NORTON META TAG

Showing posts with label pro-life hypocrisy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pro-life hypocrisy. Show all posts

26 September 2024

The filibuster is a threat to abortion rights 25SEP24


 AMERICAN women should be the ones who make any and all decisions regarding their individual bodies and that includes decisions regarding reproduction. The only time anyone else should be involved is when a woman ask them to be. Enough of this pro-birth hypocrisy. Please click the link and sign this petition to congress telling them to pass legislation to restore the reproductive rights American women had under Roe v Wade and to have the courage to reform the filibuster if that is what it takes to get this legislation passed. From the ACLU.....

05 June 2022

He Did Not Act Alone An incomplete list of the Uvalde shooter’s accomplices. 26MAI22


THIS is the best response to the gun carnage tolerated by America. Thank you Clara Jeffery and Mother Jones. Share this with family, friends, social media, co-workers, local and national media contacts and send to your national representative and senators as well as your state representative / delegate and senator (I did). 

He Did Not Act Alone

An incomplete list of the Uvalde shooter’s accomplices.

“We don’t know his motive yet, but authorities believe he acted alone”…“it was a lone gunman”…“the shooter acted alone…”

No, he didn’t.

A motive will probably be assigned to him. We have studied every mass shooting since 1982. And the “motives” are usually some combination of the following: He struggled with bullying. Or self-loathing and depression. Maybe he had an ax to grind with an authority figure. Maybe he hated a certain group of people.

But whatever we learn about the Uvalde shooter, or any future ones—because there will be more—don’t say they “acted alone,” which is largely media code for “this doesn’t appear to be Islamic terrorism.” No matter the particulars, these “lone” gunmen all have scores of accomplices. Here is a wholly incomplete list of those who bear direct responsibility in this slaughter of 19 children and two teachers, and the brutality visited on those still in the hospital, all the families, and the community and country at large:

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott: relentless cheerleader for gun extremism, last year he gleefully signed seven bills rolling back gun regulations—including abolishing licenses for handguns. In the aftermath of this shooting he blamed mental health issues, a go-to tactic to distract from the gun debate, despite having cut $211 million from the agency that provides state mental health services.

The GOP-controlled Texas statehouse, which had already passed a slew of laws that rolled back any reasonable gun restrictions—many of which they did immediately after mass shootings, including permitless carry. 

Sen. Ted Cruz, leading recipient of gun lobby money, who now suggests the solution is forcing students and staff to enter and leave through one door. Scholars of military “kill zone” tactics and the Triangle Shirtwaist factory fire beg to differ. 

Sen. John Cornyn, ever content to draft in behind his slightly more venal compatriot, who is making bleating noises about possible compromises he will vote against in the end.

Rupert Murdoch, for translating the El Paso, Buffalo, and Pittsburgh shooters’ screeds into prime-time programming.

Every damn person who works for Fox News now, and really since at least 2010. Like gun manufacturers, they sell fear and grievance to a mostly white male audience. They profit off of hate. And cable companies are their accomplices.

Every politician—looking at you, Elise Stefanik—fueling “replacement theory” hate to raise money and get more Fox air time.

Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, who won’t bring HR 8—requiring universal background checks—to an immediate vote because, he says, people know where their senators stand, and he hopes to reach a compromise bill that can get 60 votes. Charlie Brown, Lucy, football. 

Every member of Congress who isn’t right this minute working to get additional bills to the floor to pass national red flag laws, institute waiting periods, limit high-capacity guns and clips, finally digitize ATF records, permit federal research into gun crimes—any of a dozen commonsense laws that have overwhelming bipartisan public support. No meaningful federal laws have been passed since 20 children and six educators were slaughtered at Sandy Hook elementary, in Newtown, Connecticut.

Every member of Congress and every single one of their staffers who is more concerned with getting home for the holiday weekend than doing something to end the carnage. Especially after they just acted withlightning speed when people peacefully protested at the houses of Supreme Court justices.

The four Democratic senators (Harry Reid doesn’t count) who joined the Republicans to vote against the 2016 ­­Manchin–Toomey compromise bill on background checks. Especially Heidi Heitkamp, who, when asked about her vote on Thursday, told a reporter, “I no longer have to answer your questions.” Nice.

Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema, who will not override the filibuster even to prevent the slaughter of school kids, shoppers, or churchgoers—even for HR 8, which is essentially the bill Manchin championed for years.

Extra points for Manchin telling reporters yesterday that this time compromise talk “feels a little different.” Which he said after ParklandAnd Newtown.

And for Sinema, who said she doesn’t believe that “DC solutions are realistic here.”

Every member of Congress who voted to give gun manufacturers a liability shield in 2005. (Looking at you, Henry Cuellar!) George W Bush for signing it.

Antonin Scalia, for replacing the actual, arcane, mostly insignificant Second Amendment with an entirely invented new one that overrides seemingly everything else in American life.

The high priests of the Beltway “both sides” oracle.

The “thoughts and prayers” crew.

Gun manufacturers and their handmaidens at the NRA, which agreed to the Manchin–Toomey bill back in 2013, but then walked away once it received concessions. 

Vladimir Putin, who, together with his spies, helped bolster the NRA because he saw it as a way to sow domestic division.

Alex Jones. Seriously, fuck that guy forever. Ditto to his anonymous Bitcoin donor. And Ted Cruz for defending him.

Ted Cruz, again, for this.

Trump. Too many reasons to list. Here’s the latest.

Social media companies and streamers that drag their feet about taking down shooters’ videos and rants, and do not invest nearly enough to keep their platforms from fueling the “Columbine effect.”

Everybody pushing lockdown drills and bulletproof backpacks and arming teachers—and other reactive, largely performative measures. Active school shooter drills are shown to deeply traumatize children, and there’s little evidence that they’ve reduced the overall carnage. They certainly don’t prevent school shootings. We should be investing school and community resources in a far more robust and universal “threat assessment” plan to ID troubled individuals, support them, and dissuade them from violent acts.

Every politician and pundit saying more armed cops on campuses is the answer. Uvalde is an utter refutation of the bogus “good guy with a gun” claim, which was only ever about increasing gun sales.

Every politician who declares they are “pro-life” yet are wantonly indifferent to the carnage of their gun policies and positions. They’ll force you to have a child, and then lead that child to slaughter.

Everybody who is tossing their hands up and declaring that nothing will ever change. Yes, the anti-majoritarian Senate and state legislatures are pushing the ideas of an extreme minority onto the rest of us, on this subject and so many others. Yes, there are millions of guns out there already. That only means we have to fight harder, and for longer. But change can come if we are willing to put in the work.

19 November 2018

TAKE ACTION PROTECT WORKERS AND CHILDREN FROM PESTICIDES 18NOV18

Image result for pesticide poisoning
Symptoms of Pesticide Poisoning Sources: National Cancer Institute, National Academy of Science, Office of Technology Assessment, EPA, OSHA

THE drumpf / trump-pence administration, the republican / gop-greed over people party, and their right wing religious supporters claim to be "pro-life". Here is another example of their hypocrisy and your chance from EarthJustice to let our government know you are opposed to the roll back of EPA protections against pesticide exposure and poisonings.  Click the link and remember, adding your comments to the letter always make it more powerful, here is what I added after the second paragraph.....

With this action the hypocrisy of this administration and their right wing religious supporters is exposed again. This "pro-life"  administration and their right wing religious supporters are willing to sacrifice the safety, health and welfare of America's farm workers because the vast majority of them are not white, are poor and many are immigrants, documented and undocumented. The commitment by this administration and the republican party  to corporate America is to increase their profit margins, risk to human life and "pro-life" propaganda be damned. This plan to roll back protections against pesticide exposure and poisoning must be stopped.

TAKE ACTION

PROTECT WORKERS AND CHILDREN FROM PESTICIDES


The farmworkers who help bring fresh fruit and produce to our tables and the people who apply pesticides in our homes and communities aren’t protected by the same safety standards that most workers in the U.S. enjoy. Farmworkers and pesticide applicators face repeated exposure to a range of toxic chemicals.
So when the Environmental Protection Agency announced an updated set of basic life-saving rules in 2015 and 2017, dozens of farmworker, labor, public health and environmental organizations rejoiced. But now the Trump administration has announced plans to reverse these crucial protections against pesticide exposure and poisonings.
From setting a minimum age of 18 for workers who mix, load and apply pesticides; to improving the content and quality of worker safety trainings; to providing farmworkers with anti-retaliation protections and the right to request pesticide-application information, these basic safety standards were put in place to protect the 2.5 million farmworkers in the U.S. who experience 10,000-20,000 reported pesticide poisonings per year, and approximately one million pesticide applicators.
Don’t let the Trump administration put farmworkers, pesticide handlers, their families and the broader public at risk. Tell your elected officials to stop this attack on the Agricultural Worker Protection Standard and the Certification of Pesticide Applicators Rule.

IMPORTANT NOTICES AND RESOURCES

All information submitted with your comment (name, address, etc.) may be placed in the public record for this proceeding. Do NOT submit confidential or sensitive information.
Learn more about our Privacy Policy.
Learn more about the Phone2Action Privacy Policy.

23 March 2017

WHY OUR FOTZE REP BARBARA COMSTOCK R VA 10TH DISTRICT WON'T SAY HOW SHE'LL VOTE ON TRUMP/RYANCARE


SHE won't say because she doesn't care how repealing Obamacare will impact the residents of her district. She is a repiglican puppet concerned about serving her masters in the party hierarchy and the 1% who control them. Think that isn't so, check out who actually contributed to her campaign in 2015-2016 from comstock's open secret's page 

Source of Funds (Campaign Cmte Only), 2015-2016



legend
legend
Individual Contributions About Size of Contributions
 - Small Individual Contributions
 - Large Individual Contributions
$2,911,706
$445,586 (8%)
$2,466,120 (47%)
(55%)
legendPAC Contributions$1,930,020(37%)
legendCandidate self-financing$0(0%)
legendOther$437,901(8%)
8% FROM SMALL INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTIONS, 92% FROM THOSE WHO CAN AFFORD TO BUY POLITICIANS. An ally of fotze rep paul ryan r WI she is dedicated to enriching the rich,  empowering the powerful while disregarding her constituents needs and expectations (as any devote of ayn rand will). It will come as no surprise when fotze rep comstock votes for drumpf/trump-ryancare. This from the +Washington Post .....

  
Rep. Barbara Comstock was not saying Wednesday how she planned to vote on the big legislative question looming before Congress: the GOP plan to remake the Affordable Care Act.
And with good reason. The ­second-term Republican was in the hot seat — she is a lawmaker who represents a Northern Virginia district that voted for Hillary Clinton — but she is also an ally of Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.), the architect of the House bill.
House Democratic Whip Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.) predicted Republicans such as Comstock would face threats from the left in 2018 if they vote for the health-care overhaul and from within their own party if they vote against it.
“We think they may lose their seats if they vote for it, and Trump was threatening if they don’t vote for it they’ll lose their seats,” Hoyer told reporters Tuesday.
For the bill to pass, Ryan can afford only 21 GOP defectors, and as of Thursday morning at least three Virginia Republicans and Maryland’s one Republican were firmly against the bill.
President Trump and Vice President Pence continued to press members of the conservative Freedom Caucus on Wednesday, including Rep. Thomas Garrett, a freshman from central Virginia, who said he remained opposed to Ryan’s bill.
“House leadership, the White House and the band of dissenters are all on the same page of wanting to see the best product possible. We just disagree on what that best product possible is,” Garrett said in an interview.
He would like to see the House pass a straight repeal of the Affordable Care Act with an enactment date, forcing lawmakers to come up with a compromise everyone can agree on.
“Right now the strategy treats the people who have been loyal to the team as enemies and those who have been disloyal as friends,” he said, referring to Republicans who voted for dozens of repeal votes in previous sessions.
Rep. Rob Wittman (R-Va.), a moderate who may challenge Democratic U.S. Sen. Tim Kaine next year, shocked many when he announced last week that he could not support the bill, and he maintained his opposition Wednesday, according to his office. He declined further comment.
Maryland’s only Republican member of Congress, Rep. Andy Harris, is also a ‘no’ vote.
“This legislation simply won’t lower premiums as much as the American people need, and lowering the cost of coverage is my primary goal as Congress and the administration work to repair the healthcare system,” Harris, an anesthesiologist and member of the Freedom Caucus, said in a statement.
Rep. Dave Brat (R-Va.) strongly opposed the bill. Rep. H. Morgan Griffith (R-Va.), also in the Freedom Caucus, has not taken a public position.
Rep. Bob Goodlatte, the senior Republican in the Virginia delegation and chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, is a dependable “yes,” his spokeswoman said.
But these lawmakers come from heavily Republican districts, and their positions do not come at a political cost.
Only Comstock — and to a lesser extent Rep. Scott W. Taylor (R-Va.) — represent districts where a competitive Democrat could conceivably pose a threat. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is officially targeting their districts.
The conservative group American Action Network, aligned with Ryan, is airing ads in Comstock’s district telling constituents to “thank her for fighting for a quality, affordable health care plan. Urge her to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act now,” and then flashes her image and phone number.
Taylor, a Virginia Beach freshman and former Navy SEAL, supports the bill.
“I believe 85 percent of something in the right direction is much better than nothing,” he said in a statement Tuesday.
An earlier version of this story misidentified House Democratic Whip Steny H. Hoyer. This story has been updated.