putin will love it if the drumpf/trump-pence ticket wins the election. They are soul mates, cut from the same cloth. drumpf/trump has even encouraged the Russians to hack American political parties. His associates and some campaign staff and advisers have financial ties to Russian oligarchs and their criminal activities including some in putin's inner circle. The difference is in the countries, one ruled by an autocrat, a dictator and one ruled mostly by the will of the people. America is not Russia, the American people are not sheep like the Russians. Yes, most of our politicians are controlled by the wealthy, the rich, those in power in the military-industrial complex, the bank-financial cabal, corporate America. But we have a free press, and a democratic electoral process that allows the Americans to challenge those at the top and replace politicians at every level of government who do not meet our expectations and needs. It is not a perfect system, but we make it work. donald drump/trump admires putin's autocratic rule, the repressed electorate, the restricted mass media. His policies and agenda make him a real threat to our Republic, and we can not risk even four years of a drump/trump presidency, the damage he will do will take years to recover from and some will be irreversable. Hillary Clinton is not perfect but this election has gone beyond voting for someone as the lesser of two evils. Hillary Clinton is the president we need for the next four years, drumpf/trump is just plain evil. From +POLITICO and the +Washington Post
Trump urges Russia to hack Clinton's email
The campaign later attempted to clarify Trump's remarks, saying he wanted Russia to hand over the emails if they had them.
Donald Trump invited Russia to hack Hillary Clinton's emails on Wednesday, asking one of America’s longstanding geopolitical adversaries to find “the 30,000 emails that are missing” from the personal server she used during her time as secretary of state.
“I will tell you this, Russia: If you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” the Republican nominee said at a news conference in Florida. “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”
Trump’s comments set off an immediate uproar from the Clinton campaign, which blasted the remarks as a threat to national security.
“This has to be the first time that a major presidential candidate has actively encouraged a foreign power to conduct espionage against his political opponent,” Hillary for America policy adviser Jake Sullivan said in a statement. "That’s not hyperbole, those are just the facts. This has gone from being a matter of curiosity, and a matter of politics, to being a national security issue."
“I find those kinds of statements to be totally outrageous because you’ve got now a presidential candidate who is, in fact, asking the Russians to engage in American politics,” said former CIA Director Leon Panetta, a Clinton surrogate. “I just think that’s beyond the pale.”
House Speaker Paul Ryan’s office did not mention Trump, but condemned any role for Russia in the U.S. election, with Ryan spokesman Brendan Buck saying, “Russia is a global menace led by a devious thug. Putin should stay out of this election.”
Security researchers and U.S. officials have accused Moscow of being behind the hacking of the Democratic National Committee’s emails, thousands of which WikiLeaks published on Friday. Democrats have gone further, drawing a connection between Trump’s friendly comments toward Russian strongman Vladimir Putin and the well-timed leak on the eve of Hillary Clinton’s nomination.
Trump forcefully rejected any notion that he is linked to Putin, and said the race to attribute blame for the cyberintrusion is a “sideshow” to distract from the contents of the emails, which showed Democratic Party officials privately working to help Clinton despite their public claims of neutrality.
“I don’t know who Putin is. He said one nice thing about me,” Trump said. “I never met Putin.”
Some Trump surrogates suggested his comments were a joke, but the Manhattan mogul immediately doubled down on Twitter. “If Russia or any other country or person has Hillary Clinton's 33,000 illegally deleted emails, perhaps they should share them with the FBI!,” he tweeted. Meanwhile, his running mate, Mike Pence, issued a statement with a sharply different tone, noting the FBI was investigating the hack and that if there is evidence that Russia was involved, “I can assure you both parties and the United States government will ensure there are serious consequences.”
Later Tuesday afternoon, Trump’s campaign tried to clarify his statements. Jason Miller, Trump's communications adviser, tweeted to say Trump was not calling for Russia to hack Clinton but to hand over emails to the FBI if they had them.
“To be clear, Mr. Trump did not call on, or invite, Russia or anyone else to hack Hillary Clinton’s e-mails today,” he wrote in a series of tweets. “Trump was clearly saying that if Russia or others have Clinton’s 33,000 illegally deleted emails, they should share them.”
Pence, in his statement, criticized Democrats for focusing on the source of the hack rather than its contents, saying the revelation that the DNC aided Clinton in her primary battle against Bernie Sanders should be disqualifying for the candidate. (Later Wednesday, Pence's campaign said that their statement was unconnected to Trump's press conference and drafted before it took place.)
Newt Gingrich, a Trump supporter who was on the shortlist to be Trump's running mate, said on Twitter that Trump's suggestion about Russia was in jest and that the focus should be on Clinton's use of a private email server. "The media seems more upset by Trump's joke about Russian hacking than by the fact that Hillary's personal server was vulnerable to Russia," he tweeted.
(Miller, Trump's communications adviser, referred inquiries about Gingrich’s claim it was a joke to Trump's tweet. “Trump speaks for Trump,” he wrote in an email. He also said there was “no daylight” between what Trump and Pence said about Russian hacking.)
Trump’s comments come weeks after FBI Director James Comey said investigators had found no direct evidence that Clinton’s server had been hacked, but said the agency probably would not likely see that trail. “We assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal email account,” Comey said, as he announced the FBI did not intend to recommend charges against Clinton.
The FBI did not, however, have access to Clinton’s entire email trove. As she prepared to hand over her emails to the State Department after House Republicans discovered her private account, her staff deleted more than 30,000 emails from her private server that they determined were personal in nature. At this point, it’s not clear if there are any copies of Clinton’s deleted emails that could still be hacked — Clinton’s lawyers have said the server was wiped clean, though the FBI was able to recover a number of the deleted messages.
Trump’s views on Russia have caused growing concern among Democrats and foreign policy experts for months. Trump and Putin have exchanged flattering words from afar, with Trump praising Putin as a “strong” and “powerful” leader. He also has downplayed allegations that Putin has ordered or condoned the killing of journalists.
Trump has questioned the relevance of the NATO alliance, a bulwark of trans-Atlantic security for nearly seven decades, and groused about the expense of propping up allies who don’t pay their fair share. Last week, Trump suggested the U.S. might not honor its obligation under the treaty to assist a member state that comes under foreign attack. Those words likely pleased Putin, who calls NATO an aggressive threat to his country.
Trump also has taken positions on Ukraine that are obviously to the Kremlin’s liking. His campaign blocked an effort last week to include language in the GOP platform supporting U.S. arms deliveries to Kiev to fight pro-Russian separatists in the country’s east.
On Wednesday, Trump made a drastic break from bipartisan foreign policy consensus, saying he would consider recognizing Crimea — the strategic Ukrainian peninsula Putin annexed in 2014 — as Russian territory, and might also lift U.S. sanctions imposed on Russia in response. (“We'll be looking at that. Yeah, we'll be looking," Trump said in response to a question.”)
Trump denies that he has any financial connections to Russia. On Wednesday, he said his only business dealing with the country involved his $95 million sale of a Palm Beach mansion to a Russian billionaire in 2008. But Trump has repeatedly explored real estate deals in Russia dating back to the late 1980s. Most recently, Trump chose Moscow as the host city of the 2013 Miss Universe beauty pageant, which he owned at the time. While in Moscow, Trump discussed real estate projects, including with billionaire real estate developer Aras Agalarov, whose property hosted the pageant.
Several of Trump’s advisers also have connections to Moscow and its allies. His campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, served as a political consultant to Ukraine’s former president, Viktor Yanukovych, a Putin ally who fled to Russia after he was driven out by a pro-Western uprising in March 2014. One of Trump’s few named foreign policy advisers is Carter Page, an investment banker who has worked in Moscow and has advised and invested in the state-controlled Russian energy giant Gazprom. Another Trump adviser, retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, has made several appearances on the propagandistic Kremlin-funded Russian television network RT. Last December, Flynn flew to Moscow for RT’s 10th anniversary dinner, where he donned a tuxedo and sat next to Putin at the head table.
Trump has also done business with Manhattan real estate developers who have ties to Russia and other former Soviet Republics. In 2006, Trump joined with a Manhattan development company founded by a Russian immigrant. The company, Bayrock Group, had a project to develop a luxury condominium-hotel in New York. After the project collapsed into bankruptcy, a lawsuit alleged that Bayrock had received mysterious cash infusions from Russia and Kazakhstan, and that it had given preference to an Icelandic investment firm because its key funders were known to be in Putin’s favor. (The lawsuit was ultimately settled.)
On Wednesday, even as he dismissed efforts to link him to Putin, Trump boasted that he would be “so much better for U.S.-Russian relations” than Obama or Clinton. “You can't be worse,” he said.
Trump also denied with the Russian government.
“I have nothing to do with Russia,” he said. “I said that Putin has much better leadership qualities than Obama, but who doesn't know that?”
Trump's statements follow a morning in which President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden both hammered the GOP nominee on his foreign policy views and knowledge. In separate TV interviews Wednesday, both men painted the picture of a presidential candidate dangerously in over his head on foreign policy.
“Set aside the nuclear code. What I think is scary is a president who doesn't know their stuff and doesn’t seem to have an interest in learning what they don't know,” Obama said.
Trump, in response, said Obama was the “most ignorant president in history” and touted the benefits of resetting relations with the Kremlin.
“I would treat Vladimir Putin firmly, but there is nothing I can think of that I would rather do than have Russia friendly as opposed to the way they are right now so that we can go knock out ISIS together with other people and other countries,” he said. “Wouldn't it be nice if we got along with people?”
Later, at a campaign rally in Scranton, Pennsylvania, Trump suggested U.S. officials had it wrong on the DNC hacks. "Probably it was China or somebody else. Might be a 400-pound person sitting in bed, OK? Might be. Some of the greatest hackers of all time."
Trump and Clinton, as the Republican and Democratic nominees respectively, will begin receiving classified intelligence briefings in the next few days.
Burgess Everett, Matthew Nussbaum, Cory Bennett and Louis Nelson contributed to this report.
U.S. government officially accuses Russia of hacking campaign to interfere with elections
Russian President Vladimir Putin listens to Prince Albert II of Monaco at the Kremlin on Oct. 6. (Yuri Kadobnov/AP)
The Obama administration on Friday officially accused Russia of attempting to interfere in the 2016 elections, including by hacking the computers of the Democratic National Committee and other political organizations.
The denunciation, made by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Department of Homeland Security, came as pressure was growing from within the administration and some lawmakers to publicly name Moscow and hold it accountable for actions apparently aimed at sowing discord around the election.
“The U.S. Intelligence Community is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from U.S. persons and institutions, including from U.S. political organizations,” said a joint statement from the two agencies. “. . . These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the U.S. election process.”
The public finger-pointing was welcomed by senior Democratic and Republican lawmakers, who also said they now expect the administration to move to punish the Kremlin as part of an effort to deter further acts by its hackers.
“Today was just the first step,” said Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.), a member of the Homeland Security Committee. “Russia must face serious consequences. Moscow orchestrated these hacks because [Russian President Vladimir] Putin believes Soviet-style aggression is worth it. The United States must upend Putin’s calculus with a strong diplomatic, political, cyber and economic response.”
The White House has been mulling potential responses, such as economic sanctions, but no formal recommendation to the president has been made.
The DNC publicly disclosed the intrusions in June, saying its investigation determined that Russian government hackers were behind the breach. That was followed shortly after by a major leak of DNC emails, some so embarrassing that they forced the resignation of the DNC chairwoman, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (Fla.), on the eve of the Democratic National Convention.
The administration also blamed Moscow for the hack of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and the subsequent leak of private email addresses and cellphone numbers of Democratic lawmakers.
Other leaks of hacked material followed.
The digitally purloined material has appeared on websites such as DC Leaks and WikiLeaks. It has included the private emails of former secretary of state Colin Powell and aides to former secretary of state and Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.
An online persona calling himself Guccifer 2.0 has claimed responsibility for posting the material. Those sites and that persona are “consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts,” the joint statement said. “. . . We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia’s senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.”
The Kremlin on Friday dismissed the administration’s accusation.
“This is some sort of nonsense,” said Dmitry Peskov, press secretary for Putin. “Every day, Putin’s site gets attacked by tens of thousands of hackers. Many of these attacks can be traced to U.S. territory. It’s not as though we accuse the White House or Langley of doing it each time it happens.”
Hours after the administration called out Russia, WikiLeaks released some 2,000 emails apparently hacked from the personal Gmail inbox of Clinton’s campaign chairman, John Podesta. They included excerpts of speeches Clinton made to Wall Street banks that she had resisted making public. In one of them, she said that Wall Street knew best how it should be regulated. The campaign has not acknowledged the excerpts’ authenticity. There was no immediate word from the FBI as to whether the Russians were behind the alleged hack.
The Obama administration noted that attempts to interfere in other countries’ political processes are not new to Moscow. Russian hackers have used hacking and other techniques to influence public opinion in Europe and Eurasia, it noted. On the eve of a critical post-revolution presidential vote in Ukraine in 2014, for instance, a digital assault nearly crippled the website of the country’s central election commission.
The intelligence community has for weeks been confident that hackers tied to Russian spy agencies were behind the DNC hack. Senior officials at the Justice Department and DHS pressed the White House to go public with an accusation.
But a number of administration officials were worried that such a statement would appear to politicize the issue in the weeks before the election. They were also concerned about the Kremlin’s reaction and about inadvertently disclosing sensitive intelligence sources and methods.
“Is it in our interest to act?” Lisa O. Monaco, Obama’s adviser on counterterrorism and homeland security, said at a Washington Post cybersecurity summit Thursday. “The primary guiding and overarching focus in these discussions is: What is in the national security interest of the United States? That’s the North Star for those discussions.”
Senior administration officials in recent weeks had begun to hint that a public attribution might be coming.
“We know Russia is a bad actor in cyberspace, just as China has been, just as Iran has been,” Monaco said at a cybersecurity conference at the Center for Strategic and International Studies last month. “Nobody should think that there is a free pass when you’re conducting malicious cyber-activity.”
Assistant Attorney General John Carlin said at the same event that the message to countries, such as Russia, that attempt to meddle in the U.S. election is, “You can and will be held accountable.”
With the public naming of Moscow, the administration has now officially called out all its major nation-state foes in cyberspace: China, Iran, North Korea and Russia. But among the four, Russia is the only government that has not been subject to a deterrent measure.
The administration has a range of options, including economic sanctions for malicious cyber-activity, a new tool created by the president that has yet to be used. The Justice Department could bring indictments for hacking. The National Security Agency could take a covert action in cyberspace to send a signal to the Kremlin. Or the State Department can decide to eject Russian diplomats.
Jason Healey, a senior research scholar on cyber-issues at Columbia University, said the Pentagon’s Cyber Command should disrupt Russian hacking operations. “Go after their command and control,” he said. “ ‘Counteroffensive’ is the key word here.”
Rep. Adam B. Schiff of California, the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, urged the administration to work with European allies to develop a “concerted” response, whether it involves economic sanctions or other measures.
“The best way to push back,” Schiff said, “is in a truly international effort to let the Russians know there will be costs to this latest form of cyber-aggression against others.”
David Filipov contributed to this report.
Read more:
No comments:
Post a Comment