NORTON META TAG

05 November 2010

Banks and Populism 4NOV10 from MOJO

REPUBLICORP'S TAKEOVER OF THE GOVERNMENT BEGINS...This should not be a surprise to anyone, after all, gop and tea-bagger supporters voted to protect the shareholders of the banks and financial institutions of wall street, didn't they? See my earlier postings on this blog, 'ARE THE TEA PARTIERS BEING TAKEN FOR A RIDE?' 30OKT10, 'REPUBLICORP, BUYING DEMOCRACY ONE RACE AT A TIME' 23OKT10, 'OFFICIAL REPUBLICORP MERGER' 12OKT10. This from MOJO.....
Spencer Bachus, who's likely to be the new chairman of the House financial services committee, wants to go through the financial reform bill "page by page" and gut its toughest provisions, including the Volcker rule, which bans proprietary trading. The Financial Times explains:
Underlining the change in Congress, Mr Bachus, who as ranking Republican on the committee could replace Barney Frank as chairman of the panel, expressed concern that shareholders of Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase will be hurt because the banks will be less profitable.
Kudos for honesty, I guess. No shilly shallying here about how this is bad for consumers or bad for America or anything like that. It might hurt Goldman Sachs shareholders, so the Volcker Rule has to go.
This is one of the great political triumphs of our day. Right-wing opposition to healthcare reform I get. Liberals and conservatives have been fighting over national healthcare for a century. But opposition to modest banking reform? In the wake of the most catastrophic financial failure since the Great Depression? It's mind boggling. Somehow, all those tea partiers who are mad as hell at Wall Street and aren't going to take it anymore have been persuaded to believe that financial reform is a gigantic socialist/statist conspiracy to....what? I'm not even sure. But they're mad about it and think Bachus is doing the Lord's work by trying to repeal it. If you ever needed any evidence that the tea party movement is largely in thrall to all the usual Republican power centers, this is it. How else can you explain why a plumber in Dubuque is convinced that a bill to rein in Wall Street excesses is really a socialist ruse to allow Barack Obama to take over the banks?

04 November 2010

Red Meat: Vanity Fair’s Official 2010–11 Republican Beefcake Calendar

Red Meat
CLICK THE HEADER OF THIS POST OR THE LINK BELOW TO GO TO VANITY FAIR TO SEE THE CALENDAR ON THEIR SITE, ALSO HAVE IT ON A PAGE ON THIS BLOG!
 
In December 2008, a widely disseminated photograph of President-Elect Barack Obama emerging from the Hawaii surf in a bathing suit aroused convulsions of enthusiasm across the land. Even the New York Post joined in, catcalling, “Fit for Office … Buff Bam Is Hawaii Hunk!” But a mere two years later—two economically desolate, war-torn, jobless years later—the national sentiment toward Obama has wilted, with open-mouthed adoration giving way to libido-crushing frustration. Far, far sexier than the president and his drooping poll numbers are the crusading challengers of the Republican Party, whose tea-swilling followers are fogging up the windows of the 2010 midterm elections. If Obama’s a shipwreck, the 13 bare-chested men of Red Meat: Vanity Fair’s Official 2010–11 Republican Beefcake Calendar are total dreamboats. Ahoy!

Obama Doubles Down On 'Civility' In Somber Post-Election Remarks 3NOV10

PRESIDENT Obama is wasting his time looking for bipartisanship with the gop and their tea-bagger allies in Congress. Their leadership has already publicly announced their intentions to limit the president to one term, and so it is obvious they have no plans to work with him and the Democrats in Congress on anything. They will continue their obstructionist tactics, coupling them with their vicious, deceptive, fear-mongering propaganda machine to the detriment of all Americans, and then blame President Obama and the Democrats for the decline of the nation. The president, the Democratic party and progressives need to address these tactics head on. No more granting anonymity to any senator placing a hold or filibuster on legislation....tell the American people who is responsible for holding up legislation. No more compromising with gop / tea-baggers in Congress on core Democratic principles to get legislation passed....after all, the past two years have shown the gop / tea-baggers offered ideas and amendments to legislation, some were accepted and incorporated in legislation that was passed only to see the vast majority of the gop legislators vote against the legislation and then use it against the Democrats and President Obama in the mid-term elections. That is not bipartisan governing, and the president and Democrats in Congress and the American people can not afford to be played like that again. 
WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama took the Democratic Party's midterm election drubbing in stride during a press conference on Wednesday, insisting that the message sent was not dissatisfaction or contentment with either political party but frustration over the state of the economy.
"It feels bad," he admitted, when asked about the GOP landslide.
The president took "direct responsibility" for the fact that "people across America aren't feeling" economic progress. And he pledged to push forward with a legislative agenda that would alleviate their concerns.
But the defining feature of his remarks was his re-commitment to the notions of post-partisan dialogue, collaboration and what he called "civility."
"No one party will be able to dictate where we go from here. We must find common ground in order to make progress on some uncommonly difficult challenges," Obama said. "I do believe there is hope for civility. I do believe there is hope for progress and that's because I believe in the resiliency of a nation that has bounced back from much worse than what it is going through right now."
It was the type of rhetorical touch that defined Obama's presidential campaign as well as his first two years in office. It's also a posture that has been resoundingly rejected by the Republican Party, which ran successfully on straight opposition to the president's agenda.
For those watching, the words seemed to ring a bit hollow. Even the president himself seemed skeptical about the practicality of his pledge.
"There is a reason we have two parties in this country and both Democrats and Republicans have certain beliefs and principles that they believe should not be compromised," Obama said. The country, he added, cannot "spend the next two years re-fighting the political battles of the last two," though even that basic sentiment was nuanced with an addendum: "I'm not so naïve to think everybody will put politics aside till then."
Politics, indeed, seems more animated now than at any time in the Obama presidency. Incoming House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) declared that compromise with the White House will only come if Obama changes course. And a week before the 2010 elections took place, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) stressed that his number-one priority was to ensure that the president only serve a single term.
When pressed on what issues, if any, he thought he could find middle ground with Republicans, Obama struggled for specifics. He talked about the bipartisan deficit commission, which he had set up and whose proposals are set to be unveiled later in the year. He mentioned re-investments in infrastructure (a typical bipartisan prescription). "We should be able to agree now that it makes no sense for China to have better rail systems then us," he said.
Mainly, however, Obama's suggestions of where to find political civility were small-bore stuff. He noted various aspects of health care reform law, including some of the more administrative features, that could use tinkering, and then reiterated a piece of bipartisan agreement that he wants to continue.
"Eric Cantor said today he wants to see a moratorium on earmarks continue," said the president. "That's something we can work on together."
"I think I have been willing to compromise in the past and I will be willing to compromise going forward," he summarized, vaguely.

03 November 2010

What this election means FROM THE NRDC ACTION FUND 3NOV10

THE election results leaves the nations environment at risk from big oil, big coal, corporate America's greed and from the gop and tea-baggers in local, state and federal governments. Please sign the pledge to support the NRDC Action Fund with participation in actions and financially.....click the link below.

NRDC Action Fund - Peter Lehner



NRDC Action Fund: Mobilizing America for a Sustainable Future


Take Action Now! Today, riding the momentum of economic anger, a wave of newly elected climate deniers will start rolling into Washington. They will attack the safeguards that keep our air and water clean, try to obstruct progress against climate change and attempt to hand our most precious natural places over to greedy energy companies to despoil.

But they don't represent the views of the American people, and we have to make sure they don't succeed.

Polling from across the country shows that Americans overwhelmingly support clean energy policies and comprehensive efforts to protect our air and water.1 And in California, voters resoundingly rejected Proposition 23, a move by Texas oil companies to roll back California's clean energy and climate law. Its defeat is great news: given the chance, voters supported clean energy priorities by a large margin -- and elected leaders are taking notice.

This election was not about clean energy or the environment. So we need to start right now, today, to show Congress that the public wants to move forward on clean energy. Our elected leaders should not listen to the most extreme new members and the shadowy interests that support them.

Take action today: send this link to your friends using email, Facebook or Twitter:

The election has helped climate deniers gain power, but I'm not going to be silent. Sign this pledge and join me in defending clean energy jobs and strong protections for our air and water: http://nrdcactionfund.org/pledge/cev

By reaching into their deep pockets, Big Oil, Big Coal and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce will continue to promote an agenda that would deepen our addiction to dirty fossil fuels and corrupt our natural areas. Which is why we must keep fighting.

We need to stand up to those whose extremism is out of step with America, and to make sure the voice of our movement is heard loud and clear in Washington. If we don't speak up, the vocal minority will dominate the public discourse, and we will pay the price.

Urge your friends to stand with us by sending them this text using your email, Facebook or Twitter:

The election has helped climate deniers gain power, but I'm not going to be silent. Sign this pledge and join me in defending clean energy jobs and strong protections for our air and water: http://nrdcactionfund.org/pledge/cev

You, and Americans like you, can control the agenda in Washington.

Thank you for standing with us.

Sincerely,

Peter
Peter Lehner
Executive Director
NRDC Action Fund
1. http://www.nrdcactionfund.org/blog/Voters-Overwhelmingly-Support-Clean-Energy-Candidates.html
TAKE ACTION FOLLOW US
Facebook Twitter YouTube Flickr Stumble Upon Delicious Digg RSS Feeds

Senators Protest Proposed Pipeline 1NOV10 FROM MOJO

SEE my earlier post on this blog on the action being taken by the National Wildlife Federation opposing the pipeline (STOP KEYSTONE XL 22OKT10), send a message to Sec. Clinton by clicking this link 
http://bit.ly/bIGiSz
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said recently that a controversial pipeline that TransCanada hopes to build from Alberta to Texas is likely to be approved, even though a full analysis of its impacts has yet to be completed. Her remarks didn't sit well with ten senators, who on Friday blasted the proposal and urged Clinton in a letter to reject "dirty oil" from Canada's tar sands.
"Approval of this pipeline will significantly increase our dependence on this oil for decades," the senators wrote. "We believe the Department of State (DOS) should not pre-judge the outcome of what should be a thorough, transparent analysis of the need for this oil and its impacts on our climate and clean energy goals."
The signatories to the letter were: Sens. Pat Leahy (D-Vt.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ), Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Robert Menendez (D-NJ), Kristen Gillibrand (D-NY), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Roland Burris (D-Ill.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), and Ben Cardin (D-Md.). Because the pipeline would cross international boundaries, the State Department has the final say on whether it will be built.
The proposed TransCanada Keystone XL pipeline expansion would run 1,661 miles from Alberta to Nederland, Texas. A decision about the project isn't expected until early 2011, but Clinton said in an October 15 speech that, while the State Department has "not yet signed off on it…we are inclined to do so." Yet the pipeline remains highly controversial; oil from the tar sands has a carbon footprint two to three times higher than conventional fuels. The XL expansion pipeline would have the capacity to bring 510,000 barrels of oil from the tar sands to the US each day.
The pipeline has also been criticized in the states it would cross, particularly Nebraska, where it would bisect a major aquifer. Given the recent history of oil spills and pipeline accidents in the US, folks in the path of the pipeline are growing increasingly concerned about the possibility of a spill in their area. Clinton's remarks also drew ire from both of Nebraska's senators, Mike Johanns (R) and Ben Nelson (D), who have raised concerns about the proposed path of the pipeline.
In the letter, senators outline a long list of questions about the proposal, including inquiries about how much it would increase greenhouse gas emissions in the US, whether it would increase output from Canada's tar sands, and whether there is adequate response capability should an accident occur. The full letter is posted here.
Advertisement

And 2010's Biggest Winner Is…from MOJO 2NOV10

Dark money, shadowy groups, and secret millionaires.
One result of the 2010 campaign is clear before any ballots are counted: Democracy is in danger.
That sounds hyperbolic. But whatever remains of the quaint notion—call it a myth—that in a democracy citizens are more or less equal is in the process of being shredded, due to the rise this year of super PACs and secretive political nonprofits. Thanks to the Supreme Court's notorious Citizens United decision and other rulings, a small number of well-heeled individuals (or corporations or unions) can now amass a tremendous amount of political influence by throwing an unlimited amount of money into efforts to elect their preferred candidates. And certain political nonprofits, such as Crossroads GPS—the outfit set up this year by GOP strategists Karl Rove and Ed Gillespie (which with an affiliated group is spending about $50 million)—can pour tens of millions of dollars into the elections without revealing the source of their campaign cash.
The secret and unlimited flow of dollars into congressional campaigns this year is largely unprecedented—at least since campaign finance reform was implemented following Watergate in the 1970s. Almost half a trillion dollars have been spent so far by outside groups—with about one-quarter of that coming from dark-money groups that don't disclose donors. And it's not just a Republican phenomenon. Unions and Democratic-leaning advocacy outfits are playing the game. Still, the advantage goes to the GOP. Of the outside groups not connected to either political party, those supporting Republicans and opposing Democrats have so far spent $119.2 million, and those supporting Democrats and opposing Republicans have dumped $73.8 million into races. This split is dramatic, but there's another factor to consider: Much of the pro-Democratic money comes from large membership groups (including the SEIU and the National Education Association), yet much of the pro-Republican money originates from a small number of millionaires (or billionaires). Consequently, fat cats have gained even more disproportionate influence.
The White House has complained about the rise of super PACs and the spread of secret money, though it miscalculated by focusing on the possible flow of foreign money into these endeavors—blasting the Chamber of Commerce's pro-Republican efforts—when the issue is the overall boost in special interest money. And here's the kicker: The 2010 campaign is merely a warmup for 2012 and campaigns after that.
It doesn't take a New York Times article—such as the one headlined "Conservative Donor Groups Lay a Base for 2012 Elections"—to predict what's coming. The permanent, neverending campaign will become even more permanent and neverending. These big-and-secret-money groups will be working 24/7, opposing and discrediting President Barack Obama and the Democrats in the so-called off-year and then revving up for the 2012 presidential and congressional elections. The negative ads never have to stop. ("President Obama and Representative [fill in the name of a local House Democrat] are trying to ruin this nation's future with their reckless and risky schemes to [expand government spending/raise taxes/provide amnesty to illegal immigrants/impose socialized medicine on American families].") Surely, Rove and others can find enough right-wing millionaires to underwrite a constant blitzkrieg against Obama and the Democrats.
The argument for this is an obvious one: It will soften up the Dems for the final kill in 2012. Rep. Tom Perriello, the incumbent House Democrat freshman in Virginia's 5th Congressional District, has faced such a daunting reelection this year partly because outside conservative and corporate groups started running ads against him soon after he took office in January 2009. Perriello stood out as a target, given that he won by a measly 727 votes in a GOP-friendly district. But if enough money is bagged, Rove and his comrades will be able to target not just out-on-a-limb Democrats but a host of House and Senate Democrats year-round. Local television station owners, your payday has come. Secret money will flow before, during, and after elections.
Campaign finance reform advocates are in total despair. For decades, they have tried to lessen the impact of special interest money on the political system. (The House Democrats passed Obama-backed legislation earlier this year to force disclosure of contributors, but the bill stalled in the GOP-obstructed Senate.) Now the dam seems gone, blown up, in rubble. Moreover, the Federal Election Commission, which is responsible for enforcing the campaign finance rules that still exist, is in shambles. And the Internal Revenue Service has not yet demonstrated an ability or willingness to go after the political nonprofits under its jurisdiction, which may be violating IRS rules that supposedly limit their campaign-related activities. (And how bad would it be for any of these groups to be slapped with an IRS fine after succeeding in changing the political landscape?)
All this places Obama in a jam. Does he continue to decry the rise of super PACs and secret-donor nonprofits? Or does he encourage Democrats to fight big-secret money with big-secret money of their own? In the past, the Democrats have had success marshaling such resources. (See George Soros.) But can Obama do both—assail the new campaign finance order and explain that Democrats have no choice but to play by these anti-democratic rules? Mixed messages tend not to resonate well with voters. If Obama signals Democrats that he'd like them to unleash their own big-money hounds, he will likely find it tough to score political points by opposing the GOP's big-money efforts. Then again, can racking up debate points help Obama and his Democrats stand up to a tsunami of campaign cash? It's a dilemma.
The election news tomorrow night and in the days ahead will naturally focus on who won and who lost and the subsequent shift in the balance of power in Washington. But this campaign season has brought about a profound and fundamental shift in systemic, money-based political power. And it's far from done.
David Corn is Mother Jones' Washington bureau chief. For more of his stories, click here. He's also on Twitter and Facebook. Get David Corn's RSS feed.

If You Liked This, You Might Also Like...

10 ACTIONS / REACTIONS TO THE 2010 ELECTIONS FOR PROGRESSIVES FROM CREDO ACTION 3NOV10

HERE ARE 10 ACTIONS / REACTIONS TO THE ELECTION RESULTS OF 2010 FOR PROGRESSIVES, PARTICIPATE AND SHARE WITH OTHER PROGRESSIVES, FAMILY, FRIENDS, CO-WORKERS.....


CREDO Action | more than a network. a movement.


10 things to do now
What a truly brutal election. One rare exception was the crushing of Texas Oil's Proposition 23 in California (see CREDO's campaign at stoptexasoil.org), which proves that even unlimited corporate cash can be beaten back — if it is disclosed and fought by grassroots mobilization.
At CREDO, we fight hard on the issues, but we don't take sides in partisan elections. As someone who cares about progressive issues, there is no doubt that Tuesday's results will make for even harder times for our country. It is crazy making to realize just how extreme and misinformed much of the new Congress will be.
There is little reason to expect any useful legislation from the Tea Party-dominated House or the dysfunctional Senate. Swing votes in the Senate have really troublesome names: Lieberman, Nelson, Manchin, and Pryor. In fact, this Congress will do damage to anything even remotely progressive.
So let's take a look at what happened and what we can do now. Bear with us as this is a bit longer than our usual missives. The media, unfortunately but not surprisingly, will be of no use in making sense of Tuesday's results, and even less so in helping chart a course for the future.
There is a lot of evidence that the state of the economy, and employment in particular, drive the results of elections — and this one was no exception. As the saying goes, "If you think the economy is working, ask someone who isn't." We have an economy stuck in a deep ditch, with corporate profits and bank bonuses soaring while long-term unemployment is at near Depression levels.
The Republicans shrunk the first "stimulus" package and filled it with tax breaks, even as corporate Democrats helped them along, blocking any effort to restructure mortgages in bankruptcies, freeze foreclosures or force banks to lend money. The election outcome was partially baked in early 2009, when the White House preemptively conceded on the scale and provisions of the stimulus package and chose to coddle the banks. To watch this unfold was simply maddening.
Making matters worse were other factors. Among the most damaging were the actions of the conservative majority on the Supreme Court, which seemed energized by the new President, and took the radical step of rehearing a campaign finance case — now known forever as Citizens United. In ruling 5-4 that corporations have the right to spend unlimited amounts of money for and against candidates, the Court transformed the electoral landscape in a way potentially more profound than its 5-4 ruling that seated George W. Bush as president. As many predicted, the Citizens United ruling unleashed the greatest wave of corporate spending in history, though it's a safe bet to say that their spending in 2012 will make this year's outlay look modest.
In an astonishing turn of events, the right wing was able to kill — essentially murder in public view — the organization that registered millions of poor and working class African-American and Hispanic voters in the last six years. I am speaking of ACORN, of course. By editing video completely out of context, and using the right-wing media machine to perfection, Andrew Breitbart was able to convince the mainstream media and eventually Congress, that ACORN was an election-stealing organization that had no qualms giving advice to pimps on how to increase revenues. Fulfilling Karl Rove's wildest dreams, Congress, including most Democrats, voted to block public funding for any of ACORN's laudable and effective housing or tax assistance programs, and ACORN died a quiet death. There would be no millions of new registrants.
Traditions are important in the Senate, but almost always to the detriment of progressive change. The health care reform effort was a victim of Senate conventions. Sen. Max Baucus of Montana, who chairs the critical Senate Finance Committee solely due to his long tenure, stalled development of a health reform package for many months in order to "negotiate" with Republicans on his committee. They weren't interested in the least, and walked away from the discussions muttering bizarre comments about reforms "killing grandma" and setting up "death panels," because Sarah Palin says so. The behavior of Baucus would be laughable if it were not so utterly destructive.
No matter what one thought of FOX News in the 2008 election, Murdoch's monster went on a rampage over the past two years. Serving as both an instigator and an amplifier for the craziest and most offensive pundits, FOX News misled and misinformed the American people on every issue, and effectively became the public face of the Republican Party. Glenn Beck's show became so toxic and spewed so much venom that one of his devoted fans took it upon himself to plot the execution of key leaders of the Tides Foundation and the ACLU, who had figured prominently in Beck's rants. Fortunately, the madman (the fan, not Beck) was stopped before he accomplished his mission.
We could go on, of course, on all the missed opportunities, the cave-ins, the sell outs, and the unpopular and misguided war in Afghanistan.
But the results are in. The House of Representatives is in the hands of the most corrupt Speaker-in-waiting ever, the Tea Party is ascendant, and the U.S. Senate, however dysfunctional it has been, is poised to be much worse.
For those of us who had hopes that the Obama Administration could seize the moment and enact popular progressive changes, this is a bitter pill. And like many, we grieve at the lost opportunities.
But now we need to brush off the dust, suck it up, and plunge back into substantive fights. Politics is not fair — indeed, U.S. elections are rigged in profound ways! But walking away is not an option at CREDO Action, and we hope you will join us in some of the actions below we think are strategic in the new political landscape:
1. Commit to Taking Down FOX News. So long as FOX News has any credibility within the Beltway, it will be a pipeline for malicious material that will poison our political culture. Join our friends at Color of Change: turnofffox.org/landing?credo.
2.Tell the Senate to pass the DISCLOSE Act during the lame duck session. We were able to defeat the Texas Oil Initiative, Prop 23 in California, in part because we knew who the enemy was — having disclosure of corporate contributions brings the enemy out in the open for us to take on and fight. The DISCLOSE Act passed the House and came within a single vote of passing the Senate. One vote. You can join this fight by taking action with Public Citizen at citizen.org/disclose-act-action.
3. Keep fighting to end the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans. This issue will get resolved during the lame duck session. Take action at act.credoaction.com/campaign/bushtaxcuts.
4. Sign up for the fight for a constitutional amendment to reverse the Citizens United decision by declaring that corporations do not have the legal rights of humans. This may take years, if not decades, but we should start now. Please join Free Speech for People: freespeechforpeople.org/.
5. Tell the FCC to use its existing authority to establish and defend net neutrality. Our friends at Free Press are leading this charge: act2.freepress.net/sign/put_up/.
6. Demand that the Department of Justice and the Internal Revenue Service investigate the political organizations set up by Karl Rove to launder millions of dollars in secret cash to change the outcome of elections. Act now at act.credoaction.com/campaign/investigate_crossroads.
7. Defend the EPA from castration by pro-coal interests in Congress. The EPA accomplished almost nothing during the Clinton years because the Gingrich-led Congress used the budget process to prohibit the agency from doing its work. This battle has already started. The Sierra Club's Beyond Coal campaign is a great way to join this fight: sierraclub.org/coal.
8. Convince the Obama administration to stop appealing progressive court rulings on matters like the Defense of Marriage Act, Don't Ask Don't Tell, and the state secrets defense against torture and wiretapping. Urge the Department of Justice to change its approach at act.credoaction.com/campaign/stop_appealing.
9. Urge Democratic senators to do away with lifetime tenure for committee chairs and open up all chair positions to majority vote elections. This will go a long way towards more progressive legislation. Take action with us at act.credoaction.com/campaign/end_seniority_system.
10. Demand that the Department of Justice enforce the provisions of the national voter registration law that require state governments to offer to register all voters at departments of public welfare and motor vehicles. Many state governments simply ignore these requirements and this is a cheaper and more inclusive way of registering voters than the campaigns of the now dead ACORN. Urge Attorney General Eric Holder to expand voter registration: credoaction.com/campaign/enforce_motor_voter.
I suspect you are angry and exhausted at this point. I know I am. But let us not forget that the values and ideals we fight for are greater than any one election. They still endure, and so must our fight. We have a lot of work to do.
Michael Kieschnick, CEO
CREDO Action from Working Assets

Boehner and the Republicans Didn't Win a Majority to Deny Our Care 3NOV10

EVERYBODY who worked so hard to get this passed, grass-roots activist, progressive groups, politicians in Congress, many who will not be back in JAN 2011, can be very proud of this legislation, and be assured that while the gop and their fanatical tea-bagger allies will concentrate on repealing it, the legislation is safe from them, and the American people are going to benefit. This from Health Care For America Now.
Here's a crucial fact that should not be obscured by the ballyhoo surrounding the shift in control of the House: Most of the Republicans who won last night got a lower percentage at the ballot box than the percentage of Americans who support the new health care law's requirement that insurance companies cover people regardless of pre-existing medical conditions.
That's why yesterday was hardly a repudiation of the health care law.

Furthermore, this election was clearly dominated by voter worries about the economy and jobs. Only 19 percent of voters named health care as their top concern, a distant second to the 61 percent most focused on the economy, according to CNN. There were winners and losers among both supporters and opponents of health reform. For example, more than half of the 34 Democrats who voted against the health care legislation still lost their races.

After a wildly toxic political debate over the issue, people are split over the larger question of "reform" and key components of the law enjoy overwhelming public support. Specifically, over the last several months, even as the public has been divided on reform, two-thirds of Americans have supported the outlawing of pre-existing condition exclusions (Anzalone Liszt Research poll conducted for the Herndon Alliance of 1,000 2010 likely voters, conducted April 19-25, 2010. Margin of error +/-3%). For example, while a recent New York Times/CBS poll showed the public split over on the new law, only one-quarter of repeal supporters stuck with their position when told repeal would mean that insurance companies would no longer be required to cover people with medical conditions or prior illnesses.

This is the reality even after a contentious political season marked by an unprecedented deluge of attack ads that spread one lie after another about health reform. In fact, opponents of the new law spent $108 million since March to advertise against it - six times more than supporters.

That's something members of the new Republican majority will have to navigate as they square real-world legislative proposals on health care (if they have any) with their campaign rhetoric about repeal. They may try on Day One to repeal the health care law's individual mandate, but they can't do that without also throwing out the many new consumer protections, including the prohibition on insurers denying people care simply because they're sick or ending lifetime limits on coverage. Both of those provisions are more popular with the American public than the Republicans are.

The Republicans also talk about de-funding the law, interfering with its implementation and holding endless oversight hearings to gratuitously harass Obama administration officials. That's not progress, that's pointless, cynical politics.

We all know that the law is not going to be repealed, so the debateisn't going to be about what gets done--it will be about defining whose side members of Congress are on. For Republican repeal-mongers, that will be clear. They're for the insurance companies and against consumers.

The Republicans want to protect the excessive profits of the insurance companies and the bloated salaries of company CEOs, no matter how badly that hurts America's consumers. That's what repeal means. It means rolling back the clock and letting the insurance companies deny people coverage due to pre-existing conditions and drop people's coverage when they get sick. It means that small businesses will continue paying higher rates for health insurance than big corporations. It means repealing measures to cut down waste, fraud and abuse in Medicare. It means opposing much-needed relief in prescription drug costs for seniors. That's the Republican repeal agenda - the insurance companies get the profits and we get the shaft.

The American people don't want to give our health care back to the insurance companies. Repeal would cause real harm to real people. That may not matter to the Republican majority, but it matters a great deal to the people they now represent.


 

Angry Voters Choose Government Gridlock, Investigations and Shutdown 3NOV10

THE election results come as no surprise to me, I knew the Democrats would loose the House when health care reform was passed. Just as the Democrats suffered big losses in the elections due to ignorance, prejudice, and propaganda fueled fear after Congress passed civil rights, voting rights, fair housing and anti-discrimination in employment during the Johnson administration (while we were at war in Vietnam), the Democrats suffered in these elections after passing health care reform, financial and banking reform, an economic stimulus package, all benefiting all Americans right, left and center, rich and poor. It may take some time, but as the republicans and the tea-baggers drag the nation further into economic decline and greater income inequality the American people may realize the stupidity of their election decisions. Until they have a chance to change their elected officials again I fear they will rue their  vote on 2 NOV 10. This from Bob Cesca of HuffPost.
It's continues to be a mystery to me why Americans voted they way they voted yesterday. Clearly they were dissatisfied somehow with the objective reality that the Obama administration and the congressional Democrats actually made things better -- cutting the deficit by an historic $122 billion; creating upwards of three million new jobs; ending the war in Iraq; passing the largest middle class tax cut in history; rescuing the economy from the brink of collapse. Not good enough. Obviously.
Or did voters simply not know about these accomplishments? That's entirely possible given the Democratic Party's uncanny penchant for running away from its successes, while also fumbling very basic add-water-and-serve marketing chores. (And, by the way, adding to the party's failures to ballyhoo its accomplishments, the progressive movement was systematically out-hustled, out-gunned and out-maneuvered for much of the last two years.)
Of course there's also the Flailing Rage Factor, which I tend to favor as a reason for yesterday's outcome more than ignorance or lack of Democratic marketing chops. For two years now, Americans have been incited by fakery and horror stories to the point of being pumped up into a 'roid raging mob chanting shallow platitudes and bumper sticker zingers -- incoherently attacking Speaker Pelosi's face, and bent out of shape by the fact that there's not a doddering old white guy stumbling through the west wing spinning grandfatherly yarns about American mornings and saintly cowboys.
Ultimately, what Americans voted for yesterday was divided government, which admittedly isn't new in American politics. We typically like the idea of two sides, Congress and the White House, locking horns and ultimately compromising on the important matters of the day.
Unfortunately, this is a "pre-01/20/09" mindset. It's a mass delusion based on antiquated political attitudes.
The era when Republicans would, at least reluctantly, compromise with a Democratic president is long gone.
What voters unknowingly asked for yesterday was gridlock: immovable, unprecedented, insufferable gridlock of the worst kind, and at the worst time imaginable.
The Republicans have no intention of handing the president any successes. They'll never in a million years compromise with this White House, or the Senate Democrats for that matter, because any move in that direction will bring down the loud, screechy tweet wrath of Sarah Palin and the tea party who will neither accept nor support anyone who appears to be leaning in the direction of the Obama agenda.
How do I know this? There's two years of precedent, naturally -- and the Republicans weren't even the majority party in the House during that time. They voted against anything and everything that came down the line, regardless of how politically awful it looked (health care for 9/11 workers, bonuses for the troops, etc.). Now imagine what they're going to accomplishment in the name of "Hell No You Can't!" now that they enjoy a decent majority in the House and a narrow minority in the Senate.
Now that they're in control of appropriations and all House legislation, they'll only take up business the president would never in a million years sign into law, because as soon as he signs a bill, any bill, it becomes a win for the White House. A victory, however minor, that the president would be able to campaign on in 2012. Consequently, the Republican Party and its tea party base will only deliver far-right crap on a stick, with deceptive names and semi-hidden, unacceptable amendments that will make the legislation instant veto fodder.
So it's difficult to imagine a scenario whereby anything gets done from January 2011 through, at least, January 2013.
Strike that.
Yesterday's election launched America headlong across the zero barrier of the Darrell Issa Decade. Welcome, everyone, to the suck that never ends. Let the cartoons begin!
Brace yourself for a wide variety of investigations designed to slowly fester into an all out impeachment necrosis. The Republicans will absolutely investigate ACORN, those two Black Panther guys in Philadelphia, birth certificates, Joe Sestak's (unpaid) job offer, the oil spill response, the tax records of anyone even remotely associated with the White House and, for good measure, I'll go out on a McCarthy limb and predict another congressional witch hunt for commies, with maybe even a bonus witch hunt for Muslim evildoers, in the Obama government.
The cable news media will enjoy this thoroughly. And by "enjoy" I mean "inject it into its bloodstream like black tar heroin laced with permanent orgasms." And we can all rest assured knowing that, with a few obvious exceptions (Maddow, Olbermann), the coverage will be framed with advantage Issa.
Oh, and did I mention the inevitable government shutdown? Just wait until the House attempts to de-fund health care reform in the next budget and, predictably, the president refuses to sign it. The government will shut down and all of those anti-government-health-care, anti-socialism retirees stop receiving their Social Security checks and Medicare reimbursement checks. And why? Who knows. They'll tell you something about "freedom" and "slavery" and trail off when they begin to slowly realize that they can pay the bills that month because they elected a Congress that would rather torment the president than actually accomplish the business of governing.
See, unlike the Democratic Party -- and the pre-Bush-era Republican Party for that matter -- the modern Republican Party, driven by the contradictory memes of the tea party movement, doesn't require or seek legislative success to thrive as long as there's fear, inchoate rage and a mega-funded media apparatus (Fox News and talk radio) to spread the nonsense far and wide. So why bother digging into the ugly business of compromise with the other side? There's no need. The total lack of legislative accomplishment can simply be masked over with loud noises and sloganeering aimed at blaming, you know, the black guy.
Again, how do I know? The strategy paid off bigtime yesterday.
One final thought: I wonder if this will help to ameliorate a slow growth economy. Don't bet on it.

Why Obama's Indonesia trip matters to Filep from AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL 3NOV10

PRESIDENT Obama will travel to Indonesia this month, and Amnesty International is calling on House members to support Rep. Patrick Kennedy's resolution calling on the Indonesian govt. to release all prisoners of conscience, and for Pres. Obama to press Indonesia on their human rights record. Please participate by clicking the links below
Amnesty International USA: TAKE ACTION NOW!

Dear Craig,

President Obama's trip to Indonesia, which has been delayed twice before, has been re-scheduled for early this month - a critical time for action in Indonesia.

Government censorship in Indonesia is at a boiling point - books, films and other media are being banned. A gruesome video has recently surfaced showing Indonesian military forces burning, beating and torturing a number of Papuans, one of the country's marginalized groups. Filep Karma, who was arrested 6 years ago for simply raising the Papuan flag, remains in jail.

The President's re-scheduled trip to Indonesia truly couldn't come at a more crucial time, but his trip won't mean as much if our members of Congress don't back him up!

Ask your Representative to condemn Indonesia's imprisonment of peaceful political activists.
Free Indonesia\'s prisoners of conscience

In late July, your tireless activism helped secure much-needed medical attention for Filep Karma before he was returned back to prison shortly after. Filep asked us to pass along his thanks to all Amnesty activists who made his surgery possible.

House Resolution 1355 was created for people like Filep - those who are jailed because they dared to exercise their political beliefs publicly, yet peacefully.

And because so many of you have already picked up the phone and sent emails and letters to champion this cause, we've already gained a tremendous amount of support in Congress.

But we need just 6 more members to voice their support from the House Foreign Affairs Committee in order for the resolution to move forward!

Please send your message of support now. Filep and other prisoners of conscience in Indonesia don't deserve to spend another day behind prison bars.

Your message can help.

In Solidarity,

Michael O'Reilly
Senior Campaign Director, Individuals at Risk
Amnesty International USA

P.S. You can continue to write letters of hope for Filep Karma by signing up to Write for Rights - Amnesty International's largest and most powerful letter-writing event!