NORTON META TAG

Showing posts with label Military Sexual Trauma MST. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Military Sexual Trauma MST. Show all posts

03 March 2014

Sign and send the petition to your Senators: Support victims of military sexual assault 3MAR14

SEXUAL ASSAULT is rampant in the U.S. military, and the chain of command has proven they are not will or able to deal with it in a way that protects the victims and grants them the justice they deserve. The vote on the Military Justice Improvement Act should come up for a vote in the US Senate this week. Click the link to sign the petition telling your Senators they must pass this bill and to do it now.
Here's my short note to my Senators, Tim Kaine D VA and Mark Warner D VA

Senator, please don’t filibuster the Military Justice Improvement Act. There is an epidemic of sexual assaults in the military today and we need real reform to protect victims and prosecute those responsible. 
You both claim to be strong supporters of our troops and vets. Here is a chance to show you DO care about them and not just the profit margins of the military-industrial complex.
There is no good reason to vote against or filibuster this legislation unless you really do not care about the victims of rape. And if you don't care about the victims of rape and sexual trauma in our military then that is a good enough reason not to vote for you in the next election.


FROM Daily Kos Action....
After getting bumped from the Senate schedule last month, a bill offering new protections for victims of sexual assault in the military may be voted on this week.


Sign and send the petition telling your Senators to support this crucial bill.

The numbers are simply appalling—26,000 military sexual assaults in 2012 alone—and the chain of command has repeatedly failed to deal with the problem.

But instead of supporting common sense reforms that would offer new protections to victims, some senators are siding with military commanders—offering milquetoast tweaks to the existing system that has failed time and again.

This problem is WAY too big and we’re way too close to winning to stop now. Your senators could be the deciding vote.

Sign and send the petition now.

Keep fighting,
Michael Langenmayr, Daily Kos

19 November 2013

Justice, once and for all; Tell Congress: Protect Victims of Military Sexual Assault 19NOV13

THE victims of sexual assault in the U.S. Military deserve justice, and the Military Justice Improvement Act will do that. There is a lot of opposition from some in the Pentagon and many, many male members of Congress. We need to let them know we care for and support our troops, and signing this petition will help send a strong message to Congress to get this legislation passed! Please sign and share....

Urge the Senate to pass the Military Justice Improvement Act now. Take action.
The numbers are shocking:
An estimated 26,000 instances of sexual assault in the military took place last year alone; but just 10 percent were even reported, and then only 302 cases were prosecuted.
We've got to change a broken military justice system where one-in-five servicewomen report experiencing unwanted sexual contact, but where survivors are often too scared to come forward because they fear retaliation.
And we must make sure that decisions about prosecuting cases of sexual assault are based purely on the evidence, not on any other factor.
That's exactly what the bipartisan Military Justice Improvement Act will do -- but we need your help to get it passed, and the vote could come in the next 24 hours.
Sign our petition: Join my colleagues and me in urging the Senate to pass the bipartisan Military Justice Improvement Act now!
The problem of sexual assault in the military is not new. Neither are the pledges of "zero tolerance" that military commanders have been making for over 20 years.
Under the current broken system, senior commanders with little or no legal training have the power to decide whether sexual assault cases go to trial or get swept under the rug. And then, even if an assailant is convicted by a judge or jury, those same commanders can overturn the verdict.
It's outrageous, and our servicemen and servicewomen deserve better.
When the Senate Armed Services Committee voted in June to embrace the status quo, rather than embrace survivors of sexual assault, we vowed we wouldn't back down.
Thanks to the support of over 300,000 Americans -- including you -- who stood with us then, we have been continuing to build support for the bipartisan Military Justice Improvement Act. We didn't give up, and now, we're on the verge of voting -- and we need you to make your voice heard.
Join my colleagues and me before this critical vote: Urge the Senate to pass the Military Justice Improvement Act now.
Together, we can ensure that survivors of military sexual assault receive justice once and for all.
Thank you for taking action for our brave men and women in uniform.

09 May 2013

Raped in the U.S. Navy 27APR13 & Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel Talks DOD Sexual Assault Prevention Initiatives 7MAI13

CONTINUING on the matter of Military Sexual Trauma (MST), sexual assault in the U.S. military. Please sign the petition from Trina McDonald, U.S. Navy (ret) calling on Congress to amend the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) to guarantee the victims of sexual assault and abuse in the military are provided protection and receive the justice they deserve. Click the link to sign. Followed by the video of Sec of Defense Chuck Hagel addressing this issue. And see my previous post on this Hearing: Jets Might Have Prevented Mortar Attack on Benghazi Compound &Report on Military's Growing Number of Sexual Assaults Draws Presidential Rebuke & After Emotional Benghazi Hearing, GOP Promises 'Investigation Is Not Over' 7&8MAI13 http://bucknacktssordidtawdryblog.blogspot.com/2013/05/hearing-jets-might-have-prevented.html





Sign the petition

In 1989, I volunteered for the U.S. Navy. I was assigned a duty station in Adak, Alaska. I got there on Valentine's Day, and within two months, I was raped for the first time.
The people involved in my rapes were military police personnel, security personnel, higher-ranking officers—the people that I would have gone to and reported. And so, I have never had the opportunity to actually report it to anyone.
According to estimates from the Department of Defense, 19,000 service men and women are sexually assaulted while serving in the United States military every year. But 86% of them never report their assault—too often because seeking justice threatens their safety, their job security, and their future. 
That's why I created a petition urging the U.S. Senate to ensure that survivors of military sexual assault are not invisible and receive the justice they deserve. Congress must amend the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and move the prosecution of military sexual assault out of the chain of command. 
The petition says:
Only the U.S. Congress can amend the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The U.S. Senate must act swiftly to move the decision to prosecute sexual assault in the military out of the chain of command. Survivors should not suffer retribution for speaking up, and rape should never be an "occupational hazard." Only Congress can change the UCMJ to create a real, working system for prosecuting sexual predators in the military—and ultimately putting an end to military sexual assault.   
Thanks!
–Trina McDonald
This petition was created on MoveOn's online petition site, where anyone can start their own online petitions. Trina didn't pay us to send this email—we never rent or sell the MoveOn.org list.

Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel Talks DOD Sexual Assault Prevention Initiatives




http://youtu.be/JIjWYC6tlt4

Hearing: Jets Might Have Prevented Mortar Attack on Benghazi Compound &Report on Military's Growing Number of Sexual Assaults Draws Presidential Rebuke & After Emotional Benghazi Hearing, GOP Promises 'Investigation Is Not Over' 7&8MAI13

THE PBS NewsHour covered another House hearing yesterday, 8 MAI 13 on the attack on the American consulate in Benghazi last September. They are flogging a dead horse, and it is all for political gain. Watch the video of the "testimony" and you'll notice the the number of Representatives attending and wanting their face time for the cameras. Then watch the video of the Senate hearings on the problem of sexual assault in the U.S. military held the day before, 7 MAI 13, just days after the Pentagon officer in charge of addressing this problem was arrested in Virginia for sexually assaulting a woman in public, in a parking lot. There are maybe two or three politicians at the hearing, all women. THIS is damning evidence that most in Congress could care less about the growing problem of sexual assault of men and women in all branches of the U.S. military, and if they don't care it is doubtful this issue will be addressed with the aggressiveness needed to change the culture that tolerates sexual abuse. 


Hearing: Jets Might Have Prevented Mortar Attack on Benghazi Compound

BY: NEWS DESK
The burnt U.S. consulate in Benghazi a day after the attack. Photo by Gianluigi Guercia/AFP/Getty Images.
Updated Wednesday 3:40 p.m. ET:
Gregory Hicks, deputy chief of mission in Tripoli, Libya, during the time of the 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, testified at a House hearing Wednesday that a second mortar attack on the compound might have been prevented if his calls for jet fighters had been heeded.
There were two waves of attacks on the U.S. facility in Benghazi the night of Sept. 11, 2012, that ended up killing U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.
Hicks said he was told the fighters could reach Libya in several hours to try to fend off attackers, but U.S. military officials later said it would have taken more like 20 hours since the aircraft weren't on alert status. (Read his full testimony.)
Wednesday's House hearing on Benghazi compound assault. 
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/

THE MORNING LINE -- May 9, 2013 at 8:57 AM EDT

After Emotional Benghazi Hearing, GOP Promises 'Investigation Is Not Over'

Describing Benghazi Attack
Gregory Hicks, the former deputy chief of mission in Libya, testifies Wednesday before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. Photo by Jeffrey Malet.
The Morning Line
Last year's attacks on U.S. diplomatic facilities in Benghazi, Libya, have been the subject of presidential debatesa report from an independent review board and on Wednesday, compelling testimony at a hearing of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.
The hearing was fraught with emotion and political theater as Republicans leading the investigation sought to pin blame on President Barack Obama's administration and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
Lawmakers grilled witnesses over what happened in the hours after the attacks that killed four Americans, including Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens. Former Deputy Chief of Mission Gregory Hicks choked back tears as he detailed his surprise at initial suggestions the events of Sept. 11, 2012, had any link to backlash against an anti-Islamic film.
House Republicans who have had five different committees examining the attacks charged in their own report that the Obama's administration "willfully perpetrated a deliberately misleading and incomplete narrative."
The panel's ranking Democrat, Rep. Elijiah Cummings of Maryland, complained about the nature of the queries. He called the hearing part of "a full-scale media campaign that is not designed to investigate what happened in a responsible and bipartisan way" but is instead intended "to smear public officials." Others suggested the new focus on Clinton was more about her possible 2016 presidential ambitions than on seeking answers.
Wednesday's hearing was just the latest in a lengthy battle on the issue between Republicans in Congress and Mr. Obama. The administration's response to the attacks cost Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice a potential promotion to replace Clinton after some Senate GOP lawmakersexpressed concerns about her statements following the events.
Hicks has been dubbed a "whistle-blower." The New York Timessummarizes his emotional testimony:
During a chaotic night at the American Embassy in Tripoli, hundreds of miles away, the diplomat, Gregory Hicks, got what he called "the saddest phone call I've ever had in my life" informing him that Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens was dead and that he was now the highest-ranking American in Libya. For his leadership that night when four Americans were killed, Mr. Hicks said in nearly six hours of testimony, he subsequently received calls from both Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and President Obama.
But within days, Mr. Hicks said, after raising questions about the account of what had happened in Benghazi offered in television interviews by Susan E. Rice, the United Nations ambassador, he felt a distinct chill from State Department superiors. "The sense I got was that I needed to stop the line of questioning," said Mr. Hicks, who has been a Foreign Service officer for 22 years.
He was soon given a scathing review of his management style, he said, and was later "effectively demoted" to desk officer at headquarters, in what he believes was retaliation for speaking up.
White House press secretary Jay Carney dismissed the hearing as "part of an effort to chase after what isn't the substance here."
Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler looked at the details emerging from the hearing and ticks off the facts coming from each side.
On Wednesday's NewsHour, Kwame Holman reported on the hearings. 

Military's Growing Number of Sexual Assaults Draws Rebuke


Published on May 7, 2013
A new Pentagon report finds the official number of sexual assaults in the U.S. military rose to nearly 3,400 in 2012, while up to 26,000 cases went unreported. Ray Suarez talks to Time magazine's Mark Thompson about whether adjudication of sexual assault up the military chain of command affects the number of crimes reported.

http://youtu.be/hc4VfBIR0OI
RAY SUAREZ: The problem of sexual assaults in the nation's armed forces is getting worse, and maybe much worse. The issue drew the national spotlight today and a presidential rebuke.
PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: We're not going to tolerate this stuff, and there will be accountability.

PRESIDENT OBAMA:
 Let's start with the principle that sexual assault is an outrage. It is a crime. That's true for society at large, and if it's happening inside our military, then whoever carries it out is betraying the uniform that they're wearing.
RAY SUAREZ: The news of growing sexual assaults in the military raised the president's hackles at a news conference with the president of South Korea.  
RAY SUAREZ: Mr. Obama spoke as an annual Pentagon study reported sexual assaults in the military rose from just under 3,300 in 2012 to nearly 3,400 last year. But it also found that up to 26,000 cases went unreported.
At a Senate hearing this morning, the Air Force chief of staff, Gen. Mark Welsh, struck sparks with New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, suggesting it's not always a commander's fault if victims don't come forward.
GEN. MARK WELSH, U.S. Air Force: The things that cause people to not report are -- primarily are really not chain of command. It's: I don't want my family to know. I don't want my spouse to know or my boyfriend or girlfriend to know. I'm embarrassed that I'm in this situation.
It's the self-blame that comes with the crime. That is overridingly on surveys over the years the reasons that most victims don't report. And I don't think it's any different in the military. Prosecution rates in the Air Force for this crime ...
SEN. KIRSTEN GILLIBRAND, D-N.Y.: I think it's very different in the military. I think you're precisely wrong about that. Everything is about the chain of command.
RAY SUAREZ: The president said today the military has to exponentially increase its efforts to address the problem. And Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel announced he's issuing new orders to change the culture in the ranks.
DEFENSE SECRETARY CHUCK HAGEL, United States: Together, everyone in this department at every level of command will continue to work together everyday to establish an environment of dignity and respect, where sexual assault is not tolerated, condoned or ignored.
RAY SUAREZ: The Pentagon report came just days Lt. Col. Jeffrey Krusinski, who runs the Air Force unit on sexual assault, was himself arrested for allegedly groping a woman. And, in February, Air Force Lt. Gen. Susan Helms overturned a captain's conviction on aggravated sexual assault.
Now Missouri Sen. Claire McCaskill is holding up Helms' nomination for vice chair of the U.S. Space Command. She spoke at today's hearing.
SEN. CLAIRE MCCASKILL, D-Mo.: The general said, no, no, we believe the member of the military. That is the crux of the problem here, because if a victim does not believe that the system is capable of believing her, there's no point in risking your entire career.
RAY SUAREZ: In response, lawmakers are pursuing multiple kinds of legislation on the problem. One could strip commanding officers of their ability to reverse convictions.
I'm joined now by Mark Thompson, the Washington deputy bureau chief and national security correspondent for TIME and writer of the Battleland blog.
And, Mark, you have seen the reports. You have seen the Pentagon's self-reporting on this. Does that 26,000 unreported assaults a year look like a solid number? Where does it come from?
MARK THOMPSON, TIME: Well, it's an extrapolated number, Ray, from anonymous phone surveys done by the Pentagon of military people. And so it's sort of squishy to begin with.
What's particularly striking about the number, of course, is from 2010 to 2012, that number grew by 35 percent, whereas the hard number, the number of cases that actually were brought forward by people complaining about sexual assaults in the military only went up by roughly six percent from 3,200 to 3,400.
So even though they are getting more reports, those that are unreported are going up even faster.
RAY SUAREZ: Well, a number of unreported cases nine times larger than the number of reported cases ...
MARK THOMPSON: Right.
RAY SUAREZ: ... is that bigger than the service chiefs even realized at first?
MARK THOMPSON: Well, I think, number one, it is bigger than what you see in the civilian world, where the proportion of reported is an order or two bigger than what you see in the military.
But this is not a new problem. This is a longstanding problem. I was on this show 16 years ago talking about it. It remains a problem, what's happening. You have got about 14 percent of the military in uniform that are women, and all of a sudden, with these female senators, several of which we just saw, this is not being able to be ignored by the chiefs, the secretary of defense or anybody else.
It seems like we may have reached a turning point this weekend with the arrest of this Air Force officer.
RAY SUAREZ: Today, at the news conference at the Pentagon, the general in charge of overseeing the management of this problem flipped this on its head in a way and said that part of it is that there's more reporting.
MARK THOMPSON: Yes, I think ...
RAY SUAREZ: So, this is good news, that they're changing the culture.
MARK THOMPSON: Yes, to go back to what I just said, the math shows that it's going up faster in the unreported realm than in the reported realm.
We see this throughout the military whenever there's a bad problem, be it mental health issues, PTSD, anything that has to be self-reported. Whenever the numbers go up, the Pentagon is always very quick to say, it's because we have removed stigma, we have put signs all over the bases and posts encouraging people to come forward.
And I think there is some truth to that, but essentially it remains a huge problem and they're just getting at a bit of it by reducing the stigma.
RAY SUAREZ: And, at the same time, the arrest of the Air Force's senior officer in charge of getting those numbers down, arrested himself during an accused sexual assault.
MARK THOMPSON: Yes, I mean, that is the problem. That's what stunned everybody I spoke to at the Pentagon over the last couple of days.
I mean, a couple of things about Lt. Col. Krusinski's case. He was picked for that job specifically. And people I talk to suggest, well, he couldn't have been -- you know if someone is right for such a sensitive post. The Air Force put him in that post. A lot of people are asking questions about that now.
And we're just going to have to -- the Air Force has asked to take this case away from Arlington County, which is where the Pentagon is located, and prosecute it on their own. We will learn what happens on that score come Thursday.
RAY SUAREZ: You mentioned the female senators. There are also more members of Congress willing to push back on this issue, including a legislative attempt to take the adjudication of these issues out of the chain of the command. What does the Pentagon say in response?
MARK THOMPSON: Well, Sec. Hagel was asked about that today. He doesn't like it. He wants it to stay within the chain of command.
The advocates of change are saying, now, listen, we're not going to take it out of the Pentagon. We're going to keep it in the Pentagon, but it is going to be staffed, for lack of a better word, by a professional force of military sexual trauma advocates, who will be fair, won't be affected, because they won't be in the chain of command of the victim or the accused.
And victims there, advocates believe, will be able to get a fairer shot at their day in court.
RAY SUAREZ: How is this handled in other country's militaries, where they have an even higher percentage of women in the ranks?
MARK THOMPSON: Yes. It doesn't -- it seems to be a particularly -- particularly nagging problem in the U.S. military, just as gays in the military were a big problem here, and it wasn't a problem anywhere else.
I don't know if it's something in the American psyche or something in the American military, but it's a particular combination that has generated this for a long time.
RAY SUAREZ: Mark Thompson, thanks a lot for being with us.
MARK THOMPSON: You bet.
SUPPORT YOUR PBS LOCAL STATION

27 April 2013

U.S. military should put religious freedom at the front 26APR13

RELIGIOUS fanatics will read this as an attack on Christianity, but it is nothing of the sort, a prime example being the officer who was forced to remove the offensive anti religious bumper sticker from his car. What the regulations called for do not do is prevent any person in the US Military, no matter the rank, from practicing their faith. It doesn't prevent anyone from living their faith while being in active service. It doesn't prevent chaplains from preaching their faith during religious services where attendance is voluntary, nor when a service member comes to them for spiritual guidance. WHAT the regulations called for do is call for the US Military leadership, if they are as religious as they claim, to address the issues of sexual assault and abuse and the problem of suicide in the military, both of which are rampant and seemingly ignored by the leadership. The religious leadership should not only live their faith as an example for the troops they lead, they should also use their faith as the moral authority to investigate and prosecute sexual assault and abuse and to demand and obtain the treatment and care of the mentally and physically wounded in their charge to reduce the chances of suicide among those suffering in the ranks. Right now there is too much of 'Do as I say and not as I do' among the religious in leadership in the US Military. These regulations will require them to honor, serve and protect all, no matter their rank. From the Washington Post....
 By Published: April 26
Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel is worried about the Pentagon budget, but there are much more serious issues he must deal with. Religious proselytizing and sexual assault are at the top of the list.
In late March, as reported in the New York Times, Hagel held a conversation with a group of sergeants and petty officers who were concerned about military issues. He told them, “Remember, you always have a friend in the secretary of defense.”
Now is the time for Hagel to step to the plate and prove that friendship by eliminating all discrimination in the military.
“The armed forces are on the verge of falling apart,” Larry Wilkerson, former chief of staff to Colin Powell, told me in an interview. Aside from proselytizing, he said, other problems include “sexual assault, suicides, lowering entrance standards and war weariness. They are in trouble, and the leadership is oblivious.” Sexual assault and proselytizing, according to Wilkerson, “are absolutely destructive of the bonds that keep soldiers together.”
Wilkerson was speaking to me in an interview with former ambassador Joe Wilson and the head of the private Military Religious Freedom Foundation, Mikey Weinstein. They were on their way to a meeting at the Pentagon on April 23 where they would discuss religious issues in a group that included several generals and a military chaplain.
The chaplain’s role, according to Wilson, “is to minister to spiritual needs. You don’t proselytize. It’s a workplace violation.”
Weinstein told me after the Pentagon meeting that military leaders need to understand that “there is systematic misogyny, anti-Semitism and Islamophobia in the military.” He said it is all part of the same culture.
“This is a national security threat. What is happening [aside from sexual assault] is spiritual rape. And what the Pentagon needs to understand is that it is sedition and treason. It should be punished.”
“The chain of command is compliant,” said Wilkerson. “Abuse of power is inimical to all military. Condoning of sexual assault or proselytizing is an abuse of command.” The idea of “zero tolerance,” he said, is “the most mocked phrase in the military. It camouflages a lot.”
The proselytizing they referred to is primarily from “dominionist” or fundamentalist evangelical Christians. Weinstein’s organization has 33,000 clients, and 96 percent are Christian. These clients come to him to complain about having their religious freedom undermined in some way.
The most recent outrage, he said, was reported by a West Point cadet who wrote to Weinstein to say that after the Boston bombings, an active-duty instructor said in class that he would “bet his life on the Muslims having been behind it like they always are. It’s always the Muslims and everyone knows it, and everybody is afraid to say it. Well, I am not.”
That’s just one or many complaints.
●Recently, an Army commander in Europe overturned a jury’s conviction of an officer for sexual assault, despite the fact that the decision was unanimous.
●So called “Jesus rifles,” with gun sights inscribed with Bible quotations, were used in battle by troops. The MRFF fought successfully to have the New Testament passages removed.
●Last year, Marine officers at a U.S. base changed the name of their fighter attack squadron from “Werewolves” to “Crusaders,” with a cross and shield as an insignia. MRFF fought the change after receiving many complaints from Marines. MRFF won, and the squadron is back to Werewolves.
●A chaplain in Afghanistan recently was the target of complaint for sermonizing to troops, including Afghan soldiers, that they had approximately 2,000 days to live and needed to “get right with Jesus.”
●Weinstein even got the military to force an officer to remove an atheist bumper sticker from his car. An evangelical Christian complained about the sticker, which bore a drawing of Satan and a Christian fish.
The stories are legion. Most complainants don’t want to be identified for fear their careers would be destroyed or, worse, for fear for their safety, even their lives.
Weinstein himself once received a letter from the wife of an Air Force sniper who told him her Bible group prayed every day for him to end up in hell on fire and screaming with his friends, “the homos, the muslems [sic] the communists and the leftists. And the gun lovers and the abortionists.”
After demands from Weinstein, the Air Forced published, but has yet to distribute, a 27- page document, which includes a cover sheet that states: “COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY.”
“Leaders at all levels,” the document says, “must avoid the actual or apparent use of their position to promote their personal religious beliefs to their subordinates or to extend preferential treatment for any religion.” It even suggested that noncompliance could result in court-martial.
According to Weinstein, this has not been backed up.
“You need half a dozen court-martials real quick,” Wilson said.
Meanwhile, the complaints continue.
What must stop is the concept that America needs to conquer the world for Christ. An example that Weinstein gave: The Officers Christian Fellowship, in a posting on the Naval Academy’s Web site, promoted the idea of Christian officers exercising biblical leadership to raise up godly military ambassadors for Christ in uniform empowered by the Holy Spirit. “They are trying to create a spiritually transformed U.S. military,” said Weinstein.
The offensive passage was taken down after he complained, Weinstein said.
At the meeting at the Pentagon, according to Weinstein, Air Force Lt. Gen. Richard C. Harding said the instruction booklet, scheduled to be released in a few weeks as a blue pamphlet, will be a panacea to all religious issues.
Weinstein’s reaction? “I said that I don’t want to hear about blue books. What is stopping Secretary Hagel from putting out a letter that this kind of behavior will not be tolerated? Where are the commanders? And [an announcement] that the moment someone goes against the ruling they will immediately be court-martialed?”
The meeting ended on a positive note, according to Weinstein. “I said, ‘What is needed gentlemen, is leadership.’ ”
Which brings us back to Hagel telling that group that they would always “have a friend in the secretary of defense.”
Prove it.
© The Washington Post Company
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/on-faith/us-military-should-put-religious-freedom-at-the-front/2013/04/26/c1befcea-ade2-11e2-8bf6-e70cb6ae066e_story.html?wpisrc=nl_headlines

15 March 2012

Karzai demands U.S. troops leave village outposts; Taliban suspends peace talks with U.S. 15MAR12

AFGHAN president karzai wants American troops withdrawn from villages and confined to operating from main bases. I think it is time to give him what he wants and more. IT IS TIME TO GET OUT OF AFGHANISTAN! No doubt the horrible massacre of 16 innocent Afghans by a rogue American soldier was caused by the stress of repeated deployments and the inadequate treatment of this soldier's TBI and PTSD at Joint Base Lewis McChord. The corrupt Afghan government and most of the Afghan people want the U.S. and NATO to end the occupation of their country. Let's do it. Give them their country and leave them to their own devices. We can end the needles sacrifice of American and NATO lives in a country that doesn't deserve it and use the money saved to provide adequate medical treatment to the tens of thousands of Iraq and Afghan war vets who have been neglected by the Pentagon and VA medical system. Pres Obama, don't send one more American soldier to die in Afghanistan, bring our troops home now! www.rethinkafghanistan.com

By Ernesto Londoño and , Updated: Thursday, March 15, 9:14 AM

KABUL—Afghan President Hamid Karzai demanded Thursday that the United States pull back from combat outposts and confine its troops to military bases, an apparent response to Sunday’s shooting rampage by a U.S. staff sergeant.
Meanwhile, the Taliban said it was suspending preliminary peace talks with the United States because of Washington’s “alternating and ever changing position,” and accused the U.S. of reneging on promises to take meaningful steps toward a prisoner swap.
The announcements followed a meeting between Karzai and U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta in Kabul, after which U.S. officials said the two sides had made progress discussing the contentious issue of nighttime raids--but did not mention any discussion of a pullback.
The latest developments reflect unprecedented strains in the U.S.-Aghan relationship, which reached a low point last month after the burning of Korans by U.S. troops set off a wave of violent protests and retaliatory killings.
Support for the war is slipping both in the United States and among Afghans. Sunday’s massacre of 16 civilians--and the transfer of the staff sergeant suspected in those killings to a U.S. base in Kuwait--further outraged the Afghan people.
The killings, Karzai’s office said in a statement Thursday, have “damaged the U.S. and Afghan relationship.”
Foreign troops in Afghanistan must withdraw from village outposts and return to large NATO bases, the president’s statement said. Karzai also said he wants Afghan troops to assume primary responsibility for security nationwide by the end of next year, ahead of the time frame U.S. commanders have endorsed.
Karzai does not have the authority to enforce a pullback of foreign troops, however. And the United States has rebuffed previous demands that it halt night raids and remove private security contractors from the country.
U.S. military officials tout the night raids on the homes of suspected militants, conducted by U.S. and Afghan special operations forces, as essential to defeating the Taliban insurgency. Karzai has complained that the raids produce too many casualties.
Karzai’s spokesman said in an interview this week that the Afghan government hopes the issue can be resolved through a memorandum of understanding, similar to a recent agreement that laid out the terms for the gradual transfer of detainees held by the U.S, to Afghan custody. Spokesman Aimal Faizi said the Afghan government is insisting that foreign troops be barred from entering Afghan homes and that soldiers obtain search warrants before storming the houses of suspected insurgents.
“There have been very good discussions,” Panetta said Thursday before leaving the country. He said he believes there is a way to “satisfy President Karzai’s concerns and meet our needs as well
Panetta made no mention of Karzai’s pullback request during the news conference. But Lt. Lauren Rago, a spokeswoman for the NATO command in Kabul, said later that the coalition was aware of Karzai’s statement. “This is something that we will continue to discuss through diplomatic channels,” Rago said.
The Taliban announcement that it would suspend negotiations included a statement that it would forgo opening a political office in Qatar, dashing already faint hopes about a negotiated settlement to the decade-long war.
On Thursday, Afghan Foreign Minister Zalmay Rasool was on a visit to Qatar, which the Afghan government saw as a potential breakthrough in asserting a role for the Karzai administration in the talks.
The U.S. Embassy spokesman in Kabul did not immediately respond to a phone call and e-mail seeking comment about the Taliban statement, which was posted on its Web site Thursday afternoon.
The Obama administration has been contemplating releasing five Taliban members held in the U.S. prison in Guantanamo Bay, including four senior members of the militant group. The Taliban’s bargaining chip in the swap has been widely assumed to be Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, an American soldier kidnapped in June 2009.
The Taliban statement said American officials had backtracked on promises to take steps toward as swap, and also had backtracked on an agreement to allow the Doha office to be used for diplomatic purposes.
“With the passage of time, they turned their backs on their promises and started initiating baseless propaganda” that overstated how far along the negotiations were, the Taliban statement said.
The Taliban also took issue with Karzai’s suggestion that his administration was playing a role in the talks. The statement said Karzai “cannot even make a single political decision without the prior consent of the Americans.” It called negotiating with Karzai’s government “pointless.”
The Taliban implied that it would be willing to restart talks if and when the “Americans clarify their stance on the issues concerned and until they show willingness in carrying out promises instead of wasting time.”
The statement concluded by calling on regional countries and other nations to help the Taliban in “expelling the invaders in order to achieve peace and stability in the whole region.”
Panetta, in his visit to Afghanistan, was eager on his trip to highlight the security gains that the U.S. has made over the last year in battling the Taliban, as well as the current Pentagon strategy for gradually turning over primary responsibility for combat operations to Afghan forces by the middle of 2013.
“We are on the right path. I am absolutely convinced of that but the key is to stay on that path,” Panetta said.
But his trip also highlighted the continued turmoil and violence that exists here. As the defense secretary’s plane landed at Camp Bastion on Wednesday, an Afghan translator at the base stole a vehicle and appeared to use it to attack a group of Marines waiting for Panetta on the runway.
Panetta said he had “absolutely no reason to believe” that the attack was aimed at him.
“Whatever happened here was directed at others on the field,” he said. “This is a war area. We are going to have these kinds of incidents.”
The translator was driving a stolen pickup truck, which crashed into a fence. He then apparently set himself on fire, U.S. officials said. The man died of his injuries hours later.
“His burns were extensive,” said Lt. Gen. Curtis M. Scaparrotti, the number-two American commander in Afghanistan. “We don’t know his intent . . . or what motivated him.”
Scaparrotti said the man, who was not armed, had “tried to hit the [U.S. Marines] on the ramp,” but missed them and crashed his vehicle. He struck and wounded a British soldier while stealing the pickup truck.
The incident appeared to be the latest in a string of recent attacks aimed at U.S. forces inside secure NATO bases or Afghan government facilities. Six U.S. soldiers were killed in multiple incidents by Afghan soldiers or police following the burning of several copies of the Koran by U.S. troops in February.
In their meeting, Panetta and Karzai also discussed Sunday’s killings in Kandahar province. The staff sergeant believed responsible has been transferred to a U.S. military facility in Kuwait, despite calls from Afghan lawmakers for him to remain in Afghanistan and be tried under local laws.
Lt. Col. Jimmie Cummings, a U.S. military spokesman in Kabul, said the Afghan government was notified that the United States intended to fly the suspect out of the country, a step he called “routine standard operating procedure when we are preparing to charge an individual and introduce them into the military justice system.” Cummings said he did not know when charges would be filed.
In a briefing before Panetta’s departure from Afghanistan, Scaparrotti told reporters that U.S. troops would likely be conducting combat operations in the more violent areas of Afghanistan into 2014. The Obama administration’s goal is to turn over security responsibility to Afghan forces by the fall of 2013.
“I do believe we’ll still be doing combat operations through 2013 into 2014—although in a more limited nature,” Scaparrotti said. “The east will be the toughest obviously and that is where we will have combat operations going on longer than in other areas.”
Most of those combat operations will likely occur in eastern Afghanistan where enemy forces can often escape across the porous border into Pakistan to train and get supplies.
“I think the greatest threat to the campaign’s success is the sanctuary in Pakistan,” Scaparrotti said. “It allows [the enemy] that regeneration. It allows them to train in safety and it is something that will be difficult to deal with as we move forward.”
Also on Thursday, hundreds of protesters took to the streets in the southern province of Zabul to demand that the U.S. soldier believed responsible for Sunday’s killings be prosecuted in Afghanistan , provincial officials said. They did not appear to know the soldier had been moved to Kuwait.
“They have termed the killings an inhumane act and want the punishment to be carried out inside Afghanistan,” deputy provincial governor Mohammad Jan Rasoulyar said.
Sayed Mohammad Akhund, a lawmaker from Kandahar province, questioned whether the United States was trying to cover up facts about the case. “One person was not behind this,” Akhund said. “It was a formal operation backed by air support. We want all the culprits to be tried in Afghanistan, under Afghan law.”
Mohammad Nayem Hamidzai, another lawmaker from Kandahar, said the soldier’s departure is likely to generate fresh outrage.
“People have been killed with no justification and then burnt,” he said. “They have proved that they are savages.”
The soldier’s unit is from Joint Base Lewis-McChord, near Tacoma, Wash. He will likely face prosecution there if he is charged. A decision on whether to convene a court-martial would be made by an Army general who is in the soldier’s chain of command.
Amid continuing furor over the slayings, U.S. officials showed a base surveillance video of the staff sergeant surrendering to Afghan security guards upon his return to his combat outpost. The video, recorded from a spy balloon floating over the outpost, was released as part of an effort to knock down rumors that other U.S. troops might have been involved.
Panetta, making his third trip to Afghanistan, pledged during his visit that a recent string of setbacks would not force the United States to alter its strategy here.
Maj. Gen. Mark Gurganus, the senior Marine commander in southern Afghanistan, virtually ruled out further restrictions on night raids, which have drawn repeated criticism from Afghan President Hamid Karzai and have been a major stumbling block in talks on the framework of a long-term security relationship.
“I don’t know how much more accommodating we can be with what is a critical element of a counterinsurgency fight,” Gurganus said. All the night raids are being conducted by joint teams of U.S. and Afghan forces, he said.
Speaking to U.S. and Afghan troops at Camp Leatherneck, Panetta sought to tamp down worries about the course of the U.S. war effort after the Kandahar massacre and the Koran burnings, which U.S. officials say was accidental.
“We have been tested time and time again over a decade of war,” Panetta told the U.S. and Afghan troops who gathered in a stuffy tent. “That is the nature of war. . . . Each of these incidents is deeply troubling, and we have to learn lessons from each of these incidents.”
In a departure from past practice, about 200 Marines at Camp Leatherneck were told to set their rifles outside before hearing Panetta speak. Gurganus said he ordered the move out of respect for the two dozen Afghan soldiers who attended the meeting without weapons. “This is not a big deal,” he said.
In Washington, President Obama insisted that “our forces are making very real progress” in Afghanistan, and he reaffirmed a transition plan under which U.S. and NATO troops would withdraw by the end of 2014.
Addressing a joint news conference at the White House with visiting British Prime Minister David Cameron, Obama said, “We’re going to complete this mission, and we’re going to do it responsibly.”
Special correspondent Sayed Salahuddin contributed to this report.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/afghan-who-crashed-truck-near-panetta-plane-dies-from-burns/2012/03/15/gIQAL9LVDS_story.html?wpisrc=al_national#weighIn

08 March 2012

On Int'l Women's Day: Take Action, Reflect, Read this poem 8MAR12

HERE is a moving anti-war poem by Ms Suheir Hammad from the IVAW e mail newsletter, followed by articles on MST (Military Sexual Trauma) and the role women must play in peace negotiations in Afghanistan and all other conflicts...
What I Will
by Suheir Hammad

I will not
dance to your war
drum. I will
not lend my soul nor
my bones to your war
drum. I will
not dance to your
beating. I know that beat.
It is lifeless. I know
intimately that skin
you are hitting. It
was alive once
hunted stolen
stretched. I will
not dance to your drummed
up war. I will not pop
spin break for you. I
will not hate for you or
even hate you. I will
not kill for you. Especially
I will not die
for you. I will not mourn
the dead with murder nor
suicide. I will not side
with you nor dance to bombs
because everyone else is
dancing. Everyone can be
wrong. Life is a right not
collateral or casual. I
will not forget where
I come from. I
will craft my own drum. Gather my beloved
near and our chanting
will be dancing. Our
humming will be drumming. I
will not be played. I
will not lend my name
nor my rhythm to your
beat. I will dance
and resist and dance and
persist and dance. This heartbeat is louder than
death. Your war drum ain’t
louder than this breath.

Another world is possible,

Iraq Veterans Against the War
& the Afghanistan Veterans Against the War Committee
Iraq Veterans Against the WarSupport Our Work: Donate Now

On International Women's Day: Reflect, Take Action, and Be Inspired

The persistance of militarism and the oppression of women (and people who do not conform to strict gender norms) seem to go hand-in-hand. In honor of International Women's Day, we invite you to Reflect on the potential role of women in peace negotiations, Act in support of veteran survivors of Military Sexual Trauma, and Be Inspired to resist militarism by Suheir Hammad's poem, What I Will.

Reflections on why Women must be at the center of peace negotiations in Afghanistan

'Male negotiators sometimes worry that having women participate in the  discussion may change the tone of the meeting. They're right. During the Northern Ireland peace talks, the men would get bogged down by abstract issues and past offences. The women would come and talk about their loved ones, their bereavement, their children and their hopes for the future. These deeply personal comments helped keep the talks focused. The women's experiences reminded the men that it was people who really mattered.' - Anonymous
"Why Peace is the Business of Men (But Shouldn't Be)"
by Ann Jones (originally published by Tom Dispatch.com)
'Looking for a way out of Afghanistan? Maybe it's time to try something entirely new and totally different. So how about putting into action, for the first time in recorded history, the most enlightened edict ever passed by the United Nations Security Council: Resolution 1325?
Passed on October 31, 2000, more than a decade ago, that "landmark" resolution was hailed worldwide as a great "victory" for women and international peace and security. In a nutshell, SCR 1325 calls for women to participate equally and fully at decision-making levels in all processes of conflict resolution, peacemaking, and reconstruction. Without the active participation of women in peacemaking every step of the way, the Security Council concluded, no just and durable peace could be achieved anywhere.'  Read more...

Take Action in support of survivors of Military Sexual Trauma

In partnership with the makers of the film, Invisible War, winner of Sundance's Audience Award, we urge you to sign this petition supporting legislation that would help military sexual trauma survivors receive justice and care. Help this petition reach 10,000 signatures by signing today.
Tweet the petition out to your followers. Here's a sample tweet you can use:
5900+ have shown support for Military Sexual Trauma survivors, will you help @Invisible_War get to 10K? chn.ge/A0UufO

Or post it to your Facebook page:
Support Military Sexual Trauma Survivors and demand Change! Sign and share on your wall: chn.ge/A0UufO

Please encourage folks to join the conversation on Facebook at: Facebook.com/InvisibleWarMovie and Twitter: @Invisible_War and to sign up for the Invisible War newsletter.

In addition, Invisible War is seeking photographs of service members who are survivors of MST for the final credits of the film. Find out how to send your photo here.

Find Inspiration to resist militarism through art and creative expression.

If you are in the Chicago area this weekend, the National Veterans Art Museum is launching the exhibit, Overlooked/Looked Over, a show of art by women veterans that highlights the unique experience of women in war, military service, and as veterans. The curator of this show is Erica Slone, artist, IVAW member, and three-tour Iraq veteran.
To ensure delivery of IVAW emails please add webmaster@ivaw.org to your address book.
© 2010 IVAW 630 9th Avenue Suite 807, New York, NY 10036. All Right Reserved.