NORTON META TAG

26 September 2013

Behind the Burrito: 5 Things Chipotle's Ads Don't Tell You 25SEP13

CHIPOTLE may be better for you than mcdonalds or burger king or those other places, but I don't like their deceptive and manipulative advertising campaigns. so they are just another fast food joint for me to avoid, and be better off for it. From Mother Jones.....

The restaurant touts organic cilantro, locally sourced veggies, antibiotic-free meat, and naturally raised pigs. Does it live up to its sustainable-food reputation?

| Wed Sep. 25, 2013 3:00 AM PDT

Chipotle Mexican Grill, the popular burrito chain that has more than 1,500 restaurants worldwide, hit the advertising jackpot earlier this month when it released a Pixar-style commercial that went viral and turned the restaurant into an overnight poster child for sustainable food. The advertisement, set to a mournful Fiona Apple song, depicts an animated scarecrow discovering the truth about factory farms—and then deciding to start his own farm instead (the scarecrow's farm is apparently vegetarian, because the animals magically disappear).
The restaurant chain has pushed hard to separate its image from McDonald's, a former investor in the company, and revamp itself as a sustainable-food choice for Americans who are against global warming and antibiotics, and in favor of fresh, locally sourced food. In its advertisements, the company throws around the word "natural" a lot—but unlike "organic," that doesn't have an actual USDA definition. So how well does Chipotle actually stack up? In an email, Chris Arnold, a spokesman for Chipotle, tells Mother Jones that "Chipotle is probably more transparent about the ingredients we use than any other national restaurant company. We have never professed to being perfect. Rather, the commitment we have made is to constant improvement, and we are always working to find better, more sustainable sources for all of the ingredients we use."
Here are five questions raised in Chipotle advertisements:
1. Does Chipotle support genetically modified organisms (GMOs)?
One of the main characters in Chipotle's scarecrow video is a creepy bird that flies around the factory farm and appears to be some kind of hybrid between a crow and a robot. In another scene, bird-robots are pumping mysterious chemicals into a chicken, inflating it like a beach ball. The video clearly implies that messing with Mother Nature is bad news—and Chipotle doesn't do it. Arnold says that "the film is about a host of issues in agriculture and industrial food production—the overuse of antibiotics, harsh crowding of animals, and the high degree to which so much food is processed. But there are no GMO references, either literal or symbolic."
According to its website, most of Chipotle's products contain genetically modified organisms (GMO), which accelerate the pesticides arms race and have not been adequately tested for long-term health effects. Chipotle has taken the laudable step of publicly backing GMO labeling and aiming to "eliminate GMOs from Chipotle's ingredients"—but the restaurant isn't there yet. According to Chipotle's website, all soy bean oil and corn products contain GMOs. That doesn't sound so bad, except that Chipotle chicken, steak, fajita vegetables, rice, tortilla chips, and tortillas all contain one or both of these items. (Restaurants in the New York City metropolitan area are an exception; they don't use soy bean oil.) Additionally, Arnold tells Mother Jonesthat the feed given to cows and pigs "very well could be GMO, given the prevalence of GMO crops in this country. Non-GMO feed is not part of our protocol."
2. Do Chipotle pigs, chickens, and cows frolic in big grassy fields?
The scarecrow ad wasn't the first time Chipotle has pushed the message that its animals frolic in fields (to pop music.) In 2011, it released the animated commercial above, set to a Coldplay song. Arnold, the Chipotle spokesman, says, "I think the way we portray our suppliers is very consistent with how they operate in reality" and that Chipotle uses "a number of naturally raised meat suppliers." Pork suppliers that fall under "naturally raised meat" are Niman Ranch Pork Company and Du Breton (you can see a Chipotle video with the founder of Niman Ranchhere). Niman Ranch's website says the farm takes many admirable steps to ensure its pigs are ethically raised, such as giving them a 100 percent vegetarian diet, veterinarian care, and allowing sows to have 64 square feet to share with their young. But the image in the commercial, that all the pigs are hanging out in a pasture, might not be accurate. Pigs at Niman Ranch aren't required to have outdoor access. They can be housed in hoop buildings with sunlight, instead. "Growing and finishing hogs"—the kind that you eat—are only requiredto have 8 to 18 square feet of space each, depending on weight, if they are housed in a structure that permits outdoor access. In cases where pigs are housed in hoop buildings, they only get 5 to 14 square feet. Access to to pasture or fields is "recommended" but not required. Drew Calvert, Niman Ranch's director of communications, tells Mother Jones that "we cannot speak to Chipotle's advertising, claims or videos" and "the number of farmers who raise hogs for Niman Ranch fluctuates, but a majority of the farmers raise animals outdoors."
The New Yorker also reports that some of Chipotle's beef is bought from Meyer Natural Foods, which finishes feeding cows in feedlots—so the beef isn't 100 percent grass-fed. (Arnold said over the phone that most of Chipotle's beef is "raised on pasture" but not 100-percent grass fed.) Meyer's website doesn't list a requirement for square feet of space for cattle, instead it says its farms must meet the more subjective, "adequate space for comfort" standard. (Meyer did not immediately respond to request for comment.) Arnold also noted that "chickens are raised in chicken houses, but with more space per bird than conventionally raised chicken [in factory farms.]"
3. Are most Chipotle ingredients locally sourced?
This clever billboard implies that if Chipotle were to talk about all of its "locally sourced" ingredients, it wouldn't fit on a snappy advertisement (again, "natural" has no federally regulated definition and can mean virtually anything). Chipotle's definition for "locally sourced" means that an ingredient was grown no more than 350 miles from a restaurant—which is 50 miles closer than the USDA recommendation—a worthy goal. But right now, the only locally sourced ingredients at Chipotle are onions, avocados, peppers, tomatoes, jalapenos, and cilantro—all of which are mixed with nonlocal items to produce the items you see on the menu. And all of which could probably fit on a billboard, with plenty of room. Arnold says using "local" in its advertisements is not misleading, because "when we advertise programs like this (whether our local produce program or our naturally raised meat program), we do it only when those things are available. Unfortunately, we can't get local produce year-round." He does note that Chipotle will have used more than 15 million pounds of local produce this year.
4. Does Chipotle ever use animals that are given antibiotics ?
Factory farms use antibiotics on animals to promote growth, even in the face of terrible health conditions. The resulting "superbugs" can even have harmful effects on humans—for example, women have started getting urinary tract infections that are resistant to antibiotics, a problem that is being attributed to chicken factory farming. Steve Ells, Chipotle founder, chairman and co-CEO, said in an August statement, "We decided to start serving meat from animals that have never been given antibiotics or added hormones more than a decade ago…And we continue to be committed to the elimination of antibiotics that are used to promote growth in livestock being raised in confinement operations." Right now, Chipotle allows animals that are sick to be given antibiotics, but they are not permitted to return to Chipotle's supply and are instead sold as conventional meat. Ells said the company is "willing to consider" allowing animals to rejoin after they've been treated with antibiotics. Only about 80 percent of Chipotle beef is raised without antibiotics (or growth hormones) because of supply shortages—the rest is sourced from conventional farms, although Chipotle tries to notify customers when that is the case.
5. Is most Chipotle food organic?
 
Chipotle regularly brags about its organic cilantro, its cotton products, and how it's doing more than the rest of the industry to promote organic food. And that may be true—but organic pickings at Chipotle are still slim. (Chipotle's Arnold says, "Twitter is somewhat limited for communications like that because of the 140-character limit, but I don’t think they ever imply that our food is 'organic.'") According to the Chipotle website, the only organic items—unlike the word "natural," organic has a strict USDA definition—are beans, oregano, avocado, and cilantro, and potentially jalapenos and rice. And judging by Chipotle's Twitter account, Chipotle isn't revealing on its website that ingredients, like beans, labeled "organic" are not entirely organic. (Arnold argues, "We are quite careful in labeling these things so our customers know what we have and where.")
So if you're headed off to lunch after reading this article, and you want to eat organic, avoid GMOs, and get food that's locally sourced—your best best is to go to a grocery store, read the labels very carefully, and make a sandwich. But if that's not an option, you're far better off going to Chipotle than McDonald's, where if you order a burger—literally just a bun, meat, and Big Mac sauce—you're eating more than 60 ingredients. Good luck, America.

Reporter
Dana Liebelson is a reporter in Mother Jones' Washington bureau. Her work has also appeared inThe WeekTIME's BattlelandTruthoutOtherWords and Yahoo! NewsRSS | 

Does "Corporate Farming" Exist? Barely.& Why Commodity Farming Is a Tough Row to Hoe 25&26SEP13

HERE are two interesting articles on farming from Mother Jones. I am one of those who thought the family farm was being wiped out by big agribusiness. This explains how it really is....I am sure of one thing though, I am not buying anything from Smithfield any more since the profits will now be going to the prc.....
| Wed Sep. 25, 2013 3:00 AM PDT

American Gothic with businessman
Goaded on by small-is-good gospel, plenty of people have adopted a Manichean view of modern US farming: large, soulless corporate enterprises on one side, human-scale, artisanal operations on the other.
Take, for example, Chipotle's much-discussed new web ad, which tugs at the heartstrings by painting a haunting picture of a small-time farmer who finds himself working for—and then competing against—a fictional industrial-farming behemoth.
Reality is a lot more complicated. While there are plenty of mega-corporations in the food industry, they rarely do the actual farming themselves.
A USDA study released in August found that 96.4 percent of US crop farms are "family farms," or "ones in which the principal operator, and people related to the principal operator by blood or marriage, own more than half." That number doesn't leave a lot of room for corporate farmers, does it?
The story is a bit—but not that much—different in meat production. Pork, and pork only, actually has corporations raising significant numbers of livestock. Here are the largest hog producers in the United States, lifted from an interesting 2010 paper by Tufts University researchers Tim Wise and Sarah Trist:
Wise and Trist, 2010
Smithfield, recently bought by the Chinese conglomerate Shuanghui International (in a dealjust approved by Smithfield's shareholders), is obviously a massive, globe-spanning corporation. Not only does it raise about 1 in 5 American hogs, it also has a 31 percent share of the hog-processing market, Wise and Trist show. When Smithfield directly raises 1.2 million hogs per year, that's corporate farming.
But after Smithfield, things change quickly. As the above chart shows, the nation's fourth-largest hog producer, Iowa Select Farms, has a 2.5 percent market share. Yes, that's a lot of hogs—150,000 per year, to be exact—but the vast majority of America's other 70,000 pig farms tend to be family-owned operations. It's true that they usually operate under contract with mega-processors like Smithfield and peers like Tyson and JBS. But these aren't corporate-owned farms.
In beef, the last stage of conventional cow production—fattening them for slaughter—islargely dominated by big players. Here (from a 2010 paper by Texas Tech University ag scientist M. L. Galyean) are the biggest operators of feedlots—those massive, infamous pens where cows spend their last days chomping on corn and soy-based feed, laced with dodgy additives:
Galyean, ‎2011
And here are the dominant processors, the corporations that slaughter the fattened cows and cut them into beef (note how Cargill and JBS appear on both lists):
But again, the farms that supply the feedlots—that raise the calves until they are ready to be fattened in those corporate-run confined finishing operations—are almost exclusively family-owned businesses, as this 2011 USDA paper shows. And there are more than 700,000 of them.
As for chicken, the USDA counts more than 17,000 operations producing "broilers," or meat chickens. Very few of them are owned by companies like Tyson, Pilgrim's Pride (a JBS subsidiary), or Perdue—the mega-processors that slaughter and package most birds. According to the USDA, farms directly owned by those giants account for just 1 percent of total broiler production. The bulk of the rest are family-owned, albeit working under contract to a big processor:
Chart: USDA
So what's going on here—why is the perception of "corporate farming" so widespread when actually almost all of the country's food is being grown or raised by family-owned operations?
It might have something to do with the fact that corporate agribusiness is indeed very real—it's just that it has carved out the most profitable parts of food production for itself, while leaving the dirty, uncertain work of farming for others.
The reality is that farming itself is generally a terrible business. There's much more—and much easier—money to be made by selling farmers the raw materials of their trade—like seeds, fertilizer, or livestock feed. And there's also plenty of money in buying farmers' output cheap (say, corn or hogs) and selling it dear (as, say, pork chops or high-fructose corn syrup). In his excellent 2004 book Against the Grain: How Agriculture Has Hijacked Civilization, Richard Manning pungently describes the situation:
A farm scholar once asked an agribusiness executive when his corporation would simply take over the farms. The exec said that it would be dumb for the corporation to do so, in that it is not free to exploit its employees to the degree that farmers are willing to exploit themselves.
Tomorrow, I'll lay out, with charts, just how tough it is for farmers caught between the huge corporate suppliers and the huge corporate buyers.

Food and Ag Correspondent
Tom Philpott is the food and ag correspondent for Mother Jones. For more of his stories, clickhere. To follow him on Twitter, click hereRSS | 

VIDEO Captain Kirk watches Miley Cyrus performance

Published on Aug 29, 2013
Original "USS Enterprise reacts to MTV's Video Music Awards."
http://www.facebook.com/ariesheadfilms
http://www.twitter.com/arieshead
Try another channel Lt. Uhura. Set Phasers to overkill, Mr Chekov.


Star Trek and all of its adjacent elements are copyrighted to Paramount Pictures.
No profit of any kind is made with this parody.

22 September 2013

WINE GUIDE

THESE are a riot but I have moved my favorite to the top of the list.....