NORTON META TAG

Showing posts with label cancer treatment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cancer treatment. Show all posts

25 February 2026

Team of Scientists Engineer Bacteria That Could Eat Cancer From Inside Out 24FEB26

 

An illustration depicting cancer cells. | Getty Images

A fascinating article on a possible new treatment to fight cancer being researched and developed by our Canadian friends at the University of Waterloo in Ontario, Canada. This from Newsweek. 

Team of Scientists Engineer Bacteria That Could Eat Cancer From Inside Out

Engineered bacteria that eat tumors from the inside out could provide a new approach in the fight against cancer, report researchers from the University of Waterloo in Ontario, Canada.

The method is designed to exploit a key weakness in solid cancers—the oxygen-free core that forms as tumor cells die and outgrow their blood supply.

The researchers are working with a bacterium called Clostridium sporogenes, which is commonly found in soil and can only survive in environments that contain no oxygen.

The latter makes the center of many solid tumors an ideal place for the organism to grow. Once inside, the bacteria can multiply and begin breaking down and defeating cancerous tissue from the inside out.

The idea builds on long-standing scientific interest in using bacteria to target tumors, but the Waterloo-led team is attempting to solve a problem that has limited earlier efforts.

While C. sporogenes thrives deep inside tumors, it cannot survive near the outer edges, where small amounts of oxygen are present. As a result, the bacteria die before they are able to fully destroy the tumor and finish the job.

The researchers’ solution involves genetic engineering.

They added a gene from a related bacterium that allows Clostridium sporogenes to better tolerate oxygen. This modification helps the bacteria survive longer as they move closer to the tumor’s outer regions, where oxygen levels are slightly higher.

However, giving the bacteria the ability to tolerate oxygen created a new risk. If the gene were active too early, the bacteria could potentially survive in oxygen-rich parts of the body, such as the bloodstream, where they are not intended to grow.

To prevent that, the team turned to a natural bacterial communication system known as quorum sensing. This relies on chemical signals released by bacteria as they grow and multiply. When only a small number of bacteria are present, the signal remains weak. Once the population reaches a certain size, the signal becomes strong enough to activate specific genes.

In this case, the oxygen-tolerance gene is designed to switch on only after a large number of bacteria have already gathered inside the tumor. This timing ensures that the bacteria remain inactive in oxygen-rich environments and only gain their added survival ability once they are safely established within the cancer.

“Bacteria spores enter the tumor, finding an environment where there are lots of nutrients and no oxygen...we are now colonizing that central space, and the bacterium is essentially ridding the body of the tumor," paper author and chemical engineer professor Marc Aucoin said in a statement.

In their earlier work, the researchers demonstrated that C. sporogenes can be genetically modified to tolerate oxygen. In a follow-up study, they tested their quorum-sensing system by engineering the bacteria to produce a green fluorescent protein. The glow allowed the scientists to confirm that the gene activation occurred only when bacterial numbers reached the desired level.

The next step is to combine both advances—the oxygen-resistant gene and the quorum-sensing control system—into a single bacterium. The team plans to test this engineered organism in pre-clinical tumor models to see whether it can more completely break down solid cancers.

If successful in future testing, the engineered bacteria could offer a highly targeted way to weaken or destroy tumors from the inside.

Do you have a tip on a health story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about cancer? Let us know via health@newsweek.com.

Reference

Sadr, S., Zargar, B., Aucoin, M. G., & Ingalls, B. (2025). Construction and Functional Characterization of a Heterologous Quorum Sensing Circuit in Clostridium sporogenes. ACS Synthetic Biology, 14(12), 4857–4868. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.5c00628



04 October 2013

No, the House GOP Isn't Standing Up for Kids With Cancer & Sen. Angus King: Far-right Obamacare opponents 'guilty of murder' 3OKT&30SEP13

THE repiglicans and tea-baggers don't give a damn about cancer patients, children or adults, if they did they wouldn't be opposed to the Affordable Care Act / Obamacare, which makes insurance available to these people and removes the caps on treatment the insurance companies used to be able  to impose to increase their profit margins. The repiglican / tea-bagger obstructionist are only using this as a propaganda tool to try to repair the damage they have inflicted on themselves. This from Mother Jones.......
John Boehner
Step aside, WWII vets; House Republicans have found their newest government shutdown prop: children with cancer. On Wednesday, having caught wind of the news that about 200 patients—including 30 children—would not be admitted for clinical trials at the National Institutes of Health, the House quickly passed a bill to fund the NIH. (It passed similar resolutions for the National Park Service, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and the District of Columbia.) On Twitter, Rep. Steve Stockman (R-Texas) synthesized the new conservative talking points as only he could: "President Stompy Feet now says he'll kill funding for children's cancer treatment. Will the media still cover for him?" On Thursday morning, House Republicans who worked previously as doctors and nurses held a press conference on Capitol Hill to call once more for full funding of the NIH.
But missing from all of this is any explanation of what the Republicans' continuing resolution would actually do: Enshrine the severe cuts imposed on the institute by sequestration. NIH lost 5 percent of its budget—or $1.7 billion—when the cuts included in the Budget Control Act went into effect last spring. It has adjusted by eliminating at least 700 research grants, and slowed down priorities such as developing a universal flu vaccine. As NIH director Dr. Francis Collins told the Huffington Post in August, "God help us if we get a worldwide pandemic." (Making a bad situation worse, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has said it will be unable to effectively monitor flu vaccination programs and virus outbreaks during the shutdown.) In September, Collins suggested that the cuts to research could put "the next cure for cancer" on ice.

None of this should come as news to House Republicans. When Rep. Dennis Ross (R-Fla.) visited a cancer center in his district, he got alecture from researchers, who said the NIH cuts had thrown their budget into flux and made it harder to treat patients. (Ross told the researchers he'd work to restore that missing funding.)
This being American politics in 2013, there's no easy way out for NIH. House Democrats have already said they'd be okay with a "clean" continuing resolution that merely extends sequestration and preserves the steep NIH cuts, embracing the notion that reduced NIH funding is better than no NIH funding at all. Senate Democrats have also signaled that they've accept the lower funding levels in order to end the impasse.
There's another part of the shutdown fight, though, in which the differences between Republican and Democratic positions are quite clear—and the effects much further reaching. It's the Affordable Care Act, a sprawling new law that takes concrete steps to expand insurance coverage, eliminate lifetime and yearly insurance caps, and allow people (including children) with preexisting conditions to enroll in health insurance. The ACA, which in a rare moment of foresight Congress elected to fund separately from the annual appropriations process, is the reason the government is shut down—and the reason it will stay shut down for the near future. There is a battle on Capitol Hill right now over helping sick kids, but it's not the one Republicans are grandstanding about

Reporter
Tim Murphy is a reporter at Mother Jones. Email him with tips and insights at tmurphy [at] motherjones [dot] com. RSS |