NORTON META TAG

Showing posts with label Maghreb. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Maghreb. Show all posts

08 February 2016

المملكة العربية السعودية على استعداد لإرسال قوات برية إلى سوريا 6FEB16 بعد الخبرة المكتسبة في اليمن، وتقول السعودية انها مستعدة لارسال قوات برية الى سوريا [مصعب الشامي / ا ف ب]


المملكة العربية السعودية على استعداد لإرسال قوات برية إلى سوريا 6FEB16

بعد الخبرة المكتسبة في اليمن، وتقول السعودية انها مستعدة لارسال قوات برية الى سوريا [مصعب الشامي / ا ف ب]
السعودية جزيره العرب وإيران، والتوائم الشر بين دول العالم. كلاهما المرتدين، مذنب من إفساد الإسلام للحفاظ على وحشية، والسيطرة القاتلة على شعبهم. وهي التي تصدر بها كاذبة، الاسلام المتطرف في جميع أنحاء العالم عن طريق الإرهاب، والطريقة الوحيدة التي يمكن أن تكسب أنصارا هي عن طريق التحكم في أراضي الناس يعيشون فيه. وليس من عجب أن اللاجئين المسلمين من سوريا والعراق وأفغانستان والمغرب لا يفرون إلى إيران والسعودية جزيره العرب ودول الخليج الأخرى، هؤلاء الناس يعرفون أنه لا يوجد فرق بين إيران، السعودية جزيره العرب ودول الخليج وdaesh / إيزيس (أو أي من غيرها من الجماعات الإرهابية العاملة في مناطق الصراع في العالم الإسلامي) . السعودية جزيره العرب هي واحدة من أسوأ المجرمين لأنهم يدعون أنهم حليفنا في حين طعن أمريكا في وقت الظهر بعد مرة. الأسوأ من الخيانات التي كانالهجوم الإرهابي 11/9 من قبل المواطنين السعوديين ، وحقيقة أن الحكومة السعودية لا تزال تسمح شعوبها، بما في ذلك أفراد من العائلة المالكة، لتمويل الجماعات الإرهابية القتال في سوريا ، والعراق، وأفغانستان، و الجماعات التي تنفذ هجمات إرهابية في أوروبا، وتركيا، وفي جميع أنحاء المغرب. السعودية جزيره العرب وإيران وبقية دول الخليج الغنية يجب أن تكون تلك إراقة الدماء شعوبها، وإنفاق المال بلادهم لهزيمة daesh في سوريا والعراق، وتحتاج إلى أن يقال من قبل الحكومة الأمريكية "نحن القيام به يجري الجيش المرتزقة بك ، قمت بها هذه الفوضى، لتنظيفه "(وأنا أعلم أن الجزء الأخير هو حلم حتى بعد الانتخابات الرئاسية الأمريكية، والمجمع العسكري الصناعي والشركات الأمريكية لا تزال تسيطر على سياستنا الخارجية). هذا من  + قناة الجزيرة الإنجليزية  ......

المملكة العربية السعودية على استعداد لإرسال قوات برية إلى سوريا

بعد المكاسب العسكرية الأخيرة التي شنتها القوات الأسد، الخليج المملكة مستعدة لوضع الأحذية على الأرض في الحرب المتصاعدة في سوريا.

 
المملكة العربية السعودية مستعدة لنشر قوات برية إلى سوريا لمحاربة الدولة الإسلامية في العراق والشام (ISIL) اذا وافق قادة التحالف التي تقودها الولايات المتحدة على هذا العرض.
وقال متحدث عسكري يوم الخميس القوات الجوية السعودية وقد استهدفت ISIL مع الضربات الجوية منذ بدء الحملة في سوريا في سبتمبر عام 2014، ولكن المملكة الخليجية هو الآن على استعداد لتقديم القوات البرية لهزيمة الجماعة المسلحة.
وقال "اليوم، أعلنت المملكة السعودية عن استعدادها للمشاركة بقوات برية مع قوات التحالف التي تقودها الولايات المتحدة ضد ISIL، لأننا الآن لدينا تجربة في اليمن"  وقال العميد أحمد عسيري الجزيرة.
" ونحن نعلم أن الضربات الجوية لا يمكن أن يكون كافيا وأن هناك حاجة إلى عملية برية. ونحن بحاجة إلى الجمع على حد سواء لتحقيق نتائج أفضل على أرض الواقع."
لم عسيري لم يقدم اي تفاصيل عن عدد الجنود المملكة يمكن ان ترسل. 
ومن المتوقع أن تناقش عندما ينعقد الولايات المتحدة اجتماعا لوزراء دفاع دول التحالف من القتال ISIL في بروكسل الاسبوع المقبل العرض السعودي.
وقال لورانس كورب، وهو مساعد وزير دفاع الولايات المتحدة الأسبق، في حين أن دول الشرق الأوسط ومسلحين وزودت المتمردين خلال الحرب الأهلية السورية لمدة خمس سنوات، ووضع الأحذية على الأرض سيمثل تحولا كبيرا.
وأشار إلى أن ذلك قد يشير أيضا إلى روسيا - التي ساعدت إلى حد كبير الرئيس بشار الأسد القوة الجوية  مكاسب كبيرة مؤخرا العسكرية  - حاجة للعودة إلى مفاوضات السلام جنيف التي تم تأجيل هذا الاسبوع.
"تي إن حقيقة أنه سيكون لديك القوات السعودية على أرض الواقع القتال مع المتمردين ضد الحكومة هو تصعيد كبير جدا، ونأمل الحصول على الروس لمحادثات السلام هذه، بدلا من التفكير في أنها يمكن أن تخلق حالة مصغرة العلوية في سوريا وقال "كورب الجزيرة.


أشتون كارتر، وزير الدفاع الأمريكي، رحب بالعرض المقدم السعودي للمشاركة في عمليات برية في سوريا.
وقال كارتر زيادة النشاط من قبل دول أخرى من شأنها أن تجعل من السهل بالنسبة للولايات المتحدة لتسريع حربها ضد ISIL.
واضاف "هذا النوع من الأخبار هو موضع ترحيب للغاية" وقال للصحفيين يوم الخميس.
المملكة العربية السعودية هي متورطة بشدة في المجاورة الحرب الأهلية في اليمن، حيث انها تقاتل المتمردين الحوثيين المدعومين من إيران سواء على الأرض ومن الجو.
المملكة العربية السعودية ودول الخليج الأخرى واعتبر ايران منذ فترة طويلة باعتباره الخطر الإقليمي، والرياض وطهران طرفي نقيض مرة أخرى في الحرب في سوريا واليمن.
 
المصدر:  الجزيرة وكالات
أرسل هذا

06 February 2016

Saudi Arabia willing to send ground troops to Syria 6FEB16

After experience gained in Yemen, Saudi says it is open to sending ground troops to Syria [Mosa'ab Elshamy/AP]
saudi arabia and Iran, evil twins among the nations of the world. Both are apostates, guilty of perverting Islam to maintain brutal, murderous control over their own people. They export their false, extremist Islam around the world through terrorism, the only way they can gain adherents is by controlling the territory the people live in. It is no wonder the Muslim refugees from Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan and the Maghreb aren't fleeing to Iran and saudi arabia and the other Gulf states, these people know there is no difference between Iran, saudi arabia, the Gulf states and daesh / isis (or any of the other terrorist groups operating in the the conflict zones of the Muslim world). saudi arabia is one of the worst offenders because they claim to be our ally while stabbing America in the back time after time. The worst of their betrayals was the 9 / 11 terrorist attack by saudi nationals, and the fact that the saudi government continues to permit their people, including members of the royal family, to fund the terrorist groups fighting in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, the groups that are carrying out terrorist attacks in Europe, Turkey, and throughout the Maghreb.  saudi arabia, iran, and the rest of the rich Gulf states should be the ones spilling their people's blood, spending their nation's money to defeat daesh in Syria and Iraq and need to be told by the American government 'We are done being your mercenary military, you made this mess, you clean it up' (I know that last part is a dream until after the US presidential election, the military-industrial complex and corporate America are still controlling our foreign policy). This from +Al Jazeera English ......

Saudi Arabia willing to send ground troops to Syria

After recent military gains by Assad forces, Gulf kingdom ready to put boots on the ground in Syria's escalating war.

 
Saudi Arabia is prepared to deploy ground troops to Syria to fight the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) if US-led coalition leaders agree to the offer.
Saudi's air force has targeted ISIL with air strikes since the campaign began in Syria in September 2014, but the Gulf kingdom is now ready to provide ground forces to defeat the armed group, a military spokesman said on Thursday.
"Today, the Saudi kingdom announced its readiness to participate with ground troops with the US-led coalition against ISIL, because we now have the experience in Yemen," Brigadier General Ahmed Asseri told Al Jazeera.
"We know that air strikes cannot be enough and that a ground operation is needed. We need to combine both to achieve better results on the ground."
Asseri didn't elaborate on how many soldiers the kingdom could send. 
The Saudi offer is expected to be discussed when the United States convenes a meeting of defence ministers from coalition countries fighting ISIL in Brussels next week.
Lawrence Korb, a former US assistant secretary of defence, said while Middle East countries have armed and supplied rebels during the five-year Syrian civil war, putting boots on the ground would mark a major shift.
He noted that it may also signal to Russia - whose air power has greatly aided President Bashar al-Assad's recent major military gains - a need to return to Geneva peace negotiations that were postponed this week.
"The fact that you will have Saudi troops on the ground fighting with the rebels against the government is a very significant escalation, and hopefully will get the Russians to these peace talks, rather than thinking they can create a mini-Alawite state in Syria," Korb told Al Jazeera.


Ashton Carter, the US defense secretary, welcomed the Saudi offer to participate in ground operations in Syria.
Carter said increased activity by other countries would make it easier for the United States to accelerate its fight against ISIL.
"That kind of news is very welcome," he told reporters on Thursday.
Saudi Arabia is deeply involved in neighbouring Yemen's civil war, where it is fighting Iranian-backed Houthi rebels both on the ground and from the air.
Saudi Arabia and other Gulf countries have long viewed Iran as a regional menace, and Riyadh and Tehran back opposite sides in the wars in Syria and Yemen.
 
Source: Al Jazeera and agencies

20 September 2014

War Is Not the Answer 11SEP14


WAR IS NOT THE ANSWER, and there is a better way to deal with the terrorism of isis and a host of other groups and organizations in the Middle East, Maghreb and Arabian peninsula. Here is My representative's (Rep Gerry Connolly D VA) inadequate response to my e mail to him opposing expanding US Military involvement in Iraq and Syria. He voted to support Pres Obama's war, to support the military-industrial complex and other war profiteers. He voted to sacrifice American lives and our tax dollars. He deliberately lies when he says his isis and the other terrorist groups are a real threat to the security of the U.S. The are a threat to corporate America's profit margins from the business they conduct with the brutal, dictatorial, undemocratic regimes of our false "allies" in these regions. This is followed by Jim Wallis' post on +Sojourners against this march to war.....

September 19, 2014

Thank you for contacting me regarding the threat posed by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) and similarly violent terrorist groups. I appreciate your interest in this issue, and your views are important to me.
The President has laid out a bold and decisive strategy to lead a multilateral operation designed to degrade and ultimately destroy ISIL, and I believe Congress has a constructive and collaborative role to play in this effort. This is a threat the United States must address. ISIL's program of genocide is undermining the stability of Iraq, threatening our partners in the Iraqi Kurdistan Region, and reversing gains made by moderate forces in Syria against a brutal dictator.
In response to the President's consultation with Congress on the deepening crisis in Syria, almost one year ago to the day, I introduced a resolution authorizing the President to carry out airstrikes against the Assad regime. In that instance, Congress demurred. I believe the President will now find bipartisan support in Congress for airstrikes in Iraq and Syria. This tactic has thus far effectively bolstered our partners on the ground, protected American assets, and facilitated humanitarian missions.
I expect a robust debate regarding the plan to arm opposition forces in Syria. It may prove to be the most challenging task we face, moving forward. As the President stated, we must remain vigilant against terrorist threats to America and its allies. As a senior member of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, I will be monitoring this issue closely to ensure that actions taken by the United States are in the best interest of our national security.  
Once again, thank you for expressing your concern on this very important issue. I appreciate hearing from you. For more information on my views on other issues, please feel free to visit my website at http://connolly.house.gov. I also encourage you to visit the website to sign up for my e-newsletter.
Sincerely,

Gerald E. Connolly
Member of Congress
11th District, Virginia

War Is Not the Answer


That was a bumper sticker Sojourners published at the outset of the Iraq war more than a decade ago. American church leaders had not only opposed the war but offered an alternative: "An Alternative to War for Defeating Saddam Hussein, A Religious Initiative." We not only presented it to Colin Powell’s personal council and Tony Blair, but also printed full-page ads in every major British newspaper the day before their Parliamentary debate and vote on the war. The U.K.’s Secretary of State for International Affairs, Clair Short, told me the only real alternative on the table in their Cabinet meetings was “The American church leaders’ plan,” which, she said, was seriously discussed. U.S. and U.K. leaders showed they were drawn to an alternative plan to war that would remove any weapons of mass destruction that Saddam Hussein might have had (which he did not) and even to ultimately remove him from power but without going to war. Pope John Paul II was also opposed to the potential war. Both the Vatican and the American church leaders warned that the potential costs of a war in Iraq could include increasing the scope and threats of international terrorism. ISIS is that sad prophecy come true; the habit of war prevailed.

Sojourners magazine Jan.-Feb. 2003 cover
I have always believed that any alternative to war must still address the very real problems at hand — just in a more effective way. To say that “war is not the answer” is not only a moral statement but also is a serious critique of what doesn’t work; wars often fail to solve the problems and ultimately make them worse. War has to answer to metrics, just as more peaceful alternatives do. The war in Iraq was a complete failure with enormous human and financial costs; ISIS is now one of the consequences.
Yesterday I spoke at a very creative non-partisan conference at the American Enterprise Institute on finding a new approach to end poverty. I was pleasantly surprised when I saw all the press cameras — until I realized they were only there to cover Dick Cheney’s news conference on how America should respond to ISIS in the room next door. Dana Milbank in The Washington Post said:
“It was just like the good old days. Scooter Libby was in the front row. Paul Wolfowitz was in the second. And on the stage was Dick Cheney, beating the drums of war.”
Yet again, Cheney railed against President Obama in a “pre-buttal” to the president’s speech coming that night. Cheney’s strategy, along with others like John McCain and Bill Kristol, calls for serial American invasions and continued occupations in every Middle Eastern country where there is conflict — one after another. Milbank concluded, “In summary: War, war and more war.”
I agree with Pope Francis when he said it is legitimate to stop an unjust aggressor:
"I underscore the verb 'to stop'. I am not saying 'bomb' or 'make war', but 'stop him.' The means by which he can be stopped must be evaluated. Stopping the unjust aggressor is legitimate."
This morning, former National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski agreed, saying the war 10 years ago “was a monumental disaster for which we are still paying.”
President Obama spoke to the “unique brutality” of ISIS, destroying all who are in their path, including children; turning women into sex slaves; perpetrating genocide against religious minorities, including Christians; beheading their enemies,; and turning foreigners into hardened fighters who could bring their terror back to other countries around the world. ISIS clearly revels in its own brutality by eagerly putting it all up on YouTube. I would add religious “blasphemy” to the crimes of ISIS, doing their proud brutal deeds in the name of God — which is an utter offense to all people of faith.
That the world, including the United States, needs to respond decisively to the real threats of ISIS is beyond dispute, but the practical and moral question is — how? Let’s remember the principle that alternatives to war must answer the questions that war promises to answer — but in a better way.
I give President Obama credit for wanting to respond in a “different way” than the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. His strategy will focus on air strikes but also relies on supporting and training Middle East partners on the ground, which will be necessary to defeat a force already as powerful as ISIS.
But who those partners will be is still a huge question at this point. All our potential allies are on one side or the other of the 1,400-year-old Sunni-Shia sectarian conflict, which produces very different visions for the future of the Middle East. Air strikes will always kill innocent civilians, which will fuel the hatred of the outside superpower and be used to recruit more terrorists. And the 1,600 American troops who will soon be in Iraq will have to stand with their “boots” someplace, which will be more likely “on the ground” than in hotel rooms and offices.
To forge solutions to conflict that are an alternative to the endless and failed habits of war demands a much stronger set of other strategies — which the White House has yet to fully understand or embrace. I applaud the president for seeking a multi-national coalition and a more international approach. But that could have begun with the United Nations, where the U.S. will chair the Security Council in just two weeks — rather than taking the American plan to the U.N. for support. Strong U.N. leadership could both recruit more Middle East partners and help take the United States out of the role of the most hated target of Islamic fundamentalism.
Aggressive diplomacy and the willingness to impose crippling economic sanctions are both necessary if we are ever to find alternatives to war. For example, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Emirates have yet to be held accountable — for their enormous inequalities and injustices that have spawned terrorism and for their export of hateful ideologies and funding support for jihadist groups. Stifling money for terrorist groups must extend to any and all nations, businesses, or organizations with any connections to the flow of that lethal money.
Ultimately, we won’t see an end to our “war on terrorism” without dealing with the underlying causes, and not just targeting the consequences of growing terrorism. We must address the world of oil that the West has created, that has literally defined nations, changed geography, and institutionalized the injustices and hypocrisies that breeds the grievances of terrorism. Having justified the unjust structure of that oil world to accommodate our addiction to fossil fuels has produced both a profound threat to our planet and the rise of an angry terrorism that threatens our own children. We must address the fact that 60 percent of the Middle East population is under 30 years of age, and many of them are unemployed, uneducated, aggrieved, and angry young men — too easily drawn to the rhetoric of revenge. To overcome terrorism we must address the grievances that give rise to it and are exploited by hateful extremists.
Again, we must address all of these causes. War and more war will not be able to solve any of it.
Jim Wallis is president of Sojourners. His book, The (Un)Common Good: How the Gospel Brings Hope to a World Divided , the updated and revised paperback version of On God’s Side, is available now. Follow Jim on Twitter @JimWallis.
 

02 August 2013

State Department Issues Worldwide Travel Alert 2AUG13

BY THE BY, if this was a result of the nsa spying on Americans we would have heard about it. One has to wonder if this isn't a 'wag the dog' warning. Still, it never hurts to err on the side of caution. From NPR...
The U.S. State Department has issued a worldwide travel alert because of an al-Qaida threat that is particularly significant in the Middle East and North Africa.
"Current information suggests that al-Qaida and affiliated organizations continue to plan terrorist attacks both in the region and beyond, and that they may focus efforts to conduct attacks in the period between now and the end of August," State said in a statement. "This Travel Alert expires on August 31, 2013."
Of course, this follows the Department of State's decision to close all of its embassies and consulates across the Muslim world this Sunday. , the closures were prompted by intelligence information that pointed to signs of an al-Qaida plot "against American diplomatic posts in the Middle East and other Muslim countries."
The State Department warned tourists that terrorists may attack public transportation systems and other tourist infrastructure.
"Terrorists have targeted and attacked subway and rail systems, as well as aviation and maritime services," the statement read. " U.S. citizens should take every precaution to be aware of their surroundings and to adopt appropriate safety measures to protect themselves when traveling."
Back in February, the State Department because of concerns that al-Qaida might attack U.S. citizens and interests.
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2013/08/02/208255213/state-department-issues-worldwide-travel-alert?utm_medium=Email&utm_source=BreakingNews&utm_campaign=

11 February 2011

Mubarak Steps Down From Power 11FEB11

VICTORY FOR THE PEOPLE OF EGYPT!!!!!! NONVIOLENT PROTEST TRIUMPHS!!!!! This from NPR and then the latest from MOJO's WHAT'S HAPPENING IN EGYPT EXPLAINED blog (link in my favorite blogs section on this blog)....THE video is of the police shooting a nonviolent protester in Cairo on 6 FEB 11, this is why hosni mubarak had to go.

Protests In Egypt

Egypt's President Hosni Mubarak ceded power Friday after 30 years in office, bowing to weeks of mass protests that paralyzed the country. Vice President Omar Suleiman announced the news on state television and said control over the affairs of state will be turned over to the military. "President Hosni Mubarak has decided to step down as president and the higher council of the armed forces will run the affairs of the country," Suleiman said in a brief statement.

Egyptian anti-goverment demonstrators flood Cairo's landmark Tahrir Square early Friday.
Pedro Ugarte/AFP/Getty Images
Egyptian anti-goverment demonstrators flood Cairo's landmark Tahrir Square early Friday.
The moment the announcement was made, Cairo's Tahrir Square erupted in celebration. People ran through the streets hugging each other and shouting, "Egypt is free!" and "The people have brought down the regime!"
"This is the greatest day of my life. The country has been liberated," opposition leader Mohamed ElBaradei told The Associated Press.
The ruling National Democratic Party also has been dissolved and the recently appointed general-secretary of the party, Hossam Badrawi, has resigned.
Badrawi told al-Hayat TV that his was "a resignation from the position and from the party."
"The formation of new parties in a new manner that reflects new thinking is better for society now at this stage," he said.
Mubarak left Cairo on Friday as hundreds of thousands of enraged protesters swarmed across the capital and other major cities in Egypt demanding his resignation.
A local government official told The Associated Press on Friday that Mubarak was in the Egyptian seaside resort of Sharm el-Sheikh, some 250 miles from Cairo, where he has a palace.
Reports of the president's resignation came hours after the Egyptian military said it would support Mubarak's decision to remain in office through September elections.
The Armed Forces Supreme Council released a statement Friday endorsing the plan Mubarak unveiled Thursday night for constitutional changes and presidential elections and for transferring some powers to Vice President Omar Suleiman. The council also guaranteed that Egypt's hated emergency laws, imposed when Mubarak took power after the 1981 assassination of Anwar Sadat, would be lifted "immediately after the end of the current circumstances" — a reference to the mass protests.
The military also called for public services to resume and urged "the return of normal life in order to safeguard the achievements of our glorious people."
'We Expected The Army's Decision'
Undaunted, protesters streamed into Tahrir Square in central Cairo for what was expected to be the largest demonstration yet in weeks of anti-government displays. Crowds of protesters also gathered outside parliament, the headquarters of state television and at the presidential palace.
"We expected the army's decision; we always knew that it was behind Mubarak. But we know it's not going to harm us," Safi Massoud said as she joined thousands of people packed into the square.
"We won't leave until we choose a transition president. We don't want Mubarak, we don't want Suleiman," she said.
The statement from the military cleared up uncertainty over where its loyalties lie after seemingly conflicting statements issued by Mubarak's Cabinet and his generals a day before. The council announced Thursday that it had stepped in to secure the country, and a senior commander told crowds in Cairo that "all their demands" would be met, swelling hopes that Mubarak would go.
Maha Azzam, a fellow at the London-based think tank Chatham House, said it appeared that the military and Cabinet "weren't acting with one voice."
"There were mixed signals, and the United States got those mixed signals as well," Azzam told NPR. "We were all led to believe that there would be some radical change and that Mubarak would step down."
Hundreds of thousands of people across Egypt had watched Mubarak's speech in disbelief and anger as he refused to step down and made the symbolic gesture of handing over some authority to Suleiman. His defiant stance only emboldened the protesters, energizing their call for a "march of millions" Friday.
Protesters Mobilize In Cairo

.
Tens of thousands of anti-government protesters marched in Alexandria, Egypt's second-largest city, on Friday.
Tarek Fawzy/AP
Tens of thousands of anti-government protesters marched in Alexandria, Egypt's second-largest city, on Friday.
About 2,500 demonstrators assembled outside the gate of Mubarak's Oruba Palace on Friday, and more than 10,000 tore apart military barricades in front of the State Television and Radio building. The palace was protected by four tanks and rolls of barbed wire, but soldiers were doing nothing to stop people from joining the rally and chanting anti-Mubarak slogans.
Outside the palace, the words "You will be tried" were written in chalk.
"They are really trying to push out into other parts of the city … to up the ante," NPR correspondent Lourdes Garcia-Navarro said, reporting from Tahrir Square.
Others massed outside the Cabinet, parliament and the state TV headquarters several blocks away from Tahrir Square, the center of the mass rallies that began Jan. 25.
Hundreds of demonstrators formed a human barricade around the building that houses state TV and radio, checking IDs and turning away those who work there. Tanks and barbed wire surrounded the building overlooking the Nile, but troops did not keep protesters away.
Soldiers on the streets took no action to stop the demonstrators, indicating they were trying to avoid another outbreak of violence.
In Egypt's second-largest city, Alexandria, NPR's Corey Flintoff said "tens of thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands" were peacefully marching along a main boulevard that snakes along the Mediterranean seaside. Many waved Egyptian flags or carried banners and hand-lettered signs calling for Mubarak to leave.
"We understand, too, that a great many people have gone to Cairo to join the protests in Tahrir Square," Flintoff said.
Anxiety Mounts Across The Middle East
As Egypt braced for Friday's show of rage over Mubarak's speech, the Middle East's unease was mirrored in editorials in Arab newspapers. Egypt's revolution hangs in the balance, was the theme in a Lebanese paper, Egypt's stability will very likely be tested again, from an editorial in a Dubai newspaper.
The uprising in Egypt has already had a profound effect across the region, even seeming to inspire unusual public protest in Saudi Arabia. Despite Mubarak's defiant stance, his announcement did signal the end of one-man rule in Egypt. In a region of autocrats, that is a powerful symbol.
In Thursday night's speech, Mubarak called protesters' demands legitimate and promised that September presidential elections, in which he says he will not run, will be "free and fair," with supervision to ensure transparency.
Mubarak said that on the recommendation of a panel of advisers, he had requested the amendment of five articles of the constitution to loosen the rules on who can run for president, to restore judicial supervision of elections and to impose term limits on the presidency.
He also annulled a constitutional article that gives the president the right to order a military trial for civilians accused of terrorism. Mubarak said this step would "clear the way" for eventually scrapping the emergency law but with a major caveat: "once security and stability are restored."
The emergency law gives police virtually unlimited powers of arrest.
The Muslim Brotherhood, Egypt's largest and best organized opposition group, called the speech a "farce."
"This is an illegitimate president handing power to an illegitimate vice president," said Mohammed Abbas, who represents the Brotherhood's youth wing. "We reject this speech, and we call on Mubarak to step down and hand his powers to the army."
ElBaradei, who has emerged as a leader of the opposition, sent a chilling tweet Thursday night, writing, "Egypt will explode. Army must save the country now."
Another opposition figure, Google executive Wael Ghonim, called for caution. "The situation is complicated. I don't want the blood of the martyrs to be wasted and at the same time I don't want to see more bloodshed," he said in comments posted on Facebook.
President Obama appeared dismayed by Mubarak's announcement. He said in a statement that it was not clear that an "immediate, meaningful" transition to democracy was taking place and warned that too many Egyptians are not convinced that the government is serious about making genuine change.
Aaron David Miller, a scholar at the Woodrow Wilson International Center, told NPR that the impasse in Egypt leaves the U.S. in "the worst of all possible worlds — with grand expectations and supporting very important values, but without the capacity and leverage to implement a preferred American outcome or even an outcome in Egypt that we can control."
NPR's Lourdes Garcia-Navarro, Soraya Sarhaddi Nelson and Eric Westervelt in Cairo; Corey Flintoff in Alexandria; and Deborah Amos in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, contributed to this story, which contains material from The Associated Press.
 
  • Middle East
     
  • Anti-Government Protests Roil Egypt
     
 
The Egyptian president's speech surprised and confused many — various interpretations didn't help.

Anti-Government Protests Roil Egypt

Mubarak's Message: A Matter Of Interpretations

The Egyptian president's speech surprised and confused many — various interpretations didn't help.
UPDATE 171, Friday, Feb. 11, 10:15 a.m. EST/5:15 p.m. Cairo: Welcome to Day 18. Protests continue. Mubarak's still in power. What's the latest?
  • Mubarak has reportedly left Cairo, but that's unconfirmed and, as The Nation's Greg Mitchell points out, "may not mean much."
  • Another "important" announcement is expected shortly from the Egyptian government. No word yet on what that might be.
  • US military aid paid for Mubarak's yacht repairs.
  • James Clapper, the director of national intelligence, said some nice (and mostly correct) things about the Muslim Brotherhood yesterday, and America's right wing flipped out. The American Prospect's Adam Serwer has the story.
  • Speaking of the Muslim Brotherhood, we have an explainer out (by Bob Dreyfuss) about the group: What Is the Muslim Brotherhood, and Will It Take Over Egypt?
UPDATE 172, Friday, Feb. 11, 11:15 a.m. EST/6:15 p.m. Cairo: Egyptian VP Omar Suleiman just appeared on state television to announce that Mubarak has stepped down and handed power to a military council. (We have more on Suleiman: Who is Omar Suleiman?) "Wild cheers" erupted in Cairo's Tahrir square, according to CNN. "This is the greatest day of my life. The country has been liberated," said opposition figure Mohamed ElBaradei. Ayman Mohyeldin, an Al Jazeera correspondent, said that for many, a "dream has become a reality." Here's what it looked like:

And here's an interesting/amusing post from counterinsurgency guru and think-tanker Andrew Exum:
Thus far, all of the focus on Egypt has been on winning the day: making sure the administration does not appear to be caught lagging behind momentum. But a better strategy would be —
HOLY %$#@, as I write this, Hosni Mubarak resigns!!! Holy la vache qui %$#@ing rit.
— figuring out how we want this to end. Do we want a transitional government? Do we want a Turkey-style republic? Figure that out, and we can then figure out what needs to happen for that to take place -- and how we can support the process. Maybe it's election monitors, maybe it's through constitutional lawyers, maybe it's through more aid for the military. But figure out where we want Egypt to go. I don't see that yet from the administration.
It's not over yet.
UPDATE 173, Friday, Feb. 11, 11:30 a.m. EST: Here's the full text of Suleiman's statement, via the BBC:
In the name of God the merciful, the compassionate, citizens, during these very difficult circumstances Egypt is going through, President Hosni Mubarak has decided to step down from the office of president of the republic and has charged the high council of the armed forces to administer the affairs of the country. May God help everybody.
Nick Baumann covers national politics and civil liberties issues for Mother Jones' DC Bureau. For more of his stories, click here. You can also follow him on twitter. Email tips and insights to nbaumann [at] motherjones [dot] com. Get Nick Baumann's RSS feed.
Siddhartha Mahanta is an editorial fellow at Mother Jones. Got story ideas? Email him at smahanta (at) motherjones (dot) com. For more of his stories, click here. Get Siddhartha Mahanta's RSS feed.

03 February 2011

HUMAN RIGHTS & THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS from HUMANRIGHTS.COM

AN IMPORTANT MESSAGE FOR ALL OF US, AND ESPECIALLY FOR THOSE NATIONS NOW EXPERIENCING ACTIVE STRUGGLES TO REALIZE THEIR HUMAN RIGHTS.....a link to the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights office has been added to this blog in the My Favorite Sites section....
 

On December 10, 1948 the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted and proclaimed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights the full text of which appears in the following pages. Following this historic act the Assembly called upon all Member countries to publicize the text of the Declaration and "to cause it to be disseminated, displayed, read and expounded principally in schools and other educational institutions, without distinction based on the political status of countries or territories."

Useful Links

PREAMBLE

Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,
Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people,
Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law,
Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations,
Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,
Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in co-operation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms,
Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge,
Now, Therefore THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY proclaims THIS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction.

Article 1.

  • All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.

Article 2.

  • Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.

Article 3.

  • Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.

Article 4.

  • No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.

Article 5.

  • No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

Article 6.

  • Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.

Article 7.

  • All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.

Article 8.

  • Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.

Article 9.

  • No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.

Article 10.

  • Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.

Article 11.

  • (1) Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.
  • (2) No one shall be held guilty of any penal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the penal offence was committed.

Article 12.

  • No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

Article 13.

  • (1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state.
  • (2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.

Article 14.

  • (1) Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution.
  • (2) This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely arising from non-political crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 15.

  • (1) Everyone has the right to a nationality.
  • (2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality.

Article 16.

  • (1) Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.
  • (2) Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses.
  • (3) The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.

Article 17.

  • (1) Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others.
  • (2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.

Article 18.

  • Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.

Article 19.

  • Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

Article 20.

  • (1) Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.
  • (2) No one may be compelled to belong to an association.

Article 21.

  • (1) Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.
  • (2) Everyone has the right of equal access to public service in his country.
  • (3) The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.

Article 22.

  • Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality.

Article 23.

  • (1) Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.
  • (2) Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work.
  • (3) Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection.
  • (4) Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.

Article 24.

  • Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay.

Article 25.

  • (1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.
  • (2) Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.

Article 26.

  • (1) Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit.
  • (2) Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace.
  • (3) Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.

Article 27.

  • (1) Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits.
  • (2) Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is the author.

Article 28.

  • Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.

Article 29.

  • (1) Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.
  • (2) In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.
  • (3) These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 30.

  • Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.
  • http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml