about a lot of the things that they care about [in Washington]. Most people want to work, they want insurance and they want to be able to take care of their family without assistance,” he said.
The only way to do that, he said, is to have everybody — the healthy and the sick — paying into a centralized health insurance plan. “I really think the only thing that would truly help this country is if it were single-payer,” McKnight said.
Around here, that’s not politics, it’s just life. Many of these people voted for Trump — not only for his vow to fix health care, but also for his promise to bring back the coal industry. They’re still waiting for results, with varying degrees of patience.
Patricia McConnell was having trouble speaking around the bloody gauze in her mouth. She had just had four teeth pulled. The unemployed former manager of a McDonald’s had driven eight hours from her home in Glen Burnie, Md., to attend the clinic.

Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe hugs Patricia McConnell, who saved money for six months for gas and a hotel room to attend the Remote Area Medical event and have dental work done. (Michael S. Williamson/The Washington Post)
“My teeth were hurting,” she said. McConnell, 63 and disabled, said she had health insurance through Medicaid but no dental coverage.
So this was her dental plan: She’d save for six months to afford a motel room and gas, then wait in line in the morning heat to see a volunteer dentist.
McConnell has been watching the health-care debate in Washington and wondering if it will ever amount to anything that actually helps people like her. “I don’t know what they’re trying to do,” she said, struggling to get the words out around the gauze.
She voted for Trump, she said, and still feels that he’s working hard to help. But his anger and his tweets seem to aggravate Congress, and no one is working together, she said.
They need to set all that aside and work to pass health care for everyone, she said. “Let’s get this done.”
Others had a hard time mustering the faith that anyone cared.
“They’re trying to kill us poor people, is what they’re trying to do,” said Robert Horne, 55, a disabled former construction worker seeking dental care. Horne said he voted for Hillary Clinton last fall because of her pledge to maintain the Affordable Care Act.
That didn’t work out, either.
Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D), who flew out to the clinic Friday morning, had invited Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to join him but said that the Republican leader “politely” declined. McAuliffe, who visits the clinic every year, spent nearly two hours touring it — twice as long as scheduled — and took every opportunity to proclaim that he’s been trying for three years to get the state legislature to agree to expand Medicaid under Obamacare.
The Republican-controlled General Assembly has resisted, unlike the legislatures in nearby states, which McAuliffe kept reminding the patients and doctors who crowded around him on the hot fairgrounds.
Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe chats with Joey Johnson of Clintwood, Va., who is confined to a wheelchair. (Michael S. Williamson/The Washington Post)
Kaitlen Hagy, 3, tries to keep cool with a hand fan at the Wise County Fairgrounds. She was in line for eyeglasses. (Michael S. Williamson/The Washington Post)
“All of our neighbors in Kentucky and West Virginia and Maryland — they did it!” he said to a Christian counseling group that had set up shop under an awning. But in Virginia, he said, legislators turned down millions in federal dollars that would be available under Medicaid expansion.
“We need it,” called out Tonya Hall, operations director for a hospice-care facility. “Let them come and visit some in southwest Virginia. Let them see the poverty. Let them see how we live. Let them come.”
“This isn’t about politics,” McAuliffe said.
“Right!” Hall agreed. “It’s about people.”
“It’s about people’s lives,” McAuliffe said to a round of “Amens” from the group.
Hall, 42, said she had voted for Trump but that she was disappointed he hadn’t been able to do anything to improve the health-care system. If Obamacare can’t be fixed, she said, “then I say we scrap it and start over. You can see the need,” she added, gesturing at the masses of people waiting for their turn with a medical professional.
Beyond her, a long line stretched into the triage tent, where people were sorted and their vital signs measured. Allen Sexton, 37, was there to have all his teeth removed, years after a car accident had left them a scrambled mess.
In a metal shed nearby, vision specialists sat in darkness, performing eye exams in pools of light. One man said that his glasses had broken a year ago and that he couldn’t see at a distance or up close, but he’d been driving anyway.
There was another tent for orthopedic care. Another for basic checkups. Each one was full, with more people waiting outside on metal folding chairs or standing in lines.
Politicians prowled the fairgrounds. Several area legislators attended while Attorney General Mark Herring (D), running for reelection, walked with McAuliffe and Sen. Tim Kaine (D) helped register patients.
Stan Brock, the English philanthropist who founded the RAM clinic program more than 30 years ago, said there was one more visitor he’d like to see at the clinic.
“It’s absolutely imperative that the president of the United States come and visit one of these events,” he said. “I believe if he did, he would take some immediate action.”
Greg Schneider covers Virginia from the Richmond bureau. He was The Washington Post's business editor for more than seven years, and before that served stints as deputy business editor, national security editor and technology editor. He has also been a reporter for The Post covering aviation security, the auto industry and the defense industry.