BUCKNACKT'S SORDID TAWDRY BLOG
We should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive & well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, chocolate, bier or wein in hand, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "WHOO-HOO, WHAT A RIDE!!!!!!"
MORE and more neo-nazi fascist trunt maxie miller r-OH is being exposed as the no class drippings he is, totally unacceptable to be a member of congress except as a member of the gop / guardians of pedophiles & sexual predators rape-ublican party endorsed by convicted rapist, child molester and felon NOT MY pres drumpf/trump. These people are disgusting and we the people need to vote them out of office on Tuesday, 3 November, 2026. This from The Guardian.....
Republican congressman publicly shared links to evidence his team compiled in response to domestic abuse allegations
Shrai Popat in Washington
Thu 13 Aug 2026 1225 EDT
Emily Moreno, the ex-wife of Max Miller, has sued the embattled Republican congressman and his lawyer for uploading a picture of their infant daughter to a publicly accessible Dropbox folder as part of their custody battle.
The complaint argues that Miller “recklessly published and disclosed to the world a nude image” of their daughter. The photos in the lawsuit were part of a tranche of evidence that Miller’s team compiled in response to the domestic abuse allegations the lawmaker is facing following his divorce. Those allegations include holding a gun to Moreno’s head, pouring boiling water on her, and actions that resulted in his two-year-old daughter’s collarbone being broken, all of which Miller denies.
Miller, who is seeking re-election in Ohio, has faced a wave of calls to resign, including from members of his own party and his father-in-law, Bernie Moreno, a Republican senator. However, Donald Trump has remained largely supportive of the congressman, who represents a conservative district, and there are reports that the White House squashed efforts to replace him on the ballot in November’s midterm election.
The suit alleges that Miller “so desperately wanted to salvage his political job” that he “recklessly and intentionally” provided his lawyer (Aaron Minc) with “a trove of documents and photos, indifferent about what they contained or how they were used”.
Miller then shared the link to the files online after he went live on social media to deny the allegations against him on 2 August. Moreno’s lawyers note that “more than 400,000 people saw or interacted with” Miller’s posts containing the Dropbox folder.
The lawsuit – filed in US district court for the northern district of Ohio – demands the court award $150,000 in damages for “every time someone accessed, transferred, distributed, published, or downloaded the image” of their daughter.
At the time, Minc had accepted sole responsibility for inadvertently releasing the unredacted image of Moreno and Miller’s daughter in the files.
The Guardian has approached both Miller and Minc for their response to the latest lawsuit.
Brian Poindexter, the Democrat running against Miller in November, has ramped up attacks on his opponent. “No one credibly accused of holding a gun to his wife’s head and breaking their two-year-old daughter’s collarbone belongs in the halls of power,” he said recently on X.
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has also seized on the moment to add Poindexter to the “Red to Blue” program, which identifies districts the party thinks can be flipped from Republicans to the party for congressional control.
AS the Church Lady would say "Bye Bye Bill, Bye bye.....". Good riddance to this loud mouth, fascist liar, this serial sexual predator, this domestic abuser. One can only wonder about the morality of fox news and why it took them so long? The answer of course is money. They tolerated him as long as he was bringing in the money but once that started to go away it was decided bill o'reilly had to go. So all the bull about a change in corporate attitude at fox is just that, bull. From +NPR and +Mother Jones ...... Bill O'Reilly Is Out At Fox News
Fox News is parting ways with Bill O'Reilly, who for years stood as one of cable news' most popular hosts. The network's parent company, 21st Century Fox, announced the move in a statement Wednesday.
"After a thorough and careful review of the allegations, the Company and Bill O'Reilly have agreed that Bill O'Reilly will not be returning to the Fox News Channel," the statement read.
O'Reilly released a statement, calling it "tremendously disheartening that we part ways due to completely unfounded claims. But that is the unfortunate reality many of us in the public eye must live with today."
The host's top-rated program, The O'Reilly Factor, had recently suffered an exodus of advertisers amid revelations that O'Reilly, Fox News and 21st Century Fox had quietly paid out roughly $13 million in settlements to five women who had accused him of sexual harassment.
Several weeks ago, a woman named Wendy Walsh stepped forward with another complaint against O'Reilly. NPR's David Folkenflik reports that Walsh went through Fox News' formal complaint process, alleging O'Reilly made unwelcome advances during what she believed to be a business dinner.
"It was a sad cocktail party story that women tell each other and shrug our shoulders and go, 'Ugh, another one,' " Walsh told NPR earlier this month. "I can't believe this is still going on."
The New York Times reports that an African-American woman — who remains anonymous — came forward this week with allegations of her own, saying O'Reilly would at various times grunt like a "wild boar" at her desk, leer at her and refer to her as "hot chocolate."
O'Reilly has largely remained quiet in the face of these accusations, though he has rejected them and said he agreed to the settlements only to protect his family.
His lawyer has come out more forcefully, however.
"Bill O'Reilly has been subjected to a brutal campaign of character assassination that is unprecedented in post-McCarthyist America," Marc Kasowitz said in a statement. "This law firm has uncovered evidence that the smear campaign is being orchestrated by far-left organizations bent on destroying O'Reilly for political and financial reasons. That evidence will be put forth shortly, and it is irrefutable."
O'Reilly has enjoyed support in the White House, as well.
"I don't think Bill did anything wrong," President Trump told the Times in an interview earlier this month. "Personally, I think he shouldn't have settled."
Yet the allegations against O'Reilly fit into an uncomfortable narrative for the cable news network. As David notes, the revelations came less than a year after his former boss, Roger Ailes, saw his tenure at the top of Fox News unravel under separate sexual harassment allegations:
"The real subtext to all this is that Roger Ailes, the founding chairman, the creative drive behind the success of Fox, was forced out last summer for sexual harassment. And right now, Fox is under the gun for this and also under a federal inquiry to see if it hid payments to women to try to keep it a secret — not only from the public but from shareholders, which could constitute a federal crime."
Up to last week, the effects O'Reilly's scandal had on his program appeared mixed.
Yet his ratings did not seem to suffer, still easily hovering at the top of the cable news landscape even amid the poor press.
O'Reilly — who has denied the claims — has been off the air since last week, when he announced he would be taking a vacation. At the time, O'Reilly said he planned to return to the program on April 24. It remains unclear whether the network will allow the host to say a farewell of his own on-air.
Tucker Carlson will replace O'Reilly in the 8 p.m. ET time slot.
Here's what O'Reilly called us--and why we're proud of it.
It's official: Bill O'Reilly is out at Fox News. This comes in the wake of reports of multiple sexual harassment complaints against him, as well as a social-media push for a boycott against his show. You can read more about those developments here.
For us at Mother Jones, though, one element of the O'Reilly saga jumps out: How consistently he (and Fox News) denied not only the harassment allegations, but his journalistic missteps. O'Reilly has also violated basic standards in a way that would end the careers of many other journalists. Perhaps the most memorable of these episodes involved his repeated claims that he had been in "war zones" and "combat."
In 2015, MoJo's David Corn and Daniel Schulman broke the story that while O'Reilly's has said he was "in the Falklands" during the 1982 war between the United Kingdom and Argentina, and that he saw "combat" there, the closest he came to covering that conflict was a protest in Buenos Aires, Argentina. In response to the exhaustively researched article, O'Reilly called David a "liar," "far-left assassin," and "despicable guttersnipe."
What's so interesting about that moment is that it prefigured the "post-truth" approach to the facts that we saw play out in the 2016 campaign: If you repeat an untruth loudly enough and often enough, some people will believe it. It will take on a life of its own. "In a way, it's impossible to win a debate with O'Reilly," David wrote presciently at the time, "because he is not bound by reality." So when the sexual harassment allegations—complete with detailed accounts by multiple women—came out: O'Reilly and Fox News both insisted that none of this could possibly have happened. (Notice the echoes of Trump and his friend, former Fox News CEO Roger Ailes, who have insisted that the women who accused them of harassment were making it up.)
But here's the thing that acolytes of the "post-truth" school forget: The truth is slow, sometimes quiet, sometimes not aggressive enough. But it is tough as nails. Denying it doesn't make it go away; it just pushes it underground—for a while. Eventually, it will win out. And when the post-truthers of the world call reporters "guttersnipes" for digging up the facts, we wear that badge with pride.
Sincerely,
Monika Bauerlein, Chief Executive Officer Mother Jones
I sent the below to Loudoun Now... rep barbara comstock r VA pretended to be offended by donald drumpf's/trump's admission of sexual assault and sexist, misogynist comments in the drumpf/trump sex video. She wasn't offended by his racism, bigotry, xenophobia, homophobia, islamaphobia, or by his support (tolerated by the drumpf/trump-pence campaign) from the kkk and other white supremacist hate groups, at least not enough to call on drumpf/trump to withdraw from the race for president. Rep comstock was offended by his misogyny and sexual assault(s?) until she won re-election. Now, with donald drumpf/trump naming known racist, sexist, and domestic abuser steve bannon as his chief White House Strategist Rep comstock remains silent. Either Rep comstock supports (and holds) bannon's (and so drumpf's/trump's and pence's) deplorable opinions and attitudes and so remains silent OR Rep comstock will take a stand for all her constituents and denounce steve bannon and call on drumpf/trump to remove him as his chief White House strategist and keep bannon from any office and position in his administration. Rep comstock's response to steve bannon's appointment will tell us what kind of person she really is. MY LETTER TO LOUDOUN NOW ENDS HERE. The below is from UltraViolet, +snopes and the +The Guardian
A known white supremacist, anti-Semite, and domestic abuser is about to become the White House chief strategist.
Can you write a short letter to the local newspaper to demand your Representative stop him?
It's been nine days since Donald Trump announced Steve Bannon--known white supremacist, anti-Semite, and domestic abuser--as his pick for White House chief strategist, and your representative, hasn't done anything to stop it from happening.1
This week our Representatives and Senators are away from Washington. That means if people show they reject Bannon yours will listen. You can help by writing a short letter to the editor--politicians care deeply about the opinion pages.
A few letters can make a big impression on politicians. It takes a just a minute, and we've made it really easy to write and send through our website. But to get it in the paper this weekend, you'll need to send it right away!
Write in your own voice and use these points to make your case:
People all over, including your constituents, oppose Steve Bannon's appointment. Why aren't you one of the lawmakers who is trying to stop a rabid racist and misogynist from getting to the White House?
No decent person, Republican or Democrat, should allow Bannon in the highest level of government. Stop putting party over decency.
You have every power to stop Bannon from reaching the White House, starting with publicly denouncing him.
If you represent the people, speak up now--denounce Donald Trump's appointment of known white supremacist and domestic abuser, Steve Bannon.
In a 20-year-old police report, Trump strategist Steve Bannon was accused of grabbing his former wife by the neck and wrist, but the case was later dismissed.
On New Year's Day 1996, Santa Monica police were called to the home of Steve Bannon and his then-wife, Mary Louise Piccard, on reports of domestic violence. According to documents provided by the city, Bannon was charged with three misdemeanor counts relating to the incident, but the case was ultimately dismissed because Piccard did not appear for trial.
According to the report, Bannon had been physically violent with Piccard in the beginning of their relationship, but had stopped for roughly four years (with the help of counseling). However, on 1 January 1996, Piccard apparently answered the door in tears when a Santa Monica police officer responded to a 911 hang-up call from the home.
The officer wrote:
Her husband and father of the twins is Stephen Bannon. Mrs. Bannon said she has been seeing Mr. Bannon for approximately 6 1/2 years. In the beginning of their relationship, she said they [had] 3 or 4 arguments that became physical, and they have been going to counseling. There has not been any physical abuse in their arguments for about the past 4 years. Mrs. Bannon said they have been arguing a lot, but not violence.
The police report goes on to note that Bannon had slept on the couch on New Years Eve, the night before the alleged violence. He became upset with Piccard when she asked to use a credit card to go grocery shopping. The altercation escalated until Piccard told him she wanted a divorce.
[Piccard] said she spit at him, and [he] reached up to her from the driver's seat of his car and grabbed her left wrist. He pulled her down, as if he was trying to pull into the car, over the door. [Piccard] said Mr. Bannon grabbed at neck, also pulling her into the car. She said that she started to fight back, striking at his face, so he would let go of her. After a short period of time she was able to get away from him.
She ran back into the house, where the couple's children were, and tried to call 911, but Bannon jumped over her and the twins, grabbed the phone and threw it across the room before leaving the home, according to the report. He was charged with misdemeanor witness intimidation, domestic violence with traumatic injury and battery. he pleaded not guilty. The case was dismissed when Piccard didn't appear for trial; the couple ultimately divorced.
On 13 November 2016, Bannon was selected by President-elect Donald Trump to serve as his chief White House strategist, prompting questions about whether previous media reports about the case were true. Bannon led Breitbart after death of its founder, Andrew Breitbart, in 2012, until Trump tapped him to head his campaign in August 2016.
A representative for Bannon has not yet responded to our request for comment.
Lindsey Graham, Marco Rubio and others are staying neutral on the controversial Trump appointment: ‘The president has a right to choose his staff’
Republicans declined to criticize Donald Trump’s decision to appoint Steve Bannon as the chief strategist to his impending administration, despite the latter’s record of promoting white supremacy.
As lawmakers returned to Washington on Tuesday for the first time since Trump’s victory in the US presidential election, Democrats swiftly called on the president-elect to rescind his hiring of Bannon.
But Republicans said it was time to unify behind Trump and sidestepped questions on his promotion of antisemitic, anti-Muslim and misogynist content while overseeing the “alt-right” website Breitbart News.
“I don’t want to accuse a man of being antisemitic or racist whom I’ve never met,” said Lindsey Graham, a senator from South Carolina told reporters on Capitol Hill when asked about the Bannon appointment.
“I’ve never met him. I wouldn’t know him if he walked in the door,” he said, before adding of Breitbart: “The website in question was a friendly site to the alt-right. I don’t like them and they don’t like me and I’m glad.”
Marco Rubio said he had “no reaction” to the Bannon news, even though the former Breitbart chairman used his website to try to undermine the Florida senator’s political career.
“The president has a right to choose his own staff,” said Rubio, who ran unsuccessfully against Trump for the Republican nomination but was re-elected to a second term in the Senate last week.
Rubio also dismissed speculation that he might serve in Trump’s cabinet, saying he had not spoken with the president-elect’s transition team and would “prefer to be in the Senate”.
Trump’s move to elevate Bannon, who served as the CEO to his presidential campaign, sparked immediate backlash on Monday. (Though not from white supremacists groups, who celebrated it.)
A sampling of the headlines under his stewardship at Breitbart were rapidly circulated. They included articles asserting that birth control made women “unattractive and crazy”, referring to neoconservative commentator Bill Kristol as a “renegade Jew”, and likening Gabby Giffords, the former Arizona congresswoman who in 2011 was shot in the head, to a “human shield” for the gun control movement.
The website’s former use of a “black crime” topic tag was also highlighted, as was its portrayal of immigrants and Muslims as communities to be feared.
Harry Reid, the outgoing Senate Democratic leader, said on Tuesday in a Senate floor speech that Trump should sever his ties with Bannon rather than installing him at the highest levels of the White House.
“If Trump is serious about seeking unity, the first thing he should do is rescind his appointment of Steve Bannon … As long as a champion of racial division is a step away from the Oval Office it will be impossible to take Trump’s efforts to heal the nation seriously.”
Republicans urged the American public to give Trump an opportunity to lead while expressing confidence that the real estate mogul’s divisive campaign rhetoric was a tool of the past.
“The president is going to be judged on his results,” the House speaker, Paul Ryan, told reporters.
Of Bannon, who has personally attacked the House speaker and even promoted his primary challenger on Breitbart, Ryan added: “This is a person who helped [Trump] win an incredible victory and an incredible campaign.”
“Give him a chance, see how he’s going to govern,” said Ron Johnson, a senator from Wisconsin, about both Trump’s tenor toward minorities and association with Bannon.
Republicans such as Graham and Rubio cited Barack Obama as an example of how the American people should rally behind Trump.
“This is important – he’s won, we want him to be successful, because that’s good for America,” Rubio told the Guardian.
Asked about concerns among minorities, Rubio said he was encouraged to see Trump’s vow to be “a president for all Americans” in his election night acceptance speech and other recent interviews such as on CBS’s 60 Minutes.
“It’s a message he’s now echoed a number of times,” the senator said. “But ultimately, I think he’s aware that it is his responsibility as president-elect to address these concerns and he’s trying, from what I’ve seen.”
Graham confessed he had not been a passenger on what he dubbed as “the Trump train” during the election, but said he was prepared to work with his former rival on issues such as infrastructure and defense spending.
But Graham, among the leading defense hawks in Congress, warned he would not entertain Trump’s desire to forge a relationship with the Russian president, Vladimir Putin.
“He wants to reset with Russia. Maybe he can do it,” Graham said. “But here’s my view about Russia: they’re a bad actor in the world and they need to be reined in.”
“He is the president of the United States, and he is the leading diplomat for the country,” the senator added of Trump, “but Congress has a role.”