L'Abominable Tim Hudak et la connexion Koch et les frères Koch social, économique et politique hégémonie au CANADA 16MAI14

Non content de le nombre de repiglican, thé-bagger et troisième façon démocrates qu'ils contrôlent dans le gouvernement au niveau local, étatique et nationale en Amérique les frères Koch ont élargi leur campagne pour faire baisser le chômage, sous-emploi, la stagnation économique, la destruction de la vie sociale filet de sécurité et la ploutocratie au Canada. Ils ont trouvé les politiciens qui peuvent être achetés pour répandre leurs mensonges et de la désinformation avec la manipulation des désirs de canadiens pour l'avenir de leur pays à travers une campagne de propagande qui présente ses propositions politiques, économiques et sociaux que les meilleurs plans pour améliorer la vie de tous au Canada . À tout le moins les Canadiens devraient être outrés par l'hégémonie économique, politique et sociale de l'American frères Koch et leurs alliés riches américains. Tous nos voisins du Nord ont à faire pour voir les résultats de 10 ans d'koch frères des politiques économiques et sociales dictées est de regarder l'état lamentable de l'économie américaine, la hausse obscène de la richesse des frères Koch et leur riche et alliés d'entreprise, la décimation du filet américain de la sécurité sociale, l'assaut sur ​​les droits civils et les libertés civiles, la lutte sociale mijoter à travers le pays, l'impasse politique à tous les niveaux de gouvernement, en particulier à Washington, DC et le transfert régulier de notre République démocratique dans une ploutocratie théocratique (les frères Koch sont pas religieux, ils sont consommés avec la soif de pouvoir et la cupidité, mais ils ont été en mesure d'obtenir le soutien de beaucoup de gens religieux par la manipulation et de pervertir les enseignements de base de nombreuses religions, notamment le christianisme). Soyez averti, une fois ceux-droite extrémiste commencent à accéder au pouvoir et leurs politiques légiféré, il est très difficile de renverser la vapeur. J'espère que les Canadiens agissent en temps pour garder leur pays sortir du trou de l'enfer les frères Koch nous poussent dans.

L'Abominable Tim Hudak et la connexion Koch

Je dois admettre que je trouve parfois difficile de prendre au sérieux Tim Hudak. Il est une telle bévue, un tel militant minable, un loser.

Jusqu'à ce que je me souviens qu'après Stephen Harper qu'il est le Con plus bestial au Canada, et un clone républicain s'il en est un.

Un homme qui vit pour le buste syndicats, à faire baisser salaires, et souffler Big Business comme un aspirateur.   Un voyou politique qui croit en bandes de la chaîne.

Et une ensacheuse de thé horrible qui a obtenu son plan insensé de créer des emplois en les tuant, à partir d'une droite économiste américain fou qui travaille pour les  frères Koch . 



Rencontrez Benjamin Zycher, le Big Oil souteneur, le changement climatique denier, le briseur de syndicat fou.

En Septembre 2013, Zycher était l'auteur principal d'un rapport publié par l'aile droite de réflexion qui rend le cas pour l'américaine, anti- union "droit au travail" lois de la Colombie-Britannique et de l'Ontario; il veut «interdire les conventions collectives entre les employeurs et les syndicats de forcer les travailleurs représentés par un syndicat de verser des cotisations pour sa représentation." 

Zycher, en s'appuyant sur ​​des enquêtes américaines de "droit au travail" Etats, selon les syndicats éviscération créeraient 56 000 emplois dans Ontario et augmenter le PIB de 11 milliards de dollars.

L'larbin payé des frères Koch, les uber milliardaires de droite qui, entre autres choses, ont contribué à installer le brutal républicain Scott Walker, le gouverneur du Wisconsin.



Qui a fait de cet état, ses pauvres, le gouvernement les travailleurs et les syndicats, exactement ce que Tom Hudak ferait en Ontario.

Parce que M. Hudak est Walker, Walker est Hudak, il n'ya aucune différence. 

Et c'est ainsi que les frères Koch aka Le Kochtopus veulent ...



des cousins ​​idéologiques américains de Stephen Harper. Ceux qui possèdent une grande partie des sables bitumineux, et à gagner le plus de l'oléoduc Keystone.

Les étoiles de cet excellent nouveau film bientôt à un théâtre près de chez vous ...

http://youtu.be/gY4kJlIkjqw 


Et oui, croyez-le ou non, de ces fanatiques de droite américains sinistres ne Tim Hudak tirer son inspiration.

Pour si peu d'inspiration et le jugement de son propre t-il, qu'il  aurait son travail fou tuant plans "analysé" par un homme qui croit aussi la seule raison Michelle Obama a obtenu un diplôme de Princeton parce qu'elle est noire ...



Maintenant laissez-moi être franc: Michelle Obama, le produit de vie dorloter action positive, est une légère intellectuelle qui se considère un penseur sérieux. Il suffit de lire sa thèse Princeton senior, un tas de jargon gauchiste intermittence cohérente flux de la conscience, campus pseudo-gravité, et babiller raciale identité. Peut-il y avoir aucun doute que les administrateurs Princeton acceptés seulement en raison de sa couleur de peau?

Pouvez-vous le croire? C'est l'expert économiste Tim Hudak?

Mais bien sûr, tout cela fait sens, pour ne pas être trompé. Hudak peut être un bouffon de Con et un perdant, mais il ya des intérêts puissants dans ce pays qui rendraient Scott Walker de lui l'Ontario. 

Il tournait la province en un champ de bataille. Il est un extrémiste de style américain dangereux ..



Un vrai monstre, qui jetterait des centaines de milliers de personnes dans la rue, tout en donnant une grande entreprise encore plus juteux avantages fiscaux.

Et avec son bon ami, et collègue Koch meunier Stephen Harper, il aiderait à changer ce pays au-delà de la reconnaissance, et la transformer en une jungle de Con.



Parce que tous ceux qui pensent que M. Hudak est seulement le problème de l'Ontario est dangereusement illusoire. Il s'agit d'une bien plus grande conspiration, et les tentacules de la Kochtopus sont partout.

Et les bonnes nouvelles? Jusqu'à présent, les gens de l'Ontario ne sont pas acheter le plan Hudak / Koch.

Près des deux tiers des Ontariens désapprouvent le plan de Tim Hudak à couper 100 000 fonctionnaires de rationaliser le gouvernement, un nouveau sondage suggère.

Et si ce sondage est correcte, l'horrible Kochzilla semble avoir perdu son avance initiale encore plus rapide que lui dans la dernière élection.

du Kathleen Wynne libéraux au pouvoir mènent maintenant avec 38 pour cent d'appui à 35 pour cent pour les conservateurs, 21 pour cent pour les néo-démocrates d'Andrea Horwath, et ​​5 pour cent pour les Verts de Mike Schreiner.

Cependant, puisque l'opposition est divisée, et de Harper sont des bandes Hudak à la poignée, je prends pas de chance hein?

c'est pourquoi je lui ai ajouté officiellement à ma liste d'ennemi aujourd'hui, avec ces autres comparses Con ...



Parce que je ne sais pas pour vous. Mais je suis en train de vraiment malade et fatigué de ces RepubliCons exotiques qui tueraient nos emplois, nous vendre à des étrangers, d'agir comme des animaux, et d'essayer de transformer notre pays en fou Amerika.

Soyons tout à fait clair, nous ne serons pas au Canada .  Et nous ne serons pas en sécurité, 

Jusqu'à ce que tous trois d'entre eux ont été vaincus.

Et le cauchemar de M. Hudak Ontario est plus qu'un mauvais souvenir ...

The Abominable Tim Hudak and the Koch Connection & The koch brothers Social, Economic and Political Hegemony in CANADA 16MAI14

NOT content with the number of repiglican, tea-bagger and third way democrats they control in the government at the local, state and national level in America the koch brothers have expanded their campaign to bring unemployment, underemployment, economic stagnation, destruction of the social safety net and plutocracy to Canada. They have found politicians who can be purchased to spread their lies and misinformation with manipulation of Canadian's desires for the future of their country through a propaganda campaign that presents their political, economic and social proposals as the best plans to improve the lives of all in Canada. At the least Canadians should be outraged at the economic, political and social hegemony of the American koch brothers and their wealthy American allies. All our neighbors to the North have to do to see the results of 10+ years of koch brothers dictated economic and social policies is look at the sorry state of the American economy, the obscene increase in the wealth of the koch brothers and their rich and corporate allies, the decimation of the American social safety net, the assault on civil rights and civil liberties, the simmering social strife across the nation, political gridlock at all levels of government, especially in Washington, D.C. and the steady devolution of our democratic Republic into a theocratic plutocracy (the koch brothers are not religious, they are consumed with lust for power and greed, BUT they have been able to get the support of many religious people by manipulating and perverting the basic teachings of many religions, especially Christianity). BE WARNED, once these right wing extremist start to gain power and have their policies legislated it is very difficult to reverse course. I hope the Canadian people act in time to keep their country out of the hell hole the koch brothers are dragging us into.

The Abominable Tim Hudak and the Koch Connection

I have to admit that I sometimes find it hard to take Tim Hudak seriously. He's such a goof, such a lousy campaigner, such a loser.

Until I remember that after Stephen Harper he is the most beastly Con in Canada, and  a Republican clone if ever there was one.

A man who lives to bust unions, drive down wages, and blow Big Business like a hoover.  A political thug who believes in chain gangs.

And a ghastly tea bagger who got his insane plan to create jobs by killing them, from a kooky right-wing American economist who works for the Koch brothers. 



Meet Benjamin Zycher, the Big Oil pimp, the climate change denier, the crazed union buster.

In September 2013, Zycher was the lead author of a report published by the right-wing think tank that makes the case for American-style, anti-union "right to work" laws in British Columbia and Ontario; he wants to "prohibit collective bargaining agreements between employers and unions from forcing workers represented by a union to pay dues for its representation." 

Zycher, drawing on American surveys of "right to work" states, claimed that gutting unions would create 56,000 jobs in Ontario and boost GDP by $11 billion.

The paid stooge of the Koch brothers, the uber right wing billionaires who among other things, helped install the brutish Republican Scott Walker as the Governor of Wisconsin.



Who did to that state, its poor people, government workers, and unions, EXACTLY what Tom Hudak would do to Ontario.

Because Hudak is Walker, Walker is Hudak, there is no difference. 

And that's the way the Koch brothers aka The Kochtopus want it...



Stephen Harper's ideological American cousins. The ones who own a big chunk of the oil sands, and stand to gain the most from the Keystone Pipeline.

The stars of this excellent new movie coming soon to a theatre near you...

http://youtu.be/gY4kJlIkjqw 


And yes, believe it or not, from those sinister American right-wing fanatics does Tim Hudak draw his inspiration.

For so little inspiration and judgement of his own does he have, that he would have his kooky job killing plans "analyzed"  by a man who also believes the only reason Michelle Obama got a degree from Princeton was because she's BLACK...



Now let me be blunt: Michelle Obama,the product of lifelong affirmative-action coddling, is an intellectual lightweight who considers herself a serious thinker. Just read her Princeton senior thesis, an intermittently coherent stream-of-consciousness pile of leftist jargon, campus pseudo-seriousness, and racial-identity babble. Can there be any doubt that the Princeton administrators accepted it only because of her skin colour?

Can you believe it? That's Tim Hudak's economic expert?

But of course it all makes sense, for don't be deceived. Hudak may be a Con buffoon and a loser, but there are powerful interests in this country that would make him Ontario's Scott Walker. 

He would turn the province into a battleground. He is a dangerous American-style extremist..



A real monster, who would throw hundreds of thousands of people into the street, while giving Big Business even more juicy tax breaks.

And along with his good buddy, and fellow Koch sucker Stephen Harper, he would help change this country beyond recognition, and turn it into a Con JUNGLE.



Because anyone who thinks that Hudak is just Ontario's problem is dangerously deluded. This is a much bigger conspiracy, and the tentacles of the Kochtopus are EVERYWHERE.

And the good news? So far the people of Ontario aren't buying the Hudak/Koch Plan.

Nearly two-thirds of Ontarians disapprove of Tim Hudak’s plan to cut 100,000 public servants to streamline government, a new poll suggests.

And if this poll is correct, the ghastly Kochzilla appears to have lost his initial lead even quicker than he did in the last election.

Kathleen Wynne’s governing Liberals now lead with 38 per cent support to 35 per cent for the Conservatives, 21 per cent for Andrea Horwath’s New Democrats, and 5 per cent for Mike Schreiner’s Greens.

However, since the opposition is divided, and the Harperites are backing Hudak to the hilt, I'm taking no chances eh?

Which is why I officially added him to my Enemy List today, along with these other  Con stooges...



Because I don't know about you. But I'm getting REALLY sick and tired of those alien RepubliCons who would kill our jobs, sell us out to foreigners, act like animals, and try to turn our country into crazy Amerika.

And let's be absolutely clear, we will not be Canada. And we will not be safe, 

Until all three of them have been defeated.

And Hudak's nightmare Ontario is just a bad memory...

The Case for Canamerica The far-out, incredibly earnest argument for why the U.S. should merge with its northern neighborThe Case for CanAmerica Le far-out, un argument très sérieux pour expliquer pourquoi les Etats-Unis devrait fusionner avec son nord neighbor.3OKT13

HERE is a really interesting article considering a merger of America and Canada from Foreign Policy magazine. The thought has to horrifying to Canadians as they watch our federal government meltdown. And, as pointed out it the article, it has to be horrifying to repiglicans and tea-baggers because they would never get a president elected or control the government. No big surprise the author's main interest in such a union is increasing corporate profits, in her proposal the union would extend the American plutocracy seizing control here. Canadians will rightly dismiss this proposal unless their health care system and workers rights and other social justice laws were adopted by America. Canada, you're a good friend, a good neighbor, and I hope this merger never happens in my lifetime, for your sake....
Voici un article très intéressant compte tenu de la fusion d'Amérique et au Canada par le magazine Foreign Policy. La pensée doit horrible pour les Canadiens comme ils regardent notre effondrement du gouvernement fédéral. Et, comme l'a souligné qu'il l'article, il doit être horrible à repiglicans et thé ensacheurs parce qu'ils n'obtiendraient jamais un président élu ou contrôler le gouvernement. Pas de grosse surprise d'intérêt principal de l'auteur dans une telle union augmente les bénéfices des sociétés, dans sa proposition, l'Union étendrait la ploutocratie américaine prenant le contrôle ici. Les Canadiens seront à juste titre rejeter cette proposition à moins que leur système de soins de santé et les droits des travailleurs et les autres lois de la justice sociale ont été adoptées par l'Amérique. Canada, vous êtes un bon ami, un bon voisin, et j'espère que cette fusion ne se produit jamais dans ma vie, pour toi ....

The far-out, incredibly earnest argument for why the U.S. should merge with its northern neighbor.

BY J. DANA STUSTER | OCTOBER 3, 2013

Imagine, if you will, a moment in the not-too-distant future: A decades-long effort by Chinese companies to infiltrate Canadian banking and drilling firms has succeeded in securing Canada's oil and natural gas fields for pillage. At least some money from these deals trickles into Ottawa's coffers, which is more than the government can say for its oil in the Arctic, where Canada has been muscled out of its claims by extraction companies with the backing of the Russian government. A network of Chinese ports has secured the sea lines along the Northwest Passage, circumscribing Canadian sovereignty, and Canada's military, enfeebled after years of reliance on the United States, is powerless to resist. Canada effectively lapses into a vassal state, reliant on neocolonial patriarchs in Beijing and Moscow.

Share o

This dystopian scenario isn't the plot of an episode of The Twilight Zoneor some modish alternate-history, sci-fi story -- it's the threat laid out by Diane Francis, a veteran business reporter and current editor at large of Canada's National Post, in her newly released book, Merger of the Century: Why Canada and America Should Become One Country. And while she frames the book as a "thought experiment," she believes a U.S.-Canadian union is essential to both countries' futures -- that facing economic infringement, "a merger makes good business sense." She's thought it through, down to the last dollar each Canadian should be compensated for their natural resources in a U.S. buyout.

"The Russians have thrown down the gauntlet in the Arctic.… And the Chinese have targeted our resources, along with everyone else's," Francis told Foreign Policy by phone from Canada. They're "the wolves at the door," Francis says; she frames the situation in terms of "prey and predator" in the book. "They're gaming the system," she told FP. "And I think they're brilliant. I think they're doing a great job feeding their population, frankly, and educating them, but we understand that they have an objective." Their goal is to break into the biggest, wealthiest markets: the United States and the European Union. "Canada is … peripheral to the United States, as Turkey is [to the EU], and you'll notice that the Chinese start to do business not in the EU, but in the periphery -- Bulgaria, Turkey. They just landed a big contract for their avionics, their air-traffic controls. They're building bridges; they're building roads." Canada, she says, "is a back-door entry into the main markets that they really want to get into but are somewhat prevented from."

For now, the United States and Canada are "nations in distress," falling prey to dangerous investments while their military and diplomatic power slips relative to the rest of the world's. "Without dramatic change," she writes, "Canada will remain … somewhat sleepy and vulnerable. The United States will continue to go broke buying foreign oil and cheap goods from Asia, then guarding countries that could and should pay for their own protection and, while they are at it, 'buy American.'"

"There has to be some kind of strategy," she told FP.

Francis was born in Chicago and holds dual citizenship -- but she's not some American agent provocateur. She acknowledges there is a certain paranoia about American intentions north of the border. "I think it's a function of being the little guy next to the big guy and always having to worry," she says. But there are real benefits to the merger -- "synergies," she notes in corporate terms -- especially for Canada. By erasing the border, Canada would gain a military with a stake in protecting its resources from foreign incursions, and the investment capital and people to develop oil, natural gas, and other mining projects in the country's undeveloped north. The United States, for its part, would have access to an estimated 13 percent of the world's remaining undiscovered oil reserves and 30 percent of its undiscovered natural gas. "The most obvious synergy," she writes, "would be matching Canada's undeveloped resource potential with America's money, markets, and workers."

In particular, Francis, who is a director for Aurizon Mines, Ltd., which operates a gold mine in Quebec, wants to see the United States invest in infrastructure in Canada's far north, which currently lacks the roads, ports, and pipelines necessary to make resource extraction possible. "That kind of a Marshall Plan with infrastructure and so on -- that would create millions of jobs, both sides of the border," she says. "The Americans should just roll up their sleeves and get on with it, because they've got the capital and they've got the market for the stuff. At the very least, there's got to be some kind of a joint venture, economically, and I say, 'Let's pick our partners.'"

It's a perspective that smacks of protectionism -- though Francis objects to the word. "It'sprotectiveness," she stresses. "I think that investing should only be done with one test in mind, and that's reciprocity. If the Chinese can buy Smithfield Foods, then the Americans can buy the Chinese company that wants to buy Smithfield -- but we can't. It's all one-way, and that's what they're doing and they're doing that everywhere. It's like, 'Heads, I win. Tails, you lose.'" In the book, she describes a "new cold war … being fought on economic grounds."

Francis imagines a half-dozen ways a merger could take place -- how the United States might buy out Canada, Louisiana Purchase-style, or set up resource funds to pay dividends to Canadian citizens. Politically, Canada's provinces might seek entry as U.S. states -- or perhaps as a commonwealth if Quebec wished to preserve a government of its own. They could form a federal union, à la unified Germany, create an overarching council (the Swiss model), or establish a coordinating government (the EU model). Francis never coins a name for her potential superstate. If Canada's provinces became U.S. states, then they would simply be absorbed into the United States of America. But as for the other models, who knows? Canamerica reads too much like a question, while Ameri-Canada sounds slightly better.

What would a united Ameri-Canada look like? In terms of acreage, it would be the largest country in world -- surpassing Russia, even all of South America, in size. Its economy would be larger than the European Union's. Since each country is the other's largest trading partner, trade deficits would shrink. Canadian oversight at the Fed would bring stability to American banking. With all its energy needs met domestically, Ameri-Canada would be a lucrative petrostate, exporting oil to the developing world.

For all the benefits -- energy self-sufficiency, secure borders, a cross-border maple syrup pipeline if we're lucky -- the merger would not be without consequences. Francis bets that the long-term economic incentives would outweigh the baggage Canada brings with it. But is that really the case? Would it be worth grappling with how to integrate U.S., Canadian, and Québécois laws, or trying to standardize health care across the two countries? Would Washington ever want to inherit First Nations land disputes, Quebec separatists, or Justin Bieber? And would Canadians want Washington, especially after such a case study in dysfunction this week?

They're questions that probably won't need to be asked -- and not just because the Republican Party would never allow it. (If Canadians were to vote in the presidential elections, the GOP would never take the White House again, Francis speculates.) The reception to Francis's proposal has been something between knee-jerk reactionism and hand-waving dismissiveness. Jonathan Kay, a managing editor for the National Post, where Francis also works, described the book with prototypically Canadian polite understatement: The book is Francis's "most ambitious. Perhaps a little too ambitious, many readers might conclude."

It's creating "a huge emotional stir," Francis says. "The idea of the book is to start a conversation.... The conversation isn't that enlightening yet, but it will be." And she knows it's ambitious: She never shies away from the biggest parallels she can draw -- there's that "Marshall Plan" for investment in Canada, and comparisons to German reunification or potential Korean reunification abound.

But there's an analogy Francis doesn't make. In 1985, Ibrahim Ibrahim, then a professor at Georgetown, presented a Cassandra-like proposal. With economic challenges looming in North Africa, Ibrahim suggested a three-way merger of Egypt, Libya, and Sudan. Egypt's abundant population and technological development could provide the impetus to turn Sudan into a "breadbasket" for the region, Ibrahim argued, and Libya could find political unity and integration, lest it be "abandoned to the wiles of history." The plan was similar to the one Francis proposes: "Initially, a common market would be created among the three, one in which free movement of labor and capital would be guaranteed.... In the second phase of the common market, the three countries would establish a formal political confederation, allowing for free trade, the integration of production, and technical integration. Only then can the three embark on a systematic, long-term plan of investment for the twenty-first century."

Like Francis's proposal, the plan was politically outlandish but economically sensible. Twenty-eight years later, after political and economic desperation have brought revolutions in Libya and Egypt, and with Sudan now partitioned but still underdeveloped, was this period of decline inevitable? The sensational, possibly hyperbolic future Francis envisions, of rising powers whittling away at Canada's -- and ultimately America's -- resources and sovereignty, is similarly dire.

"It doesn't have to be," she tells FP. "I'm not trying to be alarmist, or paranoid, or conspiratorial. [China and Russia] are just doing business, except that they're big and organized."

In many ways, Ameri-Canada is already a reality. "We're merging in some ways," Francis says. "We're merging in investment and ownership and people traveling," and she points out that three million Canadians live in the United States, and another million Americans have headed north. "But this border is really thickening," she says, pointing to immigration disputes since Sept. 11, 2001 and a growing cross-border drug trade. Since negotiations ended on the U.S.-Canada Free Trade Agreement on Oct. 4, 1987, "we haven't moved one nudge up from just taking down a few tariff barriers." It's time for that to change, she says, so she's "starting a conversation."

Francis wants to see the two countries go all the way. "We're dating heavily -- let's think about common law, maybe marriage," she explains. More likely, though, is something less formal, more gradual. "Perhaps this glacial drift from sovereignty," she writes, "will be the chosen path of Canadians and Americans -- a tacit, unacknowledged coasting into one another's arms."

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/10/03/the_case_for_canamerica_canada_america_merger?page=full