NORTON META TAG

Showing posts with label Vets Admin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vets Admin. Show all posts

20 June 2014

On Iraq, McCain Won't Take McCain's Advice 19JUN14

sen john mccain r AZ has a feeble brain and a big mouth. Yes, he did serve our country with honor during the Vietnam war, and yes, he suffered for our country as a POW in (then) N Vietnam. That doesn't make him an expert on military and foreign policy. As a politician he has devolved into a mealy mouthed political shrill feigning concern and compassion for our active duty service personnel and our vets while kow-towing to the extreme right wing of his party, supporting policies that enrich the military-industrial complex and the privatization for profit of veterans services cabal. His failed presidential campaign shows the nation is no longer impressed or swayed by his warmongering rhetoric. It is time for sen mccain to get over himself. From +Mother Jones .....
| Thu Jun. 19, 2014 1:19 PM EDT

The couple, in happier times
Last week, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) went ballistic. In response to the intensifying crisis in Iraq, an apoplectic McCain took to the Senate floor and demanded the resignation of President Barack Obama's entire national security team. He huffed that Obama's advisers have "been a total failure." He suggested that Obama was somehow responsible for the present predicament in Iraq. And what was McCain's big idea for addressing the crisis? What steps would he take had he not been prevented from becoming commander in chief by Obama? The senator proposed calling in former General David Petraeus, who led US forces in Iraq during the 2007 surge, and former General James Mattis, who succeeded Petraeus. That was it: Ask Petraeus what to do.
Well, it turns out, McCain wouldn't abide by his own advice. Earlier this week, I contacted Petraeus' office to ask what he thought the president should be doing in Iraq. Not surprisingly, Petraeus did not respond to the invitation (which was probably one of many from reporters). But on Wednesday, Petraeus, speaking at a conference in London, did share his current views. He accused Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki of "undermining" national reconciliation—an obvious point made by most observers. He also declared that Iraq needed a more inclusive government—another obvious point that the president and others have pushed. And Petraeus dismissed the possibility of US airstrikes against the Sunni insurgents that have captured several cities in Iraq:
This cannot be the United States being the air force of Shia militias or a Shia-on-Sunni Arab fight. It has to be a fight of all of Iraq against extremists who do happen to be Sunni Arabs but extremists that are wreaking havoc on a country that really had an enormous opportunity back in 2011, has made progress in certain areas but has certainly not capitalized on that enormous opportunity in the way that we had all hoped.
McCain, apparently, wasn't listening. On Thursday, McCain went full McCain. He called for ousting Maliki. (Obama and his aides are trying to nudge Maliki aside, but it's not a snap-of-the-fingers task to get rid of a Washington-endorsed guy who was elected.) And McCain demanded, yes, airstrikes:
Of course Maliki has to be transitioned out. But the only way that's going to happen is for us to assure Iraqis that we will be there to assist. And let me make it clear: No one that I know wants to send combat troops on the ground, but airstrikes are an important factor, psychologically and many other ways, and that may require some forward air controllers and some special forces.
Several other GOPers joined McCain on the Senate floor to denounce Obama. On the other side of the Capitol, House Speaker John Boehner has been blasting Obama on Iraq, accusing the president of "napping" but not proposing any specific actions. On Wednesday, Boehner refused to comment on whether Obama should order airstrikes. The crisis is confounding Obama's GOP critics. And they're not even listening to Petraeus.

19 June 2014

Bill Cassidy said Senate Democrats only moved to fund new VA clinics after scandal 16JUN14

HOPING to play the veterans and other voters of Louisiana as fools (as well counting on their well established racism, voluntary ignorance and religious hypocrisy) rep bill cassidy r tb LA, deliberately lies about +Nevada Senator Harry Reid and Senate Democrats and their policies and legislation concerning the Vets Admin health care crisis and American vets in general. 
Republicans Turn Their Backs on Veterans
rep bill cassidy will continue to run a dishonest, deceptive and manipulative campaign to defeat Sen Mary Landrieu D LA in November and there is a very good chance he will win. The voters of Louisiana should consider on thing before they vote. If bill cassidy is willing to lie, deceive, and manipulate them to win the election, how can he be trusted to represent their best interest, and those of the nation, in the US Senate? From +PolitiFact .....
The Truth-O-Meter Says:

Bill Cassidy said Senate Democrats only moved to fund new VA clinics after scandal

As details of the turmoil within the Department of Veterans Affairs continue to unfold, Congress is scrambling to pass legislation to fix to the problem.
One House Republican accused Democrats of closing the barn door after the horse got out.
"It’s been more than 177 days since the House passed bipartisan legislation that would authorize these VA clinics," Rep. Bill Cassidy, R-La., said in a statement on June 5, 2014. "Only after news broke that our veterans are dying because of inadequate health care did Harry Reid and Senate Democrats take action. We need to continue working towards patient-centered solutions so all veterans have access to quality healthcare."
Is it true that Senate Democrats only moved to fund new veterans health clinics after the scandal broke in April?
In a word: No.
The bill Cassidy references is H.R. 3251, the Department of Veterans Affairs Major Medical Facility Lease Authorization Act of 2013. The bill, authored by Rep. Jeff Miller, R-Fla., authorized the funding of 27 new Veterans Affairs health facilities around the country. On Dec. 10, 2013, the House passed the bill almost unanimously with a vote of 346 to 1. (Rep. Jeff Duncan, R-S.C., was the lone "no" vote.)
The bill stalled in the Senate. In fact, it never made it out of the Veterans' Affairs committee. But as is so often the case, the Senate was working on its own bill, and that one failed because Senate Republicans objected to it.
Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., introduced S. 1950, the Comprehensive Veterans Health and Benefits and Military Retirement Pay Restoration Act of 2014, on Jan. 16. (It would later be renumbered S. 1982). The scope of the bill was much broader than just funding 27 new VA health clinics. For example, it also included an expansion of physical and mental health benefits for some veterans and their families. Whereas Miller’s bill was nine pages, Sanders’ was 367 pages.
Republicans objected to several components of Sanders’ bill, including its funding mechanism. Sanders would pay for his bill with money that would have gone toward the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Republicans said those savings were already expected, so it wasn’t a real source of money. (For what it’s worth, the House bill did not really specify where its funding would be taken from.)
Republicans also hinged support for the bill on the inclusion of sanctions against Iran.
Democrats tried to bring Sanders’ bill up for a vote on Feb. 27. Republicans made a parliamentary maneuver that imposed a 60-vote threshold to bring it to the floor. With just 56 Senators voting "yea" — including two Republicans — the bill failed to advance.
Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., the ranking Republican on the Veterans' Affairs committee, said he was concerned about the costs and the expansion of the VA when there were already considerable problems with wait times.
In a press release, the American Legion lamented the bill’s failure.
"There was a right way to vote and a wrong way to vote today, and 41 senators chose the wrong way," American Legion National Commander Daniel Dellinger said. "That’s inexcusable."
That said, there wasn’t unanimous backing of the bill by veterans groups. In an op-ed, Stew­art Hickey, national exec­u­tive direc­tor for American Veterans, or AMVETS, said Sanders’ "kitchen sink-like" bill "would be morally irre­spon­si­ble and fis­cally unsound."
For the next couple months, Sen. David Vitter, R-La., and Sanders went back and forth on the status of the veterans bill. On March 11, Vitter offered an amendment to to the House bill that would pay for the new VA clinics through price controls for prescription drugs purchased by the Defense Department. Sanders said he supported the new clinics, but also wanted other provisions included in the comprehensive legislation.
On April 9, Miller, the chairman of the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs, announced that dozens of Arizona veterans died waiting for care from the VA, and he had evidence showing that administrators at the Phoenix office were forging wait times.
There were multiple points along the way when Sam Foote, a doctor of internal medicine at the Phoenix VA before he retired, attempted to blow the whistle on the bad practices in Arizona, including a December meeting with the Arizona Republic and a letter to the VA inspector general. But it wasn’t until Miller’s comments that the story broke and became a national scandal, eventually leading to the resignation of Veteran Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki.
Also on April 9, Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La. — who Cassidy is challenging for Senate in November — actually called for the House Republican bill to be discharged from the Senate Veteran Affairs committee. But that effort was blocked by Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, who asked for Vitter’s amendment to be included. Sanders objected.
"Both parties had a role in this," said Joe Davis, spokesman for Veterans of Foreign Wars.
A spokeswoman for Cassidy said the congressman was only referring to Senate inaction on the House measure in his statement. However, that isn’t how his statement reads. If that were the case, it would mean that Senate Democrats had decided to take up the House bill after the scandal hit, which isn’t true.
Our ruling
Cassidy said that "only after news broke that our veterans are dying because of inadequate health care did Harry Reid and Senate Democrats take action." That’s not accurate. Democrats tried to pass an expansive veterans’ bill that included funding for the same 27 new clinics that Cassidy and the House passed last December. The bill was blocked by Senate Republicans, who were concerned about its funding and its scope. They also wanted to include sanctions against Iran.
It’s fine for Cassidy to say Democrats bear some responsibility for not taking up the simpler House legislation, but it’s incorrect for him to claim that it took the scandal to propel Democrats into efforts to pass a VA bill. That’s revisionist history, so we rate Cassidy’s statement False.
About this statement:
Published: Monday, June 16th, 2014 at 2:10 p.m.
Subjects: Veterans
Sources:
Office of Rep. Bill Cassidy, Cassidy Comments on Senate Agreement to Authorize VA Clinics, June 5, 2014
Email interview with Jillian Rogers, spokeswoman for Cassidy, June 9, 2014
Email interview with Adam Jentleson, spokesman for Sen. Harry Reid, June 9, 2014
Cassidy letter to veteran groups, April 2, 2014
House of Representatives, Final vote results on roll call 630: H.R. 3521, Dec. 10, 2013
Library of Congress, Bill Summary and Status: H.R. 3521, accessed June 9, 2014
Library of Congress, Bill Summary and Status: S. 1982, accessed June 9, 2014
U.S. Senate, Final vote results on roll call 46: S. 1982, Feb. 27, 2014
United States Senate Democrats, Objections in relation to H.R.3521, Veterans Clinic Leases, April 9, 2014
United States Senate Democrats, Objections to H.R.3521 & S.1950, as amended – Veterans bills, April 2, 2014
United States Senate Democrats, Objection to H.R.3521, Vets Affairs Major Medical Facility Lease Authorization, March 6, 2014
United States Senate Democrats, Vitter request to pass Department of Veterans Affairs Major Medical Facility Lease Authorization Act of 2013, as amended; and Sanders request to pass the Comprehensive Veterans Health and Benefits and Military Retirement Pay Restoration Act, March 11, 2014
CapitolWords.org, "Comprehensive Veterans Health And Benefits And Military Retirement Pay Restoration Act Of 2014—Motion To Proceed," Feb. 26, 2014
Associated Press, "Senate blocks Dem bill boosting vets’ benefits," Feb. 27, 2014
Reuters, "U.S. Senate Republicans block veterans' health bill on budget worry," Feb. 27, 2014
American Legion, "American Legion: Senate vote on veterans bill ‘inexcusable,’" Feb. 27, 2014
AMVETS, "Supersized Veterans’ Bill Promises Much – Mostly Broken Promises," accessed June 9, 2014
USA Today, Veterans Health care Timeline, May 22, 2014
Written by: Steve Contorno
Researched by: Steve Contorno
Edited by: Louis Jacobson