NORTON META TAG

Showing posts with label lebensraum. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lebensraum. Show all posts

01 March 2013

UPDATE: Here’s the video of Turkey’s prime minister comparing Zionism to fascism & Kerry scolds Turkish leader for comment about Zionism 28FEB&1MAR13

THE inclusion of Zionism as a crime against humanity reminds me of when, in the 70's, the UN General Assembly passed a resolution equating Zionism as a form of racism. I can still hear Chevy Chase, doing the "news" on Saturday Night Live, reporting on the resolution, saying something like 'This week the UN General Assembly passed a resolution equating Zionism with racism. When asked to comment, Black entertainer Sammy Davis Jr, a convert to Judaism, said What a breakthrough, now I can hate myself!'. The World laughed, nervously, understanding the resolution was nothing more than an expression of the racism it "condemned", and had no purpose other than encouraging ignorance, prejudice and hatred among the peoples of the Middle East. Turkish PM Erdogan is an intelligent man and as a leader of a democratic nation should know he doesn't have to pander to radical extremist to maintain stability and legitimacy, unlike the leaders of Iran and Saudi Arabia.  In fact, in his speech he condemns "islamic" terrorism  and he states "islamic" terrorist do not follow the teachings of Islam. His misguided comments on Zionism (using the political definition of the word) seem to be an expression of frustration with the stalemate in Israeli-Palestinian peace talks and the Israeli government's refusal to negotiate on their West Bank settlement policy, which many view the same as nazi germany's lebensraum policy. He didn't call for the elimination of Israel, the Jewish people or for support of groups and countries with that goal. PM Erdogan should issue a clarification of his remarks on Zionism to quell this controversy before it becomes justification for violence between Israel and Gaza and the West Bank or attacks on Jewish organizations and people around the world. For more information on Zionism, lebensraum and the origins of Semitic peoples see Wikipedia's pages http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zionism and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebensraum and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semitic_people 







Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan gave a speech to a United Nations body in Vienna in which he compared Zionism, the ideology behind the creation of a Jewish state, to fascism. He compared it to Islamophobia as well. “We must consider — just like Zionism or anti-Semitism or fascism — Islamophobia as a crime against humanity.”
Yes, that’s right: he condemned anti-Semitism and Zionism in the same sentence. Does condemning Zionism make you anti-Semitic? Not in Erdogan’s mind, it seems. That’s not a question for me to parse, but it’s worth noting that a lot of people seem to perceive any condemnation of Zionism as a condemnation of, if not all Jews, then certainly the ones living in Israel. And that’s the point. Causing offense to Israelis and concern among Turkey’s Western allies would seem to be an entirely foreseeable consequence of comparing Zionism to fascism. So why say it?
The video of his speech is above (flip ahead to 8:00) and a partial transcript (source: the New York Times’s Robert Mackey) is below. But first, here are the three things I find really puzzling about this.
1) Erdogan’s speech was about, and you can’t top this irony, combatting racism and discrimination based on religion. “We see racist attacks on the rise in the world,” he said, specifically discussing attacks on Muslims. Again, whether or not Erdogan meant to attack Jews or Israelis in general, he had to know that his comments would be taken that way. Is he just not aware of that apparent contradiction? Or was this comment meant as a deliberate rhetorical jab at Israel, with which Erdogan’s Turkey has had a bumpy relationship?
2) Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu condemned Erdogan’s comments. From here, does the Turkish prime minister find some way to calm things down – presumably by walking back the comment – or is this the start of yet another minor downturn in the relationship?
3) Israel and Turkey have some important shared interests in the region, which are only going to become more important as Syria continues to spiral out of control. Those shared interests are probably why, despite the leaders’ obvious distrust of one another, the two countries have kept things basically civil and occasionally productive. This is a minor test to that relationship, but it will be interesting to see the degree to which Israeli-Turkish ties do or do not break down.
Here’s the relevant section from his speech:
In addition to indifference vis-à-vis the Muslim countries, we also see harsh, offending, insulting behavior towards Muslims who live in countries other than their own, and this continues to be an unconscionable act that has been ongoing around the world.
We should be striving to better understand the beliefs of others but instead we see that people act based on prejudice and exclude others and despise them. And that is why it is necessary that we must consider — just like Zionism or anti-Semitism or fascism — Islamophobia as a crime against humanity.
There is an interesting little side story to this controversy in the Post http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/li... 
LIBYA claims the Christians that are being held by the government are being deported for entering the country illegally. Considering they were proselytizing there is reason to suspect that is in fact the reason for their detention and deportation. It is worth noting that in Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan's speech to the UN Conference of Civilizations he mentioned islamophobia in western countries but did not mention the persecution of and discrimination against Christians in Muslin nations. That is a sad omission in a speech addressing intolerance. One also has to wonder if Sec of State Kerry will address the plight of the Christian community in any of the countries of the the Middle East he will visit, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Abu Dhabi and Qatar, or if the profit margins of corporate America and the US military-industrial complex will trump human rights and freedom of religion as guaranteed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights? Stupid question, eh? 
By the by, Israel is also guilty of persecution of and discrimination against Christians in Israel and the occupied territories, see the latest report from the US State Depthttp://www.unhcr.org/refworld/country,,USDOS,,ISR,,502105b15f,0.html 
Will this ever be addressed by any American politician? Doubtful.....

Kerry scolds Turkish leader for comment about Zionism

By Anne Gearan, Published: March 1

ANKARA, Turkey —Secretary of State John F. Kerry scolded Turkey’s leader Friday for likening Zionism to a “crime against humanity,” saying such remarks complicate efforts to forge Mideast peace.
Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s comment has widened his country’s rift with Israel, with which the moderate Muslim-majority nation once had cordial relations. It also forced Kerry to publicly chastise an important ally straddling the Middle East and Europe.
“Obviously, we not only disagree,” Kerry told reporters, “we found it objectionable.” He said that efforts to promote tolerance and peace would become “more complicated in the aftermath of a speech such as the one we heard.’’
Erdogan had told the U.N. Alliance of Civilizations meeting in Vienna on Wednesday: “Just as with Zionism, anti-Semitism and fascism, it has become necessary to view Islamophobia as a crime against humanity.”
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu condemned the reference to Zionism as a “dark and mendacious statement, the likes of which we thought had passed from the world.”
The tensions with Erdogan marked the second sour note in as many days for Kerry, whose first foreign trip has been dominated by the growing crisis in Syria, which borders Turkey. The growing strains between Turkey and Israel have dismayed U.S. officials who had hoped that Turkey might be a democratic example for Arab states and a go-between in disputes with the West.
Zionism is a form of Jewish nationalism that began in the 19th century with support for the creation of a Jewish state. While the movement arose in part as a response to anti-Semitism, some critics have adopted the term to denounce Israel’s policies in the occupied territories.
Erdogan is a vocal Islamist, a departure from Turkey’s history of firmly secular democratic rule. He often appears to play to ­anti-Israeli sentiment among the
majority-Muslim Turks, and U.S. leaders of both political parties have found him touchy and unpredictable.
For his part, Erdogan has found the United States less cooperative than he hoped in ending the two-year-old conflict in Syria.
Turkey is the first Muslim country Kerry has visited as secretary, but the visit played out awkardly. Before meeting with the Turkish leader, Kerry said that the death of a Turkish security guard last month in an attack on the U.S. Embassy in Ankara served as reminder that it is important “to promote a spirit of tolerance.’’
“And that includes all of the public statements made by all leaders,” Kerry said. He said he would raise the matter directly with Erdogan.
The meeting itself began with the sometimes irascible Turkish leader noting coldly that Kerry was late. Kerry apologized, and added that he had just finished a productive meeting with Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu.
“You must have spoken about everything, so there is nothing left for us to talk about,” Erdogan replied through a translator.
He did not smile when Kerry tried to lighten the mood.
Israeli forces killed nine Turks in 2010 during the storming of a Palestinian aid ship that tried to break through an Israeli blockade of the Gaza Strip.
“We have never been hostile against a nation, against a state, against an individual,” Davutoglu said after his meetings with Kerry. “However, if we need to speak about a very hostile practice, I would refer you to the killing of nine civilians on open waters.”
The United States is one of three NATO nations that have deployed Patriot missile interceptors along Turkey’s 550-mile border with Syria. Erdogan had asked for the support but wanted more — a sentiment not unlike that voiced this week by a U.S.-backed Syrian opposition leader who angrily demanded of Kerry more help than the visiting secretary of state has offered.
Erdogan also has advocated a buffer zone to protect refugees inside Syria, something the United States rejected as unworkable. Turkey has taken in more than 200,000 Syrian refugees during a two-year civil war that has killed some 70,000 people.
Kerry heads next to Egypt, arriving at a time of prolonged political instability that could blunt Egypt’s traditional power as a Mideast peace broker.
Tensions between the Islamist backers of President Mohamed Morsi and a broad but disorganized liberal opposition have periodically spiraled into days of protests and violent street clashes. Popular frustration with rising inflation and joblessness, growing insecurity, and a lack of accountability and justice have also fueled violent clashes between protesters and police in recent weeks and have added to the growing force of Morsi’s opposition.
Two of Egypt’s top opposition leaders turned down invitations to meet with Kerry during his visit, local news media reported. The National Salvation Front, headed by Nobel laureate Mohamed ElBaradei, cited “blatant American interference in Egypt’s internal affairs” in rejecting a meeting, the state-run al-Ahram newspaper reported Thursday.
Egyptian liberal and leftist opposition leaders have grown increasingly critical of the United States since Morsi won Egypt’s first democratic presidential election last summer. His rivals have accused Washington of supporting Morsi and his Muslim Brotherhood, which the opposition says have ignored alternate political voices in a drive to dominate Egypt’s government institutions.
Abigail Hauslohner in Cairo contributed to this report.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/kerry-scolds-turkish-leader-for-disparaging-zionism/2013/03/01/90c2c4fc-8284-11e2-b99e-6baf4ebe42df_print.html 

31 January 2013

UN Panel: Israeli Settlements Are Illegal 31JAN13

ISRAEL'S West Bank settlement policy is no different than nazi Germany's policy of lebensraum, it is a violation of the human rights of the Palestinian residents of the West Bank and a violation of the Geneva Convention and International law. Many are appalled that such a comparison is made, but the egregious adoption of some fascist nazi policies that were used against European Jews by the Israeli government is disturbing and disappointing. Israel is entitled to exist in peace within secure borders and to defend itself. Israel is also obligated to uphold the Geneva Convention and International law and the human rights as established in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of all under it's control. The illegal West Bank settlements will continue to deny peace, security and human rights to Israelis and Palestinians as long as they exist. We can only hope that the recent election in Israel will force the government to reconsider it's policies. This from HuffPost....

GENEVA -- The United Nations' first report on the broad policy of Israeli settlements concluded Thursday that the government's practice of "creeping annexation" clearly violates the human rights of Palestinians, and called for an immediate halt.
In its report to the 47-nation Human Rights Council, a panel of investigators said Israel is violating international humanitarian law under the Fourth Geneva Convention, one of the treaties that establish the ground rules for what is considered humane during wartime.
The Israeli government has persisted in settling Palestinian-occupied territories, including East Jerusalem and the West Bank, "despite all the pertinent United Nations resolutions declaring that the existence of the settlements is illegal and calling for their cessation," the report said.
The settlements are "a mesh of construction and infrastructure leading to a creeping annexation that prevents the establishment of a contiguous and viable Palestinian State and undermines the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination," it concludes.
French judge Christine Chanet, who led the panel, said Israel never cooperated with the probe, which the council ordered last March. At a news conference, she called the report "a kind of weapon for the Palestinians" if they want to take up their grievances before The Hague-based International Criminal Court.
In December, after winning de facto U.N. recognition of statehood, the Palestinians accused Israel of planning more "war crimes" by expanding Jewish settlements.
Because it was not authorized to investigate within Israel, Chanet said, the panel had to travel to Jordan to interview more than 50 people who spoke of the impact of the settlements, such as violence by Jewish settlers, confiscated land and damage to their olive trees that help support them.
Another panel member, Pakistani lawyer Asma Janangir, said the settlements "seriously impinge on the self-determination of the Palestinian people," an offense under international humanitarian law.
The panel's report to the U.N.'s top human rights body immediately drew the condemnation of Israel, whose foreign ministry accused the council of taking a systematically one-sided and biased approach towards Israel, with the report being merely "another unfortunate reminder" of that bias.
"The only way to resolve all pending issues between Israel and the Palestinians, including the settlements issue, is through direct negotiations without pre-conditions," the ministry said. "Counterproductive measures – such as the report before us – will only hamper efforts to find a sustainable solution to the Israel-Palestinian conflict."
The Geneva-based U.N. council was set up in 2006 to replace a 60-year-old commission that was widely discredited as a forum dominated by nations with poor human rights records.
Earlier this week, Israel became the first nation to skip a review of its human rights record by the council without giving a reason. Diplomats agreed to postpone their review until later this year based on Israel's request for a deferral.
The council, which could have proceeded with the review or canceled it, said its agreement to defer would set precedent for how to deal with any future cases of "non-cooperation." All 193 U.N.-member nations are required to submit to such a review every four years, and council diplomats said they worried that if nation were let off the hook that could undermine the process.