NORTON META TAG

Showing posts with label child molestation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label child molestation. Show all posts

17 September 2025

Here's how Donald Trump did child predators a solid 16SEP25


Edvard Munch's 1893 painting The Scream is sometimes associated with nihilism due to its theme of existential terror. It can also be used to represent the terror of the victims of pedophiles like the children who were sexually abused by those in the epstein files and client list.....

NOT MY pres drumpf's /trump's decision to divert THOUSANDS of law enforcement agents from the FBI, US Marshals Service, ATF, DEA and HSI to join ice in their illegal and immoral round ups, detentions and deportations of immigrants in the U.S. For all his bullshit about addressing gang violence drumpf / trump has left the FBI Domestic Terrorism squad in Baltimore, MD severely depleted, making their monitoring and investigating of the 764 group, a nihilistic violent extremist group difficult. Keep in mind drumpf / trump has frequently declared Baltimore as one of those cities overcome by crime so he wants to send in Federalized National Guard. ( IT has been suggested charlie kirk's murderer is a nihilist, not of the political left or right but one who believes in Nihilism, a family of philosophical views arguing that life is meaningless, that moral values are baseless, or that knowledge is impossible. ) The article below, from Daily KOS, has more on nihilism. Bottom line is the more law enforcement agents are diverted to ice, the safer from arrest pedophiles and other sexual predators and deviants are...

Here's how Donald Trump did child predators a solid


President Donald Trump isn't concerned with stopping child predators when there are undocumented immigrants to round up.

Criminals who prey on children are receiving a boost from President Donald Trump who, as part of his drive to increase immigration busts and deportations, has diverted law enforcement agents once tasked with investigating vile online predator groups.

The right-leaning CATO Institute released a report based on leaked internal Immigration and Customs Enforcement records that shows thousands of agents have been directed to focus on the Trump administration’s cruel immigration agenda instead.

According to the data that CATO received, nearly 20% of agents from the U.S. Marshals Service and the FBI have been diverted, along with over 40% of agents from the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, and Homeland Security Investigations.

“Agents aren’t out there recruiting sources. They are not maintaining trip wires. They are not able to keep their ear to the ground about what’s happening among extremist movements,” former senior FBI executive Michael Feinberg told MSNBC.

For instance, members of the domestic terrorism squad based in Baltimore were involved in investigating the so-called 764 group, which the FBI previously described as a “nihilistic violent extremist group.” But according to law enforcement sources that spoke to MSNBC, members of the squad were deployed in March to round up undocumented immigrants and fewer agents are available to investigate 764  group cases.

The 764 group seeks out teenagers via social media and coerces them into committing depraved acts. These have included creating graphic pornography, harming family pets, making bomb threats, and others. The group extorts its victims and deepens their control of them by threatening to release recordings of these acts.

Cartoon by Mike Luckovich

FBI Assistant Director David Scott told ABC News in a May report that one of the group’s goals is to “sow chaos” and “bring down society.”

But Trump has made it clear that immigration enforcement via spectacle is his preferred focus. The president and senior members of his administration like deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller have demanded raids and busts that make for good television and social media posts.

By diverting law enforcement resources in favor of creating a xenophobic show, Trump and company continue their work helping pedophiles and other criminal deviants who prey on children. Aided by congressional Republicans, the administration has refused to release the full details and files surrounding sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged sex trafficking ring.

Many of Epstein’s victims, who were preyed upon when they were underage, have slammed the lawmakers’ callous responses. But the administration wants to put on a show, and it’s clearly okay with children suffering as long as Trump can provide more material for the Republican Party’s racist base.


05 September 2025

VIDEO & TRANSCRIPTS: “Courage Is Contagious”: Survivors Demand Epstein Files Release as More Women Come Forward 4SEP25


 

DESPITE the gop / guardians of pedophilia-republican party's and AG fascist fotze pam bondi's refusal to release the complete epstein files and client list, the victims of epstein, maxwell and their clients held a news conference on the steps of the US Capital demanding all the files and list of this criminal enterprise be released along with the names of those who participated in the trafficking, abuse, molestation, rape, and exploitation of these women when they were minors. These women know their demands are not going to be met, they should just release the information they have that they know to be true, regardless of the consequences for those they name. From Democracy Now!.....

Jeffrey Epstein survivors rallied in front of Congress on Wednesday, detailing their experiences of abuse and calling for the release of all Epstein files. “We cannot heal without justice,” says one Epstein survivor, Chauntae Davies. “We cannot protect the future if we refuse to confront the past.” Survivors also announced that some victims would work to confidentially compile their own list of individuals implicated in Epstein’s crimes. This comes as lawmakers seek to force a House floor vote compelling the Justice Department to release all the files from the Jeffrey Epstein case.

Lauren Hersh, the national director of the anti-trafficking organization World Without Exploitation, is a former sex-trafficking prosecutor in New York who joined survivors for their press conference just steps from the Capitol on Wednesday. “Courage is contagious,” says Hersh, adding that “we were approached by several other Epstein survivors who we didn’t even know.”

Guests
  • Lauren Hersh
    national director of the anti-trafficking organization World Without Exploitation.


Transcript
This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.

NERMEEN SHAIKH: Survivors of serial sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein held a press conference steps away from the Capitol Wednesday to share their testimonies and demand lawmakers release all government files related to the Epstein investigation. Calls for the full files to be released have continued to grow, particularly among President Trump’s base. Trump campaigned on releasing the files but has called it a distraction and a, quote, “Democratic hoax” since taking office. The women were joined by members of Congress who have introduced a rare bipartisan bill that would make release of the Epstein investigation files law.

AMY GOODMAN: In a few minutes, we’ll speak with Congressmember Ro Khanna, who co-sponsored the bill, and Lauren Hersh of World Without Exploitation, which helped organize the survivors who spoke out Wednesday. But first, the voices of survivors.

MARINA LACERDA: My name is Marina Lacerda. I was minor victim one in federal indictment of Jeffrey Epstein in New York in 2019. I was one of dozen of girls that I personally know who were forced into Jeffrey’s mansion on 9 East 71 Street in New York City when we were just kids.

Today is the first time that I ever speak publicly about what happened to me. I never thought that I would find myself here. The only reason that I am here is because it feels like the people who matter in this country finally care about what we have to say. As an immigrant from Brazil, I feel empowered knowing that the little girl struggling to get by at 14 and 15 years old finally has a voice. For the first time, I feel like I matter as an American.

I was only 14 years old when I met Jeffrey. It was the summer of high school. I was working three jobs to try to support my mom and my sister, when a friend of mine in the neighborhood told me that I could make $300 to give another guy a massage. It went from a dream job to the worst nightmare. Jeffrey assistant Lesley Groff would call me and tell me that I needed to be at the house so often that I ended up dropping out of high school before ninth grade, and I never went back. From 14 to 17 years old, I went and worked for Jeffrey instead of receiving an education. Every day, I hoped that he would offer me a real job as one of his assistants or something, something important. I would finally have made it big, as, like we say, the American dream. That day never came. I had no way. I had no way out. I was — until he finally told me that I was too old.

There are many pieces of my story that I can’t remember, no matter how hard I try. The constant state of wonder causes me so much fear and so much confusion. My therapist says that my brain is just trying to protect itself, but it’s so hard to begin to heal, knowing that there are people out there who know more about my abuse than I do. The worst part is that the government is still in possession right now of the documents and information about — that could help me remember and get over all of this, maybe, and help me heal. They have documents with my name on them that were confiscated from Jeffrey Epstein’s house and could help me put the pieces of my own life back together.

HALEY ROBSON: My name is Haley Robson. I was a 16-year-old high school student athlete who made good grades and had high aspirations for college, when I was recruited and asked by a classmate of mine, alongside with a 20-year-old male, if I wanted to give an old rich guy a massage. But what high school girl would not want to do that? That day changed my life forever.

And when I got into the massage room, Jeffrey Epstein undressed and asked me to do things to him. My eyes welled up with tears, and I have never been more scared in my life. When it was over, he made — he paid me $200 and requested, in exchange, that I bring a girl each time to make another $200. I told him I did not want to do that, and then he gave me an ultimatum: “Either you come here and massage me when I call you, or you bring me friends of yours to massage, and I will give you $200 per girl for each time she comes.”

I felt and hoped to never hear from him again, but he called me every day. He was so wealthy and powerful, and he would not let me go. I felt I had no choice. If I disobeyed him, I knew something bad would happen. So, knowing I did not want to be sexually abused — I’m sorry — I started to bring him other girls from my high school, and he paid me $200, $200 for bringing them. I just hoped each time it would be the last time.

One day, the stepmom of one of the girls brought him and called the police on Jeffrey Epstein. The police then called me, called me in for questioning. I had told them the truth, despite the fact that I was a teenager and a minor, and I was able to tell the police the names of all the other victims. The police treated me like a criminal. I had, by this time, had turned 18. I had been with Jeffrey since I was 16 and for two years. So, they had told me I distribute — I distributed to the — so, they told me I was going to be arrested. My name was then distributed to the press as a co-conspirator of my abuser, who I detested. My entire world was crashing in around me, and I started being threatened and bullied, ’til this day still receiving death threats.

CHAUNTAE DAVIES: My name is Chauntae Davies, and I’m here before you today as a survivor, a survivor of decades of pain, the trauma, betrayal at the hands of Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein, and the people who enabled them, and a government that for far too long refused to help. …

I was just one of the many young women trapped in his orbit. I was even taken on a trip to Africa with former President Bill Clinton and other notable figures. In those moments, I realized how powerless I was. If I spoke out, who would believe me? Who would protect me? Epstein himself was the most powerful leader of our country — Epstein surrounded himself, I’m sorry, with the most powerful leaders of our country and the world. He abused not only me, but countless others, and everyone seemed to look away. The truth is, Epstein had a free pass. He bragged about his powerful friends, including our current president, Donald Trump. It was his biggest brag, actually.

And while I — what I endured will haunt me forever. I live every day with PTSD. I live as a mother trying to raise my child while distrusting a world that has betrayed me. This kind of trauma never leaves you. It breaks families apart. It shapes the way we see everyone around us. But one thing is certain: Unless we learn from this history, monsters like Epstein will rise again.

There are files, government files, that hold the truth about Epstein, who he knew, who owed him, who protected him, and why he was allowed to operate for so long without consequence. Why was Maxwell the only one held accountable when so many others played a role? Why does the government hide this information from the public? This secrecy is not protection; it’s complicity. And as long as the truth is buried, justice will remain out of reach.

That is why this bill matters. Passing it will — bless you — endure — ensure that the suffering of survivors is not in vain. Passing it will bring accountability, transparency and prevention. It will help protect the next generation of predators who seek to place themselves above the law through wealth, influence and connections.

This is not just my story. It is about every survivor who carries invisible scars. It’s about the weight we live with daily. It is about the families broken and the futures stolen. So, I ask you, President Trump and members of Congress: Why do we continue to cover up sexual abuse and assault? Who are we covering for? Let the public know the truth. We cannot heal without justice. We cannot protect the future if we refuse to confront the past.

NERMEEN SHAIKH: Those were some of the Epstein survivors who spoke out Wednesday in a news conference outside the Capitol. They also called for the passage of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, introduced by Republican Thomas Massie and Democrat Ro Khanna, who will join us in a moment.

AMY GOODMAN: World Without Exploitation helped organize the survivors who spoke out. It’s the largest anti-trafficking coalition in the country. For more, we’re joined by its national director, Lauren Hersh, the former chief of sex-trafficking unit here in New York.

Lauren Hersh, welcome to Democracy Now! If you can talk about the significance of this moment? You had scores of women, of survivors. Some of them had never spoken before, surrounding the group of women who did speak. Talk about this moment and also what it means for them to be calling for something that the Trump administration said they were protecting the victims when they were not releasing the files, calling for the release of the Epstein files.

LAUREN HERSH: Well, good morning, and thank you so much for having me.

This was truly a historic moment. We saw more than 20 Epstein survivors come together. They stood in solidarity with one another and so many survivors of other exploiters who joined them at the Hill yesterday to listen to their voices. And it was historic for so many reasons, because this was really the first time that these women were coming together and really connecting with one another.

But also, it was so powerful to listen to their stories and also listen to their call to action, and listen to the other women who surrounded them, many of whom were exploited by other people. But interestingly, we were approached by several other Epstein survivors, who we didn’t even know who were in the space, who said, “I needed to be here today. I needed to listen to my survivor sisters. And this gave me strength and empowered me for the very first time.”

NERMEEN SHAIKH: Well, that’s extraordinary, Lauren. Do you think any of those people would be willing, the people who were there who were also survivors of Epstein’s or his consorts, cohorts, subject to their — to sexual abuse by them, whether they would also be willing to speak out?

LAUREN HERSH: Well, what we know is courage is contagious. And we saw that yesterday. I’m not sure if any of these women who came yesterday, who were Epstein survivors who had never said that out loud, if they planned to even approach some of us. And yet, once they listened to these survivors speaking their truth, they felt empowered and safe enough to come forward and say, “Yes, me, too.” So, I think this may be the moment where we are unlocking even more, more voices, more survivors, and the possibility of so much more truth coming out.

AMY GOODMAN: I wanted to turn to President Trump’s response when asked about the Epstein survivors’ testimony, as he was sitting in the Oval Office.

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: So, this is a Democrat hoax that never ends. … I think we’re probably having, according to what I read, even from two people in this room, we’re having the most successful eight months of any president ever. And that’s what I want to talk about. That’s what we should be talking about, not the Epstein hoax.

AMY GOODMAN: So, that was President Trump. Lauren Hersh, a “hoax.” I keep thinking of one of the women saying, “I’m a Republican. I voted for President Trump. This doesn’t have to do with party politics.” Your response, Lauren?

LAUREN HERSH: I mean, what I want to talk about is listening to the voices of survivors, right? They said, loud and clear, this is not a political issue. This is not a partisan issue. This is an issue about people. This is an issue about what they, these women, collectively and individually, have experienced over decades. There has been so much trauma. There has been so much terror. And they’re finally at the point where they’re saying, “No more. We are ready to speak our truth.”

And truthfully, this is not the first time that women have come forward. Many have come forward individually, saying, “We want these people to be held to account.” But this is really the first time that they’re collectively coming together. And so, we want to make sure that we’re centering those voices, we’re listening to the voices, who are saying, very loud and clear, it’s time to release all of the files.

NERMEEN SHAIKH: And, Lauren, if you could comment on the significance of the survivors saying that they are, in fact, compiling a list of clients themselves? They didn’t say necessarily that they would release that client list, but just the fact that they’re compiling it. Your response to that?

LAUREN HERSH: My response is, there is such power in this incredible community. What you’re hearing from them are decades of frustration. These are women who have been let down by system after system, and they’re at the point where they’re saying, “We’ve got answers. We know the truth. And if we come together, we can provide the truth.” And so, that is what they intend to do. It’s very powerful.

AMY GOODMAN: Lauren Hersh, we want to thank you so much for being with us, national director of the largest anti-trafficking coalition in the country, World Without Exploitation, former sex-trafficking prosecutor in New York. The organization helped to organize the survivors who spoke out Wednesday just steps from the Capitol.

03 October 2014

The top 13 governor’s races of 2014, from the top down...PA, AR, ME, CT. KS, IL, CO, MI, FL, WI, GA, MA, AK 3OKT14

JUST interesting reading for us political junkies, but to be honest I really want tom corbett voted out of the governors mansion in Harrisburg. He has his head so far up corporate America's collective ass he needs a snorkel to breath, and there are lingering questions about the Penn State child molestation investigation when he was the Commonwealth's A.G. From the +Washington Post .....

The top 13 governor’s races of 2014

October 3 at 12:22 PM
Over the past 30 years, only 34 incumbent governors have lost in the general election. That's about one per year or about two for every two-year election cycle.
The 2014 election looks to be much different. And in fact, we could very well see more incumbent governors lose this year than in any year since at least 1984. All it would take is for seven of them to lose.
Here's how that looks, over time (courtesy of Philip Bump):
So will seven actually lose? Well, on our ratings below and in public polls, we've got four or five incumbents looking like underdogs — Corbett in Pennsylvania, LePage in Maine, Malloy in Connecticut and Brownback in Kansas. Some might even include Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn (D) on that list, though he has recovered somewhat in the polls.
From there, incumbent governors in Florida, Colorado, Michigan and Wisconsin are in what appear to be toss-ups (or pretty close).
Even if half of those four toss-ups went the direction of the challenger, as of now that would probably mean seven incumbent governors lost on Nov. 4 — a new record.
Of course, we're still a month from that election, and there's a reason incumbents rarely lose. We'll see if some of them can assert themselves over the next four weeks.
...
Below is our latest ranking of the 13 governor's races most likely to change control this year. As always, No. 1 is the most likely to flip (in this case, it will flip), while No. 13 is the least likely — but still quite competitive, given there are many more races across the country that didn't make our list.
To the line!
Off the line: Arizona
13. Alaska (Republican-controlled): This race was Greg Orman before Greg Orman. As in the Kansas Senate race, the Democrat here dropped out of the race, giving the independent a better shot to beat the Republican incumbent. In this case, though, the Democrat became the independent's running mate. The result: Two robopolls this month show the independent, Bill Walker, leading Gov. Sean Parnell (R) by four and five points. Robopolls, yes. But still. (Previous ranking: N/A)
12. Massachusetts (Democratic-controlled): It's happening again. Two recent polls show a very close race between Democrat Martha Coakley and Republican Charlie Baker. Coakley's fundraising woes have required the congressional delegation to get involved. It's not time to panic yet for Democrats, but things aren't looking good right now. (Previous ranking: N/A) 
11. Georgia (R): Would you have believed a year ago that Republicans would be in better shape in Georgia's open Senate race than in the governor's race? Gov. Nathan Deal (R) is running neck and neck with Democrat Jason Carter, polls show. If there's to be a Democratic upset in the Peach State this year, the smart money is on this race. (Previous ranking: 11)
10. Wisconsin (R): Gov. Scott Walker (R), after a summer of close polls, has opened up an edge over businesswoman Mary Burke (D) in the latest Marquette Law School survey. This is a deeply polarized electorate, and both sides are focused on turning out every person in their bases — as well as bringing in political celebrities to do it. Just this week, Chris Christie and Michelle Obama were in the state on the same day. Of course, the implications here are big for the 2016 presidential race — and Walker's potential presence as a candidate or VP pick. (Previous ranking: 9)
9. Colorado (D): A Quinnipiac University poll a couple weeks back showed Republican Bob Beauprez leading Gov. John Hickenlooper (D) by 10 points (!), but three other recent polls show Hickenlooper leading within the margin of error. That's called polling whiplash. What we do know: This is competitive. (Previous ranking: 10)
8. Michigan (R): Republican Gov. Rick Snyder (R) has rarely trailed in the polls, but this is Michigan, and Republicans have seen the football yanked away from their foot before. Snyder, meanwhile, is accusing Democrats of "lying" about his record on education spending. Rest assured: This will be one of the most heated campaigns down the stretch. (Previous ranking: 8)
7. Florida (R): The post-Labor Day movement in polls has been in former governor Charlie Crist's (D) direction. As FiveThirtyEight has pointed out, the matchup between Crist and Gov. Rick Scott (R) is really a race to the bottom — with neither man at all well liked by the state's voters. Who wins matters a lot come 2016, since Florida will be a contested state in the primary and general election for both parties. (Previous ranking: 7)
6. Illinois (D): If Gov. Pat Quinn (D) somehow wins reelection, he will be the survival story of 2014. The Democrat got some fundraising help this week from President Obama. GOP businessman Bruce Rauner's wealth is getting the Romney treatment from Democrats, and polls suggest that Quinn has recovered somewhat. The question is whether someone as unpopular as Quinn can still win. (Previous ranking: 5)
5. Kansas (R): Pat Roberts is getting all the attention these days, but Gov. Sam Brownback (R) was the original under-performing Kansas Republican. A Suffolk University poll this week shows him trailing Democrat Paul Davis by six points — one more than Roberts's deficit. If we had to pick one of the two that was more likely to lose, it would be Brownback. His problems are much more ingrained. (Previous ranking: 5)
4. Connecticut (D): This is a blue state, and Gov. Dan Malloy (D) has the advantage of incumbency, but make no mistake: This race is at real risk of flipping to Republicans. GOP nominee Tom Foley — whom Malloy narrowly defeated in 2010 — is leading in some recent polls. Outside money is pouring in from both labor unions and the Republican Governors Association. (Previous ranking: 4)
3. Maine (R): Okay, so Gov. Paul LePage (R) has hung tough in polling, even as many folks (The Fix included) didn't really expect him to. Good for him. But we're getting to the point in the campaign in which people realize that the independent, Eliot Cutler, who is polling in the double digits, doesn't really have a chance to win. History shows that's when the independent's voters start to migrate to one of the other candidates. We think that favors Rep. Mike Michaud (D), but who knows at this point? (Previous ranking: 3)
2. Arkansas (D): Democrats had high hopes for this open seat when they landed their top recruit in former congressman Mike Ross. But the conservative lean of the state looks like it will be too much for Ross, as virtually every poll released in the past six weeks gives former congressman Asa Hutchinson (R) a clear edge. (Previous ranking: 2)
1. Pennsylvania (R): The only question is how many points businessman Tom Wolf (D) is going to beat Gov. Tom Corbett (R) by in 32 days. (Previous ranking: 1)
Aaron Blake covers national politics and writes regularly for The Fix.
Chris Cillizza writes “The Fix,” a politics blog for the Washington Post. He also covers the White House.
Sean Sullivan has covered national politics for The Washington Post since 2012.

04 October 2013

Watch the Governor of Pennsylvania Compare Gay Marriage to Incest 4OKT13

I'm not so sure gov corbett has the moral authority to judge gay marriage until he comes completely clean about the recent Penn State scandal. Consider this "Gov. Tom Corbett took the case on a referral from the Centre County district attorney, Michael Madeira, in early 2009 while he was serving as attorney general. Maderia said he referred the report to state prosecutors because of an "indirect connection" to Sandusky's family, but he declined to specify his tie to the Sandusky family.
Corbett bristled Tuesday when asked whether it was fair for people to criticize the pace of the probe.
"People that are saying that are ill-informed as to how investigations are conducted, how witnesses are developed, how backup information, corroborative information is developed, and they really don't know what they're talking about," he told reporters.
The attorney general's office declined to comment on the pace of the investigation.
The Patriot-News of Harrisburg reported Monday that only one trooper was assigned to the case after the state took it over in 2009. It wasn't until Corbett became governor early this year that his former investigations supervisor in the attorney general's office, Frank Noonan, became state police commissioner and put seven more investigators on it, the newspaper said" and see the full story at
http://bucknacktssordidtawdryblog.blogspot.com/2011/11/gov-corbett-buried-sandusky-scandal-as.html From Mother Jones......
On Friday, Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Corbett (R) was asked by a reporter a Harrisburg's CBS affiliate to clear the air about his views on same-sex marriage, after a legal brief filed on behalf of his administration compared same-sex marriage to letting 12-year-olds get married. But Corbett, who had previously called the comparison "inappropriate," wasn't in an apologetic mood. Instead, he offered up a comparison of his own. "It was an inappropriate analogy—I think a much better analogy would have been brother and sister, don't you?" Commence awkward silence.
Watch:
Published on Oct 4, 2013

Reporter
Tim Murphy is a reporter at Mother Jones. Email him with tips and insights at tmurphy [at] motherjones [dot] com. RSS | 

22 September 2012

Terry Williams: A victim might be executed 22SEP12

PENNSYLVANIA governor tom corbett r has a chance to do penance for his role in the coverup of the child abuse at Penn State by jerry sandusky. He has the authority, and the moral responsibility, to stop the execution of Terry Williams. Salon offers this expose of state sanctioned murder that will take place on 3OCT12 unless the courts or the governor intervene. Click the link to sign the petition by Change.org calling on gov corbett, the PA Board of Pardons, and DA Seth Williams to grant clemency to Terry Williams http://www.change.org/petitions/governor-tom-corbett-pa-board-of-pardons-district-attorney-seth-williams-grant-clemency-to-terrance-williams-survivor-of-child-sexual-abuse

The state that turned a blind eye to Jerry Sandusky for too long might execute a man who killed his abusers

Terry Williams: A victim might be executed
At a time when two of Pennsylvania’s largest institutions have been exposed for turning a blind eye to the sexual abuse of children, the state is preparing to execute a victim of child sex abuse for killing his abusers.
In 1984, less than four months after his 18th birthday — the minimum age required for capital punishment — Terrance “Terry” Williams was sentenced to death for the murder of 56-year-old Amos Norwood, a Philadelphia church leader. With the help of 18-year-old Marc Draper, the son of a police officer, Williams smashed Norwood’s skull with a tire iron, set fire to his body and dumped him in a cemetery. Just five months earlier, Williams was convicted of third-degree murder for killing 50-year-old Herbert Hamilton, who was found naked on his kitchen floor with a knife in his throat.
But according to Williams’ lawyers, both the jury and defense were deliberately kept in the dark about the true motive behind the killings — the sexual abuse Williams, now 46, endured at the hands of Hamilton and Norwood. At the time, Williams now says, he was too ashamed to admit the abuse. Now he says he was violently raped by Norwood the night before the murder. Five of the jurors that sentenced Williams to death have testified that they never would have done so had they known about Williams’ history of childhood sexual abuse — and had they known that his victims were also his abusers.
As Williams’ Oct. 3 execution nears, his attorneys are scrambling to save his life. On Monday, the Pennsylvania Board of Pardons rejected a clemency petition. Though the five-member board voted 3-to-2 in favor of clemency, unanimous approval is required for the governor to consider halting the execution. Williams’s lawyers have since asked the Board of Pardons to reconsider, citing an allegedly inaccurate statement made by assistant district attorney Thomas Dolgenos, though it’s unclear whether board rules allow for reconsideration.
Williams’ life currently rests in the hands of Philadelphia Common Pleas Court judge M. Teresa Sarmina, who has the power to grant an emergency stay of execution. Victor Abreu, one of Williams’ attorneys, tells Salon, “The state knew the real motive for the killing and yet presented evidence that was false.” Sarmina is currently reviewing whether this is indeed the case.
At the time of the trial, the prosecution alleged that the killing was motivated by robbery, using the testimony of Draper, Williams’ co-defendant, as proof. But Draper, also now 46, has recanted his testimony and says that he told homicide detectives and then prosecutor Andrea Foulkes on multiple occasions that Williams was motivated by sexual abuse, not robbery.
In an evidentiary hearing held on Thursday, Sarmina listened to nine hours of testimony from Draper and Foulkes, now a federal prosecutor.
Draper, who was convicted of second-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison without parole for his role in Norwood’s killing, says he was promised a shot at parole in exchange for testifying that robbery was the motive. He also contends that Foulkes promised to write a letter to the parole board on his behalf.
Foulkes called Draper’s claim that she ignored evidence of sexual abuse and instructed him to change his testimony “a complete lie,” though she acknowledges having written a letter for him to the parole board in 1988. The hearing is scheduled to continue on Monday.
Ironically, it is Pennsylvania’s Republican Gov. Tom Corbett — under fire by some critics for how long it took to bring charges against former Penn State football assistant coach Jerry Sandusky when Corbett was state attorney general — who signed Williams’ death warrant in early August. Some critics have said that Corbett deliberately understaffed an investigation team, so much so that it took three years to arrest Sandusky, during which more children were likely abused.
As a result, it will be interesting to see whether Corbett chooses to intervene on behalf of Williams, a popular high school quarterback and also a victim of sex abuse whose abusers, like Sandusky, appear to have been repeatedly ignored despite being suspected of wrongdoing.
Marc Bookman, executive director of the Atlantic Center for Capital Representation in Philadelphia, tells Salon that, “If there is any state that has a sense of what sexual abuse does to someone, it’s Pennsylvania.” Bookman says he is “cautiously optimistic” that the state will spare Williams. “I would hope that the governor’s experience in the Sandusky case would make him more sensitive and more understanding of the incredible trauma that Terry Williams underwent.”
Despite declarations of sympathy for child victims of sex abuse by Pennsylvania’s politicians and bureaucrats, the prosecution has elected to blame Williams for failing to raise the issue of sexual abuse at his trial. “Instead,” says deputy district attorney Ronald Eisenberg, “[Williams] chose to present false testimony that he wasn’t there.” However, Williams lawyers explain that the reason it took Williams so long to reveal his abused history is because he was frightened and ashamed, as are most child victims of rape.
On another occasion, Eisenberg called Williams’ plea for clemency a “massive public relations campaign.” Eisenberg’s remarks echo the prosecution’s belief that Williams’ alleged abuse is unimportant in deciding whether he lives or dies. In a statement following the rejection of clemency, district attorney Seth Williams accused Terry Williams “of manipulative and malevolent behavior,” calling his claims of sexual abuse “a last ditch effort to escape punishment for his crime.”
Shawn Nolan, another one of Williams attorneys, has expressed outrage at the prosecution’s argument, saying in a statement, “It is unconscionable that district attorney Seth Williams, who considers himself an advocate and defender of victims of abuse, has allowed prosecutors to characterize the evidence in this case as a ‘gay prostitute rage defense.’”
As a child, Williams was no stranger to abuse by older men in positions of authority. The clemency petition filed by Williams’ attorneys describes his childhood as wrought with “abuse, neglect and deprivation,” which “made him an easy mark for sexual predators.” His mother was cruel and abusive, and his stepfather was a violent alcoholic. The sexual abuse Williams suffered began at the age of six, when he was raped by an older boy in his neighborhood. “He came home in tears, bleeding from his rectum. Terry reported the assault to his mother, who saw the blood on his backside but never even sought medical attention for her son, let alone counseling or mental health treatment,” states the clemency petition. Later, Williams was raped by his middle school teacher, Timothy Johnson, and at 16, he was gang raped by two older men in juvenile detention.
Hamilton and Amos, the men Williams ultimately killed, are described in the petition as “middle-aged sexual predators who preyed on teenage boys.” Hamilton, a prescription drug dealer, abused many teenage boys, one of whom testified in the petition. According to Williams’ defense, his attempted abuse of Williams resulted in a knife fight that ended with Hamilton’s death.
In an unprecedented outpouring of support, 36 child advocates and sexual abuse experts, 38 law professors, 48 mental health professionals, 55 religious leaders and 36 former prosecutors and judges are calling on the state of Pennsylvania to spare the life of Terrance Williams. Mamie Norwood, the elderly widow of Amos Norwood, one of the men Williams killed, is also among those calling for clemency, saying, “His execution would go against my Christian faith and my belief system.”
Furthermore, over 350,000 people have signed a petition at Change.org urging clemency. The European Union has even chimed in with an “urgent humanitarian appeal” to Corbett and the Board of Pardons, calling the case “particularly distressing because he has been reported to have been sexually abused by the person whom he murdered, a fact which appears not to have been taken into account during his trial.”
Meanwhile, in a letter sent to Corbett and the Board of Pardons, over two-dozen child advocates and sexual abuse experts argue that Williams’ actions were a direct result of sexual abuse. “Terry’s acts of violence have, alas, an explanation of the worst sort: Enveloped by anger and self-hatred, Terry lashed out and killed two of the men who sexually abused him and caused him so much pain,” they say. “Terry was left alone to develop the means to deal with the horrors of his daily life.” The letter continues:
His crimes are an undeniable reflection of this internal suffering and are directly connected to his history of abuse and trauma. The violence of his crimes is a window into the true agony with which he struggled. We are saddened by what could have become of Terry Williams’ life had someone, anyone, intervened on his behalf.
The letter also points to the significance of understanding the effects of child sex abuse in the wake of Pennsylvania’s recent sex abuse scandals involving Jerry Sandusky and the Catholic Church, saying, “In our Commonwealth, we have seen very public and analogous examples of this phenomenon as major institutions in Pennsylvania have come under scrutiny regarding the sexual abuse of children.”
Though Pennsylvania has the nation’s fourth highest number of death row inmates, prisoners are rarely executed due to a high reversal rate, making the notion that Williams is among the worst of the worst and is deserving of death absurd in the eyes of his advocates. Only three people have been executed since the state reinstated capital punishment in 1978. Williams would mark the first Pennsylvania execution in 13 years as well as the state’s first non-volunteer execution since 1962.
http://www.salon.com/2012/09/22/terry_williams_a_victim_might_be_executed/

31 August 2012

Director at Catholic Archdiocese of NY Defends Sandusky and Accuses Brutalized Children of Seducing Their Rapists 30AUG12

AS the write up states, THIS IS VILE. Shows the US Conference of Catholic Bishops still has a lot of work to do addressing the pedophilia problem with the male lead and dominated Church in America. They need to concentrate on removing the threat of, support of and continuing tolerance of pedophiles in the Church and leave the issues of family planning and birth control to the consciences and faith of Catholic women, the mainstay of the Church in America.

 

This is absolutely vile. The interview has since been taken down, but the good folks over at the Dish recorded it while it was still available. Below is the quote by Father Benedict Groeschel, the director of the Office for Spiritual Development for the Catholic Archdiocese of New York:
People have this picture in their minds of a person planning to — a psychopath. But that’s not the case. Suppose you have a man having a nervous breakdown, and a youngster comes after him. A lot of the cases, the youngster — 14, 16, 18 — is the seducer … It’s not so hard to see — a kid looking for a father and didn’t have his own — and they won’t be planning to get into heavy-duty sex, but almost romantic, embracing, kissing, perhaps sleeping but not having intercourse or anything like that.
It’s an understandable thing … there are the relatively rare cases where a priest is involved in a homosexual way with a minor. I think the statistic I read recently in a secular psychology review was about 2%. Would that be true of other clergy? Would it be true of doctors, lawyers, coaches?
Here’s this poor guy — [Penn State football coach Jerry] Sandusky — it went on for years. Interesting: Why didn’t anyone say anything? Apparently, a number of kids knew about it and didn’t break the ice. Well, you know, until recent years, people did not register in their minds that it was a crime. It was a moral failure, scandalous; but they didn’t think of it in terms of legal things.
http://dailyagenda.org/ 
 
  FROM THE DISH BY ANDREW SULLIVAN 30AUG12

Quote For The Day II

"People have this picture in their minds of a person planning to — a psychopath. But that's not the case. Suppose you have a man having a nervous breakdown, and a youngster comes after him. A lot of the cases, the youngster — 14, 16, 18 — is the seducer ... It's not so hard to see — a kid looking for a father and didn't have his own — and they won't be planning to get into heavy-duty sex, but almost romantic, embracing, kissing, perhaps sleeping but not having intercourse or anything like that.

It's an understandable thing ... there are the relatively rare cases where a priest is involved in a homosexual way with a minor. I think the statistic I read recently in a secular psychology review was about 2%. Would that be true of other clergy? Would it be true of doctors, lawyers, coaches?

Here's this poor guy — [Penn State football coach Jerry] Sandusky — it went on for years. Interesting: Why didn't anyone say anything? Apparently, a number of kids knew about it and didn't break the ice. Well, you know, until recent years, people did not register in their minds that it was a crime. It was a moral failure, scandalous; but they didn't think of it in terms of legal things," - Father Benedict Groeschel, the director of the Office for Spiritual Development for the Catholic Archdiocese of New York.
The remarks were first posted in the National Catholic Register. All links to the page seem to have been taken down since yesterday. It's a staggering insight into how the old hierarchy viewed child abuse: as essentially the child's fault and no big deal. "Poor Sandusky"? MoDo, call your office.
http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com/2012/08/how-youths-seduce-priests.html

13 July 2012

Joe Paterno, at the end, showed more interest in his legacy than Jerry Sandusky’s victims 12JUL12

WELL SAID....

By

Joe Paterno was a liar, there’s no doubt about that now. He was also a cover-up artist. If the Freeh report is correct in its summary of the Penn State child molestation scandal, the public Paterno of the last few years was a work of fiction. In his place is a hubristic, indictable hypocrite.
In the last interview before his death, Paterno insisted as strenuously as a dying man could that he had absolutely no knowledge of a 1998 police inquiry into child molestation accusations against his assistant coach, Jerry Sandusky. This has always been the critical point in assessing whether Paterno and other Penn State leaders enabled Sandusky’s crimes.
If Paterno knew about ’98, then he wasn’t some aging granddad who was deceived, but a canny and unfeeling power broker who put protecting his reputation ahead of protecting children.
If he knew about ’98, then he understood the import of graduate assistant Mike McQueary’s distraught account in 2001 that he witnessed Sandusky assaulting a boy in the Penn State showers.
If he knew about ’98, then he also perjured himself before a grand jury.
Guilty.
Paterno didn’t always give lucid answers in his final interview conducted with The Washington Post eight days before his death, but on this point he was categorical and clear as a bell. He pled total, lying ignorance of the ’98 investigation into a local mother’s claim Sandusky had groped her son in the shower at the football building. How could Paterno have no knowledge of this, I asked him?
“Nobody knew,” he said.
Everybody knew.
Never heard a rumor?
“I never heard a thing,” he said.
He heard everything.
“If Jerry’s guilty, nobody found out till after several incidents.”
Not a whisper? How is that possible?
Paterno’s account of himself is flatly contradicted in damning detail by ex FBI-director Louis Freeh’s report. In a news conference Thursday, Freeh charged that Paterno, along with athletic director Timothy Curley, university president Graham Spanier and vice president Gary Schultz, engaged in a cover-up, “an active agreement of concealment.”
Paterno was not only aware of the ’98 investigation but followed it “closely” according to Freeh. As did the entire leadership of Penn State. E-mails and confidential notes by Schultz about the progress of the inquiry prove it. “Behavior — at best inappropriate @ worst sexual improprieties,” Schultz wrote. “At min – Poor Judgment.” Schultz also wrote, “Is this opening of pandora’s box?” and “Other children?”
A May 5, 1998 e-mail from Curley to Schultz and Spanier was titled “Joe Paterno” and it says, “I have touched base with the coach. Keep us posted. Thanks.”
A second e-mail dated May 13 1998 from Curley to Schultz is titled “Jerry” and it says, “Anything new [in] this department? Coach is anxious to know where it stands.”
There is only one aspect in which the Freeh report does not totally destroy Paterno’s pretension of honesty. It finds no connection between the ’98 investigation and Sandusky’s resignation from Paterno’s staff in ’99. The report also suggests that Paterno genuinely believed the police had found no evidence of a crime.
Paterno can be forgiven for his initial denial, for refusing to believe his colleague was a child molester in ’98. What’s not forgivable is his sustained determination to lie from 2001 onward.
This is how Paterno testified in January 2011 before the grand jury. He was asked: “Other than the [2001] incident that Mike McQueary reported to you, do you know in any way, through rumor, direct knowledge or any other fashion, of any other inappropriate sexual conduct by Jerry Sandusky with young boys?”
Paterno replied, “I do not know of anything else that Jerry would be involved in of that nature, no. I do not know of it.”
Paterno’s family continued to insist Thursday via a statement that Paterno’s account was not inconsistent with the facts, and he “always believed, as we do, that the full truth should be uncovered.”
But Paterno was no more interested in the full truth than Walt Disney.
In his final interview, he played the faux-naif who insisted he had “never heard of rape and a man.” Who hadn’t followed up on McQueary’s report out of squeamishness. Who was wary of interfering in university “procedure.” Who insisted it was unfair to put Penn State on trial along with a pedophile, and that this was not “a football scandal.”
In fact, in 2001 Paterno had every reason to suspect Sandusky was a serial defiler of children. In fact, Paterno was not reluctant to interfere in university procedure; he helped dictate it. In fact, this was a football scandal. The crimes were committed by a former assistant football coach in the football building. Ten boys, and 45 criminal counts, at least five of them molested on the Penn State campus after 1998 when Paterno committed the awful misjudgment of continuing to allow Sandusky to bring boys to his locker room, so sure was he that Sandusky was “a good guy.”
We can’t un-rape and un-molest those boys. We can’t remove them from the showers and seize them back from the hands of Sandusky. That should have been an unrelenting source of rage and grief to Paterno. Yet in perhaps the most damaging observation of all, the Freeh report accuses Paterno and his colleagues of “a striking lack of empathy” for the victims.
Everything else about Paterno must now be questioned; other details about him begin to nag. You now wonder if his self-defense was all an exercise in sealing off watertight compartments, leaving colleagues on the outside to drown. You wonder if he performed a very neat trick in disguising himself as a modest and benevolent man. The subtle but constant emphasis on his Ivy League education, the insistence that Penn State football had higher standards, now looks more like rampant elitism.
Undeniably, for many years Paterno did virtuous work at Penn State. His combined winning records and graduation rates were indeed much higher than those of his peers. It’s a relevant part of the Penn State affair and worth stating, because it contributed to the institutional response. The Freeh report cited “numerous individual failings,” but it also found “weaknesses of the University’s culture, governance, administration, compliance policies and procedures for protecting children.” As other commentators have rightly observed, Paterno’s huge successes helped form those potholes. He was the university’s culture.
He was the self-appointed arbiter of character and justice in State College. He had decided Sandusky was “a good man” in 1998, and he simply found it too hard to admit he made a fatal misjudgment and gave a child molester the office nearest to his. He was more interested in protecting a cardboard cutout legacy than the flesh and blood of young men.
The only explanation I can find for this “striking lack of empathy” is self-absorption. In asking how a paragon of virtue could have behaved like such a thoroughly bad guy, the only available answer is that Paterno fell prey to the single most corrosive sin in sports: the belief that winning on the field makes you better and more important than other people.

For previous columns by Sally Jenkins, visit washingtonpost.com/jenkins.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/colleges/joe-paterno-at-the-end-showed-more-interest-in-his-legacy-than-sanduskys-victims/2012/07/12/gJQAMUX9fW_print.html