NORTON META TAG

13 September 2014

Pennsylvania Teenager Simulates Oral Sex With Jesus Statue, Faces 2 Years in Prison 12SEP14

I think what this kid did is ignorant and blasphemy and if he, while being ignorant, broke the law in Pennsylvania and is being punished he has nobody to blame but himself. I included my interesting back and forth with a few others from the comments section. Just to give you an idea of the mentality of some of the people posting comments I offer this example (click the article title to go to Mother Jones and see all the comments)




Not a chance such a blasphemy law would survive a constitutional challenge.
And if I'm wrong, then I will suck Christ's penis until ejaculation.

I find his comment repulsive, but am thankful for the First Amendment of our constitution. This kid's actions are not covered by the First Amendment though, and as I said in one of my post he is lucky the prosecutor didn't charge him with a hate crime because he chose to go to the property of a religious organization and desecrate a religious statue on that property. From +Mother Jones .....
| Fri Sep. 12, 2014 1:39 PM EDT

Teenagers are prone to dumb, tasteless pranks, but one 14-year-old is facing prison time for his latest stunt. The teen, from Everett, Pennsylvania, hopped on top of a statue of a kneeling Jesus—in front of an organization called "Love in the Name of Christ"—and simulated oral sex with the statue's face. Naturally, he posted the pictures to Facebook, which made their way to authorities.
Officials in Bedford County charged the teen (whose name hasn't been released) with desecration of a venerated object, invoking a 1972 Pennsylvania statute that criminalizes "defacing, damaging, polluting or otherwise physically mistreating in a way that the actor knows will outrage the sensibilities of persons likely to observe or discover the action." You'd think an appropriate punishment for a kid violating this seldom-invoked law might be picking up trash or, at worst, paying a fine. If convicted, he faces much worse: two years in juvenile detention.
Truth Wins Out, a LGBT advocacy nonprofit, has argued that the law is unconstitutional because it violates the establishment clause—"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion"—and free speech rights—"Congress shall make no law abridging the right to hump a statue of Jesus."
Pennsylvania is not the only state with a "venerated objects" law—many states have some version of it, but most define "desecration" as vandalizing or otherwise physically harming an object of civic or religious significance. Alabama, Tennessee, and Oregon have laws like Pennsylvania's, which can be interpreted to punish individuals—like this bold, dumb teenager—who simply decide to do something offensive.
FROM THE COMMENTS SECTION



If this fool had these kind of fantasies he should have kept them to himself, sharing only with those of similar poor taste. He posted this trash on line and is being held responsible. His choice, his actions, his responsibility, now his punishment. He has nobody to blame but himself.



really? you got trash on fucks news everyday and nobody cares. what's wrong with you?




Yes, really. Yo do prove the old saying about assuming anything because you assume I do not care about the trash on faux news. I do, and comment on it when I want to, because I have the right to. You seem to have a problem with me commenting on this story, so I have to ask, what's wrong with you?

MORE FROM COMMENT SECTION



Let's be clear, MoJo: the teenager was displaying a sense of humour. There's nothing particularly "dumb" about making an oral sex joke with a statue: it's funny, and it's harmless. This kid did absolutely nothing wrong, and he should obviously counter-sue for a violation of his constitutional rights to free expression.



Put a statue of your mother and father and yourself in your front yard with a sign encouraging people to have their picture taken while simulating oral sex with them, start facebook, pinterest and tumbler pages and post these pictures there and lets see how you mom, dad, family and community reacts to your "sense of humor".


  • It's not a crime to offend someone.



  • While they'd obviously be offended, "being offensive" shouldn't land anyone in jail.



    • Don't answer for ryan mccourt, I want to see what he has to say about my suggestion and if he is man enough to do it. I'll bet, if he is, and I doubt he is, after a few who share his "sense of humor" stop by for photo sessions he will be calling the police because he, or someone in his family or community, finds their actions offensive.




      • A straw man argument.
        First of all, if anyone put a statue of his mother and father if his front yard, the whole community would know he is a weirdo and would already be laughing at him.



      • I don't see that proposing false equivalence in the form of some macho dare is really any kind of meaningful attempt at an argument, but you go ahead and knock yourself out waiting for the other guy to respond.



        This isn't false equivalence. The statue of Christ means something to some people and this kid made the choice to disrespect their religious beliefs and perform this offensive act in violation of the law. Ryan McCourt says the kid was displaying a sense of humor. I want to see how much humor he would see in someone humping his mom's, dad's or his face on a statue. There has been a lot said in these comments about respecting the rights of non-believers / atheist, but believers are entitled to the same respect. As far as the actual law and punishment of this kid, because he did this on the grounds of a religious organization he can consider himself lucky the prosecutor didn't consider charging him with a hate crime because he deliberately chose that religious site to desecrate that religious statue.

No comments:

Post a Comment