NORTON META TAG

Showing posts with label rep eric cantor r VA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rep eric cantor r VA. Show all posts

22 February 2013

House Republicans Strip Protections From LGBT Victims In New Violence Against Women Act 22FEB13

rep eric "kapo" cantor r VA is one nasty SOB. With this action on the VAWA he shows he deserves the nickname kapo, he would have handed his family over to the gestapo to save his own skin. That is what he is doing with the VAWA. He is handing the women of the LGBT community and Native American communities over to the right-wing social engineers, the extremeist, many of  whom claim to be guided by their religious beliefs, to do with them as they will because they are different and aren't the kind of women their god intended them to be and so don't deserve protection from violence. From ThinkProgress......

The Violence Against Women Act expired at the end of 2012 after House Republicans refused to accept the Senate bill’s protections for LGBT, Native American, and undocumented victims. Though the Senate passed another bipartisan VAWA reauthorization over a week ago, House Republicans may derail passage once again. On Friday, House GOP leaders released their own VAWA bill, stripping protections for LGBT individuals and adding a loophole for Native American victims.
Where the Senate bill granted access to federal grants for LGBT victims, the House bill is silent, removing all mention of “sexual orientation” or “gender identity.” As a result of this omission, LGBT-inclusive crisis centers could be shut out from essential grant programs:
The House GOP bill entirely leaves out provisions aimed at helping LGBT victims of domestic violence. Specifically, the bill removes “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” from the list of underserved populations who face barriers to accessing victim services, thereby disqualifying LGBT victims from a related grant program. The bill also eliminates a requirement in the Senate bill that programs that receive funding under VAWA provide services regardless of a person’s sexual orientation or gender identity.
The House bill also gives states some wiggle room by shifting greater authority to state government to decide which victimized groups are “underserved” and therefore deserve funding.
The Senate bill’s protections for Native American victims were also protested as“unconstitutional” and received vocal opposition from House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA). Though the House bill does grant tribal courts the authority to prosecute non-native perpetrators of domestic abuse, these abusers can only receive a maximum sentence of 1 year. The bill states, “A participating tribe may exercise this special domestic violence jurisdiction over only domestic or dating violence offenses punishable by up to one year committed in Indian country against a tribal member or non-tribal member Indian who resides in Indian country.” The House also adds a provision allowing the accused to take their case to federal court if they feel their rights are being violated. Currently, Native American victims with non-native partners are caught in a limbo where tribal courts cannot touch perpetrators but federal law enforcement does not have jurisdiction.
Since its inception in 1994, VAWA has been instrumental in driving down the number of partner homicides and establishing community programs to help women in abusive situations.
UPDATE
Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA), a chief advocate for VAWA in the Senate, blasted the House bill as a “non-starter” and called for moderate Republicans to take action: “It’s not a compromise, it’s an unfortunate effort to exclude specific groups of women from receiving basic protections under the law… The protections included in the Senate for new communities of women are not bargaining chips that can be played with in order to appease the far right in their party. These are badly needed new tools to give women an escape from a life stunted by abuse…It’s time for moderate Republicans in the House to step up and finally force their leadership to stop ignoring the calls of women across the country.”

Cantor calls for increasing federal employee retirement contributions 21FEB13

rep eric "kapo" cantor r VA continues the gop / tea-bagger assault on the federal workforce, an easy target in times of recession, tight budgets and sequestration. Those of us fortunate enough to have jobs are dealing with increased Social Security taxes as well as trying to find the money to save for retirement while still being able to survive on our stagnant incomes. Requiring federal workers to pay more for their retirement plans to make up for cuts of taxpayer subsidies to those plans is a reality most of us are facing. My employer doesn't offer any type of retirement plan, I have to contribute to my 401-K to have something to supplement my Social Security. Federal workers are employed by the taxpayers, and so are facing the same harsh economic realities from their employers the rest of us are facing. But at least the federal workforce works. They work a full work week, and we know, because the government hasn't come to a grinding halt, that the vast majority of them actually work. They deserve our respect, thanks and support. 
My question to "kapo" cantor is if his proposal also applies to members of congress? Senators and Representatives are also federal workers employed by the rest of us, and so should be subject to this proposal. For additional savings cantor should also propose elimination of the taxpayer subsidies of the health care plan for members of congress. He would also do well to institute a 5 day work week (for the House, where he can take that action) because while the gop / tea-baggers enjoy condemning the "lazy, over-payed, under-worked, bloated" federal workforce in their propaganda to the masses, the fact remains our country wouldn't be facing sequestration if congress actually worked.  

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) on Thursday repeated his call to replace sequestration with changes including revisions to the federal employee retirement program.
“Rather than take border patrol agents off the job, the President should instead choose to reform the federal employee retirement system so it matches what people get in the private sector,” Cantor said in a statement.
Cantor was referring to increasing the employee share toward their civil service annuity benefits, Rory Cooper, a spokesman for Cantor, said in an e-mail.
“Virtually no one has both a defined benefit and a defined contribution retirement system in the private sector,” Cooper said. “We wouldn’t eliminate it, but we would make the employer (taxpayer) subsidy less generous.”
Numerous proposals to increase employee contributions toward retirement — while lowering the government share by an equal amount — have circulated in recent years. President Obama recommended an increase 1.2 percentage points over three years in a fall 2011 proposal to the budgetary “supercommittee.” That special committee’s failure to reach an agreement left automatic budget cutting as the default way to achieve deficit reduction required by a law that raised the debt ceiling.
The White House included that recommendation in early 2012 in its fiscal 2013 budgetproposal. It estimated that the change would cost employees $21 billion over 10 years. Congress did not enact a 2013 budget. Instead, it generally extended spending at 2012 levels through a temporary measure set to expire next month, when a series of sharp automatic sharp cuts in spending on defense and other agencies and programs is set to go into effect.
The House last spring passed a bill designed to offset part of the sequester that included a 5 percentage point increase in employee contributions to be phased in over five years. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that increase – along with several more minor retirement-related provisions — as costing employees $79 billion over 10 years.
Cantor sponsored a sequester replacement bill that passed the House in December that included the same increase, among other provisions. The Senate did not take up either bill.
Said Cantor’s spokesman: “The President proposed reforming the federal pension system to the Joint Committee, it is in his budget and it was in our sequester replacement bill. Instead of raising taxes, this is the type of spending reform we should all be able to find agreement on, in order to avoid the negative effects of the sequester.”
Cantor’s statement also called for cutting waste and tightening government spending controls.
Many agencies, including Customs and Border Protection and the Pentagonhave said that if sequestration hits they would have to take numerous cost-saving steps, including putting employees on unpaid furloughs.
Nearly nine-tenths of federal employees are under the Federal Employees Retirement System, for which they pay the standard Social Security payroll tax of 6.2 percent of salary. Those first hired before this year pay an additional 0.8 percent of salary toward a civil service annuity; under a law enacted early in 2012, those first hired this year and after must pay an additional 2.3 percentage points.
Most other federal employees are under the Civil Service Retirement System, which requires a 7 percent of salary contribution for a civil service annuity that on average is worth nearly twice what a similarly situated FERS employee would receive. CSRS employees do not pay into Social Security, nor do they receive a benefit from that system for their federal employment years.
Federal employees are also eligible to save in the defined contribution Thrift Savings Plan, which operates much like a private-sector 401(k) program.

01 November 2012

President Obama, Gov. Chris Christie touring storm damage together in New Jersey & Don't let Republicans hold disaster relief hostage 31OKT&1NOV12

COVERAGE of Pres Obama's tour of storm ravaged New Jersey with Gov Christie, from the Washington Post. Also a petition campaign from Daily KOS demanding the repiglicans in Congress lead by lyin' paul ryan, eric cantor and john boehner not hold social safety net funding and funding for disaster relief for victims of Hurricane Sandy  be held hostage in budget negotiations, click the link to participate....
President Obama visited one of the hardest-hit areas in Hurricane Sandy’s destructive path Wednesday, joining New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R) — one of his most outspoken critics and a chief surrogate to rival Mitt Romney — for a tour of the damage the storm inflicted on the Garden State.

N.J. Gov. Chris Christie (R) and President Obama during the president’s visit to the Garden State to tour storm damage. (Jewel Samad/Getty Images)
“We are here for you. And we will not forget. We will follow up to make sure that you get all the help you need until you’ve rebuilt,” Obama said at an afternoon news conference.
Obama and Christie reviewed the storm’s impact on New Jersey from the air for a little over an hour before meeting with residents on the ground. Both stressed that restoring power to residents who have lost it is the top priority.
Speaking at a community center being used as a shelter, Obama praised Christie’s response to Sandy, and said the country’s been watching the Garden State in the wake of the storm.
“I want to let you know that your governor is working overtime,” the president said, later adding: ”The main message I wanted to send is the entire country has been watching what’s been happening. Everybody knows how hard Jersey’s been hit.”
Christie, who called Sandy “the worst storm that I’ve seen in my lifetime in the state,” lauded the president for making the trip to the Garden State.
“He has worked incredibly closely with me since before the storm hit. I think this is our sixth conversation since the weekend. It’s been a great working relationship,” Christie said.
Air Force One landed in Atlantic City just after 1 p.m. local time. On the tarmac, Christie greeted the president, who was accompanied by Federal Emergency Management Agency Administrator Craig Fugate. The three immediately boarded a helicopter to survey the storm’s damage and later met with locals impacted by Sandy.
From North Carolina to New England, Sandy’s high winds, storm surges, rain and snow have left thousands without power and claimed the lives of at least 59 people, according to the Associated Press.
Obama, who was previously scheduled to be on the campaign trail this week, canceled stops Monday and Tuesday to monitor the storm from Washington. He convened a video conference in the White House Situation Room with top advisers Tuesday morning and held a conference call with utility executives later in the day. The president met with top officials once again for a briefing Wednesday morning before he departed Washington. Obama’s trip to New Jersey was the only travel on his Wednesday schedule.
As he reviewed storm damage with Christie in Atlantic City, where Sandy made landfall Monday night, Obama joined a political opponent who hasn’t been shy about criticizing his administration. In recent days, though, Christie has appeared inclined to put politics aside in the wake of the deadly storm that slammed the East Coast. He applauded Obama’s response to New Jersey’s post-storm needs in a Tuesday morning interview.
“The federal government’s response has been great. I was on the phone at midnight again last night with the president, personally, he has expedited the designation of New Jersey as a major disaster area,” Christie said on NBC’s “Today” show. Obama ordered federal aid be sent to New Jersey, along with New York, West Virginia and Virginia, which were also impacted by Sandy.
While the president is visiting New Jersey in an official capacity, there also is a potential political upside to his trip. Six days before Election Day, it’s an opportunity for him to appear to be working in a bipartisan manner alongside one of his chief critics. It’s also a chance for Obama to remind voters of his commander-in-chief credentials.
For Christie, too, there is potential for political gain. The governor could face a tough reelection campaign in 2013. Appearing with Obama in the Democrat-leaning state could boost his own cross-party appeal ahead of what could be a bruising battle in 2013. What’s more, handling a natural disaster with command and control could win him praise from voters.
White House Press Secretary Jay Carney told reporters on Air Force One that Obama decided to visit New Jersey because of the impact of the storm on the Garden State, adding that this is no time for politics.
“New Jersey was, by many measures, the hardest-hit state — I believe that’s correct — and it is entirely appropriate for the president to visit New Jersey and receive updates on the efforts there to recover and to view firsthand the damage inflicted by Sandy.  This is not a time for politics,” Carney said.
When asked by a reporter Wednesday whether Christie’s praise of Obama annoyed him, senior Romney strategist Russ Schriefer — who was an adviser on Christie’s 2009 gubernatorial campaign — said Christie is simply doing what he was elected to do.
“Governor Christie is doing his job,” Schriefer said. “He is the governor of a state that has been hit by a very, very horrific storm, there’s tremendous damage, people have lost their lives and he’s doing exactly what he’s supposed to be doing as the governor of New Jersey. And the president is doing what he needs to do as president, and this is a case of the governor doing his job. So I think that’s it.”
Obama had halted his campaign activities through Wednesday, but will return to the stump Thursday. While he has remained focused on Sandy, Obama’s surrogates have been barnstorming the battleground states most likely to decide the outcome of the election. Former president Bill Clinton stumped for Obama in Iowa Wednesday morning and was slated to join a campaign event in Wisconsin later in the evening.
Romney, who canceled campaign rallies Tuesday to participate in storm relief efforts, was back on the campaign trail Wednesday for three stops in the key swing state of Florida. He was joined on the stump by Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), former Florida governor Jeb Bush (R) and Rep. Connie Mack (R-Fla.), who is also a U.S. Senate candidate.
On the Democratic side, Vice President Biden stumped for Obama in Florida on Wednesday.
A top Obama campaign adviser told reporters Wednesday that the president had been determined to monitor Sandy from Washington in advance of its impact and stay in close contact with the principals involved in the preparation and relief efforts.
“Our judgment was until we got a handle on the scope of this disaster, the president’s job, and this was his judgment, was to remain in Washington and in touch face-to-face with those who were responsible,” top Obama campaign adviser David Axelrod told reporters Wednesday morning.
Obama will campaign Thursday in Green Bay, Wis., Las Vegas and Boulder, Colo.
Philip Rucker contributed to this post.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2012/10/31/president-obama-gov-christie-to-tour-storm-damage-together-in-new-jersey/?wpisrc=nl_pmpolitics 

Craig, please sign our petition telling the House Republican leadership that federal emergency disaster funding should not be held hostage in order to force spending cuts elsewhere. Click here to sign.

In the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy, which affected as many as 60 million people, those in the path of the storm are relying on coordinated disaster relief to get back to normal. Yet Republican leadership, including Paul Ryan, Eric Cantor and John Boehner, have fought to cut disaster relief funding. In fact, they managed to cut the disaster relief fund to a mere $2.65 billion, which Sandy’s impact is sure to surpass.

Now, we have a huge swath of the eastern seaboard in need of relief, supplies and clean up. The resources to fund this effort will need to be allocated quickly, and it is likely that this will be done during the lame duck session. Those same House Republicans will still be in power and in the position to hold disaster relief hostage for other cuts. Given their past efforts, which include cutting first responder funding to pay for disaster relief, we must demand now that social programs and first responder funding are not cut to pay for Hurricane Sandy.

Please sign our petition telling House Republicans that federal disaster funding should not be held hostage in order to force spending cuts elsewhere.

Keep fighting,
Joan McCarter, Daily Kos

28 July 2012

REP ERIC CANTOR (R VA) DOESENT HAVE THE MORAL COURAGE TO DENOUNCE REP MICHELE BACHMAN 27JUL12 & After Bachmann Allegations, Clinton Deputy Reportedly Under Police Protection 23JUL12

HOUSE majority leader eric cantor r VA is a spineless, morally corrupt leader of the gop / tea-bagger delegation. Even john boehner r OH, Speaker of the House, and Sen john mccain r AZ have condemned the mccarthy style attacks of rep michele bachman r MN against Huma Abedin. Since these attacks Ms Abedin has been assigned police protection to prevent physical attacks by right-wing extremist. Please sign the petition to eric cantor telling him to step up and do the right thing and join the chorus of condemnation of michele bachman.


POLITICO: Eric Cantor defends Michele Bachmann
Sign the Petition: Denounce Bachmann and Cantor >>
Craig --

We all know Michele Bachmann is the queen of right-wing conspiracy theories.

Last week, she sent a letter to the State Department asking them to investigate Huma Abedin, one of Hillary Clinton’s top aides, for being associated with the Muslim Brotherhood.

Scores of pundits and politicians denounced Bachmann’s baseless accusations -- including Republicans John McCain and John Boehner. But this morning in a nationally televised interview on CBS, Eric Cantor refused to take on Bachmann.

Eric Cantor doesn’t have the courage to stand up to Bachmann or the right-wing fringe. Will you help us reach 100,000 strong denouncing Bachmann’s attacks?

Sign our petition right now to denounce Michele Bachmann’s bigoted attack on Muslim-Americans >>

Thanks for taking action.

Sal

Sal Abdulla
DCCC Membership Coordinatorner

After Bachmann Allegations, Clinton Deputy Reportedly Under Police Protection

| Mon Jul. 23, 2012 
huma abedinHuma Abedin.
In June, five Republican members of Congress, including Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.), sent letters to the nation's top law enforcement, defense, and intelligence agencies warning that the Muslim Brotherhood, an international Islamist organization, had infiltrated the United States government. Bachmann and her associates—Reps. Trent Franks (R-Ariz.), Louie Gohmert (R-Texas), Thomas Rooney (R-Fla.), and Lynn Westmoreland (R-Ga.)—demanded an investigation, and Bachmann told radio host Sandy Rios that "it appears that there are individuals who are associated with the Muslim Brotherhood who have positions, very sensitive positions, in our Department of Justice, our Department of Homeland Security, potentially even in the National Intelligence Agency."
There is not even a smidgen of credible evidence to back up the charges Bachmann and her colleagues have made. But one of the individuals Bachmann has singled for her supposed ties to the Muslim Brotherhood—Huma Abedin, a longtime aide to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton—has suffered very real consequences. Abedin, who's married ex-Rep. Anthony Weiner, with whom she has a new baby, has received threats in the wake of Bachmann's charges and is now under police protection, the New York Post reported Sunday. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) took to the Senate floor last week to defend Abedin, but that hasn't been enough to stop the witchhunt.
People for the American Way, a liberal advocacy group, has called on Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-Ohio), who called Bachmann's charges "pretty dangerous," to remove her from the House Intelligence committee as a way of sending a message that this kind of conduct is unacceptable.

02 December 2011

PATRIOTIC MILLIONAIRES FOR FISCAL STRENGTH

CLICK the header to check out these 1%ers who are calling on congress to raise their taxes. These are people who are millionaires who recognize the vast income gap is not healthy for the nation and who accept the responsibilities they have to the social contract with the nation. And be sure to read the PMFS debate with sen orrin hatch r UT about their call for raising taxes on the rich in America.....



You Should Know... Only 375,000 Americans have incomes of over $1,000,000
Between 1979 and 2007, incomes for the wealthiest 1% of Americans rose by 281%
During the Great Depression, millionaires had a top marginal tax rate of 68%
In 1963, millionaires had a top marginal tax rate of 91%
In 1976, millionaires had a top marginal tax rate of 70%
Today, millionaires have a top marginal tax rate of 35%
Reducing the income tax on top earners is one of the most inefficient ways to grow the economy according to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office
44% of Congress people are millionaires. The tax cuts were never meant to be permanent
Letting tax cuts for the top 2% expire as scheduled would pay down the debt by $700 billion over the next 10 years

Patriotic Millionaires Statement on the Super Committee and Taxes on Millionaires November 16, 2011
Thank you Democratic members of the Super Committee and Congress,
Thank you for making the tough decisions, for understanding that no deal was the best deal for America. Thank you for listening to the constituents you serve -- not just us millionaire members, but the 99%. While the majority of Americans are suffering, and making everyday sacrifices in these hard economic times, your Republican counterparts on the Super Committee and in Congress continue to ignore the realities of failed economic policies. They care more about their pledge to Norquist than their pledge to the United States Constitution. Thank you for being patriotic in a time when the American people need you most.
Thank you,
Patriotic Millionaires and Patriotic Americans

We are writing to ask you to do the right thing for our country and REJECT ANY Super Committee deal that does not raise tax rates on incomes over $1 million to AT LEAST 39.6%, REGARDLESS of how many deductions are eliminated.

Private jets shouldn’t have been tax deductible in the first place.
Thank you,
Patriotic Millionaires and Patriotic Americans
Read Our Original Letter
Dear Mr President
We are writing to urge you to put our country ahead of politics.
For the fiscal health of our nation and the well-being of our fellow citizens, we ask that you increase taxes on incomes over $1,000,000.
We make this request as loyal citizens who now or in the past earned an income of $1,000,000 per year or more.
Our country faces a choice – we can pay our debts and build for the future, or we can shirk our financial responsibilities and cripple our nation’s potential.
Our country has been good to us. It provided a foundation through which we could succeed. Now, we want to do our part to keep that foundation strong so that others can succeed as we have.
Please do the right thing for our country. Raise our taxes.
Thank you,
hatch
On April 14th, Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) commented that: "We hear this quite a bit from rich Democrats. 'Please tax us more,' they say. Well I know a lot who don't say that I'll tell you that. As the ranking member on the Senate Finance Committee I feel obligated to inform Mr. Plouffe that the president and all those rich, liberal democrats who are eager to pay higher taxes can do just that. They can write a check to the IRS and make an extra payment on their tax return to pay down the federal debt. The option is right there at the bottom of their tax return."
In response, the Patriotic Millionaires released a statement to the press saying: "A few of us voluntarily writing a check to the IRS will not fix the problem that Sen. Hatch and his colleagues created for our country with their fiscal irresponsibility. It will take the work of all Patriotic Americans to create a strong foundation for our continued prosperity. We are willing to do our part by paying higher taxes. It is clear Senator Hatch and many of his colleagues are not willing to do theirs. We challenge Senator Hatch and the other millionaire members of the Senate to put their country first and raise taxes on people like them – and us – who make more than a million dollars a year. In the meantime, if Senator Hatch would like to make a personal contribution to the IRS to help his country, we pledge to match his contribution."
The following week, the Millionaires received a letter from Sen. Hatch detailing the reasoning behind his statement. Click here to read his letter.
The Millionaires responded in kind. You can read their letter here.

31 August 2011

Costs Of Irene Add Up As FEMA Runs Out Of Cash 30AUG11

THE loss of life from Irene is tragic. The damage from Irene is also tragic, and the aftermath is going to get worse because of the lack of funding for FEMA. But to put this disaster in perspective, look at the map below showing the 2010 House districts by party red for repiglican and blue for Democrats. Then consider the areas hardest hit by Irene, those areas facing massive cleanup and rebuilding expenses. Most are represented by repiglicans, elected by people who were stupid enough to buy into the dangers of big government propaganda spewed by the repiglicans and tea-baggers. FEMA is out of money and the repiglican leadership isn't going to allow any more funding without budget cuts from other programs the states depend on. This from House majority leader eric cantor r VA 
"Cantor: Hurricane Disaster Relief Will Have To Be Offset With Program Cuts
 By Brian Beutler, Talking Points Memo - August 29, 2011,

As expected, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) will try to see to it that federal disaster aid to regions damaged by Hurricane Irene be offset by concomitant cuts to other federal programs."
SO these people are getting the government they voted for. If the only way the repiglicans will provide more funding for FEMA let them do it by cutting funding for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Speed up the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq, and stop all deployments to Afghanistan and bring those troops home to stay as their deployments end. Cut tax subsidies for all companies that lay-off people here and outsource jobs overseas. Unfortunately that is not where the money will come from because the corporate welfare queens and the military-industrial complex have control of Congress. The funding will come from cuts in education, social safety net programs, the EPA, the Dept of Agriculture, Health and Human Services, the Dept of Labor and others. Maybe, just maybe, while communities and wallowing in despair and  destruction and roads and bridges aren't repaired and rebuilt, while water remains unsafe and power supplies remain disrupted, while more people remain unemployed because their businesses are closed due to damage or lack of infrastructure, while Congress squabbles about FEMA funding, just maybe these people will think about the representatives they sent to the House and how it might not have been the smartest vote they ever cast.  
Jarrid Gonyea and his wife, Michelle, check out damage caused by Tropical Storm Irene on Hurricane Road in Keene, N.Y., on Monday. The costs of the storm that stretched across the Eastern Seaboard are estimated to be in the billions.
Hans Pennink/AP Jarrid Gonyea and his wife, Michelle, check out damage caused by Tropical Storm Irene on Hurricane Road in Keene, N.Y., on Monday. The costs of the storm that stretched across the Eastern Seaboard are estimated to be in the billions.
text size A A A
August 30, 2011
From washed-away roads in North Carolina to historic bridges flooded out in Vermont, Hurricane Irene took its toll up and down the Eastern Seaboard.
But the East is not the only region to suffer from natural disasters this year. There was a string of deadly tornadoes in the South this spring, floods along the Mississippi and in the Upper Midwest, and last May's devastating tornado in Joplin, Mo.
In instances like this, yes, there is a federal role. Yes, we're going to find the money. We're just going to need to make sure that there are savings elsewhere to continue to do so.
So FEMA administrator Craig Fugate says his agency will postpone work on some of the repair and restoration projects resulting from the earlier storms to pay for the immediate needs resulting from Irene.
Fugate, speaking to reporters in the White House briefing room Monday, said his decision has already been misinterpreted: "A lot of people thought, well, the people that have been impacted by the tornadoes and floods — we're going to take that money away from them."
But Fugate stressed that is not the case.
"The survivors that are eligible for assistance are still getting funds. Individual assistance programs were not affected by this, nor was any protective measures, or any debris clearance, or any project that had already been approved," he said.
In places like Joplin, Fugate said, the only projects that will be suspended are those still in the planning stages. Both of Missouri's senators are urging the White House to make sure FEMA funds continue to flow into their state.
A New Confrontation Looms
FEMA's role in a disaster is multilayered. It provides immediate assistance, helping victims pay for shelter and food and medical needs. Later on, it pays to rebuild schools, bridges and water treatment plants.
For instance, FEMA is still paying for rebuilding related to Hurricane Katrina, which struck six years ago this week.
FEMA Administrator Craig Fugate, shown at a press briefing last week in Washington, says his agency will postpone some repair work on earlier disasters in order to pay for the immediate needs of Irene.
Enlarge Paul J. Richards /AFP/Getty Images FEMA Administrator Craig Fugate, shown at a press briefing last week in Washington, says his agency will postpone some repair work on earlier disasters in order to pay for the immediate needs of Irene.
Dan Kaniewski, who worked at FEMA during the George W. Bush administration and now teaches at George Washington University, says Fugate is making the right decision.
"He's got to deal with the cards he's been dealt," says Kaniewski. "He has a limited amount of money, and he realizes, rightly so, that money has to be allocated for the most pressing needs. And right now, it's those individuals who have been impacted by Hurricane Irene — they need to be provided the assistance to make sure they have a roof over their heads."
All told, there have been 10 storms that cost at least a billion dollars each this year, if you include Irene's expected costs. And FEMA says its disaster relief fund is below the billion dollars it likes to keep on hand.
So the administration will be forced to go to Congress for more aid, setting up a potential fight with House Republicans. In the past, emergency aid funds have been treated as, well, emergencies, and the money spent was added to the deficit. No more, says House Majority Leader Eric Cantor.
Speaking on Fox on Monday, Cantor said the money to pay for disaster aid will have to be offset with cuts elsewhere in the budget.
"In instances like this, yes, there is a federal role. Yes, we're going to find the money. We're just going to need to make sure that there are savings elsewhere to continue to do so," Cantor said.
In fact, the House has already approved a measure to put an additional $1 billion in the disaster relief fund for this year, and some $2.65 billion for next year.
The Senate has yet to act, but the top Democrats on the Appropriations Committee vow to take up a FEMA funding measure as soon as lawmakers return to the Capitol next week. The Senate bill, however, is unlikely to contain the offsets demanded by House Republicans.
That's likely to mean yet another confrontation between the two parties and the two chambers of Congress.

Related NPR Stories

 

More From This Series

Podcast + RSS Feeds

Podcast RSS

  • U.S.
     
  • Hurricane Irene Hits East Coast