NORTON META TAG

19 June 2018

Southern Border Crisis Has To Be Fixed By Congress, Gidley Says 19JUN18

Related image
LISTEN to this so you can hear what a repulsive jerk hogan gidley is (proving his qualification to be a spokesperson for the fascist drumpf/trump-pence administration) as he tries to defend separating undocumented families, children from parents, when they cross into the U.S. from Mexico. He is nasty, rude and gets madder as the interview goes on because the reporters do not want drumpf/trump lies repeated as answers to their questions. Click on the story header to hear the report. This from NPR.....

Southern Border Crisis Has To Be Fixed By Congress, Gidley Says

David Greene and Steve Inskeep talk to White House spokesman Hogan Gidley about the administration's policy to separate families at the southern border. NPR's Mara Liasson weighs in on the discussion.
DAVID GREENE, HOST:
Two sounds from the debate over border enforcement. Both were heard yesterday afternoon.
STEVE INSKEEP, HOST:
Both involve the Trump administration's zero tolerance policy, referring all people who cross the border illegally for criminal prosecution, even parents whose children are immediately taken away.
GREENE: At the White House, the secretary of Homeland Security, Kirstjen Nielsen, fiercely defended this policy.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
UNIDENTIFIED PERSON #1: Are you intending for this to play out as it is playing out? Are you intending for parents to be separated from their children? Are you intending to send a message?
KIRSTJEN NIELSEN: I find that offensive. No, because why would I ever create a policy that purposely does that?
GREENE: Nielsen maintained her agency is enforcing the law. Now, the same afternoon, ProPublica published an audiotape. It has not been verified from NPR but is described as a recording from inside a border detention facility. And you can hear children here wailing for their parents.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
UNIDENTIFIED CHILDREN: (Crying).
UNIDENTIFIED PERSON #2: (Foreign language spoken).
GREENE: A man is heard on the tape saying, we have an orchestra here. We're joined now by White House Deputy Press Secretary Hogan Gidley. Hogan, thanks for coming on the show. We appreciate it.
HOGAN GIDLEY: Absolutely. Thanks so much for the time.
GREENE: There's a moment on the tape there that we heard when a small girl sounds like she's trying to negotiate with adults, saying, at least can I go with my aunt? What do you say to Americans who are finding this just an unacceptable outcome?
GIDLEY: Well, it is. It's a very sad situation. You heard Secretary Nielsen make that point yesterday. You heard the president himself make that point from the North Lawn last week when he went out and surprised the country and basically did a gaggle there from the North Lawn - unscripted, unfettered. And he explained how much he hates the situation.
GREENE: Then why doesn't he just end it? Why doesn't he just end it if he hates the situation? I mean, this is a policy that was announced in a press release by the Department of Justice. Attorney General Jeff Sessions gave a speech. The White House chief of staff came on our air and said, explain the reasoning for separation, saying that it can be a deterrent. I mean, the president has the power to end this now.
GIDLEY: Well, what you're asking now is, why don't we just ignore the law? And that's something that this administration's not going to do. While previous administrations may have done that, it's our job as the executive branch to enforce the law.
GREENE: Can we be clear? What law forces the separation of parents from their children?
GIDLEY: Well, there are several, actually. One in the Flores consent agreement, which basically says that unaccompanied children can only be held for 20 days in custody with their parents. So after 20 days, by law, you have to release them. The problem with that is...
GREENE: But let me just follow up on that, if I can. That there...
GIDLEY: ...Furthering the separation of the family. The second part of that is a ruling by the most liberal court in the land - the 9th Circuit, which Liberals typically praise - made that 20-day limit to children also extend to accompanied minors when they come to this country as well. So the separation has to occur by law. And, in fact, in 2008, Congress passed a Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act.
GREENE: Let me just follow up on those laws you're mentioning, if I can - if I can, Hogan. I mean, before - are those - those rules were all in place previously, and the Trump administration decided to make a change in terms of how to enforce the law.
Alan Dershowitz, who's a lawyer - Harvard lawyer who President Trump often praises, has said that the president has every power right now to go back and reverse this decision that came from the Justice Department. Dershowitz even quoted Harry Truman as saying, the buck stops here. So does President Donald Trump really want to make the argument that the buck does not stop with him?
GIDLEY: Well, no. The buck stops with the people who make the laws in this country, and that's Congress. And they could change this right now.
GREENE: Well, let's...
GIDLEY: That is so simple for them to do. And they can make it where they could actually amend the Flores agreement, which is something that Secretary Nielsen talked about yesterday.
The three loopholes that actually cause the most problem are the 2008 TVPR rule, which actually encourages smuggling into this country. The second one is the Flores settlement agreement. You can change that to allow parents who come here illegally or who come here through ports of entry and claim asylum to be united with their children for the duration. The problem is...
INSKEEP: Well, Mr. Gidley, if I can...
GIDLEY: ...Once they claim asylum, it takes longer than 20 days, so you have to separate, by law, the children from their parents. It's a horrible situation, but your hands are tied when the law dictates that's what happens.
INSKEEP: Well, let's just look into that because you mentioned members of Congress who disagree that your hands are tied, or disagree that this is the sole thing that you can do.
We had on the program yesterday Republican Representative Will Hurd. He's a Texas representative. He represents a lot of the border, as you probably know. And he said there certainly are alternatives to this policy which the president could choose under the law. Let's listen to a little bit of that.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED BROADCAST)
WILL HURD: We should be working with the governments in El Salvador and some of these other countries in Central America to address the root causes that is causing this migration. We need more immigration judges. We need to be doing alternatives to detentions, which keeps a family together. And we need to have smart border security.
All of these things we can do, and we should be prioritizing this rather than spending the time of building tent cities and trying to separate kids from their parents.
INSKEEP: He's saying that you are not - you do not have your hands tied. Your sole choice is not tent cities - that that's a false statement.
GIDLEY: What he's also saying is that he wants to work with governments of El Salvador, and that's fine. But he's refusing to work within the government of the United States, which could clearly fix this in no time.
If Congress would come together, close these loopholes, we wouldn't have this problem. You're emboldening child smuggling. You're emboldening drug smuggling. You're making all of the woes and ills that are occurring right now in this country appear as though they cannot be fixed.
But for the executive branch, that's just not the case. A permanent, lasting solution is what President Donald Trump wants. He put forth a 70-point immigration plan nine months ago that would've fixed this. You guys covered extensively the Schumer shutdown when that occurred as well, clearly delineating what the president wanted between what Democrats wanted.
We tried to fix this on multiple occasions, even up to and including giving three times the amount of DACA recipients that Barack Obama offered. And Donald Trump even offered permanent citizenship, whereas Barack Obama only offered legalization.
INSKEEP: OK. OK. I...
GIDLEY: He's been over backwards trying to get this fixed, and Congress can fix it today.
INSKEEP: I understand you want to review that, and I appreciate the review. But let's listen to the way that this debate has been confused.
President Trump has made it clear, at least to the ears of our correspondents, that he wants leverage in this broader immigration negotiation that you are talking about. That's one of the reasons he's pursuing this policy. He's also blaming the policy on Democrats. Let's listen to some of the president.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: If the Democrats would sit down instead of obstructing, we could have something done very quickly - good for the children, good for the country, good for the world. It could take place quickly.
INSKEEP: Anthony Scaramucci - friend of the president, former adviser to the president - tweets the following, you can't simultaneously argue that family separation isn't happening, that it is being used as a deterrent, that the Bible justifies it and that it's the Democrats' fault. The president is not being served well by his advisers on this issue, says Anthony Scaramucci. Why are you muddying the issue so much?
GIDLEY: I'm not muddying anything. This can be fixed, and must be fixed, from Congress. They make the laws. The laws say the procedures that are followed by DHS and by custom border protection are the ones that have to be followed. And you can change that.
But let's - let's just drill down exactly what you're asking here. What Democrats are telling us - offering no solution, by the way, just ratcheted-up rhetoric. They're saying, you can't deport families. You can't deport families. You can't detain families, and you can't prosecute families.
INSKEEP: I just want to say one last time...
GIDLEY: But what they want is for them to be released into the interior of the country without any documentation, without any paperwork. That's not what we can do as an enforcement branch of the federal government. We have to enforce the laws.
INSKEEP: Just to be clear one last time, this a policy change that was made by the attorney general of the United States in May.
GIDLEY: No. No, no, no, no, no. It wasn't a policy change. We decided that we were going to uphold the law...
INSKEEP: OK.
GIDLEY: ...The law that had been put in place in 1997 under Bill Clinton in the Flores settlement agreement, a ruling by the 9th Circuit, again, that followed, I think 2014. And then also...
INSKEEP: OK. We've gone through that.
GIDLEY: ...2008 under George W. Bush.
INSKEEP: We've gone through that.
GIDLEY: Don't pretend like this is new. Barack Obama separated families as well. That's what the law dictates.
INSKEEP: OK. Hogan Gidley, thanks very much. Really appreciate you taking the time.
GIDLEY: Absolutely. I hate the situation, but it's got to be fixed by Congress.
INSKEEP: Understood. White House spokesman Hogan Gidley.
GREENE: Just want to bring in for a second here NPR national political correspondent Mara Liasson. And, Mara, Gidley there making the argument that the president's hands are tied. Is anything stopping the president of the United States from calling Attorney General Jeff Sessions and saying, reverse this now?
MARA LIASSON, BYLINE: No, and many Republicans in Congress have said that he can do that. Now the problem is that when you decide that you're going to have zero tolerance, meaning you are going to enforce the law against every single illegal border crosser, then, yes, you have to separate families.
But prosecutors always have discretion. For instance, there are 11 million people in this country illegally. If you had a zero tolerance policy towards them, you'd be rounding up millions of people right now. But the government doesn't. It prioritizes. It says, we're only going to deport people with criminal records, or we're going to make that our priority. In this case, they chose a different priority.
GREENE: And I think the word, priority, was even in the press release that came from the Justice Department. NPR national political correspondent Mara Liasson. Mara, thanks a lot.
LIASSON: Thank you.
(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)
Copyright © 2018 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.
NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Giant Hogweed, The Plant That Causes Burns And Permanent Blindness, Is Spreading In The US 19JUN18


I have seen a couple of these back home in Pennsylvania, they were taller than me (I'm 5'7")! I don't really care for herbicides but I won't hesitate to use it on these nasty plants! Share this article from BuzzFeed with everyone......

Giant Hogweed, The Plant That Causes Burns And Permanent Blindness, Is Spreading In The US

This is the giant hogweed. Seems like a regular old plant, right?

Ullstein Bild / Getty Images / Via gettyimages.com

WRONG. This is an evil, demon plant and you should avoid it at all costs.

Ullstein Bild / Getty Images / Via gettyimages.com

Giant hogweed is an invasive species that's known to grow in some states in the US, but last week it was discovered for the first time in Virginia.

Facebook: MasseyHerbarium
Giant hogweed, or Heracleum mantegazzianum, is a large, flowering, perennial plant. It's native to the Caucasus Mountain region in Asia and was introduced to the US in the early 1900s as a garden plant, according to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC).
It is an invasive species that is known to grow in New York, Vermont, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Wisconsin, Michigan, Oregon, and Washington. Giant hogweed is listed as a noxious weed by the federal government, which means it's illegal to transport across state lines without a permit.
The Massey Herbarium at the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and University, which researches plant species in the state, wrote in a Facebook post that it had identified Virginia's first giant hogweed population. The organization discovered about 30 plants in Clarke County, which is located in the Northern part of the state, about 60 miles west of Washington, DC.
This invasive species isn't just a problem for the environment — it's also a health hazard.

The giant hogweed's sap can cause blistering burns on the skin, long-lasting scars, and even permanent blindness.

Bob Kleinberg / NYS DEC
    The plant produces a toxic sap full of photosensitizing furanocoumarins, which are organic chemicals that can do some serious damage. When the sap makes contact with the skin and is combined with sunlight it can cause severe irritation, burns, and blisters (also called phytophotodermatitis), according to NYSDEC.
    Basically, the sap makes the skin incredibly photosensitive so it can't protect itself and sunlight causes a third-degree burn. (That's the most serious type of burn and the outer skin layer, or epidermis, is harmed, in addition to the layers underneath, or dermis.) The irritation can worsen if there is moisture, such as dew on the plant or sweat on the skin. People are usually exposed to the sap when they brush against the bristles of the plant or break the stems and leaves.
    The skin reaction can start as soon as 15 minutes after exposure. It usually takes about 48 hours for the painful blisters to form, which can then become pigmented and scab over. It can take weeks to heal and the scars from hogweed burns can last for months or even years.
    Scars aren't the only permanent damage resulting from contact with a hogweed. If the sap gets into the eyes, it can burn the cornea (the eye's outermost layer) and cause permanent blindness.








This botanical nightmare can grow up to 14 feet tall and you'll find it in forests, yards, fields, and roadsides. Do not touch it.

Ullstein Bild / Getty Images / Via gettyimages.com
    The giant hogweed is an absolute unit. It can take a few years for the plant to mature and start producing flowers, which is when it's easiest to recognize. The hogweed can grow to towering heights and sprout leaves up to 5 feet wide and has flowers up to 2.5 feet wide.
    These plants can also live for decades and have long taproots that make them especially hardy and difficult to remove. Giant hogweed can grow anywhere — gardens, backyards, along streams and rivers, hiking trails — so it's important to know what the plant looks like so you can avoid it in the future.
    Giant hogweed is a tall plant with white flowers in umbrella-like clusters, lobed leaves, and stems covered in purplish-red spots. But the plant isn't always easy to identify and can be easy to confuse with other flowering plants like Queen Anne's Lace. Queen Anne's Lace, which is also known as wild carrot, is beautiful, harmless, and can be found in wedding bouquets and roadsides near you — so don't mistake it for the giant hogweed!
    You can consult the NYSDEC hogweed identification guide to learn how to spot the dangerous plant.
    Do not go near or touch this plant. The sap is concentrated on the stems but it can get anywhere on the plant or its flowers. If you need to remove giant hogweed on your property, wear gloves, cover any exposed skin, and wash all clothes and equipment that touch the plant afterward. Here's a complete list of hogweed removal safety guidelines.

    If you are exposed to giant hogweed sap, wash your skin with cold water, stay out of sunlight, and consult a physician if you have concerns.

    Gavin Edmondstone / Flickr CC / Via Flickr: gavin_edmondstone
    If the worst happens, there are steps you can take to ease the pain and reduce the severity of the reaction. First you should wash the area of skin immediately with cold water. Because the sap makes the skin photosensitive, keep the exposed area out of sunlight for at least 48 hours, according to NYSDEC. If you get sap in your eyes, wash them out immediately and wear sunglasses.
    Once the skin reaction starts, you can use topical steroids such as calamine lotion or painkilling creams to ease inflammation and discomfort. It's a good idea to stay out of the sun and wear protective clothing or sunscreen until it has healed — the scars can be sensitive to sunlight for years.
    If you ever have any questions or concerns about a reaction to giant hogweed sap, contact a physician.

    There you have it — beware of this monster plant. It is out to get you.

    Dea / Getty Images / Via gettyimages.com

No, The Gospel Isn’t “Good News” For Everyone 19JUN18


I am posting articles about the Christian denominations and people of faith who are speaking out and organizing against the neo-nazi fascist policies and actions of the drumpf/trump administration. IT is a sad comment on the publicly declared Christian faith of those who instruct undocumented children to be separated from their parents and the children, mothers and fathers be kept in poorly supplied cages. I will leave the judging of their Christianity to God because I too am a sinner. BUT I am free to state that their Christianity, their gospel of greed, bigotry, hate, un-compassion and their alt-Jesus is not the Christianity and Jesus was taught and who I believe in. This from Formerly Fundie Benjamin L Corey.....

No, The Gospel Isn’t “Good News” For Everyone

Over the years I’ve been fond of saying, “if the Gospel isn’t good news for everyone, it isn’t good news for anyone.”
When I’ve said it, I believed it and said it with sincerity. I can also recognize that I said it in part to push-back against the faith of my youth which essentially proclaimed a gospel that is bad, bad, news for the majority of human beings who have ever lived. Pushing back on things that are wrong is good– but sometimes we can push too far in the opposite direction, not because it’s true or accurate, but for the sake of distancing ourselves from the alternative.
But today, I admit: I was wrong. The Gospel isn’t good news for everyone.
I have never been more aware of this as I have been this past week when reading stories of the Trump administration’s practice of separating children from their families at our southern border, and housing them in cages like animals at best– or handing them off to human traffickers at worst.
This feeling inside me has been building as I have read stories of children crying for their mothers. It’s festered as I’ve seen pictures of where the children are kept–pictures that look like my local dog kennel instead of a place for children. And it surely boiled over as I read an article by former First Lady Laura Bush, who reported that government officials who warehouse these children are instructed not to touch, pick up, or comfort children who are crying.
Hogar de Paul Harris, 2011. Benjamin L. Corey photo.
While I live in Maine and am about as far away from the southern border as one can get, these stories strike eerily close to home for me. You see, on the day I became a father it wasn’t in the delivery room of our local hospital. My first glimpse of my two wonderful daughters wasn’t as the nurse wrapped them in blankets, proclaiming “both girls!”
No, my first glimpse of my children was seeing them wave to me through the bars of the cage they were locked in.
I had no idea the first time I’d lay eyes on my children there would be a steel door with bars and a prominent lock in the middle separating us. I had always imagined our first moment would be filled with overflowing emotions of joy, but instead, as I saw my girls reach out between the bars to get our attention, the first emotion that filled my heart was absolute fury at the realization they had been waiting and locked in a cage all this time.
And so when I read stories of children being ripped from their mother’s arms, when I see images of cages that have little humans in them instead of dogs, and when I hear reports of children crying and needing comfort– but those tasked with caring for them being prohibited from picking them up, touching them, or soothing them, I realize I have been beyond erroneous in saying the Gospel is good news for everyone.
No, no, no– it is not.
The Gospel is not good news for those who rip children out of the arms of their mothers as they flee from places of poverty and violence.
The Gospel is not good news for those who toss these children in cages, subjecting them to additional trauma.
The Gospel is not good news for those who prohibit touching or comforting crying children, nor is it good news for those who obey such immoral directives.
For those who make these unjust policies, for those who carry them out even in the name of keeping their jobs, and for those who support the oppressors who enact these policies that destroy families and traumatize children, the Gospel is actually no-good-very-bad-news.
Regardless of theological position or nuance of what does or does not happen in the afterlife, what cannot be denied for anyone who claims to follow Jesus is that he clearly and articulately warned of a coming judgement. In fact, he laid it out in Matthew 25 so there were no questions: at the final judgement there will be two groups of people, and one will face divine punishment.
As much as I hate to spoil the surprise for those who haven’t gotten to this part of the Bible yet, it’s not “the gays, fake news media, and ‘godless progressives'” who get separated from the pack in order to receive their punishment.
Those who face the wrath of God, Jesus said, are those who did not welcome the immigrant, who did not clothe the naked, or feed the hungry. And specifically regarding harming children, let me remind you, is an act where Jesus said it would be better to have a rock tied around your neck and be thrown into the deepest ocean.
No matter which way you spin it, the Gospel is not good news for everyone if you believe Jesus.
No… it’s actually no-good-horrible-news for those who enact, support, or participate in the Trump administration’s unconscionable actions of ripping children out of the arms of their mothers, and then locking these children in cages.