NORTON META TAG

Showing posts with label American Legion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label American Legion. Show all posts

01 March 2014

#HelpVets VETS BILL DIES IN SENATE, HOW YOUR SENATOR VOTED & With just 41 votes, Republican senators block veterans benefits bill 27FEB14

SENATE repiglicans and tea-baggers put the interest of the pro Israel lobby and US military-industrial complex profit margins ahead of American veterans. They insisted on attaching an amendment to this bill that would have imposed new sanctions on Iran and pushed us closer to war with Iran. They insisted on an amendment that would have increased the probability of more American military deaths, more wounded, more disabled military service personnel, and when they didn't get their way filibustered and killed legislation that would have provided more health care, more education and more job training for American vets. They should be ashamed, and the American people and vets should remember this vote. Check out how your Senator voted below. From Sen Bernie Sanders I VT, Daily Kos and Roll Call......

Republicans Turn Their Backs on Veterans
Senate Republicans on Thursday derailed legislation to expand health care, education and job-training benefits for the nation’s 22 million veterans. “I have a hard time understanding how anyone could vote for tax breaks for billionaires, for millionaires, for large corporations and then say we don't have the resources to protect our veterans,” Bernie told the Senate before his legislation was sidetracked on a mostly party-line vote. As chairman of the Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, Bernie’s bill was backed by more than two dozen veterans’ service organizations. “I don’t know how anyone who voted ‘no’ today can look a veteran in the eye and justify that vote,” said American Legion Commander Daniel Dellinger. Bernie isn’t giving up. Just three more Republican votes are needed to pass the bill. CNN's Chris Cuomo called what happened "outrageous."
Video Watch CNN's Chris Cuomo explain the vote

Thu Feb 27, 2014 at 01:15 PM PST

With just 41 votes, Republican senators block veterans benefits bill

U.S. Senator John Cornyn speaks to the media following the weekly Republican Senate policy meeting on Capitol Hill in Washington, February 26, 2013. REUTERS/Jason Reed
AP reports on the GOP's successful filibuster of Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders' veterans benefits bill:
Senate Republicans have blocked a Democratic bill that would enrich health, education and job-training programs for the nation's 22 million veterans.
And why did Republicans—who "won" the vote because "only" 56 senators voted in favor of moving forward with the bill—decide to block it?
Republicans complained that the bill was too expensive. And they were upset that Majority Leader Harry Reid prevented a vote on a GOP amendment cutting the bill and adding sanctions against Iran for its nuclear program.
Ah yes, we mustn't be too generous when it comes to the people we ask to defend our country with their lives. Especially not when we're not even able to have a vote on an unrelated piece of legislation, even if that unrelated piece of legislation would make it more likely that we'd send even more veterans to their death, as their Iran sanctions bill would do. Lovely Republican Party, eh?
SENATE vote on S1982.
U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 113th Congress - 2nd Session
as compiled through Senate LIS by the Senate Bill Clerk under the direction of the Secretary of the Senate
Vote Summary
Question: On the Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: S.1982 )
Vote Number: 46 Vote Date: February 27, 2014, 02:26 PM
Required For Majority: 3/5 Vote Result: Motion Rejected
Measure Number: S. 1982 (Comprehensive Veterans Health and Benefits and Military Retirement Pay Restoration Act of 2014 )
Measure Title: A bill to improve the provision of medical services and benefits to veterans, and for other purposes.
Vote Counts:YEAs56

NAYs41

Not Voting3


Grouped by Home State
Alabama:Sessions (R-AL), NayShelby (R-AL), Nay
Alaska:Begich (D-AK), YeaMurkowski (R-AK), Not Voting
Arizona:Flake (R-AZ), NayMcCain (R-AZ), Nay
Arkansas:Boozman (R-AR), NayPryor (D-AR), Yea
California:Boxer (D-CA), YeaFeinstein (D-CA), Yea
Colorado:Bennet (D-CO), YeaUdall (D-CO), Yea
Connecticut:Blumenthal (D-CT), YeaMurphy (D-CT), Yea
Delaware:Carper (D-DE), YeaCoons (D-DE), Yea
Florida:Nelson (D-FL), Not VotingRubio (R-FL), Nay
Georgia:Chambliss (R-GA), NayIsakson (R-GA), Nay
Hawaii:Hirono (D-HI), YeaSchatz (D-HI), Yea
Idaho:Crapo (R-ID), NayRisch (R-ID), Nay
Illinois:Durbin (D-IL), YeaKirk (R-IL), Nay
Indiana:Coats (R-IN), NayDonnelly (D-IN), Yea
Iowa:Grassley (R-IA), NayHarkin (D-IA), Yea
Kansas:Moran (R-KS), YeaRoberts (R-KS), Nay
Kentucky:McConnell (R-KY), NayPaul (R-KY), Nay
Louisiana:Landrieu (D-LA), YeaVitter (R-LA), Nay
Maine:Collins (R-ME), NayKing (I-ME), Yea
Maryland:Cardin (D-MD), YeaMikulski (D-MD), Yea
Massachusetts:Markey (D-MA), YeaWarren (D-MA), Yea
Michigan:Levin (D-MI), YeaStabenow (D-MI), Yea
Minnesota:Franken (D-MN), YeaKlobuchar (D-MN), Yea
Mississippi:Cochran (R-MS), NayWicker (R-MS), Not Voting
Missouri:Blunt (R-MO), NayMcCaskill (D-MO), Yea
Montana:Tester (D-MT), YeaWalsh (D-MT), Yea
Nebraska:Fischer (R-NE), NayJohanns (R-NE), Nay
Nevada:Heller (R-NV), YeaReid (D-NV), Yea
New Hampshire:Ayotte (R-NH), NayShaheen (D-NH), Yea
New Jersey:Booker (D-NJ), YeaMenendez (D-NJ), Yea
New Mexico:Heinrich (D-NM), YeaUdall (D-NM), Yea
New York:Gillibrand (D-NY), YeaSchumer (D-NY), Yea
North Carolina:Burr (R-NC), NayHagan (D-NC), Yea
North Dakota:Heitkamp (D-ND), YeaHoeven (R-ND), Nay
Ohio:Brown (D-OH), YeaPortman (R-OH), Nay
Oklahoma:Coburn (R-OK), NayInhofe (R-OK), Nay
Oregon:Merkley (D-OR), YeaWyden (D-OR), Yea
Pennsylvania:Casey (D-PA), YeaToomey (R-PA), Nay
Rhode Island:Reed (D-RI), YeaWhitehouse (D-RI), Yea
South Carolina:Graham (R-SC), NayScott (R-SC), Nay
South Dakota:Johnson (D-SD), YeaThune (R-SD), Nay
Tennessee:Alexander (R-TN), NayCorker (R-TN), Nay
Texas:Cornyn (R-TX), NayCruz (R-TX), Nay
Utah:Hatch (R-UT), NayLee (R-UT), Nay
Vermont:Leahy (D-VT), YeaSanders (I-VT), Yea
Virginia:Kaine (D-VA), YeaWarner (D-VA), Yea
Washington:Cantwell (D-WA), YeaMurray (D-WA), Yea
West Virginia:Manchin (D-WV), YeaRockefeller (D-WV), Yea
Wisconsin:Baldwin (D-WI), YeaJohnson (R-WI), Nay
Wyoming:Barrasso (R-WY), NayEnzi (R-WY), Nay
Vote SummaryBy Senator NameBy Vote PositionBy Home State
  


 
http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/video-audio/helpvets?utm_source=berniebuzz&utm_medium=email&utm_content=Chris+Cuomo&utm_campaign=National+Bernie+Buzz+03-01

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/02/27/1280922/-With-just-41-votes-Republican-senators-block-veterans-benefits-bill?detail=email 

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&session=2&vote=00046 

07 February 2013

SIGN PETITION SUPPORTING CHUCK HAGEL & Chuck Hagel Nomination Draws Praise From Veterans' Groups, Adding Pressure To GOP Opposition 6FEB13

CHUCK HAGEL deserves to be Sec of Defense. He has earned, through his service to our country, the honor of leading the US Military as Sec of Defense. The national vets organizations want him to be Sec of Defense because he is one of them, has experienced the horrors of war and knows and understands the needs of the the men and women who serve and sacrifice. The real reason the gop and tea-baggers in the Senate are opposed to him is their loyalty not to the members of the American military and the nation but to the military-industrial complex, protecting their profit margins and so their own campaign contributions and executive employment in those industries once they leave politics. You can sign VoteVets petition Stand Up To Neocons Smearing Chuck Hagel to Pres Obama stating your support for Chuck Hagel here http://org2.democracyinaction.org/o/6676/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=12404
E mail your Senators and tell them to vote for Chuck Hagel for Sec of Defense at http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm This from HuffPost......
Chuck Hagel Nomination


WASHINGTON — Countering the Republican-led opposition to President Barack Obama's nominee for defense secretary is a less flashy but powerful constituency: military veterans.
Veterans' organizations have praised Chuck Hagel, a twice-wounded combat veteran of Vietnam and deputy administrator in President Ronald Reagan's Veterans Administration.
The Veterans of Foreign Wars has called him uniquely qualified to become Pentagon chief. The Military Officers Association of America said his experience gives him "a range of perspectives." The American Legion said he was a longtime advocate for veterans.
The organizations, which as congressionally chartered, stopped short of an outright endorsement.
Republican-leaning outside groups have waged a well-funded campaign against Hagel, airing television commercials, running full-page newspaper ads and expressing their opposition on local radio stations.
Officials from Americans for a Strong Defense, hoping to pressure Democratic Sen. Mark Pryor, spoke out on an Arkansas station this week.
A vote on Hagel's nomination, which had been expected on Thursday, was postponed as Republicans pressed for more answers from the nominee about his finances.
The competing pressures on lawmakers from GOP-leaning outside groups and veterans' organizations – plus Hagel's military service – explain why many Republicans have announced their opposition to Obama's choice but have shown no inclination to filibuster the nomination of their former Senate colleague, congressional aides say.
All 55 Democrats are expected to back Hagel, and Republican Sens. Thad Cochran of Mississippi and Mike Johanns of Nebraska have announced they will vote for him. Several Republicans, including McCain, have said they would oppose a filibuster.
Hagel's past votes and statements unleashed a barrage of criticism that he is too weak in his support of Israel, too tolerant of Iran and willing to slash the nation's nuclear arsenal. His halting performance at his confirmation hearing led Graham to urge the Obama administration to reconsider the nomination.
There are about 22 million veterans nationwide, and they hold considerable sway with Congress. While veterans are hardly in lockstep when it comes to a Democratic president's Cabinet choice, Hagel's personal story resonates with those who have served, says former Sen. Max Cleland, D-Ga., a triple amputee from the Vietnam War.
"He grew up in the heartland of America, goes to war, war of his generation," Cleland said in an interview. "He volunteers to walk point ... because he wants to do it on behalf of his comrades. He gets wounded twice. He still carries some of that shrapnel in his chest, and vows the second time he's wounded that if he's ever in a position to help out the grunts, the average serviceman, the combat soldier that he had served with, he will."
VoteVets, a left-leaning veterans group, has campaigned for Hagel through social media, old-fashioned letters to editors and 18,000 emails from some 9,000 people to all the members of the Senate.
Veterans are a significant part of the population in the home states of Republican senators.
McCain's home state of Arizona has 531,910 veterans, including 176,245 who served in Vietnam, according to figures compiled by the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Graham's South Carolina has 421,525 veterans, including 142,290 Vietnam vets. In Georgia, home GOP to Sen. Saxby Chambliss, there are 776,205 veterans, including 254,015 who served in Vietnam.
Texas has 1,675,689 veterans, including 560,927 from the Vietnam War. The state's two Republican senators – John Cornyn and Cruz, the newest member of the Armed Services Committee – announced their opposition to Hagel's nomination last month.
Hagel help pass an contemporary GI bill, "he was right about Iraq, he was right about Afghanistan," said Jon Soltz, who served two Army tours in Iraq and is the chairman of VoteVets. "When you look at veterans' issues and these types of things, he's been excellent to us and he's one of us. He's been there. Ted Cruz hasn't been there."
Americans for a Strong Defense, one of the outside groups, continues to focus its campaign on states with undecided senators, such as Alaska, Louisiana and Arkansas.
"We found that our grassroots efforts have intensified since Chuck Hagel's disastrous confirmation hearing," said spokesman Ryan Williams. "People are more concerned now about his nomination given the lackluster performance he delivered in front of the Senate Armed Services Committee last week."
Williams, who recently worked for Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney, said the group has reached out to local leaders to pressure senators while the organization churns out a steady stream of news releases critical of the nominee.
Danny Gonzalez of the group Move America Forward, a pro-military organization, said his group's approach is to "fire up the grassroots and get those people motivated. We're definitely going to notify our list about which senators have publicly stated they are thinking about supporting him, calling their offices, faxes, email."

04 October 2010

U.S. pays as Prudential invests troop death benefits 3OKT10

THIS is disgusting, the greed exhibited by Prudential Financial is worse than the greed of the corporate pigs at aig, bank of america, citibank, wells fargo and all that other wall street trash......
By David Evans
Bloomberg News
Sunday, October 3, 2010; G1


When Prudential Financial invests the death benefits owed to survivors of U.S. troops killed in battle, the money comes from a source with deep pockets: the federal government.
After a service member dies in combat - including the more than 4,000 who have been killed in Iraq and Afghanistan - the Department of Veterans Affairs sends Prudential the full amount of each family's life insurance coverage, usually $400,000.
The government has paid Prudential $1.7 billion for these benefits since 2003, when the war in Iraq began, according to information provided by the VA.
Prudential holds that taxpayer money, invests it and reaps the gains.
Here's how it works: If survivors request a lump-sum payment of the death benefit, Prudential opens a retained-asset account, a quasi-checking account that allows families to draw money when they are ready to spend it.
(READ: Washington Post special report on soldier's traumatic brain injuries and coming home a different person)
Until the money is used, it stays in Prudential's corporate account. There, the insurer invests it, mostly in bonds, making returns as much as eight times what it is paying out to holders of the retained-asset account.
What this means is that Prudential is investing - and profiting from - death benefits owed to service members' families, using money provided by the government.
"They have what appears to be a nice sweetheart deal with the federal government," says Michael Powers, a professor of risk management and insurance at Temple University in Philadelphia. "This strikes me as the same sort of thing as those classic stories of the government paying hundreds of dollars for a wrench or a toilet seat."
Ninety-five percent of survivors paid by Prudential ask for lump-sum payments, the VA says. Since 1999, the company has sent out more than 60,000 Alliance Account checkbooks, instead of checks, covering more than $7 billion in death benefits when families asked for full payouts.
On average, Prudential holds about 16 percent of survivors' money for at least a year, according to the company. As of June 30, Prudential had $662 million belonging to military families in its general account, the VA says.
Prudential's general account earned 4.2 percent interest in the first half of 2010, regulatory filings show. The company paid survivors holding Alliance Accounts 0.5 percent in the same period.
"It sure looks like the VA provided an ill-conceived giveaway, or that Prudential played the VA like a fool," said Steven Schooner, co-director of the Government Procurement Law Program at George Washington University. "It's a lose-lose proposition for everyone but Prudential."
Prudential spokesman Bob DeFillippo said the professor is wrong.
"Prudential assumes the vast majority of mortality risk for the participants," he says. "We also assume all of the investment risk." He declined to elaborate on what the company's insurance and investment risks are.
The VA says it is taking steps to better help survivors.
"The VA is working to ensure that all aspects of the Alliance Account and all choices to the beneficiary are made absolutely clear and that all facts concerning the administration of the accounts continue to be fully transparent and disclosed," said Thomas Lastowka, the VA director for insurance.
The VA announced on Sept. 14 that Prudential had agreed to stop automatically sending checkbooks to survivors who request a lump-sum payment. Instead, the insurer will offer families the option of receiving the full amount by check.
Decades-old law
The reason why taxpayers pick up the tab for all life insurance benefits owed to the families of troops killed in combat dates back 45 years.
Before the Vietnam War, the U.S. government ran its own life insurance programs, with separate plans specifically created for World War I, World War II and the Korean War. By 1956, the military had closed to new enrollments all of the programs insuring combat forces.
To provide coverage for troops being sent into harm's way in Vietnam, Congress adopted legislation in September 1965 - proposed by the life insurance industry - that created the Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance program.
The law required that, for the first time, the federal government would work with a life insurance company to cover war deaths. Congress also put into the law another mandate endorsed by the industry, which was concerned about the casualty rate in Vietnam.
The Life Insurance Association of America endorsed a provision guaranteeing that the government pay the full costs to the insurance company for death benefits due to families of troops killed in battle.
Nine days after President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the bill into law on Sept. 29, 1965, the VA awarded a no-bid contract to Prudential.
The first taxpayer money made its way into Alliance Accounts in 2003, as service members died in Iraq and Afghanistan, according to VA documents.
After taxpayers covered $18 million that year, annual payments to Prudential peaked at $460.9 million in 2007. Taxpayers sent Prudential $213.2 million in 2009. The seven-year total of public money going to the company was $1.7 billion, 95 percent of which went into Alliance Accounts.
Financial cushion
The VA doesn't reimburse Prudential for benefits owed to families of troops who died noncombat deaths, but it does help the insurer in another way. The agency provides a financial cushion.
To do that, it has set premium payments for service members at levels high enough to build up a so-called contingency fund, which Prudential manages. The VA says that fund held about $835 million as of June 30, 2009.
The contingency fund is too large, Lastowka said, adding that VA actuaries have determined it should hold about $230 million less. As a result, the VA lowered premium payments by 7 percent, to $26 a month, starting July 1, 2008.
In 1965, before Congress created the new insurance program, the American Legion tried to persuade lawmakers not to contract with an insurance company.
The nation's largest veterans service organization, chartered by Congress in 1919, expressed concern that the government would set and collect premiums, do record-keeping and pay for war deaths - so there would be no need for an insurance company.
"Nothing remains, really, for the commercial companies to do except realize a profit," American Legion executive John Corcoran said at a hearing on Sept. 9, 1965. "Indemnifying the lives of our servicemen and providing a degree of protection to their parents, widows and orphans is not a business transaction; it is the responsibility of the government."
Peter Gaytan, executive director of the American Legion in Washington, says the organization's position hasn't changed: "We have to overhaul the system so nobody can make profits off soldiers who died in action."