NORTON META TAG

04 March 2019

Senate defeats anti-abortion bill, as GOP tries to jam Dems & MATTHEW 25: 31-46 25FEB19

Related image
GOP HYPOCRISY. Not the hypocrisy of Sen susan collins rf* ME detailed in this e mail from UltraViolet. I mean the institutionalized hypocrisy of the republican / gop greed over people party and their hypocritical right wing religious extremist supporters ( this includes protestants, catholics, jews, muslims, hindus, buddhist ). These people are anything but pro-life. The republican politicians consistently cut funding from the social safety net programs and the programs making up the American social contract, taking money from children and their families as well as the working poor and the working and middle classes and redistributing it to the 1%, to corporate America, to the war pigs and war profiteers of the military-industrial complex. They are even taking it from their right wing religious extremist, and these fools allow it because they are blinded by their own self-righteousness, their vile hatred of those they condemn as sinners. This legislation that was defeated in the U.S. Senate after all the lies, deception and propaganda spewed by the republicans and their right wing religious cabal is just more of their anti-life agenda. From UltraViolet and Politico.......
Senator Susan Collins built a career calling herself a "pro-choice Republican" who stands up for women’s rights.1
But then she voted to confirm Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh--the fifth vote to end Roe v. Wade.
Last week, Sen. Collins voted against abortion rights AGAIN, supporting a bill that smears women and abortion providers as murderers.2
UltraViolet Action is holding Sen. Collins accountable by making sure Mainers know the truth about her anti-choice votes. Will you chip in $40?
Sen. Collins talks a big game about reproductive rights. She once said she wanted Republicans to be "synonymous with a woman's right to choose."3 She calls herself pro-choice and has vowed to protect women's health care.4
But when Sen. Collins had the chance to stop Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh and truly protect Roe v. Wade, she sold out every woman in America.
Now that she's shown her true colors, it seems that Sen. Collins is going to keep trampling reproductive rights. Last week, she voted for an extreme bill that would threaten prison time for doctors who treat women facing the most heartbreaking complications later in pregnancy.5
The goal of this bill is to demonize women and doctors and make it more politically feasible for the Supreme Court to end Roe v. Wade. But Sen. Collins voted for it anyway. It's time that Sen. Susan Collins was held accountable to her anti-choice record, and we're going to make sure Maine people know how she is voting to take away reproductive rights.
Thank you for joining in.
--Shaunna, Kat, Karin, Holly, Kathy, Susan, Anathea, Audine, Emma, Pilar, Natalie, Melody, Lindsay, Pam, Ryan, Sonja, and Noma, the UltraViolet Action team
Sources:
3. Susan Collins’ Choice, Slate, September 5, 2018

Senate defeats anti-abortion bill, as GOP tries to jam Dems


 
The Senate on Monday rejected a bill making it a felony for a doctor to harm or neglect an infant who survives an “attempted abortion,” part of a Republican effort to squeeze Democrats ahead of the 2020 campaign.
The vote split mainly along party lines, 53-44. Democratic Sens. Bob Casey of Pennsylvania, Doug Jones of Alabama and Joe Manchin of West Virginia crossed the aisle to vote for it; no Republicans broke ranks. Sixty votes are required for the bill to advance.
“Evidently the far left is no longer convinced that all babies are created equal,” said Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.).
Ahead of the vote, the bill’s Republican sponsors and outside anti-abortion groups lobbying for its passage made it clear that the intent of Monday’s vote was to undermine the growing pool of Senate Democrats running for president.
In a speech just before the vote, bill author Sen. Ben Sasse quoted campaign stump speeches by Democratic Sens. Kamala Harris, Cory Booker, Elizabeth Warren, Kirsten Gillibrand and independent Bernie Sanders vowing to look out for society’s “voiceless and vulnerable” and accused them of hypocrisy for opposing his bill’s regulations for the care of newborns.
"Was that all just clap track for the campaign trail and for soundbites? Or do people mean the stuff that they say around here?" he said of his colleagues with White House aspirations.
Susan B. Anthony List, an anti-abortion group closely allied with Hill Republicans and the Trump administration, said Monday that it was “watching this vote closely to see whether leading Democratic candidates for president in 2020 will go on the record for or against infanticide.”
"This bill is important in itself but it‘s also important as a setup for the coming election, where there will be a stark contrast between the president of the United States and any one of the Democratic nominees," SBA List President Marjorie Dannenfelser said in an interview. She stood just outside the Senate chamber lobbying senators as they entered to cast their votes.
Sanders, Harris, Warren, Booker and Gillibrand all voted against the measure. Sherrod Brown, another Democratic senator exploring a White House bid, complained to POLITICO that the vote was held in bad faith.
"This is pure Mitch McConnell. It's all aimed at keeping his base in line, while the president grows increasingly unpopular," the Ohio Democrat said. "We're not doing infrastructure, we're not doing health care. We're not doing anything that matters to help our country. It's just votes on abortion and other kinds of divisive votes he's going to bring."
Democrats and reproductive rights advocates blasted the bill, saying it's already a felony to harm or neglect an infant and that the “medically irresponsible” bill would restricts doctors from making case-by-case decisions about what is best for infants and mothers.
"This bill is not about protecting infants, as Republicans have claimed — because that is not up for debate and it is already the law," said Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.). "This bill is government interference in women’s health care, in families’ lives, and in medicine on steroids."
The bill was previously introduced in the House by now-Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.). Sasse first tried to force a vote on it earlier this month, capitalizing on a wave of outrage among conservatives after New York loosened its restrictions on third-trimester abortions and embattled Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam gave an interview defending similar efforts in his state.
Democrats led by Murray objected to that fast-track procedure and blocked a floor vote, prompting Republicans to vow to try again.
Susan B. Anthony list said earlier this month that even though the Senate lacks the votes to pass abortion restrictions, it should continue to hold votes to put pressure on Democrats and divide the caucus. The move is part of a larger strategy designed to maintain current abortion restrictions while revving up the GOP’s conservative base ahead of 2020 and courting independents who may be turned off by Democrats' position on abortion rights.
"We're seeing a gradual movement to hammer a wedge right into the middle of the Democratic Party, and at some point soon here, they're just going to have to cry mercy," Dannenfelser said.

MATTHEW 25: 31-46

The Sheep and the Goats

31 “When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, he will sit on his glorious throne. 32 All the nations will be gathered before him, and he will separate the people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. 33 He will put the sheep on his right and the goats on his left.
34 “Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world. 35 For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, 36 I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’
37 “Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink?38 When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? 39 When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?’
40 “The King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’
41 “Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. 42 For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, 43 I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.’
44 “They also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’
45 “He will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’
46 “Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life.

No comments:

Post a Comment