NORTON META TAG

Showing posts with label islamophobia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label islamophobia. Show all posts

05 June 2026

Far-Right Leaders, Including Ex-CBP Chief Greg Bovino, Convene in Portugal for “Remigration Summit” & Why did the press ignore a gathering of the world's leading fascists? 4JUN&31MAI26

 



AMERICA has been fighting the scourge of fascism and "christian" nationalism since neo nazi fascist barry goldwater was the gop / guardians of prejudice-republican party presidential candidate in 1964. So called moderate republicans kept the right wing extremist under control, loosening their hold gradually until NOT MY pres drumpf/trump lead a coup of party, declaring an agenda based on voluntary ignorance, hate, racism, bigotry, greed, fearmongering, misogyny, and apostasy of Christianity. Sadly it seems too many Europeans have forgotten the death and destruction extreme right wing politics brought to the world in the 20th century, hence this summit in Portugal. From DemocracyNow! and The Redoubt 

Far-Right Leaders, Including Ex-CBP Chief Greg Bovino, Convene in Portugal for “Remigration Summit”


StoryJune 04, 2026
Guests
  • Charles R. Davis
    journalist.
  • Hundreds of far-right activists gathered in Portugal on Saturday for the annual “Remigration Summit” advocating for the mass deportation of immigrants. Former U.S. Border Patrol Commander Gregory Bovino and white nationalist leader Jared Taylor were VIP guests alongside elected officials from Germany and Spain’s far-right parties. In an interview ahead of the event, Bovino cited Nazi Germany’s lead general, Erwin Rommel, as an inspirational figure.

“Remigration is basically the policy response to the 'great replacement' conspiracy theory,” says Charles R. Davis, a journalist based in Vienna, Austria. Davis explains “great replacement” as a theory that there is a “global elite plot, typically by Jews,” to replace white people in Europe and North America with immigrants. “It’s an argument for mass deportations,” not just of recently arrived immigrants, but of “those who were allowed in over the last hundred years who were not really, as they see it, European or American,” says Davis. “This is basically rooted in Nazi ideology.”

Transcript
This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.

AMY GOODMAN: This is Democracy Now!, democracynow.org, The War and Peace Report. I’m Amy Goodman, with Nermeen Shaikh.

NERMEEN SHAIKH: In Portugal, hundreds of far-right activists gathered Saturday for the annual “Remigration Summit” advocating for the mass deportation of immigrants. Former U.S. Border Patrol Commander Gregory Bovino and white nationalist leader Jared Taylor were VIP guests alongside elected officials from Germany’s far-right, anti-immigrant AfD party and Spain’s Vox. Other attendees included Stefano Forte, president of the New York Young Republican Club.

In an interview ahead of the event, Greg Bovino cited Nazi Germany’s lead general, Erwin Rommel, as an inspirational figure. At the summit, Bovino said, quote, “If there is inspiration gained from the U.S. Border Patrol model and method, then fantastic.”

AMY GOODMAN: Gregory Bovino led the Trump administration’s militarized immigration crackdowns in Chicago, Los Angeles and Minneapolis. Earlier this year, he appeared in Minneapolis wearing a long olive wool overcoat that some online observers likened to, quote, “a Nazi cosplay coat.” California Governor Gavin Newsom’s social media press account called it “Nazi-coded.”

Bovino was eventually removed from his position in January after immigration agents under his command killed 37-year-old VA nurse Alex Pretti in Minneapolis. Pretti was shot dead two weeks after an ICE agent fatally shot Renee Good in Minneapolis.

During an interview outside the so-called Remigration Summit in Portugal, Bovino criticized the Trump administration.

GREGORY BOVINO: The base is not very happy now over what’s happening immigration-wise. They voted for mass deportations. Mass deportations are not occurring. There are no mass deportations occurring in the United States right now. So, those MAGA voters, those 80 million that came out to vote for him in the polls, are not happy campers right now.

AMY GOODMAN: We go now to Vienna, Austria, to speak with the reporter Charles Davis, who writes for The Guardian and also runs The Redoubt, where his new piece is headlined “Why did the press ignore a gathering of the world’s leading fascists?”

Charles, thanks so much for being with us. Why don’t you talk about what remigration is and the significance of Bovino being there?

CHARLES R. DAVIS: Yeah, so, remigration is basically the policy response to the “great replacement” conspiracy theory. And the great replacement conspiracy theory, as I think, unfortunately, a lot of your viewers will already know about, is the idea that there’s like a global elite plot, typically by Jews, to replace white Europeans and white North Americans with immigrants via mass migration. So, “remigration” was a term that was popularized a few years ago by an Austrian activist named Martin Sellner. He’s also the guy who helped popularize the great replacement conspiracy theory.

And it basically is — it’s an argument for mass deportations not just of illegal criminals, as is the typical rhetoric you would hear from the Trump administration and far-right parties here in Europe, but it’s the idea that we need to actually, like, reverse the 20th century, that the issue is not just the immigrants who came in the last few years seeking asylum or refugee status, but those who were allowed in over the last hundred years who were not really, as they see it, European or American.

NERMEEN SHAIKH: And, Charles, could you explain why — you mentioned earlier — why is this remigration idea attributed to Jews, this global plot?

CHARLES R. DAVIS: Well, actually, yeah, my original piece that I wrote last week, I spoke to a professor at the University of Vienna named Daniel Sharp, who explained that this is basically rooted in Nazi ideology. Like, the idea — specifically, let’s talk about Germany and Austria. The idea that certain people were not German and Austrian, despite the fact that they had lived in this area for hundreds of years, despite the fact that they had citizenship, that was very much the Nazi idea. And in fact, remigration back then, before it became the Holocaust, was the idea that we would expel Jews to places like Madagascar.

So, when it’s — when it’s popularized now, like, I mean, this is why it caused such a controversy a few years ago when Martin Sellner was meeting with members of Alternative für Deutschland. In 2023, the German outlet Correctiv reported that there was a secret meeting in Potsdam between Sellner and leaders of the AfD. And that caused national protests, because Germans know their history, right? They know what happens when you start saying certain Germans are more Germans than others.

And I think what is so alarming about this summit is that these people, including the AfD lawmakers that attended this, AfD lawmaker Lena Kotré and the AfD press that showed up to give her a platform, they’re now doing it out in the open. And I think that is maybe one of the lessons they’ve learned from Donald Trump. They’ve been both emboldened and empowered by him, and they’ve also learned that the way you get away with this kind of stuff and get away with this kind of crazy, conspiratorial and, you know, policy of ethnic cleansing, which I think you can call remigration — the way you get away with it is not by having secret meetings that the press can then expose. You just do it out in public, and you say, “There’s no — there’s nothing scandalous here. We’re doing this out in public. We’re organizing on Facebook.” In fact, that’s where I first learned about this summit, paid Facebook ads by the group Reconquista, which is a far-right Portuguese group, which is named after the idea of mass expulsions of Muslims historically from the Iberian Peninsula. And so, now it’s all out in the open.

And if we can be grateful to Greg Bovino for anything, it’s to drawing some attention to this, and also spelling out what they mean by remigration. It is not just deporting so-called illegals. Greg Bovino, when he was criticizing the Trump administration, you know, I’m less interested in his sour grapes, and more in the fact that he spelled out that he thinks there are 100 million “illegal aliens” in the United States. Now, most credible experts would tell you there are 12 million tops. But if you were paying attention during the 2024 campaign, you might have seen Donald Trump and JD Vance making that number go a little bit higher every time they spoke. It hit 20 million, it hit 30 million, and now it hit 100 million. And I think that speaks to the fact that they’re not just trying to get people out based on pure legal status. You have to view it in the context of trying to eliminate birthright citizenship and rolling back the 20th century. It’s getting rid of people that came over the last hundred years who they define as not American or not European enough, in the European context.

NERMEEN SHAIKH: And so, if you could say a little bit more about the way in which Trump and his administration generally have been advancing and elevating this idea, and in particular the fact that the State Department has pledged to create an office for remigration? What is the status of that? Has it been established? And what is its purpose?

CHARLES R. DAVIS: Well, you know, the Trump administration, there’s always a little bit of dance that the far right does. There are those that are like the public figures that say, “You know, remigration, don’t get too scared about it. We actually just mean deporting criminals.” That is what the AfD did after their secret meeting with Martin Sellner was exposed a few years ago. If you go to their website, they say, “We just mean getting rid of, like, the people that have committed violent crimes, etc.” And same with the Trump administration.

I do not know if they actually succeeded in establishing this, but the whole department of remigration that they were going to establish from under the State Department was ostensibly about voluntary self-deportation. Of course, when you get them to speak honestly at summits like just happened over the weekend, you see that it’s not just about getting out a certain amount of “illegal aliens,” as they call them, or getting people to self-deport. I mean, they would get people to self-deport by creating such a hostile environment and, I think, through state force to get them expelled.

And in terms of remigration in Europe, the United States State Department has actually endorsed this great replacement conspiracy theory. In the U.S. National Security Strategy document that was released last December, the Trump administration warned that majority non-Europeans were taking over Europe and that Europeans faced a stark prospect of civilizational erasure, and that, should present trends continue, the continent will be unrecognizable in 20 years or less. Now, living here in Vienna, I can tell you that that is not really taking place. You know, there are definitely more immigrants here than there were 20 years ago, but the idea that they’re facing civilizational erasure for white Austrians, that is — it’s conspiratorial.

And I think what upsets me so much about the coverage of this and just the far-right extremism, in general, is that if you — you sound kind of crazy when you talk about it. When you say that the face of Donald Trump’s deportation policy and a young Republican leader, Stefano Forte, are going to Europe to meet with self-described fans of Adolf Hitler, people that you can fairly describe as neo-Nazi activists, to talk about a plan for ethnic cleansing, it sounds crazy, because, you know, we should acknowledge that there has been some reporting on this — it’s not just people like myself — but you have not seen any coverage from CBS News, you’ve not seen any coverage from The Washington Post, and you’ve not seen any coverage from The New York Times. And I think that is a huge problem, because The New York Times, especially, is an institution that could make this something more than just a one-day story, that could press the Trump administration to answer: When did they realize that Greg Bovino was a Nazi sympathizer? — and to press Republicans in New York and elsewhere: Do you agree with Stefano Forte in his efforts to forge a kind of neofascist transatlantic alliance?

AMY GOODMAN: So, I wanted to ask you more about Bovino and why people should care, since he has been ousted. You have him tweeting from Newark — many people wondered if he had gone to Delaney — but on his way to Portugal, “Sen. Mullin” — he was talking about the new DHS secretary — “and the rest of them have been trying to handle these riots and… well, let’s just say it’s not going great. For those of you in the comments section, give a vote. Should I just handle this myself? Those agents’ lives are at stake due to this inaction.” And then you have — let me go to Greg Bovino speaking to Newsmax about the hunger strike at the Delaney Hall ICE jail in Newark.

GREGORY BOVINO: As far as the facilities, those facilities are actually — I think they’re too good, fantastic facilities. Those detainees get everything they need. But what they really need is deporting. And we need to expand this facility so we can get even more detainees in there. Carl, hey, I’ve heard about a hunger strike, which, you know, I think that’s fake news anyway. But if they did, well, I’m OK with that, because if they lose weight, we can get even more people on planes for deportation.

AMY GOODMAN: So, that was Bovino talking to Newsmax. And, of course, you had Tom Homan, the so-called border czar, denying there’s a hunger strike, but then saying he would force-feed prisoners there. And then you have Bovino saying, “You have the world watching and supporting your efforts to hold the line,” he’s saying to ICE agents at Delaney. “Every one of us wants to be shoulder to shoulder with you. In speaking with the Mean Green Team, they send you support and are wishing you the best.” He also talked about ”ICE Agents at Delaney, hang in there.” This is extremely interesting, given he is both supporting them and criticizing the Trump administration. Your final comment on this, the role he plays?

CHARLES R. DAVIS: Well, yeah, I think he does speak for the MAGA base. And I think it’s interesting that when he criticizes the Trump administration, he is criticizing the czars around him. It’s always the bad advisers. He’s not criticizing Stephen Miller or Donald Trump. And I think he’s right not to, because I think Stephen Miller and Donald Trump share the remigration agenda that he has.

And I think it’s interesting, since we’re talking about him showing up to Newark, or at least faking that he would. You know, for several days, organizers of this summit had been teasing that they would have a special guest star. And in the weeks leading up to it, I kind of wondered who that was. I thought, “Is it going to be a former Fox News anchor? Is it going to be Nick Fuentes?” And then Greg Bovino posted on X a photo of himself with — giving what can only be described as a Nazi salute. And I think at that exact moment I realized it is him. It is him. And I checked the Telegram channel for the summit, and they had just announced him.

And I think that is what is alarming, because I think he does speak, in an unfiltered way, what Stephen Miller and Donald Trump would like to say, but they are prevented to by their — the Susie Wiles, who know, again, this kind of fascist dance, that you cannot come out and say this. You can hint at it by embracing the term “remigration,” but when the broader public asks you what that means, you tell them it’s not the scary thing that it totally does mean, and which you are signaling to your far-right supporters that you yourself support.

The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.

Martin Sellner (l), Greg Bovino (c) and Afonso Gonçalves (r) at "Remigration Summit 2026." Photo published May 30, 2026.

Just before he confirmed his attendance at a neo-fascist summit in Portugal, Gregory Bovino, the former U.S. Border Patrol commander who was once the face of President Donald Trump's mass deportations, posted a photo on X showing himself giving a salute familiar to anyone who has heard of Nazi Germany.


It would be easier to dismiss this Hitlerian greeting as an awkward gesture — as some did when X's owner, Elon Musk, gave it at Trump's 2025 inauguration — were it not selected and shared by a man on his way to a racial-purity conference. The "Remigration Summit 2026," so called, was held May 30 at the Salmanha Residence hotel just south of Porto, Portugal, and its organizers were not subtle.

"Weimar conditions require Weimar solutions," argues Afonso Gonçalves, chief organizer of the event. He's the founder of the far-right group Reconquista, so named for the mass expulsion of Muslims from the Iberian Peninsula. That's who Bovino was photographed standing next to after he landed in Europe.

Martin Sellner, an extremist from Austria, is best known for pushing the "great replacement" conspiracy theory — that Jewish elites are seeking to exterminate the white race via mass migration — that has motivated mass shooters from Pennsylvania to New Zealand. He was the other man standing next to Bovino.

Other speakers included a Belgian fascist convicted of Holocaust denial and the founder of a Swiss neo-Nazi group called "Junge Tat" who is quite open about his fondness for "National Socialism."

I first learned of this gathering on Facebook, where it was promoted by Reconquista with paid advertising (Meta refused to comment or to take down the ads). The only secret was its precise location.

And yet? No media outlet in the English-speaking world covered the fact that a former Trump administration official was at a gathering of the world's leading fascists to promote "remigration," a far-right euphemism for the ethnic cleansing of non-white people from the United States and Europe.

Major media outlets also ignored the presence of Stefano Forte, president of the New York Young Republican Club. A spokesperson for the group — informed of the extremist views (and criminal convictions) of those attending — told The Redoubt that it would "never apologize for standing alongside our European brothers and sisters."

One of the only outlets that covered this event — and certainly the first — was The Redoubt. The Spanish newspaper El Pais reported on the presence of Rocio de Meer Méndez, a politician with the far-right Vox party; Europe's Politico covered it too. But otherwise? As of Sunday afternoon, coverage appeared largely limited to the far-right outlets that were invited, such as the AfD-affiliated Deutschland Kurier (Alternative für Deutschland lawmaker Lena Kotré was another featured speaker).

The mainstream right is crawling into the sewer of neo-Nazi ideology but you probably wouldn't know it unless you were a right-wing extremist yourself. Even news outlets that dedicate significant resources to covering the scourge of antisemitism generally ignore it, at least in the United States, when it comes from Republican operatives and retired Trump administration officials.

There is no need to argue about whether there is a double standard; the lack of media coverage speaks for itself. The only question is why it exists.

Right-wing capture of the corporate media in the United States is one response; there's just no incentive to highlight one side of the aisle's extremists.

Bari Weiss, an opinion columnist with no record of actual reporting, was handed full control over CBS News based on her willingness to turn it into a mouthpiece for its new owners' politics. ABC paid Donald Trump millions of dollars for the crime of accurately describing his civil liability for sexual assault. Jeff Bezos has turned The Washington Post into a conservative blog, and not a particularly interesting one.

These outlets will cover extremism and antisemitism if the dots can be connected to an elected Democrat, no question, but not when it's the other way around. After all, it is in the interests of their ownership, and the reactionary cause, for right-wing politics to be seen as a necessarily brutish response to the dangers of a loony left.

But I think it's more than that. I think it's that we, broadly speaking, demand nothing from the right, even if we don't share the politics. When illiberal figures behave badly, as they are wont to do — when they give voice to their basest and oft-libidinal desires and hatreds — it is viewed as akin to a mangy dog chewing on a slipper. They are not defying expectations; they can't really be helped.

Whether from sympathy or condescension, far-right politics are interpreted as naturally occurring in a way that left-wing politics are not. Small-minded, reactionary tribalism is the default setting of the world, or so it is thought. It's only news, and only interesting, when someone who purports to be better shows that they're not.

Eventually, though, what's left of the free press will have to reckon with the fact that the far-right fringe is now the modern world's governing elite — and openly declaring an intent to repeat the 1930s. That's a story.



Screen capture of Google News taken May 31, 2026.


10 June 2017

'March Against Sharia' Planned Across The U.S. ARE THEY AGAINST ISLAMIC SHARIA OR CHRISTIAN SHARIA?10JUN17

Related imageImage result for american fascism meme
THIS is America and people have the right to express their opinions non-violently. THERE is absolutely no justification for the radical left to disrupt these marches with confrontation and violence. People on the left who claim to love our Republic and the civil liberties guaranteed by the American constitution and oppose the message of these marches should stay away from them, there should not be any attempt to stop them. We can not lower ourselves to the levels of the organizers of these marches, if we do then we become as hypocritical as the march organizers and participants.  It is galling these marches are being portrayed as being in defense of women. These same people voted for and support the candidates, now (NOT MY) president and (NOT MY) vice-president who feel it is OK to approach a woman and 'grab her by her pussy' and to 'just go up to a woman and start kissing her'. These same people who are against islamic sharia support the christian sharia the American political right is trying to impose on us. "ACT for America organizers say an adherence to Sharia among Muslims leads to abuses against women, from discrimination to honor killings." Discrimination against women? How about making equal pay the law so women are paid the same as men for doing the same work. Discrimination against women? How about stopping legislation that limits women making their own decisions about reproduction while not legislating limits on men's access to ED medication? Abuses and discrimination against women (and their families) includes cuts to social safety net programs that would allow women to feed, house, educate and obtain the healthcare they and their children need. Abuses against women? Why isn't the Violence Against Women Act permanent law, why does it have to be reauthorized? This map shows where the republicans who voted against reauthorizing the VAWA are from, areas of the country where women are being legislated back into the 1920's. 

House vote on Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013
  Democratic aye
  Republican aye
  Abstention or no representative seated
  Republican no
So don't try to deceive us into believing these marches are in defense of women because they are not. These marches are supporting and promoting racism, bigotry, hate, xenophobia, fascism.

'March Against Sharia' Planned Across The U.S.

Saturday's nationwide "March Against Sharia," sponsored by a group known for aggressively criticizing Islam, has in recent days become a rallying cause for right-wing extremists, forcing march organizers to repudiate some of their own supporters and prompting concern about clashes with militant leftists.
The marches, due to be held in at least 19 states, are being coordinated by ACT for America, a conservative grass-roots organization that calls itself "the NRA of national security." The group has a long history of opposing Sharia, which is a legal or philosophical code derived from Islamic scripture and meant to guide the behavior of observant Muslims.
ACT for America organizers say an adherence to Sharia among Muslims leads to abuses against women, from discrimination to honor killings.
The national coordinator of the marches, Scott Presler, is a 29-year-old Republican operative who says he, as a gay man, was first motivated to fight Muslim extremism after the deadly Orlando, Fla., shooting last June.
The target in Orlando was a gay nightclub, and the perpetrator allegedly pledged loyalty to ISIS. To Presler, it highlighted a problem of anti-gay bigotry in orthodox Islam.


"This was born on the Internet, from me sending out a Twitter post saying, 'Hey, I would love to do a rally, who wants to help?' " Presler told NPR. The query, he said, prompted responses from conservative activists across the country. "My email has just been pummeled with activity."
Among those who answered Presler's call is Denise Zamora. She offered to organize a march in San Bernardino, Calif., at the site of the 2015 mass shooting carried out by a Pakistani-American and his wife.
"I wasn't even familiar with anything about Sharia law," she told NPR. "I didn't know much about radical Muslims or jihad. I wasn't educated. So I started learning about everything, and when ACT for America announced they were going to do a nationwide march, I quickly volunteered."
Zamora, whose political activism began with her involvement in the Trump presidential campaign, says the San Bernardino rally, like others across the country, will highlight the problem of female genital mutilation. The practice is common in some conservative Muslim societies, but many Islamic scholars insist it is not mandated under Sharia.
Presler hopes the marches will attract broad participation. "These are things that all women should support," he said.
The movement, however, appears to be in danger of veering in an extremist direction. ACT for America has a militant attitude toward Islam, and comments on Facebook suggest the marches are attracting many far-right sympathizers, including several who decorate their posts with Confederate flags.
In Arkansas, a march was organized by Billy Roper, an avowed white supremacist.
"We want to send a message to Muslims that they are not welcome in our communities," Roper said in a podcast on Wednesday. "We want to send a message to Muslims that they're not welcome in our state. And ultimately we want to send a message to Muslims that they're not welcome in our nation and, of course, endgame, on our planet."
Roper specifically encouraged "white nationalists" to attend the marches and noted they could bring weapons to those rallies where "open carry" gun laws are in effect.
Such extremism has alarmed the ACT for America leadership. After his podcast, the group severed ties with Roper and put out a statement that the Arkansas march was canceled "when we became aware that the organizer is associated with white supremacist groups. This is against all of our values."
Roper's wife, however, posted screenshots of prior emails between Presler and Roper, including one showing Presler telling Roper, "You are approved and ready to go." Asked about that communication, Presler said only that the Arkansas march was canceled "as soon as the information revealed itself."
Militant "anti-fascist" or "antifa" groups, however, have promised to show up at anti-Sharia rallies to confront the marchers, and right-wing paramilitary groups such as the Three Percenters, Proud Boys and Oath Keepers were arranging to provide security at the rallies, setting the stage for violent confrontations.
Those organizations have previously clashed with "antifa" groups in Berkeley, Calif., and Portland, Ore., though Oath Keepers President Stewart Rhodes told NPR that his members only engage the counterprotesters when the police fail to keep the two sides separated.
"Where the police stand up, we'll stand down," Rhodes said. "But where they stand down, we have to stand up."
Rhodes declined to say which marches will be secured by Oath Keeper volunteers, many of whom have law enforcement or military backgrounds, though they are expected at several locations. "We're encouraging our members to go to each and every one of them," Rhodes said.
The Oath Keepers website says members promise to support the U.S. Constitution "against all enemies, foreign and domestic" and pledge to disobey any order they consider unconstitutional.
The prospect of violent confrontations at the anti-Sharia marches have local law enforcement authorities on edge. In San Bernardino, an "antifa" group has posted signs at the site of the march, urging activists to confront the marchers. A police spokesman says the department will be monitoring both sides for any signs of trouble.
Michael Radcliffe contributed to this story.

12 May 2017

Pence's Perch Atop Trump's Voter Fraud Commission Hints at Suppression Efforts 12MAI17

Related image
UNDERSTAND this, (NOT MY) vp mike pence is an active participant in the corrupt drumpf/trump administration. Many think he is the voice of sanity, the cool, calm politician in the White House, the voice of reason, someone those opposed to (NOT MY) pres drumpf/trump can work with. Some even think that once drumpf/trump is impeached or resigns and pence takes over there will be an administration in the White House that will lead with respect for the US Congress and US Judiciary and in the best interest of our Republic. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Need proof? Consider the fact pence remained drumpf's/trump's vp after the "grab "em by the pussy" scandal, he did not object to the firing of Sally Yates or the hiring of michael flynn and is standing by drumpf's/trump's firing of james comey. He is totally involved in the propaganda campaign to deceive the American people about Russian involvement in the 2016 Presidential election. pence may be more dangerous for the American Republic because he is an establishment politician, a master of political lying, deception and manipulation, because of these skills he seems to be remaining above the fray. He is in fact involved in, supporting and defending the corruption of the drumpf/trump presidency, doing his part to impose authoritarian rule and "christian sharia" on the American people. From +Mother Jones .....

Pence's Perch Atop Trump's Voter Fraud Commission Hints at Suppression Efforts

As Indiana governor, Pence cheered a crackdown on a major voter registration drive.

After claiming that as many as 5 million people voted illegally in the November election, President Donald Trump signed an executive order Thursday to create a commission to address voter fraud. With widespread evidence that voter fraud is nearly nonexistent, voting rights groups have seen similar efforts as a pretense to suppress voting among young voters and minorities.
The announcement of the commission's leadership team reinforced civil rights groups' concerns that the panel's work will be used to justify voter suppression techniques such as voter ID laws and registration purges. The commission's chair will be Vice President Mike Pence. Last year, as governor of Indiana, Pence cheered the actions of state police and the secretary of state's office as they shut down a voter major registration drive under the guise of protecting the integrity of the voting process.
Trump's order instructs the new Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity to study "vulnerabilities in voting systems and practices used for Federal elections that could lead to improper voter registrations and improper voting, including fraudulent voter registrations and fraudulent voting." Election law experts and civil rights groups quickly condemned the record of the commission's vice chair, Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, who has helped craft anti-immigrant laws, the post-9/11 "Muslim registry," and voter suppression efforts in his state.
But the track records of Pence and another former Indiana official on the commission also hint at voter suppression—particularly since the state's crackdown hinged on one of the targets outlined in Trump's order: inconsistencies apparently caused in part by outdated voter registration rolls.
In April 2016, a group called the Indiana Voter Registration Project began a registration drive in the Hoosier State, focusing on underrepresented African American communities. By the summer, the group had about 100 canvassers in the state and was registering thousands of people. Under Indiana law, canvassers are required to turn in every voter registration form they receive to the county—they can't withhold the forms of people who might not vote the way they want—and to sign each form and flag suspicious ones. Bill Buck, a spokesman for the Indiana Voter Registration Project, says canvassers were following all of these rules.
But by late summer, state officials had begun to investigate the group. On September 15, Indiana's secretary of state, Republican Connie Lawson, warned local election officials about the group's voter registration efforts. "Nefarious actors are operating here in Indiana," she wrote. "A group by the name of the Indiana Voter Registration Project has forged voter registrations." The state police opened an investigation, and canvassers reported that police were interrogating them in their homes.
On October 4, state police raided the group's Marion County headquarters, seizing phones, computers, and papers. The raid halted the group's registration efforts a week before the state's registration deadline, preventing the group from registering an additional 5,000 to 10,000 people, according to Buck. The investigation eventually expanded to 56 counties in Indiana. In mid-October, a spokesman for the state police described vague evidence that the group had been forging registration forms: "The possible fraudulent or false information is a combination of made up names and made up addresses, real names with made up or incorrect addresses and false dates of births with real names as well as combinations of all these examples."
The Indiana Voter Registration Project, run by a liberal super-PAC called Patriot Majority USA, suspected that the discrepancies were caused by outdated information in the state's voter rolls. The group was turning in new information it collected, but that information may not have matched older data in the state system. So the group hired a data analysis firm, TargetSmart, to assess the rolls. TargetSmart's report showed that Indiana's data was woefully out of date, including more than 800,000 instances in which the voter rolls did not contain the newest federal data. "We were turning in up-to-date data and it didn't match their old, flawed data," Buck told Mother Jones last fall.
But Indiana authorities presented the situation as much more insidious. "I'll tell you, in the state of Indiana right now, we've got a pretty vigorous investigation into voter fraud going on," Pence, campaigning as the Republican Party's vice presidential nominee, said in Iowa in October, a week after the raid shut the registration drive down. Shortly before leaving office, he awarded Lawson the state's highest civilian honor. Lawson will also serve on Trump's new commission.
The state police stated in affidavits released after the election that they believed that among the thousands of registration forms the group turned in were some that appeared to have been forged. From the evidence presented, it seemed likely that a few canvassers had fraudulently filled out applications. But Patriot Majority USA claimed it was vindicated by the release of these documents because, in addition to apparent evidence of forged applications, they also showed that the group's staff had flagged suspect applications for county authorities. Buck concedes it's possible that a few canvassers had broken the rules and forged applications, but that that could not account for the accusation of large-scale fraud from the Lawson's office. "[T]housands of dates of births and first names were changed," Lawson said in a statement last October. "We believe this may be a case of voter fraud and have turned our findings over to the State Police, who are currently conducting an investigation into alleged voter fraud." Buck says the claim that thousands of voters had their information altered is an indication that the rolls were out-of-date. "Their theory was that we were paying people to sit around and make up forms," he said. "Why would we be doing this? What would we have to gain?"
There is no evidence that any fraudulent ballots were ultimately cast. It wasn't even clear how forged registration forms or mismatched registration data could lead to in-person voter fraud, since Indiana has a law requiring voters to present identification. In late January, the state police finished their investigation and turned it over to the Marion County prosecutor to determine whether to file any charges. Contrary to Pence's statement, a spokeswoman for the prosecutor's office stressed that the police had not investigated voter fraud. "[T]he Indiana State Police investigated alleged voter registration discrepancies prior to the November 2016 election," Peg McLeish told Mother Jones in an email. "The investigation was not into fraudulent voting, that being ballots cast improperly." McLeish says the prosecutor has not yet decided whether to press charges.
Other states have used outdated voter registration to pursue legally dubious purgesof their voter rolls that disproportionately affect minority voters, who more often vote for Democrats. In 2010, Georgia instituted a policy of automatically rejecting a voter application form if the name, birth date, driver's license number, or last four Social Security number digits didn't exactly match the state's existing data. Over a three-year period, this resulted in 34,874 canceled applications, more than 75 percent of which were from minority applicants. In February, the state agreed to modify the practice as part of a court settlement with civil rights groups.
Voting rights advocates condemned Trump's order on Thursday. "As President Trump's own lawyers have said, 'All available evidence suggests that the 2016 general election was not tainted by fraud or mistake,'" Dale Ho, director of the American Civil Liberties Union's Voting Rights Project, said in a statement. "Signing a piece of paper will not make Trump's false statements about voter fraud true. This commission, to be co-led by King of Voter Suppression Kris Kobach, is a sham. We call on professional elections administrators, serious academics, and elected officials to refuse to participate in what will be a pretext for disenfranchising Americans."
The "only good news," election law expert Rick Hasen wrote on his blog, is that the "Administration's credibility is so low that few except the true believers are likely to believe anything produced by the likely worthless report."