NORTON META TAG

29 January 2025

$50 million for condoms in Gaza? There’s no evidence for the White House claim. 29JAN25

Four Pinocchios

 ONE can be forgiven if one comes to believe the cross karoline leavitt, White House FF* press secretary frequently wears is not a symbol of her faith but is mere jewelry, after all, there is no way a person of true faith, a person true to their faith, would not be able to come before the press and the American people to repeat and defend the lies, the hatred, the racism, the greed, the misogyny, class warfare and fearmongering being spread by the drumpf / trump-vance administration and the gop / greed over people-republican party. UNLESS of course they are believers in, followers of the neo-nazi, fascist religious right-wing extremist magat cult with it's alt-jesus icon and "christian" sharia anti-beatitudes beliefs. Oh and here is the truth about another of their lies, this one exposed by the Washington Post fact checkers....

$50 million for condoms in Gaza? There’s no evidence for the White House claim.


The figure would rain 1.5 billion condoms on an area only double the size of the District of Columbia.

Updated
January 29, 2025 at 5:28 p.m. ESTtoday at 5:28 p.m. EST

Glenn Kessler has reported on domestic and foreign policy for more than four decades. Send him statements to fact check by emailing him or sending a DM on Twitter

“DOGE and OMB also found that there was about to be 50 million taxpayer dollars that went out the door to fund condoms in Gaza. That is a preposterous waste of taxpayer money. So, that’s what this pause is focused on, being good stewards of tax dollars.”


— White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, remarks at a news briefing, Jan. 29


In her maiden news briefing, Leavitt defended the Trump administration’s freeze on federal grants by pointing to a particular line item as “preposterous” — $50 million to fund condoms in Gaza.

Regular readers know that we have a high bar for fact-checking flacks, as they are paid to mislead and dissemble. We prefer to keep our scrutiny on policymakers and people with authority. But this was Leavitt’s first news conference, and she made an astonishing claim that spread rapidly on social media.

Could it be true? When we queried Leavitt, she responded by sending a Fox News article that initially just quoted her own statement. Quoting yourself is not evidence. Moreover, the article quoted an unnamed White House official as saying that the “State Department halted several million dollars going to condoms in Gaza this past weekend.”

That’s not the same as $50 million.

Last year, the State Department launched a five-year, $50 million program to improve health care in Gaza. But the contractor, Anera, said it was not supplying condoms.

“Definitely no purchase of condoms in our program, and there are no components for family planning in the GHRA [Gaza Health Recovery Activity],” spokesman Steve Fake said. “We have asked around, and no one is sure what this is referring to.”

Last night, State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce posted a thread on X in which she cited examples of “unjustified and non-emergency spending.” The first example was “Condoms. Prevented $102 million in unjustified funding to a contractor in Gaza, including money for contraception.”

She did not identify the contractor, but, in an email to State Department reporters, her office said it was “$102,236,000 to fund the International Medical Corps in Gaza.” IMC is a global first responder based in Los Angeles.

Could half — or even a significant portion — of that contract be for condoms? There is no evidence of that.

The Facts

Let’s start with why the U.S. government distributes condoms overseas: It’s to prevent the spread of HIV/AIDS. Perhaps the Trump administration believes that is a preposterous waste of money, but many of those condom purchases are for a George W. Bush program called the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), which is credited with saving 26 million lives. No countries or territories in the Middle East are part of PEPFAR.

More broadly, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) distributes condoms to address gaps in their availability and use, especially in low- and middle-income countries, to prevent the spread of sexually transmitted diseases.

USAID report for fiscal 2023, the most recent detailing condom expenditures unrelated to PEPFAR, showed that about $46,000 was spent on condoms in the Middle East — but only in Jordan. The report said that was the first shipment of condoms to the Middle East since fiscal 2019, when $1 million was spent.

Indeed, according to the report, spending $50 million on condoms for an entity roughly double the size of Washington would be a huge increase in condom spending. From fiscal 2016 to 2022, USAID spent $118.6 million to buy 3.6 billion male condoms for 60 countries. That’s an average of $17 million a year for the entire world — one-third of the amount Leavitt said would be spent just on Gaza. (USAID also distributes female condoms, but that’s a small fraction of the spending.)

In effect, USAID has been buying condoms at an average price of 3.3 cents. Was the U.S. government really going to distribute more than 1.5 billion condoms in Gaza? That makes little sense.

Traditionally, family planning in the Palestinian territories, including Gaza, was handled by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA). The agency distributed oral contraceptives and condoms, but President Joe Biden froze U.S. funding a year ago after Israel claimed that 12 of the agency’s 33,000 employees participated in Hamas’s 2023 attack on Israel.

The war that erupted after that attack created a family planning crisis in Gaza, according to the International Planned Parenthood Federation. “Contraception is also in very short supply, with reports of women sharing contraceptive pills leading to unintended pregnancies,” the IPPF said in a 2023 report. “The unavailability of condoms, which were already heavily restricted in Gaza, will lead to the transmission of sexually transmitted infections, including HIV.”

With the ceasefire now in place, it’s possible there is a pressing need to fill. But we could not find any evidence that the International Medical Corps contracts called for condom delivery.

Todd Bernhardt, IMC spokesman, told The Fact Checker that “no U.S. government funding was used to procure or distribute condoms.”

In a November report describing its activities in Gaza, IMC said it deployed two state-of-the-art field hospitals — the first in January 2024, with 200 beds, and the second in July 2024, with 50 beds. The hospitals operate 24 hours per day, seven days per week. Each day they see as many as 2,000 patients, perform an average of 45 surgeries and deliver an average of 10 babies, the report said. It did not mention any family planning efforts. CBS News last year aired a report on American doctors working at the hospitals.

“Since January 2024, International Medical Corps has provided health care to more than 383,000 civilians who had no other access to services or treatment, including performing about 11,000 surgeries, with one-third of those categorized as major or moderate procedures,” Bernhardt said. “We have assisted in the delivery of some 5,000 babies, about 20 percent of them via the Caesarean section. In addition, International Medical Corps has screened 111,000 people for malnutrition, treated 2,767 for acute malnutrition, distributed micronutrient supplements to 36,000 people, and more.”

“If the stop-work order remains in place, we will be unable to sustain these activities beyond the next week or so,” he said.

After this fact check was published, a White House official sent The Fact Checker a statement claiming, without providing documentation, that two $50 million buckets of aid for Gaza via the International Medical Corps that were suspended included “family planning programming including emergency contraception; Sexual health-care including prevention and management of sexually transmitted infections (STIs); and Adolescent sexual and reproductive health.” The statement added that this included contraceptives and that “condoms have traditionally always been used for family planning in developing countries by USAID.”

The White House official declined to say how much money in these contracts related to family planning. From our review of International Medical Corps contracts, we did not find any funds earmarked for contraception or family planning. In any case, the White House statement appears to be a pullback of the original claim.

The Pinocchio Test

On the face of it, Leavitt’s statement that $50 million was going to be spent on condoms is preposterous. That figure is three times the yearly average spent by the U.S. government for the entire world. Moreover, neither she nor the State Department could provide documentation supporting this claim. The department identified a contractor that it claimed was distributing condoms in Gaza, but the organization says no U.S. money is involved.

Leavitt earns Four Pinocchios. Not an auspicious debut.

Four Pinocchios

(About our rating scale)

Send us facts to check by filling out this form.

Sign up for The Fact Checker weekly newsletter.

The Fact Checker is a verified signatory to the International Fact-Checking Network code of principles.

After losing son to dark web, mom rips Trump pardon for site’s founder 29JAN25



 (NOT MY) pres drumpf / trump and all the magats have so much to say about Pres Biden's pardons and commutations, most of it lies, deceptions and misrepresentations while celebrating drumpf's / trump's pardons for dozens of violent criminals, most of whom could have been tried for and convicted of treason to boot. And then there's ross ulbricht and his silk road empire that made him crypto currency rich off sales of  heroin, cocaine, methamphetamine and 25I-NBOMe (smiles / n-bomb) but morally bankrupt because he just kept that illegal drug train coming. Nobody in the drumpf / trump-vance administration or the gop / greed over people-republican party cares illegal drugs bought off silk road killed 16 year old Alejandro Avila by an overdose. All they care about is how silk road was another option that accepted crypto currency and propagandizing that was going to make crypto currency more acceptable, more usable and make them richer. Sharing in that overwhelming greed resulted in drumpf / trump pardoning ross ulbricht. From the Washington Post

After losing son to dark web, mom rips Trump pardon for site’s founder

As cryptocurrency advocates cheer Ross Ulbricht’s release, one mother asks, “Where’s the justice?”

Today at 2:26 p.m. EST

Tobi Raji is a reporter on The Washington Post's General Assignment team. Before that, she spent nine months covering the federal judiciary and the Supreme Court as a part of The Washington Post's Opportunity Program. She was previously a researcher for The Early 202, The Post's flagship politics newsletter. She joined The Post in 2021

Joseph Menn joined The Post in 2022 after two decades covering technology for Reuters, the Financial Times and the Los Angeles Times. His books include "Cult of the Dead Cow: How the Original Hacking Supergroup Might Just Save the World" (2019) and "Fatal System Error: The Hunt for the New Crime Lords who are Bringing Down the Internet" (2010).

Dorine Núñez Ávila, seen with her family, lost her 16-year-old son, Alejandro, in 2012. He overdosed on drugs purchased on Silk Road, a now-defunct online marketplace. (Family photo)

It was just after midnight when a phone call from an unknown number woke Dorine Núñez Ávila.

The California mother of two was in bed after dropping her 16-year-old son, Alejandro, off at a friend’s house for a sleepover. When Núñez Ávila answered the phone early that September morning in 2012, the caller identified herself as Cheri Cook, whose grandson, Bradley, was hosting the get-together. She said Alejandro had gone into cardiac arrest.

Núñez Ávila rushed to Cook’s house, where she found her son unresponsive in the garage. Paramedics transported the teenager to Marshall Hospital in Placerville, California, where he was pronounced dead. Alejandro, just a few weeks into his sophomore year of high school, had overdosed.

Alejandro is one of at least six people to have died after overdosing on drugs purchased on Silk Road, a now-defunct online marketplace where users could buy and sell illegal drugs such as heroin, cocaine and methamphetamine, according to court documents.

President Donald Trump pardoned the site’s founder, Ross Ulbricht, this month. Ulbricht had been sentenced to life in prison in 2015 after being convicted on seven counts, including conspiracy and money laundering, related to the sprawling empire he created.

In an interview with The Washington Post, Núñez Ávila slammed Trump’s pardon as hypocritical.

“He talks about immigrants coming here to the States, bringing drugs to the U.S., but yet he pardons this individual that was sentenced for life in prison back in 2015,” Núñez Ávila said. “I really don’t understand.”

“I strongly feel that individuals who are involved in distributing illegal drugs should be in prison forever,” she added. “These people should not be out here. They’re dangerous.”

The pardon was part of a May campaign promise Trump made to libertarian voters, who had long sought Ulbricht’s release. In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump said signing the pardon was his “pleasure” and called Ulbricht’s life sentence “ridiculous.”

Núñez Ávila said when she first heard the news of Ulbricht’s pardon, she asked herself what was being done for those affected by Silk Road, saying Ulbricht “broke up a lot of families.”

“Our family is broken. Our life has not been the same since Alejandro left 12, 13 years ago, and it will never be the same,” she said.

The night of — and after

When Alejandro was 14, his parents bought him a Miami Heat basketball jersey for Christmas. The deep-red No. 6 jersey belonged to NBA star LeBron James, Alejandro’s favorite basketball player.

Alejandro loved playing basketball and watching NBA legend LeBron James. His mother gifted his prized Miami Heat jersey to a friend after his death. (Family photo)

A star in his own right, Alejandro had spent the past year playing basketball in Pollock Pines, California, for the Amateur Athletic Union. Whenever Alejandro made a layup, Núñez Ávila said, fans used to tell her that it looked as if he was flying.

Alejandro, who dreamed of attending college near the beach, died after overdosing on 25I-NBOMe, an LSD-like drug commonly referred to as “Smiles” or “N-bomb.”

According to court documents, Elijah Lee Richter of Camino, California, imported the drug from Europe to his home in El Dorado County after ordering from the site. Richter then sold some of the tabs to Jesse Roberts, who, in turn, sold the drug to Alejandro and his friends.

Alejandro took four hits of 25I-NBOMe that summer night, according to court documents. After ingesting the tabs, Alejandro became incoherent and aggressive. His friends tried to calm him down and were able to get him to sit in a chair. However, shortly afterward, Alejandro stiffened, fell face-first out of the chair and began having violent seizures, at which point his friends went to call for help.

Thursday would have been his 29th birthday.

“I don’t like to think about it, but you kind of wonder what he would be doing right now, what kind of life he would have right now,” Núñez Ávila said. “Would he have children? Would he be married? Where would he be working?”

Bryan Barry, 25, of Boston and Jordan Mettee, 27, of Bellevue, Washington, also died after taking drugs purchased on Silk Road, according to court documents.

Bryan was found dead in his Boston apartment in October 2013, just days after his 25th birthday. According to court documents, officers found a belt in his left hand and a small plastic bag of brown heroin and a syringe next to him. Law enforcement analyzed Bryan’s laptop and discovered that he had conducted several searches, including how to find heroin in Boston, the “fastest way to get a bitcoin” and “can you trust seller reviews on silk road.”

At Ulbricht’s May 2015 sentencing hearing, Bryan’s father, Richard, asked U.S. District Judge Katherine B. Forrest, who was overseeing the New York case, to impose the harshest sentence possible.

“While it is true we are all born with free will that allows us to make our own choices in life, drugs that are highly addictive — like heroin — diminish or eliminate our ability to make good choices,” Richard said. “Ross Ulbricht’s Silk Road scheme removed all the natural ‘governors’ that would otherwise prevent people like Bryan from gaining access to a drug like heroin.”

The view from the cryptocurrency industry

Ulbricht created Silk Road in 2011. He operated the website on the dark web under the alias “Dread Pirate Roberts” — a reference to a character in the 1987 movie “The Princess Bride” — until it was shut down by law enforcement in 2013.

Transactions on Silk Road were made using bitcoin, a digital currency that helped shield users’ identity. Ulbricht was considered a pioneer in the use of cryptocurrency.

Some cryptocurrency enthusiasts have lionized Ulbricht as a champion of a free market for everything, absolving him of the trades on his site because he profited only passively through fees instead of selling directly.

Ulbricht’s life sentence, and the revelation that two law enforcement officers tried to steal some of his riches while investigating Silk Road, reinforced his fans’ view that he was unfairly targeted.

This undated photograph of Ross Ulbricht, creator of the website Silk Road, was presented as an exhibit at his 2015 criminal trial in New York federal court. (U.S. attorney’s office for the Southern District of New York/Reuters)

Rank-and-file crypto holders — many of whom got involved in electronic currency after Ulbricht’s trial — cheered his release on social media, both as a redemption for a maligned hero and as a general positive sign for crypto’s future under Trump. Any retreat from regulation would make their holdings worth more, at least in the short term.

While Trump’s crypto czar, David Sacks, retweeted a positive take on the pardon, he did not voice anything directly.

In fact, few well-known crypto backers spoke publicly.

Some naturally did not want to be associated with the depths of the criminality. Others fretted that the pardon, along with a promised new approach at the Securities and Exchange Commission and Trump’s personal involvement in memecoins, which have no intrinsic value, could suggest a future with no rules at all.

That could hurt companies that have been following the law, and it could spiral into widespread criminality and provoke some retrenchment.

Paul Grewal, chief legal officer at Coinbase, was among those who tried to thread the needle by stressing that Trump had promised to free Ulbricht, a move that came as the crypto-friendly Libertarian Party asked Trump to speak at its convention.

“It tells you how deeply he is committed to righting all kinds of wrongs across crypto,” Grewal told The Post. “I think this commitment extends to creating clear rules for the industry, which we’ve already seen the new SEC say they will do.”

FBI agents and prosecutors who worked on the case declined to comment, with one citing the unpredictable political environment.

But the pardon has sparked concern and uncertainty within the law enforcement community.

“Ulbricht controlled one of the largest and most prolific illicit darkweb marketplaces, where heroin, cocaine and various other drugs and illegal services were offered,” former Department of Homeland Security investigator Cristopher Musto wrote on LinkedIn, adding that he generally supported Trump. “Law enforcement agencies across the United States did dozens of these marketplace cases, do they all get thrown out?”

Ketanji Brown Jackson Wore A Symbol Of Silent Rebellion At Inauguration 21JAN25


 WELL done U.S. Supreme Court Justice Brown Jackson! You are an inspiration to all of us intent on defending our democratic Republic from the neo-nazi, fascist, authoritarian threat of the drumpf / trump-vance administration and the gop / greed over people-republican controlled congress. Thank you! From Brian Tyler Cohen,  Huffpost,    



U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson attends Donald Trump's inauguration on Monday wearing a cowrie shell collar.
CHIP SOMODEVILLA via Getty Images
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson attends Donald Trump's inauguration on Monday wearing a cowrie shell collar.

Donald Trump’s inauguration was a spectacle that went beyond politics. People across the world scrolled through their feeds to see how Washington’s most elite turned up — and by that, we mean what they wore.

For the most part, people were dressed for a somber affair in a sea of unremarkable navy and dark earth tones. However, one look that drew acknowledgment for its dramatic visual significance is the cowrie shell collar Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wore around her neck.


“Even without understanding the specific cultural significance of cowrie shells, the visual impact of this piece is undeniable,” fashion and costume historian Shelby Ivey Christie told HuffPost. “The dramatic scale of the necklace against the black robe communicates importance and intentionality.”

Christie explained that even those who don’t dissect “looks” can recognize that the Supreme Court justice dressed with intention. “The white shells arranged in a formal pattern suggest ceremony and significance,” she said. “For the average observer, this likely reads as a powerful statement piece that marks an historic moment.”

After all, Jackson is the first Black female justice to sit on the court. “Even folks unfamiliar with its cultural significance can recognize it as a meaningful choice.”

The Symbolic Significance Of Cowrie Shells

For readers unfamiliar with cowrie shells, Christie explained that they are “small, glossy sea shells that have been integral to African culture and commerce for thousands of years.”

“These shells served as currency across Africa, Asia and the Pacific Islands well into the 20th century,” Christie said, adding that they can be worn as jewelry, “strung into elaborate necklaces, sewn onto garments, woven into hair and attached to masks and ceremonial dress.” She also noted that royal regalia often features cowrie shells.

“In many African traditions, cowrie shells are believed to carry protective properties and spiritual significance,” she said. “They’re often seen as conduits of ancestral wisdom and protection, used in divination practices and spiritual ceremonies.”

Cowrie Shells In America

The cowrie shell has also found its way into fine jewelry by Black American designers. Fine jewelry designer Catherine Sarr’s Almasika, a luxury line of 18-karat gold and diamonds, debuted in 2014 with a collection Sarr called the diamond cowrie. She described the collection as “an homage to a shell that’s rich in symbolism.”

Her clients include former first lady Michelle Obama, singer Alicia Keys, and actors Issa Rae, Sandra Oh, Tracee Ellis Ross and Reese Witherspoon. Of the cowrie shell, Sarr noted, “It’s always been a talisman associated with good fortune.”

Michelle Obama wears Almasika jewelry in 2021.
Richard Cartwright via Getty Images
Michelle Obama wears Almasika jewelry in 2021.

Justice Jackson’s Cowrie Shell Bib

At first glance, Jackson’s necklace resembles a judicial bib. “This design brilliantly reinterprets the traditional judicial jabot through an African-American cultural lens,” explained Christie. “The cascading arrangement of shells mirrors the formal neckpiece typically worn by Supreme Court justices, but reimagines it using elements deeply rooted in African and African American aesthetic traditions.”

Jackson’s choice to wear cowrie shells to the Capitol Rotunda among billionaires like Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerberg is also a nod to the thousands of Black women who have to coexist professionally with their own version of the billionaire’s boys club — and the white women who exoticize their hair, jewelry and other sartorial markers of identity.

“It exemplifies how Black women often navigate professional spaces,” Christie told HuffPost, “honoring institutional traditions while asserting cultural identity.”

She called Jackson’s necklace a beacon of hope and assertion of independence, encouraging Black women and others who don’t support the Trump administration to “bring one’s whole identity into spaces of institutional power.” Not only that, Christie explained, but the necklace “carries ancestral strength and draws upon the collective wisdom of generations past.”


CORRECTION: This article has been amended to note that Ketanji Brown Jackson is the first Black woman on the Supreme Court.